DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Measure Value Set Timeliness of Prenatal Care Numerator

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Measure Value Set Timeliness of Prenatal Care Numerator FQHC - 2020 Measure Value Set_Timeliness of Prenatal Care Numerator Numerator Value Set Name Code Definition Code System Prenatal Bundled Services 59400 0 CPT Prenatal Bundled Services 59425 0 CPT Prenatal Bundled Services 59426 0 CPT Prenatal Bundled Services 59510 0 CPT Prenatal Bundled Services 59610 0 CPT Prenatal Bundled Services 59618 0 CPT Prenatal Bundled Prenatal care, at-risk enhanced service package Services H1005 (includes h1001-h1004) (H1005) HCPCS Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 99500 0 CPT Initial prenatal care visit (report at first prenatal encounter with health care professional providing obstetrical care. Report also date of visit and, in a Stand Alone separate field, the date of the last menstrual period Prenatal Visits 0500F [LMP]) (Prenatal) CPT-CAT-II Prenatal flow sheet documented in medical record by first prenatal visit (documentation includes at minimum blood pressure, weight, urine protein, uterine size, fetal heart tones, and estimated date of delivery). Report also: date of visit and, in a separate field, the date of the last menstrual period [LMP] (Note: If reporting 0501F Prenatal flow sheet, Stand Alone it is not necessary to report 0500F Initial prenatal Prenatal Visits 0501F care visit) (Prenatal) CPT-CAT-II Subsequent prenatal care visit (Prenatal) [Excludes: patients who are seen for a condition unrelated to pregnancy or prenatal care (eg, an upper Stand Alone respiratory infection; patients seen for consultation Prenatal Visits 0502F only, not for continuing care)] CPT-CAT-II Stand Alone Prenatal Visits H1000 Prenatal care, at-risk assessment (H1000) HCPCS Stand Alone Prenatal care, at-risk enhanced service; antepartum Prenatal Visits H1001 management (H1001) HCPCS Stand Alone Prenatal care, at risk enhanced service; care Prenatal Visits H1002 coordination (H1002) HCPCS Stand Alone Prenatal care, at-risk enhanced service; education Prenatal Visits H1003 (H1003) HCPCS Stand Alone Prenatal care, at-risk enhanced service; follow-up Prenatal Visits H1004 home visit (H1004) HCPCS Page 1 of 106 January 2020 FQHC - 2020 Measure Value Set_Timeliness of Prenatal Care Numerator Numerator Value Set Name Code Definition Code System Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 17629007 Prenatal care education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal examination and care of mother Prenatal Visits 18114009 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 58932009 Individual natural childbirth education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 66961001 Natural childbirth class education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 134435003 Routine antenatal care (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 135892000 Antenatal education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169712008 Antenatal 12 weeks examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169713003 Antenatal 16 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169714009 Antenatal 20 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169715005 Antenatal 24 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169716006 Antenatal 28 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169717002 Antenatal 30 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169718007 Antenatal 32 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169719004 Antenatal 34 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169720005 Antenatal 35 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169721009 Antenatal 36 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169722002 Antenatal 37 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169723007 Antenatal 38 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169724001 Antenatal 39 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169725000 Antenatal 40 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169726004 Antenatal 41 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 169727008 Antenatal 42 week examination (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171054004 Pregnancy diet education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171055003 Pregnancy smoking education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Page 2 of 106 January 2020 FQHC - 2020 Measure Value Set_Timeliness of Prenatal Care Numerator Numerator Value Set Name Code Definition Code System Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171056002 Pregnancy exercise education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171057006 Pregnancy alcohol education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171058001 Drugs in pregnancy education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171059009 Pregnancy dental education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171060004 Maternity grant education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171061000 Maternity benefit education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171062007 Maternity milk and vitamins education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Pregnancy prescription exemption education Prenatal Visits 171063002 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 171064008 Mothercraft education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 386235000 Childbirth preparation (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 