DOCSLIB.ORG

National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel Final Issue | 26 November 2018 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 254672-01 Ove Arup & Partners Ireland Limited 50 Ringsend Road Dublin 4 D04 T6X0 Ireland www.arup.com Document Verification Job title DART Expansion Project Job number 254672-01 Document title Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix File reference Park Tunnel Document ref Revision Date Filename DART Expansion_Feasibility_Four_Tracking_to_PPT.docx D raft 05 Nov Description Draft 2018 Prepared by Checked by Approved by Shane McLoughlin Name Conor Lavery Peter Adams / Darragh Beirne Signature First Issue 13 Nov Filename DART Expansion_Feasibility_Four_Tracking_to_PPT.docx 2018 Description First Issue Prepared by Checked by Approved by Shane McLoughlin Name Conor Lavery Peter Adams / Darragh Beirne Signature Final Issue 26 Nov Filename DART Expansion_Feasibility_Four_Tracking_to_PPT.docx 2018 Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Shane McLoughlin Name Conor Lavery Peter Adams / Darragh Beirne Signature Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue Document Verification with Document | Final Issue | 26 November 2018 P:\DART EXPANSION\PH1-CONCEPT&FEASIBILITY\DART EXPANSION_10 YEAR PLAN\PHASE 1 STUDIES\KILDARE LINE STUDY\2018 11 29 FINAL DRAFT REPORT & DRAWINGS\EDITABLE DOC\DART EXPANSION_FEASIBILITY_FOUR_TRACKING_TO_PPT_UPDATED TABLE.DOCX National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 1.1 DART Expansion and National Transport Policy 3 1.2 Background 4 1.3 Extent of Study Area 6 1.4 Aims and Objectives of the Study 6 2 Review of Previous Studies 8 2.1 Overview 8 2.2 DART Underground Phase 1 8 2.3 DART Underground Phase 2 9 2.4 DART Underground Phase 3 12 2.5 DART Underground Western Tie-In Study 13 2.6 Summary 14 3 Data Collection and Available Surveys 15 4 Identification of Principal Impacted Assets 16 4.1 OB7 Le Fanu Road Bridge 16 4.2 OB5A Kylemore Road Bridge 16 4.3 CIÉ Inchicore Works 16 4.4 OB5 Khyber Pass Footbridge 18 4.5 UB4 – Sarsfield Road Underbridge 19 4.6 OB3 – Longmeadows Bridge 20 4.7 Retaining Walls and Signal Box on Heuston Approaches 21 4.8 Road Junction at Islandbridge 23 4.9 Heuston Station and Yard 26 4.10 UB01 Liffey Bridge and Viaduct 27 4.11 Phoenix Park Tunnel 28 4.12 OBO2 - Conyngham Road Overbridge 29 5 Track Alignment 33 5.1 Alignment Objectives 33 5.2 IÉ Track Design Standards 33 5.3 DART System Requirements 33 5.4 Track Design Speeds and Horizontal Geometry Requirements 34 5.5 Track Cant 35 5.6 Vertical Track Geometry 37 5.7 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry at Stations 40 5.8 Track and Structure Clearances 40 | Final Issue | 26 November 2018 P:\DART EXPANSION\PH1-CONCEPT&FEASIBILITY\DART EXPANSION_10 YEAR PLAN\PHASE 1 STUDIES\KILDARE LINE STUDY\2018 11 29 FINAL DRAFT REPORT & DRAWINGS\EDITABLE DOC\DART EXPANSION_FEASIBILITY_FOUR_TRACKING_TO_PPT_UPDATED TABLE.DOCX National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel 5.9 Rolling Stock 44 5.10 Further Alignment Work Required 44 5.11 Potential Options for Future Development of the Alignment 45 6 Options Considered throughout the Study 46 6.1 Potential Kylemore Road Station 46 6.2 Islandbridge Junction Approach 46 6.3 OBO2 Conyngham Road Bridge 54 6.4 FFSS vs SSFF up to Hazelhatch and Track Amendments 55 7 Description of Emerging Preferred Option 60 7.1 Horizontal Track Design 60 7.2 Vertical alignment Design 61 7.3 Horizontal and Vertical Alignment Combinations 62 7.4 Applied Cant and Speed Assessment 63 7.5 Bridge Structures along the Alignment 64 7.6 Kylemore Road Station 67 7.7 Retaining Walls 67 7.8 Track alignment through the Inchicore Works 68 7.9 Property 69 7.10 Civils Design 69 8 Feasibility Working Cost Estimate 70 8.1 Basis of Cost Estimate 70 8.2 Feasibility Working Cost Estimate 70 9 Conclusions and Recommendations 72 9.1 Aims and Objectives 72 9.2 Options Assessment 72 9.3 Feasibility Working Cost Estimate 72 9.4 Recommendations 73 Appendices Appendix A Basis of Design - Electrical Pantograph Clearance Envelopes Appendix B Four Tracking Speed Study Appendix C DART Expansion - Kildare Line - Alignment Calculations | Final Issue | 26 November 2018 P:\DART EXPANSION\PH1-CONCEPT&FEASIBILITY\DART EXPANSION_10 YEAR PLAN\PHASE 1 STUDIES\KILDARE LINE STUDY\2018 11 29 FINAL DRAFT REPORT & DRAWINGS\EDITABLE DOC\DART EXPANSION_FEASIBILITY_FOUR_TRACKING_TO_PPT_UPDATED TABLE.DOCX National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel Appendix D Feasibility Working Cost Estimate Breakdown | Final Issue | 26 