Nonsuch Palace

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nonsuch Palace MARTIN BIDDLE who excavated Nonsuch ONSUCH, ‘this which no equal has and its Banqueting House while still an N in Art or Fame’, was built by Henry undergraduate at Pembroke College, * Palace Nonsuch * VIII to celebrate the birth in 1537 of Cambridge, is now Emeritus Professor of Prince Edward, the longed-for heir to the Medieval Archaeology at Oxford and an English throne. Nine hundred feet of the Emeritus Fellow of Hertford College. His external walls of the palace were excavations and other investigations, all NONSUCH PALACE decorated in stucco with scenes from with his wife, the Danish archaeologist classical mythology and history, the Birthe Kjølbye-Biddle, include Winchester Gods and Goddesses, the Labours of (1961–71), the Anglo-Saxon church and Hercules, the Arts and Virtues, the Viking winter camp at Repton in The Material Culture heads of many of the Roman emperors, Derbyshire (1974–93), St Albans Abbey and Henry VIII himself looking on with and Cathedral Church (1978, 1982–4, the young Edward by his side. The 1991, 1994–5), the Tomb of Christ in of a Noble Restoration Household largest scheme of political propaganda the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (since ever created for the English crown, the 1989), and the Church on the Point at stuccoes were a mirror to show Edward Qasr Ibrim in Nubia (1989 and later). He the virtues and duties of a prince. is a Fellow of the British Academy. Edward visited Nonsuch only once as king and Mary sold it to the Earl of Martin Biddle Arundel. Nonsuch returned to the crown in 1592 and remained a royal house until 1670 when Charles II gave the palace and its park to his former mistress, Barbara Palmer, Duchess of Cleveland. The keeper of Nonsuch at this time was George Lord Berkeley who with his family continued to live there on and off until the final demolition began in 1688. When the palace was excavated by Martin Biddle in 1959, many of the garderobe pits were found to be full of debris from the last years of the Berkeley occupation in the 1680s: glass vessels and tin-glazed ‘delft’ pottery, both of exceptional quality, stoneware, earthenware, glass ‘sack’ bottles, pewter, ironwork, and huge quantities of bird, fish, and mammal bones. Perhaps Martin Biddle the richest collection of domestic materials of the later seventeenth century ever recovered by archaeology from a single site — with ‘heirloom’ pieces dating back a century or more — these materials are illustrated and discussed in this volume by leading scholars, three of them former or present curators at the Victoria and Albert Museum. A window into the domestic life and material culture of a noble Restoration household, this book is a landmark in the development of Early Modern Archaeology and an essential work of reference for students and collectors of the material culture of seventeenth-century England. A volume on the art and architecture Nonsuch Palace from the north-east, of Henry VIII’s palace is in preparation. probably by Hendrick Danckerts c. 1666–79. Copyright Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee. All Oxbow Books rights reserved Oxbow Books Nonsuch Palace from the north-east, probably by Hendrick Danckerts c. 1666–79. Copyright Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee. All rights reserved Nonsuch Palace from the north-east, probably by Hendrick Danckerts c. 1666–79. Copyright Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee. All rights reserved Nonsuch Palace Martin Biddle * * The Material Culture of a Noble Restoration Household Frontispiece. Fine vessel glass: Venetian goblet 1: p.238, Fig. 110 (1:1). Painted reconstruction by Jenny Stringer Nonsuch Palace Martin Biddle * * The Material Culture of a Noble Restoration Household With contributions by Michael Archer, D. R. Atkinson, C. Bradbury, R. Brownsword, June Chatfield, the late R. J. Charleston, Geoff Egan, Blanche Ellis, Alison R. Goodall, Ian H. Goodall, P. M. Gouk, Robin Hildyard, Alison Locker, Arthur MacGregor, F. R. Maddison, Catherine Mortimer, Hugh Pagan, the late J. H. Thornton, Jane Webster and Rosemary Weinstein Oxbow Books Published by Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK © Martin Biddle, 2005 ISBN 978-1-90018-834-0 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library This book is published with the aid of a grant from English