Download Document

SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS

ACF GOAL MACCA TEARFUND ACTED GTZ Malteser Terre des Hommes ADRA Handicap International Medair UNAIDS Afghanaid HELP Mercy Corps UNDP AVSI HelpAge International MERLIN UNDSS CARE Humedica NPA UNESCO CARITAS IMC NRC UNFPA CONCERN INTERSOS OCHA UN-HABITAT COOPI IOM OHCHR UNHCR CRS IRC OXFAM UNICEF CWS IRIN Première Urgence WFP DRC Islamic Relief Worldwide Save the Children WHO FAO LWF Solidarités World Vision International

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 Table I: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by cluster) ...... 3 Table II: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by appealing organization)...... 4 Table III: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by priority)...... 5

2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT, HUMANITARIAN NEEDS, AND RESPONSE...... 6

3. PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND SECTORAL TARGETS ... 8 3.1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES...... 8 3.2 SECTOR RESPONSE PLANS...... 9 Education ...... 9 Food Security and Agricultural Livelihoods...... 11 Health and HIV/AIDS...... 16 Nutrition ...... 18 Protection ...... 21 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) ...... 25 Refugees ...... 27

4. FORWARD VIEW ...... 29

ANNEX I: LIST OF PROJECTS AND FUNDING TABLES...... 30 Table IV: List of Appeal projects (grouped by cluster), with funding status of each ...... 30 Table V: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by location)...... 39 Table VI: Total funding per donor (to projects listed in the Appeal) ...... 40 Table VII: Total humanitarian assistance per donor (Appeal plus other) ...... 41 Table VIII: Summary of funding to projects not listed in the Appeal...... 42

ANNEX II: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...... 43

Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://www.humanitarianappeal.net.

Full project details can be viewed, downloaded and printed from www.reliefweb.int/fts.

ii i

SUDAN 0 50 100 150 200

KOBOKO KAABONG YUMBE Moyo MOYO KITGUM Kaabong Koboko Yumbe Kitgum Adjumani P Arua ADJUMANI age ARUA Kotido Kib PA DE R ali Gulu Pader KOTIDO GULU To wn

O MOROTO

k o

k Moroto Nebbi NEBBI A cu r APAC wa ke DEMOCRATIC Lira O Nile Apac LIRA Amuria REPUBLIC Victoria OF THE CONGO UGANDA AMURIA Katakwi MASINDI Nakapiripirit Lake Kaberamaido Lake Kwania KATAKWI Albert Masindi Soroti i NAKAPIRIPIRIT r a Amolatar h Bunia Lake S Hoima Kyoga NAKASONGOLA Kumi Kapchorwa HOIMA KUMI 14 Nakasongola 13 KAMULI Sironko Pallisa 12 Bukwa si KIBOGA NAKASEKE Kayunga Nku KALIRO PA LL I SA L Mbale BUNDIBUGYO u Kamuli Kibaale Kiboga g V Butaleja 10 11 i Kaliro o c Luweero t 7 o Manafwa KIBAALE r 8 i Bundibugyo Nakaseke 6 a IGANGA TORORO Fort Portal N i Iganga Kyenjojo l e Tororo i Mubende JINJA a lik KABAROLE KYENJOJO MITYANA ol m Wakiso Jinja z e MUBENDE Bugiri 9 N S Mukono Mayuge Busia Kakamega Kasese Kamwenge Masaka Mityana MUKONO KAMPALA MAYUGE MPIGI Mpigi KENYA KASESE Katonga WA KI S O BUGIRI Sembabule Ibanda KIRUHURA Kisumu MASAKA Lake Kalangala Winam Gulf Edward BUSHENYI Kiruhura Masaka Bushenyi KALANGALA Lake 4 Mbarara Victora Rakai 2 Rukungiri Kanungu ISINGIRO RAKAI Ntungamo Kasese 5 1 Kabale UNITED Kisoro 3 REPUBLIC OF RWANDA TANZANIA

Legend Elevation (meters) 5,000 and above National capital 4,000 - 5,000 First administrative level capital 3,000 - 4,000 Populated place 2,500 - 3,000 2,000 - 2,500 International boundary 1,500 - 2,000 First administrative level boundary 1,000 - 1,500 800 - 1,000 Districts 600 - 800 400 - 600 1. Kisoro, 2. Kanungu. 3. Kabale, 4. Rukungiri, 5. Ntungamo, 200 - 400 6. Luweero, 7. Kuyunga, 8. Butajela, 9. Busia, 10. Mbale, 0-200 11. Manafwa, 12. Sironko, 13. Kapchorwa, 14. Bukwa Below sea level

