Order Carnivora Suborder Fissipedia – the Fissipeds (Toes Separated From

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Order Carnivora Suborder Fissipedia – the Fissipeds (Toes Separated From Order Carnivora Suborder Fissipedia – the fissipeds (toes separated from one another) Creodonta (“mongoose”-size to “wolf”-size) Canidae Ursidae Procyonidae Mustelidae Felidae Viverridae Hyaenidae Superfamilies Arctoidea Aeluroidea (Eocene) Miacidae (Fissipedia) ??? (Early Tertiary) Creodonta (lack defined carnassials) General Characteristics: 1) Complex foot structure Digitigrade (walk on toes) = canids & felids Plantigrade (walk on soles with heels touching ground) = ursids, procyonids 1 2) Skull • Heavy, strong facial muscles • Large braincase 3) Jaw articulation • No side-to-side movement of lower jaw 4) Carnassials • Upper P4 & lower M1 • Highly developed in felids, poorly developed in ursids and procyonids Family Canidae – dogs Canis lupus (gray wolf) • Huge skull • Sharp and elongate carnassials • Massive molars • Canines do not extend below mental foramina • Broad palate/rostrum 2 Canis latrans (coyote) • Canines extend below mental foramina • Slender palate/rostrum • Flat skull wolf coyote Canis familiaris (dog) • Canines lack robustness • High arched skull Vulpes vulpes (red fox) • Sagittal ridges form V-shape on top of skull • Slender rostrum • Smaller than coyote • White tip on tail Urocyon cinereoargenteus (gray fox) • Black line on tail • Temporal ridges on top of skull form bell-lyre shape • Step in dentary • Salt & pepper gray, reddish brown, black, white 3 Family Ursidae – bears Ursus americanus (black bear) • Large skull • Huge bunodont molars/premolars • Anterior premolars vestigial • Posterior molars < 1 inch in length Family Mustelidae – weasels Martes pennanti (fisher) • 38 teeth • Long body (~2 ft); long, bushy tail (~1 ft) • P 4/4 • Black fur, some white tips Martes americana (American marten) • P 4/4 • Smaller skull compared to fisher (largest marten skull still smaller than smallest fisher skull) – tympanic bulla • Long & shiny fur • Cream-colored patch on throat/chest • Cat-like ears, semi-retractable claws (long & sharp) Mustela vison (mink) • 34 teeth • Inflated tympanic bulla • Dumb bell-shaped 3rd upper molar • Flattened skull • No black tip on tail • Brown belly, white throat spots 4 Lontra canadensis (river otter) • Flat tympanic bulla • No triangular molars • Last upper molar = square • Globular braincase • Webbed feet Taxidea taxus (badger) • Wedge-shaped skull, widens to posterior • Inflated tympanic bulla • Triangular upper P4 and upper M1 Mustela frenata (long-tailed weasel) • Long rostrum • 34 teeth • Spear-shaped postorbital processes • Black tip on tail • White to yellow belly • Long tail (<6 in) Mustela erminea (short-tailed weasel) • Long rostrum • Spear-shaped postorbital processes • Black tip on tail • White to yellow belly • tail 2-4 in Mustela nivalis (least weasel) • Smallest weasel • No black tip on tail • White to yellow belly • Short (~1in) tail 5 Family Mephitidae – skunks (separated from Mustelidae based on genetics) Mephitis mephitis (striped skunk) • 34 teeth • Flat tympanic bulla • High arched skull Family Procyonidae – procyonids = cacomistle, coatis, raccoons Procyon lotor (raccoon) • 40 teeth (10 in a row) • Bunodont molars • Arched skull • Sagittal crest on older individuals Family Felidae – cats Lynx rufus (bobcat) • Short face • Long canines • Huge carnassials • Upper M1 = tiny • Spotted fur • Bobbed tail • P 2/2 6 Lynx canadensis (Canada lynx) • Short face • Long canines • Huge carnassials • Upper M1 = tiny • P 2/2 • Ear tuffs • Long limbs and large feet • Bobbed tail with black tip Comparing Lynx rufus (left) and Lynx canadensis (right) basilar parts of skull. Note the difference in the shapes of the presphenoid bones and the placement of the anterior condyloid foramina. 7 Puma concolor (cougar) • Uniform tawny fur • Long tail • Tiny upper M1 • Large skull • Short face • P 3/2 Comparing number of premolars between Felis (P 3/2)and Lynx (P 2/2). Note that bobcat is now Lynx rufus instead of Felis rufus 8 .
