National Gypsum Product Reference Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Gypsum Product Reference Guide 09 20 00/NGC BuyLine 1100 National Gypsum Product Reference Guide ® NATIONAL GYPSUM PRODUCT REFERENCE GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Product Specification Directory............................................................1 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Taping Joint Compound..........................................33 Quick Selector for Fire and Sound Rated Systems ................................5 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Topping Joint Compound........................................33 Gypsum Plaster Partitions – Metal Lath..............................................5 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Texture Grade Joint Compound..............................33 Plaster Fireproofing Columns (10WF40 or heavier) ...........................6 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Sta-Smooth Joint Compound...................................34 Plaster Fireproofing Beams (8WF24 or heavier) .................................6 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Sta-Smooth Lite Joint Compound............................34 Veneer Plaster Partitions – Wood and Steel Framing .........................6 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Sta-Smooth HS Joint Compound.............................34 Gypsum Board Partitions – Wood Framing (Load-Bearing)................6 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Sta-Smooth FS 90 Compound.................................34 Gypsum Board Partitions – Steel Framing ..........................................8 09 29 00 Joint Tapes ...........................................................................................35 Gypsum Board Partitions – Steel Framing (Load-Bearing)................12 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Joint Tape................................................................35 Gypsum Board Partitions – Durasan Prefinished Gypsum Board .....12 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Fiberglass Mesh Tape..............................................35 Gypsum Board Partitions – Solid......................................................13 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Multi-Flex Tape Bead..............................................35 Gypsum Board Partitions – Shaftwalls, Area Sep. Walls ..................13 09 29 00 Surfacer/Primer ...................................................................................35 Gypsum Board Column Fireproofing ...............................................15 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Surfacer/Primer........................................................35 Gypsum Board Beam Fireproofing...................................................16 09 29 00 Texture Products .................................................................................36 Gypsum Board Floor/Ceilings – Wood Framing...............................16 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Perfect Spray ...........................................................36 Gypsum Board Roof/Ceilings – Wood Framing ...............................17 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Perfect Spray II ........................................................36 Gypsum Board Floor/Ceilings – Steel Framing.................................18 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Wall and Ceiling Spray ...........................................36 Gypsum Board Roof/Ceilings – Steel Framing..................................20 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Perfect Spray EM/HF ...............................................36 Gypsum Board Horizontal Shaftwall Duct Protection......................20 09 23 00 Conventional Plaster ............................................................................21 TRADEMARKS ® 09 23 00 Gold Bond BRAND Two-Way Hardwall Gypsum Plaster .................22 The following names are trademarks owned by National 09 23 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Gypsolite Plaster ................................................22 