ISSUE BRIEF ISSUE Medicar General Ankle Care – Is a Covered Benefit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISSUE BRIEF ISSUE Medicar General Ankle Care – Is a Covered Benefit ISSUE BRIEF The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physicians Under Medicaid Act Request • Medicare-eligible patients with diabetes seen by a podiatrist had a 23-percent lower risk of amputation and a 9-percent lower The American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) requests you co- risk of hospitalization compared with those not seen by a podia- sponsor “The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physicians Under Med- trist; icaid Act,” soon to be introduced by U.S. Reps. Lee Terry (R-NE) and • For the general population, each dollar invested in care by a Diana DeGette (D-CO), and U.S. Sens. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and podiatrist results in up to $51 of savings; Charles Grassley (R-IA). • For the Medicare-eligible population, each dollar invested in care by a podiatrist results in up to $13 of savings. Problem The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physicians Under Medicaid Act The current Medicaid (Title XIX) statute covers physician services, in- Treatment costs for diabetic foot ulcers range between $7,439 and cluding in most cases medical and surgical care of the foot and ankle. $20,622 per episode. Estimated costs for a limb amputation are However, the definition of a physician is limited to care provided by a $70,434, and can cost as much as $500,000 over a lifetime. The po- medical doctor (MD) or doctor of osteopathy (DO) as defined in 1861(r) tential and very significant cost savings of ensuring access to podiatric (1) of the Social Security Act (SSA). physicians in all sectors of the health care system—including Medic- aid—cannot be disregarded. “Podiatric Services,” which are not specifically defined in Medicaid (Title XIX) but are presumed to mean services provided by a Doctor of Po- diatric Medicine (DPM), are considered optional, despite the fact that Strong Bipartisan & Outside Support podiatric physicians are educated, trained, and licensed to perform the Removing barriers for patient access to podiatric physicians has en- same foot and ankle care services as MDs and DOs. Doctors of po- joyed strong bipartisan support in Congress, with bill language previ- diatric medicine have been defined in the Medicare statute [1861(r)(3), ously garnering 32 Senate cosponsors and 220 House cosponsors. SSA] as physicians for more than 40 years and are covered as provid- It was included in the Senate Finance Committee’s initial Chairman’s ers in nearly all other federal health programs, including TRICARE, the mark of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 and in one of the major Veterans Health Administration (VA), and the Indian Health Service. health reform proposals in 2009. It is also supported by a diverse group of health-care stakeholders including the American Osteopathic Asso- Background ciation and the American Public Health Association. Essential medical and surgical foot and ankle care is covered as a benefit by Medicaid programs in all 50 states and the District of Cost Columbia, but it is not always covered when provided by a Doctor of The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) provided an estimate of the bill Podiatric Medicine. Current law effectively limits Medicaid beneficiaries’ in 2009. However, the estimate must be revisited since the assump- access to the quality, cost-effective services provided by podiatrists tions used at the time have changed. The previous estimate was $200 and discriminates against the type of licensed medical professional million over ten years, but did not examine savings that would result Medicaid patients might see for foot and ankle care. from the avoidance of unnecessary hospitalization or prevention of low- er extremity amputations and assumed a greatly expanded Medicaid- The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physicians Under Medicaid Act eligible population. would save lives, limbs, and money for the Medicaid program—for both states and the federal government. A higher-than-average per- centage of Medicaid beneficiaries are at risk for diabetes and related lower limb complications. Thomson Reuters, which provides industry expertise and critical in- Current Medicaid may deny patient access to formation to decision makers in financial, legal, tax and accounting, the licensed and credentialed medical and surgical and health-care areas, conducted a three year study (accessible at: specialty care provided by podiatric physicians, www.tinyurl.com/trstudy) that arrived at, among others, the following conclusions: even though the care they provide – foot and • Patients with diabetes in the general population seen by a podia- ankle care – is a covered benefit. trist prior to a foot ulcer diagnosis had a 20-percent lower risk of amputation and a 26-percent lower risk of hospitalization than those not seen by a podiatrist; Prepared by the American Podiatric Medical Association, 9312 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-581-9200, www.apma.org. Contact [email protected] with questions. ISSUE BRIEF The Majority of Foot/Ankle Care in the U.S. is The Majority of Foot/Ankle Care in the U.S. is Performed by Podiatric Physicians but Medicaid Patients May Not Have Access The Majority of Foot/Ankle Care Performed by Podiatric Physicians but Medicaid Patients May Not Have Access For foot and ankle issues, most Americans seek out Whenever public or private health insurance programs specialists for their care, typically a Doctor of Podiat- preclude patient access to podiatric physicians, there are ric Medicine, an orthopedist, or other physician. The adverse impacts on our health-care delivery system: majority of medical care of the foot and ankle is performed by podiatrists. 