Referendum Initiative

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Referendum Initiative 1 2 Politische Bildung und Studien in Südtirol Centro sudtirolese di formazione e studi politici Zenter de stude y de formazion politica dl Südtirol South Tyrol's Center for Political Studies and Civic Education Impressum When citizens decide by themselves An introduction to direct democracy © Thomas Benedikter February 2021 Author: Dr. Thomas Benedikter Proofreading: Dr. Hanna Battisti Editor: POLITiS - South Tyrol’s Center for Political Studies and Civic Education, Weinstr. 60 - I-39057 Eppan – Tel. +39 324 5810427 [email protected] - www.politis.it ISBN 978 88 7106 515 1 The CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence used by POLITiS stipulates that copying and distribution are only permitted if the name of the author is mentioned, if the distribution is not for commercial purposes and if no editing, alteration or modification is made. You are free to copy and distribute the work under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author. Non commercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. More Information: www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 3 Thomas Benedikter When citizens decide by themselves An introduction to direct democracy With a preface by Andreas Gross POLITiS e-book 4 Content Preface (Andreas Gross) 7 Developing the citizens’ political creativity and commitment 1 Happier with direct democracy? 11 What does ‘direct democracy’ actually mean? 2 The unfinished democracy 19 The plebiscite: a popular vote ordered from above 3 The myth of the incompetent citizen 31 Populism and direct democracy 4 A veto right in the hand of the citizens: the referendum 42 The petition in a modern guise 5 When citizens initiate laws: the popular initiative 49 Italy: Unnecessary ‘citizens’ draft bills’? 6 The design of direct democracy 61 Postal voting 7 Who takes the field? The actors of direct democracy 74 The media and direct democracy 8 The performance of direct democracy: quality and 85 effects A decalogue against the turnout quorum 5 9 Will elected politicians be dismantled? Objections to 97 direct democracy Direct versus deliberative democracy 10 Switzerland: the cradle of direct democracy 119 Which reforms for the Swiss ‘popular rights’? 11 Direct democracy also in the European Union? 134 The costs of representative politics and direct democracy 12 Direct democracy at the service of a more sustainable 147 tax system Participatory budgeting 13 A model on the rise: direct democracy in the world 160 A century of direct democracy in California 14 Digital democracy and direct democracy 172 With CONSUL to digital citizens’ participation 15 Conclusion: Citizens can decide for and by themselves 187 Space for utopia - Direct democracy in 2040 Basic glossary 196 References and further resources 201 The author and the editor 206 6 Cover foto: The Landsgemeinde of Canton Glarus in Switzerland, 3 May 2009 Since 1403, the men of the canton of Appenzell-Innerrhoden have been meeting every last Sunday in April, armed with sabres, to decide on new cantonal laws. Since 1990, in the Canton of Glarus also women (without sabres), who have been voting in Switzerland in general since 1971, have also been allowed to vote. The traditional 'Landsgemeinde', a legislative assembly of the canton's citizens in the open air. It still exists in the canton of Glarus and in Appenzell-Innerrhoden. This form of assembly democracy, which was typical for medieval Switzerland, has, however, been replaced in all the other cantons by referendums at the ballot box or by post. In a large number of Swiss communes, general communal assemblies are held every year, in which the citizens vote directly on essential issues of their commune's policy. Source of the picture: WIKIPEDIA, http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/extra/mydiscuss/display/16944106 Author: Marc Schlumpf Tables and figures 1 Popular referendum rights (direct democracy) – Overview 2 Referendum and initiative: the procedures 3 Popular votes at federal level in Switzerland 1848-2012 4 Popular votes around the world 5 The 30 “top countries” for the application of direct democracy 6 Citizens’ initiatives worldwide 7 Popular referendums around the world 7 Preface Developing the citizens’ political creativity and commitment By Andreas Gross If a young man of 18 was discovered to be a great football talent, but instead of playing he could only once a week choose which match to watch as a spectator while watching players mostly less good than him, it would be a frustrating experience for him, and local football would let a great sporting potential shrink. The same is true today for most citizens in Italy and in many other countries. Many citizens are politically well-prepared, well-informed, can assess political developments, can form a well-founded opinion and would like to cooperate on