Chapter V-VII the Ancient Lords of the Manor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter V-VII the Ancient Lords of the Manor HISTORICAL MIDDLETON . 45-• THE ANCIENT LORDS OF THE MANOR. .In Bainoti' " History of Lancashire," and in other accounts. only two incidents in the early 'history of Middleton are mentioned . FimUly, that in the early part of the reign of Henry III . Roger de Middleton and his son Alan (though elsewhere the canto author gives the date 1290 -to this transaction~, and, ,ccondly, it is noted that about the year 1322 the last Roger de \liddleton died, and his heiress, ~~acid or L1I• atildit, married Joint tie Burton. of Rydale, North York hire, and thus carried the estate= t•o that family . But there is no attempt at aug pedigree or history of these early families either in Baines or in any of the "Heralds' Visita- tions." and, in a search for matter to fill thief vacuity, many other members of these families anti their oumiectious, dating i nore than a cen- tury and a half further back than Baittes anti others have given account of, with some •.f their doings in those earlier days, have been brought to light . But before proceeding to complete this deficiency, in the course of which certain erroneous statements relating to the peronalties of these auccient lords -will receive incidental but important correction, it may be convenient to devote a little space to the names .by which they- were known, and which the, derived from their possessionm . The place-name Middleton itself may be rc- ferretl to Saxon times . The termination "tun" meant a settlement within an enclosure, and wa, the original form of the modern word- " town ." As to the derivation of the prefix "~fiddle," their have been various opinions . Some have regarded it as descriptive of the central position that the town occupies in the midst. of so many other towns with 'Saxon place-names . But this derivation has been doubted by others, who suggest that -tile name is more likely' to :have been derived from the hill on which the church stands, and that its original ' form was "Mid-hul-tun," the "ttin" adjacent to the "Mid-Hill ." This second idea of the origin of the name seems the most probable one . Many people know file hill on which the picturesque old church tower stands, overlooking tile high road ' -46 HISTORICAL MIDDLETON. into Yorkshire, which passes in front of he ancient inn, Old Boar's Head, and the original clearing may have been close by, or on the site of •the old manorial hall 'below . We may be sure that the " tun " would lie built as near to a copious .SUP]?] y of water as ".pcesible, and the river Irk, winch runs within two hundred yards of the hil .i . woul afford this necessary of rife and sanitation 'to the peopIe . -Other requirements, such as warmth and shelter with wood for fuel conveniently obtainable, aril immunity from the flooding of their rude - habitation,& in rainy seasons, these conditions would be most completely attained by fixing upon a site at the foot of the hill on which now stands the old church, and on that ,pot, we 'm'ay assume, . was founded the the Middleton of yore . Iii Watkin's "Roman Lancashire" is men- tioned a supposed Roman road leading in a - straight line from Manchester through Black- ley, Middleton, Castleton, and Rochdale to Ltttieborough, and from Middleton to Castk'- ton the present highway and the aforesaid Roman road run close together where not n identicail lines. Another route between Man- ol:ester and Littleborough is suggested and traced on 'the map which appears in Mr. Har- trison'd " Archmological Survey of Lancashire," on the authority of Whitaker, who considers this route to be sufficiently indicated by the place-narges "Street Fold ." "Street Bridge," and " Street Gate ." But to pass through these places necessitates a great bend to the eastward, a deviation which it is quite certain would never have been approved by the road makers who surmounted the elevation at Affet- side ' adjoining the north-west of Middleton parish, or Blackstone edge, on the. Yorkshire borders, rather than ease the gradient by taking a Sweep round its base, without good and obvious reasons, either strategic or topograp'm csi, and none such being conceivable, while the route pointed by Watkin is in close conformity with the usual practice of the Romans in roil snaking, the latter may be accepted as the true route. The would form a convenient halting- place 'RomanRomart troops on the march from Manchester, and Castleton and Littleborough . on to Ilklev, and the still more frequent move- ments eastward=, in the communications main- tained some three or four hundred years fo* the building and upkeep of the equipment of tha "Great Wall," to repair the waste arising from deaths, and to give occasional changes CE station to the troops fiv movements between the Roman capital at York and the military Strong- hold at Chester. Small communities of Brito- HISTORICAL MIDDLETON . 