DOCSLIB.ORG

Adaptation of Unicellular Algae to Irradiance: an Analysis of Strategies by K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adaptation of Unicellular Algae to Irradiance: an Analysis of Strategies by K New PhytoL (19S3) 93, 157-191 157 ADAPTATION OF UNICELLULAR ALGAE TO IRRADIANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIES BY K. RICHARDSON, J. BEARDALL* AND J. A. RAVEN Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DDI 4HN, Scotland, U.K. (Accepted 1 October 1982) CONTENTS SUMMARY 157 INTRODUCTION 158 AN.^LYTICAL METHODS 159 LIGHT HARVESTING BY MICROALGAE 160 RANGE OF PHOTON FLUX DENSITIES ALLOWING GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN PHOTOTHOPHIC MICROALGAE (GENOTYPIC ADAPTATION) 163 Growth 163 Photosynthesis 165 Photoinhibition 165 PHENOTYPIC ADAPTATION 168 Changes in amounts of pigments 168 Interpretation of the effects of pigment changes: models 169 Observed changes in P vs I curves 170 ENERGETIC CONSIDERATIONS 174 General 174 Reduction of capital costs 175 Reduction of maintenance costs 175 Energetic costs of changing the photosyothetic apparatus 177 S2-S3 decay 177 Proton leakage due to passive uniport 178 PHYLOGENETIC ASPECTS OF DIFFERENCES IN LIGHT RESPONSES OF MICROALGAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND PHOTOLITHOTROPHIC GROWTH 178 Phylogenetic diflerences in photosynthetic structures 178 Comparison of tbe photosynthetic characteristics of green algae and other pbototrophs 180 ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS 182 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 185 REFERENCES 185 SUMMARY Analysis of data in the literature relating to micrcalgal adaptations to different photon flux densities indicates that different algal classes have significantly different ligbt requirennents for growth and photosynthesis. Although there is some variability within each class, dinoflagellates and blue-green algae generally photosynthesize and grow best at low photon flux densities. Diatoms also tend to be able to grow at very low photon flux densities (growth for some species has been reported at less than 1 fi.E m"' s~'). Comparison of the photon flux densities at which photoinhibition occurs in dinoflagellates and diatoms suggests that the former often experience photoinhibition at comparatively low irradiances. In contrast, diatoms often can tolerate relatively high light environments. This tolerance of a large absolute range of photon flux densities may, in part, explain why diatoms are often associated with spring blooms. Green algae * New address; Department of Botany, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083 Australia. 0028-646X/83/020157 + 35 S03.00/0 © 1983 The New Phytologist 6 ANj" 93 158 K. RICHARDSON eZ a/. tend to exhibit higher light compensation points than the other common microalgal classes and can tolerate very high light environments. The photosynthesis vs irradiance curves of high and low light adapted microalgae are discussed in relation to the theoretical models that other workers have put forward to describe phytoplankton photoadaptation as a function of either an increased number or an increase in the size of photosynthetic units in a cell. We conclude that while the models form a useful starting point for the study of photoadaptation, they cannot explain all of the strategies observed. Microalgal photoadaptation is discussed in terms of the possible mechanisms by which a cell could reduce its capital and maintenance costs under conditions of limiting energy supply. Phylogenetic aspects of the differences in light responses of tbe various microalgal classes and the ecological implications of different photoadaptive strategies are also considered. INTRODUCTION By comparison with most vascular plants, unicellular microalgae occupy habitats characterized by very low photon flux densities. Most microalgae live in aquatic environments where light is attenuated exponentially with depth according to the Lambert-Beer Law: where d is depth, !„ is the incident radiation upon the surface of the vifater, I^ is the photon flux density at depth, d, and k is an extinction coefficient. Typically, clear temperate coastal waters exhibit a k for photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), 400 to 700 nm of about 0-15 while in the clearest oceanic waters k may be in the region of 0"04. In addition to attenuating light, water selectively filters the light passing through it and although the quality of light penetrating to depth varies in different water types, in all types red light (> 600 nm) is essentially undetectable at depths of 10 m or more. (For detailed discussions of light and the underwater environment, see Jerlov, 1968, 1976; Wheeler and Neushal, 1981). The ability of microalgae to survive and grow in habitats where they nnay experience exposure to very low photon flux densities must result from the interaction of structural, behavioural, physiological and biochemical factors. Unlike macroscopic