Disclaimers: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Map data sources: CGIAR, United Nations Cartographic Section, ESRI, Europa Technologies, UN OCHA.

i v UGANDA

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Midway through the 2010 Consolidated Appeal (CAP), the humanitarian context in Uganda remains largely unchanged. While confidence in the sustainability of the current peace has resulted in significant homeward movements by internally displaced people (IDPs) and the closure of three- quarters of the camps, the dearth of basic social services continues to be a fundamental concern in northern Uganda and in Teso. Without significant improvement in their access to such essential services as safe water, sanitation, healthcare, and protection, IDPs returning to villages of origin cannot be said to have found durable solutions to their plight. Meaningful investment in such basic services is not only an effective approach to reducing, for instance, acute vulnerabilities to diseases like hepatitis E, but also represents a concrete peace dividend without which an effective transition from conflict to recovery and development is impossible.

Similarly for Karamoja – where the livelihoods of close to a million people remain chronically fragile amid insecurity, climate change and historical marginalization – priority humanitarian action for the remainder of 2010 must address basic service needs within a wider development paradigm. Occasional excesses associated with the ongoing disarmament programme by the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) highlight the urgent need to support the expansion of civilian rule-of-law structures. The outbreak of cholera and the persistence of hepatitis E, which combined have infected over 1,000 people, signify unmitigated vulnerabilities amongst the population, acute deficiencies in safe water and sanitation coverage, and the inadequate availability of essential drugs and human resources.

Across Uganda, natural disasters continue to pose serious threats to life and livelihoods, as illustrated by the landslides and floods in eastern and western Uganda at the beginning of March 2010 that left an estimated 300 people dead and several thousand displaced. Disaster preparedness and response, therefore, remain central to humanitarian concerns in 2010.

Thus, the strategic objectives for the Uganda CAP 2010 are unchanged at the Mid-Year Review. Through the projects in the Appeal, humanitarian actors have committed to support the Government in basic service provision, food security, and emergency preparedness and response. Some two million vulnerable people, including residual and returning IDPs in Acholi and Teso regions, food-insecure populations in Karamoja region, and 143,000 refugees in the West Nile and south-western regions of the country will be targeted through projects worth a revised US$184,398,188. 1

But the success of this humanitarian plan is contingent on robust donor response to these projects. Unfortunately, at only 31% funding by June, the Uganda CAP 2010 – despite being the smallest in four years and representing a substantial reduction from the preceding Appeal – has realized the lowest funding of all previous Uganda CAPs at a corresponding stage in the last six years.

Since 2000, nearly $1.5 billion has been invested in humanitarian actions in Uganda through the CAP. This largesse has helped to save lives, alleviate suffering, and protect the dignity of vulnerable and needy populations in Uganda. The Uganda CAP 2010, which aims to address unique humanitarian needs during a fragile transition from emergency to recovery and development, provides the opportunity to consolidate this substantial investment.

1 All dollar signs in this document denote United States dollars. Funding for this appeal should be reported to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS, [email protected]), which will display its requirements and funding on the current appeals page.

