Utah's Right Turn

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Utah's Right Turn UTAH'UTAH'SS RIGHRIGHTT TURN: REPUBLICAREPUBLICANN ASCENDANCYASCENDANCY AND THTHEE 19719766 U.SU.S.. SENATSENATEE RACRACEE byby JaJayy LoganLogan RogersRogers A thesithesiss submittedsubmitted ttoo ththee facultyfaculty ofof TheThe UniversityUniversity ofof UtahUtah inin partialpartial fulfillmentfulfillment ofof thethe requirementrequirement forfor thethe degreedegree ofof MasterMaster ofof ArtsArts DepartmentDepartment ofof HistoryHistory TheThe UniversityUniversity ofof UtahUtah MayMay 20082008 CopyrightCopyright ©© JayJay LoganLogan RogersRogers 20082008 AllAll RightsRights ReservedReserved THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Jay Rogers This thesis has been read by each member of the following supervisory committee and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. Chair: W. Paul Reeve 3-JI-IJr' THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL FINAL READING APPROVAL To the Graduate Council of the University ofUtah: I have read the thesis of Jay Rogers in its final form and have found that (l) its format, citations, and bibliographic style are consistent and acceptable; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the supervisory committee and is ready for submission to The GraduateSchool. ��/{-OS Date W. PaulReeve Chair: SupervisoryCommittee Approved for the Major Department Eric Htnderaker Chair/Dean Approved for the Graduate Council DavidS. Chapma Dean of The GraduateSchool ABSTRACTABSTRACT ThisThis thesisthesis examinesexamines thethe 19761976 UnitedUnited StatesStates SenateSenate racracee inin UtahUtah,, inin whicwhichh RepublicanRepublican OrrinOrrin Hatch,Hatch, a politicalpolitical novice,novice, defeateddefeated three-terthree-termm incumbentincumbent DemocraticDemocratic SenatorSenator FrankFrank Moss.Moss. ItIt exploresexplores Hatch'sHatch's victoryvictory asas parpartt ofof a statewidestatewide politicapoliticall shiftshift iinn favorfavor ofof conservativeconservative RepublicansRepublicans andand positionspositions UtahUtah asas a bellwethebellwetherr statestate atat ththee frontfront of of a broaderbroader regionalregional andand nationalnational shiftshift toto thethe right.right. DuringDuring thethe 1970s,1970s, leadersleaders ofof thethe majoritymajority religionreligion inin Utah,Utah, thethe ChurchChurch ofof JesusJesus ChristChrist ofof Latter-daLatter-dayy Saints,Saints, becambecamee increasinglyincreasingly outspokenoutspoken inin favorfavor ofof conservativeconservative positionspositions oonn socialsocial issueissuess suchsuch aass abortionabortion andand thethe EqualEqual RightsRights Amendment.Amendment. TheyThey expressedexpressed alaralarmm oveoverr ththee culturaculturall changeschanges associatedassociated withwith thethe liberalismliberalism thatthat emergedemerged ououtt ofof ththee 1960s.1960s. ThesThesee concernconcernss combinedcombined withwith a longstandinglongstanding distrustdistrust ofof federalfederal powerpower amongamong Utah'Utah'ss population,population, movingmoving thethe state'sstate's Latter-dayLatter-day SaintSaint (LDS)(LDS) votersvoters intointo ththee RepublicaRepublicann PartPartyy coalitioncoalition.. HatchHatch benefitedbenefited fromfrom thethe LDSLDS people'speople's skepticismskepticism towartowardd relativelrelativelyy liberaliberall DemocratsDemocrats suchsuch asas SenatorSenator Moss.Moss. TheThe RepublicanRepublican challengechallengerr portrayeportrayedd himselhimselff aass a devoutdevout membememberr ofof thethe churchchurch andand thethe candidatecandidate mostmost representativrepresentativee ofof "Mormon"Mormon values.values."" HeHe alsoalso tooktook advantageadvantage ofof thethe disillusionmentdisillusionment withwith governmengovernmentt thathatt developeddeveloped throughoutthroughout thethe nationnation inin thethe aftermathaftermath ofof VietnamVietnam andand WatergateWatergate.. HHee campaignecampaignedd ttoo reducereduce federalfederal spendingspending atat a timetime whenwhen manymany votersvoters struggledstruggled witwithh aann economiceconomic recessionrecession andand resentedresented thatthat taxtax dollarsdollars werewere beingbeing usedused ttoo supportsupport redistributionaryredistributionary federalfederal policiespolicies benefitingbenefiting minoritiesminorities andand thethe underclass.underclass. Hatch'Hatch'ss wiwinn waswas parpartt ofof a viable unusually partisan 1970s c -\oJ 5: w o all and political P an m realignment y o d strong early a m o 3 B contenders £L 3 ^<* 1980s. <jq 198 because o bec o 0 a toward c r3 oo The V3 Democrats ft H in Republicans Republican the a 3D o3 n> state. 