POLICY STATEMENT
ANNUAL REPORT 2002 AN GHNÍOMHAIREACHT DO CHOMHRAC NA BOCHTAINE TUAIRISC BHLIANTÚIL
i
Annual Report 2002
Combat Poverty Agency Bridgewater Centre Conyngham Road Islandbridge Dublin 8 www.combatpoverty.ie [email protected] Tel. 01 670 6746 ii
Combat Poverty Board members as at 31 May 2003
Brian Duncan (Chair), Pearse O’Hanrahan (Vice-Chairmans), Maria Corrigan, Frank Curran, Bernard Feeney, Anthony Gavin, Maria Gorman, Helen Johnston, Tony Lane, Christina Maguire, Seamus McAleavey, Joan O’Flynn, Marie O’Neill, Alice Robertson, Margaret Sweeney, Olive Sweetman.
Aim The aim of Combat Poverty is to promote a just and inclusive society by working for the prevention and elimination of poverty and social exclusion. Combat Poverty works to achieve this aim by:
Conducting high quality research and innovative initiatives, which are recognised for their rigour and creative approach;
Advising policy makers on effective and innovative approaches to prevent and eliminate poverty;
Promoting our work among policy makers, the social partners, relevant community and voluntary sector groups and the public.
These aims will be realised through the four general functions set out in the Combat Poverty Agency Act 1986: policy advice; project support and innovation; research; public education. iii
Further information
Combat Poverty website www.combatpoverty.ie provides an overview of our activities and services.
A copy of Combat Poverty’s 2002-2004 Strategic Plan and publications catalogue is available free of charge and on our website @ www.combatpoverty.ie
Combat Poverty Agency Bridgewater Centre Conyngham Road Islandbridge Dublin 8
Tel. 353-1-670 6746 Fax 353-1-670 6760 Email: [email protected] www.combatpoverty.ie
This document is published in size 14 point to facilitate accessibility of the document for people with visual impairment. The Annual Report will be made available, on request, in a range of formats including audio tape, braille and computer disc.
Photography by Derek Speirs contents 1
Réamhrá an Chathaoirligh 2
Chairman’s Foreword 5
Part 1 – Annual Overview 9
Part 2 – Work of the Combat Poverty Agency 19
Appendix 1 – Board, Sub-Committees and Staff 57
Appendix 2 – Projects funded by Combat Poverty 65
Appendix 3 – Grants approved under the EU Special Support Programme for Peace and Reconciliation 71
Appendix 4 – Some new publications 77
Financial Statements 79 2 Réamhrá an Chathaoirligh Éirinn. Cuireadh an feidhmeannas comhroinnte cumhachta ar fionraí i Is cúis áthais dom an 16ú Tuarascáil dTuaisceart Éireann ach tá an Clár Bhliantúil de chuid na Gníomhaireachta Síochána á chur chun feidhme fós do Chomhrac na Bochtaine a thíolacadh againn sna Contaetha Teorann agus ar don Aire Gnóthaí Sóisialacha agus bhonn trasteorann in éineacht lenár Teaghlaigh. gcomhpháirtithe Area Development Management Ltd, Community Leagann an tuarascáil seo amach an dul Foundation for Northern Ireland agus chun cinn a rinne an Ghníomhaireacht Co-operation Ireland. do Chomhrac na Bochtaine sa bhliain 2002. Ba é sin an chéad bhliain dár I dtaca le cúrsaí geilleagair de, níor bPlean Straitéiseach trí bliana Ag éalaigh Éire ón maolú domhanda ar fhás Comhrac na Bochtaine in Éirinn eacnamaíoch ná ó na srianta ar Athraitheach. Tharla a lán athruithe sa mhaoiniú poiblí. Is é a lean as sin ná tréimhse 2002 go 2003, i réimsí na gearradh siar ar roinnt seirbhísí polaitíochta agus an gheilleagair agus i