DOCSLIB.ORG

Quiet Revolutionaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quiet Revolutionaries 31 REVOLUTIONARIES BY LISA SEYMOUR In nascent America, the small group of religious believers called Shakers began their own revolution of values, lifestyle, belief, and economics. Now a major exhibit illustrates their cultural endurance over nearly four centuries. n 1783, the justices of HANCOCK SHAKER VILLAGE, INC. expertise of the partner the town of Richmond, Quiet institutions to examine the Massachusetts, alarmed Shakers as not only producers about the activities of of highly collectible decorative IAnn Lee and her small but arts pieces, but as a complex growing group of followers society which, in seeking a known as “Shaking Quakers” utopia, redefined family, or Shakers, concluded that governance, gender roles, and “[t]hey appeared to be con- even productivity in ways that scientious, and acted upon countered or outright rejected religious principles; yet they the values of the newly formed deluded the people, and American nation. When slavery disturbed the inhabitants, and was common, Shakers at they must be taken care of, Watervliet may have assisted or they would turn the world some to escape; while the Age upside down.” of Jackson celebrated individ- The Shakers: America’s ual liberty, the Shakers praised Quiet Revolutionaries is a obedience to leadership; major exhibition, recently and during the Victorian era, opened at the New York State when women were idealized Museum in Albany, about the HANCOCK SHAKER VILLAGE, INC. United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing (the group’s formal name). A collaborative endeavor between the State Museum, the Shaker Museum | Mount Lebanon, Above: The family was the basic social and economic unit Hancock Shaker Village, and of the Shaker community, and members of families were the Shaker Heritage Society, sometimes, though not necessarily, biologically related. the exhibition draws upon Right: Shakers made an extraordinary variety of goods for the collections and curatorial sale to the world. www.nysarchivestrust.org 32 SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER MUSEUM SABBATHDAY Joseph Meacham and Lucy Wright established their central ministry at New Lebanon, New York in 1821. Many of the original buildings there still stand. suppose from their disaffection unit of the community, and to the American Cause that members of families were they mean to convey them to sometimes, though not nec- the Enemy...” British-born essarily, biologically related. founder Ann Lee, accused of The Lead Ministry at the New being a witch and spy, was met Lebanon community became SHAKER MUSEUM | MOUNT LEBANON with mobs and violence in the “center of union,” the many of the towns she seat of Shaker government visited in New England on and spiritual leadership. her missionary journeys from Meacham and Lucy Wright, 1781 until her death in 1784. whom Meacham elevated to Nonetheless, pockets of the title of Mother as his receptive listeners amassed. first act of leadership, sought In 1795, the Believers at New to unify the geographically Lebanon, New York signed dispersed and diverse body of and bound by convention, the Covenant of Joint Interest membership, as well as expand Shaker sisters managed and Union and embarked the reach of Shakerism into industries and economies. upon the great experiment in the American West. From the communal life that continues central ministry at New The Believers today at Sabbathday Lake, Lebanon, rules and regulations The fledgling religious group Maine, the last active Shaker pertaining to nearly every encountered rising political community. aspect of work and daily life and social tensions upon their Joseph Meacham, Ann Lee’s were issued with the goal of arrival in New York City in successor, devised and oversaw keeping all Believers in union, August of 1774 and their the gathering of communities which to them meant spiritu- subsequent move to Niskayuna, into “gospel order,” the hier- ally bonded: united to one outside Albany, in 1775. In archical structure that came to another, the Church, and to the summer of 1780, Shaker define Shaker life. Each village, God. Yet each Shaker village David Darrow and two others or community, was comprised developed a unique identity were discovered moving “a of several “families,” with two and followed the rules as the Number of Sheep.” They pairs of male and female family’s leaders saw fit. And were brought before New leaders overseeing both spiri- though women did not enjoy York State’s Commission for tual affairs (elders and eldresses) equality in the modern sense, Detecting and Defeating and temporal or business and the power held by Lucy Wright Conspiracies on July 7; the domestic affairs (deacons and and the leadership positions commission concluded that deaconesses). The family was held by generations of “there is the greatest reason to the basic social and economic eldresses and deaconesses NEW YORK archives • SUMMER 2015 33 SHAKER MUSEUM | MOUNT LEBANON HANCOCK SHAKER VILLAGE, INC. SHAKER MUSEUM | MOUNT LEBANON cleanliness they maintained in Above: Shakers were not Top: A six-tub clothes-washing machine, built and later patented by the living and working spaces, and immune to the fads of Shakers, attests to the size of a typical Shaker family. the practice of celibacy. Yet the world. Eldress Emma the communal lifestyle, which Neale was the subject of Bottom: All Shakers were expected to work in support of the community. allowed the sick, elderly, and a phrenology reading performed in 1880. stand in marked contrast to vegetables but also enjoyed infirm to work as much as the lives of their contempo- doughnuts, maple sugar cakes, they were able and ensured Below: Shaker design raries in the world. and popcorn balls. Though plentiful food, clothing, and relied upon the purest All Shakers, including members were urged to seek shelter to all who came into essence of form. members of the ministry, were medical care from practitioners the community, surely played a NEW YORK STATE MUSEUM expected to work in support within the community, Shaker significant role. Shaker life was of the community, but work medical practice did not differ intended to be heaven on earth, was not to be an excessive significantly from that of larger and so it may have seemed strain. A six-tub clothes-wash- society. For example, Eldress to those willing to sacrifice ing machine, built and later Emma Neale of the Mount personal independence. patented by the Shakers, Lebanon community was the attests to the size of the subject of a phrenology read- Beauty and Utility typical Shaker family, which ing performed in 1880 (phre- Shakers are perhaps best could consist of as many as nology is a pseudo-science in known for their 150 people, and to the which the contours of the design of ingenuity of Believers who skull are measured and inter- material strove to make their chores preted to reveal the subject’s objects, united less labor-intensive. Communal character), indicating that the by the qualities living also allowed the Shakers Shakers were not immune to of outstanding to consume a rich and varied the fads of the world. craftsmanship diet once the communities The Shakers enjoyed and composition were well established. They exceptional longevity. They of only fundamental grew and ate many fruits and attributed this to fresh air, the elements. Details like www.nysarchivestrust.org 34 the graceful shaping of the by peddler wagon and later cross members of a grading by mail-order catalogs and rake (used to smooth and stores operated within the level soil), or the elegant communities. SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETY SHAKER HERITAGE carving of a hat shaper, suggest that the beauty of Christians in Community these objects was the result The Shakers were distinct of the Shakers’ reliance upon from other Christian denomi- the purest essence of form. nations in that they believed A chrome-yellow lap desk in the dual nature of God as reveals that the Shakers a spirit that encompassed embraced brilliant colors and both male and female quali- that functionality was not ties. Moreover, they were the sole consideration in the Millennialists, though that creation of furniture or even does not mean they awaited utilitarian pieces. the world’s end. Instead they Indeed, Shakers made an believed that the second extraordinary variety of goods coming of Christ had already for sale to the world, informed occurred, and that Mother by their religious principles Ann Lee was the first to be NEW YORK STATE MUSEUM NEW YORK STATE and aided by the wealth of imbued with the Christ Spirit. resources that combined to The second coming, or millen- produce them. Shaker com- nium, was available to anyone munities used the wealth who lived according to the contributed by members to teachings of Mother Ann in acquire large land holdings. the Shaker Church. Each Shaker Agriculture was the foundation had to regularly confess his or for Shaker life and commercial her sins, practice celibacy, and enterprises, and communal place the community above life provided another advan- one’s self. While these beliefs tage: unlike many of their have not changed a great rural contemporaries, the deal over time, many religious Shakers could afford to engage practices have. Though the in experimental practices society was long known as and purchase or fabricate the the “Shaking Quakers,” they most modern and efficient are not, in fact, Quakers, though they share a common NEW YORK STATE MUSEUM NEW YORK STATE equipment. The Shakers long sustained their communities style of worship that does not by the production and sale of include sermons or ministers: garden seeds, medicinal herbs, each member may speak, or brooms, chairs, and “fancy give testimony, as the spirit goods” (objects made for sale moves him or her. Early in rather than their own use), their history they performed Above: Each Shaker village developed a unique identity and followed including satin-lined sewing uncontrolled, spiritually the rules as the family’s leaders saw fit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Me0330data.Pdf
    SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS ME-227 State Route 26, two miles south of the junction with State Route 122 HABS ME-227 New Gloucester vicinity Cumberland County Maine PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS No. ME-227 Location: State Route 26, two miles south of the junction with State Route 122 New Gloucester vicinity, Cumberland County, Maine The village is located on the east and west sides of State Route 26 Note: For shelving purposes at the Library of Congress, Cumberland County was selected as the main location for Sabbathday Lake Shaker Village. A portion of the village is also located in Androscoggin County. USGS Gray, Mechanic Falls, Minot, Raymond, Maine Quadrangles Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates (NAD83): NW 38711.37 4874057.31 NE 393479.37 487057.18 SE 393477.82 4868742.10 SW 387411.86 486742.35 Present Owner: The Shaker Society (The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing) Present Occupant: Members of the Shaker Society Present Use: Communal Shaker working village and museum Significance: This is the world’s only remaining active Shaker village community that reflects the evolution of Shaker religion and architecture from the late eighteenth century to the present. SABBATHDAY LAKE SHAKER VILLAGE HABS No. ME-227 (Page 2) PART I: HISTORICAL INFORMATION A. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1. Historical Development: The United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing at Sabbathday Lake, Maine is the world's only remaining active Shaker community.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ INAME HISTORIC Hancock Shaker Village__________________________________ AND/ORCOMMON Hancock Shaker Village STREET & NUMBER Lebanon Mountain Road ("U.S. Route 201 —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Hancock/Pittsfield _. VICINITY OF 1st STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Massachusetts 025 Berkshire 003 QCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT _PUBLIC -^OCCUPIED X_AGRICULTURE -XMUSEUM __BUILDING(S) X.RRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK _ STRUCTURE __BOTH XXWORK IN PROGRESS ^EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _JN PROCESS XXXYES . RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _ NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Shaker Community, Incorporated fprincipal owner) STREET& NUMBER P.O. Box 898 CITY. TOWN STATE Pittsfield VICINITY OF Mas s achus e 1.1. LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEoaETc. Berkshire County Registry of Deeds, Middle District STREETS NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Pittsfield Massachusetts REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey DATE 1931, 1959, 1945, 1960, 1962 ^FEDERAL _STATE _COUNTY ._LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Library of Congress, Division of Prints and Photographs CITY, TOWN STATE Washington DC DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE X_EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED .^ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD _RUINS XXALTERED - restored —MOVED DATE_______ _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Hancock Shaker Village is located on a 1,000-acre tract of land extending north and south of Lebanon Mountain Road (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Labor, Common Lives: the Social Construction of Work in Four Communal Societies, 1774-1932 Peter Andrew Hoehnle Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2003 Common labor, common lives: the social construction of work in four communal societies, 1774-1932 Peter Andrew Hoehnle Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hoehnle, Peter Andrew, "Common labor, common lives: the social construction of work in four communal societies, 1774-1932 " (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 719. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/719 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Common labor, common lives: The social construction of work in four communal societies, 1774-1932 by Peter Andrew Hoehnle A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Agricultural History and Rural Studies Program of Study Committee: Dorothy Schwieder, Major Professor Pamela Riney-Kehrberg Christopher M. Curtis Andrejs Plakans Michael Whiteford Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2003 © Copyright Peter Andrew Hoehnle, 2003. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 3118233 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustee's Building, Canterbury Shaker Village
    NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES State of New Hampshire, Department of Cultural Resources 603-271-3483 19 Pillsbury Street, 2 nd floor, Concord NH 03301-3570 603-271-3558 Voice/ TDD ACCESS: RELAY NH 1-800-735-2964 FAX 603-271-3433 http://www.nh.gov/nhdhr [email protected] REPORT ON THE TRUSTEES’ BUILDING CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE CANTERBURY, NEW HAMPSHIRE JAMES L. GARVIN 18 NOVEMBER 2001 Summary: The Trustees’ Building or office of the Church Family at Canterbury Shaker Village was the chief point of contact and commerce between the Church Family and the World. The building was the first and only brick structure built by the Church Family, and was constructed of materials of exceptional quality and workmanship. Built with fine bricks that were manufactured by the Shakers, the Trustees’ Building reveals much about the Shakers’ skill as brickmakers and as masons. The Trustees’ Building is a structure of statewide significance in the history of masonry construction in New Hampshire. Although built between 1830 and 1832, when the federal style was quickly waning and giving way to the Greek Revival in neighboring communities, the Trustees’ Building is stylistically conservative. Its interior detailing reflects the federal style, as modified and refined by the Shakers, more fully than any other structure at the village and perhaps more fully than any other Shaker building in New Hampshire. The structure therefore possesses stylistic significance as a document of the Shakers’ adoption and modification of an architectural style that was prevalent in the World. The building’s significance in technology, workmanship, and style would make the structure individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places if it were evaluated alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection, 1771-1933 FM.MS.S
    • THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ARCHIVES & RESEARCH CENTER Guide to Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection, 1771-1933 FM.MS.S.Coll.1 by Anne Mansella & Sarah Hayes August 2018 The processing of this collection was funded in part by Mass Humanities, which receives support from the Massachusetts Cultural Council and is an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities. Archives & Research Center 27 Everett Street, Sharon, MA 02067 www.thetrustees.org [email protected] 781-784-8200 The Trustees of Reservations – www.thetrustees.org Date Contents Box Folder/Item No. Extent: 15 boxes (includes 2 oversize boxes) Linear feet: 15 Copyright © 2018 The Trustees of Reservations ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION PROVENANCE Manuscript materials were first acquired by Clara Endicott Sears beginning in 1918 for her Fruitlands Museum in Harvard, Massachusetts. Materials continued to be collected by the museum throughout the 20th century. In 2016, Fruitlands Museum became The Trustees’ 116th reservation, and the Shaker manuscript materials were relocated to the Archives & Research Center in Sharon, Massachusetts. In Harvard, the Fruitlands Museum site continues to display the objects that Sears collected. The museum features three separate collections of significant Shaker, Native American, and American art and artifacts, as well as a historic farmhouse that was once home to the family of Louisa May Alcott and is recognized as a National Historic Landmark. OWNERSHIP & LITERARY RIGHTS The Fruitlands Shaker Manuscript Collection is the physical property of The Trustees of Reservations. Literary rights, including copyright, belong to the authors or their legal heirs and assigns. RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS This collection is open for research. Some items may be restricted due to handling condition of materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God
    American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 9 Number 1 Pages 3-39 January 2015 Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God Stephen J. Paterwic Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. Paterwic: Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God Voices That Heard and Accepted the Call of God By Stephen J. Paterwic A review of: Shaker Autobiographies, Biographies and Testimonies, 1806-1907, edited by Glendyne R. Wergland and Christian Goodwillie. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2014. 3 volume set. Let the Shakers Speak for Themselves In 1824 teenager Mary Antoinette Doolittle felt drawn to the Shakers and sought every opportunity to obtain information about them. By chance, while visiting her grandmother, she encountered two young women who had just left the New Lebanon community. “Mary” was thrilled with the opportunity to hear them tell their story.1 Suddenly “something like a voice” said to her, “Why listen to them? Go to the Shakers, visit, see and learn for yourself who and what they are!”2 This idea is echoed in the testimony of Thomas Stebbins of Enfield, Connecticut, who was not satisfied to hear about the Shakers. “But I had a feeling to go and see them, and judge for myself.” (1:400) Almost two hundred years later, this is still the best advice for people seeking to learn about the Shakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation for a Group Trip to Hancock Shaker Village Before Your Visit Lay a Foundation So That the Youngs
