Dugdale Family of Lancashire Notes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dugdale Family of Lancashire Notes DUGDALE FAMILY OF LANCASHIRE NOTES: A History of the Dugdill and Dugdale Family Introduction These records have been compiled by Thomas Dugdill and Tim Dugdill [Timothy Michael Dugdill] during the period 1982-1989 [updated 2000] and are based on the research carried out by Robert Dugdill [Born 1883] of Rylstone Parish Register and further research by the writers of these notes, based on the Registers for all parishes in Lancashire and Yorkshire. Further information was gathered from gravestones in Rylstone and other Church cemeteries, census records to 1881 and from various publications on the history of Clitheroe up to the end of the 17th century. This particular history is based on the ancestors and descendants of Thomas and Annie Dugdill of Scale Hill Farm, Rylstone, who lived from 1875-1913 and 1873-1938 respectively. After their marriage in 1898 they farmed at Rock House Farm, Hetton from 1898-1900, The Rookery from 1900-1911 and Scale Hill Farm until their respective deaths. These notes have been compiled by Thomas Dugdill, youngest son of the above, and his son, Timothy Michael Dugdill Origins of the name Dugdill/Dugdale According to the publication ‘Baines Lancashire’ the names DUGDILL - DUGDALL –DUGDALE are all ‘locals of Dugdale, some small dale on the borders of Lancashire and Yorkshire’ Another publication ‘Homes and Family Names of Great Britain’ published in 1890 states ‘Dugdale was the name of a Clitheroe family in the reign of Elizabeth I to whom belongs Sir William Dugdale, the celebrated antiquary of the 17th century whose father settled in Warwickshire’. It also states that ‘Dugdale is a small North Staffordshire hamlet’ although on most maps there is no trace of the hamlet. The earliest mention of the name, at least found by the writer, is of an Agnes DOGHDALE in Yorkshire circa 1379. There are many variations in spelling of the name such as DOUGHDALE, DUGDALL, DUGDAILE, DUGDYLL, DUGDELL and others. It is interesting to note that the original most common spelling was DUGDALL at Clitheroe in the 17th.century, from which it is understandable how both DUGDILL and DUGDALE are derived. Dugdales are still at Clitheroe and many other areas of the U.K. Dugdills are much less numerous and mostly originate from Rylstone Parish in Yorkshire however, some branches of this line are now known as Dugdale. During the 17th.century there were DUGEDAYLLS living at Kirby Malham and one John Dugedayll married one Agnes Crayke in 1602. Cracoe takes it’s name from the Crayke family. Through the 16th.century various members of this family are recorded but the writers do not think they are connected. Other Dugdales farmed at Hubberholme and Skythornes over the same period but they, as did the Dugedaylls, died out. One other possible theory of the name origin has a Scottish connection, although it is only a wild guess from Tim Dugdill on one of his visits to his cottage in Kinecardineshire. There was a place in Dumfries and Galloway on the Scottish borders which was called Douglasdale but, on some documents inspected, was shortened to Doug’dale. After the Battle of Bannockburn Scottish raiders deluged Yorkshire, in fact much of Skipton was badly razed by them, and it is just possible that one of the marauders stayed and used the name from whence he had come. 1 This is merely speculation, but what is certain is that the Dugdill family origins are at Clitheroe as the following research hopefully indicates. The Dugdalls of Clitheroe 1500-1700 The earliest record of the name is in 1576 when a Jacobi Dugdall had a son baptised and in 1577 a John Dugdall had a son baptised, also called Richard, which would indicate that both Jacobi and John must have been born between 1540 -1550. The registers for Clitheroe are missing from 1626 to 1653 and the only information about this period is to be found in ‘Clitheroe on the Seventeenth Century’ by William Self Weeks FSA. This book gives more information about Clitheroe and it’s inhabitants than those registers which are available. Dugdall was by far the most common name indeed, according to Weeks, the name appears in the reords no less than 89 times between 1570 –1626. The population of Clitheroe at that time was only a few hundred. The earliest ‘call list’, according to Weeks, was that for 1589.These lists were compiled of men who elected bailiffes, burgesses and members of Parliament, as well as being a list of men to serve as jurors on the ‘ Court Leet’ , which was held from time to time. The 1589 ‘Leet’ states that both Edmund and Richard Dugdall were burgesses and lists as inhabitants William [Senior and Junior], Walter, Hugh, Nicholas, John and Edward. The most complete ‘call list’ is that for the Court Leet held on 30th.October, 1593, when a complete list