frithbhochtaine agus pobail. gcúrsaí sóisialta agus cultúrtha. Anuraidh, is é sin le rá an bhliain 2002, I dtaca leis an réimse polaitíochta de, bhí chuir an Rialtas tús leis an Straitéis olltoghchán ann sa bhliain 2002 agus Náisiúnta Frithbhochtaine cuireadh an seanrialtas ar ais i réim. Is í athbhreithnithe (NAPS) Ag Tógáil Sochaí Máire Ní Chochláin an tAire Gnóthaí Uilechuimsitheach, ar straitéis í ina Sóisialacha agus Teaghlaigh anois agus leagtar amach spriocanna tá caidreamh maith curtha ar bun uaillmhianacha maidir le deireadh a chur eadrainn le bliain anuas. Cuirimid fáilte le bochtaine in Éirinn. Mar gheall ar roimh bhunú na hOifige shriantachtaí airgeadais níorbh fhéidir Uilechuimsitheachta Sóisialta agus tá dul chun cinn substaintiúil a dhéanamh iarracht déanta againn nirt a chéile a d’fhonn na spriocanna sin a shroicheadh chomhlánú agus sinn ag obair le chéile i mBuiséad 2003. Ach tugadh tús áite do chun deireadh a chur le bochtaine in bheartais leasa shóisialaigh seachas do 3 laghdú cánach ioncaim rud ar Sa chomhthéacs athraitheach sin, tá chuireamar fáilte roimhe mar bheart iarracht déanta ag an nGníomhaireacht tábhachtach sa chomhrac i gcoinne do Chomhrac na Bochtaine sochaí chóir bochtaine. uilechuimsitheach a chur chun cinn trí shaothrú chun bochtaine a chosc agus I mbliana d’oibrigh an Ghníomhaireacht chun deireadh a chur léi mar a leanas: do Chomhrac na Bochtaine leis an Oifig Uilechuimsitheachta Sóisialta le linn Tuiscint níos cuimsithí a sholáthar ar Plean Náisiúnta na hÉireann i gcoinne bhochtaine agus ar eisiamh sóisialta; Bochtaine agus Eisiaimh Shóisialta a Tacaíocht a thabhairt maidir le cur ullmhú, ar plean é atá ina chuid de chlár chun feidhme éifeachtach na Uilechuimsitheacht Shóisialta na hEorpa Straitéise Náisiúnta Frithbhochtaine atá beartaithe chun laghdú (NAPS); substainteach a dhéanamh ar an Seirbhísí poiblí agus cláir cheantar- mbochtaine ar fud na hEorpa. Glacadh bhunaithe, lena n-áirítear síocháin, comhairle go forleathan chun a fháil a mheasúnú agus a chur chun cinn; amach cad iad na nithe is gá déileáil leo Cumas na hearnála forbartha pobail ionas go bhféadfaí na gealltanais sa a neartú; agus NAPS a chomhlíonadh. Beartais nuálacha a mholadh atá dírithe ar acmhainní a dháileadh ar I dtaca le cúrsaí cultúir de, tá athrú ag shlí níos cothroime. teacht ar Éirinn agus tá an tsochaí ag teacht chun bheith i bhfad níos Rinneadh dul chun cinn sna réimsí sin go ilchultúrtha. Cé gur rud dearfach é sin, léir mar a thuairiscítear sa tuarascáil ach is é atá tar éis tarlú dá bharr ná go tá a lán oibre le déanamh fós. Go bhfuil cineálacha nua bochtaine ann háirithe, ní mór dúinn a chinntiú, maidir agus is minic a tharlaíonn sé sin mar le daoine atá i gcúinsí ina bhfuil siad gheall ar idirdhealú agus ar chiníochas. soghonta mar gheall ar bhochtaine, Is dúshlán é sin fós sa chomhrac i eisiamh nó coimhlint, go bhfaigheann gcoinne bochtaine. siad tacaíocht chun a gcúinsí a fheabhsú agus chun go mbeidh caighdeán 4
maireachtála acu a mheastar a bheith saothar. Cuirim fáilte chuig an mBord inghlactha in Éirinn sa 21ú haois. Chomh roimh Tony Lane, Frank Curran, Anthony maith leis sin, ní mór dúinn na príomh- Gavin, Maria Gorman, Olive Sweetman, sheirbhísí poiblí a fheabhsú, go háirithe Joan O’Flynn agus Marie O’Neill, agus cúram sláinte, oideachas, tithíocht, cuirim fáilte freisin roimh athcheapadh cúram leanaí agus iompar poiblí. Alice Robertson agus Maria Corrigan.