Heritage. English Heritage is now Historic England This book is available to download from http://books.casematepublishing.com/Nonsuch_Palace.pdf For IVOR NOËL HUME a founding father of Early Modern Archaeology on two continents THE NONSUCH PALACE EXCAVATION COMMITTEE † Sir John Summerson CBE, FBA (Chairman, 1959–1992) Professor Martin Biddle FBA (Secretary and Director, 1959–) † John Dent FLA (Treasurer, 1959–1972) † Miss J M I Griffiths FLA (Treasurer, 1974–1989) R.P. Brownjohn (1959–) (latterly Borough Engineer, Epsom and Ewell) Miss S.E. Butcher (1974–1980) (Ancient Monuments Inspectorate) † C.G. Cobbett (1959–1986) (Borough Engineer and Surveyor, Epsom and Ewell, Surveyor to the Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee) Sir Howard Colvin CBE FBA (1959–) (Editor, The History of the Kings Works) Graham Hunter (1969–1974) (Curator, Bourne Hall Museum, Epsom and Ewell) † John Hurst FBA (1959–2003) (Ancient Monuments Inspectorate) P.H. Moore (1974–1985) Borough Engineer and Surveyor, Epsom and Ewell, Surveyor to the Nonsuch Park Joint Management Committee) † Philip Shearman FSA (1959–1989) (Surrey Archaeological Society and the Nonsuch Society) Arnold Taylor CBE, FBA (1959–1974) (Ancient Monuments Inspectorate) STAFF AND VOLUNTEERS OF THE NONSUCH PROJECT Assistant director (in charge of finds) Alan Millard (1959) Site supervisors Surveyors Peter Addyman (1959) Anthony Baggs (1959) Lawrence Barfield (1959–60) Martin Biddle (1960) Joan Collins (1960) R.P. Brownjohn (1959) Richard Fries (1959–60) John Haslam (1959) Colvin Greig (1959) Ann Hamlin (1959–60) Draughtsmen † Frances James (1959) Terry Ball (1959) Martin Morris (1960–1) Nicholas Griffiths (1973–8, 1982–94) Fabian Radcliffe O.P. (1959) John Pearson (1982–5) Colin Renfrew (1959) Jennifer Stringer (1990–3) Derek Roe (1959) Jeffrey Wallis (1988–3) John Saunders (1959) Research Assistants Finds supervisor Fiona Gale (1976–8) † Cedric Yardley (1959–63) Josephine Turquet (1974–9) Alison Tinniswood (1985–7) Photographers Tim Claydon (1987–9) Martin Biddle (1959) Jane Webster (1989–94) John Crook (1990–4) David C Haselden (1959–60) Stanislaus Witkowski (1960) CONTENTS List of colour plates.................................................................................................................................. xi List of figures ........................................................................................................................................... xii List of tables ......................................................................................................................................... xviii Preface ...................................................................................................................................................... xxi Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................xxiii PART I: INTRODUCTORY 1 General introduction by Martin Biddle .......................................................................................... 1 2 Methods of recording and study by Martin Biddle........................................................................ 5 PART II: CUDDINGTON 1 The excavation of Cuddington by Martin Biddle......................................................................... 14 2 The finds from Cuddington ............................................................................................................. 18 i. Pottery by Martin Biddle with commentary by Jacqui Pearce ................................... 18 ii. Jetton by Hugh Pagan........................................................................................................ 21 iii. Silver-gilt buckle pin by Martin Biddle .......................................................................... 21 iv. Window lead by Geoff Egan............................................................................................. 21 v. Copper-alloy by Alison H. Goodall................................................................................. 22 vi. Iron by Ian H. Goodall.......................................................................................................22 vii. Animal bone by Alison Locker ........................................................................................ 23 viii. Discussion by Martin Biddle ............................................................................................ 