386322007 High risk pregnancy care (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 397931005 Lamaze method education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 406145006 Layette education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 409010002 Antenatal care assessment (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 422808006 Prenatal continuous visit (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 424441002 Prenatal initial visit (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 424525001 Antenatal care (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 424619006 Prenatal visit (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about influenza vaccine during pregnancy Prenatal Visits 439165004 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about toxoplasmosis precautions during Prenatal Visits 439733009 pregnancy (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about travel during pregnancy Prenatal Visits 439816006 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about selection of newborn care provider Prenatal Visits 439908001 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about risk factor identified by prenatal Prenatal Visits 440047008 history (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about indication for prenatal ultrasound Prenatal Visits 440227005 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Page 3 of 106 January 2020 FQHC - 2020 Measure Value Set_Timeliness of Prenatal Care Numerator Numerator Value Set Name Code Definition Code System Stand Alone Education about fetal movement monitoring Prenatal Visits 440309009 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about signs and symptoms of pregnancy Prenatal Visits 440536005 induced hypertension (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about seatbelt use during pregnancy Prenatal Visits 440638004 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about signs and symptoms of preterm Prenatal Visits 440669000 labor (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about medication intake during Prenatal Visits 440670004 pregnancy (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about signs and symptoms of labor Prenatal Visits 440671000 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Education about folic acid in first trimester Prenatal Visits 441839001 (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 700256000 Management of antenatal education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 702396006 Childbirth education (procedure) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Supervision of high risk pregnancy with history of Prenatal Visits 702736005 previous cesarean section (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Supervision of high risk pregnancy with history of Prenatal Visits 702737001 gestational diabetes mellitus (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Prenatal Visits 702738006 Supervision of high risk pregnancy (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Supervision of high risk pregnancy with history of Prenatal Visits 702739003 previous molar pregnancy (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Supervision of high risk pregnancy with history of Prenatal Visits 702740001 previous precipitate labor (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Supervision of high risk pregnancy for multigravida Prenatal Visits 702741002 (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Supervision of high risk pregnancy for social Prenatal Visits 702742009 problem (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition Stand Alone Supervision of high risk pregnancy for multigravida Prenatal Visits 702743004 age 15 years or younger (regime/therapy) SNOMED CT US Edition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Risk L&D
    High Risk L&D, pg 1 of 12 Taking care of patients who have non-reasurring pattern • A non-reassuring pattern is: • no variability • less than 2 accelerations • decelerations • In antepartum setting, you are looking at variable and accelerations • Parameters for 28-32 weeks is different than 32 weeks or greater • What about in labor? • looking for late decels (these are bad) • variability is THE most important thing! • moderate variability shows the CNS is intact • absent variability is no bueno...this would be a big issue if it was moderate before and now has become absent. If pt had medication, then this may not be so much of a concern b/c the meds affects the baby. • minimal may be bad (probably is) • marked is also not good • Category 1: has variablity, maybe a random decel (but most likely none), has accelerations • Category 2: starting to get into a little gray area; physician can proceed forward with usual plan of care; moderate or minimal variability; may have recurring decels (of any type); • Category3 : absent or minimal variability with repetitive late decels; baby is not coping • What’s the first thing you would do if pt had repetitive variable decels? • reposition, increase IV, put Oxygen on mom, call doc (You will reposition b/c the variable decels are d/t cord compression). • You would give O2 if she had decreased variability (according to Dr. Ferguson) • Baby can get late decels from mom lying on her back (so position change), or from having low BP (so give IV bolus). Things you need for precipitous birth • IV • Oxygen • BOA kit (Birth on Arrival kit) What kind of risks are involved with precipitous birth? • Tearing at perineum • Hemorrhage d/t lacerations and such • Pneumothorax (not in boook!).