I dtaca leis an dul chun cinn atá déanta, Mar fhocal scoir, ba mhaith liom mo is mian liom buíochas a ghabháil i leith bhuíochas a léiriú i leith thacaíocht na dhíograis agus oilteacht ghairmiúil Bhord Roinne Gnóthaí Sóisialacha agus agus fhoireann na Gníomhaireachta do Teaghlaigh agus gabhaim buíochas leis Chomhrac na Bochtaine, agus fhoireann an Aire, leis an Ard-Rúnaí agus le ár gcomhpháirtíochta le ADM i hoifigigh na Roinne as a spreagadh agus Muineachán. Tháinig deireadh le téarma as a gcúnamh le bliain anuas. ceapacháin roinnt daoine den Bhord sa tréimhse 2002/2003. Gabhaim buíochas le Benny Devlin, Niall O’Keefe, Michael Waugh, Clare Farrell, Fintan Farrell, Brian Duncan Grace Maguire agus Mary Kennedy as a Meitheamh 2003
“ní mór dúinn a chinntiú, maidir le daoine atá i gcúinsí ina bhfuil siad soghonta mar gheall ar bhochtaine, eisiamh nó coimhlint, go bhfaigheann siad tacaíocht chun a gcúinsí a fheabhsú agus chun go mbeidh caighdeán maireachtála acu a mheastar a bheith inghlactha in Éirinn sa 21ú haois.” 5 Chairman’s Foreword Community Foundation for Northern Ireland and Co-operation Ireland). It is with pleasure that I present the 16th Annual Report of Combat Poverty to the Economically, Ireland has not escaped Minister for Social and Family Affairs. the global downturn with a slow down in economic growth and restricted public This report sets out the progress made finances. This has resulted in cutbacks in by Combat Poverty in 2002. This was some anti-poverty and community the first year of our three year Strategic services. Plan Combating Poverty in a Changing Ireland. There was much change in the Last year, 2002, the Government period 2002 to 2003, in the political, launched the revised National Anti- economic, social and cultural arenas. Poverty Strategy (NAPS) Building an Inclusive Society, setting out ambitious On the political front we had a general targets for the elimination of poverty in election in 2002 where the outgoing Ireland. Financial constraints meant that government was returned. Mary it was not possible to make substantial Coughlan is now the Minister for Social progress towards meeting these targets and Family Affairs and we have built a in the 2003 Budget. However, social productive relationship over the last year. welfare policies were prioritised over tax We welcome the establishment of the cuts, which we welcome as important in Office for Social Inclusion and have the fight against poverty. sought to complement each other’s strengths as we work together to This year, Combat Poverty has been eliminate poverty in Ireland. In Northern working with the Office for Social Ireland we saw the suspension of the Inclusion in the preparation of Ireland’s power sharing executive, as we National Plan against Poverty and Social continued to implement the Peace Exclusion, which is part of the European Programme in the Border Counties and Social Inclusion programme to on a cross-border basis with our partners substantially reduce poverty through-out (Area Development Management Ltd, Europe. Extensive consultation has been 6
undertaken, to hear first hand the issues Proposing innovative policies aimed to be addressed, with a view to building at a more equal distribution of on the commitments in the NAPS. resources.