1. Costs increase by driving patients to a more expen- sive point of service (e.g., hospital emergency rooms) Even though foot and ankle care is generally a covered for the same services. benefit under Medicaid, the program currently teases out 2. It exacerbates America’s growing physician shortage a separate podiatry benefit as being “optional” for pa- by not appropriately utilizing the full range of physi- tients, focusing on the provider of services, rather than cian specialists. ensuring coverage of medically necessary care regard- less of the qualified professional furnishing such care. 3. It denies patients the option of seeing the physicians Thus, Medicaid effectively discriminates and can arbitrari- who are best trained for the foot and ankle care ly preclude patient access to a licensed and credentialed they seek. specialized physician class even though the services they provide—foot and ankle care—are a covered benefit. COMMON FOOT & ANKLE PROBLEMS TREATED BY PHYSICIANS Amputation of Toe Ankle Fractur e Open Fi x PODIATRI C Bunion Surger y PHYSICIAN Hammertoe Repai r ORTHOPEDI S T ALL OTHER Metatarsal Fractur e Open Fi x Remove Ingr own Nail Repair Achilles T endon Ulcer Debridement 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100% Source: Thomson Reuters Market Scan survey data for 2010 commercial health insurance claims Prepared by the American Podiatric Medical Association, 9312 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-581-9200, www.apma.org. Contact [email protected] with questions. ISSUE BRIEF Estimate of (CBO) Should Revisit pre-PPACA Budget Office The Congressional The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Should Revisit pre-PPACA Estimate of The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physicians Under Medicaid Act In 2009, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) scored ling 2011 study conducted by Thomson Reuters Health- HR 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, care (published in the Journal of the American Podiatric as introduced. The estimate included a budgetary impact Medical Association1), which compared outcomes of care analysis of The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physi- for patients with diabetes treated by podiatrists versus cians Under Medicaid Act—which would define podia- care by other health care professionals and physicians: trists as “physicians” under Medicaid—indicating as part of a larger budgetary table that the legislation related to • Among patients with commercial insurance, a sav- podiatrists would increase federal spending by $200 ings of $19,686 per patient with diabetes can be re- million over 10 years. alized over a three-year period if there is at least one visit to a podiatrist in the year preceding a diabetic APMA believes the federal budgetary impact of defin- ulceration. Among patients with commercial insur- ing podiatrists as physicians under Medicaid would ance, each $1 invested in care by a podiatrist re- be significantly lower under a new CBO analysis due sults in $27 to $51 of savings for the health-care to recent changes to Medicaid coverage which would af- delivery system. fect scoring assumptions. • Among Medicare-eligible patients, a savings of • Expansion population is smaller—The House leg- $4,271 per patient with diabetes can be realized islation upon which the 2009 CBO estimate was over a three-year period if there is at least one based called for the expansion of Medicaid to all in- visit to a podiatrist in the year preceding ulcer- dividuals under age 65 (children, pregnant women, ation. Among Medicare eligible patients, each $1 parents, and adults without dependent children) with invested in care by a podiatrist results in $9 incomes up to 150 percent of the Federal Poverty to $13 of savings. The Equity and Access for Podiatric Physicians Under Medicaid Act Level (FPL). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) as enact- ed into law stipulates a reduced Medicaid expansion Conservatively projected, these per-patient numbers only to 133 percent of FPL. support an estimated $10.5 billion in savings over three years if every at-risk patient with diabetes sees a • Expansion is optional—Additionally, based on the podiatrist at least one time in the year preceding the on- Supreme Court’s ACA ruling that the statute’s Med- set of a foot ulcer. icaid program expansion must be optional for states, CBO projects that about 6 million fewer people will be enrolled in Medicaid.