8" o 13 §• lost I o go Party credibility throughout o v a3 Idominance I CL c o era with 3 the i—»• 3 Mountain LDS o r that I O emerged voters I < 0) o | CD 3West «-+ >-i oand SI ain . region ceased o 3Utah 3 c era <-f was oin to s- the be B' cr $late I FFo orr mymy parents,parents, whwhoo taughtaughtt meme toto cherishcherish educationeducation TABLETABLE OFOF CONTENTSCONTENTS ABSTRACTABSTRACT ............................................................................ iivv ACKNOWLEDGMENTSACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................... viiviiii INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 11 UTAHUTAH POLITICSPOLITICS ININ mSTORICALHISTORICAL CONTEXTCONTEXT ................................ 3 THETHE CANDIDATESCANDIDATES OFOF 19761976 ...................................................... 9 THETHE REPUBLICANREPUBLICAN PRIMARyPRIMARY ................................................... 2222 THETHE GENERALGENERAL ELECTIONELECTION ...................................................... 2277 REGIONALREGIONAL PARTISANPARTISAN REALIGNMENTREALIGNMENT ..................................... 4466 SELECTEDSELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHYBIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................... 5544 ACKNOWLEDGMENTSACKNOWLEDGMENTS ThisThis thesisthesis wouldwould notnot havehave beenbeen possiblpossiblee withoutwithout thethe assistancassistancee anandd supportsupport ooff manymany people.people. First,First, I wouldwould likelike toto thankthank thethe membersmembers ofof mymy master'smaster's committee,committee, WW.. PaulPaul Reeve,Reeve, RobertRobert A.A. Goldberg,Goldberg, andand L.L. RayRay Gunn,Gunn, forfor theirtheir guidance.guidance. I alsoalso appreciateappreciate thethe numerousnumerous individualsindividuals whowho consentedconsented toto bbee interviewedinterviewed forfor thisthis paperpaper.. TheyThey provideprovidedd anan insiderinsider perspectivperspectivee thatthat helpedhelped meme toto understandunderstand UtahUtah politicpoliticss inin thethe 1970s.1970s. ThThee CharlesCharles ReddRedd CenterCenter forfor WesternWestern StudiesStudies atat BrighamBrigham YoungYoung UniversityUniversity provideprovidedd meme withwith a traveltravel grantgrant thatthat helpedhelped meme completecomplete researchresearch aboutabout regionalregional politicalpolitical developmentsdevelopments inin 1976.1976. ArchivalArchival materialsmaterials fromfrom thethe SpecialSpecial CollectionsCollections DepartmentDepartment atat thethe UniversityUniversity ooff Utah'sUtah's 1.J. WillardWillard MarriottMarriott LibraryLibrary werewere essentialessential toto thethe completioncompletion ofof thisthis projectproject.. I alsalsoo benefitedbenefited fromfrom thethe holdingsholdings ofof thethe UniversityUniversity ofof NeNeww MexicMexicoo PoliticaPoliticall ArchiveArchive,, ththee AmericanAmerican HeritageHeritage CenterCenter atat thethe UniversityUniversity ofof Wyoming,Wyoming, andand thethe NeNeww MexicoMexico StateState RecordsRecords CenterCenter andand Archives.Archives. AdditionalAdditional thanksthanks gogo toto MatthewMatthew Basso,Basso, WalterWalter JonesJones,, RoseRose Diaz,Diaz, MatthewMatthew Burbank,Burbank, NadjNadjaa Durbach,Durbach, W.W. LindsayLindsay Adams,Adams, JennyJenny Brundin,Brundin, MarciaMarcia Rogers,Rogers, andand WillWill Smiley.Smiley. INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION InIn 1976,1976, a previouslpreviouslyy unknownunknown attorneyattorney namednamed OrrinOrrin HatchHatch ranran forfor thethe UnitedUnited StatesStates SenateSenate inin Utah.Utah. DespiteDespite havinhavingg nono politicapoliticall experience,experience, HatchHatch wonwon thethe state'sstate's RepublicanRepublican primarprimaryy andand wentwent onon toto defeatdefeat incumbentincumbent senatorsenator FrankFrank MossMoss inin thethe generalgeneral election.election. MossMoss hadhad eighteeneighteen yearsyears ofof senatorialsenatorial seniorityseniority andand heldheld a powerfulpowerful leadershipleadership positionposition withinwithin thethe DemocraticDemocratic caucus,caucus, yetyet UtahUtah votersvoters abandonedabandoned himhim forfor Hatch,Hatch, whowho hadhad onlyonly residedresided inin thethe statestate forfor