Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art Volume 41 Number 1 Article 14 2021 Fables Agreed Upon:A Comparative Study of New Historicism and Alternate History Feng Li
[email protected] Yitzhak Lewis
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tsla.researchcommons.org/journal Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, and the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Li Feng Yitzhak Lewis. Fables Agreed Upon: A Comparative Study of New Historicism and Alternate History. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2021, 42(1): 150-166. This Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Theoretical Studies in Literature and Arts. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art by an authorized editor of Theoretical Studies in Literature and Arts. Fables Agreed Upon: A Comparative Study of New Historicism and Alternate History Li Feng Yitzhak Lewis Abstract: New Historicism and alternate history raise similar questions regarding history and ideology. New Historicism reads every text as an alternate history narrative,while the narrative mode in alternate history can inspire a nuanced understanding of the critical positions promoted by New Historicism. The paper offers a comparative study of the two in terms of their conceptualizations of historical narrative,intertextuality,narrativity,non-linear structure and spatiality. It seeks to create dialogues between different voices in both the critical theory and the literary genre with respect to their