DOCSLIB.ORG

DAACS Cataloging Manual: Ceramics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DAACS Cataloging Manual: Ceramics DAACS Cataloging Manual: Ceramics OCTOBER 2018 DAACS Cataloging Manuals document how artifacts, contexts, features, objects and images are cataloged into the DAACS database. They provide information not only about artifact identification but also about how each database field is used and how data should be entered into that field. The DAACS database was developed by Jillian Galle and Fraser Neiman, in collaboration with members of the DAACS Steering Committee . Jillian Galle and DAACS Staff, Leslie Cooper, Lynsey Bates, Lindsay Bloch, Elizabeth Bollwerk, Jesse Sawyer, and Beatrix Arendt, led the development of cataloging protocols. In addition to DAACS staff and steering committee members, Monticello current and former Archaeology Department staff, Fraser Neiman, Jennifer Aultman, Sara Bon-Harper, Derek Wheeler, Donald Gaylord, Karen Smith, and Nick Bon-Harper also contributed to the development of cataloging protocols. Jennifer Aultman and Kate Grillo produced the initial versions of these DAACS manuals in 2003. They have been substantially revised by Cooper, Galle, and Bloch in the intervening years. This manual was last updated: October 10, 2018 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 9 1. CERAMIC ARTIFACT ENTRY ........................................................... 10 1.1 COUNT ............................................................................................................. 10 1.2 WARE .............................................................................................................. 11 1.3 MATERIAL ......................................................................................................... 12 1.4 MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUE .............................................................................. 13 1.5 VESSEL CATEGORY .............................................................................................. 14 1.6 FORM .............................................................................................................. 14 1.6.1 Teaware .................................................................................................. 14 1.6.2 Tableware ............................................................................................... 15 1.6.3 Utilitarian ................................................................................................ 15 1.6.4 Other Forms ............................................................................................ 16 1.6.5 Gastroliths ............................................................................................... 16 1.6.5 Gaming pieces ......................................................................................... 16 1.7 COMPLETENESS .................................................................................................. 17 1.8 DECORATION? ................................................................................................... 17 1.9 MENDED? ........................................................................................................ 17 1.10 EXTERIOR SURFACE ........................................................................................... 17 1.11 EXTERIOR COLOR .............................................................................................. 17 1.12 EXTERIOR GLAZE OPACITY .................................................................................. 19 1.13 INTERIOR SURFACE............................................................................................ 19 1.14 INTERIOR COLOR .............................................................................................. 19 1.15 INTERIOR GLAZE OPACITY ................................................................................... 19 1.16 CERAMIC TABLE SPECIAL CASE: DETACHED AND MISSING GLAZE ................................... 20 1.16.1 Detached Glaze ..................................................................................... 20 1.16.2 Missing Glaze ........................................................................................ 20 2. MEASUREMENTS ............................................................................ 20 2.1 SHERD THICKNESS ............................................................................................... 20 2.2 MAXIMUM SHERD MEASUREMENT ........................................................................ 21 2.3 SHERD WEIGHT .................................................................................................. 21 3 2.4 MENDED SHERD WEIGHT ..................................................................................... 21 2.5 RIM LENGTH ..................................................................................................... 21 2.6 RIM DIAMETER .................................................................................................. 21 2.7 MENDED RIM DIAMETER ..................................................................................... 