DOCSLIB.ORG

Western States Primary: the Westward Trend in Presidential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western States Primary: the Westward Trend in Presidential Article from Policy Perspectives http://www.imakenews.com/eletra/mod_print_view.cfm?this_id=70187... Article from Policy Perspectives (http://www.imakenews.com/cppa/e_article000701873.cfm?x=b6Gdd3k,b30DNQvw,w) November 27, 2006 Western Primary Update The Westward Trend in Presidential Elections by Jennifer Robinson, Research Associate, CPPA Governor Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. and Governor Bill Richardson joined more than 150 other officials and academics from across the Intermountain West for the Western Presidential Primary Symposium in Salt Lake City this fall. The Symposium, hosted by the Center for Public Policy & Administration, explored the benefits and challenges of implementing a regional presidential primary in 2008. Three states—Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico—will be part of the Western Presidential Primary on February 5, 2008. That puts the Western Primary fifth in the presidential campaign season, behind Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. This is getting the West noticed by both Democrats and Republicans. “The path to the presidency is still gonna be through Iowa and New Hampshire. But what’s happened now is the West has a voice and a real choice in the selection of the next American president,” said Governor Bill Richardson. “The era when Western states, like Montana in 2004, would not receive one single presidential candidate visit, Democrat or Republican, is over. No longer will the West be a flyover state for presidential candidates. The presidential primary season, Western states and Western issues, will be at center stage. So hosting these early primaries in the 2008 election cycle is a victory for Western states. But it’s good for the country as well.” Several other states are interested in moving their primary dates to February 5, 2008, including Montana and Idaho. Montana Governor, Brian Schweitzer, attended the signing of Utah’s legislation last spring, signifying his support of the Western Presidential Primary. Montana Secretary of State, Brad Johnson, who attended the Symposium in Salt Lake City, also signaled his support of a Western Primary. During the Q&A with Governor Bill Richardson, Sec. Johnson asked: “Would you be willing to come visit our great state and help me sell this as we move toward the next session?” It is expected that legislation will be introduced in the 2007 session in Montana. From Republican Governor Huntsman to Democratic Governor Schweitzer, the evidence is clear, both Republicans and Democrats support a Western Primary. The Western Primary, for many of the symposium’s panelists, is just one element of a broader strategy to get Western issues noticed. Most panelists, both Democrats and Republicans, agreed that Western issues are simply ignored by presidential candidates, as well as others inside the beltway. “Now, therefore, not surprisingly, we have some uniquely western issues that sometimes aren’t paid enough attention to by policy makers and leaders in Washington, like water, like public lands, like nuclear waste, like school trust lands, and issues around energy development,” said Governor Huntsman. “When presidential contenders are as familiar with the PLT Program (Payment in Lieu of Taxes, if anybody is interested in that), as they are with ethanol produced in Iowa, then we will have accomplished our goal.” Pam Inmann, Executive Director of the Western Governors’ Association, said a regional primary would force candidates to discuss traditionally Western issues. And according to Natalie Gochnour, Vice President of the Salt Lake Chamber, that is something that has not been done in the past. “We’re not only left out, we’re disenfranchised. We’re on the outside looking in on the most important national election. We have an obligation to use the primary as a strategic building block to political relevancy,” said Gochnour. It appears that the West is already becoming more politically relevant. During the 2006 1 of 3 6/11/2007 1:16 PM Article from Policy Perspectives http://www.imakenews.com/eletra/mod_print_view.cfm?this_id=70187... mid-term elections the West became an election battleground. The president made several campaign stops in the West just days before the November election, including stops in Elko, Nevada and Billings, Montana. “American politics has always been defined (or imprisoned) by Mason and Dixon, by regional rifts engendered by slavery, the Civil War and the Bible Belt. But now the relevant names are Lewis and Clark. The westward trend is clear. For the first time, leaders of the House and Senate are from the Far West” (Fineman 2006). The success of Western Democrats in the 2006 mid-term elections “mean both national parties will pay more attention to the West,” says Michael Stratton, a