Artificial Incubation of Eggs of Various Bird Species And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Artificial Incubation of Eggs of Various Bird Species And Vol. XXXII 1961 WETHERBEE,D. K. AND N. S.,•4rtificial Egg lncubatio• [141 HOLLOM, P. A.D., and H. G. BROWNLOW.1955. Trapping methods for bird ringers. (Rev. edition) British Trust/or Ornithology,Field Guide No. 1, 56 pp. HUSSELL,D. J. T., and JAMESWOODFORD. 1961. The use of ,a Heligoland trap and mist-nets at Long Poin,t, Ontario. (in •his issue) LINCOLN,F. C., and S. P. BALDWIN. 1929. ,Mant•al for bird banders.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Misc. Publ. No. 58; 1-112. LO.CKLEY,R. M., and R. RUSSELL. 1953. Bird-Ringing. Crosby, Lockwood and son. M[ACKINTOSH,J.R. 1956. Planting your garden for wild hirds. Audubon Society of Canada, Toronto. _MATHER,J. R. 1960. An alternative to the sleeve nsed on catching boxes. The Ringers' Bulletin, 1 (8): [10-11, unpaged]. SPENCER,ROBERT. 1959. Progressand prospectsin ringing. Ibis, 101: 416-424. TEBBES,JOHN K. 1953. Songbirds in your garden. Cromwell. WEIGOLD,HUGO. 1956. How we began ringing on Heligoland. The Ring, 8: 159-162. [_WHITTLE,CHARLE• L.] C.L.W. 1930. I"Der Vogelzug," a new ornkhological journal.] Review in Bird-Banding, 1: 83. WILLIAMSON,KENNETH. 1957. Mist-nets versus,Heligoland traps. B[rd-Band•'ng, 28: 213-222. WOODFORD,J. 1959. The use of mist-netsand a Heligol,and trap at Point Pelee. Bird-Banding, 30: 38-46. Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Qaeen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: 17 Farns- worth Drive, Weston, Ontario, Ca,ada. Received February, 1961 ARTIFICIAL INCUBATION OF E'GGS OF VARIOUS BIRD SPECIES AND SOME ATTRIBUTES OF NEONATES By DAVIDKENNETH WETHERBEE and NANCYS. WETHERBEE Introduction. In connectionwith a study of the morphology of just-hatchedbirds we have accumulatedcollateral data that may be of somegeneral value to ornithologists.More than 2,000 specimensof 83 specieswere hatched in incubators. No speciestried in adequate samplesfailed to be amenableto artificial incubation. Incubation data determinedin the laboratory where conditionscan be standardizedare basicto an understandingof the biologicalproblems of natural incuba- tion studiedby ecologists. Evans (1891 and 1892) in Scotlandand Heinroth (1908 and 1922) in Germanyfirst and mostextensively hatched out Old World species. Baldwinand Kendeigh(1932), Kendeigh(1940), and Graber i1955'• investigatedartificial incubationof wild birds' eggs in America. Presentmanuscript was completed in 1957. Acknowledgments. Grateful acknowledgmentis made to the many peoplewho helpedsearch for nests. Dr. Kay T. Rogersen- couragedthe useof artificial incubationin 1951 when sciencefounda- tionsspurned the practicality of arti'ficialincubat4on of wild birds'eggs. Bird-Banding 142] WETHERBEE,D. K. aN,• N. S..Arti/•cial Egg lacub,tio,, stay Dr. Richard Graber kindly contributedseveral speciinenshatched in his incubator. Incubators were made available by Dr. Rudolph F. Nunnemacherat Worcester, Massachusetts,Dr. Bradley M. Patten at Ann Arbor, Michigan,Dr. Hugh Clark at Storrs,Connecticut, and the late Dr. Charles S. Johnson at Nashville, Tennessee. Dr. Oliver L. Austin, Jr. and otherskindly mademany suggestionsthat were adopted in improving the manuscript; responsibilityfor the accuracy and organizationof the final draft howeveris entirely our own. Methods. All the eggsof each clutch found were collected,whether or not the clutch was complete. Date, time, locality, number of eggs in the clutch,degree of certaintyof speciesidentification, and data on the incubationattendance of the parent were recorded. A separatedata sheetfor eachegg was kept. At the incubatora clutch-and egg-number was brushedon each egg. The length of time and conditionsof trans- potration from the field were recorded. Each egg was measured or weighed,put in waterto determinebuoyancy, and candiedbefore being pu,t into the incubator. Efforts were made over the 6-year period to obtainas manyeggs as possible. Artificial incubationwas aimed at 37.8øC. and 64 percent relative humidi,ty.Most of the eggswere incubatedin forced draft, 600-chicken- egg capacity,American-Lincoln cabinets. The eggs,rolled twice daily, were held in open, partitioned petri dishes lined with gauze. To determinevolumes, most