Broken Homes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Broken Homes For Mentally Ill, Death and Misery By CLIFFORD J. LEVY Published: April 28, 2002 Randolph Maddix, a schizophrenic who lived at a private home for the mentally ill in Brooklyn, was often left alone to suffer seizures, his body crumpling to the floor of his squalid room. The home, Seaport Manor, is responsible for 325 starkly ill people, yet many of its workers could barely qualify for fast-food jobs. So it was no surprise that Mr. Maddix, 51, was dead for more than 12 hours before an aide finally checked on him. His back, curled and stiff with rigor mortis, had to be broken to fit him into a body bag. At Anna Erika, a similar adult home in Staten Island entrusted by the state to care for the mentally ill, three other residents had previously jumped to their deaths when a distraught Lisa Valante, 37, sought help. But it was after 5 p.m. and, as usual, the residents, some so sick they cannot tie their shoes, were expected to fend for themselves. No one stopped Ms. Valante, then, from flinging herself out a seventh-floor window. Sometimes at these homes, the greatest threat can be the person who sleeps in the next bed. Despite a history of violent behavior, Erik Chapman was accepted at Park Manor in Brooklyn. After four years of roaming the place with a knife, Mr. Chapman stabbed his roommate, Gregory Ridges, more than 20 times. At last, Mr. Chapman was sent to a secure psychiatric facility. Mr. Ridges was sent to Cypress Hills Cemetery at the age of 35. Every day, New Yorkers come face to face with the mentally ill who have ended up on the streets since the state began closing its disgraced psychiatric wards more than a generation ago. Mr. Maddix, Ms. Valante and Mr. Ridges were among thousands more who ended up in dozens of privately run and state-regulated adult homes in New York City. A yearlong reporting effort by The New York Times, drawing upon more than 5,000 pages of annual state inspection reports, 200 interviews with workers, residents and family members, and three dozen visits to the homes show that many of them have devolved into places of misery and neglect, just like the psychiatric institutions before them. But if The Times's investigation found that the state's own files over the years have chronicled a stunning array of disorder and abuse at many of the homes, it discovered that the state has not kept track of what could be the greatest indicator of how broken the homes are: how many residents are dying, under what circumstances and at what ages. The Times's investigation has produced the first full accounting of deaths of adult home residents. At 26 of the largest and most troubled homes in the city, which collectively shelter some 5,000 mentally ill people, The Times documented 946 deaths from 1995 through 2001. Of those, 326 were of people under 60, including 126 in their 20's, 30's and 40's. At two of the largest homes, Leben Home in Queens and Seaport Manor in Brooklyn, roughly a quarter of the 145 residents who died were under 50. The Times's analysis of the deaths used Social Security, state, court and coroner's records, as well as psychiatric and medical files. The analysis shows that some residents died roasting in their rooms during heat waves. Others threw themselves from rooftops, making up some of at least 14 suicides in that seven-year period. Still more, lacking the most basic care, succumbed to routinely treatable ailments, from burst appendixes to seizures. Some of the hundreds of deaths undoubtedly stemmed from natural causes and were unavoidable. Studies have found that the mentally ill typically have shorter life expectancies than the general population, because they have difficulty caring for themselves and are more prone to health problems. The average age of death in the overall survey was 63. There are few extensive studies on death rates of the mentally ill in facilities like adult homes. But Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, a psychiatrist who is a nationally recognized expert on mental illness and mortality, called The Times's analysis disturbing. ''It would certainly suggest a fair number of deaths that were premature,'' said Dr. Torrey, who is executive director of the Stanley Medical Research Institute in Bethesda, Md., and is familiar with the adult home system in New York City. ''There is no question that if these people were getting better care and more skilled care, they would be living longer. And this poor care leading to death is going to cut right across the age population. It also means that people who are 70 are dying prematurely.'' In the