LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, and TRANSGENDER (LGBT) 2015 Wow! Facts 13Th Edition LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, and TRANSGENDER (LGBT)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, and TRANSGENDER (LGBT) 2015 Wow! Facts 13Th Edition LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, and TRANSGENDER (LGBT) LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER (LGBT) 2015 wOW! FACTs 13th Edition LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER (LGBT) Editor’s Note: Statistics in this section are based on those who have self-iden- tified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. Because this is a population based on self-identification, research data in some categories is not available. Demographics Population Table 1: People Self-Identifying as LGBT in Four National Surveys (Percentage of U.S. Population)1 LGBT LGBT National Survey Age 18 & Older Age 18-44 National Survey of Family Growth, 2006–2010 Not Included 4.1 % General Social Survey, 2008, 2010, 2012 3.0 % 4.2 % National Health Interview Survey, 2014 2.2 % 2.8 % Gallup Daily Tracking Survey, 2014 4.0 % 5.6 % (The Williams Institute) 1 Discrimination remains a serious issue for the community due to anti-LGBT attitudes. Consequently, some respondents to surveys that ask for informa- tion on sexual orientation or gender identification are reluctant to respond truthfully. This hesitancy makes it difficult to estimate the size of the LGBT population accurately. • Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identifies as gay, lesbian, or bisexual. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) 1 The Williams Institute is a national think tank at UCLA Law that conducts research on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy. The chart compares the findings of “four large, national, population based surveys,” regarding the number of U.S. individuals who are LGBT. diversitybestpractices.com | 111 • Approximately 1.6 percent of adults self-identify as gay or lesbian and 0.7 percent as bisexual. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) • A substantial majority of adults — 96.6 percent — said they were het- erosexual in a 2013 survey. An additional 1.1 percent responded, “I don’t know the answer”, or said they were “something else.”2 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Table 2: Gay/Lesbian and Bisexual Americans in Four National Surveys (Percentage of U.S. Population)3 National Survey Gay/Lesbian Bisexual Age 18 Age Age 18 Age & Older 18-44 & Older 18-44 National Survey of Family Growth, Not Not 1.5 % 2.6 % 2006–2010 Included Included General Social Survey, 1.4 % 1.7 % 1.6 % 2.5 % 2008, 2010, 2012 National Health Interview Survey, 1.6 % 1.7 % 0.6 % 1.0 % 2014 Gallup Daily Tracking Survey, Not Not Not Not 2014 Included Included Included Included (The Williams Institute) • There are three main commonalities among individuals who identify as LGBT4: • A greater percentage of younger people identify as LGBT than older generations. • A greater percentage of LGBT adults are Black, Latino, or some other racial or ethnic minority when compared to the non-LGBT adult population. • A greater percentage of LGBT adults are located in the Northeast and West than in the South and Midwest.5 (The Williams Institute) • Twenty percent of Americans are attracted to members of the same sex.6 (National Bureau of Economic Research) • Neither the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor the U.S. Census Bureau include transgender persons in their estimates. Gender identity and sexual orientation are two very different human characteris- tics. (Human Rights Campaign) • “Transgender” is independent of sexual orientation and describes indi- viduals whose gender identity (the sense of gender that every person feels inside) and/or gender expression (their behavior, clothing, haircut, voice, and body characteristics) is different from the sex assigned to them at birth. 112 | diversitybestpractices.com At some point in their lives, many transgender people decide they must live their lives as the gender they have always known themselves to be, and often transition to living as that gender.7 (Human Rights Campaign) • Estimating the number of transgender persons in the population is even more challenging than determining the size of the lesbian, gay, and bisexual communities. Many transgender people are afraid to self-identify and a large percentage are homeless. (Human Rights Campaign) • Forty-one percent of Black and 27 percent of Latina and Latino transgen- der and gender nonconforming respondents experienced homelessness at some point in their lives. (Human Rights Campaign) • Moreover, 40 percent of Black respondents and 45 percent of Latina and Latino respondents reported that they were denied access to shelters.8 (Human Rights Campaign) • It is estimated that there are 700,000 people in the transgender commu- nity, or .03 percent of the nation’s population.9 (The Williams Institute) Population and Geographic Distribution • The state with the largest percentage of people identifying as LGBT is Hawaii with 5.1 percent. However, the Hawaii figure is only half the percentage of Washington