Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 26 Article 4 Issue 3 Spring 1995 1995 On Crime, Criminal Lawyers, and O.J. Simpson: Plato's Grogias Revisited George Anastaplo Prof. of Law, Loyola University Chicago, School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation George Anastaplo, On Crime, Criminal Lawyers, and O.J. Simpson: Plato's Grogias Revisited, 26 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 455 (1995). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol26/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Lecture On Crime, Criminal Lawyers, and O.J. Simpson: Plato's GorgiasRevisited* George Anastaplo* Socrates: . The evildoer will be happy, will he not, if he meets with justice and punishment? Polus: Decidedly not. Under those conditions he would be most unhappy. Socrates: Then according to you, if the evildoer is not punished, he will be happy? Polus: That is what I say. Socrates: But according to my opinion, Polus, the wicked man and the doer of evil is in any case unhappy, but more unhappy if he does not meet with justice and suffer punishment, less unhappy if he pays the penalty and suffers punishment from gods and men. Polus: That is a preposterous theory you are attempting to uphold, Socrates. -Plato' I. Critical to any serious inquiry about world organizations and inter- national understanding have been, as we have seen this month here in Rome,2 questions about how different "cultures" approach vital moral issues that can shape relations between communities as well as bet- ween human beings.