Chapitre 0.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Crosswalking EUR-Lex Crosswalking OA-78-07-319-EN-C OA-78-07-319-EN-C Michael Düro Michael Düro Crosswalking EUR-Lex: Crosswalking EUR-Lex: a proposal for a metadata mapping a proposal for a metadata mapping to improve access to EU documents : to improve access to EU documents a proposal for a metadata mapping to improve access to EU documents to access improve mapping to a metadata for a proposal The Oce for Ocial Publications of the European Michael Düro has a background The Oce for Ocial Publications of Communities oers direct free access to the most complete in information science, earned a Masters the European Communities collection of European Union law via the EUR-Lex online in European legal studies and works in is the publishing house of the institu- database. the EUR-Lex unit of the Oce for Ocial tions, agencies and other bodies of the Publications of the European The value of the system lies in the extensive sets of metadata European Union. Communities. which allow for ecient and detailed search options. He was awarded the The Publications Oce produces and Nevertheless, the European institutions have each set up Dr. Eduard-Martin-Preis for outstanding distributes the Ocial Journal of the their own document register including their own sets of research in 2008 by the University of European Union and manages the metadata, in order to improve access to their documents and Saarland, Germany, for this thesis. EUR-Lex website, which provides direct meet the increasing need for transparency. free access to European Union law. Michael Düro suggests that to simplify access to EU documents, a common single search option could be based Online services on a mapping of the most relevant metadata to the Dublin eur-lex.europa.eu: EU law Core Metadata Element Set. Then a second mapping — bookshop.europa.eu: EU publications linked to the idea of EUR-Lex serving as the single repository ted.europa.eu: public procurement for European documents — could prepare the ground for cordis.europa.eu: research and the completion and enrichment of the document and innovation metadata collection. With regard to its inter-institutional context, and using the 2, rue Mercier ideas proposed in this publication, EUR-Lex could enhance, 2985 Luxembourg even further, public access to EU documents. LUXEMBOURG Crosswalking EUR-Lex: a proposal for a metadata mapping to improve access to EU documents is intended for all those who would like, or need to know more about the European institutions' tools implementing the policy on access to documents. The main proposals could serve as food for thought for those involved in decision-making in that eld. 9 78927 9 0187 018787 87 > publications.europa.eu Michael Düro Crosswalking EUR-Lex: a proposal for a metadata mapping to improve access to EU documents Th e content of this publication does not necessarily refl ect the offi cial posi- tion of the European Communities. Th e information and opinions contained herein are the sole responsibility of the author. Europe Direct is a service to help you fi nd answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Offi ce for Offi cial Publications of the European Communities, 2009 ISBN 978-92-78-40511-3 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in France Printed on white chlorine-free paper Contents 1. Introduction 11 1.1. General objectives and the purpose of the metadata applications proposed 11 1.2. Overview 15 1.3. Transparency and the access to documents of the European institutions 17 2. An interinstitutional issue: public access to documents 19 2.1. Early provisions 19 2.2. Th e treaty article: Article 255 TEC 24 2.3. Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 25 2.3.1. Th e decision-making process 26 2.3.2. Th e provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 27 2.3.3. Further implications: the agencies and bodies 29 2.4. Th e Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (Constitutional Treaty) 34 3. An essential obligation from Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001: the document registers of the institutions 37 3.1. Th e Commission’s Register of Documents 37 3.2. Access to Council documents: the public register 41 3.3. Th e European Parliament Public Register of Documents 43 4. Other tools: PreLex, the Legislative Observatory (OEIL) and the Commission’s Register of Comitology 49 4.1. PreLex: monitoring the decision-making process between institutions 49 4.2. Th e Legislative Observatory 53 4.3. Th e Commission’s Register of Comitology 60 5. The interinstitutional access to European law: EUR-Lex 65 5.1. Th e beginnings: the CELEX database 65 5.1.1. CELEX history: an overview 65 5.1.1.1. Th e start as an internal database 66 5.1.1.2. Th e gradual opening of access and full language coverage 68 5.1.1.3. CELEX on the Internet 73 5.1.1.4. CELEX and the old EUR-Lex portal 75 5.1.1.5. 2004: CELEX’s last active year 79 3 Crosswalking EUR-Lex: a proposal for a metadata mapping to improve access to EU documents 5.1.2. Th e content of the CELEX database: the sector structure 82 5.1.2.1. Sector 1: the treaties 84 5.1.2.2. Sector 2: international agreements 85 5.1.2.3. Sector 3: secondary legislation 86 5.1.2.4. Sector 4: supplementary legislation 87 5.1.2.5. Sector 5: preparatory acts 87 5.1.2.6. Sector 6: jurisprudence 89 5.1.2.7. Sector 7: national implementation measures of directives 90 5.1.2.8. Sector 8: national jurisprudence 90 5.1.2.9. Sector 9: Parliamentary questions 91 5.1.2.10. Sector E: EFTA documents 91 5.1.2.11. Sector C: Other documents published in the OJ 92 5.1.2.12. Sector 0: consolidated documents 93 5.1.3. Th e CELEX search 93 5.1.3.1. CELEX menu: a browsing approach 94 5.1.3.2. CELEX expert: the sophisticated search function 97 5.1.4. Data availability and coverage by the search options 103 5.2. Th e documentary analysis of the content 112 5.2.1. Th e CELEX number 113 5.2.2. Th e Eurovoc thesaurus 114 5.2.3. Th e classifi cation of the Directory of Community legislation in force 115 5.2.4. Th e list of subject-matter descriptors 116 5.3. Th e predecessor: the ‘old’ EUR-Lex portal 116 5.4. EUR-Lex: description of the new system 120 5.4.1. Th e presentation of the Offi cial Journal 123 5.4.2. Th e simple search 124 5.4.3. Th e presentation of the collections 129 5.4.3.1. Th e treaties 129 5.4.3.2. Legislation in force 130 5.4.3.3. Preparatory acts 130 5.4.3.4. Case-law 131 4 6. A proposal for simplifying the access to documents: mapping the institutions’ metadata to the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set 133 6.1. Th e Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DCMES) 138 6.1.1. Th e Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) 139 6.1.2. Elements and refi nements: an introduction 140 6.2. A crosswalk for EUR-Lex’s metadata to DCMES 144 6.2.1. Defi ning EUR-Lex metadata 144 6.2.2. A proposal: mapping EUR-Lex metadata to DCMES 148 6.2.3. EUR-Lex — DCMES: comments and additional rules 149 6.3. A crosswalk for the registers’ metadata to Dublin Core 151 6.3.1. A DC crosswalk for the metadata of the Commission’s register 151 6.3.1.1. Defi ning the metadata of the Commission’s register 152 6.3.1.2. A proposal: mapping the metadata of the Commission’s register to DCMES 152 6.3.1.3. Th e Commission’s register — DCMES: comments and additional rules 153 6.3.2. A DC crosswalk for the metadata of the Council’s register 153 6.3.2.1. Defi ning the metadata of the Council’s register 153 6.3.2.2. A proposal: mapping the metadata of the Council’s register to DCMES 154 6.3.2.3. Th e Council’s register — DCMES: comments and additional rules 155 6.3.3. A DC crosswalk for the metadata of the Parliament’s register 155 6.3.3.1. Defi ning the metadata of the Parliament’s register 155 6.3.3.2. A proposal: mapping the metadata of the Parliament’s register to DCMES 157 6.3.3.3. Th e Parliament’s register — DCMES: comments and additional rules 157 6.4. A crosswalk for the other tools’ metadata to Dublin Core 158 6.4.1. A DC crosswalk for the PreLex metadata 159 6.4.1.1. Defi ning PreLex metadata 159 6.4.1.2. A proposal: mapping PreLex metadata to DCMES 160 6.4.1.3. PreLex — DCMES: comments and additional rules 161 6.4.2. A DC crosswalk for the metadata of the Legislative Observatory 162 5 Crosswalking EUR-Lex: a proposal for a metadata mapping to improve access to EU documents 6.4.2.1.