Assessment of Technology Options to Address

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment of Technology Options to Address Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology Assessment of Technological Options to Address Climate Change A Report for the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit December 20, 2002 Note: This report was commissioned by the UK Government as a piece of independent research and is being circulated to inform and stimulate debate. The report is not a statement of the UK's government policy. ICCEPT Assessment of technological options to address climate change 2 ICCEPT Assessment of technological options to address climate change Contents Preface Executive Summary Part I: Overview and Main Findings 1. Introduction 2. The scale of the challenge and the role of innovation: energy, development and carbon emissions 3. Technological options: a summary 4. Delivering technology options: drivers and enablers 5. Conclusions: The opportunities ahead Part II: Technologies and Practices: An Assessment of Options 6. Low carbon primary energy resources Renewable energy technologies Nuclear power Carbon sequestration 7. Reducing primary energy demand through greater efficiency Buildings, appliances and vehicles Energy conversion and supply: Advanced fossil fuel technologies, fuel cells 8. New energy systems and facilitating technologies Energy storage The changing nature of electricity grids Hydrogen production, storage and use Systems innovation: the role of hydrogen and new ‘energy vectors’ 9. Assessment and cross-cutting issues 3 ICCEPT Assessment of technological options to address climate change 4 ICCEPT Assessment of technological options to address climate change Preface This report was produced in October 2002 at the request of the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. It aims to analyse the potential of low carbon technologies for delivering deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions worldwide by 2050. The terms of reference requested information on: · The likely quantitative contribution of the various technologies and their costs · Key obstacles to uptake · Which technologies are best suited for different parts of the world, with reference to the OECD economies, Russia, Asia, Africa and developing regions · The technologies with the greatest potential · Factors that would affect the adoption of the technologies identified · Implications for economic growth · Challenges ahead and suggested further actions The report shows why the climate change problem could be addressed through both national and international commitments to the development and use of low carbon technologies and practices – defined here as technologies and practices that avoid or reduce net emissions of CO2 to the atmosphere. It reviews why numerous studies have concluded that countries can aspire to achieving economic prosperity on a broad basis, and the OECD countries to raising their economic livelihoods further, while addressing the climate change problem. The report has benefited from comments on early drafts from experts from industry, government and academia. In addition, a workshop on regional aspects was convened by the Carbon Trust on 29th October 2002, and an expert workshop was run by the Strategy Unit on 1 November. Persons consulted are listed at the end of the document, as are the main contributors from Imperial College London, Warwick University Business School, Future Energy Solutions and NERA. We have also benefited from ongoing work at the Department of Trade and Industry on UK energy policies. We are immensely grateful to all involved for their time and expertise. The report cannot do full justice to the enormous range of issues and options involved in rising to the challenge of reducing carbon emissions. Nor can it possibly be encyclopaedic. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors alone. December 20, 2002 5 ICCEPT Assessment of technological options to address climate change 6 ICCEPT Assessment of technological options to address climate change Executive Summary The challenge Under existing policies carbon dioxide emissions from energy use will increase substantially over the coming 50 years. The increases will be greatest in the developing countries: their energy consumption per capita is very low compared to that of the industrialised countries, they have 2 billion people without access to modern energy forms, and will need far more energy to achieve economic prosperity. With economic growth world electricity demand could expand four-fold relative to today’s level – equivalent to 10 times the installed capacity in the US, or 120 times that of the UK. World oil consumption would also rise to several times levels found in the US and Europe today, unless alternatives to oil can be found. But growth in CO2 emissions is not inevitable. The IPCC reviewed global emissions in 140 scenarios, and industry, international organisations and governments too have published their own analyses, as has the G8 Task Force on Renewable Energy. Their main conclusion is that we could move to a low carbon emissions path, and achieve a virtually zero carbon energy system in the long term, if we used energy more efficiently and if