Culturally, Ireland has been changing, Progress has been made in all of these becoming a much more intercultural areas as outlined in the report, but much society. While this is a positive more remains to be done. In particular, development, in some instances it has we need to ensure that people who find led to new forms of poverty, often-times themselves in vulnerable situations, through discrimination and racism. either through poverty, exclusion or This remains a challenge in the fight conflict are supported to improve their against poverty. situations and to have a standard of living considered acceptable in 21st Against this changing context, Combat century Ireland. We also need to Poverty has sought to promote a just improve key public services, especially and inclusive society by working for the healthcare, education, housing, childcare prevention and elimination of poverty and public transport. through: In making progress I want to Achieving a more comprehensive acknowledge the dedication and understanding of poverty and social professional expertise of the Board and exclusion; staff of Combat Poverty and the staff of Supporting the effective our partnership with ADM in Monaghan. implementation of the National Anti- For a number of Board members their Poverty Strategy (NAPS); terms of appointment came to an end in Assessing and promoting effective the 2002/2003 period. I thank Benny public services and area-based Devlin, Niall O’Keefe, Michael Waugh, programmes including peace; Clare Farrell, Fintan Farrell, Grace Strengthening the capacity of the Maguire and Mary Kennedy for their community development sector; and contributions. I welcome to the Board 7
Tony Lane, Frank Curran, Anthony Gavin, Maria Gorman, Olive Sweetman, Joan O’Flynn and Marie O’Neill, as well as the re-appointments of Alice Robertson and Maria Corrigan.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge the support of the Department of Social and Family Affairs and thank the Minister, the Secretary-General and Departmental officials for their encouragement and assistance over the last year.
Brian Duncan June 2003 “we need to ensure that people who find themselves in vulnerable situations, either through poverty, exclusion or conflict are supported to improve their situations and to have a standard of living considered acceptable in 21st century Ireland.” 8
”child poverty damages children’s well-being as well as their future well-being as adults” 9
Part 1 Annual Overview A Family Policy for All 10 Introduction What is Family?
2004 is the 10th anniversary of the There are many understandings and United Nations International Year of the interpretations of what is a family. In Family. The Minister for Social and Family celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the Affairs, Mary Coughlan TD is UN International Year of the Family it is undertaking consultations through-out useful to refer to the UN definition of the country to “take the pulse of the the family. The UN focuses on a broad nation on how best the state can definition of the family as the basic unit support families”. This represents an of society in all its forms whether opportunity for Ireland to promote traditional, biological, common law, family policy that supports all families, extended or one parent1. In many particularly those in poverty. ways this reflects the changing patterns in modern society and For the first six months of 2004 Ireland diversity of relationships which make holds the EU Presidency. One of the key up family units. themes identified for the Irish EU Presidency is supporting families. Our Evidence would suggest that a general Presidency will also see the approval by redefinition of family is taking place, the EU Council of the Joint Report on which involves a move to a focus on the Social Inclusion. This report will provide obligations of parenthood rather than an analysis of the National Action Plans marital ties2. “Family solidarity is being Against Poverty and Social Exclusion, reinterpreted and redefined to refer to prepared by all Member States in 2003. parental responsibility rather than The combination of these policy spouses’ or partners’ solidarity towards developments and actions should result each other”.3 Across European countries in strengthened support for families there is a weakening of marital ties and affected by poverty and social exclusion. a diversification of forms of private life. This has implications for family policy and supports, with an increasing focus on parental obligations and relations.
1 The definition used by the United Nations is: “Any combination of two or more persons who are bound together by ties of mutual consent, birth and/or adoption or placement and who, together, assume responsibility for, inter alia, the care and maintenance of group members through procreation or adoption, the socialisation of children and the social control of members”. Commission on the Family (1998) Strengthening Families for Life. Dublin: Commission on the Family. 2 Daly, M. and S. Clavero (2002) Contemporary Family Policy: A Comparative Review of Ireland, France, Germany, Sweden and the UK. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration for the Department of Social and Family Affairs. 3 Letablier, M.T. & G. Rueucau (2000) “The Policy Logics of Action about Caring for Children”, Paper presented at the 4th Seminar of the TESR Network Working and Mothering: Social Practices and Social Policies, Paris, March 23-25. 11
This has a clear connection with a focus Key trends include: on children and the rights of children. The number of families in the state Families in Ireland have an increasingly increased by over 30% from 1981 to wide diversity of forms, with family size 2002, with the majority of the in general declining. Figure 1 provides an increase taking place in the 1996 to illustration of the diversity of household 2002 period. types existing in Ireland. In 2002 there The fastest growing category was were 1,287,958 private households in families (whether married or not) Ireland. without children – their number increased by nearly 80% since 1981. Over three quarters of families of all Figure 1: Living Arrangements4: families in 2002 had two children or 1996 and 2002 less, compared to 62% in 1981. The number of families with four or more children almost halved over the 500 1996 21 year period, standing now at 2002 78,900. 400 The average number of children per family fell from 2.2 to 1.6 over this 300 period. In total, there were 1,470,800 200 children in family units in Ireland in 2002. 100 In 2002 there were 77,600 cohabiting couples, up 31,300 from 0 1996. These comprised 8.4% of others Others
Couple family units in 2002, compared to children 3.9% in 1996. One Person with others Lone Parent Couple with Couple with Lone parent with children Almost two thirds of cohabiting couples had no children.