of the eggs were weigheddaily until they reachedspecific gravity of unity as determinedby buoyancyin waterat 37øC. At this point egg weightsin gramsequal their volumesin cubic centimeters.The comparisonof volumesis more significantthan com- parison of weights of fresh eggs (or at least is more amenable to standardization)because for practicalpurposes there is no suchthing as a "fresh egg" in nature. Balancescould be read to at least four digits and were sensitiveto at least ,threedecimal places. Thin-shelled eggs,such as those of swallows,were dried completely by blottersbefore being returned to the incubator. When volumeswere not determinedin the mannerjust describedmost other eggswere measuredto greattest length and width by vernier calipers. Infertile and addled eggswere discardedas soon as detected. Dead embryoswere examined for anomalies.The timesof first peepingfrom the egg and of the first pipping of the shell were noted. Efforts were madeto preservethe hatchlingat, or as near the momentof, hatching as possible,as this was critical to the centralstudy (Wetherbee,1959). This time was recordedas plus or minus the nearesthour, one-half the interim betweenincubator tendings. The partitionsof the petri dishes isolated each "altricial" chick and its numbered shell from other hatchings;with "precocial"(in the strictornithological sense) species eachegg was individuallybagged. Each chick was weighed,described as to behavior,color of skin, mouth-liningand down,and often comparedto other specieshatched simultaneously.Each chick was labelled,tied in a gauzebag, and preservedin 10 percentneutral formalin or 75 percentethyl alcohol. Specimenswere la,ter transferredto 95 percentalcohol in individual snap-capvials. The shellswere collected and put into dry storagefor referencein caseof curatorialerrors. This work attemptsto establish Vol. 1961XXXlI WETHERBEE,D. K. AND N. S.,•4rtiy•cial Egg Inc,batior, [143 a standard for data on incubation under standardized conditions. Such measurementsmay allow for more accurateand more significan,tinter- specificcomparisons, for there should be (ideallyl very little intra- specificvariation. Embryologicaldevelopment and incubationperiods in the wild, however,vary greatly as parental attentiveness,environ- mental temperature,moisture, etc. are conditionswhich cannot be measuredaccurately. Definitions of terms. Incubation period is defined as the longest time it takesany egg of the givenspecies to hatch spontaneouslyunder artificial incubationin forced air incubatoraimed at 37.8øC., 64 percent relative humidity. Such standardizationis necessary,because, as every commercialhatcher knows, embryologicaldevelopment is sensitiveto slightdifferences in temperatureor humidity (Huggins,1941). Ideally, experimentalwork may some day establishthe optimum temperature for incubationof each species(Baldwin and Kendeigh, 1932, and Graber, 1955). Incubation periodsgiven here are the longestthat we recordedand are not necessarilyentire maximum potential incubation periods,though most are probably representative.Incubation period data were not usedwhen the chick required aid in emergingfrom the shell. Egg clutchesof larger specieshad greater variability in total emergencethan egg clutchesof smaller species. Mortality statistics for artificial incubationhave no bearing on incubationmortality rate in the wild. The expression of temperature in O.IøC. rather than 1.øF. is advocatedin the interestsof establishinga standard of high critical rigor sorelyneeded for comparativepurposes in this type of ornithologi- cal work. We have purposelyexpressed time duration in hours rather than days-and-hours. We believe that the sad state in which the literatureof incubationfinds itself can be rectifiedif ornithologists;viii use consistentlythe primary units of temporal embryology--hours. Even when we made a conscious effort to record to the neares,t hour we often came up with a hatchingtime "plus or minus 10 hr."; we can't help but wonder what the margins of error are in statementsin the literaturerecorded and expressedin days. What is worse,ornithologists often get confusedas to whetheror not to count.the first day; or they limit the meaningof day to calendar day; or they record incubation time in days and estimatedfractions, then later convert to hours. Interim betweenhatchi•gs. As