Incidence of Cephalosporin Resistance Among Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Ibadan, South- Western Nigeria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Incidence of Cephalosporin Resistance Among Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Ibadan, South- Western Nigeria International Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research Volume 4 Issue 3 September – December 2015 www.ijmbr.com © Oladipo et al. ; licensee Michael Joanna Publications Original Article Open Access Incidence of cephalosporin resistance among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Ibadan, South- Western Nigeria Oladipo E.K*, Oloke J.K, Omomowo I.O., Oyeniran A.O, Awoyelu E.H, Ogundele S.O Department of Pure and Applied Biology (Microbiology Unit), Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 17.09.15; Accepted: 04.12.15; Published: 12.12.15 ABSTRACT Background: The emergence of beta-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major global challenge, particularly, the rise in the resistance to 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins. Aim: This study was carried out to determine the resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to different generations of cephalosporins. Methods: A total number of one hundred clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were collected from June to November 2014 at University Teaching Hospital Ibadan, Oyo State. These were tested for their sensitivity to antibiotics by means of disc diffusion method using prepared antibiotics disc containing different µ of antibiotics; Ce fotaxine (30µ), Cefaclor (30µ), Cefamandole (30µ), Cefixime (5µ), Cefepime (30µ), Cefpodoxime (30µ) and Ceftazidime (30µ). Results: Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed absolute resistance to all antibiotics used except Ceftazidime, and Cefepime which are third a nd fourth generation of cephalosporin respectively. Ceftazidime had minimal resistant of 21% and higher susceptibility rate of 76%, Cefepime had the highest susceptibility rate of 90% and minimal resistance of 6%. Cefotaxime and Cefpodoxime had minimal int ermediate of 1%, Ceftazidime of 3% and Cefepime of 4%. Conclusion: The result from this study provided more evidence that among third generation of cephalosporins used, some are more active than the other while fourth generation is still the most effective of all other generations. Knowledge on the distribution of cephalosporin-resistant organisms is of ultimate importance as a guide in empirical therapy, taking note of preventive strategies as well as control measures against the spread of resistant microorganisms. Key words: Cephalosporins, resistance, susceptibility, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, antibiotics, organism INTRODUCTION diseases. Emergence and dissemination of β- lactam resistance in nosocomial Resistance of pathogenic organisms has Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas become a worldwide problem with serious aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumanni have consequence on the treatment of infectious pose a serious problem worldwide, especially the increasing resistance to different This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons Attribution 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Oladipo et al .: Cephalosporin resistance among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa generations of Cephalosporins.[1] Infections isolates to different generations of due to gram-negative organisms, cephalosporin. Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the most common, continue to be one of the leading METHODOLOGY causes of health care-acquired infections as well as morbidity and mortality in the Study area [2,3] healthcare system. Pseudomonas This research was carried out in Ibadan, Oyo aeruginosa , a gram-negative bacterium, is State, South Western part of Nigeria, in order found in healthcare-associated infections to determine the resistance pattern of clinical especially in patients who have been isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hospitalized more than a week and is reported different generations of cephalosporin among in different outbreaks of infections such as the patients at University Teaching Hospital pneumonia, bacteremia, urinary tract infection, Ibadan, Oyo state, Nigeria over a period of five and endocarditis, which are often complicated months (June to November 2014). [4,5] and potentially life-threatening. Wound infections have been the leading reservoir for Bacterial isolates [6] the bacterium as well as burn patients. A total number of one hundred (100) clinical Cephalosporins are used to treat a wide isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from variety of bacterial infections caused by different clinical sites including burns, wounds Pseudomonas aeruginosa not limited to and ear were used for this study. These respiratory tract infections, otitis media, samples were obtained from University gonorrhoea, skin infections, urinary tract Teaching Hospital Ibadan. [7] infections and sexually transmitted diseases. [2,3] [1] According to Oladipo et al ., Eyo et al ., and Processing of samples [8] Ramalingam et al ., the fundamental Media were prepared according to the mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa manufacturer’s instructions and sterilized at resistance to cephalosporin involves the 121 0C for 15min at 15 lb pressure. The production of enzymes, extended spectrum β- inoculum were standardized using the lactamases (ESBLs) that aids in the bacterium MacFarland standard.