DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annl Rpot for Fiscal Year Ended 30 June VOL-1 OF TWO 90th Congress, 2nd Session House Document No. 214 Pt. 1 ANNUAL REPORT, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1967 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES 1967 IN TWO VOLUMES Vol. 1 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1968 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price 70 cents CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Pacp Letter of Transmittal vii Highlights x CHATER I. THE CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM 1 1. The scope and origin of the Civil Works program 1 2. Organization 2 II. FUNDING AND COST REDUCTION 3 1. Funds available 3 2. Appropriations 5 3. Expenditures (costs) 6 4. Economy measures 8 III. NAVIGATION 11 1. Scope 11 2. Construction and operations 12 3. Waterborne Commerce 12 4. Protection of navigable waters 16 IV. FLOOD CONTROL 19 1. Flood plain management services 19 2. Construction and maintenance 20 3. Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries 21 V. HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND WATER SUPPLY 27 1. Installed capacity 27 2. Hydroelectric power production 28 3. Additional capacity scheduled 28 4. Water supply 28 VI. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT 33 1. Contributions to American Beauty program 33 2. Pollution abatement 35 VII. RECREATION 37 VIII. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 41 1. Aquatic plant control 41 2. Coastal engineering research 42 3. Engineering studies 42 4. Fisheries engineering investigations 45 5. Great Lakes research 46 6. Hydrologic studies 47 7. Hydrometeorological studies 47 8. International Hydrological Decade 47 9. Plan formulation and evaluation studies 48 10. Nuclear explosive studies for civil construction 49 IX. PLANNING 51 1. Planning, programming, budgeting system (PPBS) 51 iii Page 2. Comprehensive studies .----- 52 3. Investigations and reports 53 4. Review by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 53 5. Project authorization 54 6. Advance engineering and design 54 7. International boundary waters 54 8. Collection and study of basic data 57 9. Studies by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 58 X. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS 61 1. New legislation 61 2. Waterway transportation improvements 61 3. Water quality control ------ 61 4. Flood plain management 62 5. Reimbursement of non-federal expenditures 62 6. Review of legislation 63 7. Codification of laws 63 XI. OTHER ACTIVITIES 65 1. Beach erosion control --------- 65 2. Emergency operations . .. .. .. .. 66 3. Atlantic-Pacific Interoceanic Canal Study 67 4. Hydraulic mining, California 69 5. Washington, D.C., water supply --- 69 6. Education and training 70 APPENDIX A. NAVIGATION 73 1. Navigation improvements placed in useful operation during the fiscal year .... .. .. 73 2. Navigation improvements initiated during the fisc a l ye a r .. ... .. ... ... ... ... 74 3. Navigation improvements under construction during fiscal year 75 4. Project harbors, commerce reported for calendar year 1966 79 5. Commerce at selected areas, calendar year 1966 86 6. Ton-mileage of freight carried on U.S. inland waterways, by system, calendar year 1966 86 7. Project waterways, commerce reported for calendar year 1966 87 B. FLOOD CONTROL 101 1. Flood control projects placed in useful operation during fiscal year 1967 101 2. Flood control projects initiated during fiscal year 1967 102 3. Flood control projects under construction during fiscal year 1967 103 4. Flood control reservoirs operable June 30, 1967 108 5. Flood control reservoirs constructed or contributed to by Corps of Engineers but operated by others June 30, 1967 126 6. Project features fully completed during the fiscal y e a r - - -- ---- - - - -- - - -- - - - - 130 iv 7. Project features on which construction continued during the fiscal year --------- - 131 8. Project features on which work was initiated during the fiscal year ------ - --- -- --- -- - 131 9. Project features on which maintenance and opera- tion activities were conducted during the fiscal year -... 132 C. HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND WATER SUPPLY 131 1. Multiple-purpose projects under construction with some or all primary project features placed in useful operation during fiscal year 1967 ...... 131 2. Multiple-purpose projects under construction and not operating during fiscal year 1967 134 3. Generating capacity placed in operation during the fiscal year -- - - -- --- 135 4. Hydroelectric projects in operation June 30, 1967 -_ 136 5. Hydroelectric projects under construction June 30, 1967 -- -- - --- --- - - -- -- 137 6. Hydroelectric power by region -- 138 7. Water supply storage as of June 30, 1967 139 8. Irrigation storage as of June 30, 1967 140 D. FEATURE ARTICLES ------ --- 143 1. Foundation Conditions and Construction Procedures, Shelbyville Dam 143 2. Modernizing the Ouachita River Waterway 147 3. The Water Quality Research Program 153 E. GENERAL 155 1. Publications - -- -- - - - 155 2. Directory of installations and activities 155 Volume 2 Reports on individual project operations and related Civil Works activities are published as