algae and vascular plants, unicellular phytoplankton do not have large amounts of non-photosynthetic tissue to support. This structural difference between unicellular algae and higher plants tnust certainly make the former more suited to life at low photon fiux densities. Furthermore, although most macroscopic algae and vascular plants occupy a fixed topographic position and in order to survive must be able to tolerate all environmental extremes that that position experiences, some phytoplankton are able, at least to some extent, to regulate their position in the water column. This tneans that some species may be able to exert some control over their light environment as well. Microalgae are better suited for the study of photoadaptive strategies than macrophytes because the latter can adapt morphologically to changes in the light environment and, therefore, may be less reliant on cell-level changes than unicells. Also, terrestial macrophytes have more extreme thermo/water regulation prob- lems in 'sun' than in 'shade' environments. Thus, photoadaptive strategies may be difficult to differentiate from temperature or dessication responses. To date, a large number of physiological and biochemical investigations have been carried out on the problem of the relationship between irradiance and algal growth and photosynthesis. Adaptation of unicellular algae 159 Most such studies of phytoplankton photoadaptation have examined responses of an individual species confronted with a change in its light environment. By analogy with vascular plants, investigators have attempted to differentiate between ' sun' and ' shade' species. Although a number of different adaptive strategies have been described, no clear overall picture of phytoplankton adaptations to changes in photon flux density has, as yet, emerged. The problems associated with analysis of light adaptation in microalgae are considerable. In the field, natural water movements make description of a phytoplankter's light environment and light history very difficult. In the laboratory, description of the light environment is possible. However, results of investigations may be affected by changes in algal physiological state precipitated by the culturing conditions employed (see Griffiths, 1973; Morris and Glover, 1974; Beardall and Morris, 1976). Furthermore, laboratory cultures are normally maintained at greater cell densities than would normally be encountered in nature. Failure to consider the extent to which algal suspensions absorb incident light complicates the analysis of photosynthesis vs photon flux density (P vs I) and grovi^th rate vs photon flux density (p, vs I) curves. Finally, problems surrounding the measurement of light have complicated the algal physiologist's understanding of light adaptation by phytoplankton. In recent years, the convention of describing the light environment in units of illumination (lux, footcandles) has gradually been replaced by expressing light either in units of energy (joules, ergs, gram calories) or in quanta (Einsteins). As photosynthesis at its most basic level is controlled by the absorption of photons, the expression of light in quanta (einsteins) would seem particularly suited to investigations into phytoplankton photoadaptation. Knowledge of the spectral distribution of the quanta received then allows calculation of the energy input. Conversion between units can be complicated and owing to differences in the nature of the measurements is, at best, imprecise when converting between units of illumination and energy or quanta. Analysis of the available literature reveals that many investigators (and reviewers) remain confused about the units in use and what is actually being measured. (For discussion, see Incoll, Long and Ashmore, 1981.) Many appear to lack a feeling for 'reasonable' values and some quite unrealistic light measurement values have found their way into print. We believe that further understanding of light/shade adaptation by phytoplank- ton cannot be achieved until a synthesis of the available data pertaining to microalgal light adaptations has been made. Therefore,, the present work is an attempt to collate and analyse the literature relating to phytoplankton light adaptation. By doing so we hope to clarify the present understanding of photo- adaptation by phytoplankton and to identify the questions which should be asked in further research. ANALYTICAL METHODS Data pertaining to algal growth and photosynthesis at differing photon flux densities were compiled from the published literature and from personal com- munications. All values for light measurement were converted to /lE m~^ s''- according to the conversions shown below.* In these units, 'full sunlight' has a photon flux density of about 1700 fcE m~^ s'^ (400' to 700 nm). When cultures were • 2Wm-= = 10/(Em-'s-'; 1 klx = 16-5/tE m"'s"'; 1 ly min"'= 4-184 J cm^'min"i; 1 ly min-'= 697 W m-"; ] ly min"' = 3485 /iB