[2,3] resistance, that is, bacterial resistance to beta- lactam antibiotics is due to the enzymatic Susceptibility test inactivation of antibiotics, that is, the The susceptibility test was conducted using production of enzyme β-lactamase which the Kirby- Bauer method of sensitivity hydrolyses the β-lactam ring of the antibiotics determination.[2,3] Petri – dishes of Mueller rendering them inactive. Extensive use and Hinton agar were prepared according to the misuse of antibiotics of the public alongside manufacturer’s instruction. 0.1ml of inappropriate practices of unskilled health Pseudomonas aeruginosa equivalent to 0.5 workers and practitioners have led to the McFarland standard was seeded into each of increasing resistance of nosocomial the Petri-dishes containing Mueller-Hinton microorganisms. agar using sterile swabs. [2] These were allowed to stand for 45min to enable the Different generations of cephalosporin, first, inoculated organisms to pre-diffusion. [3] The second, third and fourth generations, are antibiotics discs of Cefadroxil (30µg; Oxoid, broad spectrum antimicrobial agents with UK), Cefotaxim (30µg; Oxoid, UK), enhanced activity against both gram-positive Cefamandole (30µg; Oxoid, UK), Cefador [3] and gram-negative organisms. They have (30µg; Oxoid, UK), Cefpodoxime (10µg; Oxoid, been assured successful in the treatment of UK), Cefixime (5µg; Oxoid, UK) and Cefepime severe and multi-drug resistant infections, (30µg; Oxoid, UK) were aseptically placed on however, increased prevalence of nosocomial the surfaces of the sensitivity agar plates. [2,3] strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance These were incubated aerobically for 18–24 to cephalosporin among clinical isolates has hours at 37ºC and the radial zone of inhibitions [9] been reported. Knowledge on the distribution were taken. [2,3] The results were expressed as of cephalosporin-resistant organisms is susceptible, intermediate or resistant important for guide in empirical therapy, taking according to criteria developed by Clinical note of preventive strategies as well as control Laboratory Standard Institute.[10,11] measures against the spread of resistant microorganisms. This study therefore is Statistical analysis designed to determine the antimicrobial Susceptibility rates were analyzed using susceptibility pattern of selected clinical ANOVA at significant level of P≤0.05. All interval estimates are 95% confidence Int J Med Biomed R es 2015;4 (3): 13 5-141 136 Oladipo et al .: Cephalosporin resistance among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa intervals. SPSS program for Windows (version remaining 10(21.3%) were resistant. 16.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used. 42(89.4%) of the isolate were susceptible to Cefepime, 2(4.3%) showed intermediate effect RESULTS and 3(6.4%) were resistant. All the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from this Distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa site were resistant to Cefotaxime, from different sites Cefamandole, Cefador and Cefixime. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the Summarily, the susceptibility rate of different sites. Ear swab was 23, burns was 30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Cefotaxime was while wound swabs was 47. 0% sensitive, 1% intermediate and 99.0% resistant. Cefamandole was 0% sensitive, 0% Resistance pattern of Pseudomonas intermediate and 100% resistant. Cefador was aeruginosa to different generations of 0% sensitive, 0% intermediate and 100% Cephalosporin resistant. Cefpodoxime was 0% sensitive, 1% From table 1, out of 23 Pseudomonas intermediate and 99.0% resistant. Cefixime aeruginosa isolated from ear swab, 17(73.9%) was 0% sensitive, 0% intermediate and 100% were susceptible to Ceftazidime while the resistant. Ceftazidime was 76% sensitive, remaining 6(26.1%) were resistant. 19(89.2%) 3.0% intermediate and 21% resistant. of the isolates were susceptible to Cefepime Cefepime was 90% sensitive, 4% intermediate while 2(8.9%) showed intermediate effect. All and 6.0% resistant. The overall resistant the isolates were resistant to Cefotaxime, pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Cefamandole, Cefador, Cefpodoxime and different generations of cephalosporin was Cefixime. 23% sensitive, 1.3% intermediate and 75.0%
Recommended publications
  • Medical Review(S) Clinical Review