1 UGANDA

Some basic humanitarian and development facts about Uganda Most recent data Previously Population 31.7 million (Uganda Bureau of 30.7 million (UBOS, Statistics / UBOS, 2010) mid-2009) Gross domestic product per capita $420 (World Bank 2008) $370 (World Bank Economic 2007) status Percentage of population living 37.7% (UNDP HDR 2009) 55% below national poverty line (UNDP HDR 2005) Adult mortality 474/1,000 male (WHO 2006) 597 (WHO 2000) 518/1,000 female (WHO 2006) 559 (WHO 2000) Maternal mortality 440/100,000 (UNICEF 2007) 550 (UNICEF 2005) Under-five mortality 130/1,000 (UNICEF 2007) 135/1,000 (UNICEF 2005) Health Life expectancy 51.4 male (UNDP HDR 2009) 48.4 (UNDP HDR 52.4 female (UNDP HDR 2009) 2006) Number of health workforce 1/10,000 (2004) (MD+nurse+midwife) per 10,000 population Measles vaccination rate 89% (WHO 2006: Core indicators) Prevalence of under-nourishment 15% (FAO 2005 Statistics) 19 (International in total population Food Policy Research Institute [IFPRI] 2004) Under-five malnutrition rate 38% stunted 16% underweight Food & 6% wasted Nutrition (Uganda Demographic and Health Survey [UDHS] 2006) Under-nutrition among women 12% (UDHS 2006) (15-49 years) Food insecurity 2,027,000 in Acholi, Karamoja, eastern Teso (IPC 2009) Proportion of population without 36% (UNDP HDR 2009); 50% in 40% (UNDP HDR sustainable access to an improved IDP return areas 2007) WASH drinking water source Consumption of potable water (not available) (litres/person/day) Internally displaced people 200,000 370,000 (2009) (number and percentage of Population population) Movements Refugees In-country 143,352 (UNHCR) Abroad (not available) ECHO Vulnerability and Crisis Vulnerability Index: 3 Vulnerability Index 3 Index score Crisis Index: 3 Crisis Index 3 Other UNDP Human Development Index 157 (UNDP HDR 2009) 144 (UNDP HDR vulnerability score 2005) indices IASC Early Warning - Early Action Priority 2 rating

2 UGANDA

Table I: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by cluster)

Table I: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by cluster) Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.

Cluster Total Original Revised Carry- Unmet % Uncommitted Funding resources requirements requirements over requirements Covered pledges available

($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) A B C D E=C+D B-E E/B F COORDINATION 2,678,159 2,370,305 1,985,784 510,218 2,496,002 - 125,697 105% - EDUCATION 1,911,645 955,822 - - - 955,822 0% - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 7,050,552 5,328,642 - - - 5,328,642 0% - AND RESPONSE FOOD SECURITY AND 67,911,112 65,926,961 11,946,648 7,295,356 19,242,004 46,684,957 29% - AGRICULTURAL LIVELIHOODS HEALTH AND 12,919,670 10,541,093 - 1,094,671 1,094,671 9,446,422 10% - HIV/AIDS NUTRITION 7,351,725 7,548,523 1,291,490 3,612,794 4,904,284 2,644,239 65% - PROTECTION 16,896,515 16,198,875 - 10,875,231 10,875,231 5,323,644 67% - REFUGEES 66,598,667 65,910,683 8,333,950 3,851,718 12,185,668 53,725,015 18% - WATER AND 13,966,350 9,617,284 - 3,337,085 3,337,085 6,280,199 35% - SANITATION CLUSTER NOT - - 313,972 3,094,846 3,408,818 n/a n/a - SPECIFIED Grand Total 197,284,395 184,398,188 23,871,844 33,671,919 57,543,763 126,854,425 31% -

NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments

Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity.

The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 25 June 2010. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts).

3 UGANDA

Table II: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by appealing organization)

Table II: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by appealing organization) Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.

Total Appealing Original Revised Carry- Funding Unmet % Uncommitted resources Organization Requirements Requirements over ($) Requirements Covered pledges available

($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) A B C D E=C+D B-E E/B F ACF 2,929,333 2,368,960 -562,852 562,852 1,806,108 24% - ACTED 1,270,000 1,270,000 - - - 1,270,000 0% - ASB 1,985,000 1,985,000 - - - 1,985,000 0% - AVSI 1,000,000 600,000 - - - 600,000 0% - C&D 1,920,000 1,390,000 - - - 1,390,000 0% - CESVI 1,127,870 931,922 - - - 931,922 0% - COOPI 578,800 578,800 - - - 578,800 0% - CPAR 2,151,937 2,151,937 - - - 2,151,937 0% - CW 775,000 775,000 -418,437 418,437 356,563 54% - Danchurchaid 1,182,264 1,182,264 - - - 1,182,264 0% - DRC 1,971,250 1,971,250 - - - 1,971,250 0% - ERF (OCHA) - - 313,972 551,753 865,725 n/a n/a - FAO 10,206,000 10,206,000 -280,112 280,112 9,925,888 3% - GOAL 1,994,992 1,994,992 -1,329,560 1,329,560 665,432 67% - IAS 243,800 243,800 - - - 243,800 0% - IMC 581,600 581,600 - - - 581,600 0% - IOM 2,039,362 2,039,362 -313,862 313,862 1,725,500 15% - JEEP 189,000 189,000 - - - 189,000 0% - MADEFO 1,477,000 1,477,000 - - - 1,477,000 0% - Malaria Consortium 739,450 739,450 - - - 739,450 0% - OCHA 2,678,159 2,370,305 1,985,784 510,218 2,496,002 - 125,697 100% - OHCHR 437,557 437,557 -437,557 437,557 - 100% - OXFAM GB 4,135,600 3,883,600 - 2,203,227 2,203,227 1,680,373 57% - Restore Hope 289,500 289,500 - - - 289,500 0% - Samaritan's Purse 1,746,318 1,368,668 - - - 1,368,668 0% - UNFPA 1,658,500 1,658,500 -536,641 536,641 1,121,859 32% - UNHCR 54,493,653 54,493,653 - 12,776,457 12,776,457 41,717,196 23% - UNICEF 20,265,576 12,796,711 -4,656,551 4,656,551 8,140,160 36% - VIA 268,000 268,000 - - - 268,000 0% - VSF (Belgium) 788,205 788,205 - - - 788,205 0% - WFP 67,118,020 65,669,869 21,572,088 7,618,744 29,190,832 36,479,037 44% - WHO 7,049,612 5,963,502 -1,475,948 1,475,948 4,487,554 25% - WVI 363,772 210,018 - - - 210,018 0% - ZOA Refugee Care 1,629,265 1,523,763 - - - 1,523,763 0% - Grand Total 197,284,395 184,398,188 23,871,844 33,671,919 57,543,763 126,854,425 31% -

NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments

4 UGANDA

Table III: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by priority)

Table III: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by priority) Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.

Priority Original Revised Funding Unmet % Uncommitted requirements requirements requirements Covered pledges ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) A B C B-C C/B D Priority A 102,511,797 94,672,658 23,626,136 71,046,522 25% -

Priority B 87,022,046 83,696,888 30,508,809 53,188,079 36% -

Priority C 7,750,552 6,028,642 865,725 5,162,917 14% -

5 UGANDA

2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT, HUMANITARIAN NEEDS, AND RESPONSE

As predicted in the most likely scenario for Acholi region, camp decommissioning has gained momentum as the majority of IDPs return home: some 68% of the 121 officially recognized camps had been decommissioned by May 2010. However, several camps, particularly in the newly created district of Lamwo, continue to host a significant number of IDPs due to the presence of unexploded ordnance in return areas, or border conflicts with Southern Sudan.2 Land conflicts, inter-clan disputes and Karamojong cattle raids have also grown in prominence as factors hindering return in districts like Kitgum and Pader. In addition, the fate of the extremely vulnerable individuals (EVIs) and people with special needs (PSNs) remains of pressing concern. Close to 5,000 EVIs/PSNs, the majority (76%) women, are estimated to still be living in the camps.3 For these residual IDP caseloads, genuine and durable solutions to their displacement continue to be a paramount need. The region’s fragile transition from crisis continues to require the increased presence and impact of recovery interventions, notwithstanding the activation of the Peace, Reconstruction and Development Plan for Northern Uganda (PRDP) and the second phase of the Northern Uganda Social Action Fund (NUSAF II). The PRDP at present remains focused on directing its funds towards only the hardware aspects of basic service provision. Consequently, human resource, capacity and equipment gaps remain critical across the region, adversely affecting service delivery in all sectors even as new facilities and infrastructure are being constructed. The region’s continued vulnerability to diseases is a reflection of such gaps, with hepatitis E remaining uncontained since 2007, polio breaking out in 2009, and cholera likely to occur this year.

In the Teso region, progress has also been made in the displacement situation, with the District Disaster Management Committees (DDMCs) of Katakwi and Amuria declaring all but one of the 61 officially recognized IDP camps decommissioned. However, concerns have been expressed at the lack of a camp phase-out process prior to the DDMCs’ decisions, and at the IDP caseload of mostly EVIs still residing in the camps. The most likely scenario remains valid for the region, envisaging the continuation of: a precarious food security situation due to unpredictable weather patterns, prevailing rains notwithstanding; inadequate access to basic services in return areas; perceptions of a widening transition gap on account of few recovery actors and activities; and weak district capacity to prepare for and respond to natural disasters.