Gypsum Company or its subsidiary, National Gypsum 09 23 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Gypsum Gauging Plaster ...................................22 Properties, LLC: ® ® 09 23 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Gypsum Moulding Plaster .................................22 DURABASE KAL-KOTE ® ® 09 26 13 Veneer Plaster.......................................................................................23 DURASAN KAL-MESH EASY FINISH® MULTI-FLEX® 09 26 13 Kal-Kote BRAND Base Plaster .............................................................24 E-Z STRIP® NGC® 09 26 13 Kal-Kote BRAND Smooth Finish Plaster..............................................24 FIRE-SHIELD® 1-800 NATIONAL® 09 26 13 Kal-Kote BRAND Texture Finish Plaster ..............................................24 FIRE-SHIELD CTM PERFECT SPRAY® 09 26 13 Uni-Kal BRAND Veneer Plaster ..........................................................24 GOLD BOND® PERMABASE® 09 26 13 X-KALibur BRAND Veneer Plaster ......................................................24 GOLD BOND 54® PERMABASE FLEX® 09 29 00 Gypsum Board......................................................................................25 GRIDMARX® PROFORM® ® ® 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Gypsum Board...................................................26 GRIDSTONE SHAFTLINER ® ® 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND XP™ Gypsum Board..........................................26 GYPSOLITE SHAFTLINER XP HIGH FLEX® STA-SMOOTH® 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Fire-Shield Gypsum Board.................................26 HI-ABUSE® ULTRATM 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND XP™ Fire-Shield Gypsum Board........................27 HI-IMPACT® UNI-KAL® 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Sta-Smooth Gypsum Board................................27 KAL-KORE® X-KALIBUR® ® 09 29 00 Gold Bond BRAND SoundBreak Gypsum Board...............................27 KAL-KORNER BEAD® XP® 09 29 00 Kal Kore BRAND Plaster Base .............................................................27 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Gypsum Sheathing.............................................28 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Exterior Soffit Board ...........................................28 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Fire-Shield® Shaftliner ........................................28 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Fire-Shield® Shaftliner XP™ ...............................28 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND High Flex Gypsum Board ..................................29 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND High Strength Ceiling Board ..............................29 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Hi-Abuse® XP™ Fire-Shield Gypsum Board ........29 09 29 00 Gold Bond® BRAND Hi-Impact® XP™ Fire-Shield Gypsum Board .......29 09 29 00 Gridstone® BRAND Ceiling Panels......................................................30 09 29 00 Gridstone® BRAND CleanRoom Ceiling Panels ..................................30 09 29 00 Gridstone® BRAND Hi-Strength Ceiling Panels...................................30 Charlotte, North Carolina, is the home of the new 09 29 00 Joint Treatment....................................................................................32 National Gypsum Company. 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND All Purpose Joint Compound...................................32 National Gypsum Company is a fully integrated manufacturer and sup- 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Multi-Use Joint Compound.....................................32 plier of building and construction products worldwide. 