47 ,[Celts would doubtless he encouraged to gather at such halting-piaces, under the supervision of .their conquerors, for the accumulation of com- missariat stores, &c ., and for the services of tho ."inhabitants in the multifarious kinds of lwbour incident to a military halt . Such I take to :have been the inception of ancient Middleton, ..and the long period of the Roman occupation would afford ample time for development . Turning now from the "tun" to its ancient -lords . I would observe that in attempting to deal with the hietorv of any farnily in the .Salford Hundred, a few words on the original .Norman chief barons and their subfeudatories and the relations existing between the two .classes, may be considered appropriate . When the conquest of England had betas -completed William the Bastard, his favour- ites and military followers had their expecta- tions gratified b~• the greater part of the land being parcelled out amonnat them, while he , dispossessed Saxons were dealt with in various ways, according to their social condition . The lower classes, the working bees, were not seri- . ously disturbed ; they were required for future use ; but those who were possessed of property worth appropriating were driven from their homes, to perish, or to survive to a scarcely better fate, as good or evil fortune determined . though, as we shall see further on, many .,f .the Saxon underlords managed, by propitiating the intruders, or in other ways, to remain ui- disturbed in or be restored to their holdings . The inhabitants of this district, or indeed of this portion of the kingdom, had taken no part in the battle of Hastiii a. The two great. chiefs of Northumberland . Edwin and Mortar, after their defeat at Fulford by Harold Har . drada and Tostig, rendered little, if any . aid to Harold at Stamford Bridge, and held them . selves entirely aloof from him at Senlac, although he had on a very recent occasion sacri- ficed the interests, and thereby incurred the deep resentment, of his brother Tostig, in order to do them justice . He had also married their sister Aldwyth in the further endeavour to con- ciliate them and attach them to his fortunes . but to no purpose. They never moved to help Harold, or to hinder William . until long after the latter had been crowned in London. It would be after William's suppression of the third and last great northern rebellion ; after his atrocious harrying of Northumber land, " When men bowed their necks for bread in the evil days" (an euphemism for selling themselves into slavery) ; after his great march from York . via Leeds, over the hills, and prob- ably through Middleton and Manchester, amid 'the snows of February, 1070 . and onward to 48 HISTORICAL MIDDLETON . the capture of Chester ; after his wasting of" Cheshire and the ad,~'oining counties of Derby and Stafford ; and after his return to London on the successful accomplishment and comple- tion of hese acts of brutality. that he found . 'himself 'at leisure to effect the first settlement of the lands of Lancashire . Prior to this . "The lands of Eadwine and Markere and 'Waitheof and Copsige lay in regions to which . William's arms hail not. yett reached, and to which, if lie insisted on such an extreme stretch of severity (a:s confiscation) it might never reach ." And again . " No soldiers of William hal as vet, set foot in Northumberland or northern .Mercia." " The whole of northern England was simply left as it was before ; the old rulers, -the old proprietors. wero undis- turbed ; not a single castle had been built to keep Northumberland and northern Mercia in check." "It is not. necessary to suppose that every rood of ground was actually seized, and . either kept by the king, or granted out to his foreign followers . There is distinctt evidence tha6 the actual oceupiers of the soil, here as in other part .: of England, largely retained pos- session. Sonietimner4 . when a great estate was confiscated . the widow and children of the former owner obtained a grin: of -onto por tio:t of their heritage . In otlu •r cases the widow or daughter of the former owner was . constrained to give herself and her lands .to a foreign 'husband. In some cases Englishmen of high rank contrived to win William's per- sonal favour, and to koep their lands and even their offices. A crowd of smaller thegns anal of well-to-do cluirl . seem to have been left undisturbed ." As to the question whether Middleton WAS one of the places whose owners were left 'n .possession some light is thrown on this sub- : "Though . ject b y Mr. Harland, -a- ho says it is impossible to identify the localities or names of the twenty-one bercwicks mentioned in Domesdav as belonging, to the -hundred cf Salford in the time of King Edward the Con- fewer, then hold as Manors by as many Saxon thanes .
