Thursday, December 8, 2005 Expansion to Non
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Table Game Progressives
TABLE GAME PROGRESSIVES JACK Cleveland is excited to offer Table Games Progressive Wagers. These progressives can be found at our Blackjack, Pai Gow, Three Card Poker, Four Card Poker, Ultimate Texas Hold’em, Let It Ride and Mississippi Stud tables. See below for additional information regarding these progressives: Blazing 7’s Progressive (Blackjack) The Blazing 7’s Progressive is an optional $5 side bet for blackjack. Players must make a standard blackjack bet in order to make a Blazing 7’s progressive bet. This bet considers both the player’s initial two cards and the dealer’s up card. If the player does not have at least one 7 in the player’s initial two cards, the progressive bet will lose. If the player’s initial two cards contain at least one 7, the player’s Blazing 7’s Progressive side wager is paid according to the following payable: Hand Payouts Three 7's – Same Suit 100% Three 7's – Same Color 10% Three 7's $1,000.00 First 2 Cards (Player’s) – Two 7's $125.00 First 2 Cards (Player’s) – One 7 $10.00 *Original Wager is NOT Returned *Note: The Two 7’s payout is based only upon the player’s first two cards. Fortune Pai Gow Progressive The Fortune Pai Gow Progressive is an optional $1 side bet for Pai Gow Poker. Players must make a standard Pai Gow bet in order to make a Fortune Pai Gow Progressive bet. The bet considers the best hand possible among all the player’s cards. If the player has a hand that contains a qualifying winning Fortune Pai Gow Progressive wager, the wager will be paid according to the following payable: Hand Payouts 7 Card Straight Flush 100% 5 Aces 10% Royal Flush $500.00 Straight Flush $100.00 Four of a Kind $75.00 Full House $4.00 *Original Wager is NOT Returned *Note: The Joker is used to complete a Straight, Flush and Straight Flush; Otherwise the Joker substitutes for an Ace. -
Problem Gambling: How Japan Could Actually Become the Next Las Vegas
[Type here] PROBLEM GAMBLING: HOW JAPAN COULD ACTUALLY BECOME THE NEXT LAS VEGAS Jennifer Roberts and Ted Johnson INTRODUCTION Although with each passing day it appears less likely that integrated resorts with legalized gaming will become part of the Tokyo landscape in time for the city’s hosting of the summer Olympics in 20201, there is still substantial international interest in whether Japan will implement a regulatory system to oversee casino-style gaming. In 2001, Macau opened its doors for outside companies to conduct casino gaming operations as part of its modernized gaming regulatory system.2 At that time, it was believed that Macau would become the next Las Vegas.3 Just a few years after the new resorts opened, many operated by Las Vegas casino company powerhouses, Macau surpassed Las Vegas as the “gambling center” at one point.4 With tighter restrictions and crackdowns on corruption, Macau has since experienced declines in gaming revenue.5 When other countries across Asia have either contemplated or adopted gaming regulatory systems, it is often believed that they could become the 1 See 2020 Host City Election, OLYMPIC.ORG, http://www.olympic.org/2020-host- city-election (last visited Oct. 25, 2015). 2 Macau Gaming Summary, UNLV CTR. FOR GAMING RES., http://gaming. unlv.edu/ abstract/macau.html (last visited Oct. 25, 2015). 3 David Lung, Introduction: The Future of Macao’s Past, in THE CONSERVATION OF URBAN HERITAGE: MACAO VISION – INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE xiii, xiii (The Cultural Inst. of the Macao S. A. R. Gov’t: Studies, Research & Publ’ns Div. 2002), http://www.macauheritage.net/en/knowledge/vision/vision_xxi.pdf (noting, in 2002, of outside investment as possibly creating a “Las Vegas of the East”). -
Hedging Your Bets: Is Fantasy Sports Betting Insurance Really ‘Insurance’?