political issues. However, because they do not want to join a party, they feel excluded from everyday political activity. Every five years they can choose from a very limited number of parties, groups with limited responsibility for keeping their promises made before the elections. Between two elections, which are rare and ephemeral moments of democracy, decisions are made only about them, never with them. This is frustrating for the individual citizen, it excludes him from political life, it limits individual and collective political learning processes. It does not allow society to unfold the potential for creativity and free political engagement that is present in every society. The consequences are fatal. Citizens, who already feel excluded or undervalued by democracy at regional and national level, will lack the strength and the will to actively confront the great democratic challenges of the next 20 years: the establishment of a truly democratic system, at national but also at transnational level. A plea for more referendum rights in the hands of the citizens is never a plea against representative democracy. This would be a major misunderstanding, often deliberately peddled in political debate. Elements of direct democracy make the representative democracy even 8 more representative, since members of parliament in this way know best who they represent, what the citizens they are called upon to represent think and prefer. Direct democracy is also not to be confused with plebiscitary democracy, as is often the case in order to discredit institutionalised referendum rights. In fact, there is an essential difference: in direct democracy, we have a qualified minority of citizens (in Zurich less than 1 percent of those entitled to vote, in Switzerland generally between 1 and 2 per cent, in California with its 39.5 million inhabitants between 3 and 5 percent) who have the right to bring laws or changes to the Constitution decided by parliament to a popular vote, and they can also submit their own proposals for ordinary and constitutional law. In a system with plebiscite voting, these rights are vested only in a few institutional bodies: in France in the president of the republic, in Australia in the parliament, in Denmark the Constitution lays down exhaustively on which issues the citizens must be consulted. Finally, in dictatorial systems, despots such as Napoleon III, Hitler, Pinochet and so on appropriated this privilege in order to gain some legitimacy they did not have on the basis of the consent of a democratically elected parliament. As a rule, plebiscitary elements are not very democratic and only complement an authoritarian system of government. Direct-democratic rights, on the other hand, are rights that complement representative democracy, increase citizens' freedom of action, demonopolise political decisions, distribute part of the political power and profoundly transform political culture. It is decisive that a minority of citizens can request such a popular vote at any time by following the procedure laid down, i.e. the right to question all fellow citizens on a specific issue or rule, before it comes into force as a legal norm. This is the pivot for transforming political culture, i.e. the right of a minority of citizens to be able to address all citizens with a precise and specific question. It is direct democracy that provides this right, which allows political minorities to articulate their own proposals. They can 9 put issues on the public agenda that would otherwise be ignored or passed over in silence. This also transforms the structure of the media and the political debate itself. If everyone has a voice in politics, everyone must feel interested and taken seriously. Because democracy does not only mean the right to articulate an opinion, it should also allow a serious proposal to be heard, discussed, taken into consideration. Direct democracy reduces hierarchies because it increases the possibilities of binding political action by citizens. Because many more people are politically active, there is more public debate on many different issues and in many different places. And this means that many more people can inform themselves, understand and participate. So it is justified to say that a society with direct democracy can develop its political potential better than a political system in which only politicians rule. We all know that this is precisely the challenge if we want to create a lifelong learning society with a more participatory democracy. The Swiss experience with direct democracy since 1866 has shown precisely this: anyone who considers direct democracy to be a democratisation of democracy must pay close attention to its concrete regulation in institutional and procedural terms. Unlike the regulations currently in force in many countries, the number of signatures to be collected must be small and the method of collection must be simple.