Recommended publications
  • Policy Guide
    Policy Guide July 2007 #&9Ab`SSb<EAcWbS"jEOaVW\Ub]\21 # BSZ $!&# $j4Of $!&"$$" eeeS\RV][SZSaa\Saa]`U Table of Contents Introduction The introduction includes two new features. What We Know About Housing and Homelessness is a summary of important data regarding housing and homelessness. The Homelessness Budget summarizes Federal funding for targeted homelessness programs. The section also describes the Alliance’s policy priorities for this year. The Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness........................................................................... 3 What We Know About Housing and Homelessness............................................................ 5 Policy Priorities ................................................................................................................ 7 The Homelessness Budget ............................................................................................... 9 Issue Briefs The issue briefs describe the policy environment for different homelessness topics and the major legislation that could affect them. Family Homelessness ..................................................................................................... 11 Chronic Homelessness ................................................................................................... 14 Homeless Youth ............................................................................................................ 16 Rural Homelessness ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Citizens in a Changing World
    Summer 2016 No. 17 In this issue: Faith & Citizenship Initiative Projects 2 Christian Citizens in a Changing World If a body politic is only as good as its citizens, Calvin College’s theological traditions, with an School Choice Policy then what does it mean to say that a citizen is emphasis on the importance of (rather than and Private Education 3 “good”? This is the key question behind the Faith aversion to) public life and the focus on distinctive and Citizenship Initiative at Calvin College, roles Christians play in the world, is a seedbed for Challenges for which is spearheaded by the Henry Institute with ideas about citizen formation and education. There the Next President 4 the support of the Provost’s Office, the Center for is a special need to reach young people in North Series Christian Worship, and the Byker Chair. America and abroad, and to engage the global The question of good citizenship is age-old, church in a robust discussion about how Christians Faithful Citizens 5 but never more urgent than today. In just the past ought to fulfill their role as citizens, with special Seminar three decades, new forces and movements have emphasis on the opportunities to learn and mobilize Faith and Citzenship challenged the role of the citizen. Individuals are across national borders. buffeted by globalization and rapid technological Further, within the contexts of considering Lab 6 change, shifting international alliances and appropriate roles as citizens, Christians are Symposium on hardening transnational conflicts, and intergroup Religion and 7 hostilities. But they also confront these new One might plausibly argue that the Public Life realities in their particular territories and cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
    [Show full text]
  • Print Journalism's Framing of Female Candidates in The
    Joining the World of Journals Welcome to the nation’s first and, to our knowledge, only undergraduate research journal in communi- cations. We discovered this fact while perusing the Web site of the Council on Undergraduate Research, which lists and links to the 60 or so undergraduate research journals nationwide (http://www.cur.org/ugjournal. html). Some of these journals focus on a discipline (e.g., Journal of Undergraduate Research in Physics), some are university-based and multidisciplinary (e.g., MIT Undergraduate Research Journal), and some are university-based and disciplinary (e.g., Furman University Electronic Journal in Undergraduate