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Physiology General the Main Light Sensitive Pigment Able to Absorb Solar Energy in Both Plants and Algae Is
    Plant Physiology General the main light sensitive pigment able to absorb solar energy in both plants and algae is chlorophyll Photosynthesis this chlorophyll is contained with the chloroplasts probably the most characteristic “thing” that plants plants also have other “accessory pigments”: “do” is photosynthesis carotenoids – mainly yellow, orange almost all plants are autotrophs but usually their colors are masked by an abundance of !use energy from the sun to make sugar and chlorophyll other organic molecules out of simple fall colors are seen as a deciduous plant shuts down nutrients and chlorophyll is broken down and recycled leaving the colors of the other pigments photosynthesis requires carbon dioxide & water reds come from anthocyanins made to protect leaves as they recycle nutrients from the breakdown of chlorophyll CO2 enters through stomata or pores [Application] water is absorbed through roots researchers are studying the structure of the chloroplasts to light improve efficiency in the design of solar collectors CO2 + H2O sugar + O2 chlorophyll (glucose) today (2006) the most efficient solar cells capture only ~17% of solar energy that lands on them, while plant [photosynthesis converts water and carbon dioxide cell capture 30-40% to sugar and oxygen] !these sugars can then be broken down as needed for energy photosynthesis uses several chemical pigment to absorb the energy from sunlight Plants: Plant Physiology - General, Ziser, Lecture Notes, 2012.10 1 Plants: Plant Physiology - General, Ziser, Lecture Notes, 2012.10 2 Plant
    [Show full text]
  • BIL 161: Environment and Development: the Effects of Environmental Variables on Seed Germination
    BIL 161: Environment and Development: The Effects of Environmental Variables on Seed Germination The seed is more than just a plant waiting to happen. It is a complex marvel of evolution, a miniature life-support system that responds to environmental cues in order to give the embryo nestled within the best chance of survival. I. Characteristics and Classification of Plants Plants share synapomorphies that set them apart from other organisms. 1. true tissues (of types unique to plants) 2. waxy cuticle (to prevent desiccation) 3. stomates (microscopic gas exchange pores on the leaves) 4. apical meristems (permanent embryonic tissue for constant growth) 5. multicellular sex organs (male antheridia and female archegonia) 6. walled spores produced in structures called sporangia 7. embryo development inside the female parent 8. secondary metabolites (alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, etc.) 9. heteromorphic alternation of generations The most primitive plants do not produce seeds at all, but rather release spores into the environment where they grow into a second life cycle stage, called the gametophyte. In seed plants, the life cycle is highly derived. Seed plants still make spores, but each spore grows into a gametophyte that is little more than a bit of tissue that gives rise to gametes. In the male parts of the plant, each spore develops into a sperm-producing male gametophyte known as pollen. In the female parts of the plant, meiosis occurs inside a structure known as the ovule, which will eventually give rise to the seed. Plants can broadly be classified as follows. A. Bryophytes – non-vascular plants (mosses, liverworts and hornworts) B.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Physiology
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY Vince Ördög Created by XMLmind XSL-FO Converter. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY Vince Ördög Publication date 2011 Created by XMLmind XSL-FO Converter. Table of Contents Cover .................................................................................................................................................. v 1. Preface ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Water and nutrients in plant ............................................................................................................ 2 1. Water balance of plant .......................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Water potential ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Absorption by roots .................................................................................................. 6 1.3. Transport through the xylem .................................................................................... 8 1.4. Transpiration ............................................................................................................. 9 1.5. Plant water status .................................................................................................... 11 1.6. Influence of extreme water supply .......................................................................... 12 2. Nutrient supply of plant .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come?