    [Show full text]
  • Pregnant Woman with Circumvallate Placenta and Suspected Fetal Hypotrophy Caused by Placental Insufficiency: a Case Report
    © Copyright by PMWSZ w Opolu e-ISSN 2544-1620 Medical Science Pulse 2020 (14) 4 Case reports Published online: 31 Dec 2020 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.6735 PREGNANT WOMAN with circumvALLATE PLACENTA AND suspEctED FETAL hypOtrOphy CAusED BY PLACENTAL INsuFFiciENcy: A CASE REPOrt Jadwiga Surówka1 A,B,D–F 1 SSG of Midwifery Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, • ORCID: 0000-0003-0170-8820 Kraków, Poland 2 A,B,D–F 2 Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Dorota Matuszyk Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland • ORCID: 0000-0002-3765-6869 A – study design, B – data collection, C – statistical analysis, D – interpretation of data, E – manuscript preparation, F – literature review, G – sourcing of funding ABSTRACT Background: The circumvallate placenta is a rare pathology of the human placenta that occurs in 1–2% of pregnancies. It is characterized by extrachorial placental development, resulting in a ring formation along the edges of the placenta, which leads to efficiency impairment. As a consequence, it causes an intrauter- ine fetal hypotrophy. The fetal hypotrophic pregnancies are classified as high-risk pregnancies, requiring not only intensive monitoring of fetal development but also maternal and fetal care by the highest reference clinical center. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to analyze the case of a patient with circumvallate placenta and fetal hypotrophy suspicion. Material and methods: The study was based on the case study method. The data was obtained by analyzing medical documentation collected during hospitalization. The patient was interviewed and observed. All of the selected parameters were measured and scaled.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverkids Diagnosis Codes for Pregnancy and Complications of Pregnancy
    CoverKids Diagnosis Codes for Pregnancy and Complications of Pregnancy This list is for informational purposes only and is not a binding or definitive list of covered conditions. It is not a guarantee of coverage; coverage depends on the available benefits and eligibility at the time services are rendered. It is for use only with the CoverKids program. When filing claims, providers should use the most accurate codes for the condition being treated – it is fraud against the State of Tennessee and BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee to intentionally use a code for a covered condition when the treatment provided is for a non- covered condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroscopic Examination of Fetal Appendices in Delivery Room: Good Practice at Panzi Hospital
    International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Walala BD et al. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;9(5):2215-2221 www.ijrcog.org pISSN 2320-1770 | eISSN 2320-1789 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20201841 Clinical Problem Solving Macroscopic examination of fetal appendices in delivery room: good practice at Panzi hospital Boengandi Walala D.1*, Nyakio Ngeleza O.1, Mukanire Ntakwinja B.1, Raha Maroyi K.1, Katenga Bosunga G.2, Mukwege Mukengere D.1 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Panzi Hospital, School of Medicine, Evangelical University in Africa, Bukavu, DR Congo 2Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kisangani University Clinics, School of Medicine, Kisangani University, Kisangani, DR Congo Received: 14 January 2020 Revised: 20 February 2020 Accepted: 28 February 2020 *Correspondence: Dr. Boengandi Walala D., E-mail: [email protected] Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT The review of fetal appendices is described in the literature, and its importance is well established. Indeed, pathological findings in the placenta can provide information on the pathogenesis of the fetus, including intrauterine growth retardation, mental retardation or neurodevelopmental disorders. This helps to understand a child's disability, but also maternal complications such as preeclampsia. Despite the relevant information provided by the various studies, fetal appendices are not systematically examined in several maternity hospitals in our country, DR Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • Pregnant Woman with Circumvallate Placenta and Suspected Fetal Hypotrophy Caused by Placental Insufficiency: a Case Report