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 200327 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type NDA Application Number(s) 200327 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) December 29, 2009 Received Date(s) December 30, 2009 PDUFA Goal Date October 30, 2010 Division / Office Division of Anti-Infective and Ophthalmology Products Office of Antimicrobial Products Reviewer Name(s) Ariel Ramirez Porcalla, MD, MPH Neil Rellosa, MD Review Completion October 29, 2010 Date Established Name Ceftaroline fosamil for injection (Proposed) Trade Name Teflaro Therapeutic Class Cephalosporin; ß-lactams Applicant Cerexa, Inc. Forest Laboratories, Inc. Formulation(s) 400 mg/vial and 600 mg/vial Intravenous Dosing Regimen 600 mg every 12 hours by IV infusion Indication(s) Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection (ABSSSI); Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) Intended Population(s) Adults ≥ 18 years of age Template Version: March 6, 2009 Reference ID: 2857265 Clinical Review Ariel Ramirez Porcalla, MD, MPH Neil Rellosa, MD NDA 200327: Teflaro (ceftaroline fosamil) Table of Contents 1 RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ......................................... 9 1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action ........................................................... 10 1.2 Risk Benefit Assessment.................................................................................. 10 1.3 Recommendations for Postmarketing Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    Product Monograph PrORB-CEFUROXIME Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets, USP 250 mg and 500 mg cefuroxime/tablet Antibiotic Orbus Pharma Inc. Date of Preparation: February 25, 2009 20 Konrad Crescent Markham, Ontario Control #: 117041 L3R8T4 1 Product Monograph PrORB-CEFUROXIME Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets, USP 250 mg and 500 mg cefuroxime/tablet Antibiotic Actions and Clinical Pharmacology Cefuroxime axetil is an orally active prodrug of cefuroxime. After oral administration, cefuroxime axetil is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and rapidly hydrolyzed by nonspecific esterases in the intestinal mucosa and blood to release cefuroxime into the blood stream. Conversion to cefuroxime, the microbiologically active form, occurs rapidly. The inherent properties of cefuroxime are unaltered after its administration as cefuroxime axetil. Cefuroxime exerts its bactericidal effect by binding to an enzyme or enzymes referred to as penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis. This binding results in inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis and subsequent cell death. Specifically, cefuroxime shows high affinity for PBP 3, a primary target for cefuroxime in gram- negative organisms such as E. coli. Comparative Bioavailability Studies A two-way crossover, randomized, blinded, single-dose bioequivalence study was performed on 22 normal, healthy, non-smoking male subjects under fasting conditions. The rate and extent of absorption of cefuroxime axetil was measured and compared following a single oral dose (1 x 500 mg tablet)
    [Show full text]
  • AMEG Categorisation of Antibiotics
    12 December 2019 EMA/CVMP/CHMP/682198/2017 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary use (CVMP) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Categorisation of antibiotics in the European Union Answer to the request from the European Commission for updating the scientific advice on the impact on public health and animal health of the use of antibiotics in animals Agreed by the Antimicrobial Advice ad hoc Expert Group (AMEG) 29 October 2018 Adopted by the CVMP for release for consultation 24 January 2019 Adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation 31 January 2019 Start of public consultation 5 February 2019 End of consultation (deadline for comments) 30 April 2019 Agreed by the Antimicrobial Advice ad hoc Expert Group (AMEG) 19 November 2019 Adopted by the CVMP 5 December 2019 Adopted by the CHMP 12 December 2019 Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2020. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Categorisation of antibiotics in the European Union Table of Contents 1. Summary assessment and recommendations .......................................... 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................ 7 2.1. Background ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalosporins Can Be Prescribed Safely for Penicillin-Allergic Patients ▲