Democratic campaign strategist in Denver. "It sets the grounds for the candidacy of a president who can speak Western issues." (Kasindorf and Kenworthy 2006). “There are probably five presidential candidates who have full-time organizers in Nevada as we speak, actively working for the democratic ticket so that they have a leg up for January of 2008,” said Mike Stratton. It also appears that Denver may host the 2008 Democratic National Convention. John Hickenlooper, Mayor of Denver, along with governors and other officials from the West, is working to secure the city’s bid. “The event could help raise the profile of a region that has become increasingly important to both major political parties,” Hickenlooper said (Sarche 2006). Republican front runners have Western roots (Sen. John McCain from Arizona, Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a member of the Utah-based Mormons). Spanish-speaking Democrats (Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico, Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut) can go native” (Fineman 2006). Most panelists who spoke at The Western Presidential Primary Symposium agreed that a Western Primary would force presidential candidates to learn about Western issues. “It would be a news story to see the candidates come out here to the Intermountain West and start talking about some of these issues,” said Martin Kasindorf of USA TODAY. “Now, of course, they talk about healthcare and education. But they would, I believe, have to talk about [Western issues] because the local news media would ask them about Western regional issues. And if they want their time on TV, and if they want to have their individual one-on-one interviews with the local stations, they better know these local issues. The national press traveling with them who are watching what they do and what they say would pick up on that as a news story. This is something new in American presidential primaries, Western issues.” And according to political strategist, Mike Gehrke, when candidates visit a state, and talk with people, it changes their outlook and perspective on issues. The Western States Primary Symposium was sponsored by Micron, Chevron, Intermountain Power Agency, Utah Republican Party, Utah Association of Financial Services, Utah Democratic Party, the Hinckley Institute of Politics, Western Policy Research Center, and the Center for Public Policy & Administration. For more information about the symposium, please contact Jennifer Robinson at 801-585-3048 or [email protected]. References: Fineman, Howard. 2006. “How the West is being Won.” Newsweek. November 20. Kasindorf, Martin, and Tom Kenworthy. 2006. “Behind Democrats' climb in Mountain West.” USA TODAY. November 21. Sarche, Jon. 2006. “Denver gets help in bid to land '08 Dem convention.” Associated Press. November 20. Vergakis, Brock. 2006. “Utah looks to move up, push Western presidential primary.” Associated Press. April 1. Western Governors’ Association. 2004. Western Governors’ Association Policy Resolution 4-13 “Western States Presidential Caucus/Primary.” http://www.westgov.org/wga/policy/04/caucus.pdf 2 of 3 6/11/2007 1:16 PM Article from Policy Perspectives http://www.imakenews.com/eletra/mod_print_view.cfm?this_id=70187... Western Presidential Primary Symposium. 2006. http://www.westernpolicynetwork.org/2006_Symposium.html Published by Center for Public Policy & Administration Copyright © 2007 The University of Utah. All rights reserved. The Center for Public Policy & Administration offers research, education and services to public and nonprofit organizations that will strengthen administration, leadership and public policy making. Powered by IMN 3 of 3 6/11/2007 1:16 PM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Directory UTAH
    274 Congressional Directory UTAH UTAH (Population 2010, 2,763,885) SENATORS MICHAEL S. LEE, Republican, of Alpine, UT; born in Mesa, AZ, June 4, 1971; education: B.S., Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 1994; J.D., Brigham Young University, 1997; pro- fessional: law clerk to Judge Dee Benson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah; law clerk to Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court; attorney with the law firm Sidley & Austin; Assistant U.S. Attorney in Salt Lake City; general counsel to the Governor of Utah; law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito; partner at Howrey law firm; religion: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; married: Sharon Burr of Provo, UT; children: James, John, and Eliza; committees: chair, Joint Economic Committee; Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Energy and Natural Resources; Judiciary; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 2, 2010; reelected to the U.S. Senate on November 8, 2016. Office Listings https://lee.senate.gov https://facebook.com/senatormikelee https://twitter.com/SenMikeLee https://youtube.com/senatormikelee 361A Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .............................................. (202) 224–5444 Chief of Staff.—Allyson Bell. FAX: 228–1168 Legislative Director.—Christy Woodruff. Communications Director.—Conn Carroll. Press Secretary.—Erik Kujanpaa. Administrative Director.—Alyssa Burleson. State Director.—Robert Axson. Federal Building, 125 South State, Suite 4225, Salt Lake City, UT 84138 ........................... (801) 524–5933 Federal Building, 324 25th Street, Suite 1410, Ogden, UT 84401 ......................................... (801) 392–9633 285 West Tabernacle Street, Suite 200, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates the Politics and Process of Utah’S Unique Convention and Primary System
    Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates The Politics and Process of Utah’s Unique Convention and Primary System HIGHLIGHTS For most of its history, Utah has used a convention- g Utah is one of only seven states that still uses a primary system to nominate candidates for elected office. convention, and the only one that allows political parties to preclude a primary election for major In the spring of election years, citizens in small caucus offices if candidates receive enough delegate votes. g Utah adopted a direct primary in 1937, a system meetings held throughout the state elect delegates to which lasted 10 years. represent them at county and state conventions. County g In 1947, the Legislature re-established a caucus- convention system. If a candidate obtained 80% or conventions nominate candidates for races solely within more of the delegates’ votes in the convention, he or she was declared the nominee without a primary. the county boundaries, while the state convention is used g In the 1990s, the Legislature granted more power to the parties to manage their conventions. In to nominate candidates for statewide offices or those 1996, the then-70% threshold to avoid a primary was lowered to 60% by the Democratic Party. The that serve districts that span multiple counties. At these Republican Party made the same change in 1999. conventions, delegates nominate candidates to compete g Utah’s historically high voter turnout rates have consistently declined in recent decades. In 1960, for their party’s nomination in the primary election, or, 78.3% of the voting age population voted in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Report Number 710, June 2012 Partisan Politics, Polarization, and Participation
    Research Report Report Number 710, June 2012 Partisan Politics, Polarization, and Participation HIGHLIGHTS In the 2012 Utah Priorities Survey, respondents listed g In the 2012 Utah Priorities Survey, 52% of partisan politics as one of their top concerns for the respondents reported that they were concerned or very concerned about partisan politics, upcoming elections. This is significant not only because making it a top-ten issue for Utahns in this year’s elections. it was the first time this issue had been listed as a top-ten g The current Congress shows the highest historical level of polarization since the end of concern in this series of surveys, but also the first time it Reconstruction. was seen as a concern at all. There have been many reports g Since 1939, there has been a slow and steady decline in the number of moderates in the U.S. about the rise in partisanship and party polarization in Congress to a historic low for both chambers in 2011. national politics, and on the implications of this increase. g Utah’s voter turnout rate has been declining Partisanship can have important influences on voter turnout rates. Research indicates throughout the past several decades. Whereas Utah’s rate used to be well above the national that an increase in polarization “energizes the electorate” and increases voter turnout; average, it is now below average. high participation is indicative of a highly informed electorate where polarization is at its 1 g Research shows that the perception that an greatest. However, Utah’s voter participation rate has been declining for several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates the Politics and Process of Utah’S Unique Convention and Primary System
    Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates The Politics and Process of Utah’s Unique Convention and Primary System HIGHLIGHTS For most of its history, Utah has used a convention- g Utah is one of only seven states that still uses a primary system to nominate candidates for elected office. convention, and the only one that allows political parties to preclude a primary election for major In the spring of election years, citizens in small caucus offices if candidates receive enough delegate votes. g Utah adopted a direct primary in 1937, a system meetings held throughout the state elect delegates to which lasted 10 years. represent them at county and state conventions. County g In 1947, the Legislature re-established a caucus- convention system. If