    © Copyright by PMWSZ w Opolu e-ISSN 2544-1620 Medical Science Pulse 2020 (14) 4 Case reports Published online: 31 Dec 2020 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.6735 PREGNANT WOMAN with circumvALLATE PLACENTA AND suspEctED FETAL hypOtrOphy CAusED BY PLACENTAL INsuFFiciENcy: A CASE REPOrt Jadwiga Surówka1 A,B,D–F 1 SSG of Midwifery Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, • ORCID: 0000-0003-0170-8820 Kraków, Poland 2 A,B,D–F 2 Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Dorota Matuszyk Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland • ORCID: 0000-0002-3765-6869 A – study design, B – data collection, C – statistical analysis, D – interpretation of data, E – manuscript preparation, F – literature review, G – sourcing of funding ABSTRACT Background: The circumvallate placenta is a rare pathology of the human placenta that occurs in 1–2% of pregnancies. It is characterized by extrachorial placental development, resulting in a ring formation along the edges of the placenta, which leads to efficiency impairment. As a consequence, it causes an intrauter- ine fetal hypotrophy. The fetal hypotrophic pregnancies are classified as high-risk pregnancies, requiring not only intensive monitoring of fetal development but also maternal and fetal care by the highest reference clinical center. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to analyze the case of a patient with circumvallate placenta and fetal hypotrophy suspicion. Material and methods: The study was based on the case study method. The data was obtained by analyzing medical documentation collected during hospitalization. The patient was interviewed and observed. All of the selected parameters were measured and scaled.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Placental Abnormalities Review
    ISSN: 2641-6247 DOI: 10.33552/WJGWH.2021.05.000608 World Journal of Gynecology & Women’s Health Review Article Copyright © All rights are reserved by Noam Lazebnik Common Placental Abnormalities Review Noam Lazebnik* Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, USA Received Date: July 26, 2021 *Corresponding author: Noam Lazebnik, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, USA. Published Date: September 03, 2021 Introduction The placenta is comprised of specialized epithelial cell types, collectively referred to as trophoblast cells, situated velamentous fashion, or in between the lobes. While there is no among mesenchymal cells and vasculature, at the maternal-fetal increased risk of fetal anomalies with this abnormality, bilobed interface. Trophoblast stem and progenitor cell populations placentas can be associated with retained placental tissue. give rise to specialized trophoblast cell lineages these cells accessory lobes develop in the membranes apart from the main differentiate into trophoblast giant cells, spongiotrophoblast Succenturiate placenta is a condition in which one or more cells, glycogen trophoblast cells, invasive trophoblast cells, and The vessels are supported only by communicating membranes. If placental body to which vessels of fetal origin usually connect them. syncytiotrophoblast. the communicating membranes do not have vessels, it is called placenta supuria. Advanced maternal age and in vitro fertilization Trophoblast cells are specialized cell types capable
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Measure Up/Pressure Down National Hypertension Campaign
    Measure Up/Pressure Down National Hypertension Campaign American Medical Group Foundation Version 3.0 • October 2015 Appendix B Appendix B: ICD-10-CM Codes for Pregnancy Exclusion Source: HEDIS® Pregnancy Value Set Code Only Code and Description O00.0 [O00.0] Abdominal pregnancy O00.1 [O00.1] Tubal pregnancy O00.2 [O00.2] Ovarian pregnancy O00.8 [O00.8] Other ectopic pregnancy O00.9 [O00.9] Ectopic pregnancy, unspecified O01.0 [O01.0] Classical hydatidiform mole O01.1 [O01.1] Incomplete and partial hydatidiform mole O01.9 [O01.9] Hydatidiform mole, unspecified O02.0 [O02.0] Blighted ovum and nonhydatidiform mole O02.1 [O02.1] Missed abortion O02.81 [O02.81] Inappropriate change in quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in early pregnancy O02.89 [O02.89] Other abnormal products of conception O02.9 [O02.9] Abnormal product of conception, unspecified O03.0 [O03.0] Genital tract and pelvic infection following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.1 [O03.1] Delayed or excessive hemorrhage following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.2 [O03.2] Embolism following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.30 [O03.30] Unspecified complication following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.31 [O03.31] Shock following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.32 [O03.32] Renal failure following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.33 [O03.33] Metabolic disorder following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.34 [O03.34] Damage to pelvic organs following incomplete spontaneous abortion O03.35 [O03.35] Other venous complications following incomplete spontaneous
    [Show full text]