    JFP_0206_AE_Pichichero.Final 1/23/06 1:26 PM Page 106 APPLIED EVIDENCE New research findings that are changing clinical practice Michael E. Pichichero, MD University of Rochester Cephalosporins can be Medical Center, Rochester, NY prescribed safely for penicillin-allergic patients Practice recommendations an allergic reaction to cephalosporins, ■ The widely quoted cross-allergy risk compared with the incidence of a primary of 10% between penicillin and (and unrelated) cephalosporin allergy. cephalosporins is a myth (A). Most people produce IgG and IgM antibodies in response to exposure to ■ Cephalothin, cephalexin, cefadroxil, penicillin1 that may cross-react with and cefazolin confer an increased risk cephalosporin antigens.2 The presence of of allergic reaction among patients these antibodies does not predict allergic, with penicillin allergy (B). IgE cross-sensitivity to a cephalosporin. ■ Cefprozil, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, Even penicillin skin testing is generally not ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone do not predictive of cephalosporin allergy.3 increase risk of an allergic reaction (B). Reliably predicting cross-reactivity ndoubtedly you have patients who A comprehensive review of the evidence say they are allergic to penicillin shows that the attributable risk of a cross- U but have difficulty recalling details reactive allergic reaction varies and is of the reactions they experienced. To be strongest when the chemical side chain of safe, we often label these patients as peni- the specific cephalosporin is similar to that cillin-allergic without further questioning of penicillin or amoxicillin. and withhold not only penicillins but Administration of cephalothin, cepha- cephalosporins due to concerns about lexin, cefadroxil, and cefazolin in penicillin- potential cross-reactivity and resultant IgE- allergic patients is associated with a mediated, type I reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled an Oral Dosage Form of Ceftriaxone Sodium Using Enteric
    A Thesis entitled An oral dosage form of ceftriaxone sodium using enteric coated sustained release calcium alginate beads by Darshan Lalwani Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Pharmaceutical Sciences with Industrial Pharmacy Option _________________________________________ Jerry Nesamony, Ph.D., Committee Chair _________________________________________ Sai Hanuman Sagar Boddu, Ph.D, Committee Member _________________________________________ Youssef Sari, Ph.D., Committee Member _________________________________________ Patricia R. Komuniecki, PhD, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2015 Copyright 2015, Darshan Narendra Lalwani This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of An oral dosage form of ceftriaxone sodium using enteric coated sustained release calcium alginate beads by Darshan Lalwani Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Pharmaceutical Sciences with Industrial Pharmacy option The University of Toledo May 2015 Purpose: Ceftriaxone (CTZ) is a broad spectrum semisynthetic, third generation cephalosporin antibiotic. It is an acid labile drug belonging to class III of biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS). It can be solvated quickly but suffers from the drawback of poor oral bioavailability owing to its limited permeability through
    [Show full text]
  • Citrobacter Spp. THOMAS D
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, May 1984, p. 591-595 Vol. 25, No. 5 0066-4804/84/050591-05$02.00/0 Copyright C 1984, American Society for Microbiology Development of Resistance to Cephalosporins in Clinical Strains of Citrobacter spp. THOMAS D. GOOTZ,t* DAVID B. JACKSON, AND JOHN C. SHERRIS Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Received 28 September 1983/Accepted 21 February 1984 The predominant beta-lactam antibiogram of Citrobacterfreundii resembles that of Enterobacter cloacae in demonstrating resistance to cephalothin and cefoxitin with susceptibility to the newer cephalosporins. Four representative strains of C. freundii were reversibly induced to high-level beta-lactamase production by cefoxitin, and mutants with stable, high-level production were selected with cefamandole. The mutants were resistant to several second- and third-generation cephalosporins. Comparisons of isoelectric points and substrate profiles of beta-lactamases from wild-type, induced wild-type, and mutant organisms suggested a close relationship to those from E. cloacae and indicated that C. freundii mutants, like those of E. cloacae, were derepressed for production of beta-lactamase. One primary isolate of C. freundii resembled the mutants in all characteristics. In contrast, most strains of Citrobacter diversus were susceptible to all cephalosporins, and two representative strains showed neither inducible nor mutational resistance. Cefoxitin induction to enhanced beta-lactamase production was demonstrated in a cephalothin- resistant isolate, and a derepressed mutant was selected with cefotaxime. The beta-lactamase from this C. diversus strain differed substantially in substrate profile from that of E. cloacae and C. freundii. In recent studies, a mechanism responsible for resistance diversus strains isolated during 1982 in the Clinical Microbi- of Enterobacter species to many beta-lactam antibiotics has ology Laboratories of the University of Washington Medical been characterized (4, 7, 8, 21).
