Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Classical and Near Eastern Archaeology Faculty Classical and Near Eastern Archaeology Research and Scholarship

1981 Review of PHILIAS CHARIN: Miscellanea di studi classici in onore di Eugenio Manni, by various authors Brunilde S. Ridgway Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]

Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/arch_pubs Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons

Custom Citation Ridgway, Brunilde S. 1981. Review of PHILIAS CHARIN: Miscellanea di studi classici in onore di Eugenio Manni, by various authors. American Journal of Archaeology 85:501-502.

This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/arch_pubs/45

For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1981] BOOK REVIEWS 501 good reason. Since Kraft's System appeared in 1970, This reconstruction may sound complicated to the no one could question that dies were shared among non-numismatist; it took me about half a day to trace cities, particularly in the Severan period and after; it when, presumably, von Aulock could simply have Kraft posited a far smaller number of mints than is- laid out the linkage that would have narrowed the suing authorities-perhaps no more than a dozen absolute dates for all the coins involved. Some further serving the whole Anatolian peninsula. aids would be helpful: a map, as none of the cities Some of the sites Kraft identified as central mints here surveyed leaps immediately to mind; and, most have been questioned, as have some of his stylistic importantly of all, indices of types, countermarks and links. And since he chose to illustrate only single die magistrates' names. links, a study such as von Aulock's helps lend cre- These criticisms are really suggestions which would dence to Kraft's central point by showing just how make the sound work of a good scholar more useful extensive was the sharing of dies. In addition, the to the numismatist and more palatable to the historian comprehensive survey of surviving coins of each city or art historian. I am told that part 2 of this work is demonstrates the sparse nature of this coinage: many in press, and the editors of that work-or anyone who if not most types are known only from single dies or might wish to assemble von Aulock's Gesammelte die pairs. Schriften-would perform an immense service to the Von Aulock shares with Kraft a tendency to lay out scholarly community by indexing this and his other the available evidence and let it speak for itself. This works. approach has the advantage of economy, but it also WILLIAM E. METCALF makes it difficult, even for one passingly familiar with THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY the to it all in material, put perspective. For example, BROADWAY AT I55TH STREET at Bria there are several struck in the names of types NEW YORK, NEW YORK I0032 Septimius Severus, Julia Domna and Plautilla. In the headings each coin is only broadly dated within the IIAIAIA XAPIN-MISCELLANEA DI STUDI CLASSICI termini of the individuals 'involved. Yet all these is- IN ONOREDI EUGENIOMANNI, by various authors, sues were produced under the strategos Apollonios, 6 vols., pp. xxiii + 2240, 138 pls. G. Bretschnei- and it is universally acknowledged that coins of Plau- Rome tilla cannot have been produced after A.D. 205; why der, 1980. not out the likelihood that all these coins should point Eugenio Manni, holder of the Chair in Ancient be her placed during ascendancy? History at the University of Palermo, founder of The case of Otros is even more difficult to follow. Kokalos, and moving force behind many other jour- Coins struck for this are the most nu- city among nals and institutions on ancient studies, had already merous and most successful of those cata- artistically been honored by his students with a collection of es- in this volume. Here two were re- logued magistrates says (Studi di Storia Antica, Rome 1976), after 25 for under the Severans: sponsible coinage Alexandros, years of teaching. He is now being by over 135 an and an archiereus and son of an f&ted Asiarch, Nigrinos, Italian and foreign scholars, at the moment of his re- Asiarch (perhaps of Alexandros himself?). Their tirement, with a six-volume collection of articles coins are die-linked and therefore if not abso- closely, which, in their range, reflect the many interests of the Coins were for Otros lutely, contemporary. produced honorand. The majority deals with points of ancient in the names of Geta and Domna-it Caracalla, Julia history, but many are of philological, epigraphic and be an accident of survival that is may only nothing yet archaeological import. Since a thorough review of known for Now the of Otros is Septimius. coinage such magnum opus is beyond the compass of this also die-linked to that of several other cities: both journal (and of a single reviewer), only the archaeo- Alexandros and share obverse dies with coins Nigrinos logical contributions are here briefly listed. The ar- struck for in the name of an Apameia Artemas, ago- ticles are arranged alphabetically by author. Note that and with coins struck for Bruzus in the nothetes, married ladies have been listed by their maiden names, name of Kaikilios In an obverse Rouphinos. addition, and R. Ross Holloway by his middle initial. die used for coins of Alexandros is found with reverses Emphasis on was to be expected, given Pro- of 8 other one used for at two others. cities, Nigrinos fessor Manni's academic affiliation, but this insular All are Severan issues various members of involving horizon embraces indigenous and Punic sites, beside the But the most link of all imperial family. important the Graeco-Roman, and one article (by D.H. Trump) is that of a die shared Alexandros and by Nigrinos discusses Maltese temples and their priority over with an issue of Siocharax struck epi Philiskou Ai- Egyptian structures. Punic subjects range from dis- douch (whatever that means-von Aulock does not