Mathematics). The Elon Journal is the first to focus on undergraduate research in journalism, media and communi- cations. The School of Communications at Elon University is the creator and publisher of the online journal. The second issue was published in Fall 2010 under the editorship of Dr. Byung Lee, associate professor in the School of Communications. The three purposes of the journal are: • To publish the best undergraduate research in Elon’s School of Communications each term, • To serve as a repository for quality work to benefit future students seeking models for how to do undergraduate research well, and • To advance the university’s priority to emphasize undergraduate student research. The Elon Journal is published twice a year, with spring and fall issues. Articles and other materials in the journal may be freely downloaded, reproduced and redistributed without permission as long as the author and source are properly cited. Student authors retain copyright own- ership of their works. Celebrating Student Research This journal reflects what we enjoy seeing in our students -- intellectual maturing.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Handout As an Adobe Acrobat
    AEI Election Watch 2006 October 11, 2006 Bush’s Ratings Congress’s Ratings Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 39 56 CNN/ORC Oct. 6-8 28 63 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 37 59 Gallup/USAT Oct. 6-8 24 68 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 39 60 ABC/WP Oct. 5-8 32 66 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 34 60 CBS/NYT Oct. 5-8 27 64 Newsweek Oct. 5-6 33 59 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 31 57 Time/SRBI Oct. 3-4 36 57 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 27 69 AP/Ipsos Oct. 2-4 38 59 Diag.-Hotline Sep. 24-26 28 65 PSRA/Pew Sep. 21-Oct. 4 37 53 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 30 57 NBC/WSJ Sep. 30-Oct. 2 39 56 Fox/OD Sep. 12-13 29 53 Fox/OD Sep. 26-27 42 54 NBC/WSJ (RV) Sep. 8-11 20 65 Diag-Hotline Sep. 24-26 42 56 LAT/Bloom Sep. 16-19 45 52 Final October approval rating for the president and Final October approval rating for Congress and number of House seats won/lost by the president’s number of House seats won/lost by the president’s party party Gallup/CNN/USA Today Gallup/CNN/USA Today Number Number Approve of seats Approve of seats Oct. 2002 67 +8 Oct. 2002 50 +8 Oct. 1998 65 +5 Oct. 1998 44 +5 Oct. 1994 48 -52 Oct. 1994 23 -52 Oct. 1990 48 -9 Oct. 1990 24 -9 Oct. 1986 62 -5 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-Annual-Report.Pdf
    American Association of Physics Teachers 2017 ANNUAL REPORT EXECUTIVE BOARD PRESIDENT George Amann Rhinebeck, NY PRESIDENT-ELECT Gordon P. Ramsey Loyola University Chicago, IL VICE PRESIDENT 2017 in Review Mel Sabella Chicago State University P RESIDENT ’ S 2017 R E P ORT Chicago, IL George A. Amann ....................1 SECRETARY Wolfgang Christian E XECUTIVE O FFICER ’ S 2017 A NNUA L R E P ORT Davidson College Davidson, NC Beth A. Cunningham..................2 TREASURER R. Steven Turley P UBLIC ATIONS . 4 Brigham Young University Provo, UT E LECTRONIC C OMMUNIC ATIONS . 6 PAST PRESIDENT Janelle M. Bailey N ATION A L M EETINGS . 9 Temple University Philadelphia, PA CHAIR OF SECTION W ORKSHO P S A ND P ROGR A MS . 13 REPRESENTATIVES Dyan Jones Mercyhurs Univeristy 2017 H IGH S CHOOL P HYSICS P HOTO C ONTEST . 15 Erie, PA OLL A BOR ATIVE ROJECTS VICE CHAIR OF SECTION C P . 16 REPRESENTATIVES David Strum 2017 A wa RDS A ND G R A NTS . 18 Univeristy of Maine Orono, ME M EMBERSHI P . 23 AT-LARGE BOARD MEMBERS Daniel M. Crowe Loudoun Academy of Science F UNDR A ISING . 24 Sterlineg VA Karen Jo Matsler C OMMITTEE C ONTRIBUTIONS . 26 University of Texas-Arlington Arlington, TX Sherry L. Savrda 2017 A RE A C OMMITTEES . 26 Seminole State College Sanford, FL 2017 A DVISORY C OMMITTEES . 28 EDITOR AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS AAPT S ECTION R E P RESENTATIVES . 30 David P. Jackson Dickinson College F IN A NCI A LS . 31 Carlisle, PA EDITOR N EMORI A M THE PHYSICS TEACHER 2017 I M .