    [Show full text]
  • Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets, USP)
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrNOVO–CEFUROXIME (Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets, USP) 125 mg, 250 mg and 500 mg cefuroxime/tablet Antibiotic Control Number: 031000 Novopharm Limited Date of Preparation: Toronto, Canada April 03, 2008 PrNOVO–CEFUROXIME (Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets, USP) 125 mg, 250 mg and 500 mg cefuroxime/tablet Antibiotic ACTIONS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Cefuroxime axetil is an orally active prodrug of cefuroxime. After oral administration, NOVO- CEFUROXIME (cefuroxime axetil) is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and rapidly hydrolyzed by nonspecific esterases in the intestinal mucosa and blood to release cefuroxime into the blood stream. Conversion to cefuroxime, the microbiologically active form, occurs rapidly. The inherent properties of cefuroxime are unaltered after its administration as cefuroxime axetil. Cefuroxime exerts its bactericidal effect by binding to an enzyme or enzymes referred to as penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis. This binding results in inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis and subsequent cell death. Specifically, cefuroxime shows high affinity for PBP 3, a primary target for cefuroxime in gram-negative organisms such as E. coli. A comparative, two-way, single-dose, fasting bioavailability study was performed on two 250 mg cefuroxime axetil products, NOVO-CEFUROXIME 250 mg tablets and Ceftin® 250 mg tablets. The pharmacokinetic data calculated for cefuroxime axetil in the NOVO- CEFUROXIME and Ceftin® tablet formulations is tabulated in Table 1. Table 1 Geometric Mean Arithmetic Mean (C.V.) Novo-Cefuroxime Ceftin®** Percentage of Ceftin® (2 x 250 mg) (2 x 250 mg) AUCT 15.65 16.44 (ng•hr/mL) 16.33 (28) 17.48 (36) 95 AUCI 16.36 17.12 (ng•hr/mL) 16.97 (27) 18.16 (35) 96 Cmax 5.39 5.50 (ng/mL) 5.63 (28) 5.76 (32) 98 Tmax* (hr) 1.33 (0.25) 1.74 (0.97) --- T1/2* (hr) 1.26 (0.20) 1.32 (0.19) --- *For the Tmax and T1/2 parameters these are the arithmetic means (standard deviation).
    [Show full text]
  • “CRE Mechanisms and Their Importance for Infection Prevention ” Paul C
    MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH June 25, 2015 “CRE Mechanisms and their Importance for Infection Prevention ” Paul C. Schreckenberger, Ph.D., D(ABMM), F(AAM) Professor of Pathology Director, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Loyola University Medical Center [email protected] Financial Disclosures Type of Financial Interest Name of Commercial Interest Salaried Employee Loyola University Medical Center Stocks/Stock Options None Independent Accelerate Dx., Beckman Coulter, contractor/Speaker’s bioMerieux, BioFire, Cepheid, Hardy Bureau Diagnostics, Merck, Thermo Fisher Scientific Consultant/Advisory BioFire, Cempra, Cepheid, GenMark, Committees Quidel, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Theravance Research Grants Accelerate Dx, Becton-Dickinson, Beckman Coulter, BioFire, bioMerieux, Bruker, Cepheid, Learning Objectives At the conclusion of this session, participants will be able to: 1.Describe the five major types of CRE 2.Review conventional and new approaches to detecting CRE 3.Explain the CSTE CRE definition proposal and its implications for labs 4.Evaluate their own laboratories readiness for detecting and reporting CRE 3 Penicillin nucleus S R 1 CH3 5 2 6 CH3 7 4 N 3 O COOH Cephalosporin nucleus 1 S 7 R1 C HN R O O 2 COOH4 13 MODE OF ACTION OF BETA LACTAMS IN GRAM NEGATIVES SUSCEPTIBLE RESISTANT - Lactam Antibiotic Diffusion through Porin Blocks Entry Outer Membrane Efflux Pump Diffusion through Beta-Lactamase Peptidoglycan Hydolyzes Beta-Lactam Penicillin Binding Proteins Changes in PBP results in Cell Death Failure to Bind
    [Show full text]
  • Beta-Lactam Allergy Tip Sheet
    Beta-lactam Allergy Tip Sheet Hypersensitivity Type, Mechanism, and Clinical Manifestations Penicillin allergy Facts • Approximately 10% of all U.S. patients report having an allergic reaction to a penicillin class antibiotic in their past. • However, many patients who report penicillin allergies do not have true IgE-mediated reactions. When evaluated, fewer than 1% of the population have IgE mediated hypersensitivities. • Approximately 80% of patients with IgE-mediated penicillin allergy lose their sensitivity after 10 years. • Broad-spectrum antibiotics are often used as an alternative to penicillins. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients labeled “penicillin-allergic” is associated with higher healthcare costs, increased risk for antibiotic resistance, and suboptimal antibiotic therapy. • Correctly identifying those who are not truly penicillin-allergic can decrease unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. • Reference: Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105(4):259-273. Beta-lactam Allergy Documentation • If a patient states they have a beta-lactam allergy, get a specific medication, reaction, and timing of reaction (immediate vs. delayed) DO NOT accept “penicillin” or “cephalosporin” as an allergy • Update allergy label with specific medications, reactions, and tolerances (i.e. “tolerates ceftriaxone”) Medical Liability Concerns • Fear of litigation has been identified as a potential reason clinicians avoid using β-lactams in a patient with a penicillin allergy. • Since 1959, 27 medical malpractice or negligence cases have been published in which a patient with a penicillin allergy received a β-lactam and experienced an adverse reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine – 5Th Revision. Geneva
    WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR) Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine 5th Revision 2016 Ranking of medically important antimicrobials for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non-human use Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine – 5th rev. ISBN 978-92-4-151222-0 © World Health Organization 2017, Updated in June 2017 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine – 5th rev. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenon of Resistance to Augmentin Associated With
    J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.36.6.670 on 1 June 1983. Downloaded from J Clin Pathol 1983;36:670-673 Phenomenon of resistance to Augmentin associated with sensitivity to ampicillin: occurrence and explanation W BRUMFITT, JMT HAMILTON-MILLER, SHIRLEY DIXSON, RA GARGAN, ANN GOODING From the Department ofMedical Microbiology, Royal Free Hospital and School ofMedicine, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG SUMMARY Ampicillin was found to be some tenfold more active than amoxycillin against Enterobacter cloacae. This finding explains the observation that some Ent cloacae strains are sensitive to ampicillin in the disc test but resistant to Augmentin. Ampicillin was also found to be more active than amoxycillin against Citrobacter freundii and Serratia marcescens. In view of these findings, the practice of using ampicillin discs to predict sensitivity to amoxycillin should be reconsidered. The use of both ampicillin and amoxycillin discs is appropriate if errors are to be avoided. Amoxycillin has been shown to be at least as active Material and methods in vitro as ampicillin against many pathogenic bac- copyright. terial with notable exceptions, such as Haemophilus ANTIBIOTICS influenzae. Its bactericidal action in vitro and its Ampicillin trihydrate and amoxycillin trihydrate effectiveness in vivo seems to be superior to that of were Laboratory Reference Standards nos 29 and ampicillin.23 Further, amoxycillin is absorbed by 12, respectively, from Beecham Research mouth almost twice as well as ampicillin.' Because Laboratories. Sodium ampicillin was obtained from of these properties, amoxycillin can be given in a the hospital pharmacy. Sodium amoxycillin and smaller dose and less frequently than ampicillin, and potassium clavulanate were generously supplied by http://jcp.bmj.com/ it now enjoys wide clinical use.
    [Show full text]
  • INVANZ, INN-Ertapenem
    SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS, LABELLING AND PACKAGE LEAFLET 1 SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 2 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINE {(Invented) name} 1 g powder for solution for injection/infusion 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each vial contains cefazolin sodium equivalent to 1 g cefazolin. Excipient(s) with known effect: Each vial of {(Invented) name} 1 g contains 50.56 mg (2.2 mmol) sodium. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Powder for solution for injection/infusion. White or almost white powder. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Cefazolin is indicated in adults, adolescents, children and infants older than one month for the treatment of the following infections caused by cefazolin-sensitive microorganisms: • skin and soft tissue infections • bone and joint infections Perioperative prophylaxis: Perioperative administration of cefazolin may reduce the incidence of postoperative infections in contaminated or potentially contaminated surgery. Susceptibility of causative organism to the treatment should be tested (if possible), although therapy may be initiated before the results are available. Consideration should be given to official guidance on the appropriate use of antibacterial agents. 4.2 Dosage and method of administration Dosage The dosage depends on the susceptibility of the micro-organisms and the severity of the disease. • Adults and adolescents (above 12 years of age and ≥ 40 kg bodyweight). In infections caused by very sensitive gram-positive micro-organisms the usual dosage in adults and adolescents is 1 to 2 g/day in two or three equal doses. • In infections caused by less sensitive gram-positive organisms and gram-negative organisms, the usual dosage is 3 to 4 g/day in three or four equal doses.
    [Show full text]