sevenseven yearsyears prior toto thethe election.election. Hatch'sHatch's defeatdefeat ofof MossMoss signaledsignaled a significantsignificant shiftshift inin Utah'sUtah's politicapoliticall balancebalance ofof powepowerr duringduring thethe latelate 1970s.1970s. TheThe RepublicanRepublican PartyParty becambecamee dominantdominant inin statestate politics,politics, whilewhile thethe DemocraticDemocratic PartyParty declineddeclined toto minorityminority status.status. ThisThis statewidestatewide politicalpolitical realignmentrealignment occurredoccurred whenwhen conservatismconservatism waswas onon thethe riserise inin thethe UnitedUnited States,States, especiallyespecially
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Directory UTAH
    274 Congressional Directory UTAH UTAH (Population 2010, 2,763,885) SENATORS MICHAEL S. LEE, Republican, of Alpine, UT; born in Mesa, AZ, June 4, 1971; education: B.S., Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 1994; J.D., Brigham Young University, 1997; pro- fessional: law clerk to Judge Dee Benson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah; law clerk to Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court; attorney with the law firm Sidley & Austin; Assistant U.S. Attorney in Salt Lake City; general counsel to the Governor of Utah; law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito; partner at Howrey law firm; religion: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; married: Sharon Burr of Provo, UT; children: James, John, and Eliza; committees: chair, Joint Economic Committee; Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Energy and Natural Resources; Judiciary; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 2, 2010; reelected to the U.S. Senate on November 8, 2016. Office Listings https://lee.senate.gov https://facebook.com/senatormikelee https://twitter.com/SenMikeLee https://youtube.com/senatormikelee 361A Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .............................................. (202) 224–5444 Chief of Staff.—Allyson Bell. FAX: 228–1168 Legislative Director.—Christy Woodruff. Communications Director.—Conn Carroll. Press Secretary.—Erik Kujanpaa. Administrative Director.—Alyssa Burleson. State Director.—Robert Axson. Federal Building, 125 South State, Suite 4225, Salt Lake City, UT 84138 ........................... (801) 524–5933 Federal Building, 324 25th Street, Suite 1410, Ogden, UT 84401 ......................................... (801) 392–9633 285 West Tabernacle Street, Suite 200, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates the Politics and Process of Utah’S Unique Convention and Primary System
    Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates The Politics and Process of Utah’s Unique Convention and Primary System HIGHLIGHTS For most of its history, Utah has used a convention- g Utah is one of only seven states that still uses a primary system to nominate candidates for elected office. convention, and the only one that allows political parties to preclude a primary election for major In the spring of election years, citizens in small caucus offices if candidates receive enough delegate votes. g Utah adopted a direct primary in 1937, a system meetings held throughout the state elect delegates to which lasted 10 years. represent them at county and state conventions. County g In 1947, the Legislature re-established a caucus- convention system. If a candidate obtained 80% or conventions nominate candidates for races solely within more of the delegates’ votes in the convention, he or she was declared the nominee without a primary. the county boundaries, while the state convention is used g In the 1990s, the Legislature granted more power to the parties to manage their conventions. In to nominate candidates for statewide offices or those 1996, the then-70% threshold to avoid a primary was lowered to 60% by the Democratic Party. The that serve districts that span multiple counties. At these Republican Party made the same change in 1999. conventions, delegates nominate candidates to compete g Utah’s historically high voter turnout rates have consistently declined in recent decades. In 1960, for their party’s nomination in the primary election, or, 78.3% of the voting age population voted in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • February 9, 1967 HON. RICHARD D. Mccarthy