21 2.8 BASE LENGTH .................................................................................................... 21 2.9 BASE DIAMETER ................................................................................................. 21 2.10 MENDED BASE DIAMETER .................................................................................. 22 3. DECORATION ................................................................................... 22 3.1 GENERAL ......................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1 Genre ...................................................................................................... 22 3.1.2 Pattern Name .......................................................................................... 22 3.1.3 Pattern Notes .......................................................................................... 22 3.2 DECORATIVE ATTRIBUTES ..................................................................................... 22 3.2.1 Interior/exterior ...................................................................................... 22 3.2.2 Location .................................................................................................. 23 3.2.3 Decorative Technique ............................................................................. 23 3.2.4 Decoration Color ..................................................................................... 23 3.2.5 Stylistic Element...................................................................................... 24 3.2.6 Motif ....................................................................................................... 25 3.2.7 Recording Transfer-Printed Decoration ................................................. 28 4. WEAR/CONDITION ......................................................................... 29 4.1 EVIDENCE OF BURNING ....................................................................................... 29 4.2 POST-MANUFACTURING MODIFICATION ................................................................. 29 4.3 WEAR LOCATION ............................................................................................... 29 4.4 CERAMIC COMPLETENESS .................................................................................... 29 4.5 WEAR PATTERN ................................................................................................ 29 5. BASE MARK ..................................................................................... 30 5.1 BASE MARK ...................................................................................................... 30 5.2 BASE MARK COLOR ............................................................................................ 30 4 5.3 BASE MARK REFERENCE ...................................................................................... 30 6. COARSE EARTHENWARE PROTOCOLS ........................................ 31 6.1 NON-BATCHED “AMBIGUOUS IMPORTED” AND “LOCALLY-MADE” COARSE EARTHENWARES . 31 6.1.1 Earthenware Type .................................................................................. 31 6.1.2 Paste Color ............................................................................................. 32 6.1.3 Oxidized vs. Reduced Fabric ................................................................... 32 6.1.4 Total Paste Inclusion Density .................................................................. 32 6.1.5 Coarse earthenware Inclusions ............................................................... 32 6.2 “LOCALLY-MADE” COARSE EARTHENWARE .............................................................. 35 6.2.1 Locally-made and ambiguous imported Coarse Earthenware Batching protocols .......................................................................................................... 36 6.2.2 Non-batched locally-made coarse earthenware protocols ................... 37 6.2.3 Earthenware Type ................................................................................... 39 6.2.4 Decoration Mode ................................................................................... 39 Vessel Shape Descriptor Fields ......................................................................... 39 6.2.5 Vessel Shape .......................................................................................... 39 6.2.6 Orifice Type ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Potterõ S Pots, by Suze Lindsay Clay Culture