November 2018 P:\DART EXPANSION\PH1-CONCEPT&FEASIBILITY\DART EXPANSION_10 YEAR PLAN\PHASE 1 STUDIES\KILDARE LINE STUDY\2018 11 29 FINAL DRAFT REPORT & DRAWINGS\EDITABLE DOC\DART EXPANSION_FEASIBILITY_FOUR_TRACKING_TO_PPT_UPDATED TABLE.DOCX National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel Executive Summary DART Expansion was initially conceived in the early 1990’s as a scheme to expand the capacity of the electrified commuter network in the greater Dublin area in response to the increasing commuter passenger numbers. Design of the initial scheme linking all the lines through an underground tunnel link beneath the city centre was progressed and a Railway Order was made by An Bord Pleanála in December 2011 and perfected by the High Court in March 2014. However, in September 2015 the Government deferred authorisation for construction of DART Underground and instructed Iarnród Éireann to examine the current design with an objective of delivering a lower cost technical solution, whilst retaining the required rail connectivity for the DART Expansion Programme. The assessment review, including transport benefits modelling carried out by Iarnród Éireann and the NTA in 2016 and 2017 concluded that: DART Expansion with DART Underground offers the greatest benefits; Other network arrangement scenarios focused on delivering non-tunnel city centre capacity enhancements, with integration through the Phoenix Park Tunnel, allow early delivery of service capacity and met projected passenger demand in the short to medium term at a lower cost. This short to medium term non-tunnel DART Expansion network was included in the National Development Plan 2018-27 but noted that a DART Underground Tunnel alignment would be protected for potential future development. This decision requires alteration to the Kildare Line previously designed with the tie-in through the DART Underground tunnel from Inchicore. This Study reviews the options to tie-in the Kildare Line to the DART Expansion scheme connecting to the Phoenix Park Tunnel, in a manner which does not impede development of a DART Underground in the future. The current assessment has taken account of previous studies, including the DART Underground design and a subsequent Western Tie-In study carried out as part of the 2016 and 2017 DART Expansion review. The ultimate purpose of this Study is to review and co-ordinate all studies in light of the revised DART Expansion network and to recommend an integrated solution covering the immediate requirements of the DART Expansion with provision to allow future development of the DART Expansion. The key features of the review contained herein are to review options to complete the four tracking from its existing limit near Park West / Cherry Orchard into Heuston (previously incomplete due to the tie-in to the proposed DART Underground) and co-ordinate the alignment with the tie-in to the Heuston Yard and the Phoenix Park Tunnel in the East, and the existing four track to Hazelhatch in the West. | Final Issue | 26 November 2018 Page 1 P:\DART EXPANSION\PH1-CONCEPT&FEASIBILITY\DART EXPANSION_10 YEAR PLAN\PHASE 1 STUDIES\KILDARE LINE STUDY\2018 11 29 FINAL DRAFT REPORT & DRAWINGS\EDITABLE DOC\DART EXPANSION_FEASIBILITY_FOUR_TRACKING_TO_PPT_UPDATED TABLE.DOCX National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel This co-ordination includes the effects of changing the future track operational configuration from DART Lines on the north side of four tracking in the Phoenix Park Tunnel solution to DART Lines on the south side of four tracking in a DART Underground solution. The revised options include a station at Kylemore in lieu of the previous proposal for an Inchicore Station and different overbridge and structural solutions than those previously considered. This Study has concluded with a recommended solution to meet these requirements. | Final Issue | 26 November 2018 Page 2 P:\DART EXPANSION\PH1-CONCEPT&FEASIBILITY\DART EXPANSION_10 YEAR PLAN\PHASE 1 STUDIES\KILDARE LINE STUDY\2018 11 29 FINAL DRAFT REPORT & DRAWINGS\EDITABLE DOC\DART EXPANSION_FEASIBILITY_FOUR_TRACKING_TO_PPT_UPDATED TABLE.DOCX National Transport Authority DART Expansion Project Four Tracking from West of Hazelhatch to Phoenix Park Tunnel 1 Introduction 1.1 DART Expansion and National Transport Policy In September 2015, the revised Business Case for the DART Expansion Programme was published, and the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport Paschal Donohoe TD announced
Recommended publications
  • Conditions of Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage

    Conditions of Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage

    Conditions of Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage June 2004 Until Further Notice Conditions TEXT 30-6-04 5:49 PM Page 1 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SECTION A PAGE CONDITIONS OF CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS 1 Tickets are issued subject to conditions, byelaws and regulations 5 2 Refusal of access 5 3 Tickets not transferable 5 4Periods of validity of tickets 5 5 Available route of tickets 6 6 Through tickets and inter-available tickets 6 7 Change of train/station 6 8 Break of journey 7 9 Group travel 7 10 Using tickets from any other stations 7 11 Re-booking at intermediate stations 7 12 Production of tickets 7 13 Passengers entering wrong trains 8 14Children 8 15 Kid + Family tickets 8 16 Fraudulent use of authorisation documents 8 17 Torn, mutilated, lost or stolen unused tickets 9 18 Travelling in superior class of carriage 9 19 Accommodation in trains 9 20 Timetable and train services 10 21 Closing of entrances to and exits from stations and platforms 10 22 Purchase of tickets - change 10 23 Validation of tickets 10 24Refunds 11 25 Free travel scheme for holders of free travel cards 11 1 Conditions TEXT 30-6-04 5:49 PM Page 2 SECTION B CONDITIONS OF ISSUE OF TICKETS FOR INTERNAL TRAVEL ON THE DUBLIN SUBURBAN RAIL SECTION 26 Conditions Of Issue Of Tickets For Internal Travel 12 27 Single tickets 12 28 Ordinary return tickets 12 29 All other tickets 12 30 Validation of tickets 12 31 Children (other than school children) 12 32 Children (travelling to and from school only) 12 33 Schoolchild 5 Day tickets (travelling to and from school only) 13 34Scholar
  • US Army Railroad Course Railway Track Maintenance II TR0671