of officials and inhabitants are shown. Dugdalls included are :- Out Burgesses [Lived outside Clitheroe] The heirs of Edmund and William In Burgesses [Lived in the town] Nicholas Inhabitants William, Hugh, Nicholas, Henry [Junior], William [Senior], William [Junior], Walter, John and Edward. The Burgesse’s names are obviously repeated under Inhabitants. From the mid 16th.Century to the end of the 17th.Century the DUGDALLS were always Bailiffes, Burgesses, Constables or Seargeants of the Borough of Cliderowe [Clitheroe] and it may be interesting to know the duties of such officials at the time :- Bailiffe The head man of the Borough, second only to the Lord of the Manor. His duties consisted of collecting tithes and market dues, marrying people if not married in the Church [similar to registry offices today], leading official ceremonies and parades particularly on market days, swearing in other officials such as Burgesses and Seargeants and officiating at Court Leets Burgess He assisted the Bailiffe and attended the Court Leet sessions as the equivalent of a juror. There were two types of Burgess, the In-Burgess who must live within the town and the out-Burgess from the countryside surrounding the town. Seargeants and Constables 2 These were appointed to keep law and order and arrest felons and wrongdoers. They could be either male or female but, should they be elected and refuse to serve, they would be ‘brought up’ at the Leet and fined. All these officials were appointed for one year but could, and often did, serve for more than one term. Presumably they received some form of payment or expenses. It would appear from the requirements of these offices that those appointed would be able to read and write. Throughout the 17th Century members of the Dugdall family were very active in the public affairs of Clitheroe because, as well as the previously detailed officials, they are also shown in records as those voting in Parliamentary elections. For instance, in the 1627 election Richard Senior, Richard Junior, John and Thomas had two votes and in the election of 1640, the last before the Civil War, Richard Senior, Richard Junior, John, Thomas, Nicholas and William also had two votes. It has not been possible to trace who supported whom in the Civil War as those records make no reference to allegiance, but further research would be interesting to show whether the Dugdalls were for Cromwell or King. Although taking part in public life and official positions they nevertheless also appear frequently in the Court Leet records of the times, as the following extracts illustrate :- 1st July, 1600 William Dugdall [In-Bailiffe] was amersed [fined] two pence for ‘Layinge his worthinge in the street’ 26th July, 1600 William Dugdall [In Bailiffe] was amersed six pence for the same offence [Slow learners aren’t we! – TMD] 8th January, 1645 John Dugdall [Elder] for ‘Not dressing the street outside his house’ amersed ten pence 29th.April, 1647 For the same offence 23rd October, 1645 John Dugdall [Corporal] for ‘Makinge affray and drawinge blood upon ye boddie of Robte Greenman’. Also, at the same Court Leet, the same John Dugdall was fined two shillings and sixpence for assaulting his son John. 18th October, 1649 Presentment of Thomas Dugdall [Burgess] for ‘removeninge a meare [boundary] stone out of the waye leadinge between Mearley and Cliderowe lying in a close called Gilscroft’ and the jury laid a stipulation that ‘Thomas Dugdall, Burgess, shall lay the Meare Stonne in its right place in Gilscroft betwixt this and the first of April next’ 3rd May, 1666 John Dugdall [Alderman] fined six shillings and eight pence for ‘Makinge affray and drawing blood’ 10th October, 1608 John Dugdall [Shoemaker] fined for ‘Breakinge of the lattes in the wyndo of the wife of William Malton and cominge into her home in the night time’. [Out of character – TMD] 22nd October, 1646 Ellen Hoult fined twelve pence for ‘Raylinge and scowlinge on Jane Dugdall the Wyffe of William Dugdall 3 Perhaps there is a sequel to this where there is a record of ‘Jane Dugdall, the wyeffe of William Dugdall, for makinge an affray on the bodie of Ellen Hoult’ 3rd May, 1666 ‘Margaret the wyeffe of Nicholas Dugdall, taylor of this town, is a common scold with her neybourers. The said Margaret is an eavesdropper and sets debate and some dissention amongst her neybourers’ 21st May, 1650 A possible case of witchcraft was tried, the charge being that ‘Nicholas Dugdall and Jennot his wife versus Edmund Dugdall of Cliderowe and Margaret his wife Thou [The said Nicholas] and thy wyefe killed my child’ There are many more entries in the Court Leet records similar to those extracted. There were so many Dugdalls living in Clitheroe during the 17th Century that it was impossible to establish what relationship each was to the other, although undoubtedly they were the same family.