eggsmay undergosome development in the nest due to variable, warm environmentaltemperature, even thoughthe eggsare not incubatedby the parent, the interim between hatching used as an indication of the relative time of the onset of parental incubationis of most value when expressedas the minimum interim observedin severalcomplete clutches all of which hatch, rather than as the maximum interim. Clutch weight. Clutch weights were reported only from actual clutchesknown to be completeby virtue of a hatchingtime in the incubator considerablyless .than known incubationperiods. These data should be distinguishedfrom clutch weights determinedfrom calculationsand extrapolations. Weights.Averages were determined from segregatedclutch averages, Bird-Banding ]44] W•:T•:I•:•:,D. K. a•I) N. S.,Arti]•cia[ Egg Incubation not arithmetic summation of individuals, unlessotherwise stated in the text. Neonatalweights were taken of specimensthat had just dried, after beingtaken directly from the constanthumidity of the incubator. Many chickswere observed,to defecateafter hatching: this probably accountsfor most disparities between
Recommended publications
  • Incubating and Hatching Eggs
    EPS-001 7/13 Incubating and Hatching Eggs Gregory S. Archer and A. Lee Cartwright* hether eggs come from a common chicken Factors that affect hatchability or an exotic bird, you must store and incu- W Breeder Hatchery bate them carefully for a successful hatch. Envi- Breeder nutrition Sanitation ronmental conditions, handling, sanitation, and Disease Egg storage record keeping are all important factors when it Mating activity Egg damage comes to incubating and hatching eggs. Egg damage Incubation—Management of Correct male and female setters and hatchers Fertile egg quality body weight Chick handling A fertile egg is alive; each egg contains living cells Egg sanitation that can become a viable embryo and then a chick. Egg storage Eggs are fragile and a successful hatch begins with undamaged eggs that are fresh, clean, and fertile. Collecting and storing fertile eggs You can produce fertile eggs yourself or obtain Fertile eggs must be collected carefully and stored them elsewhere. While commercial hatcheries properly until they are incubated. Keeping the produce quality eggs that are highly fertile, many eggs at proper storage temperatures keeps the do not ship small quantities. If you mail order embryo from starting and stopping development, eggs, be sure to pick them up promptly from your which increases embryo mortality. Collecting receiving area. Hatchability will decrease if eggs eggs frequently and storing them properly delays are handled poorly or get too hot or too cold in embryo development until you are ready to incu- transit. bate them. If you produce the eggs on site, you must care for the breeding stock properly to ensure maximum Egg storage reminders fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Egg Density and Egg Mass Techniques for Incubation Stage Assessment to Predict Hatch Dates of Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus Ruber Roseus Eggs
    131 Using egg density and egg mass techniques for incubation stage assessment to predict hatch dates of Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber roseus eggs N. Jarrett1, V. Mason1, L. Wright2 & V. Levassor1 'The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK. Email: nigel. jarrett0w w t. org. uk Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK. Egg density and the egg mass techniques for incubation stage assess­ ment were developed to predict the hatch dates of Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber roseus eggs laid in captivity at WWT, Slimbridge, UK. The accuracy of each technique was tested on 20 parentally incubat­ ed eggs by comparing actual hatch date with predicted hatch date. For the egg mass technique a strong positive correlation existed between actual and predicted fresh mass, suggesting that model accuracy was high. Both techniques predicted hatch dates within two days 80% of the time. These techniques were found to be useful for accurate incubation stage assessment of Greater Flamingo eggs and the authors encourage aviculturalists managing captive colonies to use them. Key Words: egg mass, egg density, incubation stage assessment, Greater Flamingo, Phoenicopterus ruber roseus Each year at The Wildfowl and shallowly flooded islands. Single eggs Wetlands Trust (WWT), Slimbridge, UK, are laid on these nest mounds, and up to 60 pairs of colonially breeding cap­ nest-defence duties are shared by both tive Greater Flamingos Phoenicopterus sexes until a chick is hatched after 26- ruber roseus compete for nest sites. 32 days' incubation. Fighting between Breeding pairs usually construct nest nest mound occupants and their neigh­ mounds, often up to 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury and Selenium Contamination in Waterbird Eggs and Risk to Avian Reproduction at Great Salt Lake, Utah