    February 9, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- SENATE 3281 CONFIRMATIONS FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION Executive nominations confirmed by Lowell K. Bridwell, of Ohio, to be Adminis­ Joe W. Fleming II, of Arkansas, to be Fed­ the Senate February 9 (legislative day of trator of the Federal Highway Administra­ eral cochairman of the Appalachian Regional February 8), 1967: tion. Commission. EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS Rail Rapid Transit emphatic yes! The poor and indigent must tegrate pieces. The wide right-of-way is in­ have ready and economical access to the out­ appropriate in cities. It wreaks havoc with er communities. This is where many of the existing structures; takes too much off the EXTENSION OF REMARKS employment opportunities these people seek tax rolls, and cuts great swaths through the OF are located. neighborhoods." (Patrick Healy, executive The model city sessions were devoted pri­ director, National League of Cities.) HON. RICHARD D. McCARTHY marily to the conditions within our core Again, there was the W1lliamsburg Confer­ OF NEW YORK areas. Through a common effort, many of ence, where Detroit's Mayor Cavanaugh, the problems faced by the forgotten, un­ President of the National League of Cities, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES skilled and deprived groups, could be solved. said: "We must keep in mind the necessity Thursday, February 9, 1967 In addition, certain areas outside of our of including a strong component of rapid present city limits are also plagued by pov­ transit if we are to end up with a balanced Mr. McCARTHY. Mr. Speaker, the erty. These neighboring residents could be transportation system in the comprehensive necessity of rail rapid transit to match helped by the opening of job opportunities plan because huge sums for urban highways America's future transportation needs which were previously limited because of the will never by themselves solve urban trans­ and requirements was emphasized to me lack of good public transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Report Number 710, June 2012 Partisan Politics, Polarization, and Participation
    Research Report Report Number 710, June 2012 Partisan Politics, Polarization, and Participation HIGHLIGHTS In the 2012 Utah Priorities Survey, respondents listed g In the 2012 Utah Priorities Survey, 52% of partisan politics as one of their top concerns for the respondents reported that they were concerned or very concerned about partisan politics, upcoming elections. This is significant not only because making it a top-ten issue for Utahns in this year’s elections. it was the first time this issue had been listed as a top-ten g The current Congress shows the highest historical level of polarization since the end of concern in this series of surveys, but also the first time it Reconstruction. was seen as a concern at all. There have been many reports g Since 1939, there has been a slow and steady decline in the number of moderates in the U.S. about the rise in partisanship and party polarization in Congress to a historic low for both chambers in 2011. national politics, and on the implications of this increase. g Utah’s voter turnout rate has been declining Partisanship can have important influences on voter turnout rates. Research indicates throughout the past several decades. Whereas Utah’s rate used to be well above the national that an increase in polarization “energizes the electorate” and increases voter turnout; average, it is now below average. high participation is indicative of a highly informed electorate where polarization is at its 1 g Research shows that the perception that an greatest. However, Utah’s voter participation rate has been declining for several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • 61560NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ;"'1 . MEDICARE AND MEDICAID FRAUDS HEARING BEFOruO ~'lIE SPECIAL COMlfITTEE ON AGING lTNIT)jJD STATES SENATE NINETY-FOURTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PART 7-WASHINGTON, D.C. NOVEMBER 17, 197(1 JUN 2 b 1978 ACQUiSITiONS .nted for the use of the Special Committee 011 Aging U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1977 Ie SuperIntendent of Documents, U.S. Government PrInting Office WashIngton, D.C. 20402 - ______L ______ •r SPEClA.L COMl\HT1.'EEl ON AGING FRANK CHURCH, Idall0, Ollairmtl.ll HARRISON A. WILLIAMS, JH., New .Tersey HIRAM L. FONG, IItn\,al! JENNINGS ItANDOLPII, Wcst Virgiula CLIFFORD P. HANSEN, Wyoming EDMUND S. MUSKIE, Maine EDWARD W. BROOKE, Massachusetts l!'IlANK ID. MORS, Utah CHAllLES H. PElWY, Illinois EDWAltD 1\[, KENNEDY, Massachusetts ROBIORT ~'. r:!'AFFOllD, Vermont WAT/l'lDlt l!'