Recommended publications
  • Notes on Stanbury
    D R A F T NOTES ON THE LORDSHIP AND MANOR OF STANBURY Pre-History Evidence of Mesolithic settlement on upland sites in the NW of West Yorkshire along the major watersheds; evidence from Stanbury Moor in the form of three geometric microliths. 1 Bronze Age Stone circle discovered near the site of Walshaw Dean reservoir (SD 967343) on Wadsworth Moor to the SW of Stanbury Moor. The circle, 11 metres in diameter, surrounded a smaller circle, also built of stones. A second circle (SD 96213155) surveyed by the Ordnance Survey in 1962 thought to be a hut circle rather than a ceremonial circle. 2 Numerous additional National Monuments are also situated within the boundaries of the Manor of Stanbury. Anglo-Saxon Place-name: Old English Stan Burh “Stone Fortification”. Editor notes (1961) that “no trace of the fortification remains”. 3 “It is extremely difficult to isolate specific Mercian place-names. Even those containing definite Mercian forms, such as the inflected bury, rather than the uninflected borough from the OE burh (e.g. Stanbury, Dewsbury) may not go back to the 7th century, but may simply be the result of Mercian elements in the local dialect. Moreover, even if a place bears a probable Mercian name, this cannot be taken to indicate that it was actually occupied by Mercians.. It is, therefore, impossible at present to isolate specific Mercian settlements, but the possibility of their existence must be borne in mind in the course of future archaeological work in the county, especially in Agbrigg and Morley wapentakes, where the strongest evidence for Mercian influence is to be found in the place-names.” 4 Manor of Bradford held by Gamel.
    [Show full text]
  • Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire
    Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire Archaeological Building Investigation Oxford Archaeology North September 2008 Turner and Townsend and English Heritage Issue No: 2008-09/803 OAN Job No: L9899 NGR: SD 7424 4169 Planning Application 3/2006/1047 and 3/2007/0039 Document Title: Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire Document Type: Archaeological Building Investigation Client Name: Turner and Townsend and English Heritage Issue Number: 2008-09/803 OA Job Number: L9899 National Grid Reference: NGR SD 7424 4169 Prepared by: Karl Taylor Position: Project Officer Date: September 2008 Checked by: Jamie Quartermaine Signed……………………. Position: Senior Project Manager Date: September 2008 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: September 2008 Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd 2008 Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria House, 34 Wellgate, Clitheroe, Lancashire
    VICTORIA HOUSE, 34 WELLGATE, CLITHEROE, LANCASHIRE Archaeological Watching Brief Oxford Archaeology North September 2006 JYM Partnership Issue No: 2006-7/485 OAN Job No: L9653 NGR: SD 7450 4185 Planning Reference: 3/2005/0770 Document Title: VICTORIA HOUSE, 34 WELLGATE, CLITHEROE, LANCASHIRE Document Type: Archaeological Watching Brief Client Name: JYM Partnership Issue Number: 2006-7/485 OA Job Number: L9653 National Grid Reference: NGR SD 7450 4185 Prepared by: Steve Clarke Position: Assistant Supervisor Date: September 2006 Checked by: Alison Plummer Signed……………………. Position: Senior Project Manager Date: September 2006 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: September 2006 Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd 2006 Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Medieval Colonisation in the Forests of Howland, Knaresborough and Pickering
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF HOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Hull by MAURICE TURNER, B.Sc., B.A., OCTOBER, 1987 POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF BOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING Contents Preface Chapter I The material of the thesis and the methods of Page 1 investigation Chapter II The medieval background to encroachment Page 7 a) The utilisation of forest land b) The nature of medieval clearance c) Early clearances in the Forest of Pickering d) Medieval colonisation in Bowland Forest e) Migration into Knaresborough Forest after the Black Death f) The medieval settlement pattern in Knaresborough Forest g) Measures of forest land Chapter III Tenures, Rents and Taxes in the Tudor Forests Page 36 a) The evidence of the Tudor Lay Subsidies b) The evidence of manorial rent rolls C) Tudor encroachment on the common wastes Chapter IV The demographic experience of forest Page 53 parishes Chapter V The reasons for encroachment Page 73 a) The problem of poverty in 17th century England b) The evidence for subdivision of holdings c) Changes in the size of tenements with time d) Subdivided holdings in Forests other than Knaresborough Chapter VI Illegal encroachment in the Forest of Knaresborough Page 96 a) The creation of new hamlets 1600 - 1669 b) The slowing down of encroachment in the late 17th century c) The physical form of squatter encroachments as compared to copyholder intakes before 1730 Chapter VII Alternative
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Lancashire Manorial Records Final