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mercury and Selenium Contamination in Waterbird Eggs and Risk to Avian Reproduction at Great Salt Lake, Utah Open-File Report 2015–1020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Franklin’s gulls nesting at Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, Great Salt Lake, Utah. Photograph taken by Josh Ackerman in 2012. Mercury and Selenium Contamination in Waterbird Eggs and Risk to Avian Reproduction at Great Salt Lake, Utah By Joshua T. Ackerman, Mark P. Herzog, C. Alex Hartman, John Isanhart, Garth Herring, Sharon Vaughn, John F. Cavitt, Collin A. Eagles-Smith, Howard Browers, Chris Cline, and Josh Vest Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report 2015–1020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryonic Exposure to Oestrogen Causes Eggshell Thinning and Altered Shell Gland Carbonic Anhydrase Expression in the Domestic Hen
    REPRODUCTIONRESEARCH Embryonic exposure to oestrogen causes eggshell thinning and altered shell gland carbonic anhydrase expression in the domestic hen C Berg, A Blomqvist1, L Holm1, I Brandt, B Brunstro¨m and Y Ridderstra˚le1 Department of Environmental Toxicology, Uppsala University, Norbyva¨gen 18 A, 753 36 Uppsala, Sweden and 1Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7045, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Correspondence should be addressed to C Berg; Email: [email protected] Abstract Eggshell thinning among wild birds has been an environmental concern for almost half a century. Although the mechanisms for contaminant-induced eggshell thinning are not fully understood, it is generally conceived to originate from exposure of the laying adult female. Here we show that eggshell thinning in the domestic hen is induced by embryonic exposure to the syn- thetic oestrogen ethynyloestradiol. Previously we reported that exposure of quail embryos to ethynyloestradiol caused histo- logical changes and disrupted localization of carbonic anhydrase in the shell gland in the adult birds, implying a functional disturbance in the shell gland. The objective of this study was to examine whether in ovo exposure to ethynyloestradiol can affect eggshell formation and quality in the domestic hen. When examined at 32 weeks of age, hens exposed to ethynyloestra- diol in ovo (20 ng/g egg) produced eggs with thinner eggshells and reduced strength (measured as resistance to deformation) compared with the controls. These changes remained 14 weeks later, confirming a persistent lesion. Ethynyloestradiol also caused a decrease in the number of shell gland capillaries and in the frequency of shell gland capillaries with carbonic anhy- drase activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the White-Rumped Shama on Oahu, Hawaii
    Wilson Bull., 106(2), 1994, pp. 3 11-328 BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE WHITE-RUMPED SHAMA ON OAHU, HAWAII CELESTINO FLORES AGUON’ AND SHEILA CONANT* ABSTRACT.-WC studied the breeding biology of the White-rumped Shama (Copsychus malabaricus) on Oahu, Hawaii, during 1986-1987. This species is sexually dichromatic and sexually dimorphic, with males being larger. It forms monogamous pair bonds that may last two breeding seasons. The breeding season was from March through August, and territories of nesting pairs that were provided nest boxes averaged 0.09 ha in size. Only three- and four-egg clutches were observed, with four eggs being the modal clutch size. The incubation period averaged 13.6 days and the nestling period averaged 12.4 days. Both adults fed young but only the female incubated and brooded. Shamas can raise two broods in one breeding season, and reproductive success for