    Cover: Bryan Hopkins functional constructions Spotlight: A Potter s Pots, by Suze Lindsay Clay Culture: An Exploration of Jun ceramics Process: Lauren Karle s folded patterns em— robl ever! p a Mark Issenberg, Lookout M ” ountain d 4. Pottery, 7 Risin a 9 g Faw h 1 n, GA r in e it v t e h n g s u a o h b t I n e r b y M “ y t n a r r a w r a e y 10 (800) 374-1600 • www.brentwheels.com a ith el w The only whe www.ceramicsmonthly.org october 2012 1 “I have a Shimpo wheel from the 1970’s, still works well, durability is important for potters” David Stuempfle www.stuempflepottery.com 2 october 2012 www.ceramicsmonthly.org www.ceramicsmonthly.org october 2012 3 MONTHLY ceramic arts bookstore Editorial [email protected] telephone: (614) 794-5867 fax: (614) 891-8960 editor Sherman Hall associate editor Holly Goring associate editor Jessica Knapp editorial assistant Erin Pfeifer technical editor Dave Finkelnburg online editor Jennifer Poellot Harnetty Advertising/Classifieds [email protected] telephone: (614) 794-5834 fax: (614) 891-8960 classifi[email protected] telephone: (614) 794-5843 advertising manager Mona Thiel advertising services Jan Moloney Marketing telephone: (614) 794-5809 marketing manager Steve Hecker Subscriptions/Circulation customer service: (800) 342-3594 [email protected] Design/Production production editor Melissa Bury production assistant Kevin Davison design Boismier John Design Editorial and advertising offices 600 Cleveland Ave., Suite 210 Westerville, Ohio 43082 Publisher Charles Spahr Editorial Advisory Board Linda Arbuckle; Professor, Ceramics, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Pottery from Romsey: an Overview
    Proc. Hampshire Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 67 (pt. II), 2012, 323–346 (Hampshire Studies 2012) MEDIEVAL POTTERY FROM ROMSEY: AN OVERVIEW By BEN JERVIS ABSTRACT is evidence of both prehistoric and Roman occupation, but this paper will deal only with This paper summarises the medieval pottery recovered the medieval archaeology, from the mid-Saxon from excavations undertaken by Test Valley Archae- period to the 16th century. ological Trust in Romsey, Hampshire from the Several excavations took place between the 1970’s–1990’s. A brief synthesis of the archaeology of 1970’s–90’s in the precinct of Romsey Abbey Romsey is presented followed by a dated catalogue of (see Scott 1996). It has been suggested on the pottery types identified, including discussions of the basis of historical evidence and a series fabric, form and wider affinities. The paper concludes of excavated, early, graves that the late Saxon with discussions of the supply of pottery to Romsey in abbey was built on the site of an existing eccle- the medieval period and also considers ceramic use siastical establishment, possibly a minster in the town. church (Collier 1990, 45; Scott 1996, 7). The foundation of the nunnery itself can be dated to the 10th century (Scott 1996, 158), but it INTRODUCTION was evacuated in AD 1001, due to the threat of Danish attack, being re-founded later in The small town of Romsey has been the focus the 11th century. The abbey expanded during of much archaeological excavation over the last the Norman period, with the building of the 30–40 years, but very little has been published choir and nave (Scott 1996, 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Fossils Carbon-Film Transfer on Saggar-Fired Porcelain by Dick Lehman
    March 2000 1 2 CERAMICS MONTHLY March 2000 Volume 48 Number 3 “Leaves in Love,” 10 inches in height, handbuilt stoneware with abraded glaze, by Michael Sherrill, Hendersonville, North FEATURES Carolina. 34 Fast Fossils 40 Carbon-Film Transfer on Saggar-Fired Porcelain by Dick Lehman 38 Steven Montgomery The wood-firing kiln at Buck Industrial imagery with rich texture and surface detail Pottery, Gruene, Texas. 40 Michael Sherrill 62 Highly refined organic forms in porcelain 42 Rasa and Juozas Saldaitis by Charles Shilas Lithuanian couple emigrate for arts opportunities 45 The Poetry of Punchong Slip-Decorated Ware by Byoung-Ho Yoo, Soo-Jong Ree and Sung-Jae Choi by Meghen Jones 49 No More Gersdey Borateby JejfZamek Why, how and what to do about it 51 Energy and Care Pit Firing Burnished Pots on the Beach by Carol Molly Prier 55 NitsaYaffe Israeli artist explores minimalist abstraction in vessel forms “Teapot,” approximately 9 inches in height, white 56 A Female Perspectiveby Alan Naslund earthenware with under­ Female form portrayed by Amy Kephart glazes and glazes, by Juozas and Rasa Saldaitis, 58 Endurance of Spirit St. Petersburg, Florida. The Work of Joanne Hayakawa by Mark Messenger 62 Buck Pottery 42 17 Years of Turnin’ and Burnin’ by David Hendley 67 Redware: Tradition and Beyond Contemporary and historical work at the Clay Studio “Bottle,” 7 inches in height, wheel-thrown porcelain, saggar 68 California Contemporary Clay fired with ferns and sumac, by The cover:“Echolalia,” San Francisco invitational exhibition Dick Lehman, Goshen, Indiana. 29½ inches in height, press molded and assembled, 115 Conquering Higher Ground 34 by Steven Montgomery, NCECA 2000 Conference Preview New York City; see page 38.