    [Show full text]
  • December 11, 2006 New Congress Brings with It Religious Firsts By
    December 11, 2006 New Congress Brings With It Religious Firsts by Jonathan Tilove Religion News Service The new Congress will, for the first time, include a Muslim, two Buddhists, more Jews than Episcopalians, and the highest-ranking Mormon in congressional history. Roman Catholics remain the largest single faith group in Congress, accounting for 29 percent of all members of the House and Senate, followed by Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, Jews and Episcopalians. While Catholics in Congress are nearly 2-to-1 Democrats, the most lopsidedly Democratic groups are Jews and those not affiliated with any religion. Of the 43 Jewish members of Congress, there is only one Jewish Republican in the House and two in the Senate. The six religiously unaffiliated members of the House are all Democrats. The most Republican groups are the small band of Christian Scientists in the House (all five are Republican), and members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (12 Republicans and three Democrats) -- though the top-ranking Mormon in the history of Congress will be Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, the incoming Democratic majority leader. Baptists divide along partisan lines defined by race. Black Baptists, like all black members of Congress, are Democrats, while most white Baptists are Republicans. Notable exceptions include incoming House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., who will serve as president pro tem in the new Senate, making him third in succession to the presidency after the vice president and House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. Because 2006 was such a good year for Democrats, they have regained their commanding advantage among Catholics, which had slipped during an era of GOP dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress of the United States Washington, DC 20515
    Congress of the United States Washington, DC 20515 April 3, 2009 The Honorable Barack Obama President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. President: Vital U.S. interests in North Africa are increasingly challenged by growing regional instability. Terrorist incidents in the Maghreb have increased by more than 400 percent since September 11, 2001, and the emergence of Al Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) has led to a spike in terror attacks against both symbols of national government and institutions reflecting cooperation between the Arab world and the West. The single greatest obstacle impeding the security cooperation necessary to combat this transnational threat is the unresolved territorial dispute over the Western Sahara. In addition to bringing peace to the people of Morocco and to the Saharawi, and shrinking the space for global terrorist elements to recruit and operate, resolving the conflict in the Western Sahara would have considerable economic benefits and improve the lives of millions of Africans. The entire Maghreb would finally be free to pursue serious economic integration, attract increased foreign investment, and realize the potential for regional trade and cooperation. All of these important goals are currently blocked by the continued conflict and the tension it creates between states in the region. In 2007, at the urging of the United States and the United Nations, Morocco , our oldest ally and partner for peace in the Middle East, initiated a ground-breaking autonomy plan to resolve the more than 30 year-old conflict within the framework of self-determination for the Western Sahara .
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES—Wednesday, January 12, 2011
    262 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE, Vol. 157, Pt. 1 January 12, 2011 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—Wednesday, January 12, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. and was (1) COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE.—Mr. Good- Mr. PASTOR of Arizona. I object. I called to order by the Speaker. latte, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. King of would like to have the resolution read, Iowa, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Conaway, Mr. f if possible. Fortenberry, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Thompson of The SPEAKER pro tempore. Objec- PRAYER Pennsylvania, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. tion is heard. The Chaplain, the Reverend Daniel P. Fincher, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Southerland, Mr. The Clerk will report the resolution. Coughlin, offered the following prayer: Crawford, Mrs. Roby, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Mr. PASTOR from Arizona. I with- With the psalmist, we pray for this DesJarlais, Mrs. Ellmers, Mr. Gibson, Mr. draw the objection. Congress and the Nation: Hultgren, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Schilling, and The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there ‘‘Come, let us bless the Lord at all Mr. Ribble. objection to the request of the gen- (2) COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES.—Mr. times. Let praise always be on our lips. tleman from Texas? Bartlett, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Jones, Mr. There was no objection. If the Lord is your boast, be humble, Akin, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. listen and be moved. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. The resolution was agreed to. Glorify the Lord with me. Together Turner, Mr. Kline, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, A motion to reconsider was laid on let us reverence the Holy Name.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Election Dates
    SPECIAL ELECTIONS Updated by: Eileen Leamon, 6/02/2021 FEC Public Records Branch / Public Disclosure and Media Relations Division Key: * seat switched parties/- died in office STATE DATE SEAT VACATED BY WINNER 1973 AK/AL 3/06 Al Nick Begich (D)- Don Young (R)* LA/02 3/20** Hale Boggs (D)- Lindy Boggs (D) IL/07 6/05 George W. Collins (D)- Cardiss Collins (D) MD/01 8/21 William O. Mills (R)- Robert E. Bauman (R) 1974 PA/12 2/05 John P. Saylor (R)- John P. Murtha (D)* MI/05 2/18 Gerald R. Ford (R) Richard F. VanderVeen (D)* CA/13 3/05 Charles M. Teague (R)- Robert J. Lagomarsino (R) OH/01 3/05 William J. Keating (R) Thomas A. Luken (D)* MI/08 4/16 James Harvey (R) Bob Traxler (D)* CA/06 6/04 William Mailliard (R) John L. Burton (D)* 1975 CA/37 4/29 Jerry L. Pettis (R)- Shirley N. Pettis (R) IL/05 7/08 John C. Kluczynski (D)- John G. Fary (D) LA/06# 1/07 W. Henson Moore, III (R) NH/S## 9/16 Norris Cotton (R) John A. Durkin (D)* TN/05 11/25 Richard Fulton (D) Clifford Allen (D) # Special election was a court-ordered rerun after it was found impossible to determine who won the 1974 general election (voting machine malfunction) between Moore and Jeff LaCaze (D). ## 1974 general election between Durkin and Louis Wyman (R) for the open Senate seat was too close to call and the Senate refused to seat either candidate. Special election was held in September 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Featuring: RENEE ELLMERS TOM MARINO TIM WALBERG VICKY HARTZLER LOU BARLETTA TIM GRIFFIN ALLEN WEST ALAN NUNNELEE RAUL LABRADOR SANDY ADAMS and MORE!
