Assessment of the Extent and Prevalence of Serial Murder Through Criminological Theories
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sociology and Anthropology 2(3): 116-124, 2014 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/sa.2014.020307 Assessment of the Extent and Prevalence of Serial Murder through Criminological Theories Kwan Choi1, Ju-Lak Lee2,* 1Department of Police Administration, Hansei University, Gunpo, 604-5, Kyunggido, Korea 2Department of Security Management, Kyonggi University, Suwon, 443-760, Kyunggido, Korea *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright © 2014 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract The purpose of this paper is to attempt an expand upon the fundamental classifications of murder. assessment of the extent and prevalence of serial murder The classification scheme adopted by the FBI in America through possible criminological theories. Each of the main when dealing with homicide categorises by type and style: theories is discussed to evaluate whether a successful “A single homicide is one victim, one homicidal event; explanation for serial killing can be provided. For the double homicide is two victims, one event, and in one purpose of this piece of work we have concentrated location; and a triple homicide has three victims in one primarily on America as it has the highest rate of serial location during one event. Anything beyond three victims is killings and hence they have produced most of the research classified as a mass murder - that is, a homicide involving into this subject area. Britain is following America's four or more victims in one location, and within one event example; investigative techniques and the development of a [1].” profiling system. There are four parts for better This paper sets out to examine whether it is possible to understanding and exploration in terms of an assessment of ascertain the true extent and prevalence of serial murder and the serial murder. First part looks at the legal definitions of aims to assess the main theoretical explanations of the murder, the categorisation of types of multiple murder and aetiology of serial murder. Each of the main theories is the common elements within serial murder. In second part discussed to evaluate whether a successful explanation for various definitions of serial murder are examined and the serial killing can be provided. many differing typologies of serial killers are looked at. For the purpose of present paper, it concentrates primarily Third part addresses the historical and modern-day extent of on the America as it has the highest rate of serial killings and serial murder and questions the validity of research into its hence they have produced most of the research into this current prevalence. The discussions are that biological, subject area. Britain is following America’s example as psychiatric, psychological, and sociological theories are regards investigative techniques and the development of a discussed and their applicability to the existence of serial profiling system. The paper explores the general standard of murder evaluated. At the end of present paper, a serial murderers to explain, assess and understand by multi-dimensional model of the serial killer is described. researchers through the possible criminological theories. Research methods selected by us, for this paper, is literature Keywords Assessment, Extent, Prevalence, Serial reviews. The paper further argues in terms of the aspect of Murder, Criminological Theories critical points about criminological explanation of serial murderers. 1. Introduction 2. Legal Classifications and General In English Law there are two major classifications of Characteristics of Serial Murder unlawful killing: murder and manslaughter. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines murder as “the unlawful 2.1. Types of Multiple Murders premeditated killing of a human being by another”, manslaughter being the taking of another’s life without There is a general consensus among academics and law malice aforethought. enforcement professionals that multiple murder can be Murder in general ordinarily implies the involvement of separated into three main forms: mass murder, spree murder one murderer and one victim. However, in cases of multicide and serial murder. Firstly, mass murder can be further where more than one victim is involved, it is necessary to subdivided into categories: classic and family. The taking of Sociology and Anthropology 2(3): 116-124, 2014 117 a number of lives (at least three) by an individual in a short mass murderers could pertain to a serial murderer, and some space of time in the same location is termed classic mass serial offenders are more adequately suited to the traits of a murder. An example of a classic mass murderer is James mass murderer. Huberty, who killed 21 people and wounded 19 in a fast food restaurant in California in 1984, before being shot by a 2.2. Common Elements within Serial Murder SWAT team [2]. Family mass murder is committed when an offender kills four or more members of his/her own family. Holmes and DeBurger put forward five fundamental Jeremy Bamber who in 1985 killed his father, mother, sister elements which all serial murders have in common [5]: and her two children in order to collect inheritance money is About section 1 in Table 1, the serial killer will not cease an example of this type of murderer. until he is prevented from committing more crimes by either Secondly, a spree murder involves the slaying of three of capture or death. His activities may continue for a more people in at least two locations within a short period of considerable length of time. About section 2, one victim time. This offence is usually accompanied by another crime, reduces the chance of victim escape. The offender is not predominantly robbery. The murder on impulse does little to likely to be willing to share the pleasure of the kill with escape detection. The spree murderer is unlikely to re-offend others. However, there are exceptions to this with the as many do not survive; there is a high likelihood of suicide existence of ‘team killers’ who kill together such as Bianchi or being shot by the police. With spree murder there is no and Buono, the ‘Hillside Stranglers’. About section 3, their ‘cooling off period’ between each killing [3]. An example of attacks are motiveless and the serial murderer often shows a a spree murderer is Michael Ryan who murdered 16 people lack of regret for the suffering caused. About section 4, serial in 1987. After killing a female he drove to another location crimes are not victim-orientated and the victims have no and shot at a petrol station attendant. He then travelled to control in the situation. About section 5, Egger argued that another town in close proximity, e.g. Hungerford, where he the motive is generally not for material gain but is usually a indiscriminately killed the rest of his victims, before compulsive act specifically for gratification based on committing suicide. fantasies. The key element is that the series of murders do not Thirdly, serial killing involves the taking of three or more share in the events surrounding one [6]. These ‘motiveless’ lives on separate occasions usually over a long period of time. acts make detection by the police difficult, and connections The serial murder adopts a repetitive cycle and there is a between murders at times do not become clear until the killer ‘cooling off period’ between each murder. The murders are is captured. premeditated and specific types of victim are chosen. Serial Lane and Gregg offer two additional characteristics which murderers have no relationship to their victims and they distinguish serial killing from other types of multiple rarely commit suicide [2]. An example of this type of murder murders [7]: is John Wayne Gacy, who between 1975 and 1978 sexually Table 2. Two additional distinguish serial killing styles from other types of assaulted, tortured and murdered 33 boys and young men and multiple murder then buried them in the crawlspace under his house. Gacy was sentenced to death in 1980 and was eventually executed Section C o n t e n t s by lethal injection [3]. In an increasingly mobile society the serial killer can leave the Table 1. Five fundamental elements in serial murders 1 town where the crime was committed before the murder is noticed. Section C o n t e n t s During a serial murder high levels of violence or overkill are 2 often inflicted upon the victim. The central characteristic of serial killing is the frequency and 1 repetitiveness of the murders. About section 1 in Table 2, the serial killer can travel Ordinarily, serial crimes are one-on-one due to the safety between towns with ease this is particularly the case in the 2 aspect in that there is less likelihood the serial murderer will United States, comparisons between murders will therefore be discovered. not be noticed until precise patterns arise. About section 2, as Serial murderers tend to concentrate on victims with whom the motivation for the serial murderer is the act of killing 3 they have no relationship, hence the term 'stranger-to-stranger' killings. itself, the feelings of pleasure can be prolonged by torturing The motivation to kill present in the serial killer is unlike the victim over a lengthy period of time and overkill may 4 motives in traditional criminal acts of passion. also be adopted. Serial killers show no clear modus operandi or motive for their Other typical traits of serial murderers include the age 5 acts. group to which the majority of murderers belong, generally 25 to 35 years. Most serial killers appear to be unobtrusive, Some researchers have pointed out there are complications seemingly ‘normal’ members of society, they show no age within the categorisation of types multiple homicide preference towards victims though they tend to prey on [2][3][4]. There sometimes exists a degree of merging or vulnerable groups.