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE SCHOOL OF VISUAL ARTS FOR THE LOVE OF PIE LINDA M. N. STRUBLE Spring 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Art with honors in Art Reviewed and approved* by the following: Del Harrow Assistant Professor of Art Thesis Supervisor Jerrold Maddox Professor of Art Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT For my senior research project I hosted the event For the Love of Pie in the Patterson Gallery of the Pennsylvania State University. I combined pottery, painting, and pastry to create pieces that encouraged attendees to interact with the objects in the gallery and to interact with each other. These interactions or relations became the ultimate component of my work. I wanted to elevate pie. So, I experimented with earthenware to develop different surface textures that created an aesthetic bridge between the ceramics and the pastries. In addition to pie, I incorporated elaborate desserts--croquembouche and kransekake. My work is ornate in the sense that it is composed of layers of complexity that engage multiple senses. I have a long history with pies and pastries, but I needed to look elsewhere for inspiration for the other elements of my work. Giorgio Morandi, Betty Woodman, and Luca Della Robbia provided plenty and I created works after each of these artists. Nicolas Bourriaud and Rirkrit Tiravanija introduced me to the concept of relational aesthetics while Gordon Matta-Clark’s ventures in aspic bolstered my reserve and helped me to articulate my goals.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Ceramic Arts
    Profile No.: 38 NIC Code: 23933 CEREMIC ARTS 1. INTRODUCTION: Ceramic art is art made from ceramic materials, including clay. It may take forms including art ware, tile, figurines, sculpture, and tableware. Ceramic art is one of the arts, particularly the visual arts. Of these, it is one of the plastic arts. While some ceramics are considered fine art, some are considered to be decorative, industrial or applied art objects. Ceramics may also be considered artifacts in archaeology. Ceramic art can be made by one person or by a group of people. In a pottery or ceramic factory, a group of people design, manufacture and decorate the art ware. Products from a pottery are sometimes referred to as "art pottery".[1] In a one-person pottery studio, ceramists or potters produce studio pottery. Most traditional ceramic products were made from clay (or clay mixed with other materials), shaped and subjected to heat, and tableware and decorative ceramics are generally still made this way. In modern ceramic engineering usage, ceramics is the art and science of making objects from inorganic, non-metallic materials by the action of heat. It excludes glass and mosaic made from glass tesserae. There is a long history of ceramic art in almost all developed cultures, and often ceramic objects are all the artistic evidence left from vanished cultures. Elements of ceramic art, upon which different degrees of emphasis have been placed at different times, are the shape of the object, its decoration by painting, carving and other methods, and the glazing found on most ceramics. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia
    2007–2010 Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia Contributing Authors: David Givens, William M. Kelso, Jamie May, Mary Anna Richardson, Daniel Schmidt, & Beverly Straube William M. Kelso Beverly Straube Daniel Schmidt Editors March 2012 Structure 177 (Well) Structure 176 Structure 189 Soldier’s Pits Structure 175 Structure 183 Structure 172 Structure 187 1607 Burial Ground Structure 180 West Bulwark Ditch Solitary Burials Marketplace Structure 185 Churchyard (Cellar/Well) Excavations Prehistoric Test Ditches 28 & 29 Structure 179 Fence 2&3 (Storehouse) Ludwell Burial Structure 184 Pit 25 Slot Trenches Outlines of James Fort South Church Excavations Structure 165 Structure 160 East Bulwark Ditch 2 2 Graphics and maps by David Givens and Jamie May Design and production by David Givens Photography by Michael Lavin and Mary Anna Richardson ©2012 by Preservation Virginia and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. All rights reserved, including the right to produce this report or portions thereof in any form. 2 2 Acknowledgements (2007–2010) The Jamestown Rediscovery team, directed by Dr. William this period, namely Juliana Harding, Christian Hager, and Kelso, continued archaeological excavations at the James Matthew Balazik. Thank you to the Colonial Williamsburg Fort site from 2007–2010. The following list highlights Foundation architectural historians who have analyzed the some of the many individuals who contributed to the project fort buildings with us: Cary Carson, Willie Graham, Carl during these
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Year in Review
    Table of Contents 3 Director’s Welcome 7 Objects in Space: A Conversation with Barry Bergdoll and Charlotte Vignon 17 Glorious Excess: Dr. Susan Weber on Victorian Majolica 23 Object Lessons: Inside the Lab for Teen Thinkers 33 Teaching 43 Faculty Year in Review 50 Internships, Admissions, and Student Travel and Research 55 Research and Exhibitions 69 Gallery 82 Publications 83 Digital Media Lab 85 Library 87 Public Programs 97 Fundraising and Special Events Eileen Gray. Transat chair owned by the Maharaja of Indore, from the Manik Bagh Palace, 1930. Lacquered wood, nickel-plated brass, leather, canvas. Private collection. Copyright 2014 Phillips Auctioneers LLC. All Rights Reserved. Director’s Welcome For me, Bard Graduate Center’s Quarter-Century Celebration this year was, at its heart, a tribute