The situation in Karamoja region continues to unfold according to the most likely scenario but tending toward the worst case. While there is some confidence that security in the region will improve due in part to increased military and police deployments, the environment remains highly volatile, with ambushes and killings by illegally armed elements persisting. Continuing cattle raids have on occasion prompted extreme responses from the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF), including aerial bombardments of kraals in Kotido during January 2010. Human rights actors remain concerned by the military’s conduct of cordon and search operations under the disarmament exercise, citing disproportionate use of force and rights abuses. 4 Although the humanitarian and development communities are expanding their presence, fears over insecurity in remote areas such as Loyoro and Kalapata sub-counties in Kaabong District mean the implementation and impact of interventions remains uneven. Moreover, access constraints are likely to worsen given the current rains, which have been heavier this year than in the previous two seasons. While they are expected to boost production in the green belt should they continue through the end of the season in October, the rains also carry the risk of aggravating food insecurity in the event of water-logging or flooding of crop fields. As of June, an estimated 37% of Karamoja’s population – or some 400,000 people – are dependent on food aid to make up food deficits of 40-70%.5 Chronic food insecurity in the region coupled with limited or weak coping mechanisms and extremely poor sanitation and safe water access have contributed to the population’s high vulnerability to epidemic outbreaks of disease. A cholera outbreak

2 See UNHCR, Status of Camp Closure Process in Acholi, Lango and Teso Sub-Regions, May 2010. 3 UNHCR, PSN Profiling Report, May 2010. 4 See, for instance, OHCHR press statement concerning a Cordon and Search operation in Lokitela Angilam, Apaputh, and Lomari Kraal of 7 May 2010 in Kotido District. The operation reportedly involved the use of rocket-propelled grenades against members of the community, resulting in at least 10 civilian deaths, five of whom were children. 5 FEWSNET, Uganda Food Security Update, May 2010.

6 UGANDA in April has to date affected 700 people and caused 15 deaths, while hepatitis E remains uncontained with a cumulative 487 cases since August 2009. This situation is of serious concern and an indicator of inadequate health service delivery in the region. Access to HIV/AIDS treatment still remains very low in the region.

In all three regions, the humanitarian community has also expressed concerns that pre-election processes might at the very least distract from essential coordination and response functions in the districts, or at worst trigger human rights abuses and violence. The lead-up to next year’s referendum in neighbouring Southern Sudan also remains a process to watch keenly, with the worst-case scenario envisaging 150,000 Sudanese crossing the border into Uganda should violence flare up in their country.

Elsewhere in the country, landslides and flooding occurred in March 2010 in the mountainous areas of eastern Uganda and in several districts west of the country following consecutive days of heavy rainfall. The landslides buried three villages in Bududa District, leaving over 300 residents dead or missing and causing the displacement of more than 3,000 people.6 Such tragic occurrences and the frequent epidemic outbreaks of diseases such as cholera and hepatitis E illustrate the country’s extremely high vulnerability to natural disasters.

Finally, poor funding is significantly hampering the humanitarian community’s efforts to meet the collective goals agreed for 2010. At only 31% at the end of June, the Uganda CAP7 2010 is the least funded of all previous appeals at a corresponding stage since 2004, with 40% of the realized funds consisting of carry-overs. Moreover, the highest priority projects – those supporting the provision of basic services in Acholi and Karamoja, and food and nutritional security in Teso – have received less donor attention in dollar and percentage terms despite targeting the biggest number of beneficiaries (see table below).

Revised % Priority Funding requirements Covered

Priority A $94.7 million $23.6 million 25%

Priority B $83.7 million $30.5 million 36%

Priority C $6.0 million $0.9 million 14%

Projects not counted in the CAP have attracted only $4.7 million of donor funding in 2010, compared to $34 million (excluding carry-over) for CAP projects.

6 See OCHA Situation Reports on the Eastern Uganda Landslides and Floods, March 2010. 7 CAP can stand for Consolidated Appeal or Consolidated Appeal Process, depending on context.

7 UGANDA

3. PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND SECTORAL TARGETS

3.1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES Strategic Objective 1 To supplement Government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering: As the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three Durable Solutions in Acholi and Teso As the basis for the promotion of human rights and the appropriate development strategies in Karamoja

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Completeness and timeliness of 85% 85% achieved for Gulu, Amuru and Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Lamwo districts Response (IDSR) reports (Acholi region) Number of camps closed/ transformed 61 60 IDP camps closed save for Amootom into viable communities (Teso region) camp, which remains open due to security concerns. Camp phase-out activities are ongoing in all closed camps. Number of PSN/EVIs supported to 10,200 PSNs/EVIs 1,154 provided with shelter/905 latrines, achieve durable solutions (Acholi region) and 691 PSN/EVIs with land related issues assisted to obtain Certificates of Customary Ownership (CCO)

Strategic Objective 2 To enhance food and nutritional security to save lives, alleviate suffering and kick-start livelihoods.