Recommended publications
  • Procedures of Ratification of Mixed Agreements
    Directorate-General for the Presidency Relations with National Parliaments Legislative Dialogue Unit National Parliaments Background Briefing (November 2016) PROCEDURES OF RATIFICATION OF MIXED AGREEMENTS SUMMARY NATIONAL/FEDERAL REGIONAL POSSIBLE COUNTRY LEVEL LEVEL REFERENDUM Approval Chambers Approval Austria (AT) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✔ Belgium (BE) ✔ 2/2 ✔ ✘ Bulgaria (BG) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✔ Croatia (HR) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✔ Cyprus (CY) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ Czech Republic (CZ) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✘ Denmark (DK) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✔ Estonia (EE) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ Finland (FI) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ France (FR) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✔ Germany (DE) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✘ Greece (EL) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✔ Hungary (HU) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ Ireland (IE) ✔ 1/2 ✘ ✔ Italy (IT) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✘ Latvia (LV) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ Lithuania (LT) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✔ Luxembourg (LU) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ Malta (MT) ✘ 0/1 ✘ ✘ The Netherlands (NL) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✔ Poland (PL) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✔ Portugal (PT) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ Romania (RO) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✔ Slovakia (SK) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✔ Slovenia (SI) ✔ 1/2 ✘ ✘ Spain (ES) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✘ Sweden (SE) ✔ 1/1 ✘ ✘ United Kingdom (UK) ✔ 2/2 ✘ ✔ 27/28 Member States 14/28 TOTAL 1 Member State 38/41 Federal Chambers Member States [email protected] B-1047 Brussels - Tel. +32 2 28 43821 SOURCES NOTE: The information provided in this document is the product of research into national constitutions of EU Member States, institutional documents, an academic study (Eschbach, Anna, University of Cologne, The Ratification Process in EU Member States, 2015), and information provided by representatives of the EU’s 28 national parliaments in November 2016. NATIONAL PROCEDURES OF MIXED AGREEMENT RATIFICATION Bicameral: National Council, Federal Council AUSTRIA (AT) Regional parliaments: n/a Overview: ­ The National Council in cooperation with the Federal Council must approve the ratification of the majority of mixed agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggles Around Water Utilities Privatisation in the Upper Arno Water District, Italy
    New waters or old boys network? Struggles around water Utilities Privatisation in the Upper Arno Water District, Italy M.Sc. Minor Thesis by Rossella Alba January 2013 Irrigation and Water Engineering Group Title page pictures were taken during field work in the Upper Arno water district (September 2012). New waters or old boys network? Struggles around Water Utilities Privatisation in the Upper Arno Water District, Italy Minor thesis Irrigation and Water Engineering submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science in International Land and Water Management at Wageningen University, the Netherlands Rosella Alba January 2013 Supervisors: Dr.ir. Rutgerd Boelens Irrigation and Water Engineering Group Wageningen University The Netherlands www.iwe.wur.nl/uk Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, Rutgerd Boelens, that encouraged me during the research and stimulated my critical thinking. Thank you to all the people that took part to this research for sharing with me their stories, experiences and opinions. I would like to thank the members of the Comitato Acqua Pubblica for their enthusiastic collaboration with this project. Thank you to Eva, Stefano and all my friends that supported me during the months that followed my field work. A special thanks to Giacomo for his suggestions and sharp comments on my work. Ultimately, I would like to express my gratitude to my family for their encouragement and support to my project. II Table of Contents Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Independent Commission on Referendums
    Report of the Independent Commission on Referendums INDEPENDENT COMMISSION ON July 2018 REFERENDUMS ISBN: 978-1-903903- 83-4 Published by the Constitution Unit School of Public Policy University College London 29-31 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit ©The Constitution Unit, UCL July 2018 This report is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published July 2018 1 Report of the Independent Commission on Referendums INDEPENDENT COMMISSION ON REFERENDUMS 2 Report of the Independent Commission on Referendums 3 Contents Lists of Tables, Figures and Boxes 4 Foreword 5 Commission members 6 Commission Secretariat 8 Executive Summary 9 Introduction 13 Part 1: Background Chapter 1 – The Use of Referendums Worldwide 19 Chapter 2 – The Use of Referendums in the UK 31 Chapter 3 – Regulating Referendums: History and Debates 47 Part 2: The Role of Referendums in Democracy Chapter 4 – Referendums and Democracy 57 Chapter 5 – Calling Referendums 71 Chapter 6 – Legislating for a Referendum 81 Chapter 7 – Preparation for a Referendum 90 Chapter 8 – The Referendum Question 101 Chapter 9 – Thresholds and Other Safeguards 110 Part 3: The Regulation of Referendum Campaigns Chapter 10 – The Role of Government in Referendum Campaigns 123 Chapter 11 – Lead Campaigners 134 Chapter 12 – Campaign Finance 145 Chapter 13 – Quality of Discourse 159 Chapter 14 – Regulation of Online Campaigning 178 Part 4: Implementation Chapter 15 – Implementing the Commission’s Recommendations 192 Conclusions and Recommendations 201 Appendix: List of Responses to Expert Consultation 210 Reference list 211 4 Report of the Independent Commission on Referendums List of Tables, Figures and Boxes LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF BOXES 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tides of Vatican Influence in Italian Reproductive Matters
    RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION The Tides of Vatican Influence in Italian Reproductive Matters: From Abortion to Assisted Reproduction Erica DiMarco 0 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 PART I. HISTORY........................................................................................................................ 3 A. The Interplay Between Italy and the Vatican ...................................................................3 B. Changing Power Dynamics ..............................................................................................5 Part II. Abortion – an ebb in influence............................................................................................ 6 A. Introduction ......................................................................................................................6 B. Law 194 ............................................................................................................................ 7 C. Catholic teachings and opposition to the abortion law.....................................................9 D. Attempt to Reform..........................................................................................................12 E. After the Failure of the Church to overcome Abortion Legislation ...............................13 Part III. Assisted Reproduction – Flood of Vatican Influence......................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Quorum and Turnout in Referenda
    QUORUM AND TURNOUT IN REFERENDA HELIOS HERRERAy, ANDREA MATTOZZIz Abstract. We analyze the e¤ect of turnout requirements in ref- erenda in the context of a group turnout model. We show that a participation quorum requirement may reduce the turnout so severely that it generates a “quorum paradox”: in equilibrium, the expected turnout exceeds the participation quorum only if this re- quirement is not imposed. Moreover, a participation quorum does not necessarily imply a bias for the status quo. We also show that in order to induce a given expected turnout, the quorum should be set at a level that is lower than half the target, and the e¤ect of a participation quorum on welfare is ambiguous. On the one hand, the quorum decreases voters’welfare by misrepresenting the will of the majority. On the other hand, it might also reduce the total cost of voting. Finally, we show that an approval quorum is essentially equivalent to a participation quorum. Keywords: Quorum, Referendum, Group Turnout, Direct Demo- cracy. JEL Classi…cation: D72 Date: First Draft: November 2006; This Draft: 22nd July 2007. We bene…tted from discussions with Patrick Bolton, Alessandra Casella, Federico Echenique, Jacob Goeree, Daniela Iorio, Leeat Yariv, and seminar participants at several universities. All usual disclaimers apply. y SIPA and ITAM-CIE, <[email protected]>; z CalTech, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, <[email protected]>. 1 QUORUMANDTURNOUTINREFERENDA 2 “Last June, the church played a role in a referendum that sought to overturn parts of a restrictive law on in vitro fertilization [...]. To be valid, referendums in Italy need to attract the votes of more than half the electorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Paper
    Place-Based Campaigning: The Political Impact of Real Grassroots Mobilization Daniel Bischof Aarhus University & University of Zurich Thomas Kurer University of Konstanz & University of Zurich September 3, 2021 Abstract Generations of research have incrementally identified the circumstances under which electoral campaigns matter. Direct, interpersonal contact within local networks is commonly seen as con- ducive to campaign impact but empirical evidence is scarce due to demanding data require- ments. We advance the literature by studying the Movimento Cinque Stelle, an important chal- lenger party in Italy, which followed the unusual practice of coordinating all political activities on a public online platform. We webscraped the entire event history of the Movement’s more than 1,000 local branches with over 200,000 geocoded political activities to study the eect and mechanisms of their campaign against the 2016 constitutional referendum – a watershed moment in Italian politics. Relying on regression, matching, and instrumental variable models, we demonstrate substantial campaign eects. Our results indicate that social networks amplify the eectiveness of a campaign while highlighting both the continued relevance and the partic- ular potency of place-based political mobilization. word count abstract = 149; full manuscript (excluding abstract)= 10,728. Correspondence: [email protected]. We thank Tarik Abou-Chadi, Reto Bürgisser, Francesco Colombo, Elias Dinas, Sarah Engler, Florian Foos, Hanno Hilbig, Swen Hutter, Herbert Kitschelt, Hanspeter Kriesi, Arndt Leininger, Giorgio Malet, Tabea Palmtag, Nils Redeker, Tobias Rommel, Roman Senninger, Zeynep Somer-Topcu, Resul Umit, Kateřina Vráblíková, Vicente Valentim, Valerio Vignoli, Markus Wagner, and conference participants at EPSA 2019, APSA 2019, SVPW 2020, the Workshop on “Under pressure: Electoral and non-electoral participation in polarizing times”, and during an invited talk at the University of Gothenburg for helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemma Mateo González