to our alumni. From our first, astonishing incoming class to our most recent one (which, in a first for BGC, I met over Zoom), our students are what I am most proud of. That first class put their trust in a fledgling institution that burst upon the academic art world to rectify an as-yet-undiagnosed need for a place to train the next generation of professional students of objects. Those beginning their journey this fall now put their trust in an established leader who they expect will prepare them to join a vital field of study, whether in the university, museum, or market. What a difference a generation makes! I am also intensely proud of how seriously BGC takes its obligation to develop next-generation scholarship in decorative arts, design his- tory, and material culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Pêcheurs, Pâturages, Et Petit Jardins: a Nineteenth-Century Gardien Homestead in the Petit Nord, Newfoundland
    NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI* Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57435-5 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57435-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Culture from the Wilson Farm Tenancy: Artifact Analysis
    AT THE ROAD’S EDGE: FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE WILSON FARM TENANCY SITE 7 Material Culture from the Wilson Farm Tenancy: Artifact Analysis LABORATORY AND ANALYTICAL METHODS The URS laboratory in Burlington, New Jersey, processed the artifacts recovered from Site 7NC- F-94. All artifacts were initially cleaned, labeled, and bagged (throughout, technicians maintained the excavation provenience integrity of each artifact). Stable artifacts were washed in water with Orvis soap using a soft bristle brush, then air-dried; in some cases, on an individual basis, artifacts deemed too delicate to wash were dry brushed—this is often the case with badly deteriorated iron and bone objects considered noteworthy. Technicians then labeled items such as prehistoric lithics, historic ceramics, bone, glass, and some metal artifacts. Labeling was conducted using an acid free, conservation grade, .25mm Staedtler marking pen applied over a base coat of Acyloid B72 resin; once the ink dried, the label was sealed with a second layer of Acyloid B72. The information marked on the artifacts consisted of the provenience catalog number. Once the artifacts were processed, they were then inventoried in a Microsoft Access database. The artifacts were sorted according to functional groups and material composition in this inventory. Separate analyses were conducted on the artifacts and inventory data to answer site spatial and temporal questions. Outside consultants analyzed the floral and faunal materials. URS conducted soil flotation. In order to examine the spatial distributions of artifacts in the plowzone, we entered the data for certain artifact types into the Surfer 8.06.39 contouring and surface-mapping program.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramics Monthly Jun90 Cei069
    William C. Hunt........................................Editor Ruth C. Buder.......................... Associate Editor Robert L. Creager........................... Art Director Kim Schomburg....................Editorial Assistant Mary Rushley................... Circulation Manager Mary E. Beaver.................Circulation Assistant Jayne Lx>hr.......................Circulation Assistant Connie Belcher.................Advertising Manager Spencer L. Davis.................................Publisher Editorial, Advertising and Circulation Offices 1609 Northwest Boulevard Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio43212 (614) 488-8236 FAX (614) 488-4561 Ceramics Monthly (ISSN 0009-0328) is pub­ lished monthly except July and August by Professional Publications, Inc., 1609 North­ west Blvd., Columbus, Ohio 43212. Second Class postage paid at Columbus, Ohio. Subscription Rates: One year $20, two years $36, three years $50. Add $8 per year for subscriptions outside the U.S.A. Change of Address: Please give us four weeks advance notice. Send both the magazine address label and your new ad­ dress to: Ceramics Monthly, Circulation Of­ fices, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. Contributors: Manuscripts, photographs, color separations, color transparencies (including 35mm slides), graphic illustra­ tions, announcements and news releases about ceramics are welcome and will be considered for publication. A booklet de­ scribing standards and procedures for the preparation and submission of a manu­ script is available upon request. Mail sub­ missions to: The Editor, Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. Infor­ mation may also be sent by fax: (614) 488- 4561; or submitted on 3.5-inch microdisk- ettes readable with an Apple Macintosh™ computer system. Indexing: An index of each year’s articles appears in the December issue. Addition­ ally, articles in each issue ofCeramics Monthly are indexed in the Art Index; on-line (com­ puter) indexing is available through Wilson- line, 950 University Avenue, Bronx, New York 10452.