double-brooded pairs was higher (91%) than that for single-brooded pairs (62%). Received 4 Jun. 1993, accepted 15 Sept. 1993. More species of birds have been introduced to Hawaii than to any other place (Long 1981). Caum (1933) reported that 96 bird species had been introduced in Hawaii, and Bryan (1958) reported 94 introduced species. The number of accidental or intentional introductions is now estimated at 178 (Berger 1981). Little is known about the biology of most of these species, and many were introduced without prior knowledge of their ecol- ogy or their potential for impact on Hawaiian ecosystems. The White-rumped Shama (Muscicapidae: Turdinae: Copsychus mal- abaricus), introduced to Kauai in 193 1 by Alexander Isenberger, is native to South Asia, where there are four known subspecies: Copsychus m.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumption of Bird Eggs by Invasive
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES IRCF& AMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 19(1):64–66189 • MARCH 2012 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCED SPECIES FEATURE ARTICLES . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared HistoryConsumption of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on ofGrenada: Bird Eggs A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 byRESEARCH Invasive ARTICLES Burmese Pythons in Florida . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 1 2 3 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestrisCarla) inJ. Florida Dove , Robert N. Reed , and Ray W. Snow .............................................Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 1 SmithsonianCONSERVATION Institution, Division ALERT of Birds, NHB E-600, MRC 116, Washington, District of Columbia 20560, USA ([email protected]) 2U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, 2150 Centre Ave, Bldg C, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, USA ([email protected]) . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Fertilization and Egg Incubation Techniques
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Technical Manual for Artificial Propagation of the Indonesian Catfish, Pangasius djambal provided by Horizon / Pleins textes Editors: Jacques Slembrouck, Oman Komarudin, Maskur, Marc Legendre © IRD-DKP 2003, ISBN: 979-8186-92-3 Chapter V Artificial Fertilization and Egg Incubation Techniques Slembrouck J.(a, e), J. Subagja(b), D. Day(c), Firdausi(d) and M. Legendre(e) (a) IRD (Institut de recherche pour le développement), Wisma Anugraha, Jl. Taman Kemang Selatan No. 32B, 12730 Jakarta, Indonesia. (b) RIFA (Research Institute for Freshwater Aquaculture), Jl. Sempur No. 1, PO. Box 150 Bogor, Indonesia. (c) JFADC (Jambi Freshwater Aquaculture Development Centre), Jl. Jenderal Sudirman No. 16C, The Hok, Jambi Selatan, Jambi, Sumatera, Indonesia. (d) Loka BAT Mandiangin (Lokasi Budidaya Air Tawar Mandiangin), Jl. Tahura Sultan Adam, Mandiangin, Kabupaten Banjar 70661, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia. (e) IRD/GAMET (Groupe aquaculture continentale méditerranéenne et tropicale), BP 5095, 34033 Montpellier cedex 1, France. Chapter V The artificial fertilization technique used for P. djambal is the dry method, i.e. the sperm is first spread over and mixed manually with collected ova. To increase the fertilization rate it is recommended to divide collected ova in small batches of 100 – 200 g (100 – 200 mL) in plastic bowls. For fertilization, 5 mL of diluted sperm are poured over one 100-g (100 mL) batch of ova, then mixed delicately with a feather until the sperm is homogenously spread in the ova mass (Plate V.1). Spermatozoa activation is triggered by addition of freshwater. The ratio generally used is 1 volume of freshwater for 1 volume of ova.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Incubation Periods Directly Determined from Growth-Line Counts in Embryonic Teeth Show Reptilian-Grade Development