volume 2, for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Statistics on Waterborne Commerce of the United States are printed separately (see app. E-1). SUBJECT: Annual Report on U.S. Army Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1967 TO: THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY 1. Transmitted herewith is my annual report on the Civil Works activities of the Department of the Army, as carried out by the Corps of Engineers in fiscal year 1967. Volume 1 of this report reviews the overall program status, accomplishments, and plan- ning to meet existing and future needs, and presents summary data on water resources development by the Corps. Volume 2 con- tains detailed information on individual Civil Works projects and activities. Detailed data on U.S. waterborne commerce are pub- lished separately. 2. Civil Works activities of the Corps of Engineers involve a nationwide water resources development program which includes the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of works for navigation, beach erosion control, flood contol, hur- ricane protection, hydropower, water supply, water quality con- trol, recreation, fish and wildlife preservation, and related pur- poses, as authorized by law. 3. The active Civil Works program consists of over 4,300 pro- ject authorizations with a total estimated Federal cost of $32 billion. Appropriations for new work under this program have totaled $16 billion. Approximately $16 billion will be required to complete the active authorized improvements of over 1,200 pro- jects. Appropriations for Civil Works activities for fiscal year 1967 totaled $1.3 billion, of which over $1 billion (79 percent) was for new work. 4. Notable progress was made in carrying out project con- struction and placing additional works in useful operation. Con- struction was initiated on 70 new projects and on new items at 7 features of the Mississippi River and tributaries project. Sixty- three other projects, including 6 projects which were initiated, and items at 16 features of the Mississippi River and tributaries project, were placed in beneficial operation. Features at two multiple-purpose projects were also placed in operation. Major structural rehabilitation was carried out on 30 channel and harbor projects, 2 lock and dam projects, one reservoir project, and one multiple-purpose project. Minor structural rehabilitation was conducted on 10 navigation and two flood control projects. vii 5. This program continues to provide large and widespread benefits to the Nation. Items of major importance are- a. Navigation, calendar year 1966. Total U.S. waterborne traffic established a new record for the third consecutive year. Over 1.3 billion tons were distributed among coastal harbors and channels, Great Lakes harbors and channels, and inland and intracoastal waterways in proportions of 47, 17, and 36 percent, respectively. A total of 280 billion ton-miles of freight carried on the Great Lakes and on the inland and intracoastal waterways also established a new record. This total was composed of 116 billion ton-miles on the Great Lakes, the largest movement since 1957, and 164 billion ton-miles on the inland and intracostal waterways system, a new all-time high. b. Flood control. In December 1966 heavy rainfall caused extensive damage in southern and central California, resulting in designation of the locality as a major disaster area. In March 1967, heavy rainfall over the westerly slopes of the Appalachian Mountains caused flooding in Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Unusually heavy rains throughout most of June caused damages to the Missouri River Basin that were the heav- iest of the season. As illustrated by these and other floods during the year, the provision of an adequate degree of flood protection remains one of the most pressing aspects of the Nation's water resource development program. Damages prevented by flood con- trol projects in operation are estimated to exceed one billion dollars this fiscal year, clearly demonstrating the value of such works in reducing the drain on the Nation's economy as a result of flooding. There is a continuing recognition that protective works for flood control must be complemented with zoning con- trols and other regulatory measures to assure proper manage- ment of flood plain use. Under its flood plain management serv- ices program, the Corps is responding to increasing numbers of requests from states and local communities for advice in pre- venting flood damages. c. Hydropower. Installed capacity exceeded the 91/2 million kilowatt mark, the energy generated in fiscal year 1967 amount- ing to 43.7 billion net kilowatt-hours. These figures represent 21 percent of the Nation's total hydropower capacity and genera- tion, and 3.7 percent of its total electric power capacity and generation. The cumulative total energy generated at Corps proj- ects through fiscal year 1967 amounted to about 442 billion kilowatt-hours. d. Water supply. The Corps provides 4.4 million acre-feet of storage for water supply in 45 reservoirs, which supplements viii the water supply for more than 2 million people in about 100 cities, towns, and rural areas.
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Flood Insurance Study