  • Prenatal Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Circumvallate Placenta
    Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of circumvallate placenta Kirbas A, Uygur D, Erkaya S, Yakut HI, Danisman N Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey Objective Circumvallate placenta is rarely seen and it is associated with a high incidence of perinatal complications such as preterm birth, preterm rupture of membranes and placental abruption. We present a case of circumvallate placenta diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound in a 23 year old pregnant woman. Methods Case presentation. Results This lady was referred to our perinatology unit at 33 week's gestation for vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. There were slight vaginal bleeding and minimal uterine contractions. Ultrasonographic examination revealed a single live fetus compatible with gestational age and circumvallate placenta (Fig 1). She received two doses of dexamethasone for accelerating fetal lung maturation. Two days later she was discharged and informed about the risks. Two weeks after, she represented with premature rupture of membranes and bleeding. There was a severe abdominal pain with intense bleeding. She was delivered by emergency cesarean section due to a suspicion of placental abruption. A baby was delivered with APGAR scores of 6 and 8, weighing 2300 g at 33 weeks' gestation. The fetal surface of the placenta showed a marginal fold of the chorion and a projection of villous tissue beyond the edge of the chorion plate. The circumvallate placenta was obvious in macroscopic views (Fig 2). Conclusion Circumvallate placenta is a rare placental disorder occurring in approximately 1–2% of all pregnancies. In circumvallate placenta, the membranes of the chorion do not insert at the edge of the placenta but at some distance inward from the margin, toward the umbilical cord.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Outcome After Spontaneous First Trimester Intra-Amniotic Haematoma and Early Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes
    Successful Outcome After Spontaneous First Trimester Intra-amniotic Haematoma and Early Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Journal: BMJ Case Reports Manuscript ID bcr-2018-224596.R2 Manuscript Type: Rare disease Date Submitted by the Author: 13-Aug-2018 Complete List of Authors: Bakalis, Spyros; Guy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Obstetrics, Maternal and Fetal Medicine David , Anna ; University College London, EGA Institute for Women's Health; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Keywords: Obstetrics and gynaecology, Pregnancy < Obstetrics and gynaecology Page 1 of 14 Full cases template and Checklist for authors Full clinical cases submission template TITLE OF CASE Do not include “a case report” Successful Outcome After Spontaneous First Trimester Intra-amniotic Haematoma and Early Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. SUMMARY Up to 150 words summarising the case presentation and outcome (this will be freely available online) Spontaneous intra-amniotic haematoma is a rare cause of preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) but can have significant fetal and maternal consequences. It has been previously been reported to occur in the second and third trimesters but not in an earlier gestation. We present a case that presented acutely in the first trimester of pregnancy, which lead to early PPROM at 15 weeks and spontaneous preterm delivery at 28 weeks of gestation. There were no maternal complications during the pregnancy. BACKGROUND Why you think this case is important – why did you write it up? Intra-amniotic haematoma, in the absence of trauma or amniocentesis, is a very rare event. It is thought to occur due to either a subchorionic or subamniotic haematoma which dissects through the amnion and into the amniotic cavity.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Umbilical Cord and Placental Abnormalities 1Autumn J Broady, 2Marguerite Lisa Bartholomew
    DSJUOG Structural Umbilical10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1439 Cord and Placental Abnormalities REVIEW ARTICLE Structural Umbilical Cord and Placental Abnormalities 1Autumn J Broady, 2Marguerite Lisa Bartholomew ABSTRACT it is typically diagnosed when the cord inserts within 2,4 The human placenta and umbilical cord are short lived organs 1 to 2 cm from the placental edge. Marginal umbilical that are indispensable for the growth and maturation of the cord insertions are more common than velamentous developing fetus. When there is normal placental and cord cord insertions, accounting for 88% of all abnormal cord function, maternal, fetal, childhood, and adult health is more insertions. Insertion of the cord within the placental common. Examination