23 PART III: THE DOMESTIC MATERIAL FROM THE OCCUPATION OF THE PALACE AND BANQUETING HOUSE IN THE LATER SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 1 The groups of finds and their dating by Martin Biddle ............................................................... 25 i. The cleanliness of the palace ............................................................................................ 25 ii. Garderobes and artefacts as evidence for the occupation of Nonsuch ..................... 36 viii CONTENTS iii. Dated and datable artefacts .............................................................................................. 37 iv. Date ranges and dating conventions used in the study of datable artefacts from the palace.................................................................................................................... 52 v. The
Recommended publications
  • 140 ELSTEAD. SURREY. Deaconry of Surrey and Diocese of Winchester : It Is Supposed of the Late Li Ent-.-Gen
    140 ELSTEAD. SURREY. deaconry of Surrey and diocese of Winchester : it is supposed of the late Li ent-.-Gen. Sir F. Marshall (d. 1900), Mn. Combe, of ot.o have derived it.a name from having been the "station," Frensham, Mrs. Gooch, and Robert .Mowbra.1 Howard f'llq, .or "stead," of Ella, founder of the kingdom of SUMex. The of Droa.d Oak, Seale. The soil is partlv light loam and sand ; <Church of St, James is an a.ncient edifice of atone, with a belfry subsoil, gravel and sand. The crops a.re barley, wheat~ carrot.a, '8urmounted by a. spire and conWning 3 bells: the eo.rliest pot&toes and ryi.. The area is 4,080 a.ores of )and and 26 of 'Portion of the structure datea from the year 1128: the belfry water, of which 3,600 lieres are common land and 29 wa.ter; •&tair i1 formed out of a solid balk of oak, t.he steps being cut rateable value, £4,241 ; t.he population in 1901 was 904. into it: the stained east windo)I', ereoted in 1881, is a memorinl Hankley is a hamlet hruf a inile west >to Julia (Smith), wife of the late Sir William Raynes hart.; Sexton, Charles Fitkin. · ishe died Jan. 21, 1881 : the church wa.s restored in 1872, and Post, M. O. & T. 0., T. M. O.. E. D., P. P., S. D. & A. &. I. affords 270 sitt.ings. The register dates from the year 1539. 0.-Jonathan Blackman, 'ub-postmll3ter. Let.ters received ''the living is a rectory, net yearly value £200, with residence, from Godalming at 7.40 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • JAN BRUEGHEL the YOUNGER (1601 – Antwerp – 1678))
    VP4750 JAN BRUEGHEL THE YOUNGER (1601 – Antwerp – 1678)) Noli me tangere On copper, 9 ¼ x 14 ¾ ins. (23.5 x 37.5 cm) PROVENANCE Private collection, France, until 2015 The eldest son of Jan Brueghel the Elder, Jan the Younger followed closely in his father’s footsteps. After training with his father in Antwerp, he travelled to Italy in 1622, but his trip was cut short following the unexpected death of his father in 1625. He returned to Antwerp and took over the running of the family studio. From that time until 1651 he kept a journal (Dagboek) i detailing his activities which included selling pictures left by his father and completing half-finished works. His journal also shows that he maintained close relationships with many of his father’s patrons and collaborators. Jan the Younger adopted a similarly refined manner to that of his father, as well as many of his father’s most successful compositions. In time, he developed a more personal style and a repertoire of his own subjects. The episode known as Noli me tangere (touch me not) is found only in the Gospel according to St. John (20:14-18). After the Resurrection, Christ appeared to Mary Magdelene as she stood weeping by the empty tomb. At first, she did not recognise him, but supposing him to be a gardener, asked if he was the one who had removed Jesus’s body. Jesus then called her by name, whereupon she recognised him, exclaiming “Rabboni!” (Master), but Jesus responded, saying “Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my father” and bade her go to the disciples with the message that he was now risen.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Pottery from Romsey: an Overview
