Dugdale Family of Lancashire Notes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Notes on Stanbury
D R A F T NOTES ON THE LORDSHIP AND MANOR OF STANBURY Pre-History Evidence of Mesolithic settlement on upland sites in the NW of West Yorkshire along the major watersheds; evidence from Stanbury Moor in the form of three geometric microliths. 1 Bronze Age Stone circle discovered near the site of Walshaw Dean reservoir (SD 967343) on Wadsworth Moor to the SW of Stanbury Moor. The circle, 11 metres in diameter, surrounded a smaller circle, also built of stones. A second circle (SD 96213155) surveyed by the Ordnance Survey in 1962 thought to be a hut circle rather than a ceremonial circle. 2 Numerous additional National Monuments are also situated within the boundaries of the Manor of Stanbury. Anglo-Saxon Place-name: Old English Stan Burh “Stone Fortification”. Editor notes (1961) that “no trace of the fortification remains”. 3 “It is extremely difficult to isolate specific Mercian place-names. Even those containing definite Mercian forms, such as the inflected bury, rather than the uninflected borough from the OE burh (e.g. Stanbury, Dewsbury) may not go back to the 7th century, but may simply be the result of Mercian elements in the local dialect. Moreover, even if a place bears a probable Mercian name, this cannot be taken to indicate that it was actually occupied by Mercians.. It is, therefore, impossible at present to isolate specific Mercian settlements, but the possibility of their existence must be borne in mind in the course of future archaeological work in the county, especially in Agbrigg and Morley wapentakes, where the strongest evidence for Mercian influence is to be found in the place-names.” 4 Manor of Bradford held by Gamel. -
Title Page Table of Contents Preface to the 1994
Christopher Marlowe (1564-1607) A Biography g Louis Ule A Hearthstone Book Carlton Press Corp. * New York Acknowledgments g JJermission to reproduce the illustrations (following page lr 290) in this biography was granted as follows: for pages I from the Revels Accounts by the Public Record Office; tor the title page from the L593 edition of Edznard II by the \-ictoria and Albert Museum; for the Cambridge portrait of Christopher Marlowe by the Master and Fellows bf Corpus Christi College, Cambridge; for the Massacre at Paris fragment s- the Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, DC; for the Hampton Court portrait by The Royal Collectiory St. james Palace, London; for the Venice portrait by the Picture Gallery and Museum of the Royal Shakespeare Theatre; for the title paggs of Sir Philip Sidney's Acradia and his Apology for Poetry bv the Henry E. Huntington Library and Museum; for Man- tegna's ludith and Holofernes, by the National Gallery of Art, \Vashington, DC; for letters of Hugh Sanford by Walter J. G. Verco, M.V.O., Chester Herald of Arms, College of Arms; for Sir William Dugdale's 1634 pen-and-ink sketch of the Shake- speare monument by Sir William Dugdale, Bart. Merevale Hall, Atherstone, Warwickshire; for MS. Cotton Julius C. III i. 280" (handwriting presumed to be that of William Cotton) by the British Library; for altered copy of the Baines note, BL Harley MS 6853 ff307-:308, by the British Library. Contents Preface to the 1994Private Printing ix Introduction xi 1. Origins and Background 1 2. The King's School, Canterbury 11 J. -
The Basset Family: Marriage Connections and Socio-Political Networks
THE BASSET FAMILY: MARRIAGE CONNECTIONS AND SOCIO-POLITICAL NETWORKS IN MEDIEVAL STAFFORDSHIRE AND BEYOND A THESIS IN History Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS By RACHAEL HAZELL B. A. Drury University, 2011 Kansas City, Missouri THE BASSET FAMILY: MARRIAGE CONNECTIONS AND SOCIO-POLITICAL NETWORKS IN MEDIEVAL STAFFORDSHIRE AND BEYOND Rachael Hazell, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri- Kansas City, 2015 ABSTRACT The political turmoil of the eleventh to fourteenth centuries in England had far reaching consequences for nearly everyone. Noble families especially had the added pressure of ensuring wise political alliances While maintaining and acquiring land and wealth. Although this pressure would have been felt throughout England, the political and economic success of the county of Staffordshire, home to the Basset family, hinged on its political structure, as Well as its geographical placement. Although it Was not as subject to Welsh invasions as neighboring Shropshire, such invasions had indirect destabilizing effects on the county. PoWerful baronial families of the time sought to gain land and favor through strategic alliances. Marriage frequently played a role in helping connect families, even across borders, and this Was the case for people of all social levels. As the leadership of England fluctuated, revolts and rebellions called poWerful families to dedicate their allegiances either to the king or to the rebellion. Either way, during the central and late Middle Ages, the West Midlands was an area of unrest. Between geography, weather, invaders from abroad, and internal political debate, the unrest in Staffordshire Would create an environment Where location, iii alliances, and family netWorks could make or break a family’s successes or failures. -
Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire
Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire Archaeological Building Investigation Oxford Archaeology North September 2008 Turner and Townsend and English Heritage Issue No: 2008-09/803 OAN Job No: L9899 NGR: SD 7424 4169 Planning Application 3/2006/1047 and 3/2007/0039 Document Title: Clitheroe Castle, Clitheroe, Lancashire Document Type: Archaeological Building Investigation Client Name: Turner and Townsend and English Heritage Issue Number: 2008-09/803 OA Job Number: L9899 National Grid Reference: NGR SD 7424 4169 Prepared by: Karl Taylor Position: Project Officer Date: September 2008 Checked by: Jamie Quartermaine Signed……………………. Position: Senior Project Manager Date: September 2008 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: September 2008 Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd 2008 Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. -
Victoria House, 34 Wellgate, Clitheroe, Lancashire
VICTORIA HOUSE, 34 WELLGATE, CLITHEROE, LANCASHIRE Archaeological Watching Brief Oxford Archaeology North September 2006 JYM Partnership Issue No: 2006-7/485 OAN Job No: L9653 NGR: SD 7450 4185 Planning Reference: 3/2005/0770 Document Title: VICTORIA HOUSE, 34 WELLGATE, CLITHEROE, LANCASHIRE Document Type: Archaeological Watching Brief Client Name: JYM Partnership Issue Number: 2006-7/485 OA Job Number: L9653 National Grid Reference: NGR SD 7450 4185 Prepared by: Steve Clarke Position: Assistant Supervisor Date: September 2006 Checked by: Alison Plummer Signed……………………. Position: Senior Project Manager Date: September 2006 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: September 2006 Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd 2006 Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. -
15 Res and Disc.Indd
RESEARCHES AND DISCOVERIES Martin, C.T., 1877, Catalogue of the Archives in the Muniment Rooms of All Souls’ College, p. 65 (Spottiswoode & Co, London). https://books.google.com.au/books?id=JtTOAAAAMAAJ Richardson, D., 2011, Magna Carta Ancestry, p. 564 (second edn, self-published). https://books.google.com.au/books?id=8JcbV309c5UC Rymer, T., 1739-1745, Rymer’s Foedera with Syllabus, Volume II, pp. 273-279 (London). British History Online. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/rymer-foedera/vol11/pp273-279 ‘Some Notes on English Medieval Genealogy’, Abstracts of Feet of Fines http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_117A_345.shtml Virgoe, R., 2006, Some Ancient Indictments in the King’s Bench referring to Kent 1450- 1452, p. 236, Kent Archaeological Society Records, vol. 18. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/5/236.htm WHEN was CANTERBURY CATHEDRAL’S MedievaL LIBRARY BUILDING DEMOLISHED? As a major Benedictine house, the priory of Christ Church Canterbury was a considerable user of books. Lanfranc’s rebuilding in the 1070s did not include a library; it is assumed that books were kept in cupboards in the cloister, as was normal in a monastery. By the late-twelfth century, a more commodious book store had been provided in the closed-off passageway leading out from the cloisters to which an upper floor was added in the early fourteenth century.1 By the mid fourteenth century many books had left Canterbury to stock libraries in its daughter houses, especially at Canterbury College in Oxford where Canterbury monks went to study at the university. -
Post-Medieval Colonisation in the Forests of Howland, Knaresborough and Pickering
THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF HOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Hull by MAURICE TURNER, B.Sc., B.A., OCTOBER, 1987 POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF BOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING Contents Preface Chapter I The material of the thesis and the methods of Page 1 investigation Chapter II The medieval background to encroachment Page 7 a) The utilisation of forest land b) The nature of medieval clearance c) Early clearances in the Forest of Pickering d) Medieval colonisation in Bowland Forest e) Migration into Knaresborough Forest after the Black Death f) The medieval settlement pattern in Knaresborough Forest g) Measures of forest land Chapter III Tenures, Rents and Taxes in the Tudor