4 Source: Central Statistics Office (2003) Census 2002: Principal Demographic Results. Dublin: Stationery Office. Notes: 1. Couples include both married and cohabiting couples. 2. Couples with others includes couples with children and other persons. 3. Lone parents with others includes lone parents with children and other persons. 4. Others include two or more family units and non-family households. 12
The number of same sex cohabiting couples recorded increased from 150 Figure 2: 6 in 1996 to 1,300 in 2002. Families in Consistent Poverty There were nearly 154,000 lone parent families in 2002, 85% of 30 these being headed by women. 25 40% of lone parent families were
headed by a widowed person, a 20 further 32% by a separated or divorced person and 24% by a single 15 person. 10 Persons aged 65 years and over living
alone accounted for 41% of all 5 persons living alone in 2002. 0 Families in Poverty All 2 Adult 2 Adult 1 Adult 1 Adult 2 Adult 2 Children 4 Children & Children When we focus on families in poverty we find that families with four or more children and lone parent families have In total, it is estimated that 5.5% of the highest risk of being poor, see Figure households (approximately 71,000 2. While the number of large families in households) experience consistent the population as a whole is declining, poverty (ie. are living on an income of the level of child poverty in Ireland is less than €172 per adult per week and relatively high: 8 per cent of children do not have basic necessities such as have a risk of consistent poverty; with a food, clothes and heating). quarter of all under 18 year olds living in low income households5. Child poverty Households headed by someone who is damages children’s well-being as well as ill or has a disability have a relatively their future well-being as adults. high risk of consistent poverty at 11%. However, when we look at households living below the income poverty line of
5 Low income households are households with an income below 60% of the median, which was approximately €147 per week for a single adult in 2000. 6 Percentage of persons below 70% of median income and experiencing basic deprivation by household type, in 2000. Nolan, B., Gannon, B., Layte, R., Watson, D, Whelan, C.T. and Williams, J. (2002) Monitoring Poverty Trends in Ireland: Results from the 2000 Living in Ireland Survey. Dublin: ESRI Policy Research series, No. 45 13
€147 per week, that poverty risk show that non-Irish nationals now make increases to 54%. This risk is up nearly 6% of the population. accentuated by the costs associated with However, the economic, social and having a disability as well as barriers to cultural position of many ethnic minority full participation in society. families, including Travellers place them at risk of poverty in Ireland. Households headed by someone who is unemployed continue to have a high risk Other families who may find themselves – with just over 50% living below the at risk of poverty include older women income poverty line and 22% in living alone. An increasing trend in consistent poverty. In fact, people in Ireland in recent years has been the workless households make up 70% of increase in poverty risk for single adult the consistently poor population, households, which mainly comprise comprising people working in the home, single adults living alone, the majority of unemployed people, retired people whom are older women. and disabled people. Low paid employees account for a quarter Families may also find themselves in of the consistently poor. vulnerable situations because of the effect of violence inside or outside the Many families find themselves in home. Domestic violence can have a vulnerable situations for a variety of serious detrimental impact on families reasons that can increase their risk of and lead to an increased risk of poverty. poverty. Vulnerable families include External violence has also impacted on homeless families, particularly women family life in Ireland. For example, in the and children. The estimated number of Border Region in particular, but also homeless households remains high at through-out Ireland, the Northern 3,773 in 2002, as compared to 3,743 Ireland conflict has impacted on family in 19997. life. Research has found that children in poor families are most at risk from Ireland is becoming a more intercultural violence associated with the conflict in society which has many positive benefits Northern Ireland.8 for Irish life. The recent census results
7 Department of Environment and Local Government (2003) Housing Statistics Bulletin: December Quarter 2002. Dublin: Stationery Office. 8 Fay, M.T., Morrisey, M., Smyth, M. and T. Wong (1999) The Cost of the Troubles Study. Pluto Press 14