Recommended publications
  • Notes on Stanbury
    D R A F T NOTES ON THE LORDSHIP AND MANOR OF STANBURY Pre-History Evidence of Mesolithic settlement on upland sites in the NW of West Yorkshire along the major watersheds; evidence from Stanbury Moor in the form of three geometric microliths. 1 Bronze Age Stone circle discovered near the site of Walshaw Dean reservoir (SD 967343) on Wadsworth Moor to the SW of Stanbury Moor. The circle, 11 metres in diameter, surrounded a smaller circle, also built of stones. A second circle (SD 96213155) surveyed by the Ordnance Survey in 1962 thought to be a hut circle rather than a ceremonial circle. 2 Numerous additional National Monuments are also situated within the boundaries of the Manor of Stanbury. Anglo-Saxon Place-name: Old English Stan Burh “Stone Fortification”. Editor notes (1961) that “no trace of the fortification remains”. 3 “It is extremely difficult to isolate specific Mercian place-names. Even those containing definite Mercian forms, such as the inflected bury, rather than the uninflected borough from the OE burh (e.g. Stanbury, Dewsbury) may not go back to the 7th century, but may simply be the result of Mercian elements in the local dialect. Moreover, even if a place bears a probable Mercian name, this cannot be taken to indicate that it was actually occupied by Mercians.. It is, therefore, impossible at present to isolate specific Mercian settlements, but the possibility of their existence must be borne in mind in the course of future archaeological work in the county, especially in Agbrigg and Morley wapentakes, where the strongest evidence for Mercian influence is to be found in the place-names.” 4 Manor of Bradford held by Gamel.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page Table of Contents Preface to the 1994
    Christopher Marlowe (1564-1607) A Biography g Louis Ule A Hearthstone Book Carlton Press Corp. * New York Acknowledgments g JJermission to reproduce the illustrations (following page lr 290) in this biography was granted as follows: for pages I from the Revels Accounts by the Public Record Office; tor the title page from the L593 edition of Edznard II by the \-ictoria and Albert Museum; for the Cambridge portrait of Christopher Marlowe by the Master and Fellows bf Corpus Christi College, Cambridge; for the Massacre at Paris fragment s- the Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, DC; for the Hampton Court portrait by The Royal Collectiory St. james Palace, London; for the Venice portrait by the Picture Gallery and Museum of the Royal Shakespeare Theatre; for the title paggs of Sir Philip Sidney's Acradia and his Apology for Poetry bv the Henry E. Huntington Library and Museum; for Man- tegna's ludith and Holofernes, by the National Gallery of Art, \Vashington, DC; for letters of Hugh Sanford by Walter J. G. Verco, M.V.O., Chester Herald of Arms, College of Arms; for Sir William Dugdale's 1634 pen-and-ink sketch of the Shake- speare monument by Sir William Dugdale, Bart. Merevale Hall, Atherstone, Warwickshire; for MS. Cotton Julius C. III i. 280" (handwriting presumed to be that of William Cotton) by the British Library; for altered copy of the Baines note, BL Harley MS 6853 ff307-:308, by the British Library. Contents Preface to the 1994Private Printing ix Introduction xi 1. Origins and Background 1 2. The King's School, Canterbury 11 J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basset Family: Marriage Connections and Socio-Political Networks
    THE BASSET FAMILY: MARRIAGE CONNECTIONS AND SOCIO-POLITICAL NETWORKS IN MEDIEVAL STAFFORDSHIRE AND BEYOND A THESIS IN History Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS By RACHAEL HAZELL B. A. Drury University, 2011 Kansas City, Missouri THE BASSET FAMILY: MARRIAGE CONNECTIONS AND SOCIO-POLITICAL NETWORKS IN MEDIEVAL STAFFORDSHIRE AND BEYOND Rachael Hazell, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri- Kansas City, 2015 ABSTRACT The political turmoil of the eleventh to fourteenth centuries in England had far reaching consequences for nearly everyone. Noble families especially had the added pressure of ensuring wise political alliances While maintaining and acquiring land and wealth. Although this pressure would have been felt throughout England, the political and economic success of the county of Staffordshire, home to the Basset family, hinged on its political structure, as Well as its geographical placement. Although it Was not as subject to Welsh invasions as neighboring Shropshire, such invasions had indirect destabilizing effects on the county. PoWerful baronial families of the time sought to gain land and favor through strategic alliances. Marriage frequently played a role in helping connect families, even across borders, and this Was the case for people of all social levels. As the leadership of England fluctuated, revolts and rebellions called poWerful families to dedicate their allegiances either to the king or to the rebellion. Either way, during the central and late Middle Ages, the West Midlands was an area of unrest. Between geography, weather, invaders from abroad, and internal political debate, the unrest in Staffordshire Would create an environment Where location, iii alliances, and family netWorks could make or break a family’s successes or failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire
    Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire Archaeological Building Investigation Oxford Archaeology North September 2008 Turner and Townsend and English Heritage Issue No: 2008-09/803 OAN Job No: L9899 NGR: SD 7424 4169 Planning Application 3/2006/1047 and 3/2007/0039 Document Title: Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire Document Type: Archaeological Building Investigation Client Name: Turner and Townsend and English Heritage Issue Number: 2008-09/803 OA Job Number: L9899 National Grid Reference: NGR SD 7424 4169 Prepared by: Karl Taylor Position: Project Officer Date: September 2008 Checked by: Jamie Quartermaine Signed……………………. Position: Senior Project Manager Date: September 2008 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: September 2008 Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd 2008 Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria House, 34 Wellgate, Clitheroe, Lancashire
    VICTORIA HOUSE, 34 WELLGATE, CLITHEROE, LANCASHIRE Archaeological Watching Brief Oxford Archaeology North September 2006 JYM Partnership Issue No: 2006-7/485 OAN Job No: L9653 NGR: SD 7450 4185 Planning Reference: 3/2005/0770 Document Title: VICTORIA HOUSE, 34 WELLGATE, CLITHEROE, LANCASHIRE Document Type: Archaeological Watching Brief Client Name: JYM Partnership Issue Number: 2006-7/485 OA Job Number: L9653 National Grid Reference: NGR SD 7450 4185 Prepared by: Steve Clarke Position: Assistant Supervisor Date: September 2006 Checked by: Alison Plummer Signed……………………. Position: Senior Project Manager Date: September 2006 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: September 2006 Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd 2006 Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Res and Disc.Indd
    RESEARCHES AND DISCOVERIES Martin, C.T., 1877, Catalogue of the Archives in the Muniment Rooms of All Souls’ College, p. 65 (Spottiswoode & Co, London). https://books.google.com.au/books?id=JtTOAAAAMAAJ Richardson, D., 2011, Magna Carta Ancestry, p. 564 (second edn, self-published). https://books.google.com.au/books?id=8JcbV309c5UC Rymer, T., 1739-1745, Rymer’s Foedera with Syllabus, Volume II, pp. 273-279 (London). British History Online. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/rymer-foedera/vol11/pp273-279 ‘Some Notes on English Medieval Genealogy’, Abstracts of Feet of Fines http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_117A_345.shtml Virgoe, R., 2006, Some Ancient Indictments in the King’s Bench referring to Kent 1450- 1452, p. 236, Kent Archaeological Society Records, vol. 18. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/5/236.htm WHEN was CANTERBURY CATHEDRAL’S MedievaL LIBRARY BUILDING DEMOLISHED? As a major Benedictine house, the priory of Christ Church Canterbury was a considerable user of books. Lanfranc’s rebuilding in the 1070s did not include a library; it is assumed that books were kept in cupboards in the cloister, as was normal in a monastery. By the late-twelfth century, a more commodious book store had been provided in the closed-off passageway leading out from the cloisters to which an upper floor was added in the early fourteenth century.1 By the mid fourteenth century many books had left Canterbury to stock libraries in its daughter houses, especially at Canterbury College in Oxford where Canterbury monks went to study at the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Medieval Colonisation in the Forests of Howland, Knaresborough and Pickering
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF HOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Hull by MAURICE TURNER, B.Sc., B.A., OCTOBER, 1987 POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF BOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING Contents Preface Chapter I The material of the thesis and the methods of Page 1 investigation Chapter II The medieval background to encroachment Page 7 a) The utilisation of forest land b) The nature of medieval clearance c) Early clearances in the Forest of Pickering d) Medieval colonisation in Bowland Forest e) Migration into Knaresborough Forest after the Black Death f) The medieval settlement pattern in Knaresborough Forest g) Measures of forest land Chapter III Tenures, Rents and Taxes in the Tudor Forests Page 36 a) The evidence of the Tudor Lay Subsidies b) The evidence of manorial rent rolls C) Tudor encroachment on the common wastes Chapter IV The demographic experience of forest Page 53 parishes Chapter V The reasons for encroachment Page 73 a) The problem of poverty in 17th century England b) The evidence for subdivision of holdings c) Changes in the size of tenements with time d) Subdivided holdings in Forests other than Knaresborough Chapter VI Illegal encroachment in the Forest of Knaresborough Page 96 a) The creation of new hamlets 1600 - 1669 b) The slowing down of encroachment in the late 17th century c) The physical form of squatter encroachments as compared to copyholder intakes before 1730 Chapter VII Alternative
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Lancashire Manorial Records Final