D.C., where 10 percent of its residents say they are LGBT10. (Nationwide Count) • North Dakota is the state with the lowest percentage, 1.7 percent.11 Tables 3 and 4 provide a sense of the geographical distribution of the LGBT community in the United States. (Nationwide Count) • Table 3 lists the 10 states and metropolitan areas with the highest percent- age of people self-identifying as LGBT. (Gallup and The New York Times) • Table 4 lists the 10 states and metropolitan areas with the lowest percent- age of people self-identifying as LGBT. The metropolitan area data comes from a ranking of nation’s 50 largest metro areas. (Gallup) Table 3: States12 and Metro Areas13 with the Highest Percentage of LGBT Americans Top 10 Top 10 # States % Metro Areas % 1 Hawaii 5.1% San Francisco 6.2% 2 Vermont 4.9% Portland, Oregon 5.4% 3 Oregon 4.9% Austin, Texas 5.3% 4 Maine 4.8% New Orleans 5.1% 5 Rhode Island 4.5% Seattle 4.8% 6 Massachusetts 4.4% Boston 4.8% diversitybestpractices.com | 113 7 South Dakota 4.4% Salt Lake City 4.7% 8 Nevada 4.2% Los Angeles 4.6% 9 California 4.0% Denver 4.6% 10 Washington 4.0% Hartford 4.6% Table 4: States14 and Metro Areas15 with the Lowest Percentage of LGBT Americans Top 10 Top 10 # States % Metro Areas % 50 West Virginia 3.1% Birmingham, Alabama 2.6% 49 Colorado 3.2% Pittsburgh 3.0% 48 Louisiana 3.2% Memphis 3.1% 47 Texas 3.3% Cincinnati 3.2% 46 North Carolina 3.3% Raleigh, North Carolina 3.2% 45 Missouri 3.3% San Jose, Calif. 3.2% 44 Maryland 3.3% Houston 3.3% 43 Alaska 3.4% Milwaukee 3.5% 42 Oklahoma 3.4% Nashville. 3.5% 41 Delaware 3.4% Richmond, Va. 3.5% Household • Approximately, 1,980,000 LGBT persons live with their partners as couples in households, and 780,000 of them are legally married. (The number of legally married couples tripled in 2014.) There are 390,000 same-sex married couples in the United States and 600,000 same-sex domestic partnerships. (Gallup) • As of May 2015, same-sex marriage was legal in 37 states and the District of Columbia.16 (Gallup) • Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender parents are raising two million children throughout the United States. Ninety-six percent of the U.S. counties have same-sex parents raising children.17 (National Journal) • Four percent (65,000) of the 1.6 million adopted children in the United States are growing up in a same-sex household. (National Journal) • Same-sex couples are responsible for 14,000 foster children or 3 percent of all foster children. (National Journal) • Approximately, 59 percent of same-sex parents are White, which is 14 per- centage points lower than the percentage of White, married heterosexual parents (73 percent). (National Journal) 114 | diversitybestpractices.com • Same-sex families are more ethnically and racially diverse than families headed by married heterosexual couples.18 (National Journal) • Many same-sex couples without children want to raise them, includ- ing almost two-thirds of lesbians, three-quarters of bisexual women, 57 percent of gay men, and 70 percent of bisexual men.19 (Movement Advancement Project) • The perception that LGBT people have higher incomes that non-LGBT is false when it comes to LGBT couples raising children. (Movement Advancement Project) • Same-sex couples raising children have lower incomes than heterosexual couples raising children. The average household income for same-sex couples raising children is $15,500, or 20 percent less than the average household incomes headed by heterosexual couples raising children. (Movement Advancement Project) • Children in same-sex households are twice as likely to live in poverty as households headed by heterosexual, married couples. (Movement Advancement Project) • While 9 percent of married different-sex couples with children live in poverty, 21 percent of male same-sex couples and 20 percent of female same-sex couples do. (Movement Advancement Project) • Black children living in same-sex households formed by Black men have a higher poverty rate (52.3 percent) than that of any other children in any other household type. There is also a disparity in house ownership.20 (Movement Advancement Project) • Although 71 percent of heterosexual couples with children own their homes, only 51 percent of same-sex parents do.21 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) • LGBT people living alone are more likely to have incomes below $12,000 than non-LGBT persons in the same situation. The $12,000 figure approximates the poverty guideline for one-person households released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in January 2015. People in one-person households with annual incomes less than $11,770 are said to be living in poverty.22 (The Williams Institute) diversitybestpractices.com | 115 Table 5: Percent of LGBT and Non-LGBT Persons in One-Person Households Living in Poverty23 Annual Income Non-LGBT LGBT Non-LGBT LGBT Below $12,000 Males Males Women Women All 13.4% 20.1% 19.1% 21.5% Less Than Age 65 16.6% 22.4% 21.3% 27.3% Age 65 and Older 9.7% 15.9% 17.7% 15.1 (National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Taskforce) • Transgender household incomes are well below the national averages, with 15 percent making less than $1,000.