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Lite Joint Compound ...............................................32 Our primary emphasis is on Gold Bond® BRAND gypsum gypsum board, 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND Ultra Joint Compound.............................................32 ProForm® BRAND joint treatment products and PermaBase® BRAND 09 29 00 ProForm BRAND XP Joint Compound ................................................33 cement board, in addition to plaster and framing systems. PRODUCT SPECIFICATION DIRECTORY GENERAL REFERENCE FOREWORD This directory is designed to provide a convenient, up-to-date This is to certify that the following materials comply in all GENERAL reference to some of the products marketed by National respects with listed specifications. REFERENCE Gypsum Company, and to the ASTM and Federal Specifications with which they comply. The General Services Administration has cancelled many Federal procurement documents. These have been superseded by ASTM Specifications. Federal Specifications are listed for reference. GYPSUM BOARD PRODUCTS Specification Standards Product Description and Use ASTM Federal Regular Gypsum Fire resistant. Will take decoration after proper C 1396 SS-L-30D Type III Board or Sta-Smooth surface preparation of interior walls and ceilings. XP Gypsum Board 1/2" (12.7 mm) gypsum board with a C 1396 SS-L-30D Type III moisture resistant gypsum core and mold/mildew resistant purple paper. Will take decoration after proper surface preparation of interior walls and ceilings. Fire-Shield Gypsum 1/2" (12.7 mm) and 5/8" (15.9 mm) gypsum C 1396 SS-L-30D Type III Board (Includes “C”) board with specially processed core highly Type X Grade X resistant to fire; type X core. XP Fire-Shield Gypsum 1/2" (12.7 mm) and 5/8" (15.9 mm) gypsum C 1396 SS-L-30D Type III Board (Includes “C”) board with a moisture resistant gypsum Type X Grade X core highly resistant to fire and mold/mildew resistant purple paper; type X core. Foil Back Standard gypsum board with aluminum foil C 1396 SS-L-30D Type III Gypsum Board on backside providing vapor retarder for interior Form C walls and ceilings. Soundbreak 5/8" (15.9mm) acoustically enhanced gypsum board C 1396 SS-L-30D Type III Gypsum Board used in construction of high rated STC assemblies. Fire-Shield Shaftliner 1" (25.4 mm) thick, 2' (610 mm) wide, for solid C 1396 SS-L-30D Type IV (Includes XP) partitions, shaft walls and Area Separation Walls; Type X Grade X type X core. Regular or Fire-Shield Gypsum board with extra resistance to C 1396 None Exterior Soffit
Recommended publications
  • The HERACLES View of the H -To-HI Ratio in Galaxies
    The HERACLES View of the H2-to-HI Ratio in Galaxies Adam Leroy (NRAO, Hubble Fellow) Fabian Walter, Frank Bigiel, the HERACLES and THINGS teams The Saturday Morning Summary • Star formation rate vs. gas relation on ~kpc scales breaks apart into: A relatively universal CO-SFR relation in nearby disks Systematic environmental scalings in the CO-to-HI ratio • The CO-to-HI ratio is a strong function of radius, total gas, and stellar surface density correlated with ISM properties: dust-to-gas ratio, pressure harder to link to dynamics: gravitational instability, arms • Interpretation: the CO-to-HI ratio traces the efficiency of GMC formation Density and dust can explain much of the observed behavior heracles Fabian Walter Erik Rosolowsky MPIA UBC Frank Bigiel Eva Schinnerer UC Berkeley THINGS plus… MPIA Elias Brinks Antonio Usero Gaelle Dumas U Hertfordshire OAN, Madrid MPIA Erwin de Blok Andreas Schruba Helmut Wiesemeyer U Cape Town IRAM … MPIA Rob Kennicutt Axel Weiss Karl Schuster Cambridge MPIfR IRAM Barry Madore Carsten Kramer Karin Sandstrom Carnegie IRAM MPIA Michele Thornley Daniela Calzetti Kelly Foyle Bucknell UMass MPIA Collaborators The HERA CO-Line Extragalactic Survey First maps Leroy et al. (2009) • IRAM 30m Large Program to map CO J = 2→1 line • Instrument: HERA receiver array operating at 230 GHz • 47 galaxies: dwarfs to starbursts and massive spirals -2 • Very wide-field (~ r25) and sensitive (σ ~ 1-2 Msun pc ) NGS The HI Nearby Galaxy Survey HI Walter et al. (2008), AJ Special Issue (2008) • VLA HI maps of 34 galaxies:
    [Show full text]
  • Big Halpha Kinematical Sample of Barred Spiral Galaxies - I