we developed and used low carbon technologies and practices. This is technologically and economically feasible. Profound changes occurred in energy production and use in the last 50 years, and profound changes seem equally likely in the years ahead when we examine emerging technologies. Technology options Reductions of emissions could be achieved by improving energy efficiency and by using low carbon-emitting energy sources. Fundamental changes in the infrastructure by which energy is supplied and used would also be needed. Energy efficiency It is estimated that one-half of future emissions, relative to trends, could be eliminated through efficiency gains, perhaps more with technical progress and if the uptake of technologies is encouraged through energy policies. Examples of options already available abound in building design, appliances, lighting technologies and transport. But the possibilities for further improvement through innovation are far from exhausted. For example, transport accounts for around ¼ of CO2 emissions, and for the bulk of the 3.5 billion tonnes of oil consumed in the world today. The ‘well to wheels’ efficiency of vehicles is 15%; new technologies such as fuel cell and hybrid- electric vehicles would double this. The use of natural gas will also be associated with large gains in energy efficiency, and is the ‘fuel of choice’ for power generation and heating in homes and industry for those countries with good access to it. It would reduce CO2 emissions directly given the lower carbon content of gas relative to oil and coal, and it has several other environmental advantages. But given the dependence of large countries such as India and China on coal, and their more limited access to gas, high efficiency coal 7 ICCEPT Assessment of technological options to address climate change technologies will also be important; those based on coal gasification may open up a path towards hydrogen production (see below). Low carbon energy sources There are three main options: renewable energy, nuclear energy, and fossil fuels with the carbon being separated out and sequestered. Renewable energy The resource is very large. For example, solar energy alone could meet world energy demand using less than 1% of land now under crops and pasture. Of course there is no need to occupy such land, since deserts and rooftops can be used for solar technologies, and several other options show great promise—wind, tidal stream, wave, geothermal energy. Biomass energy can be derived from agricultural and forest wastes, and biomass plantations can also be used to help restore degraded land and watersheds. Most of the technologies are technologically viable and many are well proven, but with exceptions their costs are high relative to fossil fuels. However, cost trends are encouraging; for example the cost of wind has fallen fourfold since the mid 1980s. Most technologies are in their infancy and there is appreciable potential for further reductions through innovation and batch production. The issue of intermittency will need to be addressed if the solar and wind technologies are to provide energy on the scale required. This will require the development of storage technologies, such as hydrogen, and changes to the way power grids are operated. Nuclear energy Nuclear fission is a familiar and well tested option; it accounts for 7% of the world’s primary energy production and 17% of its electricity production. We now have more than 40 years of operating experience with the technology. New smaller reactors, with improved safety characteristics are now being developed. The difficulties with its wider scale deployment in response to the climate change problem lie as much with the much-discussed and unresolved issues of nuclear wastes, safety, decommissioning and proliferation, as with reactor size and efficiency. For these reasons many of the studies reviewed here assign to it a secondary role or conclude that it cannot be relied upon for achieving major reductions in carbon emissions over the long term. Nuclear fusion is thought unlikely to be available commercially for 25 or probably 50 years. Hydrogen production from fossil fuels with carbon sequestration It is possible to separate out the CO2 from fossil fuels for geological storage in depleted oil or gas reservoirs, coal beds (for enhanced methane recovery) or deep saline aquifers. Doing so is a promising way to make hydrogen. These possibilities are attracting much interest since they would
Recommended publications
  • Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