Recommended publications
  • Glaadawards March 16, 2013 New York New York Marriott Marquis
    #glaadawards MARCH 16, 2013 NEW YORK NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS APRIL 20, 2013 LOS AnGELES JW MARRIOTT LOS AnGELES MAY 11, 2013 SAN FRANCISCO HILTON SAN FRANCISCO - UnION SQUARE CONNECT WITH US CORPORATE PARTNERS PRESIDENT’S LETTer NOMINEE SELECTION PROCESS speCIAL HONOrees NOMINees SUPPORT FROM THE PRESIDENT Welcome to the 24th Annual GLAAD Media Awards. Thank you for joining us to celebrate fair, accurate and inclusive representations of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in the media. Tonight, as we recognize outstanding achievements and bold visions, we also take pause to remember the impact of our most powerful tool: our voice. The past year in news, entertainment and online media reminds us that our stories are what continue to drive equality forward. When four states brought marriage equality to the election FROM THE PRESIDENT ballot last year, GLAAD stepped forward to help couples across the nation to share messages of love and commitment that lit the way for landmark victories in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington. Now, the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh in on whether same- sex couples should receive the same federal protections as straight married couples, and GLAAD is leading the media narrative and reshaping the way Americans view marriage equality. Because of GLAAD’s work, the Boy Scouts of America is closer than ever before to ending its discriminatory ban on gay scouts and leaders. GLAAD is empowering people like Jennifer Tyrrell – an Ohio mom who was ousted as leader of her son’s Cub Scouts pack – to share their stories with top-tier national news outlets, helping Americans understand the harm this ban inflicts on gay youth and families.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Review: American Gay Rights Movement Directions and Obje
    Name:_____________________________________ Class Period:______ Thematic Review: American Gay Rights Movement Although the topic of homosexuality continues to ignite passionate debate and is often omitted from history discussions due to the sensitivity of the topic, it is important to consider gays and lesbians when defining and analyzing modern American identity. The purpose of this activity is to review the struggle for respect, dignity, and equal protection under the law that so many have fought for throughout American history. Racial minorities… from slaves fighting for freedom to immigrants battling for opportunity… to modern-day racial and ethnic minorities working to overcome previous and current inequities in the American system. Women… fighting for property rights, education, suffrage, divorce, and birth control. Non- Protestants… from Catholics, Mormons, and Jews battling discrimination to modern day Muslims and others seeking peaceful co-existence in this “land of the free.” Where do gays and lesbians fit in? Once marginalized as criminals and/or mentally ill, they are increasingly being included in the “fabric” we call America. From the Period 8 Content Outline: Stirred by a growing awareness of inequalities in American society and by the African American civil rights movement, activists also addressed issues of identity and social justice, such as gender/sexuality and ethnicity. Activists began to question society’s assumptions about gender and to call for social and economic equality for women and for gays and lesbians. Directions and Objectives: Review the events in the Gay Rights Thematic Review Timeline, analyze changes in American identity, and make connections to other historically significant events occurring along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Open-And-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public Marjorie Cohn
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 51 | Issue 2 Article 3 1-2000 Open-and-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public Marjorie Cohn Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Marjorie Cohn, Open-and-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public, 51 Hastings L.J. 365 (2000). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol51/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Open-and-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public by MARJORIE COHN* Table of Contents I. Impeachment Rules and Precedents ................................................ 368 A. Current Impeachment Rules ............................................... 368 B. A Tradition of Senate Secrecy ............................................ 370 (1) Congressional Rule-Making Authority ........................ 370 (2) The "Closed-Door Policy"............................................. 370 (3) The Twentieth Century: The Door Opens Wider ...... 374 (4) When the Doors Are Closed ......................................... 376 C. Historical Impeachment Rules ............................................ 377 D. Why Did the Presumption of Openness Change in .. 1868 with the Andrew Johnson Impeachment?