    BhaBAR: Big Halpha kinematical sample of BARred spiral galaxies - I. Fabry-Perot Observations of 21 galaxies O. Hernandez, C. Carignan, P. Amram, L. Chemin, O. Daigle To cite this version: O. Hernandez, C. Carignan, P. Amram, L. Chemin, O. Daigle. BhaBAR: Big Halpha kinematical sample of BARred spiral galaxies - I. Fabry-Perot Observations of 21 galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy P - Oxford Open Option A, 2005, 360 Issue 4, pp.1201. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09125.x. hal-00014446 HAL Id: hal-00014446 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00014446 Submitted on 26 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 360, 1201–1230 (2005) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09125.x BHαBAR: big Hα kinematical sample of barred spiral galaxies – I. Fabry–Perot observations of 21 galaxies O. Hernandez,1,2 † C. Carignan,1 P. Amram,2 L. Chemin1 and O. Daigle1 1Observatoire du mont Megantic,´ LAE, Universitede´ Montreal,´ CP 6128 succ. centre ville, Montreal,´ Quebec,´ Canada H3C 3J7 2Observatoire Astronomique de Marseille Provence et LAM, 2 pl.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Continuum and CO Emission in Star-Forming Galaxies
    A&A 385, 412–424 (2002) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020140 & c ESO 2002 Astrophysics Radio continuum and CO emission in star-forming galaxies M. Murgia1,A.Crapsi1,2, L. Moscadelli3, and L. Gregorini1,4 1 Istituto di Radioastronomia del CNR, Via Gobetti 101, 40129, Bologna, Italy 2 Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125, Firenze, Italy 3 Osservatorio Astronomico di Cagliari, Loc. Poggio dei Pini, Strada 54, 09012 Capoterra (CA), Italy 4 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Bologna, Via B. Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy Received 30 October 2001 / Accepted 23 January 2002 Abstract. We combine the radio continuum images from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey with the CO-line observations from the extragalactic CO survey of the Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory to study the relationship between molecular gas and the star formation rate within the disks of 180 spiral galaxies at 4500 resolution. We find a tight correlation between these quantities. On average, the ratio between the radio continuum and the CO emission is constant, within a factor of 3, both inside the same galaxy and from galaxy to galaxy. The mean star formation efficiency deduced from the radio continuum corresponds to convert 3.5% of the available molecular gas into stars on a time scale of 108 yr and depends weakly on general galaxy properties, such as Hubble type or nuclear activity. A comparison is made with another similar analysis performed using the Hα luminosity as star formation indicator. The overall agreement we find between the two studies reinforces the use of the radio luminosity as star formation rate indicator not only on global but also on local scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminous Blue Variables
    Review Luminous Blue Variables Kerstin Weis 1* and Dominik J. Bomans 1,2,3 1 Astronomical Institute, Faculty for Physics and Astronomy, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany 2 Department Plasmas with Complex Interactions, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany 3 Ruhr Astroparticle and Plasma Physics (RAPP) Center, 44801 Bochum, Germany Received: 29 October 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 29 February 2020 Abstract: Luminous Blue Variables are massive evolved stars, here we introduce this outstanding class of objects. Described are the specific characteristics, the evolutionary state and what they are connected to other phases and types of massive stars. Our current knowledge of LBVs is limited by the fact that in comparison to other stellar classes and phases only a few “true” LBVs are known. This results from the lack of a unique, fast and always reliable identification scheme for LBVs. It literally takes time to get a true classification of a LBV. In addition the short duration of the LBV phase makes it even harder to catch and identify a star as LBV. We summarize here what is known so far, give an overview of the LBV population and the list of LBV host galaxies. LBV are clearly an important and still not fully understood phase in the live of (very) massive stars, especially due to the large and time variable mass loss during the LBV phase. We like to emphasize again the problem how to clearly identify LBV and that there are more than just one type of LBVs: The giant eruption LBVs or h Car analogs and the S Dor cycle LBVs.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0309446V1 16 Sep 2003 N Necocigmlclrcod(..Mk38 Eke Al