    US Army Railroad Course Railway Track Maintenance II TR0671

    SUBCOURSE EDITION TR0671 1 RAILWAY TRACK MAINTENANCE II Reference Text (RT) 671 is the second of two texts on railway track maintenance. The first, RT 670, Railway Track Maintenance I, covers fundamentals of railway engineering; roadbed, ballast, and drainage; and track elements--rail, crossties, track fastenings, and rail joints. Reference Text 671 amplifies many of those subjects and also discusses such topics as turnouts, curves, grade crossings, seasonal maintenance, and maintenance-of-way management. If the student has had no practical experience with railway maintenance, it is advisable that RT 670 be studied before this text. In doing so, many of the points stressed in this text will be clarified. In addition, frequent references are made in this text to material in RT 670 so that certain definitions, procedures, etc., may be reviewed if needed. i THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. ii CONTENTS Paragraph Page INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1. TRACK REHABILITATION............................................................. 1.1 7 Section I. Surfacing..................................................................................... 1.2 8 II. Re-Laying Rail............................................................................ 1.12 18 III. Tie Renewal................................................................................ 1.18 23 CHAPTER 2. TURNOUTS AND SPECIAL SWITCHES........................................................................................
  • 41 Dáil Éireann

    41 Dáil Éireann

    (Supplementary Order Paper) 41 DÁIL ÉIREANN Dé Céadaoin, 10 Bealtaine, 2017 Wednesday, 10th May, 2017 12 meán lae 12 noon GNÓ COMHALTAÍ PRÍOBHÁIDEACHA PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS Fógra i dtaobh Leasuithe ar Thairiscint : Notice of Amendments to Motion 102. “That Dáil Éireann: recognises: — that transport and travel trends within the Greater Dublin Area are unsustainable, congestion is increasing, transport emissions are growing, economic competitiveness is suffering and quality of life for commuters and inhabitants is declining; — the capacity of the Dublin region as a destination for living, visiting and for locating and doing business is being seriously undermined; — that significant actions are required to increase capacity and usability of public transport, to better manage traffic during peak periods and to reduce the private car share dependence by commuting traffic especially; — that the population in the Greater Dublin Area is expected to grow by 22 per cent to 1.8 million by 2030 and by 26 per cent to 700,000 in the Mid-East Region alone including Kildare, Meath and Wicklow and increasing investment in rail services including the Dublin Area Rapid Transport (DART) expansion, as well as vital bus services including Bus Rapid Transit, is absolutely essential; — that this Government lacks a comprehensive vision and strategic plan for how to cope with future public transport demand in the core Dublin City Area as well as the Greater Dublin Area; and — that the Capital Plan is emblematic of the lack of ambition, vision and forward planning for public transport; acknowledges: — that many of the main arterial routes into Dublin, including the M50, either have already reached operational capacity or are expected to reach capacity in the near future; — the lack of preparation and forward planning for the impact of the Luas Cross City, including the impact of its construction on city trade and mobility; P.T.O.
  • Annex 2.1 Review of Planning and Policy Documents

    Annex 2.1 Review of Planning and Policy Documents

    DART+ West Iarnród Éireann Option Selection Report Volume 2: Technical Report MAY-MDC-GEN-ROUT-RP-Y-0001 April 2021 Option Selection Report Volume 4: Annex 2.1 Review of Planning and Policy Documents Table of contents 1. Review of Planning and Policy Documents ................................................................................. 4 1.1 Policy Context ................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 EU Policy ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 National Policy .................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Regional Policy ............................................................................................................... 12 1.5 Local Policy ..................................................................................................................... 16 MAY-MDC-GEN-ROUT-RP-Y-0002 Annex 2.1 i Option Selection Report Volume 4: Annex 2.1 Review of Planning and Policy Documents Glossary Abbreviation Meaning BRT Bus Rapid Transit CIÉ Córas Iompair Éireann CRR Commission for Railway Regulation DART Dublin Area Rapid Transit (IÉ’s Electrified Network) DCDP Dublin City Development Plan DTTAS Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport DU DART Underground EMRA Eastern and Midland Regional Assembly GDA Greater Dublin Area GHG Greenhouse gas GSWR Great Southern & Western Railway IÉ /
  • PL29S.246098 Developmen