. l\lONDALID, lIf.innesota :r. GLENN BEALL, .TIt., lIIaryland VANCE HL\It~'KE, In<1ltlllL PE~'E V. DOi\IENlCI, New Mexico CI:'L\IBORNE l'ELL, Rhocle Island BILL BROCK, ~rennessee ~'HOll[AS F. EAGLETON, MissourI DEWEY l!'. BAll~'rJETT, OI(lahomfl .TOlIN V. 'rUNNEY, Callrornla LAW~'ON CHILES, Florida DICK CLAIlK, Iowa JOlIN A. DURKIN, New Hampshire WITJLIA~I E. OltlOr" Staff Diractol' DAVID A. AF~'FlLD'l', Ollie! OOl/lIscl VAL J. flALAMANDAllIS, Assoalatc OOl/lIscl JOHN GUY MILLEn, Millority Staff Dircctol' PATUICU G. OnIOL, Ohio! O/.erk lIIeMcul'e and lIIedicaid l~rauds : Pltrt 1. Washington, D.C., September 2G, 1975. I'nrt 2. Wllshlugton, D.C., Noyember 13. 1075. l'art 3. Wnshington, D.C., December 5, 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates the Politics and Process of Utah’S Unique Convention and Primary System
    Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates The Politics and Process of Utah’s Unique Convention and Primary System HIGHLIGHTS For most of its history, Utah has used a convention- g Utah is one of only seven states that still uses a primary system to nominate candidates for elected office. convention, and the only one that allows political parties to preclude a primary election for major In the spring of election years, citizens in small caucus offices if candidates receive enough delegate votes. g Utah adopted a direct primary in 1937, a system meetings held throughout the state elect delegates to which lasted 10 years. represent them at county and state conventions. County g In 1947, the Legislature re-established a caucus- convention system. If a candidate obtained 70% or conventions nominate candidates for races solely within more of the delegates’ votes in the convention, he or she was declared the nominee without a primary. the county boundaries, while the state convention is used g In the 1990s, the Legislature granted more power to the parties to manage their conventions. In 1996, to nominate candidates for statewide offices or those the 70% threshold to avoid a primary was lowered to 60% by the Democratic Party. The Republican that serve districts that span multiple counties. At these Party made the same change in 1999. conventions, delegates nominate candidates to compete g Utah’s historically high voter turnout rates have consistently declined in recent decades. In 1960, for their party’s nomination in the primary election, or, 78.3% of the voting age population voted in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File 1958 Post-Election Study (1958.T)
    app1958.txt Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE 1958 POST-ELECTION STUDY (1958.T) >> 1958 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE CODE, POSITIVE REFERENCES CODED REFERENCES TO OPPONENT ONLY IN REASONS FOR VOTE. ELSEWHERE CODED REFERENCES TO OPPONENT IN OPPONENT'S CODE. CANDIDATE 00. GOOD MAN, WELL QUALIFIED FOR THE JOB. WOULD MAKE A GOOD CONGRESSMAN. R HAS HEARD GOOD THINGS ABOUT HIM. CAPABLE, HAS ABILITY 01. CANDIDATE'S RECORD AND EXPERIENCE IN POLITICS, GOVERNMENT, AS CONGRESSMAN. HAS DONE GOOD JOB, LONG SERVICE IN PUBLIC OFFICE 02. CANDIDATE'S RECORD AND EXPERIENCE OTHER THAN POLITICS OR PUBLIC OFFICE OR NA WHETHER POLITICAL 03. PERSONAL ABILITY AND ATTRIBUTES. A LEADER, DECISIVE, HARD-WORKING, INTELLIGENT, EDUCATED, ENERGETIC 04. PERSONAL ABILITY AND ATTRIBUTES. HUMBLE, SINCERE, RELIGIOUS 05. PERSONAL ABILITY AND ATTRIBUTES. MAN OF INTEGRITY. HONEST. STANDS UP FOR WHAT HE BELIEVES IN. PUBLIC SPIRITED. CONSCIENTIOUS. FAIR. INDEPENDENT, HAS PRINCIPLES 06. PERSONAL ATTRACTIVENESS. LIKE HIM AS A PERSON, LIKABLE, GOOD PERSONALITY, FRIENDLY, WARM 07. PERSONAL ATTRACTIVENESS. COMES FROM A GOOD FAMILY. LIKE HIS FAMILY, WIFE. GOOD HOME LIFE 08. AGE, NOT TOO OLD, NOT TOO YOUNG, YOUNG, OLD 09. OTHER THE MAN, THE PARTY, OR THE DISTRICT 10. CANDIDATE'S PARTY AFFILIATION. HE IS A (DEM) (REP) 11. I ALWAYS VOTE A STRAIGHT TICKET. TO SUPPORT MY PARTY 12. HE'S DIFFERENT FROM (BETTER THAN) MOST (D'S) (R'S) 13. GOOD CAMPAIGN. GOOD SPEAKER. LIKED HIS CAMPAIGN, Page 1 app1958.txt CLEAN, HONEST. VOTE-GETTER 14. HE LISTENS TO THE PEOPLE BACK HOME. HE DOES (WILL DO) WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT 15. HE MIXES WITH THE COMMON PEOPLE.