    The Neutral ISM in Starburst Galaxies ASP Conference Series, Vol. xxx, 2003 S. Aalto, S. H¨uttemeister, A. Pedlar Extragalactic water masers in bright IRAS sources A. Tarchi1,2, C. Henkel3, A.B. Peck4, N. Nagar5, L. Moscadelli2, and K.M. Menten3 1Instituto di Radioastronomia, CNR, Bologna, Italy 2Osservatorio Astronomico di Cagliari, Capoterra (CA), Italy 3MPIfR, Bonn, Germany 4Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, SMA Project, Hilo, HI, USA 5Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands Abstract. We report the results of a search for 22 GHz water maser emission in IRAS-bright galaxies, using the 100-m Effelsberg telescope. In particular, we present the details of four new maser detections (IC 342, NGC 2146, NGC 3556, and Arp 299) and follow-up interferometric stud- ies. A comparison between water maser detection rates derived in the present study and those in previous similar surveys is also presented. 1. Introduction To date, there is evidence for a total of three distinct classes of extragalactic H2O masers: i) H2O megamasers (with isotropic luminosities Liso > 10 L⊙) associated with accretion disks in active galaxies (e.g. NGC 4258, Miyoshi et al. 1995) ii) H2O megamasers resulting from an interaction between the nuclear radio jet and an encroaching molecular cloud (e.g. Mrk 348, Peck et al. 2001, 2003) iii) weaker H2O masers, the ‘kilomasers’ (with Liso < 10 L⊙), often associated with prominent star forming regions in large scale galactic disks, and, thus far arXiv:astro-ph/0309446v1 16 Sep 2003 found in galaxies containing bright IRAS (Infrared Astronomical Satellite) point sources (e.g. NGC 2146, Tarchi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Photo-Ionization Models of NGC 2363 and Their Implications
    Wolf-Rayet Phenomena in Massive Stars and Starburst Galaxies Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 193, @1999 IAU K.A. van der Hucht, G. Koenigsberger f3 P.R.J. Eenens, eds. Photo-ionization models of NGC 2363 and their implications Valentina Luridiana and Manuel Peimbert Instituto de Astronomic, UNAM, Mexico Claus Leitherer Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. Abstract. We compute photo-ionization models for the giant extragalactic H II region NGC 2363, and compare them with optical observational data. We focus on the following observational constraints: F(Hj3), Ni; EW(Hj3), and the ratios of I(A 5007), I(A 4363), I(A 3727), I(A 6300), I(A 6720) and I(A 4686) rel- ative to I(Hj3). We discuss the variations of the emission spectra obtained with different input parameters. We show that low metallicity models (Z == 0.10 Zev) cannot reproduce the observed features of the spectrum, and that the disagree- ment can be satisfactorily overcome by allowing for spatial temperature fluctu- ations in the nebula. Accordingly, we show that the metallicity of NGC 2363 has most probably been underestimated, and that a value of Z ~ 0.25 Zev is in better agreement with the observational data than the usually adopted value Z ~ 0.10 Zev. We also derive values for the slope and the high mass end of the IMF, as well as the age of the stellar cluster. 1. Introduction NGC 2363 is a very luminous giant H II region, located in the south-west end of the irregular galaxy NGC 2366. It is one of the brightest extragalactic H II re- 6 gions known, with an estimated mass of about 2.2 x 10 M0 (Carigi & Peimbert 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make $1000 with Your Telescope! – 4 Stargazers' Diary
    Fort Worth Astronomical Society (Est. 1949) February 2010 : Astronomical League Member Club Calendar – 2 Opportunities & The Sky this Month – 3 How to Make $1000 with your Telescope! – 4 Astronaut Sally Ride to speak at UTA – 4 Aurgia the Charioteer – 5 Stargazers’ Diary – 6 Bode’s Galaxy by Steve Tuttle 1 February 2010 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 Algol at Minima Last Qtr Moon Æ 5:48 am 11:07 pm Top ten binocular deep-sky objects for February: M35, M41, M46, M47, M50, M93, NGC 2244, NGC 2264, NGC 2301, NGC 2360 Top ten deep-sky objects for February: M35, M41, M46, M47, M50, M93, NGC 2261, NGC 2362, NGC 2392, NGC 2403 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Algol at Minima Morning sports a Moon at Apogee New Moon Æ super thin crescent (252,612 miles) 8:51 am 7:56 pm Moon 8:00 pm 3RF Star Party Make use of the New Moon Weekend for . better viewing at the Dark Sky Site See Notes Below New Moon New Moon Weekend Weekend 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Presidents Day 3RF Star Party Valentine’s Day FWAS Traveler’s Guide Meeting to the Planets UTA’s Maverick Clyde Tombaugh Ranger 8 returns Normal Room premiers on Speakers Series discovered Pluto photographs and NatGeo 7pm Sally Ride “Fat Tuesday” Ash Wednesday 80 years ago. impacts Moon. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Algol at Minima First Qtr Moon Moon at Perigee Å (222,345 miles) 6:42 pm 12:52 am 4 pm {Low in the NW) Algol at Minima Æ 9:43 pm Challenge binary star for month: 15 Lyncis (Lynx) Challenge deep-sky object for month: IC 443 (Gemini) Notable carbon star for month: BL Orionis (Orion) 28 Notes: Full Moon Look for a very thin waning crescent moon perched just above and slightly right of tiny Mercury on the morning of 10:38 pm Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Du Ciel Profond
    Guide du ciel profond Olivier PETIT 8 mai 2004 2 Introduction hjjdfhgf ghjfghfd fg hdfjgdf gfdhfdk dfkgfd fghfkg fdkg fhdkg fkg kfghfhk Table des mati`eres I Objets par constellation 21 1 Androm`ede (And) Andromeda 23 1.1 Messier 31 (La grande Galaxie d'Androm`ede) . 25 1.2 Messier 32 . 27 1.3 Messier 110 . 29 1.4 NGC 404 . 31 1.5 NGC 752 . 33 1.6 NGC 891 . 35 1.7 NGC 7640 . 37 1.8 NGC 7662 (La boule de neige bleue) . 39 2 La Machine pneumatique (Ant) Antlia 41 2.1 NGC 2997 . 43 3 le Verseau (Aqr) Aquarius 45 3.1 Messier 2 . 47 3.2 Messier 72 . 49 3.3 Messier 73 . 51 3.4 NGC 7009 (La n¶ebuleuse Saturne) . 53 3.5 NGC 7293 (La n¶ebuleuse de l'h¶elice) . 56 3.6 NGC 7492 . 58 3.7 NGC 7606 . 60 3.8 Cederblad 211 (N¶ebuleuse de R Aquarii) . 62 4 l'Aigle (Aql) Aquila 63 4.1 NGC 6709 . 65 4.2 NGC 6741 . 67 4.3 NGC 6751 (La n¶ebuleuse de l’œil flou) . 69 4.4 NGC 6760 . 71 4.5 NGC 6781 (Le nid de l'Aigle ) . 73 TABLE DES MATIERES` 5 4.6 NGC 6790 . 75 4.7 NGC 6804 . 77 4.8 Barnard 142-143 (La tani`ere noire) . 79 5 le B¶elier (Ari) Aries 81 5.1 NGC 772 . 83 6 le Cocher (Aur) Auriga 85 6.1 Messier 36 . 87 6.2 Messier 37 . 89 6.3 Messier 38 .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1704.01678V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 28 Jul 2017 Been Notoriously Difficult, Resulting Mostly in Upper Lim- Highest Escape Fractions Measured to Date Among Low- Its (E.G
    Submitted: 3 March 2017 Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0 MRK 71 / NGC 2366: THE NEAREST GREEN PEA ANALOG Genoveva Micheva1, M. S. Oey1, Anne E. Jaskot2, and Bethan L. James3 (Accepted 24 July 2017) 1University of Michigan, 311 West Hall, 1085 S. University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1107, USA 2Department of Astronomy, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA 3STScI, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA ABSTRACT We present the remarkable discovery that the dwarf irregular galaxy NGC 2366 is an excellent analog of the Green Pea (GP) galaxies, which are characterized by extremely high ionization parameters. The similarities are driven predominantly by the giant H II region Markarian 71 (Mrk 71). We compare the system with GPs in terms of morphology, excitation properties, specific star-formation rate, kinematics, absorption of low-ionization species, reddening, and chemical abundance, and find consistencies throughout. Since extreme GPs are associated with both candidate and confirmed Lyman continuum (LyC) emitters, Mrk 71/NGC 2366 is thus also a good candidate for LyC escape. The spatially resolved data for this object show a superbubble blowout generated by mechanical feedback from one of its two super star clusters (SSCs), Knot B, while the extreme ionization properties are driven by the . 1 Myr-old, enshrouded SSC Knot A, which has ∼ 10 times higher ionizing luminosity. Very massive stars (> 100 M ) may be present in this remarkable object. Ionization-parameter mapping indicates the blowout region is optically thin in the LyC, and the general properties also suggest LyC escape in the line of sight.