    Exhibit 21 Initiative arbon Tracker Carbon supply cost curves: Evaluating financial risk to gas capital expenditures About Carbon Tracker Acknowledgements Disclaimer The Carbon Tracker Initiative (CTI) is a financial Authored by James Leaton, Andrew Grant, Matt Carbon Tracker is a non-profit company set-up not for profit financial think-tank. Its goal is to Gray, Luke Sussams, with communications advice to produce new thinking on climate risk. The align the capital markets with the risks of climate from Stefano Ambrogi and Margherita Gagliardi organisation is funded by a range of European and change. Since its inception in 2009 Carbon Tracker at Carbon Tracker. This paper is a summary which American foundations. Carbon Tracker is not an has played a pioneering role in popularising the draws on research conducted in partnership with investment adviser, and makes no representation concepts of the carbon bubble, unburnable carbon Energy Transition Advisors, ETA, led by Mark Fulton, regarding the advisability of investing in any and stranded assets. These concepts have entered with Paul Spedding. particular company or investment fund or other the financial lexicon and are being taken increasingly vehicle. A decision to invest in any such investment The underlying analysis in this report prepared seriously by a range of financial institutions including fund or other entity should not be made in by Carbon Tracker and ETA is based on supply investment banks, ratings agencies, pension funds reliance on any of the statements set forth in this cost data licensed from Wood Mackenzie Limited. and asset managers. publication. While the organisations have obtained Wood Mackenzie is a global leader in commercial information believed to be reliable, they shall not intelligence for the energy, metals and mining Contact be liable for any claims or losses of any nature industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Solar Leaders and UNEP Outline Central Role for Solar in Climate Solution at United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poland
    December 8, 2008 Global Solar Leaders and UNEP Outline Central Role for Solar in Climate Solution at United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poland POZNAN, Poland, Dec 08, 2008 /PRNewswire-Asia via COMTEX News Network/ -- Representatives from three leading international solar companies and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) -- Dr. Zhengrong Shi, Suntech's Chairman and CEO, Jeremy Leggett, Executive Chairman of Solarcentury, Mike Ahearn, Chairman and CEO of First Solar, and Achim Steiner, UNEP Executive Director -- gathered at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poznan, Poland to propose the rapid implementation and expansion of policies designed to support the growth of the solar industry and the global adoption of solar technology as a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction in support of global climate goals. The four representatives stated that solar technology is already a cost-effective alternative for generating electricity and countries world-wide should immediately revise energy development plans to include a higher proportion of this clean and sustainable energy source: "Solar technology is no longer a niche energy solution, but is already reaching the scale and cost points to fundamentally change the way we generate electricity. As a result of substantial investments over the past 5 years, the solar industry has dramatically improved solar technologies and established roadmaps for further cost reductions. In fact, electricity generated from solar installations is already reaching parity with peak energy and retail energy prices in many regions." "Now is the time for world leaders, businesses and communities to build the platform for solar to be adopted on a much greater scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Repowering Indiana Weekly - 2/23/07
    Repowering Indiana Weekly - 2/23/07 Published by: Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana Editor: Christi Barber IN THIS ISSUE: Local • Area residents confronted with “An Inconvenient Truth” • Live the Question, Promote the Solution • State lawmakers want to delay ruling on Cliffside • Lawmaker wants review before NIPSCO sale Nation • Schools to use power produced by solar panels • Berea College dedicates solar array installation • ISU Plans Renewable Energy Studies • Acore Launches Program Bringing America’s Young Renewable Energy Professionals to Las Vegas • Colorado schools, federal lab to cooperate on renewable energy • Nevada Regulators Approve Geothermal PPA • 100th Residential Solar PV Installation Milestone Reached in Connecticut • Idaho Public Utilities Commission approves wind energy projects for Elmore County • U.S. Solar Energy Demand to Triple • GE to Supply 300 Turbines to Noble’s NY Wind Projects • FPL Energy and Texas College to Train Wind Engineers • Transmission Loop to Bring 4,200 MW of Wind Energy to Texas • Renewable energy in Colorado- pond scum and geothermal • Low-interest loans available from municipal utilities • Colorado PUC Approves First-of-a-Kind Solar Energy Contract • Air Force’s green-power use lauded • $61 million project a start to ending use of petroleum • Board approves wind energy partnership • Wind energy plant considers West Branch • US needs to plan for climate change-induced summer droughts • GDP And SunShine Plus Provide YMCA With Backup Solar Power • PA DEP Secretary Dedicates Solar Power System at DEP Southeast Regional Office • Belmar project goes solar • CUNY Study Finds Solar Energy Can Help NYC World • Green building goals under the spotlight • 'Energy-rich' B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Risky Business: Insurance Companies in Global Warming Politics • Matthew Paterson*