    EUI WORKING PAPERS RSCAS No. 2006/32 Domestic Politics and Referendums on the Constitutional Treaty Gemma Mateo González EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Mateo cover.indd 1 05/10/2006 12:48:41 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Domestic Politics and Referendums on the Constitutional Treaty GEMMA MATEO GONZÁLEZ EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2006/32 BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO DI FIESOLE (FI) © 2006 Gemma Mateo González This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Any additional reproduction for such purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, require the consent of the author. Requests should be addressed directly to the author. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author, the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher. Any reproductions for other purposes require the consent of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. The author should inform the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the EUI if the paper will be published elsewhere and also take responsibility for any consequential obligation(s). ISSN 1028-3625 Printed in Italy in October 2006 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50016 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Publications/ http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/index.jsp Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies carries out disciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the areas of European integration and public policy in Europe. It hosts the annual European Forum. Details of this and the other research of the centre can be found on: http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Research/ Research publications take the form of Working Papers, Policy Papers, Distinguished Lectures and books.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Essays on the Role of Expectations in Business Cycles
    Aix-Marseille Université - École Doctorale de Sciences Économiques et de Gestion d’Aix-Marseille N°372 Faculté d’Économie et de Gestion Aix-Marseille School of Economics Numéro attribué par la bibliothèque a a a a a a a a a a Thèse pour le Doctorat ès Sciences Économiques Présentée et soutenue publiquement par Rémi VIVÈS le 25 novembre 2019 en vue de l’obtention du grade de docteur d’Aix-Marseille Université Three Essays on the Role of Expectations in Business Cycles Jury : Jess BENHABIB New York University, Rapporteur Frédéric DUFOURT Aix-Marseille University, Co-directeur de thèse Leonor MODESTO Portuguese Catholic University, Examinateur Céline POILLY Aix-Marseille University, Examinateur Alain VENDITTI Aix-Marseille University Co-directeur de thèse Bertrand WIGNIOLLE Paris School of Economics, Rapporteur ii L’université d’Aix-Marseille n’entend ni approuver, ni désapprouver les opinions particulières du candidat : Ces opinions doivent être considérées comme propres à leur auteur. iii iv For my family v vi Acknowledgments A thesis is not written alone. Many people contributed to the achievement of this work in many different ways. I thank them below. First, I am grateful to my advisors, mentors, and co-authors, Frédéric Dufourt and Alain Venditti (and Véro!). I would like to thank them for their comments and advice on innumer- able aspects of this thesis and their constant intellectual guidance. I would like to thank them, too, for their trust in me, their willingness to listen, and for sharing their own experiences as scholars and as people. I appreciate immensely the humanity and sensitivity they brought to their relationships with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Government by Referendum
    Government by referendum QVORTRUP 9781526130037 PRINT.indd 1 25/01/2018 15:15 ii POCKETPOCKET POLITICSPOLITICS SERIES EDITOR: BILL JONES SERIES EDITOR: BILL JONES Pocket politics presents short, pithy summaries of complex topicsPocket on politics socio- presents political issuesshort, pithyboth insummaries Britain and of overseas.complex Academicallytopics on socio-political sound, accessible issues bothand aimedin Britain at the and interested overseas. Academicallygeneral reader, sound, the accessibleseries will andaddress aimed a subject at the interested range includinggeneral political reader, ideas, the series economics, will address society, a subjectthe machinery range of includinggovernment political and international ideas, economics, issues. society, Unusually, the machineryperhaps, ofauthors government are encouraged, and international should issues.they choose, Unusually, to offer perhaps, their authorsown areconclusions encouraged, rather should than they strive choose, for mere to offeracademic their own conclusionsobjectivity. Therather series than will strive provide for mere stimulating academic intellectual objectivity. accessThe series to the will problems provide of stimulating the modern intellectual world in aaccess user- friendly to the problems of the modernformat. world in a user-friendly format. Previously published The TrumpPreviously revolt publishedEdward Ashbee ReformThe of Trumpthe House revolt of LordsEdward Philip Ashbee Norton Lobbying: An appraisal Wyn Grant Power in modern Russia: Strategy and mobilisation Andrew Monaghan Reform of the House of Lords Philip Norton QVORTRUP 9781526130037 PRINT.indd 2 25/01/2018 15:15 Government by referendum Matt Qvortrup Manchester University Press QVORTRUP 9781526130037 PRINT.indd 3 25/01/2018 15:15 Copyright © Matt Qvortrup 2018 The right of Matt Qvortrup to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Law