    Preliminary Flood Insurance Study

    VOLUME 4 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV004A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
  • Waterfowl Rely on Catahoula Lake in Central Louisiana Enforcement of New Clean Water Rule Still Unclear for Farmers

    Waterfowl Rely on Catahoula Lake in Central Louisiana Enforcement of New Clean Water Rule Still Unclear for Farmers

    New Sorghum Pest Youth Wetlands Program Water and Food Safety page 12 page 20 page 26 Vol. 58, No. 3, Summer 2015 Waterfowl rely on Catahoula Lake in central Louisiana Enforcement of new Clean Water Rule still unclear for farmers Olivia McClure EDITORIAL BOARD: John S. Russin, Chairman Although a rule that revises which bodies of water are subject to Clean Water Linda Foster Benedict Act regulations has taken effect, the agricultural community continues to be Michael Blazier Rick Bogren concerned about how strict federal scrutiny will be. Melissa Cater Agricultural water has always been Glen T. Gentry exempt from Clean Water Act regulations, Kurt M. Guidry but the new Clean Water Rule incorporates Dustin Harrell Claudia Husseneder several types of water that were never reg- Kathy Kramer ulated before and are common on farms. Megan La Peyre Tributaries and waterways adjacent or connected to a previously jurisdictional EDITOR: Linda Foster Benedict waterway must now comply with the Clean ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Rick Bogren Water Act, said LSU AgCenter economist DESIGNER: Kathy Kramer Naveen Adusumilli. Drainage ditches and PHOTO EDITOR: John Wozniak CONTRIBUTORS: Tobie Blanchard, Craig irrigation runoff, for example, are not Gautreaux, Randy LaBauve, Elma Sue specifically regulated by the act but drain McCallum, Olivia McClure and Bruce Schultz into those that are. WEB DESIGN: Ronda Clark and Kathy Kramer “Can farmers dig a ditch now, and how Louisiana Agriculture is published quarterly by will it be regulated? It is unclear right now,” the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station. Subscriptions are free. You may also subscribe Adusumilli said. to a Web version of the magazine, which is The changes are spelled out in the available at www.LSUAgCenter.com.
  • Walk-Issue14-1963.Pdf

    Walk-Issue14-1963.Pdf

    1963 Terms and Conditions of Use Copies of Walk magazine are made available under Creative Commons - Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike copyright. Use of the magazine. You are free: • To Share- to copy, distribute and transmit the work • To Remix- to adapt the work Under the following conditions (unless you receive prior written authorisation from Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc.): • Attribution- You must attribute the work (but not in any way that suggests that Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. endorses you or your use of the work). • Noncommercial- You may not use this work for commercial purposes. • Share Alike- If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitations on Liability. Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any content of this work. Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. disclaims any warranty for the content, and will not be liable for any damage or loss resulting from the use of any content. ----···············------------------------------· • BUSHWALKING • CAVING • ROCK CLIMBING • CAMPING • SKI TOURING PROVIDE A CHALLENGE TO MAN AND HIS EQUIPMENT, FOR OVER 30 YEARS, PADDYMADE CAMP GEAR HAS PROVED ITS WORTH TO THOUSANDS OF WALKERS AND OUT-OF-DOORS ADVEN­ TURERS. MAKE SURE YOU, TOO, HAVE THE BEST OF GEAR. From- PADDY PALLIN Py. ltd. 201 CASTLEREAGH STREET, SYDNEY - Phone BM 2685 Ask for our Latest Price List Get your copy of "Bushwalking - --- and Camping," by Paddy Pallin -5/6 posted --------------------------------------------------· CWalk A JOURNAL OF THE MELBOURNE BUSHW ALKERS NUMBER FOURTEEN 1963 CONTENTS: * BY THE PEOPLE 'l ...
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management

    Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management

    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
  • AEP's 2017 GRI Report

    AEP's 2017 GRI Report

    For more information contact: Sandy Nessing Managing Director Corporate Sustainability American Electric Power [email protected] Melissa Tominack Sr. Sustainability Coordinator American Electric Power [email protected] 2 American Electric Power –2017 GRI Report 2017 Global Reporting Initiative AEP follows the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 reporting principles in terms of data quality, report content and organizational boundaries. This report was developed according to the fourth generation of GRI’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, otherwise known as G4, in accordance with a core adherence level. The GRI guidelines provide a voluntary reporting framework used by organizations around the world as the basis for sustainability reporting. We also responded using the Electric Utility Sector Supplement for reporting on industry-specific information. G4 Description Report Location Indicator Strategy and Analysis Message from the G4-1 Statement from the most senior decision-maker Chairman 2016 Form 10-K Risk Factors pg. 33 G4-2 Description of key impacts, risks, and opportunities Managing Risk Carbon Profile Analysis Strategy for Growth Organizational Profile G4-3 Name of the organization See homepage G4-4 Primary brands, products, and/or services About Us Columbus, OH G4-5 Location of organization’s headquarters About Us G4-6 Countries in which the company has operations About Us G4-7 Nature of ownership and legal form 2016 Form 10-K pg. 1 G4-8 Markets served 2016 Form 10-K pg. 1 G4-9 Scale of the reporting organization About AEP 17,634 (see appendix G4-10 Total number of employees by employment contract & gender 1) G4-11 Total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements Labor Relations Significant changes in organizations size, structure, ownership, or its G4-13 2016 Form 10-K pg.
  • Environmental Guidelines for River Management Works