end, whether the residents were in their 20's or 70's, it is impossible to know just how many of their deaths could have been prevented. The only other accounting of the dead seems to be on Hart Island in the East River, where scores of adult home residents are buried in the mass graves of potter's field. Officials at the State Department of Health, which regulates the homes, acknowledge that they have never enforced a 1994 law that requires the homes to report all deaths to the state. Asked for records of any investigations into deaths at the homes, the department produced files on only 3 of the nearly 1,000 deaths. None of the suicides were among the three. Even the fatal stabbing of Mr. Ridges at Park Manor went unexamined by the department. The city medical examiner's office said it had not received a single inquiry in recent memory from state inspectors regarding an autopsy of an adult home resident. Neither Gov. George E. Pataki nor his health commissioner, Dr. Antonia C. Novello, would comment on The Times's investigation. Their aides said a deputy health commissioner would speak for the administration. Presented with The Times's findings, the deputy health commissioner, Robert R. Hinckley, said the department would examine ''ways to better investigate those deaths that are reported to us.'' To that end, Mr. Hinckley said the state would issue a regulation alerting the homes that it would strictly enforce the 1994 law on reporting deaths. ''We want facilities to follow the law, and we are redoubling our efforts to get them to report all deaths,'' he said. As of Friday, seven weeks after Mr. Hinckley's promise, the department had still not issued the regulation. About 15,000 mentally ill adults -- most of them poor, many of them black and Hispanic -- reside in more than 100 adult homes in the state, the majority in the city and its suburbs. Some are now larger than most psychiatric hospitals in the nation. The reality of the homes is far from what was envisioned. In the 1960's, New York, like other states, decided to shutter or sharply scale back its psychiatric wards, where patients often languished for decades. When the profit-making adult homes offered to shelter the discharged patients, the state embraced the idea. Federal disability money was used to pay the homes, which would provide meals, activities and supervision. The homes would bring in outside providers for psychiatric and medical care. The state was responsible for making sure it all went well. But from the start, problems surfaced. No one knew about them better than the state itself, which for 30 years has issued damning inspection reports and then all but ignored them. State investigators across those three decades described many of the homes as little more than psychiatric flophouses, with negligent supervision and incompetent distribution of crucial medication. At one, Brooklyn Manor, the staffing was so sparse that a resident was put in charge of the entire place on one evening, a routine 2001 state inspection report shows. In more than 100 inspection reports from 1995 through 2001, investigators frequently noted filthy and vermin-ridden rooms in some homes, and disheveled and unbathed residents in others. They cited administrators for poor, sometimes fraudulent, record-keeping involving residents' money and care. A 2001 state inspection of Garden of Eden in Brooklyn found the operator to be ''routinely threatening residents.'' In a 1990 overview of adult homes, the Commission on Quality of Care for the Mentally Disabled, a small state watchdog agency, rated half of the homes that it surveyed in the city as poor. Ten years later, the agency came to the same conclusion. But the formal reports get at only part of the system's failures, according to The Times's investigation. The investigation reveals several of the homes to be medical mills where the operators and health care providers pressure residents to undergo treatment -- even surgical operations -- they neither need nor understand in order to earn Medicaid and Medicare billings. The homes are typically run by businessmen with no mental-health training. A 1999 audit by the State Comptroller's Office aimed at evaluating the regulation of adult homes found that the Department of Health had done little to scrutinize the people it licensed to run them. The homes are staffed largely by $6-an-hour workers who dispense thousands of pills of complex psychotropic drugs each day. At one home, Ocean House in Queens, social workers said a medication worker was basically illiterate. The homes are not required to have professional staff on duty overnight. Multiple visits reveal that often only the janitors, and possibly a guard or two, remain. Nathaniel Miles, a former porter at Surf Manor, a 200-bed home in Coney Island, recounted two scenes last year that he called typical: on one night, he had to stanch the heavy bleeding of a resident who had had a seizure and fallen in a bathtub.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Bound by Oath | Season 2 | Episode 5: Under Color of Law John​: In