    Proc. Hampshire Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 67 (pt. II), 2012, 323–346 (Hampshire Studies 2012) MEDIEVAL POTTERY FROM ROMSEY: AN OVERVIEW By BEN JERVIS ABSTRACT is evidence of both prehistoric and Roman occupation, but this paper will deal only with This paper summarises the medieval pottery recovered the medieval archaeology, from the mid-Saxon from excavations undertaken by Test Valley Archae- period to the 16th century. ological Trust in Romsey, Hampshire from the Several excavations took place between the 1970’s–1990’s. A brief synthesis of the archaeology of 1970’s–90’s in the precinct of Romsey Abbey Romsey is presented followed by a dated catalogue of (see Scott 1996). It has been suggested on the pottery types identified, including discussions of the basis of historical evidence and a series fabric, form and wider affinities. The paper concludes of excavated, early, graves that the late Saxon with discussions of the supply of pottery to Romsey in abbey was built on the site of an existing eccle- the medieval period and also considers ceramic use siastical establishment, possibly a minster in the town. church (Collier 1990, 45; Scott 1996, 7). The foundation of the nunnery itself can be dated to the 10th century (Scott 1996, 158), but it INTRODUCTION was evacuated in AD 1001, due to the threat of Danish attack, being re-founded later in The small town of Romsey has been the focus the 11th century. The abbey expanded during of much archaeological excavation over the last the Norman period, with the building of the 30–40 years, but very little has been published choir and nave (Scott 1996, 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Network
    Milton Keynes, London Birmingham and the North Victoria Watford Junction London Brentford Waterloo Syon Lane Windsor & Shepherd’s Bush Eton Riverside Isleworth Hounslow Kew Bridge Kensington (Olympia) Datchet Heathrow Chiswick Vauxhall Airport Virginia Water Sunnymeads Egham Barnes Bridge Queenstown Wraysbury Road Longcross Sunningdale Whitton TwickenhamSt. MargaretsRichmondNorth Sheen BarnesPutneyWandsworthTown Clapham Junction Staines Ashford Feltham Mortlake Wimbledon Martins Heron Strawberry Earlsfield Ascot Hill Croydon Tramlink Raynes Park Bracknell Winnersh Triangle Wokingham SheppertonUpper HallifordSunbury Kempton HamptonPark Fulwell Teddington Hampton KingstonWick Norbiton New Oxford, Birmingham Winnersh and the North Hampton Court Malden Thames Ditton Berrylands Chertsey Surbiton Malden Motspur Reading to Gatwick Airport Chessington Earley Bagshot Esher TolworthManor Park Hersham Crowthorne Addlestone Walton-on- Bath, Bristol, South Wales Reading Thames North and the West Country Camberley Hinchley Worcester Beckenham Oldfield Park Wood Park Junction South Wales, Keynsham Trowbridge Byfleet & Bradford- Westbury Brookwood Birmingham Bath Spaon-Avon Newbury Sandhurst New Haw Weybridge Stoneleigh and the North Reading West Frimley Elmers End Claygate Farnborough Chessington Ewell West Byfleet South New Bristol Mortimer Blackwater West Woking West East Addington Temple Meads Bramley (Main) Oxshott Croydon Croydon Frome Epsom Taunton, Farnborough North Exeter and the Warminster Worplesdon West Country Bristol Airport Bruton Templecombe
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Archaeology: 070 333 Spring 2006 Prof C. Schrire Room 201
    Colonial Archaeology: 070 333 Spring 2006 Prof C. Schrire [email protected] Room 201/202 RAB Phone: 932 9006 Course Outline: This course will teach the rudiments of identification and analysis of colonial artifacts dating from about 1600-1900 AD. Our teaching collection includes a variety of ceramics, pipes, glass and small finds. The course if taught largely by supervision and not lectures. Students will sort collections, draw objects, measure objects and identify them according to numerous criteria. Course Requirements: A prerequisite for this course is 070: 208, Survey of Historical Archaeology, normally taught in the Fall term. Students for whom this requirement was waived are expected to study a suitable textbook on the subject, such as Orser, C. 1995 Historical Archaeology and Deetz, J In small things forgotten. Students will attend one three hour class, once a week. During this time they will handle material, analyze it, and draw objects. Each student will need a clean writing pad or notebook, a pad of graph paper, pencils, colored pencils, eraser, a ruler, and a divider. There will be two exams, a midterm and final. Useful Texts: 1. Noel-Hume, I. 2001. The Artifacts of Colonial America 2. Fournier, Robert. Illustrated Dictionary of Practical Pottery. Paperback, 4th ed. 2000 Radnor Pa. Available at Amazon.com ($31.96) 3. Numerous additional sources will be present at class for used during the practicals. Colonial Archaeology: 070 330 Significant technical terms: (see Fournier 2000) Absorption: The taking up of liquid into the pores of a pot. The water absorption of a ceramic is an indicator of its degree of vitrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from North Cheam