cussion on the origins of the sign of Tanit (A.M. Bisi; comment). This link is once again crucial for the G. Garbini) to jewelry and amulets from Palermo chronology of the Otros issue, since Philiskos' coinage (I. Tamburello); from Carthaginian military bases in includes a unique piece struck in the name of Plau- the Mediterranean (S. Moscati) to religious architec- tilla. ture at (A. Ciasca) and Monte Adranone 502 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY [AJA 85 (G. Fiorentini). The Punic and Greek spheres are Syracusan coinage under Dionysios I; R. Macaluso, on spanned by C.A. Di Stefano (archaeological evidence coins inscribed Kainon; H.B. Mattingly on M. Anto- from 4th c. B.C. Lilybaion) and V. Tusa, with his nius, C. Verres and the sack of Delos by the pirates); article on sacred buildings of non-Greek origin in one on the fountain of Eros at Elea (B. Neutsch) and Western Sicily (Solois, Punic Selinus, , lato). one on Paestan tombs and Greek sarcophagi (A. Waso- Selinus receives additional attention: both A. Di wicz) complete the archaeological offerings. They rep- Vita and J. de la Geniere discuss its fortifications and resent only a small sample of the many riches to be layout (which now includes some well-built extramu- found in this truly monumental Festschrift. The Greek house in the 6th ral houses). Sicily (from BRUNILDE SIsMONDo RIDGWAY to the cs. is reviewed E. De Miro, with 3rd B.C.) by DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICALAND useful accounts on , Heraklea Minoa, Akragas, NEAR EASTERN ARCHAEOLOGY Monte Saraceno, and , Morgan- BRYN MAWR COLLEGE tina. Other articles on topics of Sicilian architecture BRYN MAWR, PENNSYLVANIA are contributed by N. Bonacasa (on the identification 19010 of the various cult structures at , preponder- ATTIC BILINGUAL VASES AND THEIR PAINTERS, by antly given to ); by D. Pancucci (on the Beth Cohen. xv Garland temene of the chthonian divinities at Akragas); and Pp. + 557, pls. 129. by R.A. Wilson (who attributes the Syracusan amphi- Publishing, Inc., New York and 1978. theater to the and to the Augustan period perhaps Cohen has written two separate studies under a sin- same architect who built the one at Carthage). B. Bi- gle title. The first part of this work concerns the old linski publishes the accounts of a Polish traveller, of whether the who in excavated two problem Andokides/Lysippides paint- F. Bielinski, 1791 Akragan were the work of one or two tombs. er(s)' bilinguals painters. The is a of Of interest are two contri- second, slightly longer part, survey cups comparable antiquarian with rf exteriors and bf interiors. The two sections of butions: R. on the various of Chevallier, descriptions the book are linked the common term of "bi- the Arch of Titus in from to and only by Rome, 1607 1977; As indicated the Cohen on Winckelmann and We re- lingual." by title, proceeds by J. Irmscher, Olympia. to the within the total oeuvre turn to with L.H. and her trying place bilinguals Olympia Jeffery specula- of each of the and considered. tions on Alkamenes and the erection of Ni- painters painter groups Paionios, A total of over vases is and Cohen kai Mantineia and as a to 250 discussed, by Elis, Argos, compliment makes a number of astute observations about individ- at the time of the alliance. quadruple ual and individual These comments Articles on deal with and pieces painters. pottery stamps form the value of this work. evidence from Monte lato primary comparable (H.P. Isler); What is is a framework with new theories on vases lacking larger conceptual Centuripan polychrome and an to vases into the with as an index of ability place bilingual general (E. Joly); black-glazed pottery of Attic vase This is true for the Sicilian in the commercial movements in the picture production. presence vases of the Andokides but even more southwestern Mediterranean A.D. Tren- large workshop, (J.P. Morel). so for the diffuse of which dall a new the production bilingual cups suggests interpretation, involving story over a number of well-known in- and on a range workshops of Adrastos, Tydeos Polynikes calyx-krater those of Menon and from to which S. Woodford cluding , Hischylos, Lipari (ca. 340-330 B.C.), and such as Oltos and Dis- a note on a with the painters Psiax, . appends majolica plate painted cussions tend to move from vase to vase without an same subject in 1532. R.R. Holloway compares Italic overall view or theme and are basically descriptive winged figures in armor with the depiction of Hypnos rather than Thanatos on the krater in New analytical. and York, While on the studies and lists of Sir and new for some on that dependent John suggests readings dipinti Beazley and, to a lesser extent, of H. Bloesch, Cohen vase. does not advance their work but rather moves later- Graffiti on form the of two articles. pottery subjects ally. She fills in the lists with but M.T. Piraino Manni discusses on sherds Beazley descriptions, inscriptions does not build upon them. Thus the extended discus- from the Geloan fall within akropolis; they primarily sion of the bilingual amphorae reaffirms (I hope fi- the 6th and cs. B.C. and are all in the Greek 5th nally) Beazley's ultimate judgment that the Lysip- not all in the Greek Two alphabet, although language. pides Painter is not the Andokides Painter. In the small Roman bowls carry inscriptions mentioning study of cups, Cohen does not move beyond Beazley Catilina and Cato, which S. Panciera discusses on his- in any meaningful way. torical grounds, raising doubts on authenticity. A In her discussions, particularly of the Lysippides technical appendix leaves the question open: the bowls Painter and the Andokides Painter, Cohen assumes seem ancient and nothing can be found against the that we have in our possession the entire production contemporaneity of the graffiti. of these painters, although she obviously knows and Three numismatic articles (A. Cutroni Tusa, on elsewhere indicates that this is not the case. Having