It is also important to note that families of their money went on food, household do not exist in isolation, but are bills and their children’s basic needs so comprised of individuals and exist in that these households were very communities. Family policy and supports vulnerable to shortages for regular and thus need to recognise the rights and irregular expenses. As a result, needs of individuals within the family unit borrowing and indebtedness were and the community and environment widespread. within which the family exists. It has been argued that a vibrant community life can The Celtic Tiger bypassed these families. support the family unit.9 In fact, many felt relatively deprived during the economic boom. They could While statistics give a useful perspective see and hear about others doing well, on the scale and nature of poverty but their situation either remained static, experienced by families it is important to disimproved or only marginally get behind the numbers to obtain an improved. insight into the experience of poverty and its impact on the family. One striking finding was the extent of poor health among these families. One The Reality of Family Poverty in three households highlighted health problems in relation to children. The reality of family poverty is illustrated Reference was made to the content and in a recent Combat Poverty study based nutritional balance of the children’s on the experiences of 30 families10. The diets. Providing a nutritional diet costs families were chosen to reflect the broad money. In a minority of households spectrum of circumstances facing Irish children were sometimes kept out of families in poverty: rural and urban, one school because of a lack of food. and two parents, small and large families and working and non-working. Contrary to the view of a supportive community life, the local environment These families were very poor, living on for the families in the study was often a €124 per week on average11. Almost all negative aspect of their lives. Many
9 Commission on the Family (1996) Strengthening Families for Life: Interim Report to the Minister for Social Welfare”. Dublin: Commission on the Family. 10 Daly, M. and M. Leonard (2002) Against All Odds: Family Life on a Low Income in Ireland. Institute of Public Administration in association with the Combat Poverty Agency. 11 The study was undertaken in the year 2000. Figures and amounts refer to the year 2000. 15 adults felt bullied and picked upon. Lone they did not have brand name clothes or mothers in particular were very vulnerable runners. in this regard. They felt their homes were more likely to be targeted because there The Policy Context was no man living there. In the local areas there was a lack of local amenities A number of national policy initiatives and services. The threat of being burgled have been taken to address issues of or attacked as well as the presence of joy- family poverty. For example, the riding and drug misuse locally was also Commission on the Family adopted a raised. Under these circumstances family “families first” approach, aimed at relationships were cited as being crucial in putting families at the centre of social helping people to keep going when times and economic policy making. Recently, were tough. the Government has established a Family Support Agency, to support families, The study also focused on the impact on promote the continuity of stability in children of living on a low income. family life, prevent marital breakdown Children valued their family. Half of the and foster a supportive community children in the study viewed their family environment for families at a local level. as the best thing in their lives. The A similar policy emphasis exists in regard concerns of children were mainly about to the well-being of children, the pressures of trying to fit in with their underpinned by the UN Convention on peers. For example, wearing the right the Rights of the Child, which sets out a clothes was seen as important in being comprehensive list of children’s rights. accepted by peers. This meant that The Convention is being implemented in certain brand names often had to be Ireland through the National Children’s bought even though this was an Strategy launched in 2000. A National expensive option. Unfortunately, school Children’s Office has been established to was, for some children, a place of oversee the implementation of the danger rather than learning. A quarter strategy, with the county and city of the children admitted that they had development boards having a local been bullied at school – often because policy remit. 16
The main national policy to address Poverty and Social Exclusion 2003-2005 poverty is the National Anti-Poverty to the European Commission. Following Strategy. The revised strategy Building an extensive consultation process the an Inclusive Society contains targets to Government has set out a range of eliminate poverty generally by 2007, targets, strategies and measures to with child poverty being specifically tackle poverty in Ireland, building on the mentioned. One of the key strategies to priorities and initiatives identified in the address this is to raise the basic social National Anti-Poverty Strategy and the welfare rate to €150 per week (2002 new Social Partnership Agreement prices) by 2007 and to fulfil the Sustaining Progress. An element of this Government’s commitment to raise child Plan, as advised by the European Union, benefit to €34.50 per week (€149.90) is to promote greater family solidarity in per month. The Strategy also proposes all its forms. greater equality of access to education, health and housing services for children. Policies and Measures to In addition, the Strategy addresses