    1 Bound By Oath | Season 2 | Episode 5: Under Color of Law John:​ In 1958, at 5:45 in the morning, Chicago police burst into the home of James and Flossie Monroe and dragged them out of bed at gunpoint. And they scared the hell out James and Flossie’s six children. Houston Stevens:​ The children we made a lot of noise. We screamed. We did a lot of yelling to alert all the neighbors. Cause we didn't know who these were. It was 14 white guys armed with pistols drawn. Jacqui Abrams:​ They pulled out a picture and showed me a picture. “Is this James Monroe?” Of course it is! Yes, that's him, but who are you? Ralph Stevens:​ All I can say is that I tried to block it out like a nightmare because it felt like, and I lived that way for many, many years growing up, like it was a nightmare. It was denial -- my way to suppress and deny how traumatic it was. John:​ James Monroe had not committed the crime he’d been accused of, and the police did not have a warrant to search his home or arrest him. So the family sued, seeking damages from the officers. But rather than suing in state court, James and Flossie did something that Congress had said they could do way back in 1871. They filed suit against the officers in federal court under Section One of the Ku Klux Klan Act. Today Section One is known as Section 1983. And it’s one of the most important and most frequently litigated civil rights laws on the books.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of the February 6, 2021 Police-Involved Shooting in Gaithersburg, Maryland
    In the matter of the February 6, 2021 police-involved shooting in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Pursuant to an agreement between our two offices, the Office of the State’s Attorney for Howard County is hereby providing this written memorandum detailing our investigation and the conclusions we reached regarding a police-involved shooting that occurred on February 6, 2021 in the 6000 block of Olney Laytonsville Road in Gaithersburg. Timeline of Investigation On the morning of Saturday, February 6, 2021, Howard County State’s Attorney Office received an email from Detective Eric Glass of the Montgomery County Police Department – Homicide Section. DSA Sandmann called Detective Glass on the phone and was informed by Glass that Montgomery County had a police-involved shooting in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Glass indicated that an off-duty sheriff deputy had shot and killed a person who had been running cars off the road with his vehicle. Upon locating the suspect, the deputy approached him. Glass indicated the suspect attacked the deputy with a bat or stick of some sort before being shot. The initial information revealed that several 911 calls came in at just after 8 a.m. The callers told the 911 dispatcher that a multiple vehicle accident (airbags deployed) had just occurred in the 6000 block of Olney Laytonsville Road in Gaithersburg. Police and paramedics were immediately dispatched to the scene. The callers went on to say a person driving a Volkswagen had caused one vehicle to swerve off the road into a pole before continuing on and hitting a second vehicle in a head-on collision.
    [Show full text]
  • 67Th Legislature HR 4.1
    67th Legislature HR 4.1 1 HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 4 2 INTRODUCED BY A. OLSEN 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF MONTANA TO LIMIT THE 5 PRODUCTION AND FIRST USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS. 6 7 WHEREAS, the use of even a small number of nuclear weapons could have catastrophic human, 8 environmental, health, and economic consequences globally; and 9 WHEREAS, the United States is currently planning to spend nearly $2 trillion over the next 30 years 10 rebuilding its entire nuclear weapons arsenal, which is a gross misuse of funds that could be devoted instead to 11 improving security, health, and education; and 12 WHEREAS, Montana is home to Malmstrom Air Force Base, the common center for L50 Minuteman III 13 intercontinental nuclear missiles located throughout north central Montana; and 14 WHEREAS, Montanans have a special responsibility to advocate for no first use because the 15 intercontinental