    Microorganisms 2013, 1, 3-25; doi:10.3390/microorganisms1010003 OPEN ACCESS microorganisms ISSN 2076-2607 www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms Review Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come? Martha Valiadi 1,* and Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez 2 1 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Strasse, Plӧn 24306, Germany 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +49-4522-763277; Fax: +49-4522-763310. Received: 3 May 2013; in revised form: 20 August 2013 / Accepted: 24 August 2013 / Published: 5 September 2013 Abstract: Some dinoflagellates possess the remarkable genetic, biochemical, and cellular machinery to produce bioluminescence. Bioluminescent species appear to be ubiquitous in surface waters globally and include numerous cosmopolitan and harmful taxa. Nevertheless, bioluminescence remains an enigmatic topic in biology, particularly with regard to the organisms’ lifestyle. In this paper, we review the literature on the cellular mechanisms, molecular evolution, diversity, and ecology of bioluminescence in dinoflagellates, highlighting significant discoveries of the last quarter of a century. We identify significant gaps in our knowledge and conflicting information and propose some important research questions
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study on the Affinities for Inorganic Carbon Uptake, Nitrate and Phosphate Between Marine Diatoms and Dinoflagellates
    A comparative study on the affinities for inorganic carbon uptake, nitrate and phosphate between marine diatoms and dinoflagellates Mr. T. (Thomas) Hofman - 11066938 Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) Supervised by: mw. dr. J.H.M. Verspagen Abstract: Eutrophication and increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are water quality concerns threatening our drinking water and food supply due to a rise in harmful cyanobacterial and harmful algal blooms. Understanding which factors determine the species distribution of phytoplankton could help to prevent the increase of these blooms in the future. Growth is thought to be limited by the scarcest resource available. As eutrophic waters are, by definition, rich in macronutrients such as nitrate and phosphate, inorganic carbon limitation becomes more significant in population dynamics as a limiting factor. Moreover, due to increased growth rates in eutrophied oceans, inorganic carbon depletes faster. An in silico literature research on the the affinity for phosphate, nitrate and inorganic carbon in marine diatom and dinoflagellate species gave insights in species distribution, based on in vivo uptake kinetics, field measurements and uptake mechanisms of both taxonomic groups. The affinity for nitrate and inorganic carbon was significantly higher dinoflagellates. This difference could explain the species composition in marine environments. According to findings in this research, dinoflagellates are better adapted, based on their affinity for nutrients and inorganic carbon, to oligotrophic and Ci depleted environments. 1. Introduction Phytoplankton blooms can severely decrease water quality, threatening drinking water and food supply. Anthropogenic increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations and nutrient enrichment alter hydrological patterns and strongly influence the duration, frequency and intensity of harmful cyanobacterial blooms (HCB’s) (Visser et al, 2016) and harmful algal blooms (HAB’s) (Smith and Schindler, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Novel and Rapidly Diverging Intergenic Sequences Between Tandem Repeats of the Luciferase Genes in Seven Dinoflagellate Species1
    J. Phycol. 42, 96–103 (2005) r 2005 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00165.x NOVEL AND RAPIDLY DIVERGING INTERGENIC SEQUENCES BETWEEN TANDEM REPEATS OF THE LUCIFERASE GENES IN SEVEN DINOFLAGELLATE SPECIES1 Liyun Liu and J. Woodland Hastings2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Tandemly arranged luciferase genes were previ- Our previous studies of the structure of dinoflagel- ously reported in two dinoflagellates species, but lates genes and their circadian regulation revealed that their intergenic regions were strikingly different several occur in tandemly arranged copies (Le et al. and no canonical promoter sequences were found. 1997, Li and Hastings 1998, Okamoto et al. 2001). Here, we examined the intergenic regions of the Other than for ribosomal genes (Sollner-Webb and luciferase genes of five other dinoflagellate species Tower 1986) and a few protein-coding genes in two along with those of the earlier two. In all cases, the protozoa, Trypanosoma brucei and Babesia bovis (Lee and genes exist in multiple copies and are arranged Van der Ploeg 1997, Suarez et al. 1998), such an ar- tandemly, coding for proteins of similar sizes and rangement is not known in other eukaryotes. Indeed, sequences. However, the 50 untranslated region, 30 it is well known that the dinoflagellate nucleus is very untranslated region, and intergenic regions of the unusual; its envelope remains intact throughout the seven genes differ greatly in length and sequence, cell cycle, with the separation of the chromosomes in except for two stretches that are conserved in the mitosis being carried out by an external mitotic spindle intergenic regions of two pairs of phylogenetically (Taylor 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Stress-Induced Dinoflagellate Bioluminescence at the Single Cell Level