HEDGING YOUR BETS: IS FANTASY SPORTS BETTING INSURANCE REALLY ‘INSURANCE’? Haley A. Hinton* I. INTRODUCTION Sports betting is an animal of both the past and the future: it goes through the ebbs and flows of federal and state regulations and provides both positive and negative repercussions to society. While opponents note the adverse effects of sports betting on the integrity of professional and collegiate sporting events and gambling habits, proponents point to massive public interest, the benefits to state economies, and the embracement among many professional sports leagues. Fantasy sports gaming has engaged people from all walks of life and created its own culture and industry by allowing participants to manage their own fictional professional teams from home. Sports betting insurance—particularly fantasy sports insurance which protects participants in the event of a fantasy athlete’s injury—has prompted a new question in insurance law: is fantasy sports insurance really “insurance?” This question is especially prevalent in Connecticut—a state that has contemplated legalizing sports betting and recognizes the carve out for legalized fantasy sports games. Because fantasy sports insurance—such as the coverage underwritten by Fantasy Player Protect and Rotosurance—satisfy the elements of insurance, fantasy sports insurance must be regulated accordingly. In addition, the Connecticut legislature must take an active role in considering what it means for fantasy participants to “hedge their bets:” carefully balancing public policy with potential economic benefits. * B.A. Political Science and Law, Science, and Technology in the Accelerated Program in Law, University of Connecticut (CT) (2019). J.D. Candidate, May 2021, University of Connecticut School of Law; Editor-in-Chief, Volume 27, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal. -
2021 Canterbury Park Media Guide Is Now Online
2021 MEDIA GUIDE 65 Race Dates May 18th - September 16th 2021 Media Guide by Jeff Maday/Ted Pawlicki Photos by Coady Photography WELCOME TO CANTERBURY PARK Media Information The Dark Star Press Box Phones: For your convenience, phones are available on the press box work desk. Dial 9 for an outside line. Welcome to Canterbury Park. Our press box staff is here to assist you. Wireless Internet Access: Canterbury’s wireless is available for your use by connecting to the wireless network (Please ask staff Jeff Maday for details). This media guide can also be found in pdf format Media Relations Manager on the media relations portion of our website found at www. canterburypark.com. [email protected] Media Credentials: Credentials will be issued by the Media Follow Canterbury Park on Twitter: Relations Manager. Canterbury Press Box: @CBYTrackFlack Canterbury Park: @CanterburyPark Jockeys’ Room: No access to Jockey’s room during the 2021 Live Race season. Press Box Phone: 952.496.6408 Photography/Video: Photographers must have credentials. Safety of the photographers, jockeys, and horses is a priority. Please see the Press Box Staff for details on accessible areas and to obtain a credential. Under certain circumstances, permission from state racing officials is required. Photography on the racetrack and in the infield must be cleared in advance for safety reasons. LIVE RACING CALENDAR CANTERBURY PARK INFORMATION Canterbury Park Contact Information Card Casino Our 20,000 square-foot card casino features 73 gaming tables with comfortable Mailing Address 1100 Canterbury Road seating, full bar, menu with table service, check cashing service and Chips Bar. -
Combatting Problem Gambling and Its Harms in Japan Ahead of the Legalization of Casinos
VALDEZ FORMATTED.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/30/17 2:23 PM EX ANTE UP: COMBATTING PROBLEM GAMBLING AND ITS HARMS IN JAPAN AHEAD OF THE LEGALIZATION OF CASINOS Verin W. Valdez* INTRODUCTION Modern nations across the globe—including the United States, Australia, China, and Singapore—permit casino gambling in some form, but in Japan gambling remains a crime under Chapter XXIII of Penal Code Act No. 45 of 1907.1 Specifically, Chapter XXIII punishes any person engaged in the following acts: gambling, habitual gambling, and operating a place for gambling, or organizing a group of habitual gamblers for profit.2 This provision implicitly outlaws any casino or other type of gambling hall.3 Chapter XXIII also penalizes any person involved in the sale, delivery, or receipt of lottery tickets; however, betting on horse racing, bicycles, and speedboats is legal.4 In April 2010, Japanese lawmakers began promoting legislation that would permit the establishment of casinos in Japan.5 Lawmakers primarily sought to boost the economy in Japan, which had been waning and continues to stagnate.6 * © 2016 Verin W. Valdez. J.D. 2016, University of San Diego School of Law. The author would like to thank Kelsey Quigley and Bradley Harris for their guidance. 1 See KEIHŌ [KEIHŌ] [PEN. C.] 1907, art. 185–87 (Japan); see also Kenji Saito & Norika Yuasa, Gaming Law: Consideration of Japanese Gaming Law, IFLR.COM (Apr. 1, 2012), http://www.iflr.com/Article/3007248/ Gaming-law-Consideration- of-Japanese-Gaming-Law.html. 2 See KEIHŌ [KEIHŌ] [PEN. C.] 1907, art. 185–86 (Japan). 3 See id. -
THREE CARD POKER Before the First Card Is Dealt, Each Player Must Place an Ante Wager And/ Or a Pair Plus Wager
THREE CARD POKER Before the first card is dealt, each player must place an ante wager and/ or a pair plus wager. The ante wager is a wager against the dealer. The pair plus wager is a wager against a posted scale of payouts. All ante and pair plus wagers must be placed prior to the dealer announcing “no more bets.” Each player and the dealer receive three cards face down. Players then look at their cards and decide whether to fold (forfeit their ante wager), or continue playing by placing a play wager which must be equal in amount to the ante wager. The dealer must qualify with a queen high or better. If the dealer does not have at least a queen high, the ante wager wins 1 to 1 and the play wager is returned. If the dealer qualifies with queen high or better, and if the player’s hand beats the dealer’s hand, the play wager wins 1 to 1 and the ante wager pays 1 to 1. In the event of a tie the hand is declared a push and all wagers are returned. ANTE BONUS Straight • 1 to 1 Three of a Kind • 4 to 1 Straight Flush • 5 to 1 PAIR PLUS PAYOUTS The Pair Plus Wager allows you to wager on the ranked value of your hand as it is dealt. The wager is not in competition with the dealer’s hand. The payouts for the Pair Plus Wager are as follows: Pair • 1 to 1 Flush • 3 to 1 Straight • 6 to 1 Three of a Kind • 30 to 1 Straight Flush • 40 to 1 An incorrect number of cards dealt to either the player or the dealer constitues a misdeal. -
A Friend Or Foe in the New Era of Sports and Gaming Competition?