    [Show full text]
  • How Taking School Demographics Into Account in College Admissions
    YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW Shifting the Scope: How Taking School Demographics Into Account in College Admissions Could Reduce K-12 Segregation Nationwide by Thomas Scott-Railton* Deepening racial and socioeconomic segregation is producing unequal educa- tional outcomes at the K-12 level, outcomes that are then reproduced in higher education. This is particularlytrue as rising competition among colleges has led many of them to focus increasingly on measures of merit that correlate with in- come and as parents and students adjust their behavior in light of those metrics. While existing affirmative action programs at colleges provide some counterweight to this dynamic, they are limited by institutional (and constitutional) constraints. Out of concern for revenue and rankings, many colleges are constrained in the number of students from low-income backgrounds they are willing to admit. Such a limited scope is not inevitable, however. If colleges were to give a substantial admissions bonus to applicants who had attended K-12 schools with at least a certain percentage of low-income students, higher education could become a force for countering inequality at the K-12 level, instead of reproducing it. College admissions policies serve as a crucial reference point for parents, students, and educators on down through K-12. By rewarding applicantsfor attending socioeconomically integrated schools, colleges would mo- bilize the resources of private actors across the country towards integration. The benefits of this would be significant, especiallyfor students from low-income fami- lies who would have an increased chance of attendingintegrated K-12 schools as a result. Such a policy would also help colleges better foster diversity on campuses, as more students would have had priorexperience in integrated settings.
    [Show full text]
  • ''What Lips These Lips Have Kissed'': Refiguring the Politics of Queer Public Kissing
    Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2006, pp. 1Á/26 ‘‘What Lips These Lips Have Kissed’’: Refiguring the Politics of Queer Public Kissing Charles E. Morris III & John M. Sloop In this essay, we argue that man-on-man kissing, and its representations, have been insufficiently mobilized within apolitical, incremental, and assimilationist pro-gay logics of visibility. In response, we call for a perspective that understands man-on-man kissing as a political imperative and kairotic. After a critical analysis of man-on-man kissing’s relation to such politics, we discuss how it can be utilized as a juggernaut in a broader project of queer world making, and investigate ideological, political, and economic barriers to the creation of this queer kissing ‘‘visual mass.’’ We conclude with relevant implications regarding same-sex kissing and the politics of visible pleasure. Keywords: Same-Sex Kissing; Queer Politics; Public Sex; Gay Representation In general, one may pronounce kissing dangerous. A spark of fire has often been struck out of the collision of lips that has blown up the whole magazine of 1 virtue.*/Anonymous, 1803 Kissing, in certain figurations, has lost none of its hot promise since our epigraph was penned two centuries ago. Its ongoing transformative combustion may be witnessed in two extraordinarily divergent perspectives on its cultural representation and political implications. In 2001, queer filmmaker Bruce LaBruce offered in Toronto’s Eye Weekly a noteworthy rave of the sophomoric buddy film Dude, Where’s My Car? One scene in particular inspired LaBruce, in which we find our stoned protagonists Jesse (Ashton Kutcher) and Chester (Seann William Scott) idling at a stoplight next to superhunk Fabio and his equally alluring female passenger.