    IN FOCUS FEATURING: RENEE ELLMERS TOM MARINO TIM WALBERG VICKY HARTZLER LOU BARLETTA TIM GRIFFIN ALLEN WEST ALAN NUNNELEE RAUL LABRADOR SANDY ADAMS AND MORE! A project of People For the American Way WWW.pfaw.ORG WWW.RIGHTWINGwaTCH.ORG Introduction NORTH CAROLINA Reaping the rewards of anti-incumbent sentiment, Republicans Renee Ellmers made enormous gains in the House of Representatives in the 2010 elections. While the majority of Americans agree that the vote was no mandate for the Republicans’ agenda, the new GOP House leadership, empowered by the most far-right Freshman Class since 1994, is nevertheless looking to impose a radical agenda. The House GOP’s Freshman Class provides an extreme far-right backbone for the GOP’s agenda—many newly-elected members based their campaigns on propagating anti-government extremism, appealing to bizarre and debunked conspiracy theories, denigrating gays, immigrants, and Muslims, and pledging to repeal multiple amendments of the U.S. Constitution. In this profile of the “Ten Scariest Republicans Heading to Congress,” People For the American Way looks into newly elected members of the House, from Tea Party all-star Allen West to anti-gay activist Vicky Hartzler to Bush-crony Tim Griffin. The “Ten Scariest” include incoming congressmen who have been clouded by ethics scandals, lied about health care reform, and have ties to extremist groups. Among the ten, all share rapidly anti-choice and anti-equality views, enthusiastic support from the Religious Right, and reactionary economic ideas. Now, as members of the new GOP majority, the radical Freshman Class will have significant clout to promote Tea Tea Party activist Renee Ellmers defeated Democratic Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Signs for GOP in New Batch of Polls from Key House Districts
    Insight Good Signs for GOP in New Batch of Polls From Key House Districts AUGUST 16, 2010 From National Review Online: The Campaign Spot By Jim Geraghty Whit Ayres, Jon McHenry, and Dan Judy just completed a series of polls in twelve key congressional districts on the East Coast. (Another two batches of polls in the near future will look at key races in the heartland and West Coast.) Their polls, conducted for American Action Forum on July 28, 29, 31, and August 1, with 4,800 likely general- election voters — 400 each in Connecticut’s 4th and 5th districts, Florida’s 24th district, New York’s 20th, 23rd and 25th districts; Pennsylvania’s 3rd, 10th, 11th, and 12th districts; Virginia’s 5th district; and West Virginia’s 3rd district — show competitive races throughout the East. In aggregate, they find 35 percent of the voters in these districts say their representative deserves reelection while 52 percent say it is time for someone else. They report: Beyond the deserves reelection figure, the key results from the surveys are: 1. Voters say the country is on the wrong track by a nearly three-to-one margin. Sixty-eight percent of the likely voters in these districts say the country is off on the wrong track, while just 24 percent say the country is heading in the right direction. 2. The economy is the most important issue in a top-of-mind measure, while controlling government spending and making Washington, DC accountable are also important in a closed-ended question. Forty-eight percent of voters say the economy is the most important issue facing the country in an open-ended question.
    [Show full text]