Wednesday, December 5, 2018 Sports Betting: A Friend or Foe in the New Era of Sports and Gaming Competition? Moderator: Scott Finley: CEO and Managing Director of Scott Finley International Racing Speakers: Scott J. Daruty: Executive Vice President Content & Media, The Stronach Group Bill Knauf: Vice President Business Operations, Monmouth Park Racetrack Dean McKenzie: Director, New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing Inc Sam Swanell: CEO, PointsBet Ms. Wendy Davis: Good. Let's continue on this theme. Let everybody get their coffee and come on back in. Basically, the second section, second session of our sports wagering panels this morning, "Friend or Foe in the New Era of Sports and Gaming Competition". First of all, I'd like to thank our session sponsor, which is Daily Racing Form and the Stronach Group for our beverage break. Leading the discussion for this panel is Scott Finley. He's CEO and managing director of Scott Finley International Racing. His background is in business development, marketing, technology deployment in the horse racing and betting industries. He's owned and managed his own international racing and betting consulting practice since 2002. This certainly makes him uniquely qualified to lead this discussion. I know they've spent a lot of time getting all these comments put together in a logical format here. I just mentioned to Dean he had requested that we have his PowerPoints available for you. If you would like to take them, I will have — there will be copies of those PowerPoints in the back of the room if you'd like to get those on your way out. -
Report of the Gambling Commission 2006/07 HC
Annual Report and Accounts 2006|07 The Gambling Commission 1 Report of the Gambling Commission 2006/07 Presented pursuant to the Gambling Act 2005 paragraph 16 of Schedule 4 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 July 2007 HC 680 LONDON: THE STATIONERY OFFICE £18.00 SE/2005/113 (2004/05) The Gambling Commission regulates gambling in the public interest. It does so by keeping crime out of gambling, by ensuring that gambling is conducted fairly and openly, and by protecting children and vulnerable people from being harmed or exploited by gambling. The Commission also provides independent advice to government on gambling in Great Britain. Commissioners 2006/07: Peter Dean CBE Chairman Ben Gunn CBE QPM Bill Knight Rachel Lampard Andrew McIntosh Gill Milburn JP Roy Penrose OBE QPM Eve Salomon Michael Steen OBE Jenny Williams (Chief Executive) Gambling Commission Victoria Square House Victoria Square Birmingham B2 4BP Tel: 0121 230 6500 (switchboard) Tel: 0121 230 6666 (enquiries) Fax: 0121 233 6720 www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk Photography by Bill Knight www.knightsight.co.uk © Crown Copyright 2007 The text in this document (excluding any Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any queries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected]. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,348,749 B1 Ungaro Et Al
US008348749B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,348,749 B1 Ungaro et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 8, 2013 (54) MULTIPLE PROGRESSIVE GAMING TABLE 7,677.565 B2 * 3/2010 Grauzer et al. ........... 273/149 R APPARATUS 7,822,641 B2 10, 2010 Abbott et al. ................... 705/25 7,896,741 B2 * 3/2011 Kuehling et al. ............... 463,29 2001/0004607 A1* 6/2001 Olsen .............................. 463,26 (76) Inventors: Mark Curran Ungaro, Las Vegas, NV 2004/0102243 A1* 5/2004 Olsen .............................. 463,25 (US); Christopher John Nichols, Las 2005.0062226 A1* 3, 2005 Schubert et al. 273/149 R Vegas, NV (US) 2005/0239542 A1* 10/2005 Olsen .............................. 463,27 s 2006/0281537 A1* 12/2006 Abbott et al. ................... 463,25 2007/011 1786 A1* 5/2007 Snow .............................. 463,27 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 2007/01 17604 A1* 5, 2007 Sw . 463/16 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2008/0248855 A1 * 10, 2008 Kamano ......................... 463,20 U.S.C. 154(b) by 962 days. * cited by examiner (21) Appl. No.: 11/800,075 Primary Examiner — Masud Ahmed (22) Filed: May 4, 2007 (57) ABSTRACT A device that incorporates a random number generator that is (51) Int. Cl. to industry standards and can be configured and used for card A63F 9/24 (2006.01) games or electronic slot devices adding extra bonus betting (52) U.S. Cl. ...................................... ... 463/25: 463/30 that is electronically set to accept a wager on any hand of (58) Field of Classification Search .............. 463/20 37, Poker, Blackjack, Pontoon, Craps, Roulette, Baccarat, Mini 463/40–43; 273/292, 138.1, 143 R Baccarat, Stud Poker, Pai Gow, Pai Gow Poker, Spanish 21, See application file for complete search history. -