    [Show full text]
  • Betsy Wade Drinks: 6 P.M
    Society of the Silurians LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD BANQUET The National Arts Club 15 Gramercy Park South Wednesday, November 16, 2016 Honoring Betsy Wade Drinks: 6 P.M. • Dinner: 7:15 P.M. Meet old friends and award winners Published by The Society of The Silurians, Inc., an organization (212) 532-0887 Members and One Guest $100 each of veteran New York City journalists founded in 1924 Non-Members $120 NOVEMBER 2016 Betsy Wade: Game Changer BY MYRON KANDEL ot many people can be cred- ited with helping change the Ncourse of journalistic history, but we Silurians can be proud that one of them is our own long-time devoted mem- ber Betsy Wade, the worthy recipient of this year’s Lifetime Achievement Award. In addition to a distinguished news- paper career, which itself merits this award, Betsy is enshrined in history as a leading member of the group of brave and intrepid women who challenged The New York Times for its treatment of female employees. That effort, which developed into a precedent-setting 1974 class action suit, Elizabeth Boylan, et. al. vs. The New York Times, reverberated far beyond the confines of the paper’s offices, then lo- cated on West 43rd Street. Publishers and editors around the country began thinking that if the august Times could be accused of treating its women staffers improperly, perhaps they had better re-evaluate their own behavior. Slowly, and sometimes painfully, the tide began to turn toward greater equality, a movement that still hasn’t been fully achieved. Betsy and her six other named plaintiffs deserve appre- ciation from the generations of women journalists past, present and future, who have benefited, and will benefit, from their courageous action.
    [Show full text]
  • Contempt of Courts? President Trump's
    CONTEMPT OF COURTS? PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TRANSFORMATION OF THE JUDICIARY Brendan Williams* Faced with a letter from the American Bar Association (ABA) assessing him as “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice,” Lawrence VanDyke, nominated by President Trump to serve on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, cried during an October 2019 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.1 Republican senators dutifully attacked the ABA as liberally-biased.2 In a Wall Street Journal column, a defender of VanDyke assailed what he called a “smear campaign” and wrote that “[t]he ABA’s aggressive politicization is especially frustrating for someone like me, an active member of the ABA[.]”3 VanDyke was confirmed anyway.4 Contrary to Republican protestations, the ABA has deemed 97% of President Trump’s nominees to be “well qualified” or “qualified.”5 Indeed, in the most polarizing judicial nomination of the Trump Administration, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh’s defenders pointed to the ABA having rated him “well qualified” despite the association having once, in 2006, dropped his rating to “qualified” due to concerns about his temperament.6 *Attorney Brendan Williams is the author of over 30 law review articles, predominantly on civil rights and health care issues. A former Washington Supreme Court judicial clerk, Brendan is a New Hampshire long-term care advocate. This article is dedicated to his father Wayne Williams, admitted to the Washington bar in 1970. 1Hannah Knowles, Trump Judicial Nominee Cries over Scathing Letter from the American Bar Association, WASH. POST (Oct. 30, 2015). 2Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan's Rooftop Bars
    The Tipsy Diaries - Manhattan’s Rooftop Bars - Heaven’s Gates - NYTimes.com 10/4/10 7:04 PM TimesPeople HOME PAGE TODAY'S PAPER VIDEO MOST POPULAR TIMES TOPICS Subscribe to The Times Log In Register Now TimesPeople Search All NYTimes.com Dining & Wine WORLD U.S. N.Y. / REGION BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY SCIENCE HEALTH SPORTS OPINION ARTS STYLE TRAVEL JOBS REAL ESTATE AUTOS FASHION & STYLE DINING & WINE HOME & GARDEN WEDDINGS/CELEBRATIONS T MAGAZINE THE TIPSY DIARIES Log in to see what your friends Log In With Facebook Manhattan’s Rooftop Bars: Heaven’s Gates are sharing on nytimes.com. Privacy Policy | What’s This? What’s Popular Now Pioneer of In Fear and Favor Vitro Fertilization Wins Nobel Prize Log in to see what your friends Log In With Facebook are sharing on nytimes.com. Privacy Policy | What’s This? What’s Popular Now Pioneer of In Fear and Favor Vitro Fertilization Wins Nobel Prize Andrew Sullivan for The New York Times Tech Update The scene at Press, the rooftop bar of the new Ink48 hotel. Sign up for Tech Update: an afternoon e-mail newsletter By FRANK BRUNI with the latest tech news spanning the Web. Published: July 22, 2010 See Sample | Privacy Policy Shaken or stirred? Red or white? Draft or bottled? For most of the RECOMMEND year these are the biggest questions confronting the thirsty New TWITTER Yorker. And no answer is wrong. RECOMMEND TWITTER Enlarge This Image But when the sun is strong and the days are long, an additional, equally COMMENTS (82) important pair of options crops up, SIGN IN TO E- MAIL and the choice between them can PRINT make or break a good night.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from a (Slightly) Blue State