    Environmental Guidelines for River Management Works

    ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR RIVER MANAGEMENT WORKS FOR THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON RIVERS AND CATCHMENTS 8571(F1) Published for the Standing Committee on Rivers and Catchments by the Department of Conservation & Environment Edited by Georgina Katsantoni Designed and Typeset by Dead Set, Fitzroy Printed by Victorian Government Printing Office ISBN 07306 2062 X © 1990 GUIDELINES Gu IDELINES FOREWORD INTRODUCTION TO RIVER MORPHOLOGY AND ECOLOGY 1 RIVER MORPHOLOGY 1 RIVER ECOLOGY 6 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES 11 STREAM MORPHOLOGY 11 PROTECTING THE STREAM ENVIRONMENT 12 RECREATION 14 GUIDELINES Guidelines Foreword The Department of Conservation and Environment is involved in river management activities throughout Victoria. Most river management works are undertaken by statutory river management authorities which receive funding through the Office of Water Resources. The Department recognizes its responsibility to ensure that stream works take adequate steps to protect or enhance the aquatic and streamside environment. This report is one in a series prepared for the Standing Committee on Rivers and Catchments to assist government agencies and other authorities involved in river management. It provides a basic introduction to river morphology and ecology and describes the environmental effects of river management works. It also brings together a number of case studies and suggests ways in which major types of river management works should be carried out to protect stream environments. Horrie Poussard Convenor Standing Committee on Rivers and Catchments GUIDELINES Introduction to River Morphology and Ecology When Europeans settled in Victoria less than River morphology two centuries ago, these natural instabilities were This introduction to river morphology briefly regarded as incompatible with the way the land was describes and explains the processes which have to be used.
  • The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    NATIONAL WETLANDS NEWSLETTER, vol. 29, no. 2. Copyright © 2007 Environmental Law Institute.® Washington D.C., USA.Reprinted by permission of the National Wetlands Newsletter. To subscribe, call 800-433-5120, write [email protected], or visit http://www.eli.org/nww. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: Assessment of International Designations Within the United States The Ramsar Convention is an international framework used to protect wetlands. At this time, the United States has 22 designated sites listed as wetlands of international importance. In this Article, the authors analyze survey data collected from each of these 22 sites to determine whether and how Ramsar designation benefits these wetland areas. BY ROYAL C. GARDNER AND KIM DIANA CONNOLLY ssues related to wetlands and wetland protection often involve engage in international cooperation.6 Its nonregulatory approach boundaries. Sometimes the lines are drawn on the ground, has led some to ask what benefits are associated with Ramsar des- delineating between so-called “jurisdictional” wetlands and ignation. For example, the United States has a maze of federal, uplands. Sometimes the boundaries are conceptual: trying state, and local laws that protect wetlands, so does the international Ito determine the proper relationship between the federal and state recognition of a site provide any additional returns? To answer governments with respect to wetland permits, or trying to balance this question, we surveyed all 22 U.S. Ramsar sites.7 Although the the need to protect the aquatic environment without inappropri- results varied from site to site, we found that Ramsar designation ately limiting activities on private property. Other times interna- adds some value to all sites.
  • FIS Report Template May 2016 Draft

    FIS Report Template May 2016 Draft

    VOLUME 2 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV002A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
  • This Week in New Brunswick History

    This Week in New Brunswick History

    This Week in New Brunswick History In Fredericton, Lieutenant-Governor Sir Howard Douglas officially opens Kings January 1, 1829 College (University of New Brunswick), and the Old Arts building (Sir Howard Douglas Hall) – Canada’s oldest university building. The first Baptist seminary in New Brunswick is opened on York Street in January 1, 1836 Fredericton, with the Rev. Frederick W. Miles appointed Principal. Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) becomes responsible for all lines formerly January 1, 1912 operated by the Dominion Atlantic Railway (DAR) - according to a 999 year lease arrangement. January 1, 1952 The town of Dieppe is incorporated. January 1, 1958 The city of Campbellton and town of Shippagan become incorporated January 1, 1966 The city of Bathurst and town of Tracadie become incorporated. Louis B. Mayer, one of the founders of MGM Studios (Hollywood, California), January 2, 1904 leaves his family home in Saint John, destined for Boston (Massachusetts). New Brunswick is officially divided into eight counties of Saint John, Westmorland, Charlotte, Northumberland, King’s, Queen’s, York and Sunbury. January 3, 1786 Within each county a Shire Town is designated, and civil parishes are also established. The first meeting of the New Brunswick Legislature is held at the Mallard House January 3, 1786 on King Street in Saint John. The historic opening marks the official business of developing the new province of New Brunswick. Lévite Thériault is elected to the House of Assembly representing Victoria January 3, 1868 County. In 1871 he is appointed a Minister without Portfolio in the administration of the Honourable George L. Hatheway.
  • Natural Resources Chapter