Filed: New York County Clerk 11/17/2015 10:18 Am Index No
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/17/2015 10:18 AM INDEX NO. 453054/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of New York, Index No. Plaintiffs, IAS Part________________ -against- Assigned to Justice________ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DraftKings, Inc., Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------X MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Preliminary Statement The New York State Constitution has prohibited bookmaking and other forms of sports gambling since 1894. Under New York law, a wager constitutes gambling when it depends on either a (1) “future contingent event not under [the bettor’s] control or influence” or (2) “contest of chance.” So-called Daily Fantasy Sports (“DFS”) wagers fit squarely in both these definitions, though by meeting just one of the two definitions DFS would be considered gambling. DFS is nothing more than a rebranding of sports betting. It is plainly illegal. The two dominant DFS operators, FanDuel and DraftKings, offer rapid-fire contests in which players can bet on the performance of a “lineup” of real athletes on a given day, weekend, or week. The contests are streamlined for instant-gratification, letting bettors risk up to $10,600 per wager and enter contests for a chance to win jackpots upwards of $1 million. The DFS operators themselves profit from every bet, taking a “rake” or a “vig” from all wagering on their sites. -
Daniel Wallach Good Afternoon, Chairman Verrengia
Statement to the Public Safety and Security Committee March 3, 2020 Witness: Daniel Wallach Good afternoon, Chairman Verrengia, Chairman Bradley and members of the Committee: Thank you for giving me an opportunity to testify today. My name is Daniel Wallach, and I am the founder of Wallach Legal LLC, a law firm focused primarily on sports wagering and gaming law. I am also the Co-Founding Director of the University of New Hampshire School of Law’s Sports Wagering and Integrity Program, the nation’s first law school certificate program dedicated to the legal and regulatory aspects of sport wagering. I am also a member of the International Masters of Gaming Law, an invitation-only organization for attorneys who have distinguished themselves through demonstrated performance and publishing in gaming law, significant gaming clientele and substantial participation in the gaming industry. I am here to address the following question: Is sports betting a “video facsimile or other commercial casino game”? This question takes on added importance in Connecticut because of various written agreements that the State has entered into with two Connecticut Tribes: the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe and Mohegan Tribe of Indians. One of these agreements is Memoranda of Understanding (MOU), which relates to the state-tribal gambling compact that each Tribe has entered into with the State. Under these compacts, the Tribes are required to pay the state a portion of their gross gaming revenues from the operation of video facsimile games on their reservations. But the MOUs provide that the Tribes are relieved of this obligation if Connecticut law is changed to permit “video facsimiles or other commercial casino games.” So, what would happen if the State of Connecticut were to pass a law authorizing sports wagering? Well, the Tribes would argue that sports wagering is a “commercial casino game,” thereby giving them the right under their MOUs to cease making payments to the State. -
An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests Under Conflicting State Law Regimes Laura A
Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 2 2008 No Contest? An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests under Conflicting State Law Regimes Laura A. D'Angelo Wyatt, aT rrant & Combs, LLP Daniel I. Waxman Wyatt, aT rrant & Combs, LLP Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl Part of the Gaming Law Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation D'Angelo, Laura A. and Waxman, Daniel I. (2008) "No Contest? An Analysis of the Legality of Thoroughbred Handicapping Contests under Conflicting State Law Regimes," Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kjeanrl/vol1/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. No CONTEST? AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGALITY OF THOROUGHBRED HANDICAPPING CONTESTS UNDER CONFLICTING STATE LAW REGIMES LAURA A. D'ANGELO* DANIEL I. WAXMAN** The traditional gaming market-share held by thoroughbred horse race wagering has significantly eroded over the past several years' due to the increased availability of mainstream gambling alternatives (i.e. land- based casinos and internet poker rooms).' The popularity and availability of alternative