    Buses from North Cheam X26 Heathrow Terminals 2 & 3 93 Central Bus Station Putney Bridge River Thames Putney Hatton Cross PUTNEY Putney Heath Tibbet’s Corner Teddington Broad Street Wimbledon War Memorial River Thames 213 Kingston Wimbledon Kingston Faireld Bus Station Wood Street WIMBLEDON Norbiton Church KINGSTON South Wimbledon Kingston Hospital Kingston Morden Road Clarence Street Kenley Road The Triangle Hillcross Avenue Morden New Malden Lower Morden Lane Morden Cemetery 293 MORDEN NEW New Malden Fountain Morden South MALDEN Malden Road Motspur Park Hail & Ride Garth Road Rosebery Close section Epsom Road Rutland Drive MORDEN Malden Road Lyndhurst Drive Garth Road Browning Avenue Alpha Place Epsom Road Lower Morden Lane PARK Malden Road Plough Green Garth Road Stonecot Hill Stonecot Hill Sutton Common Road Hail & Ride Malden Road Dorchester Road Malden Green Green Lane section Stonecot Hill Burleigh Road Avenue S3 151 Langley Stonecot Hill Garth Road Malden Avenue Manor Central Road Longfellow Road Worcester Park St. Anthony’s Hospital Hail & Ride Manor Drive North Central Road Brabham Court section Hail & Ride The Cheam Common Road Lindsay Road section Manor Drive Staines Avenue Cheam Common Road London Road Langley Avenue Woodbine Lane Henley Avenue North Cheam Sports Club ST. HELIER Windsor Avenue Green C Wrythe Lane HE Kempton Road AM Thornton Road CO d RO M Sutton Cheam Tesco A MO [ Wrythe Green D N \ Z Oldelds Road Stayton Road St. Helier Hospital e Hail & Ride ] Wrythe Lane Sutton Common Road section K Sainsbury’s IN G The yellow tinted area includes every S Marlborough Road Hackbridge Corner M C St.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society
    Sources for Epsom & Ewell History Proceedings of the Leatherhead & District Local History Society The Leatherhead & District Local History Society was formed in 1946 for everyone interested in the history of the area including Ashtead, Bookham, Fetcham and Headley as well as Leatherhead. Since their foundation, they have been publishing an annual volume of Proceedings in a series which is currently in its seventh volume. Coming from an area that borders on Epsom, these Proceedings contain a great deal of material relating to our area and the following list which gives relevant articles and page references. The Society has its headquarters at the Leatherhead Museum, 64 Church Street, KT22 8DP. The Museum ([email protected]) is the best place to contact for their collection of records, which are in four series: original material (X), transcripts (W), photographs (P) and maps (M). The Society They meet for talks on the third Friday of the months from September to May meet at the Letherhead Institute at the top of Leatherhead High Street. For more details, see http://www.leatherheadlocalhistory.org.uk/. A.J. Ginger, ‘Fetcham in Victorian times: II’, Proc. of the LDLHS 1 (1947–56) iii pp14– 18. p16, memories of Happy Jack the tramp, and a case at Epsom Police Court. A.J. Ginger, ‘Leatherhead in Victorian times’, Proc. of the LDLHS 1 (1947–56) vii pp12– 18. p16, memories of Derby week. F. Bastian, ‘Leatherhead families of the 16th and 17th centuries: I, the Skeete family’, Proc. of the LDLHS 2 (1957–66) pp6–14. pp11–13, Edward Skeete moved to Ewell in the 1610s, and the family were yeomen and millers here for the next 50 years; they may be related to the Skeets of Barbados.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Kiely 20 July 2021
    Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road Epsom KT18 7EG Appeals A & B Proof of Evidence Mike Kiely 20 July 2021 Mike Kiely planning + regeneration Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom KT18 7EG | Proof of Evidence 2 Site Address Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom KT18 7EG (the Appeal Site) Description of Development Appeal A Description amended and agreed to take account of the Amended Plans: Demolition of the existing hospital buildings, accommodation block and associated structures and redevelopment of the site to provide a new care community for older people arranged in two buildings, comprising 301 care residences, 10 care apartments and 28 care suites proving transitional care, together with ancillary communal and support services Use Class C2, 24 key worker units Use Class C3, children’s nursery Use Class E, as well as associated back of house and service areas, car and cycle parking, altered vehicular and pedestrian access, landscaping, private amenity space and public open space. (Proposed Development A) Appeal B Demolition of the existing hospital buildings, accommodation block and associated structures and redevelopment of the site to provide a new care community for older people arranged in two buildings, comprising 267 care residences, 10 care apartments and 28 care suites proving transitional care, together with ancillary communal and support services Use Class C2, 24 key worker units Use Class C3, children’s nursery Use Class E, as well as associated back of house and service areas, car and cycle parking, altered
    [Show full text]
  • Durham City Guild Apprentices
    Durham City Guild Apprentices Indexed records DCG 1/1-3, 7, 9-11 DCG 9/1, 3, 6, 8 DCG 2/1; SANT/GUI/DUR/1 DCG 10/2, 4-5, 7-8 DCG 3/2, 4, 7-8 DCG 11/2, 7-8, 15-16 DCG 4/1-4, 6-7 DCG 12/3 DCG 5/2, 6 DCG 13/2 DCG 6/1-2, 5 DCG 15/1-2 DCG 7/1-2 DCG 16/1 GUIDE • This index comprises a list of all Durham City Guilds apprentices recorded in the above records, in alphabetical order. • Researchers are advised to browse widely among possible variant spellings of surnames. • Apprentices’ parents or guardians’ names, where present, precede masters’ names: s abbreviates ‘son of’, and es ‘eldest son of’. • Apprentices were often re-assigned or ‘turned over’ to new masters, in which cases an additional (adjacent) entry has been made in this index. These turn overs can be identified by checking individuals of the same name, parentage and indenture/registration date within the preceding 7-10 years. (While the date of such turn overs, when reported in the original record, is recorded in an underlying database, the first indenture/registration date is repeated in this index at each of an apprentice’s subsequent turn overs to aid identification.) • Two dates are usually available for each apprenticeship record, those of the apprenticeship indenture and of registration, the latter usually within a year of the former: where both dates are recorded only the indenture date has been reproduced below. • Where an apprenticeship was cancelled or not completed ‘X’ follows the date: reasons for such cancellations vary from death, abscondment, voluntary withdrawal, enlistment or ejection.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brochure
    1 2 RELAX. YOU’VE FOUND THE PERFECT PLACE FOR FAMILY LIVING. St Mary’s Place offers a pair of stunning semi- The area has many fee paying schools including ACS detached homes in the highly desirable area of International in Cobham and the highly regarded Oatlands in Weybridge, Surrey. independent St George’s College in Weybridge. The area is also noted for its excellent state schools, Each home is luxuriously appointed and meticulously which include Manby Lodge Infants School, St James designed for modern family living. CE Primary School, Cleves School, Oatlands School Oatlands, less than a mile from the town centre of and Heathside School. Weybridge, is a sought after location named after the Concept Developments take great care to create Royal Tudor and Stuart, Oatlands Palace. designs that bring together the best of classic and St Mary’s Place is perfectly positioned for commuting contemporary style. Our dedicated interiors company, into London and ideal for enjoying riverside walks, Concept Interiors, bring a unique touch of luxury; rural adventures, and all that this family friendly town sophisticated and beautiful designs featuring on-trend has to offer. interiors, and a superb quality finish. inspire | design | build 3 WELCOME TO YOUR NEW HOME TIMELESS YET ON TREND. CLASSIC YET CONTEMPORARY. THE BEAUTY IS IN THE DETAIL AT ST. MARY’S ROAD. One thing you’ll notice with a Concept The lower ground floor forms the informal hub of Developments property, is the attention to detail. the family home comprising a grand open-plan The difference is evident from the moment you enter kitchen with a breakfast bar and family room through the private gates.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did One Approach Otford Palace?