    [Show full text]
  • UTAH BAR JOURNAL Vol
    E" UTAH BAR JOURNAL Vol. 9 No.5 May 1996 c Utah Construction Law: Recovery For Nonpayment 8 APracticing Historical Law in the Utah Territory: Sketch 12 Strike the Unsigned Minute Entry! 18 Utah Office of Guardian Ad Litem 21 Justice Court Growth 35 "" r- Utah 0 Published by The Utah State Bar UTAH BAR JOURNAL- 645 South 200 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Vol. 9 NO.5 May 1996 Telephone (801) 531-9077 President VISION OF THE BAR: To lead society in the creation of a justice system Dennis V. Haslam that is understood, valued, respected and accessible to all. President-Elect MISSION OF THE BAR: To represent lawyers in the State of Utah and Steven M. Kaufman to serve the public and the legal profession by promoting justice, profes- Executive Director sional excellence, civility, ethics, respect for and understanding of, the law. John C. Baldwin Bar Journal Committee Letters to the Editor......... ......... ............. ...... ......... ...... ...........................4 and Editorial Board Editor President's .Message ...... ......... .................... ...... ......... .... ..... ...... ....... ... ...5 Calvin E. Thorpe by Dennis V. Haslam Associate Editors M. Karlynn Hinman Commissioner's Report .........................................................................6 Willam D. Holyoak by John Florez R'àndall L. Romrell Articles Editors Utah Construction Law: Recovery For Nonpayment ...........................8 Christopher Burke by Michael iv Homer and David J. Burns Lee S. McCullough Letters Editor Practicing Law in the Utah Territory: A Historical Sketch.................12 Victoria Kidman by David Epperson Views from the Bench Editors Judge Michael L. Hutchings Strike the Unsigned Minute Entry! .....................................................18 Judge Stephen VanDyke by Michael A. Jensen Legislative Report Editor Lisa Watts Baskin Utah Office of Guardian Ad Litem .....................................................21 Case Summaries Editors by Kristin G.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Before BCRA: Soft Money at the State Level
    L I F E B E F O R E B C R A S O F T M O N E Y A T T H E S T A T E L E V E L I N T H E 2 0 0 0 & 2 0 0 2 E L E C T I O N C Y C L E S By D E N I S E B A R B E R T H E I N S T I T U T E O N M O N E Y I N S T A T E P O L I T I C S D E C . 1 7 , 2 0 0 3 1 833 NORTH MAIN, SECOND FLOOR • HELENA, MT • 59601 PHONE 406-449-2480 • FAX 406-457-2091 • E-MAIL [email protected] www.followthemoney.org T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S State Parties: Looking for New Dance Partners ........................................3 Summary of Findings...............................................................................5 State-by-State Rankings ...........................................................................7 Who Gives to State Party Committees? ....................................................9 National Committees: State Party Sugar Daddies ................................... 10 Patterns in Giving....................................................................... 11 Transfers and Trading................................................................. 11 Reporting Discrepancies ............................................................. 13 Top Individual Contributors ................................................................... 14 Interstate Trading of Soft Money............................................................ 19 Top Industries ........................................................................................ 21 Tables ........................................................................................................ Table 1: Soft-Money Contributions, 2000 and 2002......................7 Table 2: Types of Contributors to State Party Committees ............9 Table 3: Soft Money from the National Committees ................... 10 Table 4: Top 25 Individual Contributors of Soft Money.............. 16 Table 5: Top 30 Industries Contributing to State Parties.............