nuclear missiles buried in their prairie give them a heightened awareness of the reality and 16 threat of nuclear armaments; and 17 WHEREAS, the United States currently reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to 18 nonnuclear attacks by Russia, China, or North Korea, which could respond by using their own nuclear 19 weapons, resulting in a nuclear war that could have devastating consequences; and 20 WHEREAS, the sole purpose of United States nuclear weapons should be to deter a nuclear attack on 21 the United States, its forces, and its allies, so that there is no reason for the United States to ever use nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • English II RELEASED
    STAAR® State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness English II Administered April 2019 RELEASED Copyright © 2019, Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. Reproduction of all or portions of this work is prohibited without express written permission from the Texas Education Agency. STAAR English II 09/17/2019 EN2SP19R_rev00 STAAR English II 09/17/2019 EN2SP19R_rev00 REVISING English II Page 3 STAAR English II 09/17/2019 EN2SP19R_rev00 Read the selection and choose the best answer to each question. Then fill in the answer on your answer document. J.T. wrote this paper about a unique Japanese activity. Read the paper and look for any revisions J.T. should make. Then answer the questions that follow. In Sync (1) Texas is known for its superb high school marching bands. (2) Each week during football season, thousands of students take to the field to display their musical and marching talents. (3) These same students also compete in local, state, and national competitions and exhibitions. (4) However, marching bands aren’t found in just this state or even just this country. (5) But in one country there are marchers who skip the music component all together. (6) Students at Japan’s Nippon Sports Science University, NSSU, participate in an intricate marching-like exhibition known as precision walking. (7) NSSU students have perfected the nearly 50-year-old tradition of shuudan koudou, which means “collective action.” (8) The collective action is a carefully choreographed display of synchronized walking. (9) Identically dressed students walk forward and backward to form lines and shapes, even crossing between one another at times.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying the Line Flying the Line the First Half Century of the Air Line Pilots Association
    Flying the Line Flying the Line The First Half Century of the Air Line Pilots Association By George E. Hopkins The Air Line Pilots Association Washington, DC International Standard Book Number: 0-9609708-1-9 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 82-073051 © 1982 by The Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l., Washington, DC 20036 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First Printing 1982 Second Printing 1986 Third Printing 1991 Fourth Printing 1996 Fifth Printing 2000 Sixth Printing 2007 Seventh Printing 2010 CONTENTS Chapter 1: What’s a Pilot Worth? ............................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Stepping on Toes ...................................................................... 9 Chapter 3: Pilot Pushing .......................................................................... 17 Chapter 4: The Airmail Pilots’ Strike of 1919 ........................................... 23 Chapter 5: The Livermore Affair .............................................................. 30 Chapter 6: The Trouble with E. L. Cord .................................................. 42 Chapter 7: The Perils of Washington ........................................................ 53 Chapter 8: Flying for a Rogue Airline ....................................................... 67 Chapter 9: The Rise and Fall of the TWA Pilots Association .................... 78 Chapter 10: Dave Behncke—An American Success Story ......................... 92 Chapter 11: Wartime.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Airspace Violations and Pilot Report Data