a candidate obtained 70% or conventions nominate candidates for races solely within more of the delegates’ votes in the convention, he or she was declared the nominee without a primary. the county boundaries, while the state convention is used g In the 1990s, the Legislature granted more power to the parties to manage their conventions. In 1996, to nominate candidates for statewide offices or those the 70% threshold to avoid a primary was lowered to 60% by the Democratic Party. The Republican that serve districts that span multiple counties. At these Party made the same change in 1999. conventions, delegates nominate candidates to compete g Utah’s historically high voter turnout rates have consistently declined in recent decades. In 1960, for their party’s nomination in the primary election, or, 78.3% of the voting age population voted in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • UTAH BAR JOURNAL Vol
    E" UTAH BAR JOURNAL Vol. 9 No.5 May 1996 c Utah Construction Law: Recovery For Nonpayment 8 APracticing Historical Law in the Utah Territory: Sketch 12 Strike the Unsigned Minute Entry! 18 Utah Office of Guardian Ad Litem 21 Justice Court Growth 35 "" r- Utah 0 Published by The Utah State Bar UTAH BAR JOURNAL- 645 South 200 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Vol. 9 NO.5 May 1996 Telephone (801) 531-9077 President VISION OF THE BAR: To lead society in the creation of a justice system Dennis V. Haslam that is understood, valued, respected and accessible to all. President-Elect MISSION OF THE BAR: To represent lawyers in the State of Utah and Steven M. Kaufman to serve the public and the legal profession by promoting justice, profes- Executive Director sional excellence, civility, ethics, respect for and understanding of, the law. John C. Baldwin Bar Journal Committee Letters to the Editor......... ......... ............. ...... ......... ...... ...........................4 and Editorial Board Editor President's .Message ...... ......... .................... ...... ......... .... ..... ...... ....... ... ...5 Calvin E. Thorpe by Dennis V. Haslam Associate Editors M. Karlynn Hinman Commissioner's Report .........................................................................6 Willam D. Holyoak by John Florez R'àndall L. Romrell Articles Editors Utah Construction Law: Recovery For Nonpayment ...........................8 Christopher Burke by Michael iv Homer and David J. Burns Lee S. McCullough Letters Editor Practicing Law in the Utah Territory: A Historical Sketch.................12 Victoria Kidman by David Epperson Views from the Bench Editors Judge Michael L. Hutchings Strike the Unsigned Minute Entry! .....................................................18 Judge Stephen VanDyke by Michael A. Jensen Legislative Report Editor Lisa Watts Baskin Utah Office of Guardian Ad Litem .....................................................21 Case Summaries Editors by Kristin G.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Before BCRA: Soft Money at the State Level
    L I F E B E F O R E B C R A S O F T M O N E Y A T T H E S T A T E L E V E L I N T H E 2 0 0 0 & 2 0 0 2 E L E C T I O N C Y C L E S By D E N I S E B A R B E R T H E I N S T I T U T E O N M O N E Y I N S T A T E P O L I T I C S D E C . 1 7 , 2 0 0 3 1 833 NORTH MAIN, SECOND FLOOR • HELENA, MT • 59601 PHONE 406-449-2480 • FAX 406-457-2091 • E-MAIL [email protected] www.followthemoney.org T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S State Parties: Looking for New Dance Partners ........................................3 Summary of Findings...............................................................................5 State-by-State Rankings ...........................................................................7 Who Gives to State Party Committees? ....................................................9 National Committees: State Party Sugar Daddies ................................... 10 Patterns in Giving....................................................................... 11 Transfers and Trading................................................................. 11 Reporting Discrepancies ............................................................. 13 Top Individual Contributors ................................................................... 14 Interstate Trading of Soft Money............................................................ 19 Top Industries ........................................................................................ 21 Tables ........................................................................................................ Table 1: Soft-Money Contributions, 2000 and 2002......................7 Table 2: Types of Contributors to State Party Committees ............9 Table 3: Soft Money from the National Committees ................... 10 Table 4: Top 25 Individual Contributors of Soft Money.............. 16 Table 5: Top 30 Industries Contributing to State Parties.............