    Lancashire Archives A Guide to Manorial Records Sarah Rose, Eleanor Straughton and Angus Winchester Lancashire Archives Lancaster University 2012 Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Text copyright © S. Rose, E. Straughton and A. Winchester LANCASTER U N I V E R S I T Y Lancashire Archives Lancashire Record Office Bow Lane Preston PR1 2RE 01772 533039 [email protected] www.archives.lancashire.gov.uk Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Contents Introduction 2 What are Manorial Records? 2 What is a Manor? 2 Manor courts 3 Subjects of Court Jurisdiction and Enquiry Manorial Tenants Manorial Rights Manorial Records 7 Interpreting the Record of a Manor Court 9 Locating Manorial Records 10 Manorial Documents Register Record Office Lists and Catalogues Major Collections of Lancashire Manorial Records Superior Lordships in Lancashire 11 Manorial Records for Local and Family History 13 Sources for Family History Sources for the History of the Community Sources for Property History Sources for the History of the Local Environment Further Reading 16 Glossary 19 Examples 24 1 Introduction This guide has been produced on behalf of Lancashire Archives as part of a collaborative project, run by The National Archives and Lancaster University, to digitise the Manorial Documents Register for Lancashire. The aim of this project is to raise awareness and encourage the use of manorial records. Parts of this guide have been reproduced from the Cumbrian Manorial Records website, which was created as part of the Cumbrian MDR project in 2006. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/manorialrecords/index.htm All the examples in this guide relate to the records of Lancashire manors held in collections at Lancashire Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • L.L.H.F. Newsletter 02
    local LANCASHIRE LOCAL HISTORY FEDERATION NEWSLETTER history ISSUE NO.2 federation SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2012 ancashire ====================================================================== Bob Dobson (Publicity Officer, Federation) sends this important reminder: *****Membership of this Federation is free until the end of 2013. Details from: Treasurer and Membership Secretary Mrs N.M.Hollings, 9 Park House,Gorseyfields,Droylsden,Manchester. M43 6DX : [email protected] ====================================================================== LLHF NEWSLETTER EDITOR: Mrs M. Edwards. Telephone: 0161 256 6585 email: [email protected] DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE: JANUARY 14TH, 2013. ======================================================================= Jointly organised by UCLAN Institute of Local & Family History and the Lancashire Local History Federation Saturday, 20th October, 2012 9.30am - 4.00pm A DAY CONFERENCE: 'Drink & Drinking in Lancashire' COST: £27 for non-members; £22 for concessions/students; £18 for members of the Institute and of the Federation. This includes tea/coffee and a buffet lunch. Vegetarians must state this on their form. Full details and a booking form are available from [email protected] Susan Bailey: School of Education, UCLAN, Preston PR1 2HE Tel. 01772 893053 9.30: Reception and tea/coffee 10.00-11.15: Alistair Mutch The Drink trade in nineteenth century Lancashire: Contrasts and comparisons. 11.15-12.30: Deborah Woodman Beerhouses in 19th Century Manchester & Salford 12.30 Lunch 13.30-2.45: Andrew Davidson Beacons for the Cause: Temperance buildings in NW England. 2.45-4.00: Annemarie McAllister Twentieth Century Temperance for Tots: a look at the Band of Hope in Lancashire, 1900-1980. ================================================================= Congratulations to Dr Alan Crosby, Mr Stephen Sartin and Dr Bill Shannon, created Burgesses during the proceedings of the Preston Guild, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • War and the Cotton Famine, 1861-65
    THE DIARY OF JAMES GARNETT OF LOW MOOR, CLITHEROE, 1858-65: PART 2 THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR AND THE COTTON FAMINE, 1861-65 BY OWEN ASHMORE, M.A. 1 AMES GARNETTS DIARY for the period of the cotton Jfamine contains a similar range of information to that for the earlier years: comments on the weather, local events, family and personal interests and activities, national and international affairs, developments at the mill, the state of trade in the cotton industry, other business interests of the Garnett family. There is, however, a particular emphasis on the effects of the war in America and the Diary regularly records the news from there, the state of raw cotton supply, with details of stocks imported from different parts of the world, the state of the markets for yarn and cloth. It is possible to learn from it a great deal about how one Lancashire firm managed during this difficult period. As in the earlier years there is the added interest of being able to compare what Garnett wrote, at least for part of the time, v/ith the comments of John O'Neil (John Ward), the Low Moor weaver, portions of whose Diary have also survived.2 Un­ fortunately the latter gave up making entries on 8 June 1862 and did not resume until 10 April 1864, so that there is a gap when the effects of the cotton famine were about at their worst. A reminder of the Garnett family situation may be helpful. At the beginning of 1861 the firm was in the hands of Thomas Garnett, aged 62, and his two sons: William, born in 1825, and James, the diarist, born in 1828.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Record Office: What's in It for Pendle