    How did one approach Otford Palace? Charles Shee How did one approach the Otford Palace? Charles Shee This article, based on the archives of the Otford and District Historical Society, was first published in the Otford History and Heritage Newsletter, Autumn 2019, no 19. It is included in the Otford Palace archive by kind permission of Charles Shee and Alan Williams, editor of the Newsletter. Walking from the Otford pond to the Palace it is easy to assume that the slightly elevated lane that passes Chantry Cottage was the access route to the 16C Archbishop ’s Palace. However, a moment’s reflection suggests that this is unlikely. The present narrow road (Palace Approach) leads towards the remaining north-western Tower, but the original main entrance, the Great Gatehouse, was actually significantly further to the east (Fig 1). The western half of the Great Gatehouse still exists, and is joined to the remaining tower by a row of cottages (Fig 1). Some readers will know the western Gatehouse as the building where the Guides used to meet. The eastern part of the Gatehouse and the long range running east towards the station, along with most of the rest of the Palace, were demolished and cleared away many years ago. Surely the original approach to the grand northern entrance of this magnificent palace must have been further to the east than the existing lane? None of the known accounts of the Palace tell us how the Great Gatehouse was approached from the north, nor are there any contemporary illustrations. The reconstruction model of the Palace by Rod Shelton (a “must see” in the Heritage Centre) and the guides to the Palace by local historians Cliff Ward and Rod Shelton leave it to the imagination how this approach way might have connected to the vicinity of the Otford pond or High Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia
    2007–2010 Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia Contributing Authors: David Givens, William M. Kelso, Jamie May, Mary Anna Richardson, Daniel Schmidt, & Beverly Straube William M. Kelso Beverly Straube Daniel Schmidt Editors March 2012 Structure 177 (Well) Structure 176 Structure 189 Soldier’s Pits Structure 175 Structure 183 Structure 172 Structure 187 1607 Burial Ground Structure 180 West Bulwark Ditch Solitary Burials Marketplace Structure 185 Churchyard (Cellar/Well) Excavations Prehistoric Test Ditches 28 & 29 Structure 179 Fence 2&3 (Storehouse) Ludwell Burial Structure 184 Pit 25 Slot Trenches Outlines of James Fort South Church Excavations Structure 165 Structure 160 East Bulwark Ditch 2 2 Graphics and maps by David Givens and Jamie May Design and production by David Givens Photography by Michael Lavin and Mary Anna Richardson ©2012 by Preservation Virginia and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. All rights reserved, including the right to produce this report or portions thereof in any form. 2 2 Acknowledgements (2007–2010) The Jamestown Rediscovery team, directed by Dr. William this period, namely Juliana Harding, Christian Hager, and Kelso, continued archaeological excavations at the James Matthew Balazik. Thank you to the Colonial Williamsburg Fort site from 2007–2010. The following list highlights Foundation architectural historians who have analyzed the some of the many individuals who contributed to the project fort buildings with us: Cary Carson, Willie Graham, Carl during these
    [Show full text]