    NASA/CR—2005-213923 Violations of Temporary Flight Restrictions and Air Defense Identification Zones: An Analysis of Airspace Violations and Pilot Report Data Michael Zuschlag John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts September 2005 The NASA STI Program Office ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA Scientific and Technical technical conferences, symposia, Information (STI) Program Office plays a key seminars, or other meetings sponsored or part in helping NASA maintain this important co-sponsored by NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by technical, or historical information from Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA programs, projects, and missions, NASA’s scientific and technical information. The often concerned with subjects having NASA STI Program Office provides access to the substantial public interest. NASA STI Database, the largest collection of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- The Program Office is also NASA’s institutional language translations of foreign scientific mechanism for disseminating the results of its and technical material pertinent to research and development activities. These results NASA’s mission. are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services that complement the STI Program Office’s diverse offerings include • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of creating custom thesauri, building customized completed research or a major significant databases, organizing and publishing research phase of research that present the results of results ... even providing videos.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange-Traded Funds
    Conformed to Federal Register version SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR Parts 210, 232, 239, 270, and 274 [Release Nos. 33-10695; IC-33646; File No. S7-15-18] RIN 3235-AJ60 Exchange-Traded Funds AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) is adopting a new rule under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act” or the “Act”) that will permit exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) that satisfy certain conditions to operate without the expense and delay of obtaining an exemptive order. In connection with the final rule, the Commission will rescind certain exemptive relief that has been granted to ETFs and their sponsors. The Commission also is adopting certain disclosure amendments to Form N-1A and Form N-8B-2 to provide investors who purchase and sell ETF shares on the secondary market with additional information regarding ETF trading and associated costs, regardless of whether such ETFs are structured as registered open-end management investment companies (“open-end funds”) or unit investment trusts (“UITs”). Finally, the Commission is adopting related amendments to Form N-CEN. The final rule and form amendments are designed to create a consistent, transparent, and efficient regulatory framework for ETFs that are organized as open- end funds and to facilitate greater competition and innovation among ETFs. The Commission also is adopting technical amendments to Form N-CSR, Form N-1A, Form N-8B-2, Form N-PORT, and Regulation S-X. DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective December 23, 2019. Compliance Dates: The applicable compliance dates are discussed in section II.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Dov Charney's American Dream Audio Part 3: Photos Https
    Dov Charney’s American Dream Audio Part 3: Photos https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-3-photos-season-4-episode-6/ Part 4: Boundaries https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-4-boundaries-season-4-episode-7/ Part 5: Suits https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-5-suits-season-4-episode-8/ Part 6: Anger https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-6-anger-season-4-episode-9/ Part 7: MAGIC https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-7-magic-season-4-episode-10/ Host: Lisa Chow ​ Senior Producer: Kaitlin Roberts ​ Producers: Bruce Wallace, Luke Malone, Molly Messick ​ Associate Producer: Simone Polanen ​ Editors: Alex Blumberg, Alexandra Johnes, Caitlin Kenney ​ Audio Engineers: Andrew Dunn, David Herman, Martin Peralta, Dara Hersch ​ 2 Episode Transcripts Part 3: Photos DOV: Look how cool that is, that metro thing. C’mon that is cool. Isn’t it? LISA: Oh yeah! There’s a metro stop right on a highway? DOV: Yeah, this is LA, dude. Get with the program. LISA: Hello. From Gimlet Media, this is StartUp. I'm Lisa Chow. And once again, I’m sitting in the car with the ex-CEO of American Apparel Dov Charney. And just a quick warning, there’s some swearing in this episode … and some sexual content. DOV: This is an interesting mural that I’m going to shoot now since we’re in traffic. That’s a good one. LISA: Dov’s taking photographs while driving. This happens all the time. Something catches his eye — a mural or an old sign or a storefront — and he has to get the shot. So he rolls down the window, grabs his phone, and stretches out both hands…and totally forgets about the steering wheel.