    Lancashire Record Office: What’s in it for Pendle ? Contents Who we are and what we do……………………………… 3 Visiting …………………………………………………...... 4 Online……………………………………………………….. 5 Contact……………………………………………………… 6 Maps and Photographs …………..…………………….. 7 Pendle Collections Pendle Library Collection ………………………………… 12 Pilgrim & Badgery Collection …………………………… . 16 Parker of Browsholme and Alkincoats Collection ……… 18 The Honour of Clitheroe ………………………………… . 19 Wilfred Spencer Collection………………………………… 20 Selina Cooper Collection…………………………………… 21 Local Businesses and Organisations Societies……………………………………………. 22 Trade Unions ……………………………………… 22 Employers Associations …………………………. 24 Business records ………………………………… . 25 Smaller Collections …………………………………..….. 27 Official Records Local Government Lancashire County Council Societies ………....... 28 Colne Borough Council …………………………… 29 Nelson Borough Council ………………………….. 30 Barrowford Urban District Council ………………. 32 Barnoldswick Urban District Council …………….. 32 Earby Urban District Council……………………… 33 Trawden Urban District Council …………………. 34 2 Lancashire Record Office: What’s in it for Pendle ? Pendle Borough Council ……………………… 35 Parish Councils ………………………………… 35 Electoral registers ……………………………………… 36 Court Records Quarter Sessions ……………………………….. 44 Petty Sessions and Magistrates ………………. 46 County Court ……………………………………. 47 Coroners Courts ………………………………… 48 Probate Records …………………………………..…… 49 Education Records …………………………………….. 50 Hospital Records ……………………………………….. 56 Turnpike Trusts …………………………………...…… 57 Poor Law Union
    [Show full text]
  • Dugdale Family of Lancashire Notes
    DUGDALE FAMILY OF LANCASHIRE NOTES: A History of the Dugdill and Dugdale Family Introduction These records have been compiled by Thomas Dugdill and Tim Dugdill [Timothy Michael Dugdill] during the period 1982-1989 [updated 2000] and are based on the research carried out by Robert Dugdill [Born 1883] of Rylstone Parish Register and further research by the writers of these notes, based on the Registers for all parishes in Lancashire and Yorkshire. Further information was gathered from gravestones in Rylstone and other Church cemeteries, census records to 1881 and from various publications on the history of Clitheroe up to the end of the 17th century. This particular history is based on the ancestors and descendants of Thomas and Annie Dugdill of Scale Hill Farm, Rylstone, who lived from 1875-1913 and 1873-1938 respectively. After their marriage in 1898 they farmed at Rock House Farm, Hetton from 1898-1900, The Rookery from 1900-1911 and Scale Hill Farm until their respective deaths. These notes have been compiled by Thomas Dugdill, youngest son of the above, and his son, Timothy Michael Dugdill Origins of the name Dugdill/Dugdale According to the publication ‘Baines Lancashire’ the names DUGDILL - DUGDALL –DUGDALE are all ‘locals of Dugdale, some small dale on the borders of Lancashire and Yorkshire’ Another publication ‘Homes and Family Names of Great Britain’ published in 1890 states ‘Dugdale was the name of a Clitheroe family in the reign of Elizabeth I to whom belongs Sir William Dugdale, the celebrated antiquary of the 17th century whose father settled in Warwickshire’. It also states that ‘Dugdale is a small North Staffordshire hamlet’ although on most maps there is no trace of the hamlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Clitheroe Civic Society
    Discover the FURTHER Clitheroe READING A Child’s History of Clitheroe TOWN TRAIL – Arthur Langshaw Clitheroe’s 1000 Years – Arthur Langshaw Clitheroe, From Burgage Plots to Boundary Stones TAKE A HISTORIC WALK THROUGH – Cyril Ainsworth THE RIBBLE Clitheroe in its Coaching and VALLEY'S PREMIER Railway Days MARKET TOWN – Stephen Clarke A Short History of Clitheroe in East Lancashire – David Best Clitheroe’s Learning Curve, 200 Years of Schooling – Robert O. Jones Clitheroe Historic Town Assessment Report – April 2006 Produced by Lancashire County Council Ribble Valley Borough Council??? Photography and words by Alan Dixon A town built on Designed by TPW Design Consultants | www.t-pw.com LIME, LATIN AND LAW WELCOME TO CLITHEROE This is the fourth version of the town trail which Clitheroe Civic Society has compiled since 1976 and, though the area covered is largely the same, changes within the area make updating necessary in order for it to be relevant to visitors and recent residents of the 21st century. It is largely confined to the area which was essentially the developed part of the town from about 1100 to 1800. That is, the land between castle and church, each positioned on a prominent outcrop of limestone rock, for it is this area that was virtually the whole of the original town and still is the town centre today. It will take an hour or so to complete the walk, longer of course if you visit any of the places of interest or take refreshment along the way – and there are ample opportunities for either. A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY BEFORE YOU START Around 1050 in the reign of King Canute, Earl Leofric, The complete control and ownership by the Lord of everything husband of the somewhat more famous Lady Godiva, held and everyone within the Honour changed once again with the control of much of the North West of England including the charters granted by Henry de Lacy in the mid-1100s and his Hundred of Blackburn in which Clitheroe then stood.