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 125, 028102 (2020) Editors' Suggestion Featured in Physics Stress-Induced Dinoflagellate Bioluminescence at the Single Cell Level Maziyar Jalaal ,1 Nico Schramma ,1,2 Antoine Dode ,1,3 H´el`ene de Maleprade ,1 Christophe Raufaste ,1,4 and Raymond E. Goldstein 1,* 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom 2Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 3LadHyX, UMR 7646 du CNRS, École polytechnique, 91120 Palaiseau, France 4Universit´e Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Institut de Physique de Nice, CNRS, 06100 Nice, France (Received 18 March 2020; accepted 26 May 2020; published 6 July 2020) One of the characteristic features of many marine dinoflagellates is their bioluminescence, which lights up nighttime breaking waves or seawater sliced by a ship’s prow. While the internal biochemistry of light production by these microorganisms is well established, the manner by which fluid shear or mechanical forces trigger bioluminescence is still poorly understood. We report controlled measurements of the relation between mechanical stress and light production at the single cell level, using high-speed imaging of micropipette-held cells of the marine dinoflagellate Pyrocystis lunula subjected to localized fluid flows or direct indentation. We find a viscoelastic response in which light intensity depends on both the amplitude and rate of deformation, consistent with the action of stretch-activated ion channels. A phenomenological
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
    BSCBO- 303 B.Sc. III YEAR Plant Physiology and Biochemistry DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY BSCBO-303 Expert Committee Prof. J. C. Ghildiyal Prof. G.S. Rajwar Retired Principal Principal Government PG College Government PG College Karnprayag Augustmuni Prof. Lalit Tewari Dr. Hemant Kandpal Department of Botany School of Health Science DSB Campus, Uttarakhand Open University Kumaun University, Nainital Haldwani Dr. Pooja Juyal Department of Botany School of Sciences Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani Board of Studies Prof. Y. S. Rawat Prof. C.M. Sharma Department of Botany Department of Botany DSB Campus, Kumoun University HNB Garhwal Central University, Nainital Srinagar Prof. R.C. Dubey Prof. P.D.Pant Head, Department of Botany Director I/C, School of Sciences Gurukul Kangri University Uttarakhand Open University Haridwar Haldwani Dr. Pooja Juyal Department of Botany School of Sciences Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani Programme Coordinator Dr. Pooja Juyal Department of Botany School of Sciences Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Nainital UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Page 1 PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY BSCBO-303 Unit Written By: Unit No. 1. Dr. Urmila Rana 1 & 2 Asst. Professor, Department of Botany, Pauri Campus, H.N.B. Garhwal University, Pauri, Uttarakhand 2. Dr. Shweta Kukreti 3 Asst. Professor, Department of Botany, Pauri Campus, H.N.B. Garhwal University, Pauri, Uttarakhand 3- Dr. Nishesh Sharma 4 Asst. Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Uttaranchal College of Applied and Life Science Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 4. Dr. Deepika Upadhyay 5 & 6 Asst. Professor, Department of Microbiology Chinmaya Degree College, BHEL, Haridwar 5- Dr. Manish Belwal 7 & 8 Asst Prof., Department of Botany Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Plant Physiology
    Chapter 1: Introduction to Plant Physiology Plant is source of food, fodder, fibers, clothing, shelter fuel, medicine, and oxygen. This all resources are the products of plant physiology. The basic and main process in plant, photosynthesis is responsible for the supply of all the above-mentioned resources. Figure 1: Different plant science areas studied under plant physiology. Definition: Plant physiology deals with the various metabolic process and pathways in plant. Practically it is heart of the botany, which study different functions performed by the plant. It deals with the study of organization and operation of all the physiological, biochemical and enzymological processes in plant. Importance of plant physiology: Plant metabolism is mainly anabolism and catabolism. Breaking and joining different biomolecules. Studying this aspect of plant provides the explanation the several question about the plant. Example: How plants utilize solar energy? SACP Dept. of Botany BO232 Plant Physiology How they obtain and distribute water and nutrients? How plants grow and develop? How they respond to the environment? How they produce flowers and seed? How seed germinate and form new plants? Answers of above questions helps to understand different process and acquired knowledge helps to improve productivity and yield of the crop. Need for the Study of Plant Physiology: • It is important branch of botany, understanding the plant physiology helps interlink other branches of botany. Understanding different physiological process such as Seed germination, Growth and development, Photosynthesis, Absorption of water and minerals, Ascent of sap, Translocation of solutes, Transpiration, Photorespiration, Respiration, Photoperiodism, Vernalization, Flowering, Ripening of fruits, Senescence and Death of plant gives huge knowledge and this knowledge finds wide application in every branch of botany.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 247 Species Composition And