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 40 Issue 3 The Legislative Backlash to Advances in Rights for Same-Sex Couples Spring 2005 The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from a (Slightly) Blue State John G. Culhane Stacey L. Sobel Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John G. Culhane, & Stacey L. Sobel, The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from a (Slightly) Blue State, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 443 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol40/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Culhane and Sobel: The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from THE GAY MARRIAGE BACKLASH AND ITS SPILLOVER EFFECTS: LESSONS FROM A (SLIGHTLY) "BLUE STATE" John G. Culhane* and Stacey L. Sobel** I. INTRODUCTION Backlash, indeed! The stories streaming in from across the country can scarcely be believed. In Alabama, a legislator introduced a bill that would have banished any mention of homosexuality from all public libraries-even at the university level.' In Virginia, the legislature's enthusiasm for joining the chorus of states that have amended their constitutions to ban gay marriage was eclipsed by a legislator's suggestion that the state's license plates be pressed into service as political slogans, and made to read: "Traditional Marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Channel for Gay America? a Cultural Criticism of the Logo Channel’S Commercial
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 7-14-2008 The hC annel for Gay America? A Cultural Criticism of The Logo Channel’s Commercial Success on American Cable Television Michael Johnson Jr. University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Johnson, Michael Jr., "The hC annel for Gay America? A Cultural Criticism of The Logo Channel’s Commercial Success on American Cable Television" (2008). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/321 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Channel for Gay America? A Cultural Criticism of The Logo Channel’s Commercial Success on American Cable Television by Michael Johnson Jr. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Liberal Arts Department of Humanities & American Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Elizabeth Bell, Ph.D. David Johnson, Ph.D. Sara Crawley, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 14, 2008 Keywords: Advertisement, Programming, Queer, Sexuality, Activism © Copyright 2008, Michael Johnson Jr. Acknowledgements I can’t begin to express the depth of appreciation I have for everyone that has supported me throughout this short but exhausting intellectual endeavor. Thanks to David Johnson, Ph.D. & Sara Crawley, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Rights and HIV/AIDS
    The Annual Update of the ACLU’s Nationwide Work on LGBT Rights and HIV/AIDS 2 x 2006 ANNUAL UPDATE ANNUAL UPDATE OF THE ACLU’S NATIONWIDE WORK ON LGBT RIGHTS AND HIV/AIDS ACLU Foundation LESBIAN & GAY RIGHTS AND AIDS PROJECT 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 (212) 549-2627 [email protected] aclu.org/lgbt aclu.org/hivaids Contents PERSPECTIVES DISCRIMINATION 5 LGBT Rights: A Core ACLU Issue 46 Cruel and Unusual 7 70 / 50 / 20 48 Discrimination Docket 10 Memories of the Beginning of the Project TRANSGENDER 11 The ACLU and the Gay Liberation Movement 57 Fit to Serve 14 Founding Supporters 58 Transgender Docket RELATIONSHIPS HIV/AIDS 16 Portraits of Marriage 62 Get Out of Town 20 Relationships Docket 64 HIV/AIDS Docket PARENTING 66 CONTRIBUTORS 28 Foreword to TOO HIGH A PRICE 76 ABOUT US 30 Parenting Docket 78 COOPERATING ATTORNEYS YOUTH & SCHOOLS 36 The Other O.C. 38 Youth & Schools Docket PERSPECTIVES yIn this 1987 photo, ACLU staff and supporters announce the arrival of the new Lesbian and Gay Rights Project at a public demonstration. LGBT Rights: A Core ACLU Issue By Anthony D. Romero, ACLU Executive Director As the essays by Matt Coles, Robert Nakatani, y Anthony D. Romero is the Executive Director of the he fight for LGBT rights is a central ACLU American Civil Liberties Union. concern because the fight for LGBT rights and Nan Hunter that follow show, the ACLU is T is a core civil liberties issue. It’s not about hardly a newcomer to the fight for LGBT rights.
    [Show full text]