    MatthewRisky Business Paterson Risky Business: Insurance Companies in Global Warming Politics • Matthew Paterson* Observations that the interest in global warming shown by insurance compa- nies could transform the political dynamics of global warming have been wide- spread. In various contexts, different writers have argued or suggested that the emergence of insurance companies in climate politics could facilitate more ag- gressive greenhouse gas abatement than would otherwise be the case. In some of the policy-oriented literature, Flavin and Tunali, for example, state that at the ªrst Conference of the Parties in Berlin in 1995: a more progressive conºuence of political forces [than the coalition of fossil- fuel dependent countries and companies] began to assert itself—promi- nently featuring the insurance and banking industries. As a business on the frontline of society’s most risky activities, the insurance industry has a long tradition of spurring policy changes to help reduce society’s risks.1 Journalistic accounts, such as Paul Brown’s Global Warming or Ross Gelbspan’s The Heat is On, express similar optimism, with Gelbspan writing: “It is the world’s insurers...whoareleading the frontline opposition against the fossil fuel industry.”2 Paul Brown, in a press conference with insurers at the Kyoto Conference in 1997, asked the (perhaps falsely naive) question: “So have you made any decision not to invest in Exxon yet?” reºecting this optimism.3 Many of the limited range of academic works that address the phenomenon also express such
    [Show full text]
  • Fafb7d5750d641228c13987ae62
    Government of India Ministry of New & Renewable Energy Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Block-14, CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 003, INDIA Telephone: 91-11-24361298, 24360404 & 24360707 Fax: 91-11-24361298 Government of India Website: www.mnre.gov.in, www.direc2010.gov.in Photographs Courtesy International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) & Mutual PR Agency Cover Design Karmic Designs DIREC We2010 Would Like to Thank Our Partner Ministries Our Partner Network Our Partner Countries Ministry of Urban Development Ministry of Science and Technology Ministry of Environment and Forests Ministry of Power Ministry of External Affairs Germany Norway Government of India Our Associate Organisations & Associations ROSHINI A Catalyst for Sustainable Habitats v Preface Government of India hosted Delhi International Renewable Energy Conference (DIREC) 2010, the fourth in the series of global Ministerial-level Conference on Renewable Energy from 27th to 29th October, 2010. The conference followed from the initiative taken at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg and also builds up on the initiatives taken in various IRECs held in Bonn (Renewables 2004), Beijing (BIREC 2005) and Washington (WIREC 2008) to highlight the significance of renewable energy. DIREC 2010 was an effort to provide an important forum for international discourse on renewable energy. Accordingly, the conference was carefully divided into four major themes - Technology & Infrastructure, Policy, Finance and Renewable, Access & MDGs. The overwhelming response received from the international community reiterated the significance of ‘Up scaling and Mainstreaming Renewables for Energy Security, Climate Change and Economic Development’, which was also the theme of the conference. It also showcased that the strides made in this sector have surpassed predictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Energy – Without the Hot Air
    Sustainable Energy – without the hot air David J.C. MacKay Draft 2.9.0 – August 28, 2008 Department of Physics University of Cambridge http://www.withouthotair.com/ ii Back-cover blurb Sustainable energy — without the hot air Category: Science. How can we replace fossil fuels? How can we ensure security of energy supply? How can we solve climate change? We’re often told that “huge amounts of renewable power are available” – wind, wave, tide, and so forth. But our current power consumption is also huge! To understand our sustainable energy crisis, we need to know how the one “huge” compares with the other. We need numbers, not adjectives. In this book, David MacKay, Professor in Physics at Cambridge Univer- sity, shows how to estimate the numbers, and what those numbers depend on. As a case study, the presentation focuses on the United Kingdom, ask- ing first “could Britain live on sustainable energy resources alone?” and second “how can Britain make a realistic post-fossil-fuel energy plan that The author, July 2008. adds up?” Photo by David Stern. These numbers bring home the size of the changes that society must undergo if sustainable living is to be achieved. Don’t be afraid of this book’s emphasis on numbers. It’s all basic stuff, accessible to high school students, policy-makers and the thinking pub- lic. To have a meaningful discussion about sustainable energy, we need numbers. This is Draft 2.9.0 (August 28, 2008). You are looking at the low- resolution edition (i.e., some images are low-resolution to save bandwidth).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Themed Books for Adults*