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 247 SPECIES COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE OF LAGOON ZOOPLANKTON AT ENIWETAK ATOLL, MARSHALL ISLANDS by Ray P. Gerber Issued by THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Washington, D. C., U.S.A. July 1981 ENEWETAK ATOLL MARSHALL ISLANDS LAGOON STATION 2 8 PASS \ DEEP CHANNEL ENEWETAK ISLAND - 0 10 SOUTH PASS -~rn (WIDE CHANNEL) Figure 1. Enewetak Atoll, with sampling stations (1) and (2) indicated SPECIES COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE OF LAGOON ZOOPLANKTON AT ENIWETAK ATOLL, MARSHALL ISLANDS by Ray P. Gerberl ABSTRACT The species composition and abundance of lagoon zooplankton were studied from net tows made during two winters (January-February, 1972; 1974) and one summer (June-August, 1974) at a mid-lagoon station, and during the winter of 1972 at a shallow back-reef area. About 124 zooplanktonic organisms were identified, which included many species not previously reported from this lagoon. Copepods, chaetognaths and larvaceans which dominated at the mid- lagoon station were much lower in abundance at the shallow station. At the mid-lagoon station about 56 of the more abundant species increased in abundance during the summer, while 3 species were collected only in the summer; 4 species increased in abundance during the winter, while about 4 species were collected only in the winter; and about 30 species lacked a seasonal preference. The species diversity (Shannon-Wiener and Brillouin indices) of the lagoon zooplankton, which ranged from about 3.8 to 3.9, was not significantly different for the winter and summer populations. hisl lack of a difference in diversity may be due to certain limitations inherent in such indices when used to describe complex communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanic Phytoplankton Communities
    Biogeosciences Discuss., 3, 607–663, 2006 Biogeosciences www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/3/607/2006/ Discussions BGD © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed 3, 607–663, 2006 under a Creative Commons License. Biogeosciences Discussions is the access reviewed discussion forum of Biogeosciences Oceanic phytoplankton communities E. Litchman et al. Multi-nutrient, multi-group model of Title Page present and future oceanic phytoplankton Abstract Introduction communities Conclusions References E. Litchman1,2, C. A. Klausmeier2,3, J. R. Miller1, O. M. Schofield1, and Tables Figures P. G. Falkowski1 J I 1Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA 2 Michigan State University, Kellogg Biological Station, MI 49060, USA J I 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, Back Close USA Received: 16 January 2006 – Accepted: 20 January 2006 – Published: 19 June 2006 Full Screen / Esc Correspondence to: E. Litchman ([email protected]) Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion EGU 607 Abstract BGD Phytoplankton community composition profoundly influences patterns of nutrient cy- cling and the structure of marine food webs; therefore predicting present and future 3, 607–663, 2006 phytoplankton community structure is of fundamental importance to understanding how 5 ocean ecosystems are influenced by physical forcing and nutrient limitations. In this pa- Oceanic per, we develop a mechanistic model of phytoplankton communities that includes multi- phytoplankton ple taxonomic groups, test the model at two contrasting sites in the modern ocean, and communities then use the model to predict community reorganization under different global change scenarios. The model includes three phytoplankton functional groups (diatoms, coccol- E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BOTANY, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION Segment One – Nutrient Listing Plants Need 17 Elements
    BOTANY, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION Segment One – Nutrient Listing Plants need 17 elements for normal growth. Carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen are found in air and water. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and sulfur are found in the soil. The above nine elements are used in relatively large amounts by the plant and are called macronutrients. There are eight other elements that are used in much smaller amounts and are called micronutrients or trace elements. The micronutrients, which are found in the soil, are listed in the table below. All 17 elements, both macronutrients and micronutrients, are essential for plant growth. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen O hydrogen H Primary Elements nitrogen N phosphorus P potassium K Secondary Elements calcium Ca magnesium Mg sulfur S MICRONUTRIENTS iron Fe manganese Mn copper Cu zinc Zn boron B molybdenum Mo chlorine Cl cobalt Co The terms primary, secondary, and micronutrients actually refer to the amount of these elements needed by the plants rather than their relative importance. All 17 elements are essential; this is an important concept when learning plant nutrition. The term “essential” means if even ONE nutrient is missing, you have a critical situation. The plant will stop growing, and will die eventually. Think of all 17 elements as a chain of 17 links; if you lose one link in the chain, it has no power. 1 Seldom do you need to be concerned about the supply of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen, even though large amounts of each are used in plant growth and development.
    [Show full text]