    Strasbourg, 3 July 2013 CDL-EL(2013)006 Or. Bil. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ELECTORAL LAW French version: Le droit électoral ISBN 978-92-871-6423-0 The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Public Information and Publications Division, Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). Cover design: Graphic Design Workshop, Council of Europe Council of Europe Publishing F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex http://book.coe.int ISBN 978-92-871-6424-7 © Council of Europe, May 2008 Printed at the Council of Europe 2 Contents General introduction ............................................................................................. Part 1 – Elections Code of good practice in electoral matters – Guidelines and explanatory report ................ Introduction ................................................................................................................................ Guidelines on elections .............................................................................................................. I. Principles of Europe’s electoral heritage ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Dullness
    Constitutional Dullness Marco Goldoni 2020-09-09T09:08:40 Should the number of Italy’s Members of Parliament (MPs) be reduced from 945 to 600? Italian citizens will decide on that question in a constitutional referendum that will take place in less than two weeks. While other referendums in Italian history have been vectors of remarkable civic mobilisation, this one fails to capture the constitutional imagination of Italian citizens. What could – and should – be a radical public debate about Italy’s political system and the current order, in fact revolves around pettiness and trivial constitutional engineering. Subject of the referendum Constitutional referendums in Italy are formally confirmative. Following the standard procedure set by art. 138 of the constitution, Italians will have to vote on the confirmation of the constitutional amendments that have been approved in two different votes by the Italian parliament. The amendments in question would change three articles (56, 57 and 59) of the constitution: The number of MPs in the lower chamber (Camera dei deputati) would be cut from 630 to 400 and the number of Senators in the higher chamber (Senato) from 315 to 200. Furthermore, MPs elected in foreign constituencies would also be reduced. Finally, art. 59 would be modified in order to make clear that no more than 5 senators can be appointed for life by the President of the Republic (the current version is ambiguous in that regard). This constitutional reform, originally advocated by the 5 Stars movement, has been supported and/or approved by vote by a vast majority of the political parties represented in Parliament, with some variations in the two voting sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes on Industrial Democracy in Italy. Para O Que
    ESTUDIOS HISTÓRICOS – CDHRPyB- Año IX – Julio - Diciembre 2017 - Nº 18 – ISSN: 1688 – 5317. Uruguay What was a workers’ referendum for? Research notes on industrial democracy in Italy. Para o que serviu um referendo dos trabalhadores? Notas de pesquisa sobre a democracia industrial na Itália Davide Carbonai1 Carlo Drago2 Abstract: In July 2007, the Prodi government and representatives of the three main Italian trade union confederations signed a landmark agreement on welfare and economic development. In October, in order to ratify or reject the agreement, the Italian labour movement organised a referendum, i.e. the Workers’ Referendum of 2007, inviting workers, pensioners and the unemployed to assess the agreement. Based on a comprehensive sampling these research notes provide an analysis of the Workers’ Referendum with regard to both key societal voting features and attitudes toward unions. The results signalized the profound changes in the forms of civic engagement and political culture that will take place in Italy ten years later. Keywords: Industrial democracy; Italy; Trade unionism, Referendum. ¿Para qué sirvió un referéndum de los trabajadores? Notas de investigación sobre la democracia industrial en Italia Resumen: En julio de 2007, el gobierno Prodi y representantes de las tres principales confederaciones sindicales italianas firmaron un acuerdo histórico sobre bienestar social y desarrollo económico. En octubre, para ratificar o rechazar el acuerdo, el movimiento laboral italiano organizó un referéndum (el Referéndum de los Trabajadores de 2007) invitando trabajadores, jubilados y desempleados a evaluar el acuerdo. Con base en una amplia muestra, estas notas de investigación proporcionan un análisis del Referendo en cuanto a las principales características de la votación y actitudes en relación al movimiento sindical.
    [Show full text]