    PL29S.246098 Developmen

    An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report Appeal Reference No: PL29S.246098 Development: The dismantling and deconstruction of the existing Telephone Exchange Building for its storage at the Inchicore Stores Building (within the curtilage of a Protected Structure) at Inchicore Rail Works, Inchicore. Planning Application Planning Authority: Dublin City Council Planning Authority Reg. Ref.: 3929/15 Applicant: Iarnród Éireann Planning Authority Decision: Refuse Permission Planning Appeal Appellant(s): Iarnród Éireann Type of Appeal: First Party Observers: None Date of Site Inspection: 4th of May 2016 Inspector: Angela Brereton PL29S.246098 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 12 1.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The property is located and accessed in the Irish Rail yard at Inchicore. This is to the west of the residential area of Inchicore Terrace South and accessed via Inchicore Parade at the end of St. Patrick’s Terrace. The railway line runs to the north of the site. The Plans submitted show the small area of the building in the context of the other buildings within the Inchicore Works Compound and as shown on the land ownership map. While there are many older more historic buildings within the landholding, there are also some more recently built. The Iarnród Éireann site is fully operational and has a security gated entrance and on-site parking. This is a detached stone/timber/slate building and there are two main rooms with connecting hallway. This small building is now cordoned off with security barriers and does not appear to be operational. It is adjacent to a pond area which also provides a water supply in case of fire.
  • Issues Associated with Planning, Implementing, Managing and Operating Public Transport Projects in Ireland

    Issues Associated with Planning, Implementing, Managing and Operating Public Transport Projects in Ireland

    Urban Transport XIX 79 Issues associated with planning, implementing, managing and operating public transport projects in Ireland R. Byrne Murray1, M. Murphy1 & A. Ahern2 1College of Engineering and Built Environment, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland 2School of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University College Dublin, Ireland Abstract Whilst considering the context to which public transport is planned in Ireland and internationally, the research has been concerned with studying the methodology and the roles of key stakeholders for the planning, implementation, management and operation of public transport projects in order to gauge the efficiency and suitability of the Irish planning process in relation to our international counterparts The paper will present principal findings from structured interviews undertaken with key stakeholders involved in the Irish process and will provide a basis for debating the issues raised as a consequence of these interviews. Key issues raised include: 1) the possible complexity of the planning process in Ireland; 2) the role of political agendas in the decision making process; and 3) the governance and institutional arrangements for planning public transport projects in Ireland in contrast with other international countries. Keywords: public transport planning, institutional arrangements, governance, political agendas, public transport decision making, planning process, Irish planning, transport planning issues, stakeholders, planning complexities. 1 Introduction Whilst considering
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    Introduction The purpose of this document is to outline my vision for Ireland in 2040. I write this document in the context of lessons learned from Irish planning and transport history, specifically, the history of the M50 Dublin orbital motorway and its hinterland. Using this initial context and the lessons to be learned as a back drop I will outline my vision of Ireland in 2040 and beyond breaking it down into the following sections Planning, National Infrastructure, Regional Infrastructure and Miscellaneous I am cognisant that what I envision may seem extraordinary for today’s Ireland, however it is worth remembering that 30 short years ago, the M50 was an extraordinary project yet we didn’t envision that today over 159,000 vehicles per day would use it. Let us learn from history and plan for 2040 with these lessons to the forefront of our imagination and designs. Context M50 & Hinterland Initially conceived in 1971 as part of the Dublin Transportation Study, the M50 was intended to be an orbital bypass of the city. Construction began in 1987 with work being carried out in sections. By the time the project was completed in 2005 the M50 was already at capacity and overwhelmed by a very different requirement, namely suburban commuters. Upgrades started in 2006 to expand and relieve congestion. How could this have happened? Since the original plan was for a bypass to remove mainly HGV, regional and national traffic from Dublin city centre the expected volumes of traffic and the traffic density were not designed for. Junctions were not free flow and two lanes was considered enough to handle capacity.
  • Nurail Project ID: Nurail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale

    Nurail Project ID: Nurail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale

    NURail project ID: NURail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals By Mingzhou Jin Professor Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] David B. Clarke Director of the Center for Transportation Research University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] Grant Number: DTRT12-G-UTC18 March 2, 2016 Page 1 of 6 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. March 2, 2016 Page 2 of 6 TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals Introduction This project has developed a yard capacity model for macro-level analysis. The study considers the detailed sequence and scheduling in classification yards and their impacts on yard capacities simulate typical freight railroad terminals, and statistically analyses of the historical and simulated data regarding dwell-time and traffic flows. Approach and Methodology The team developed optimization models to investigate three sequencing decisions are at the areas inspection, hump, and assembly.
  • Chief Executive's Report on Submissions Received to Issues Paper

    Chief Executive's Report on Submissions Received to Issues Paper

    KILDARE COUNTY COUNCIL Chief Executive’s Report Submissions received on Strategic Issues Paper Celbridge & Castletown pre-draft Local Area Plan 2016-2022 Forward Planning, Planning Department June 2016 (amended September 2016) Celbridge Local Area Plan 2016-2022 Pre Draft Consultation Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Pre Draft Consultation Phase ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Submissions Received ........................................................................................................................... 4 4. Summary of Submissions ...................................................................................................................... 5 5. Chief Executive’s Response ................................................................................................................ 31 5.1 Plan Boundary and Zoning ................................................................................................................ 31 5.2 Location of Residential Zoned Land .................................................................................................. 31 5.3 Heritage and Tourism........................................................................................................................ 32 5.4 Traffic/Connectivity .........................................................................................................................
  • Waterford Bypass

    Waterford Bypass

    ENGINEERS IRELAND WATERFORD BYPASS WATERFORD BYPASS JOHN T. MURPHY, BE, CEng, FIEI, HDipMM, RConsEI Project Director, Mott MacDonald Ireland JOE SHINKWIN, BE, CEng, MIEI, DipMechEng Project Manager, Mott MacDonald Ireland Presented to a meeting of the Cork Region of Engineers Ireland 23rd February 2010 SYNOPSIS The N25 Waterford Bypass comprises a 16.3 km of dual carriageway bypass of Waterford City, 9.5 km of major link roads and an additional 13 km of side roads. It includes a 465 metre long dual carriageway cable-stayed bridge over the River Suir (with a 230m main span), plus a number of major viaduct and grade separated interchange structures totalling over 50 bridges. This paper describes the development of the current route for the N25 Waterford Bypass including the various phases of route selection. It deals with the project’s inclusion as a pilot PPP project and the development of the PPP contract. It follows the project through the statutory processes (including the discovery of Viking remains and the need to find a new route around the designated national monument site in Woodstown). The paper also describes the selection of the chosen bridge type for the Suir River Crossing and looks at some of the other major structures. Finally, the paper will briefly describe the construction contract and various aspects of construction. 1 MURPHY and SHINKWIN INTRODUCTION crossing of the Suir in the Waterford viii) were evaluated without area would impose costs on, and quantification while items v), vi), and vii) The need for a second river crossing of produce benefits for, the community at were derived in the process of the the River Suir in Waterford has been large.
  • Coverrailway Curves Book.Cdr