    Natural Resources Chapter

    Natural Resources Chapter Comprehensive Plan Inventory & Analysis Adopted: May 20, 2006 Amended: November 5, 2013 November 6, 2007 Planning Board of York, Maine at time of chapter adoption: Glen MacWilliams, Chair Tom Manzi, Vice Chair Barrie Munro, Secretary Lee Corbin David Woods Lewis Stowe, Alternate ENACTMENT BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY Date of Town vote to enact this Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan: ______________. Certified by the Town Clerk: _________________________________ on ___________. (signature) (date) Comprehensive Plan – York, Maine TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 II. ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 3 A. A GIFT FROM THE ICE AGE ........................................................................................ 3 1. Physical Resources..................................................................................................... 3 2. The Water ..................................................................................................................... 3 3. The Air ........................................................................................................................... 4 4. Living Resources ......................................................................................................... 4 B. NATURAL RESOURCE VALUES WE ENJOY .........................................................
  • 50660 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

    50660 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

    50660 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 1997 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 6 supplement also provided detailed 1996±97 late-season frameworks. For information on the 1997±98 regulatory those topics where a Council Fish and Wildlife Service schedule and announced the Service recommendation is not shown, the Migratory Bird Regulations Committee Council supported continuing the same 50 CFR Part 20 and Flyway Council meetings. On June frameworks as in 1996±97. RIN 1018-AE14 27, 1997, the Service held a public hearing in Washington, DC, as General Migratory Bird Hunting; Final announced in the March 13 and June 6 Written Comments: The Humane Frameworks for Late-Season Migratory Federal Registers to review the status of Society of the United States (Humane Bird Hunting Regulations migratory shore and upland game birds. Society) expressed concern that the The Service discussed hunting public was not well represented in the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, regulations for these species and for regulations-development process and Interior. other early seasons. On July 23, 1997, requested establishment of a system ACTION: Final rule. the Service published in the Federal directly involving the non-hunting Register (62 FR 39712) a third public. In addition, they recommended SUMMARY: This rule prescribes final late- document. This document contained the that the Service undertake efforts to season frameworks from which States final regulatory alternatives for the obtain population estimates for all may select season dates, limits, and 1997±98 duck hunting season and the hunted species. Finally, they other options for the 1997±98 migratory proposed early-season frameworks for recommended pre-sunrise shooting be bird hunting season.
  • Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance

    Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance

    The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Ramsar Convention What Ramsar Is: Who can nominate a site stakeholders associated with the proposed site greatly contribute to • In 1971, an international convention • Any local government, group, the nomination process; and was held in Ramsar, Iran and community, private organization, participants signed a treaty entitled, or landowner can nominate a A completed Ramsar Information “The Convention on Wetlands of site for inclusion on the Ramsar Sheet, is available online at http://bit. International Importance, Especially List of Wetlands of International ly/1HIU7PR as Waterfowl Habitat.” Importance. The Federal government can also nominate sites, such as Nine Criteria for “Wetlands • The Ramsar Convention provides a National Parks, National Forests, or of International Importance” framework for voluntary international National Wildlife Refuges. Designation: cooperation for wetland conservation. A wetland should be considered • A written agreement is required internationally important if it meets • The U.S. acceded to the Ramsar from all landowners and a Member Convention April 18, 1987. any one of the following criteria. The of Congress representing the site: geographic area. What Ramsar Does: 1. contains a representative, rare, • Recognizes wetlands’ importance to Nomination package or unique example of a natural communities, cultures, governments, The petitioner must submit a complete or near-natural wetland type and businesses and encourages nomination package to the Director, found within the appropriate wetland conservation and wise use of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), biogeographic region; or wetlands. 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006, with a copy to the Global 2. supports vulnerable, endangered, • Establishes criteria for designating Program, Division of International or critically endangered species rivers, marshes, coral reefs and other Conservation, FWS.