    Lancashire Archives A Guide to Manorial Records Sarah Rose, Eleanor Straughton and Angus Winchester Lancashire Archives Lancaster University 2012 Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Text copyright © S. Rose, E. Straughton and A. Winchester LANCASTER U N I V E R S I T Y Lancashire Archives Lancashire Record Office Bow Lane Preston PR1 2RE 01772 533039 [email protected] www.archives.lancashire.gov.uk Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Contents Introduction 2 What are Manorial Records? 2 What is a Manor? 2 Manor courts 3 Subjects of Court Jurisdiction and Enquiry Manorial Tenants Manorial Rights Manorial Records 7 Interpreting the Record of a Manor Court 9 Locating Manorial Records 10 Manorial Documents Register Record Office Lists and Catalogues Major Collections of Lancashire Manorial Records Superior Lordships in Lancashire 11 Manorial Records for Local and Family History 13 Sources for Family History Sources for the History of the Community Sources for Property History Sources for the History of the Local Environment Further Reading 16 Glossary 19 Examples 24 1 Introduction This guide has been produced on behalf of Lancashire Archives as part of a collaborative project, run by The National Archives and Lancaster University, to digitise the Manorial Documents Register for Lancashire. The aim of this project is to raise awareness and encourage the use of manorial records. Parts of this guide have been reproduced from the Cumbrian Manorial Records website, which was created as part of the Cumbrian MDR project in 2006. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/manorialrecords/index.htm All the examples in this guide relate to the records of Lancashire manors held in collections at Lancashire Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • L.L.H.F. Newsletter 02
    local LANCASHIRE LOCAL HISTORY FEDERATION NEWSLETTER history ISSUE NO.2 federation SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2012 ancashire ====================================================================== Bob Dobson (Publicity Officer, Federation) sends this important reminder: *****Membership of this Federation is free until the end of 2013. Details from: Treasurer and Membership Secretary Mrs N.M.Hollings, 9 Park House,Gorseyfields,Droylsden,Manchester. M43 6DX : [email protected] ====================================================================== LLHF NEWSLETTER EDITOR: Mrs M. Edwards. Telephone: 0161 256 6585 email: [email protected] DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE: JANUARY 14TH, 2013. ======================================================================= Jointly organised by UCLAN Institute of Local & Family History and the Lancashire Local History Federation Saturday, 20th October, 2012 9.30am - 4.00pm A DAY CONFERENCE: 'Drink & Drinking in Lancashire' COST: £27 for non-members; £22 for concessions/students; £18 for members of the Institute and of the Federation. This includes tea/coffee and a buffet lunch. Vegetarians must state this on their form. Full details and a booking form are available from [email protected] Susan Bailey: School of Education, UCLAN, Preston PR1 2HE Tel. 01772 893053 9.30: Reception and tea/coffee 10.00-11.15: Alistair Mutch The Drink trade in nineteenth century Lancashire: Contrasts and comparisons. 11.15-12.30: Deborah Woodman Beerhouses in 19th Century Manchester & Salford 12.30 Lunch 13.30-2.45: Andrew Davidson Beacons for the Cause: Temperance buildings in NW England. 2.45-4.00: Annemarie McAllister Twentieth Century Temperance for Tots: a look at the Band of Hope in Lancashire, 1900-1980. ================================================================= Congratulations to Dr Alan Crosby, Mr Stephen Sartin and Dr Bill Shannon, created Burgesses during the proceedings of the Preston Guild, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • George Abbot 1562-1633 Archbishop of Canterbury
    English Book Owners in the Seventeenth Century: A Work in Progress Listing How much do we really know about patterns and impacts of book ownership in Britain in the seventeenth century? How well equipped are we to answer questions such as the following?: • What was a typical private library, in terms of size and content, in the seventeenth century? • How does the answer to that question vary according to occupation, social status, etc? • How does the answer vary over time? – how different are ownership patterns in the middle of the century from those of the beginning, and how different are they again at the end? Having sound answers to these questions will contribute significantly to our understanding of print culture and the history of the book more widely during this period. Our current state of knowledge is both imperfect, and fragmented. There is no directory or comprehensive reference source on seventeenth-century British book owners, although there are numerous studies of individual collectors. There are well-known names who are regularly cited in this context – Cotton, Dering, Pepys – and accepted wisdom as to collections which were particularly interesting or outstanding, but there is much in this area that deserves to be challenged. Private Libraries in Renaissance England and Books in Cambridge Inventories have developed a more comprehensive approach to a particular (academic) kind of owner, but they are largely focused on the sixteenth century. Sears Jayne, Library Catalogues of the English Renaissance, extends coverage to 1640, based on book lists found in a variety of manuscript sources. Evidence of book ownership in this period is manifested in a variety of ways, which need to be brought together if we are to develop that fuller picture.