    [Show full text]
  • Holding On: Fighting to Preserve Essential Services at a Community Hospital the Goal of This Manual
    Holding On: Fighting to Preserve Essential Services at a Community Hospital A manual for advocates by advocates, based on the closure of Waltham Hospital in Waltham, Massachusetts By Alex Sugerman-Brozan and Laurie Martinelli, Health Law Advocates, October 2003 Many thanks to Tony Mangini, Dianne Koch, Kelly Cooper, Regina Rockefeller, Ruth Gately, Bob Marra and all the members of the Coalition to Save Waltham Hospital. Special thanks to Dawn Touzin for her excellent editing assistance. This manual was made possible by the support of Community Catalyst and by a grant from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Community Catalyst (www.communitycatalyst.org) is a nonprofit, national health care advocacy organization dedicated to building consumer and community participation in the decisions that shape the health system to ensure quality, affordable health care for all. It is working with consumer advocates around the country to expand health care access, improve health care quality, preserve health care resources amid hospital and health plan restructuring, strengthen the capacity of consumer health advocacy groups, and build state and regional networks to work for needed policy and system change. One of Community Catalyst’s key initiatives is the Community Health Assets Project (CHAP), which is carried out in conjunction with the West Coast Regional Office of Consumers Union. CHAP seeks to protect nonprofit charitable health assets and community-based health services when nonprofit health care institutions seek to become for-profit or otherwise restructure. CHAP coaches consumer groups intervening in these and other kinds of transactions, such as hospital closings, health plan mergers, and HMO bankruptcies. CHAP also works with these groups to ensure that the new foundations resulting from such conversions are set up to be responsive to the health needs of their communities and provide for public participation in foundation decision- making.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisher House Foundation Community Outreach Guide
    Community Outreach Guide July 2020 Fisher House Foundation Community Outreach Guide Index Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 2 Forming the Board ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Who You Should Contact .......................................................................................................................... 4 Fundraising at Fisher House ......................................................................................................................... 5 Use of Fisher House Logo ........................................................................................................................ 6 Fundraising Events ................................................................................................................................... 6 Online Giving and Sustainers.................................................................................................................... 8 Recognition and Donor Privacy ................................................................................................................ 8 Permanent Donor Recognition .................................................................................................................. 8 Planned Giving .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Activities As Harvesting, Packing, Holding, Or Manufacturing/Processing for Farms and Facilities: Guidance for Industry
    Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Draft-Not for Implementation Classification of Activities as Harvesting, Packing, Holding, or Manufacturing/Processing for Farms and Facilities: Guidance for Industry Draft Guidance This guidance is being distributed for comment purposes only. Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that FDA considers your comment on this draft guidance before we begin work on the final version of the guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft guidance within 180 days of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number FDA-2016-D-2373 listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. For questions regarding this draft document contact the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) at 240-402-1700. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition August 2016 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Draft-Not for Implementation Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Background on Farm-Related Definitions A. Rulemaking to Revise Farm-Related Definitions B. Definitions of “Farm” and “Mixed-Type Facility” C. Definitions of “Harvesting,” “Packing,” “Packaging,” “Holding,” and “Manufacturing/Processing” D. Manufacturing/Processing Activities That Are Allowed Within the Farm Definition E. “Packing,” “Packaging,” and Stickering/Labeling Activities That Are Allowed Within the “Farm” Definition F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pilot in Command and the Fars: the Buck Stops Here (Almost Always)1 Raymond C
    A Publication of The Florida Bar Aviation Law Committee To Promote Education in the Florida Aviation Community Volume I, Issue 3 Florida Aviation Law Journal August 2008 The Pilot in Command and the FARs: The Buck Stops Here (Almost Always)1 Raymond C. Speciale2 and Brett D. Venhuizen3 The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) command for the flight. For Part 135 flights, make it clear—the pilot in command of an the 135 certificate holder must designate IN THIS ISSUE: aircraft is directly responsible for, and acts a pilot in command and “a second in com- as the final authority as to, the operation of mand”8 for flights that require two pilots.9 Read Back ................................2 that aircraft.4 However, the regulations are Once designated, the pilot in command of a FAA Proposal on often silent on several significant questions Part 135 flight remains the pilot in command Registration of Aircraft ....4 that frequently arise in the context of pilot in at all times during that flight.10 For Part 121 command responsibility. First, who is the flights, the minimum pilot crew is two pilots Airport “Through the Fence” operations and pilot in command when more than one pilot and the Part 121 certificate holder must Residential Airparks occupies the cockpit? Also, is the pilot in designate one pilot as pilot in command and at Publicly Funded command responsible when a qualified and the other pilot as second in command.11 Airports ................................5 capable second in command commits an er- For operations under Part 9112 of the ror? Is the pilot in command responsible for FARs, the question of who is pilot in com- knowing whether his aircraft is being oper- mand can be simple in some cases and ated with any latent defects that might impact more complex in others.
    [Show full text]