    Environmentally Themed Books for Adults* *The City of Roanoke does not endorse any books on this list; they are provided merely as a starting point for your own investigation. Collected from various sources, 2015. NON-FICTION Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness by Edward Abbey Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World - Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran It by Ken Alibek The Bleeding of the Stone by Ibrahim al-Koni Enviro-Capitalists: Doing Good While Doing Well by Terry Lee Anderson and Donald R. Leal Free Market Environmentalism by Terry L. Anderson and Donald R. Leal Babylon's Ark: The Incredible Wartime Rescue of the Baghdad Zoo by Lawrence Anthony and Graham Spence Earth from the Air by Yann Arthus-Bertrand Our Angry Earth: A Ticking Ecological Bomb by Isaac Asimov and Frederik Pohl State of the World 2010: Transforming Cultures: From Consumerism to Sustainability by Erik Assadourian et al Wild Solutions: How Biodiversity is Money in the Bank by Andrew Beattie and Paul R. Ehrlich Environmental Principles and Policies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction by Sharon Beder Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism by Sharon Beder Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems by Michael Begon et al The Coming Global Superstorm by Art Bell and Whitley Strieber Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion (4th edition) by Milton R. Beychok Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants by Milton R. Beychok Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • JEREMY LEGGETT the Future and Renewable Energy There Are Two
    JEREMY LEGGETT The future and renewable energy There are two reasons why society has to get out of oil, and at first look they seem contradictory. One: it is running out. Two: we cannot afford to burn it all, writes Jeremy Leggett* This piece is the fourth and final curtain raiser to a pioneering multidisciplinary meeting being convened at the Geological and Royal Societies in October and November this year. Entitled Challenges and Solutions: UK energy to 2050, a two-day meeting at Burlington House will first attempt to look at all elements in the energy equation, and to produce answers - in a report to be published during a half-day event at the Royal Society one month later. For further details and a First Circular, please go to the Events Section of www.geolsoc.org.uk. All those attending the two-day session in Burlington House will be entitled to attend the public meeting in the Royal Society. As almost every geologist knows, oil is running out because it is a finite resource1. Much rests on when the ‘topping-out point’ – peak of production – will occur. Those who tell us it is far off include the US Department of Energy and most in the oil companies. Let’s call them the ‘late toppers’. They profess that some 2–2.7 trillion barrels of conventional oil are left in known deposits and predictable future discoveries. At the other end of the spectrum are the ‘early toppers’, such as the industry insiders in the Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas, who reckon on more like one trillion barrels.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Ngos in Danger of Sabotaging the Talks
    ft.com > comment > blogs > Sign in Site tour Register Subscribe Energy Source This blog Search Home UK World Companies Markets Global Economy Lex Comment Management Personal Finance Life & Arts Columnists Analysis Opinion The A-List Editorial Blogs Letters Corrections Obituaries Tools Climate experts’ forum: Are NGOs in danger of Print Email Share Clip this sabotaging the talks? December 10, 2009 6:20 pm by FT Energy Source 0 0 0 Insight into the financial, economic and policy aspects of energy and the environment. FT Energy Source is posting a daily question for our panel of expert commentators. Below are responses from panel members Kyoto carbon markets August 2011: Energy Source is no longer updated but it architect Graciela Chichilnisky, Jeremy Leggett of Solarcentury, Lord Browne of remains open as an archive. the Royal Academy of Engineering and Vivienne Cox of Climate Change Capital. Read our farewell note Non-government organisations (NGOs) have been sounding the alarm About the blog over details of a possible agreement at Copenhagen, and attacking some of the mechanisms for tackling climate change, such as carbon trading. Are they in danger of sabotaging the talks? Jeremy Leggett: NGOs on both sides of the fence are in danger of sabotaging the talks, and always have been through the 20 years of their history. Business NGOs include organisations who would agree wholeheartedly with Sarah Palin’s call on President Barack Obama, in yesterday’s Washington Post, to boycott the summit. Such organisations, often representing US coal and oil interests, have long sought to detonate mines under the fragile process of multilateral consensus building on global warming.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Renewable Energy and Fall of Nuclear Power Competition of Low Carbon Technologies