a Combat Family Poverty number of policy concerns relating to the delivery of public services; the need A range of policies and measures are for family support initiatives; the required to address family poverty and prevention of anti-social behaviour; exclusion. Addressing issues of family teenage pregnancy and child suicide; the poverty at an early stage will ensure that regeneration of poor communities and families are less vulnerable and more run down areas; and the needs of able to participate fully through-out their families in vulnerable situations, such as lives. Families with greatest needs families with a disabled person, some identified by Combat Poverty are: minority ethnic groups, including Families with 4 or more children Travellers and homeless families, which Lone parent families are relevant to combating family poverty. Single adult families, especially women In July 2003, the Government submitted Vulnerable families. its National Action Plan against 17
Key policy measures to combat family Public Services poverty are recommended as follows: Better provision of and access to public services in general for families Basic Income Support: at risk of poverty. Increase the minimum social welfare rate to €150 per week, Education in 2002 prices. Increase to 10,000 the number of pre-school places for disadvantaged Child Supports: children As a priority fulfil the commitment to Extend support for families such as increase Child Benefit to €149.90 Home-School-Community Liaison, per month (€34.50 per week) Early Start, Breaking the Cycle Review child income support (based Eliminate the costs of participating in on research being undertaken by education for disadvantaged families. Combat Poverty) Expand the school meal/breakfast Health scheme Increase the income thresholds to Further develop initiatives like improve eligibility to the medical card Springboard and Family Services scheme Projects. Complement this with a reform of the General Medical System (GMS) Family Solidarity Improve access to affordable, quality Work towards universal access to healthcare services. high quality affordable childcare by 2005 Housing/Accommodation Extend administrative arrangements Increase the range of provision of to ensure individual payments of social housing to meet diverse family social welfare needs Consider individualisation through Deliver 20,000 new local authority social insurance housing completions between 2003 Improve provision for carers. and 2005 Work to eliminate homelessness by 2007 18 Deliver on Traveller Accommodation Conclusion Plans. 2004 heralds the 10th Anniversary of Families with a Disability the International Year of the Family. Introduce a Costs of Disability Family structures in Ireland are changing payment in line with trends world-wide. Family policy in Ireland needs to recognise these Minority Ethnic Groups, including changes and ensure that family policies Travellers encompass and support all families. Promotion of interculturalism and a commitment to addressing racism Even in today’s Ireland there are families and discrimination who experience poverty, with some Improve access to employment and families having a particularly high risk. services. Family and anti-poverty policies need to support such families to enable them to Violence and Conflict move out of poverty. Many of these Commit to addressing domestic and families include the children of the external violence through family and future. As we work towards a community supports. “poverty–free” society there is a need to ensure that our policies support families in all their forms. 19
Part 2 Work of the Combat Poverty Agency 20 Work of the To strengthen the capacity of the Combat Poverty Agency community development sector in tackling poverty This section of the Report documents actions undertaken in 2002, under the To propose innovative policies aimed objectives of the Combat Poverty Agency at a more equal distribution of Strategic Plan 2002-4. Measures taken to income, resources and employment. develop Combat Poverty and enhance the quality of its work such as compliance with The Annual Report documents the first statutory and regulatory requirements and year’s work in a three year programme. management are detailed. Combat There has been satisfactory progress Poverty’s internal administrative supports under all of the objectives. However, and actions undertaken to achieve and three aspects of the work were support the delivery of the objectives particularly noteworthy in 2002: below are also outlined. The publication and launch of the Combat Poverty’s objectives for research study Against All Odds. This 2002-4 are: examined the experiences of thirty families living on a low income and, To achieve a more comprehensive in particular, highlighted the understanding of poverty and social experience of children in those exclusion, in particular child poverty, families. so as to inform and influence debate and policy Consolidation of the Local Government Anti-Poverty Learning To support the effective Network, established to support the implementation of the National Anti- extension of the National Anti- Poverty Strategy at national, local Poverty Strategy within local and European levels authorities.