    [Show full text]
  • Defendant FEC's Motion for Summary
    Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC-SS-TSC Document 41 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 131 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ) LOUISIANA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civ. No. 15-1241 (CRC-SS-TSC) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) respectfully moves this Court for an order (1) granting summary judgment to the Commission pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7(h), and (2) denying plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion (Docket No. 33). In support of this motion, the Commission is filing a Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, a Statement of Material Facts and accompanying Exhibits, and a Proposed Order. Pursuant to the protective order entered in this case, the Commission is separately submitting under seal unredacted versions of its Statement of Material Facts and Exhibits that plaintiffs have designated as confidential. Respectfully submitted, Daniel A. Petalas (D.C. Bar No. 467908) Seth Nesin Acting General Counsel Attorney [email protected] [email protected] Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) Greg J. Mueller (D.C. Bar No. 462840) Deputy General Counsel — Law Attorney [email protected] [email protected] Case 1:15-cv-01241-CRC-SS-TSC Document 41 Filed 03/18/16 Page 2 of 131 Kevin Deeley /s/ Charles Kitcher Acting Associate General Counsel Charles Kitcher (D.C. Bar No. 986226) [email protected] Attorney [email protected] Harry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Contributions & Related Activity Report
    Political Contributions & Related Activity Report 2012 CARTER BECK JACKIE MACIAS ALAN ALBRIGHT SVP & Counsel VP & General Manager Legal Counsel to WellPAC Medicaid JOHN JESSER VP, Provider Engagement & GLORIA MCCARTHY JOHN WILLEY COC EVP, Enterprise Execution & Sr. Director, Efciency Government Relations 2012 WellPAC DAVID KRETSCHMER WellPAC Treasurer SVP, Treasurer & Chief MIKE MELLOH Investment Ofcer VP, Human Resources TRACY WINN Board of Directors Manager, Public Affairs ANDREW MORRISON DEB MOESSNER WellPAC Assistant Treasurer & SVP, Public Affairs President & General Manager Executive Director WellPAC Chairman KY 1 from the Chairman America’s health care system is in the midst of transformative change, and WellPoint is leading the way by making it easier for consumers to access and use it while improving the health of the people we serve. In this new post-reform era, WellPoint’s Public Affairs function is more important than ever as the government expands its regulatory scope into our key lines of business. By 2015, almost 66 percent of the company’s revenue will be paid either in part or entirely by the federal and state government. For this reason, we continue to play an active role in the political process through our Public Affairs efforts, industry memberships and WellPAC, our political action committee. More than 1,875 WellPoint associates provided voluntary nancial support to WellPAC in 2012. Their generosity allowed our PAC to make contributions of more than $780,000 to federal campaigns and $140,000 to state and local campaigns on both sides of the political aisle in 2012. Our participation in the political process helps us develop good working relationships with Members of Congress, as well as key state legislators, in order to communicate WellPoint’s perspective on a range of issues including the cost and quality of today’s health care, the establishment of insurance exchanges and the expansion of Medicaid.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution to Direct Rob Anderson As Chair of the 2018 Utah Republican Party to Work with the Governing Body of State Delegates and SCC Members
    Resolution To Direct Rob Anderson as Chair of the 2018 Utah Republican Party to work with the Governing Body of State Delegates and SCC members WHEREAS, Utah Republican Party Bylaws section 7.3 PARTY OFFICER NEUTRALITY requires Party Officers to remain neutral toward all candidates, and issues coming before the convention, and to not discriminate or restrict access to Party information and services. WHEREAS, in an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune, titled “Utah GOP chief slams Mitt Romney’s expected Senate run,” Rob Anderson is quoted as saying, “let’s face it, Mitt ​ Romney doesn’t live here, his kids weren’t born here, he doesn’t shop here.” He also compared Governor Romney to Hillary Clinton, and said, “I have two questions for Mitt. ​ ​ First of all, why? And how do you expect to represent Utah when you don’t live here?” Rob Anderson later claimed that he was misquoted and that his statements were taken out of context. However, a tape of the interview verifies that the Salt Lake Tribune reported the interview accurately. WHEREAS, Party Chairman Rob Anderson has engaged in a pattern of behavior in which he ignores the Rules of the Party, including: - Unilaterally modifying approved bylaws and submitting them to the Lieutenant Governor - Failing to submit an operating budget to be approved by the State Central Committee, which has resulted in an additional $50,000 in legal obligations to the ​ Party for legal counsel not approved by the SCC, as required by the Rules, and wrongfully using that legal counsel as personal counsel for