Recommended publications
  • Dental Anomalies in the Atlantic Population of South American Sea Lion, Otaria Byronia (Pinnipedia, Otariidae): Evolutionary Implications and Ecological Approach
    e-ISSN 2236-1057 - doi:10.5597/lajam00044 http://dx.doi.org/10.5597/lajam00044 LAJAM 3(1): 7-18, January/June 2004 ISSN 1676-7497 DENTAL ANOMALIES IN THE ATLANTIC POPULATION OF SOUTH AMERICAN SEA LION, OTARIA BYRONIA (PINNIPEDIA, OTARIIDAE): EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS AND ECOLOGICAL APPROACH César Jaeger Drehmer 1, 2 , Marta Elena Fabián 2, 3 and João Oldair Menegheti 3 Abstract – We analyzed 63 cases of dental anomalies from 62 specimens of a total sample of 516 specimens of the Atlantic population of South American sea lions, Otaria byronia de Blainville, 1820. The anomalies were represented by 53 cases of missing upper post-canine 6 (second molars), seven cases of maxillary or mandibular extra teeth, two cases of “dentes geminati” and one case of reduced teeth. Considering a phylogenetic framework where all otariid species and basal Pinnipedimorpha are included, missing post-canine 6 could be related to evolutionary trends in Otariidae towards a progressive reduction and loss of teeth (agenesis). The occurrence of the upper post-canine 6 in Otaria Péron, 1816 as in Phocarctos Peters, 1866 is usually regarded as a primitive character. Alternatively, when adopting another cladistic procedure, this could be interpreted as a taxic atavism at the base of Otaria/Phocarctos clade. Extra-mandibular teeth are related to a concrete case of spontaneous atavism in the dentition of Otaria byronia, in retrogression to ancient groups like the Miocene pinnipediform Pteronarctos Barnes, 1989. The other anomalies – maxillary extra teeth, “dentes geminati” and reduced teeth - are caused by some disturbance on the epigenetic system underlying dental morphogenesis leading to duplication, coalescence or duplication and reduction of the dental germ, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    UNDERSTANDING CARNIVORAN ECOMORPHOLOGY THROUGH DEEP TIME, WITH A CASE STUDY DURING THE CAT-GAP OF FLORIDA By SHARON ELIZABETH HOLTE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Sharon Elizabeth Holte To Dr. Larry, thank you ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my family for encouraging me to pursue my interests. They have always believed in me and never doubted that I would reach my goals. I am eternally grateful to my mentors, Dr. Jim Mead and the late Dr. Larry Agenbroad, who have shaped me as a paleontologist and have provided me to the strength and knowledge to continue to grow as a scientist. I would like to thank my colleagues from the Florida Museum of Natural History who provided insight and open discussion on my research. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Aldo Rincon for his help in researching procyonids. I am so grateful to Dr. Anne-Claire Fabre; without her understanding of R and knowledge of 3D morphometrics this project would have been an immense struggle. I would also to thank Rachel Short for the late-night work sessions and discussions. I am extremely grateful to my advisor Dr. David Steadman for his comments, feedback, and guidance through my time here at the University of Florida. I also thank my committee, Dr. Bruce MacFadden, Dr. Jon Bloch, Dr. Elizabeth Screaton, for their feedback and encouragement. I am grateful to the geosciences department at East Tennessee State University, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard for the loans of specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • HOME RANGES and DIVING BEHAVIOR of NEW ZEALAND SEA LIONS ALONG the CATLINS COAST, SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND a Dissertation by NA
    HOME RANGES AND DIVING BEHAVIOR OF NEW ZEALAND SEA LIONS ALONG THE CATLINS COAST, SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND A Dissertation by NATHAN MARK REED Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Randall Davis Committee Members, William Seitz Blair Sterba-Boatwright Bernd Würsig Intercollegiate Faculty Chair, Anja Schulze May 2021 Major Subject: Marine Biology Copyright 2021 Nathan Reed ABSTRACT New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri) were extirpated from the North and South Islands of New Zealand during pre-European native hunting, and their numbers were greatly reduced on the Auckland and Campbell Islands during European commercial sealing. However, they began reoccupying South Island in 1994, and pup production remains low but steady. The home range, at-sea movements, and diving behavior of females at the breeding colony along the Catlins Coast of South Island have not been studied since its inception in 2006. The goal of the study was to: 1) evaluate the performance of home range models to identify the most accurate model(s) for a semi- aquatic distribution, 2) track movements to identify home ranges, and 3) record diving behavior of females to characterize foraging behavior and estimate energy expenditure. To accomplish this study, we attached satellite telemeters and video and data recorders to females along the Catlins Coast during austral winter of 2019. Home ranges were most accurately modeled by separating inshore and offshore habitats and applying adaptive local convex hulls (LOCOH) and fixed kernel density with plug-in bandwidth selection (PKDE), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) Inferred