Forests Page 36 a) The evidence of the Tudor Lay Subsidies b) The evidence of manorial rent rolls C) Tudor encroachment on the common wastes Chapter IV The demographic experience of forest Page 53 parishes Chapter V The reasons for encroachment Page 73 a) The problem of poverty in 17th century England b) The evidence for subdivision of holdings c) Changes in the size of tenements with time d) Subdivided holdings in Forests other than Knaresborough Chapter VI Illegal encroachment in the Forest of Knaresborough Page 96 a) The creation of new hamlets 1600 - 1669 b) The slowing down of encroachment in the late 17th century c) The physical form of squatter encroachments as compared to copyholder intakes before 1730 Chapter VII Alternative -
Guide to Lancashire Manorial Records Final
Lancashire Archives A Guide to Manorial Records Sarah Rose, Eleanor Straughton and Angus Winchester Lancashire Archives Lancaster University 2012 Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Text copyright © S. Rose, E. Straughton and A. Winchester LANCASTER U N I V E R S I T Y Lancashire Archives Lancashire Record Office Bow Lane Preston PR1 2RE 01772 533039 [email protected] www.archives.lancashire.gov.uk Lancashire Archives: A Guide to Manorial Records Contents Introduction 2 What are Manorial Records? 2 What is a Manor? 2 Manor courts 3 Subjects of Court Jurisdiction and Enquiry Manorial Tenants Manorial Rights Manorial Records 7 Interpreting the Record of a Manor Court 9 Locating Manorial Records 10 Manorial Documents Register Record Office Lists and Catalogues Major Collections of Lancashire Manorial Records Superior Lordships in Lancashire 11 Manorial Records for Local and Family History 13 Sources for Family History Sources for the History of the Community Sources for Property History Sources for the History of the Local Environment Further Reading 16 Glossary 19 Examples 24 1 Introduction This guide has been produced on behalf of Lancashire Archives as part of a collaborative project, run by The National Archives and Lancaster University, to digitise the Manorial Documents Register for Lancashire. The aim of this project is to raise awareness and encourage the use of manorial records. Parts of this guide have been reproduced from the Cumbrian Manorial Records website, which was created as part of the Cumbrian MDR project in 2006. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/manorialrecords/index.htm All the examples in this guide relate to the records of Lancashire manors held in collections at Lancashire Archives. -
L.L.H.F. Newsletter 02
local LANCASHIRE LOCAL HISTORY FEDERATION NEWSLETTER history ISSUE NO.2 federation SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2012 ancashire ====================================================================== Bob Dobson (Publicity Officer, Federation) sends this important reminder: *****Membership of this Federation is free until the end of 2013. Details from: Treasurer and Membership Secretary Mrs N.M.Hollings, 9 Park House,Gorseyfields,Droylsden,Manchester. M43 6DX : [email protected] ====================================================================== LLHF NEWSLETTER EDITOR: Mrs M. Edwards. Telephone: 0161 256 6585 email: [email protected] DEADLINE FOR NEXT ISSUE: JANUARY 14TH, 2013. ======================================================================= Jointly organised by UCLAN Institute of Local & Family History and the Lancashire Local History Federation Saturday, 20th October, 2012 9.30am - 4.00pm A DAY CONFERENCE: 'Drink & Drinking in Lancashire' COST: £27 for non-members; £22 for concessions/students; £18 for members of the Institute and of the Federation. This includes tea/coffee and a buffet lunch. Vegetarians must state this on their form. Full details and a booking form are available from [email protected] Susan Bailey: School of Education, UCLAN, Preston PR1 2HE Tel. 01772 893053 9.30: Reception and tea/coffee 10.00-11.15: Alistair Mutch The Drink trade in nineteenth century Lancashire: Contrasts and comparisons. 11.15-12.30: Deborah Woodman Beerhouses in 19th Century Manchester & Salford 12.30 Lunch 13.30-2.45: Andrew Davidson Beacons for the Cause: Temperance buildings in NW England. 2.45-4.00: Annemarie McAllister Twentieth Century Temperance for Tots: a look at the Band of Hope in Lancashire, 1900-1980. ================================================================= Congratulations to Dr Alan Crosby, Mr Stephen Sartin and Dr Bill Shannon, created Burgesses during the proceedings of the Preston Guild, 2012. -
George Abbot 1562-1633 Archbishop of Canterbury