    [Show full text]
  • War and the Cotton Famine, 1861-65
    THE DIARY OF JAMES GARNETT OF LOW MOOR, CLITHEROE, 1858-65: PART 2 THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR AND THE COTTON FAMINE, 1861-65 BY OWEN ASHMORE, M.A. 1 AMES GARNETTS DIARY for the period of the cotton Jfamine contains a similar range of information to that for the earlier years: comments on the weather, local events, family and personal interests and activities, national and international affairs, developments at the mill, the state of trade in the cotton industry, other business interests of the Garnett family. There is, however, a particular emphasis on the effects of the war in America and the Diary regularly records the news from there, the state of raw cotton supply, with details of stocks imported from different parts of the world, the state of the markets for yarn and cloth. It is possible to learn from it a great deal about how one Lancashire firm managed during this difficult period. As in the earlier years there is the added interest of being able to compare what Garnett wrote, at least for part of the time, v/ith the comments of John O'Neil (John Ward), the Low Moor weaver, portions of whose Diary have also survived.2 Un­ fortunately the latter gave up making entries on 8 June 1862 and did not resume until 10 April 1864, so that there is a gap when the effects of the cotton famine were about at their worst. A reminder of the Garnett family situation may be helpful. At the beginning of 1861 the firm was in the hands of Thomas Garnett, aged 62, and his two sons: William, born in 1825, and James, the diarist, born in 1828.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Record Office: What's in It for Pendle
    Lancashire Record Office: What’s in it for Pendle ? Contents Who we are and what we do……………………………… 3 Visiting …………………………………………………...... 4 Online……………………………………………………….. 5 Contact……………………………………………………… 6 Maps and Photographs …………..…………………….. 7 Pendle Collections Pendle Library Collection ………………………………… 12 Pilgrim & Badgery Collection …………………………… . 16 Parker of Browsholme and Alkincoats Collection ……… 18 The Honour of Clitheroe ………………………………… . 19 Wilfred Spencer Collection………………………………… 20 Selina Cooper Collection…………………………………… 21 Local Businesses and Organisations Societies……………………………………………. 22 Trade Unions ……………………………………… 22 Employers Associations …………………………. 24 Business records ………………………………… . 25 Smaller Collections …………………………………..….. 27 Official Records Local Government Lancashire County Council Societies ………....... 28 Colne Borough Council …………………………… 29 Nelson Borough Council ………………………….. 30 Barrowford Urban District Council ………………. 32 Barnoldswick Urban District Council …………….. 32 Earby Urban District Council……………………… 33 Trawden Urban District Council …………………. 34 2 Lancashire Record Office: What’s in it for Pendle ? Pendle Borough Council ……………………… 35 Parish Councils ………………………………… 35 Electoral registers ……………………………………… 36 Court Records Quarter Sessions ……………………………….. 44 Petty Sessions and Magistrates ………………. 46 County Court ……………………………………. 47 Coroners Courts ………………………………… 48 Probate Records …………………………………..…… 49 Education Records …………………………………….. 50 Hospital Records ……………………………………….. 56 Turnpike Trusts …………………………………...…… 57 Poor Law Union
    [Show full text]