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. 1 Manuscript for review in PLOS One 2 3 Evolutionary history of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) inferred 4 from mitochondrial genomes 5 6 Alexandre Hassanin1*, Géraldine Véron1, Anne Ropiquet2, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren3, 7 Alexis Lécu4, Steven M. Goodman5, Jibran Haider1,6,7, Trung Thanh Nguyen1 8 9 1 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Université, 10 MNHN, CNRS, EPHE, UA, Paris. 11 12 2 Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, 13 United Kingdom. 14 15 3 Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, Department of Zoology, 16 University of Johannesburg, South Africa. 17 18 4 Parc zoologique de Paris, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. 19 20 5 Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA. 21 22 6 Department of Wildlife Management, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University 23 Rawalpindi, Pakistan. 24 25 7 Forest Parks & Wildlife Department Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. 26 27 28 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): Molecules, Morphology and the Great American Interchange
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43 (2007) 1076–1095 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of the Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): Molecules, morphology and the Great American Interchange a, b c a Klaus-Peter KoepXi ¤, Matthew E. Gompper , Eduardo Eizirik , Cheuk-Chung Ho , Leif Linden a, Jesus E. Maldonado d, Robert K. Wayne a a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA b Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri, Colombia, MO 65211, USA c Faculdade de Biociencias, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Predio 12, Porto Alegre, RS 90619-900, Brazil d Smithsonian Institution, NMNH/NZP—Genetic Program, 3001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA Received 10 June 2006; revised 22 September 2006; accepted 2 October 2006 Available online 11 October 2006 Abstract The Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carnivora) have played a central role in resolving the controversial systematics of the giant and red pandas, but phylogenetic relationships of species within the family itself have received much less attention. Cladistic analyses of morpho- logical characters conducted during the last two decades have resulted in topologies that group ecologically and morphologically similar taxa together. SpeciWcally, the highly arboreal and frugivorous kinkajou (Potos Xavus) and olingos (Bassaricyon) deWne one clade, whereas the more terrestrial and omnivorous coatis (Nasua), raccoons (Procyon), and ringtails (Bassariscus) deWne another clade, with the similar-sized Nasua and Procyon joined as sister taxa in this latter group. These relationships, however, have not been tested with molecu- lar sequence data. We examined procyonid phylogenetics based on combined data from nine nuclear and two mitochondrial gene seg- ments totaling 6534 bp.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins
    Vestnik zoologii, 50(4): 327–354, 2016 Evolution and Phylogeny DOI 10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040 UDC 569.5:575.86 RE-EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS QUESTIONS CURRENT VIEWS OF PINNIPED ORIGINS I. A. Koretsky¹, L. G. Barnes², S. J. Rahmat¹ ¹Laboratory of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Howard University, 520 W. St. NW, Washington, DC 20059 E-mail: [email protected] ²Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 Re-evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins. Koretsky, I. A., Barnes, L. G., Rahmat, S. J. — Th e origin of pinnipeds has been a contentious issue, with opposite sides debating monophyly or diphyly. Th is review uses evidence from the fossil record, combined with comparative morphology, molecular and cytogenetic investigations to evaluate the evolutionary history and phylogenetic relationships of living and fossil otarioid and phocoid pinnipeds. Molecular investigations support a monophyletic origin of pinnipeds, but disregard vital morphological data. Likewise, morphological studies support diphyly, but overlook molecular analyses. Th is review will demonstrate that a monophyletic origin of pinnipeds should not be completely accepted, as is the current ideology, and a diphyletic origin remains viable due to morphological and paleobiological analyses. Critical examination of certain characters, used by supporters of pinniped monophyly, reveals diff erent polarities, variability, or simply convergence. Th e paleontological record and our morphological analysis of important characters supports a diphyletic origin of pinnipeds, with otarioids likely arising in the North Pacifi c from large, bear-like animals and phocids arising in the North Atlantic from smaller, otter-like ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • An Arctomorph Carnivoran Skull from the Phosphorites Du Quercy and the Origin of Procyonids