    Preparation for a Group Trip to Hancock Shaker Village Before your visit Lay a foundation so that the youngsters know why they are going on this trip. Talk about things for the students to look for and questions that you hope to answer at the Village. Remember that the outdoor experiences at the Village can be as memorable an indoor ones. Information to help you is included in this package, and more is available on­line at www.hancockshakervillage.org. Plan to divide into small groups, and decide if specific focus topics will be assigned. Perhaps a treasure hunt for things related to a focus topic can make the experience more meaningful. Please review general museum etiquette with your class BEFORE your visit and ON the bus: • Please organize your class into small groups of 5­10 students per adult chaperone. • Students must stay with their chaperones at all times, and chaperones must stay with their assigned groups. • Please walk when inside buildings and use “inside voices.” • Listen respectfully when an interpreter is speaking. • Be respectful and courteous to other visitors. • Food or beverages are not allowed in the historic buildings. • No flash photography is allowed inside the historic buildings. • Be ready to take advantage of a variety of hands­on and minds­on experiences! Arrival Procedure A staff member will greet your group at the designated Drop Off and Pick Up area – clearly marked by signs on our entry driveway and located adjacent to the parking lot and the Visitor Center. We will escort your group to the Picnic Area, which has rest rooms and both indoor and outdoor picnic tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide I Bound Manuscripts
    VOLUME I GUIDE TO BOUND SHAKER MANUSCRIPTS IN THE LIBRARY COLLECTION OF HANCOCK SHAKER VILLAGE Pittsfield, Massachusetts, 2001 Compiled and annotated by Dr. Magda Gabor-Hotchkiss Retired Coordinator of Library Collections Copyright © 2001 Hancock Shaker Village, Inc. CONTENTS PREPARER’S NOTE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ORIGINAL BOUND MANUSCRIPTS ALFRED 2 ENFIELD, CT 2 GROVELAND, NY 3 HANCOCK, MA 3 HARVARD, MA 6 MOUNT LEBANON, NY 8 TYRINGHAM, MA 20 UNION VILLAGE, OH 21 UNKNOWN COMMUNITIES 21 COPIED BOUND MANUSCRIPTS CANTERBURY, NH 23 ENFIELD, CT 24 HANCOCK, MA 24 HARVARD, MA 26 MOUNT LEBANON, NY 27 NORTH UNION, OH 30 PLEASANT HILL, KY 31 SOUTH UNION, KY 32 WATERVLIET, NY 33 UNKNOWN COMMUNITY 34 MISCELLANEOUS 35 PREPARER'S NOTE: THE BOUND SHAKER MANUSCRIPTS A set of most remarkable documents, handwritten by the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing, more commonly called the Shakers, was produced by their leaders, Elders of their Central (Lead), Bishopric, and Family Ministries; their Deacons, in charge of production of an endless variety of goods; their Trustees, in charge of their financial affairs. Thus these manuscripts - Ministerial and Family journals, yearbooks, diaries, Covenants, hymnals, are invaluable documents illuminating the concepts and views of Shakers on their religion, theology, music, spiritual life and visions, and their concerns and activities in community organization, membership, daily events, production of goods, financial transactions between Shaker societies and the outside world, their crafts and industries. For information pertaining to specific communities and Shaker individuals, only reference works that were most frequently used are listed: Index of Hancock Shakers - Biographical References, by Priscilla Brewer; Shaker Cities of Peace, Love, and Union: A History of the Hancock Bishopric, by Deborah E.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Summary Selected Search Terms
    Collection Summary ID Number: CS 657 Title: Shakers Extent: 33 Folder(s), 1 Media Item, 4 Map Case Items Span Dates: 1803-2013 Language: English Geographic Location: Various Abstract: This collection consists of newsletters, newspapers, publications, articles, events and museum news from several Shaker communities and historic sites. It also contains the Roger Hall/Shaker Music collection which consists of booklets and recordings of Shaker Music and interviews from 2004 to 2011. Photographs of the communities can be found at: http://digitalarchives.usi.edu/digital/collection/CSIC/search/searchterm/shakers Selected Search Terms Subjects: Communal living; Collective settlements; Housing, Cooperative; Collective farms; Commune; Utopian socialism; Christian life; Christian ethics; Christian stewardship; Shakers; Shakers—Hymns; Sacred music Historical Notes: No other communal group in the United States has endured as long as the United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing, popular known as Shakers, and few have been better known. The Shakers were founded in England; the early members journeyed to colonial America in 1774 under the leadership of Ann Lee and began to develop structured communal life soon thereafter in a first colony at Niskeyuna (later called Watervliet), New York. Shakers lived sober and celibate lives that followed strict rules, including stringent separation of the sexes. For many years they suffered derision and active opposition from detractors—who accused the leaders of exploiting their rank and file members and ridiculed the Shakers for believing that Ann Lee represented Christ in the Second Coming—but eventually positive images displaced the negative ones. The Shakers became known for their vibrant worship services that featured dance-like rituals known as “laboring,” as well as for their fine agricultural products, their simple but elegant architecture and exquisite furniture, and their placement of women in leadership roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith
    American Communal Societies Quarterly Volume 5 Number 3 Pages 11-137 July 2011 Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith Galen Beale Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/acsq Part of the American Studies Commons This work is made available by Hamilton College for educational and research purposes under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For more information, visit http://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/about.html or contact [email protected]. Beale: Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith Peter Ayers, Defender of the Faith By Galen Beale And as she turned and looked at an apple tree in full bloom, she exclaimed: — How beautiful this tree looks now! But some of the apples will soon fall off; some will hold on longer; some will hold on till they are half grown and will then fall off; and some will get ripe. So it is with souls that set out in the way of God. Many set out very fair and soon fall away; some will go further, and then fall off, some will go still further and then fall; and some will go through.1 New England was a hotbed of discontent in the second half of the eighteenth century. Both civil and religious events stirred its citizenry to action. Europeans wished to govern this new, resource-rich country, causing continual fighting, and new religions were springing up in reaction to the times. The French and Indian War had aligned the British with the colonists, but that alliance soon dissolved as the British tried to extract from its colonists the cost of protecting them.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Live Auction Preview
    2021 LIVE AUCTION PREVIEW Hancock Shaker Village Can’t make the gala on August 14 but want to bid and support the cause? You can place an absentee bid by filling out this form, emailing us here or calling us 413.443.0188, x203. All pre-gala bids must be received by 10am on Saturday, August 14. 1. SHAKER LITHOGRAPH, 1988 John Stritch Signed and numbered 16/100, framed, 25” x 35” John Stritch was a well-known steel abstract expressionist, poster designer and print maker. Born in 1925, Dr. Stritch began his career as a flight surgeon during World War II, and eventually moved to Hinsdale to take up painting and sculpting full-time. He taught students from the Pittsfield Public Schools to the DeSisto School, where he was also the school doctor. Prolific, he designed beautiful poster and serigraphs that recorded the visual beauty of Berkshire cultural icons, most notably and often for Tanglewood, and the posters have become highly collectible following his passing in 2014. Stritch prints were meticulously hand-pulled using a silkscreen on large format heavyweight cotton rag paper, featuring an exquisite blending of color that evinces a sense of precision. What could be more iconic than a Shaker revolving chair? His work is in the collections of the Berkshire Museum, Williams College Museum of Art, and other institutions. Estimated value: $1,000 2. GIFT DRAWING, 2021 Allison Smith Letterpress print with watercolor overlay, signed, limited edition, unframed, 15” x 20” Just north of Hancock Shaker Village is the Shaker Trail, a hike to Mount Sinai.
    [Show full text]
  • NBMAA Anything but Simple Press Release
    The New Britain Museum of American Art Presents Anything but Simple: Shaker Gift Drawings and the Women Who Made Them August 6, 2020-January 10, 2021 NEW BRITAIN, CONN., August 3, 2020, As a part of the 2020/20+ Women @ NBMAA initiative, The New Britain Museum of American Art (NBMAA) is thrilled to present Anything but Simple: Shaker Gift Drawings and the Women Who Made Them, August 6, 2020 through January 10, 2021. Organized by Hancock Shaker Village, Pittsfield, MA, Anything but Simple features rare Shaker “gift” or “spirit” drawings created by Shaker women in the mid-1800s, a period known as the Era of Manifestations. During that time, members of Shaker society created dances, songs, and drawings inspired by spiritual revelations or supernatural “gifts.” Colorful, decorative, and complex, “gift” drawings expressed messages of love, dedication to Shaker belief, and the promise of heaven following the earthly journey. Anything but Simple presents 25 of the 200 gift drawings extant in public and private collections today. This group of drawings, made between 1843 and 1857, is widely considered one of the world’s finest collections and includes the most famous gift drawing in existence: Hannah Cohoon’s 1854 Tree of Life. The Shaker Soul The drawings were made by young Shaker women dubbed “instruments” by their elders due to the fact that the women claimed they received these images as gifts from the spirit world. It is perhaps not surprising that a religion founded by a woman should find significant spiritual messages coming from women, even a century before women won the right to vote in the United States.
    [Show full text]