    Coverrailway Curves Book.Cdr

    RAILWAY CURVES March 2010 (Corrected & Reprinted : November 2018) INDIAN RAILWAYS INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PUNE - 411 001 i ii Foreword to the corrected and updated version The book on Railway Curves was originally published in March 2010 by Shri V B Sood, the then professor, IRICEN and reprinted in September 2013. The book has been again now corrected and updated as per latest correction slips on various provisions of IRPWM and IRTMM by Shri V B Sood, Chief General Manager (Civil) IRSDC, Delhi, Shri R K Bajpai, Sr Professor, Track-2, and Shri Anil Choudhary, Sr Professor, Track, IRICEN. I hope that the book will be found useful by the field engineers involved in laying and maintenance of curves. Pune Ajay Goyal November 2018 Director IRICEN, Pune iii PREFACE In an attempt to reach out to all the railway engineers including supervisors, IRICEN has been endeavouring to bring out technical books and monograms. This book “Railway Curves” is an attempt in that direction. The earlier two books on this subject, viz. “Speed on Curves” and “Improving Running on Curves” were very well received and several editions of the same have been published. The “Railway Curves” compiles updated material of the above two publications and additional new topics on Setting out of Curves, Computer Program for Realignment of Curves, Curves with Obligatory Points and Turnouts on Curves, with several solved examples to make the book much more useful to the field and design engineer. It is hoped that all the P.way men will find this book a useful source of design, laying out, maintenance, upgradation of the railway curves and tackling various problems of general and specific nature.
  • Arthur's Way Heritage Trail

    Arthur's Way Heritage Trail

    HERITAGE TRAIL Arthur’s Way is a heritage trail across northeast County Kildare that follows in the footsteps of Arthur Guinness. In just 16 km, it links many of the historic sites associated with Ireland’s most famous brewers – the Guinness family. Visitors are invited to explore Celbridge - where Arthur spent his childhood, Leixlip - the site of his first brewery and Oughterard graveyard - Arthur’s final resting place near his ancestral home. The trail rises gently from the confluence of the Liffey and Rye rivers at Leixlip to the Palladian Castletown House estate and onto Celbridge. It then departs the Liffey Valley to join the Grand Canal at Hazelhatch. The grassy towpaths guide visitors past beautiful flora and fauna and the enchanting Lyons Estate. At Ardclough, the route finally turns for Oughterard which offers spectacular views over Kildare, Dublin and the Province of Leinster. R o yaal l C a MAAYNOOTHYNOOTH nnala l R . L i e y 7 LEIXXLIXLLIP M4 6 5 N4 CELBBRIBRRIDGE DDUBLINUBLIN HHAZELHATCHAZELHAAAZZZELHATCELHHAATCH R . L i e y l a n a C d STRAFFAN n ra G NEWCASTLE 7 ARDCLOUGGHH N THHEE VVILLAGVILLAGEILLAGE AATT LLYONYONS CLLANEANE 4 RATHCOOLE OUGHTEERARDRRARDARD l 5 a nnal a C d nnd 6 a r G N7 y SSALLINSALLINS e 7 i L . R 8 9 NNAASAAS STAGES AND POINTS OF INTEREST STAGE POINTS OF INTEREST LEIXLIP to Arthur Guinness Square, Original Brewery Site, St. Mary’s Church, CELBRIDGE Leixlip Castle, The Wonderful Barn CELBRIDGE to Batty Langley Lodge, Castletown House, 22 Main Street, Oakley Park, HAZELHATCH Malting House, Celbridge Abbey, The Mill HAZELHATCH to Hazelhatch Railway Station, Hazelhatch Bridge, LYONS ESTATE The Grand Canal LYONS ESTATE to Aylmer’s Bridge, Lyons House, The Village at Lyons, OUGHTERARD Henry Bridge, Ardclough Village, Oughterard Graveyard LEIXLIP CELBRIDGE HAZELHATCH ARDCLOUGH OUGHTERARD 5 km 3 km 5 km 3 km 0 km Castletown House 5 km 8 km Lyons Estate 13 km 16 km LENGTH: 16km approx.