    The Rise of Renewable Energy and Fall of Nuclear Power Competition of Low Carbon Technologies February 2019 REI – Renewable Energy Institute Renewable Energy Institute is a non-profit organization which aims to build a sustainable, rich society based on renewable energy. It was established in August 2011, in the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, by its founder Mr. Masayoshi Son, Chairman & CEO of SoftBank Corp., with his own private resources. The Institute is engaged in activities such as; research-based analyses on renewable energy, policy recommendations, building a platform for discussions among stakeholders, and facilitating knowledge exchange and joint action with international and domestic partners. Authors Romain Zissler, Senior Researcher at Renewable Energy Institute Mika Ohbayashi, Director at Renewable Energy Institute (Part II, “Spent nuclear fuel,” 69-72 pp.) Editor Masaya Ishida, Manager, Renewable Energy Business Group at Renewable Energy Institute Acknowledgements The author of this report would like to thank individuals and representatives of organizations who have assisted him in the production of this report by providing materials and/or granting authorizations to use the content of their work. The quality of this report greatly benefits from their valuable contributions. Among these people are: Mycle Schneider and his team working on the World Nuclear Industry Status Report – an annual publication, and key reference tracking nuclear power developments across the world – who allowed Renewable Energy Institute to use some contents of the World Nuclear Industry Status Report including reproduction of illustrations. And Bloomberg NEF, the global authority on economic data on energy investments, who allowed Renewable Energy Institute to make use of Bloomberg NEF’s data.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Creation in Private Markets Assessing Underlying Companies Annual Report 2013 in a Secondary Transaction
    Rocco Sgobbo Head Investment Solutions Southeast Asia, Bastian Wolff Private Real Estate, Claude Angéloz Co-Head Private Real Estate, Choon Wah Wong Private Real Estate VALUE CREATION IN PRIVATE MARKETS ASSESSING UNDERLYING COMPANIES ANNUAL REPORT 2013 IN A SECONDARY TRANSACTION Julien Marencic Private Equity Secondaries, Stephan Schäli Head Private Equity, Jochen Weirich Investment Solutions Europe and Adam Howarth Co-Head Private Equity Secondaries Passion for Private Markets Passion for Private Markets PARTNERS GROUP – ANNUAL REPORT 2013 – ANNUAL GROUP PARTNERS ZUG | SAN FR ANCISCO | NEW YORK | SAO PAULO | LONDON | GUERNSEY | PARIS | LUXEMBOURG | MILAN | MUNICH | DUBAI | SINGAPORE | SHANGHAI | SEOUL | TOKYO | SYDNEY Rocco Sgobbo Head Investment Solutions Southeast Asia, Bastian Wolff Private Real Estate, Claude Angéloz Co-Head Private Real Estate, Choon Wah Wong Private Real Estate VALUE CREATION IN PRIVATE MARKETS ASSESSING UNDERLYING COMPANIES ANNUAL REPORT 2013 IN A SECONDARY TRANSACTION Julien Marencic Private Equity Secondaries, Stephan Schäli Head Private Equity, Jochen Weirich Investment Solutions Europe and Adam Howarth Co-Head Private Equity Secondaries Passion for Private Markets Passion for Private Markets PARTNERS GROUP – ANNUAL REPORT 2013 – ANNUAL GROUP PARTNERS ZUG | SAN FR ANCISCO | NEW YORK | SAO PAULO | LONDON | GUERNSEY | PARIS | LUXEMBOURG | MILAN | MUNICH | DUBAI | SINGAPORE | SHANGHAI | SEOUL | TOKYO | SYDNEY 2 147 KEY FIGURES CONTACTS Zug: San Francisco: 1 Investor relations 2012 2013 Zugerstrasse 57 150 Spear
    [Show full text]
  • REN21 Renewables Global Futures Report (Print Version)
    RENEWABLES GLOBAL FUTURES REPORT 2013 REN21 – Renewable Energy Policy ISEP – Institute for Sustainable Energy Network for the 21st Century Policies REN21 is a global multi-stakeholder network that connects The Institute for Sustainable Energy Policies (ISEP) is an inde- a wide range of key actors from governments, international pendent, non-profit research organization located in Tokyo, organizations, industry associations, science and academia as Japan. ISEP was founded in 2000, and since then has become well as civil society to facilitate knowledge exchange, policy a strong voice and source of innovative research in Japan and development, and joint action towards a rapid global transition worldwide. At its core, ISEP aims to provide the resources and to renewable energy. REN21 promotes renewable energy to services necessary for policymaking towards a sustainable meet the needs of both industrialized and developing countries energy future. Three focal areas are promotion of renewable that are driven by climate change, energy security, economic energy, improvement of energy efficiency, and restructuring development, and poverty alleviation. energy markets. REN21 is committed to providing policy-relevant information In Japan, ISEP engages in a wide range of programs and activi- and research-based analysis on renewable energy to decision ties, including policy recommendations on renewable energy and makers from both public and private sectors to catalyze policy energy efficiency to the Japanese government, guidance and change. REN21 also provides a platform for interconnection advice to local municipalities, and public events, conferences, between multi-stakeholder actors working in the renewable and symposia. In addition, ISEP facilitates community-level energy field, and works to bridge existing gaps to increase the renewable energy projects through a "Citizens' Fund" and deployment of renewable energy worldwide.
    [Show full text]