    [Show full text]
  • Participation
    PARTICIPATION A LOOK BACK AT 2007 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum “OUR YOUNG, BEST MINDS MUST BE ENCOURAGED TO ENTER POLITICS.” Robert H. Hinckley 2 In This Issue Dr. J.D. Williams Page 3 Hinckley News Page 4 Internship Programs Page 8 Outstanding Interns Page 16 Scholarships Page 18 PARTICIPATION Hinckley Forums Page 20 Alumni Spotlights Page 25 Hinckley Staff Page 26 Donors Page 28 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum Since 1965, the Hinckley Institute has held more than 2,000 Hinckley Forums (previously known as “Coffee & Politics”) featuring local, national, and international political leaders. Hinckley Forums provide University of Utah students and the surrounding community intimate access to and interaction with our nation’s leaders. Under the direction of Hinck- ley Institute assistant director Jayne Nelson, the Hinckley Institute hosts 65-75 forums each year in the newly renovated Hinckley Caucus Room. Partnerships with supporting Univer- sity of Utah colleges and departments, local radio and news stations, our generous donors, and the Sam Rich Program in International Politics ensure the continued success of the Hinckley Forums program. University of Utah students can now receive credit for attend- ing Hinckley Forums by enrolling in the Political Forum Series course (Political Science 3910). All Hinckley Forums are free and open to the public. For a detailed listing of 2007 Hinckley Forums, refer to pages 20 – 24. Past Hinckley Forum Guests Prince Turki Al-Faisal Archibald Cox Edward Kennedy Frank Moss Karl Rove Al Saud Russ Feingold William Lawrence Ralph Nader Larry Sabato Norman Bangerter Gerald Ford Michael Leavitt Richard Neustadt Brian Schweitzer Robert Bennett Jake Garn Richard Lugar Dallin H.
    [Show full text]
  • Defendant FEC's Motion for Summary
    Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC-SS-TSC Document 41 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 131 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ) LOUISIANA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No. 15-1241 (CRC-SS-TSC) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) respectfully moves this Court for an order (1) granting summary judgment to the Commission pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7(h), and (2) denying plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion (Docket No. 33). In support of this motion, the Commission is filing a Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, a Statement of Material Facts and accompanying Exhibits, and a Proposed Order. Pursuant to the protective order entered in this case, the Commission is separately submitting under seal unredacted versions of its Statement of Material Facts and Exhibits that plaintiffs have designated as confidential. Respectfully submitted, Daniel A. Petalas (D.C. Bar No. 467908) Seth Nesin Acting General Counsel Attorney [email protected] [email protected] Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) Greg J. Mueller (D.C. Bar No. 462840) Deputy General Counsel — Law Attorney [email protected] [email protected] Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC-SS-TSC Document 41 Filed 03/18/16 Page 2 of 131 Kevin Deeley /s/ Charles Kitcher Acting Associate General Counsel Charles Kitcher (D.C. Bar No. 986226) [email protected] Attorney [email protected] Harry J.
    [Show full text]
  • John A. Carver, Jr. Oral History Interview – JFK#8, 11/25/1969 Administrative Information
    John A. Carver, Jr. Oral History Interview – JFK#8, 11/25/1969 Administrative Information Creator: John A. Carver, Jr. Interviewer: William W. Moss Date of Interview: November 25, 1969 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 44 pages. Note: Page numbering begins at 80 and ends on 123. Biographical Note Carver was Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Public Lands Management from 1961 to 1964, Under Secretary of the Interior from 1965 to 1966, and Commissioner of the Federal Power Commission from 1966 to 1972. In this interview Carver discusses the working relationships the Department of the Interior had with various Senators on the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, in both the John F. Kennedy Administration and the Lyndon B. Johnson Administration, as well as his personal relationships with some of the same Senators, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed June 23, 1997, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement.
    [Show full text]