English Book Owners in the Seventeenth Century: A Work in Progress Listing How much do we really know about patterns and impacts of book ownership in Britain in the seventeenth century? How well equipped are we to answer questions such as the following?: • What was a typical private library, in terms of size and content, in the seventeenth century? • How does the answer to that question vary according to occupation, social status, etc? • How does the answer vary over time? – how different are ownership patterns in the middle of the century from those of the beginning, and how different are they again at the end? Having sound answers to these questions will contribute significantly to our understanding of print culture and the history of the book more widely during this period. Our current state of knowledge is both imperfect, and fragmented. There is no directory or comprehensive reference source on seventeenth-century British book owners, although there are numerous studies of individual collectors. There are well-known names who are regularly cited in this context – Cotton, Dering, Pepys – and accepted wisdom as to collections which were particularly interesting or outstanding, but there is much in this area that deserves to be challenged. Private Libraries in Renaissance England and Books in Cambridge Inventories have developed a more comprehensive approach to a particular (academic) kind of owner, but they are largely focused on the sixteenth century. Sears Jayne, Library Catalogues of the English Renaissance, extends coverage to 1640, based on book lists found in a variety of manuscript sources. Evidence of book ownership in this period is manifested in a variety of ways, which need to be brought together if we are to develop that fuller picture. -
War and the Cotton Famine, 1861-65
THE DIARY OF JAMES GARNETT OF LOW MOOR, CLITHEROE, 1858-65: PART 2 THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR AND THE COTTON FAMINE, 1861-65 BY OWEN ASHMORE, M.A. 1 AMES GARNETTS DIARY for the period of the cotton Jfamine contains a similar range of information to that for the earlier years: comments on the weather, local events, family and personal interests and activities, national and international affairs, developments at the mill, the state of trade in the cotton industry, other business interests of the Garnett family. There is, however, a particular emphasis on the effects of the war in America and the Diary regularly records the news from there, the state of raw cotton supply, with details of stocks imported from different parts of the world, the state of the markets for yarn and cloth. It is possible to learn from it a great deal about how one Lancashire firm managed during this difficult period. As in the earlier years there is the added interest of being able to compare what Garnett wrote, at least for part of the time, v/ith the comments of John O'Neil (John Ward), the Low Moor weaver, portions of whose Diary have also survived.2 Un fortunately the latter gave up making entries on 8 June 1862 and did not resume until 10 April 1864, so that there is a gap when the effects of the cotton famine were about at their worst. A reminder of the Garnett family situation may be helpful. At the beginning of 1861 the firm was in the hands of Thomas Garnett, aged 62, and his two sons: William, born in 1825, and James, the diarist, born in 1828. -
Lancashire Record Office: What's in It for Pendle
Lancashire Record Office: What’s in it for Pendle ? Contents Who we are and what we do……………………………… 3 Visiting …………………………………………………...... 4 Online……………………………………………………….. 5 Contact……………………………………………………… 6 Maps and Photographs …………..…………………….. 7 Pendle Collections Pendle Library Collection ………………………………… 12 Pilgrim & Badgery Collection …………………………… . 16 Parker of Browsholme and Alkincoats Collection ……… 18 The Honour of Clitheroe ………………………………… . 19 Wilfred Spencer Collection………………………………… 20 Selina Cooper Collection…………………………………… 21 Local Businesses and Organisations Societies……………………………………………. 22 Trade Unions ……………………………………… 22 Employers Associations …………………………. 24 Business records ………………………………… . 25 Smaller Collections …………………………………..….. 27 Official Records Local Government Lancashire County Council Societies ………....... 28 Colne Borough Council …………………………… 29 Nelson Borough Council ………………………….. 30 Barrowford Urban District Council ………………. 32 Barnoldswick Urban District Council …………….. 32 Earby Urban District Council……………………… 33 Trawden Urban District Council …………………. 34 2 Lancashire Record Office: What’s in it for Pendle ? Pendle Borough Council ……………………… 35 Parish Councils ………………………………… 35 Electoral registers ……………………………………… 36 Court Records Quarter Sessions ……………………………….. 44 Petty Sessions and Magistrates ………………. 46 County Court ……………………………………. 47 Coroners Courts ………………………………… 48 Probate Records …………………………………..…… 49 Education Records …………………………………….. 50 Hospital Records ……………………………………….. 56 Turnpike Trusts …………………………………...…… 57 Poor Law Union