    An arctomorph carnivoran skull from the Phosphorites du Quercy and the origin of procyonids MIECZYSEAW WOLSAN and BRIGI'ITE LANGE-BAD& Wolsan, M. & Lange-BadrC, B. 1996. An arctomorph carnivoran skull from the Phosphorites du Quercy and the origin of procyonids. Acta Palaeontologica Poloni- ca 41, 3, 277-298. The size and morphological characteristics of a skull of an arctomorph carnivoran mammal from Mouillac (old collection of the Phosphorites du Quercy, of unknown age) in France closely match those of the holotype of the earliest known procyonid Pseudobassaris riggsi and another skull referred to this species, both from old collections of the Phosphorites du Quercy (Caylus and Mouillac), probably earliest Late Oligocene in age. The skull is more primitive in morphology than those of ~seudobassarisrig&i and every other known procyonid, approaching a hypothetical primitive procyonid morphotype. The only, but methodologically fundamental, departure from this morphotype is the lack of the procyonid supra- meatal fossa, which is the crucial synapomorphy of the family Procyonidae. To explain the phylogenetic and taxonomic status of the arctomorph represented by the skull, three competing hypotheses are put forward. Hypothesis A, which considers the arctomorph as an individual of Pseudobassaris riggsi, assumes that the procyonid suprameatal fossa first appeared in a common ancestor of Pseudo- bassaris and other procyonids but was still of variable occurence within Pseudo- bassaris riggsi. Hypothesis B, which proposes the arctomorph as a member of a new Pseudobassaris species ancestral to Pseudobassaris riggsi, concludes that the procyonid suprameatal fossa arose in Pseudobassaris riggsi and in the Procyonidae independently, excluding Pseudobassaris from the procyonids.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Finarelli and Flynn 10.1073/pnas.0901780106 SI Text comparisons to extant taxa appreciably lower the power of Phylogeny of the Carnivora. Valid statistical analysis of compara- statistical analyses. tive data in biological systems always requires information on the The still imprecise understanding of the evolutionary rela- phylogenetic relationships of the organisms being analyzed to tionships among fossil and extant musteloid taxa (7–11) presents account for the statistical nonindependence of observed char- further challenges in reconstructing character transformations acter values for closely related taxa (1, 2). We constructed a across this clade. We partitioned both nonfelid feliforms and composite cladogram of the Carnivora based on frameworks musteloids into ‘‘archaic’’ and ‘‘modern’’ groups based on first provided by several recent molecular phylogenies of the Car- appearances of taxa in the fossil record. It should be noted that nivora and further augmented by clade-specific phylogenies both of these cutoffs are necessarily arbitrary, and the groupings derived from DNA and morphological data. Recent phyloge- they produce are both highly paraphyletic. Therefore, in contrast netic analyses of the Carnivora using DNA sequence data have to the preceding use of paraphyletic groups, for which observed greatly improved our understanding of the interrelationships change in the allometries can be mapped to a single branch of the among the traditional family-level clades within this clade. In phylogeny, changes between archaic and modern feliforms or addition, morphological and ‘‘total evidence’’ phylogenies, in- musteloids only represent differences between early and late cluding fossil taxa, provide the means to incorporate extinct appearing members of each group.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall of North American Mammals Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide THE JILL AND LEWIS BERNARD FAMILY HALL OF NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS Featuring Carnivorans INSIDE: • Suggestions to Help You Come Prepared • Essential Questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for Teaching in the Exhibition • Map of the Exhibition • Online Resources for the Classroom • Correlation to Standards • Glossary amnh.org/namammals Essential QUESTIONS More than 25 Museum expeditions across this continent produced the specimens displayed in this hall’s magnificent dioramas. Many belong to the order of mammals called Carnivora (carnivorans), one of the most diverse orders within the mammal group. Use the Essential Questions below to connect the dioramas to your curriculum. What is a mammal? How have traits of the Carnivora helped You might have grown up thinking that all mammals share the order survive and diversify? certain traits, like fur and giving birth to live young, and As environments change over time, living things must most living mammals do. But what defines this diverse respond by migrating, adapting, or sometimes going group of animals is that they all are descended from a com- extinct. Different traits are favored in different habitats mon ancestor shared with no other living animals. Because and are passed on to future generations. For example, of this common ancestor (and unlike other vertebrates), carnivorans take care of their young until they are old all mammals have three middle ear bones. The group is enough to hunt, which helps them live to adulthood. divided into over 20 orders, which include Primates (e.g. Also, the diversity of their teeth has helped carnivorans humans), Rodentia (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography and Conservation of the Pinnipeds (Carnivora: Mammalia)