of the placenta and umbilical cord may be considered secondary to the fetal examination by membranes before reaching the placenta is known as 1 sonographers. Ultrasound professionals must be cognizant of velamentous type of cord insertion. It occurs in 1 to 2% the importance of sonographic examination and documentation of singleton pregnancies, and can be found in up to 15% of the structure of the placenta and umbilical cord. This paper of monochorionic twin gestations.4 reviews several of the most common structure placental and umbilical cord abnormalities that are detectable with two dimensional ultrasound. Risk Factors for Marginal or Velamentous Cord Insertions Keywords: Abnormal umbilical cord insertions, Circumvallate placenta, Single umbilical artery, Umbilical cord coiling, Vasa Rates of abnormal cord insertions are generally higher for previa. twin (both dichorionic and monochorionic) vs singleton How to cite this article: Broady AJ, Bartholomew ML. Structural gestations as well as in patients requiring assisted Umbilical Cord and Placental Abnormalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr.Ssa Marta Angelini ASUIUD Early Placental Development
    Dr.ssa Marta Angelini ASUIUD Early placental development . approximately day 7 after fertilization: - blastocyst attaches to the endometrial epithelium at the embryonic pole of the blastocyst - the syncytiotrophoblast cells start to penetrate and invade the endometrial connective tissue. approximately day 9 after fertilization: - the blastocyst implants in the endometrium. Note the formation of extensive syncytiotrophoblasts at the embryonic pole, the start of invasion of endometrial glands, and the formation of lacunae. Radiographics. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):642-657. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170062. most common placental implantation abnormalities (PIAs) - placenta previa (complete or incomplete) - marginal/low-lying placenta, placenta accreta - placentl morphology variations - vasa previa - velamentous cord insertion PIAs account for 5.6 - 8.7% of indicated preterm deliveries at <35 weeks’ gestation After ischemic placental disease (preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and placental abruption), second most common cause for indicated preterm delivery In symptomatic patients the timing and severity of symptomatology (ie, bleeding, labor, rupture of membranes) determines the gestational age at delivery. Even in asymptomatic patients, preterm delivery is recommended in virtually every case to avoid maternal and/or fetal complications. Cesarean delivery is one of the most common of all surgical procedures, (+/- 30% USA) One of the consequences of increasing cesarean delivery rates over the last few decades is an increase in PIAs. This implies that we should not expect any reductions of preterm de-liveries due to PIAs in the near future. It is important to focus on strategies of how to improve the management of these patients. Vintzileos. Using ultrasound in clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumvallate Placenta: Associated Clinical Manifestations and Complications—A Retrospective Study
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Obstetrics and Gynecology International Volume 2014, Article ID 986230, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/986230 Research Article Circumvallate Placenta: Associated Clinical Manifestations and Complications—A Retrospective Study Hanako Taniguchi,1 Shigeru Aoki,1 Kentaro Sakamaki,2 Kentaro Kurasawa,1 Mika Okuda,1 Tsuneo Takahashi,1 and Fumiki Hirahara3 1 Perinatal Center for Maternity and Neonate, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafunecyou, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan 2 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine and University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Shigeru Aoki; [email protected] Received 20 March 2014; Revised 10 October 2014; Accepted 27 October 2014; Published 13 November 2014 Academic Editor: Everett Magann Copyright © 2014 Hanako Taniguchi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Aims. To analyze the pregnancy outcomes of circumvallate placenta retrospectively and to predict circumvallate placenta during pregnancy based on its clinical features. Methods. The pregnancy outcomes of 92 women with circumvallate placenta who delivered live singletons at a tertiary care center between January 2000 and September 2012 were compared with those of 9057 controls. Results. Women with circumvallate placenta were associated with higher incidences of preterm delivery (64.1%), placental abruption (10.9%), emergency cesarean section (45.6%), small-for-gestational age (36.9%), neonatal death (8.9%), neonatal intensive care unit admission (55.4%), and chronic lung disease (33.9%).
    [Show full text]