    Dinosaur incubation periods directly determined from growth-line counts in embryonic teeth show reptilian-grade development Gregory M. Ericksona,1, Darla K. Zelenitskyb, David Ian Kaya, and Mark A. Norellc aDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295; bDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4; and cDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024 Edited by Neil H. Shubin, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved December 1, 2016 (received for review August 17, 2016) Birds stand out from other egg-laying amniotes by producing anatomical, behavioral and eggshell attributes of birds related to relatively small numbers of large eggs with very short incubation reproduction [e.g., medullary bone (32), brooding (33–36), egg- periods (average 11–85 d). This aspect promotes high survivorship shell with multiple structural layers (37, 38), pigmented eggs (39), by limiting exposure to predation and environmental perturba- asymmetric eggs (19, 40, 41), and monoautochronic egg pro- tion, allows for larger more fit young, and facilitates rapid attain- duction (19, 40)] trace back to their dinosaurian ancestry (42). For ment of adult size. Birds are living dinosaurs; their rapid development such reasons, rapid avian incubation has generally been assumed has been considered to reflect the primitive dinosaurian condition. throughout Dinosauria (43–45). Here, nonavian dinosaurian incubation periods in both small and Incubation period estimates using regressions of typical avian large ornithischian taxa are empirically determined through growth- values relative to egg mass range from 45 to 80 d across the line counts in embryonic teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Eggshell Colour Gamut: Uroerythrin and Bilirubin from Tinamou (Tinamidae) Eggshells Randy Hamchand1, Daniel Hanley2, Richard O
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Expanding the eggshell colour gamut: uroerythrin and bilirubin from tinamou (Tinamidae) eggshells Randy Hamchand1, Daniel Hanley2, Richard O. Prum3 & Christian Brückner1* To date, only two pigments have been identifed in avian eggshells: rusty-brown protoporphyrin IX and blue-green biliverdin IXα. Most avian eggshell colours can be produced by a mixture of these two tetrapyrrolic pigments. However, tinamou (Tinamidae) eggshells display colours not easily rationalised by combination of these two pigments alone, suggesting the presence of other pigments. Here, through extraction, derivatization, spectroscopy, chromatography, and mass spectrometry, we identify two novel eggshell pigments: yellow–brown tetrapyrrolic bilirubin from the guacamole- green eggshells of Eudromia elegans, and red–orange tripyrrolic uroerythrin from the purplish-brown eggshells of Nothura maculosa. Both pigments are known porphyrin catabolites and are found in the eggshells in conjunction with biliverdin IXα. A colour mixing model using the new pigments and biliverdin reproduces the respective eggshell colours. These discoveries expand our understanding of how eggshell colour diversity is achieved. We suggest that the ability of these pigments to photo- degrade may have an adaptive value for the tinamous. Birds’ eggs are found in an expansive variety of shapes, sizes, and colourings 1. Te diverse array of appearances found across Aves is achieved—in large part—through a combination of structural features, solid or patterned colorations, the use of two diferent dyes, and diferential pigment deposition. Eggshell pigments are embedded within the white calcium carbonate matrix of the egg and within a thin outer proteinaceous layer called the cuticle2–4. Tese pigments are believed to play a key role in crypsis5,6, although other, possibly dynamic 7,8, roles in inter- and intra-species signalling5,9–12 are also possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature, Nest Humidity, and Behavioral Thermoregulation in a Hot Environment
    (ISBN: 0-943610-30-3) AVIAN INCUBATION: EGG TEMPERATURE, NEST HUMIDITY, AND BEHAVIORAL THERMOREGULATION IN A HOT ENVIRONMENT BY GILBERT S. GRANT Departmentof Biology,University of California, Los Angeles ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 30 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION WASHINGTON, D.C. 1982 AVIAN INCUBATION: EGG TEMPERATURE, NEST HUMIDITY, AND BEHAVIORAL THERMOREGULATION IN A HOT ENVIRONMENT ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS This series, publishedby the American Ornithologists'Union, has been estab- lished for major paperstoo long for inclusionin the Union's journal, The Auk. Publicationhas been made possible through the generosity of thelate Mrs. Carll Tucker and the Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation, Inc. Correspondenceconcerning manuscriptsfor publication in the series should be addressedto the Editor, Dr. Mercedes S. Foster, USFWS, NHB-378, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560. Copies of Ornithological Monographs may be ordered from the Assistant to the Treasurer of the AOU, Glen E. Woolfenden, Department of Biology, Uni- versity of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620. (See price list on back and in- side back cover.) Ornithological Monographs, No. 30, ix + 75 pp. Editor of AOU Monographs, Mercedes S. Foster Special Reviewers for this issue, Cynthia Carey, Department of Environ- mental, Population, and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado; Donald F. Hoyt, Department of Biological Sci- ences,California State PolytechnicUniversity, Pomona, California; S. Charles Kendeigh, Department
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation in Avian Incubation Periods and Parental Influences on Embryonic Temperature
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00204.x GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN AVIAN INCUBATION PERIODS AND PARENTAL INFLUENCES ON EMBRYONIC TEMPERATURE Thomas E. Martin,1,2 Sonya K. Auer,1,3,4 Ronald D. Bassar,1,3,5 Alina M. Niklison,1,6 and Penn Lloyd1,7 1United States Geological Survey Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812 2E-mail: [email protected] 4E-mail: [email protected] 5E-mail: [email protected] 6E-mail: [email protected] 7Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] Received March 1, 2007 Accepted June 13, 2007 Theory predicts shorter embryonic periods in species with greater embryo mortality risk and smaller body size. Field studies of 80 passerine species on three continents yielded data that largely conflicted with theory; incubation (embryonic) periods were longer rather than shorter in smaller species, and egg (embryo) mortality risk explained some variation within regions, but did not explain larger differences in incubation periods among geographic regions. Incubation behavior of parents seems to explain these discrepancies. Bird embryos are effectively ectothermic and depend on warmth provided by parents sitting on the eggs to attain proper temperatures for development. Parents of smaller species, plus tropical and southern hemisphere species, commonly exhibited lower nest attentiveness (percent of time spent on the nest incubating) than larger and northern hemisphere species. Lower nest attentiveness produced cooler minimum and average embryonic temperatures that were correlated with longer incu- bation periods independent of nest predation risk or body size.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds and Mammals)
    6-3.1 Compare the characteristic structures of invertebrate animals... and vertebrate animals (...birds and mammals). Also covers: 6-1.1, 6-1.2, 6-1.5, 6-3.2, 6-3.3 Birds and Mammals sections More Alike than Not! Birds and mammals have adaptations that 1 Birds allow them to live on every continent and in 2 Mammals every ocean. Some of these animals have Lab Mammal Footprints adapted to withstand the coldest or hottest Lab Bird Counts conditions. These adaptations help to make Virtual Lab How are birds these animal groups successful. adapted to their habitat? Science Journal List similar characteristics of a mammal and a bird. What characteristics are different? 254 Theo Allofs/CORBIS Start-Up Activities Birds and Mammals Make the following Foldable to help you organize information about the Bird Gizzards behaviors of birds and mammals. You may have observed a variety of animals in your neighborhood. Maybe you have STEP 1 Fold one piece of paper widthwise into thirds. watched birds at a bird feeder. Birds don’t chew their food because they don’t have teeth. Instead, many birds swallow small pebbles, bits of eggshells, and other hard materials that go into the gizzard—a mus- STEP 2 Fold down 2.5 cm cular digestive organ. Inside the gizzard, they from the top. (Hint: help grind up the seeds. The lab below mod- From the tip of your els the action of a gizzard. index finger to your middle knuckle is about 2.5 cm.) 1. Place some cracked corn, sunflower seeds, nuts or other seeds, and some gravel in an STEP 3 Fold the rest into fifths.
    [Show full text]