Judiciary, Social Reform and Debate on 'Religious Prostitution' in Colonial India Author(s): Kalpana Kannabiran Source: Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 30, No. 43 (Oct. 28, 1995), pp. WS59-WS69 Published by: Economic and Political Weekly Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4403368 Accessed: 04-09-2017 06:56 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Economic and Political Weekly This content downloaded from 59.90.31.67 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 06:56:45 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Judiciary Social Reform and Debate on 'Religious Prostitutionin ColonialIndia Kalpana Kannabiran 'Devadasis' have been a subject of apparently opposed discourses for over a century and a half. On the one hand, various perceptions of them in the colonial period converged in a strong disapproval and condemnation of their moral conduct. On the other hand, both in the colonial period and, more importantly, in post-colonial scholarship, the fact that some of these women were performing artistes of repute provided the ground for a feminist resurrection that separated them from those that did not belong to these privileged traditions and placed them in a newly created space that redefined and respected their freedom, autonomy and creativity.