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble Sights Galaxy Stuck in the Middle 30 April 2018
    Hubble sights galaxy stuck in the middle 30 April 2018 from Earth in the constellation of Camelopardalis (the Giraffe). Camelopardalis contains many other interesting deep-sky objects, including the open cluster NGC 1502, the elegant Kemble's Cascade asterism, and the starburst galaxy NGC 2146. Provided by NASA Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, A. Fillipenko This pretty, cloud-like object may not look much like a galaxy—it lacks the well-defined arms of a spiral galaxy, or the reddish bulge of an elliptical—but it is in fact something known as a lenticular galaxy. Lenticular galaxies sit somewhere between the spiral and elliptical types; they are disk-shaped, like spirals, but they no longer form large numbers of new stars and thus contain only aging populations of stars, like ellipticals. NGC 2655's core is extremely luminous, resulting in its additional classification as a Seyfert galaxy: a type of active galaxy with strong and characteristic emission lines. This luminosity is thought to be produced as matter is dragged onto the accretion disk of a supermassive black hole sitting at the center of NGC 2655. The structure of NGC 2655's outer disk, on the other hand, appears calmer, but it is oddly shaped. The complex dynamics of the gas in the galaxy suggest that it may have had a turbulent past, including mergers and interactions with other galaxies. NGC 2655 is located about 80 million light-years 1 / 2 APA citation: Hubble sights galaxy stuck in the middle (2018, April 30) retrieved 28 September 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2018-04-hubble-sights-galaxy-stuck-middle.html This document is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Stellar Winds Account for Temperature Fluctuations in H II
    A&A 379, 1017–1023 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011364 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics Can stellar winds account for temperature fluctuations in H II regions? The case of NGC 2363 V. Luridiana1,2,M.Cervi˜no3, and L. Binette2 1 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching b. M¨unchen, Germany 2 Instituto de Astronom´ıa, Universidad Nacional Aut´onoma de M´exico, Ap. Postal 70-264, 04510 M´exico D.F., Mexico 3 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur extraterrestrische Physik, Gießenbachstraße, 85748 Garching b. M¨unchen, Germany Received 13 August 2001 / Accepted 25 September 2001 Abstract. We compare the rate of kinetic energy injected by stellar winds into the extragalactic Hiiregion NGC 2363 to the luminosity needed to feed the observed temperature fluctuations. The kinetic luminosity asso- ciated to the winds is estimated by means of two different evolutionary synthesis codes, one of which takes into account the statistical fluctuations expected in the Initial Mass Function. We find that, even in the most favorable conditions considered by our model, such luminosity is much smaller than the luminosity needed to account for the observed temperature fluctuations. The assumptions underlying our study are emphasized as possible sources of uncertainty affecting our results. Key words. Hiiregions – ISM: individual (NGC 2366, NGC 2363) – stars: clusters 1. Introduction For a long time, the only way temperature fluctua- tions were accounted for in theoretical models was ac- The presence of temperature fluctuations in photoionized knowledging the impossibility to reproduce the observed regions has been a matter of debate since the pioneer- intensity of the most affected lines; see, e.g., Luridiana ing work by Peimbert (1967).
    [Show full text]
  • The Outermost Hii Regions of Nearby Galaxies
    THE OUTERMOST HII REGIONS OF NEARBY GALAXIES by Jessica K. Werk A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Astronomy and Astrophysics) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Mario L. Mateo, Co-Chair Associate Professor Mary E. Putman, Co-Chair, Columbia University Professor Fred C. Adams Professor Lee W. Hartmann Associate Professor Marion S. Oey Professor Gerhardt R. Meurer, University of Western Australia Jessica K. Werk Copyright c 2010 All Rights Reserved To Mom and Dad, for all your love and encouragement while I was taking up space. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I owe a deep debt of gratitude to a long list of individuals, institutions, and substances that have seen me through the last six years of graduate school. My first undergraduate advisor in Astronomy, Kathryn Johnston, was also my first Astronomy Professor. She piqued my interest in the subject from day one with her enthusiasm and knowledge. I don’t doubt that I would be studying something far less interesting if it weren’t for her. John Salzer, my next and last undergraduate advisor, not only taught me so much about observing and organization, but also is responsible for convincing me to go on in Astronomy. Were it not for John, I’d probably be making a lot more money right now doing something totally mind-numbing and soul-crushing. And Laura Chomiuk, a fellow Wesleyan Astronomy Alumnus, has been there for me through everything − problem sets and personal heartbreak alike. To know her as a friend, goat-lover, and scientist has meant so much to me over the last 10 years, that confining my gratitude to these couple sentences just seems wrong.
    [Show full text]