    [Show full text]
  • PM Singer Combined Dissertation 9.20.2
    Medicaid Expansion and the States: Implementation, Politics, and the Affordable Care Act by Phillip M. Singer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Health Services Organization and Policy) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Scott L. Greer, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Holly Jarman, Co-Chair Professor Nicholas Bagley Professor Barry Rabe Professor Charles C. Ragin Phillip M. Singer [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4067-0829 © Phillip M. Singer 2018 Dedication For Jennifer, Felix, and Edith for being my “still point of the turning world.” ii Acknowledgements I came to the University of Michigan in the Fall of 2011 after being accepted into the Masters in Health Services Administration program. Seven years later I not only have received my Masters but a PhD from the greatest University in the world. These past seven years have been humbling, enriching, and rewarding. I am incredibly grateful for all of the support that I have received from the faculty in Health Management and Policy. In particular, during my Masters training, I want to thank Dr.’s David Mendez, Richard Hirth, and Christy Lemak. Each of you supported and encouraged me to continue my education in the doctoral program. Without your guidance, support, and kindness I would not have even started on this journey. Any success that I have had during my time in the doctoral program has been a result of the people that I have collaborated with and learned from. Most prominently are my dissertation co-chairs Dr.’s Scott Greer and Holly Jarman.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States ———— UTAH REPUBLICAN PARTY, Petitioner, V
    No. 18-450 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— UTAH REPUBLICAN PARTY, Petitioner, v. SPENCER J. COX, et al., Respondents. ———— On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ———— BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE UTAH LEGISLATORS, CURRENT AND FORMER IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ———— LAURA EBERTING WILLIAM C. DUNCAN 2154 North 900 West Counsel of Record Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 1868 N 800 E (801) 592-5926 Lehi, UT 84043 [email protected] (801) 367-4570 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae November 13, 2018 WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D. C. 20002 i QUESTION PRESENTED This brief will address the first question presented in the Petition, as follows: Does the First Amendment permit a government to compel a political party to use a state-preferred process for selecting a party’s standard-bearers for a general election, not to prevent discrimination or unfairness, but to alter the predicted viewpoints of those standard-bearers? ii TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED ......................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................... iv INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 STATEMENT ............................................................. 3 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION ........ 5 I. The Majority’s Holding Empowers Monied Special Interests and Invites Fraud. ................... 5 A. The group pushing to change the Party’s nominating process was built by local monied interests concerned that the process gave them too little power. .......... 5 B. The Party’s nominating system is a hurdle to buying influence. ............................. 9 1. The Party’s nominating system gives the average citizen an opportunity to play a larger role in politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Republican Party Constitution 2017 Official Version
    Utah Republican Party Constitution 2017 Official Version PREAMBLE We, as members of the Utah Republican Party, grateful to Almighty God for life and liberty, desiring to perpetuate principles of free government and the blessings of liberty to our posterity, do establish and adopt this Constitution. This Constitution, the Party Bylaws, and Robert’s Rules of Order Current Edition are the exclusive governing rules of the Utah Republican Party. ARTICLE I NAME, PURPOSE AND MEMBERSHIP A. Name. The name of this organization shall be the Utah Republican Party, also referred to as the State Party or the Party. B. General Purposes. The Party shall nominate and support the election of Republican candidates in partisan races for public office, promote the principles set forth in the State Party Platform, and perform Party functions set forth in the election laws of the State of Utah and the Constitution and Bylaws of the Party. C. Membership. Party membership is open to any resident of the State of Utah who registers to vote as a Republican and complies with the Utah Republican Party Constitution and Bylaws, and membership may be further set forth in the Utah Republican Party Bylaws. ARTICLE II BYLAWS A. Bylaws. The State Central Committee may adopt Bylaws to govern subjects not covered by the Constitution. Such enactments shall not be inconsistent with this Constitution. B. Adoption and Modifications. 1. By the State Central Committee. Any Bylaw adopted or modified by the State Central Committee shall be binding and in full force and effect when adopted by a 2/3 vote of a quorum of the State Central Committee.
    [Show full text]