    [Show full text]
  • Decorative Arts & Contemporary Ceramics
    Decorative Arts & Contemporary Ceramics Contemporary Arts & Decorative I Montpelier Street, London I 13 November 2019 I Montpelier Street, 25323 Decorative Arts & Contemporary Ceramics Montpelier Street, London I 13 November 2019 Decorative Arts and Contemporary Ceramics Montpelier Street, London | Wednesday 13 November 2019, at 1pm BONHAMS BIDS ENQUIRIES FURNITURE & FURNISHINGS Montpelier Street +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 Mark Oliver Whilst we take every care in Knightsbridge +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax Tel:+44 (0) 20 7393 3856 cataloguing furniture which has London SW7 1HH [email protected] [email protected] been upholstered we offer no bonhams.com guarantee as to the originality of Please note that bids should Duane Kahlhamer the wood covered by fabric or VIEWING be submitted no later than 24 Tel: +44 (0) 20 7393 3860 upholstery. hours before the sale. New [email protected] Sunday 10 November bidders must also provide proof All furniture and furnishings 11am – 3pm of identity when submitting bids. Emily Mayson produced after 1 January 1950, Monday 11 November Failure to do this may result in Tel: +44 (0) 20 7393 3997 comprising an element of soft 9am – 4.30pm your bids not being processed. [email protected] furnishing, is strictly regulated Tuesday 12 November by statute law in the interests of 9am – 4.30pm Live online bidding is [email protected] safety. Such items in the sale Wednesday 13 November available for this sale were not originally supplied for 9am – 11am Please email [email protected] PRESS ENQUIRIES use in a private home or now with “Live bidding” in the subject offered solely as works of art.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonsuch Palace
    MARTIN BIDDLE who excavated Nonsuch ONSUCH, ‘this which no equal has and its Banqueting House while still an N in Art or Fame’, was built by Henry undergraduate at Pembroke College, * Palace Nonsuch * VIII to celebrate the birth in 1537 of Cambridge, is now Emeritus Professor of Prince Edward, the longed-for heir to the Medieval Archaeology at Oxford and an English throne. Nine hundred feet of the Emeritus Fellow of Hertford College. His external walls of the palace were excavations and other investigations, all NONSUCH PALACE decorated in stucco with scenes from with his wife, the Danish archaeologist classical mythology and history, the Birthe Kjølbye-Biddle, include Winchester Gods and Goddesses, the Labours of (1961–71), the Anglo-Saxon church and Hercules, the Arts and Virtues, the Viking winter camp at Repton in The Material Culture heads of many of the Roman emperors, Derbyshire (1974–93), St Albans Abbey and Henry VIII himself looking on with and Cathedral Church (1978, 1982–4, the young Edward by his side. The 1991, 1994–5), the Tomb of Christ in of a Noble Restoration Household largest scheme of political propaganda the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (since ever created for the English crown, the 1989), and the Church on the Point at stuccoes were a mirror to show Edward Qasr Ibrim in Nubia (1989 and later). He the virtues and duties of a prince. is a Fellow of the British Academy. Edward visited Nonsuch only once as king and Mary sold it to the Earl of Martin Biddle Arundel. Nonsuch returned to the crown in 1592 and remained a royal house until 1670 when Charles II gave the palace and its park to his former mistress, Barbara Palmer, Duchess of Cleveland.
    [Show full text]