    Biogeography and conservation of the pinnipeds (Carnivora: Mammalia) by Jeffrey W. Higdon A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) Department of Environment and Geography University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2011 by Jeffrey W. Higdon Abstract This thesis examines the biogeography of world pinnipeds, a unique group of marine mammals that have adapted to marine foraging while maintaining terrestrial (land or ice) habitat links. Comparative analyses of species range sizes controlled for phylogenetic relationships using a multi-gene supertree with divergence dates estimated using fossil calibrations. Adaptations to aquatic mating and especially sea ice parturition have influenced range size distribution, and ranges are larger than those of terrestrially mating and/or pupping species. Small range size is endangering for many taxa, and at risk pinnipeds are mainly terrestrial species with small ranges. Ancestral state reconstructions suggest that pinnipeds had a long association with sea ice, an adaptation that would have allowed early seals to expand into novel habitats and increase their distribution. Range sizes exhibit a strong Rapoport effect (positive relationship between range size and latitude) at the global scale, even after controlling for phylogeny and body size allometry. A latitudinal gradient in species diversity cannot explain the Rapoport effect for global pinniped ranges, as diversity is highest at mid-latitudes in both hemispheres. These regions are characterized by marginal ice zones and variable climates, supporting a mix of pagophilic and temperate species. The climatic variability hypothesis also did not explain the Rapoport effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Evolution in the Arctoidea YA-PING ZHANG and OLIVER A
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 9557-9561, October 1993 Evolution Mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Arctoidea YA-PING ZHANG AND OLIVER A. RYDER* Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, P.O. Box 551, San Diego, CA 92112 Communicated by Charles G. Sibley, July 22, 1993 ABSTRACT Some taxa in the superfamily Arctoidea, such (a total of 835 bp) and examined the relationship among all as the giant panda and the lesser panda, have presented puzzles species ofthe Ursidae, the giant panda, the lesser panda, and to taxonomists. In the present study, -397 bases of the three representatives of procyonids (coatimundi, kinkajou, cytochrome b gene, 364 bases of the 12S rRNA gene, and 74 and raccoon).t bases of the tRNAThr and tRNAF'rO genes from the giant panda, lesser panda, kinkajou, raccoon, coatimundi, and all species of the Ursidae were sequenced. The high transition/transversion MATERIAL AND METHODS ratios in cytochrome b and RNA genes prior to saturation Samples. The giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) and suggest that the presumed transition bias may represent a trend American black bear (Euarctos americanus) samples were for some mammalian lineages rather than strictly a primate provided by R. Montali (National Zoological Park, Washing- phenomenon. Transversions in the 12S rRNA gene accumulate ton, DC) and F. Allendorf(University ofMontana, Missoula, in arctoids at about half the rate reported for artiodactyls. MT), respectively. The lesser panda (Ailurusfulgens), kinka- Different arctoid lineages evolve at different rates: the kinka- jou (Potosflavus), coatimundi (Nasua narica), raccoon (Pro- jou, a procyonid, evolves the fastest, 1.7-1.9 times faster than cyon lotor), spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus), Asiatic the slowest lineage that comprises the spectacled and polar black bear (Selenarctos thibetanus), brown bear (Ursus bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Light and Scanning Electron Microscopic Study on the Tongue and Lingual Papillae of the Common Raccoon, Procyon Lotor
    OkajimasLingual Folia PapillaeAnat. Jpn., of the87 (2):Common 65–73, raccoon August, 201065 Light and Scanning Electron Microscopic Study on the Tongue and Lingual Papillae of the Common raccoon, Procyon lotor By Yoshiko MIYAWAKI1, Ken YOSHIMURA1, Junji SHINDO2, and Ikuo KAGEYAMA1 1 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Life Dentistry, The Nippon Dental University at Niigata, Niigata, Japan 2 Laboratory of Wildlife Science, Dept. of Environmental Bioscience, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Towada, Japan –Received for Publication, June 4, 2010– Key Words: Common raccoon, carnivore, lingual papillae, comparative anatomy, scanning electron microscopy Summary: We observed the external surface and connective tissue cores (CTCs), after exfoliation of the epithelium of the lingual papillae (filiform, fungiform, foliate and vallate papillae) of the common raccoon (Procyon lotor) using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. The tongue was elongated and their two-third width was almost fixed. Numer- ous filiform papillae were distributed along the anterior two-thirds of the tongue and fungiform papillae were distributed between the filiform papillae. Eight vallate papillae that had a weak circumferential ridge were distributed in a V-shape in the posterior part of the tongue and numerous taste buds were observable in the circumferential furrows of vallate papil- lae. Weak fold-like foliate papillae were observable at the lateral edge in the posterior part of the tongue and a few salivary duct orifices were observable beneath the foliate papillae. An islet-like structure with numerous taste buds, was observable on the deep part of the salivary duct of foliate papillae. Large conical papillae were distributed at the posterior part and root of the tongue.
    [Show full text]