    [Show full text]
  • CHATBURN ROAD, DOWNHAM, LANCASHIRE Archaeological Watching Brief
    CHATBURN ROAD,DOWNHAM,LANCASHIRE Archaeological Watching Brief Client: Pendle Hill Landscape Partnership Planning Application: 3/2019/0331 NGR: 37748 44429 to 37829 44440 © Greenlane Archaeology Ltd February 2020 The Site Site Name Chatburn Road, Downham County Lancashire NGR 37748 44429 to 37829 44440 Client Client Name Pendle Hill Landscape Partnership Client’s architect/agent Sarah Dornan, Countryside Access Officer, Pendle Hill Landscape Partnership Scheme, Forest of Bowland AONB Planning Pre-planning? No Planning Application No. 3/2019/0331 Plans (e.g. conversion, extension, demolition) Creation of bridleway Condition number 6 Local Planning Authority Ribble Valley Borough Council Planning Archaeologist Planning Officer (Archaeology), Lancashire County Council Groundworks subject to watching brief Topsoil stripping and subsequent excavation for bridleway Archiving Relevant Record Office(s)/Archive Centre(s) Preston Relevant HER Lancashire Relevant museum Clitheroe Castle Museum of the Museum of Lancashire Life, Preston Staffing Desk-based assessment Dan Elsworth Watching brief Dan Elsworth and Tom Mace Report writing Dan Elsworth Report editing Jo Dawson Illustrations Tom Mace Date watching brief carried out 11th February 2020 Greenlane Archaeology Ltd, Lower Brook Street, Ulverston, Cumbria, LA12 7EE Tel: 01229 588 500 Email: [email protected] Web: www.greenlanearchaeology.co.uk Chatburn Road, Downham, Lancashire: Archaeological Watching Brief 1 Contents Summary........................................................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • The Honour of Clitheroe
    The Honour of Clitheroe (also spelled Honor) is an ancient grouping of manors and royal forests centred on Clitheroe Castle in Lancashire, England; an honour traditionally being the grant of a large landholding complex, not all of whose parts are contiguous. In the case of Clitheroe, this complex was loosely based around the ancient wapentake of Blackburnshire. Before the Norman Conquest, the lands of Blackburnshire were held by Edward the Confessor. By Domesday the land had been given by Roger de Poitou to Roger of bully and Albert Gresley. Gresley apparently resigned his fee in the Blackburnshire hundred in about 1086. In 1092, Roger de Poitou acquired a large part of what is now Lancashire, including the hundred of Blackburnshire. In 1102, Henry I granted the fee of Blackburnshire and further holdings in Hornby, and the vills of Chipping, Aighton and Dutton in Amounderness to Robert de Lacy, while confirming his possession of Bowland. These lands formed the basis of what became known as the Honour of Clitheroe. The Honour passed by marriage from the De Lacys to Thomas, Earl of Lancaster in 1311 and subsequently, was incorporated into the Duchy of Lancaster. The honour had been among the lands acquired by Queen Isabella in 1327, after she deposed Edward II. In 1507, King Henry VII's Act of Disafforestation was a response to growing encroachment on the Royal Forests and paved the way for increased settlement within the Forests of Accrington, Bowland, Pendle, Rossendale and Trawden. The Manor of Accrington New Hold was formed from the forests of Accrington and Rossendale after deforestation.
    [Show full text]