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of severely and moderately 3,800 severely and 1,438 children with severe acute malnourished children treated (Acholi 19,000 moderately malnutrition (SAM) treated and 4,642 region) malnourished children with moderate acute malnutrition children (MAM) treated in supplementary feeding programmes (SFPs) Number of households supported with 99,952 EVIs 99,570 EVIs reached with 5,967 MTs of food aid and food security interventions food aid (Acholi region) Percentage of livestock population 80% Peste de petits ruminants vaccinated against trans-boundary (PPR): 1,500,000 shoats (106% of livestock diseases and provided with estimated shoats population) supportive therapeutic care (Karamoja Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia region) (CBPP): 770,000 heads of cattle (87% of the estimated cattle population)

Strategic Objective 3 To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response.

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of districts with emergency 4 All the districts have emergency preparedness plans preparedness plans with completed completed with WASH component WASH components (Acholi region) Number of Integrated (Food Security) 2 National IPC map/analysis templates released in May Phase Classification (IPC) 2010 outcomes/maps released per year % of asylum-seekers accepted as 100% All new arrivals referred to UNHCR by Office of the refugees are registered and receive Prime Minister (OPM) registered, referred to the protection/ material assistance in a settlements, and non-food items (NFIs) + food rations coordinated and timely manner provided to each household. 100% of all the asylum- seekers granted refugee status registered and provided with the required food and NFI assistance in a timely manner

8 UGANDA

3.2 SECTOR RESPONSE PLANS Education

SAVE THE CHILDEN/ UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND Lead Agency (SCiUG/UNICEF) UNICEF, Forum for Education NGOs in Uganda (FENU), Community Support for Capacity Development (CSCD), War Child Holland (WCH), Straight Talk Foundation (STF), International Rescue Committee (IRC), Member organizations SCiUG, Cooperation and Development (C&D), Church of Uganda (CoU), Catholic Church, United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), Girl Education Movement (GEM), United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative (UNGEI), Adventist Development and Relief Agency (ADRA) Number of Projects One project 30,000 children enrolled in primary schools and 407,000 children enrolled Beneficiaries in non-formal education Funds Requested $955,822 changed from $1,911,645 Funds Requested per Priority Priority A – $955,822 changed from $1,911,645 Level Name: Bonita Birungi, Title: Regional Education Advisor E-mail: [email protected] Contact Information Name: Margo O’Sullivan Title: Chief Education Email:[email protected]

Strategic Objective 1: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions fro achievements of the three durable solutions Cluster Objectives Increase access to quality education and provide opportunities for mobile schooling to increase timely enrolment, retention and completion of primary education Increase education opportunities for children with disabilities Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of children by gender aged 3-5 15% 3,756 (boys 17,331, girls 20,425) more years who are enrolled in early childhood children are accessing ECD centres that development (ECD) centres provide activities of play, pre-reading and writing, growth monitoring, and supplementary feeding Percentage of school-age children by 50% 132,569 children enrolled in primary gender enrolled in primary school schools in all districts in Karamoja. (69,415,girls and boys 73,154 boys) Number of children who are enrolled in non- 40,000 20,327 (boys 8,173 and girls 12,154) formal education centres children enrolled in the 209 non-formal education centres. Gender parity at access and completion 50% At lower primary level, girls’ and boys’ levels in primary education access is almost at par, but at the upper primary level, the number of girls continues to drop between P.5-P.7 Pupil-stance ratio by gender 30% The ratio in the districts is on average 1: 67, except for Kaabong which is 1:89; against a national average of 1:40 Percentage of primary school teachers who 33% The percentage of female teachers in are female the region is 33% compared to 67% for male teachers

9 UGANDA

Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Build capacity of communities and District Local Government staff to better prepare for disasters and reduce their effects on communities Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Existence of contingency plan in each 5 districts Moroto, Nakapiripirit and Amudat target district districts have developed contingency plans. Implementation of these plans has not yet commenced

Process ongoing for Kotido, Kabong and Abim districts Number of district, and sub-county staff 6 districts Data not available except for Moroto trained on Disaster Risk Reduction and where 14 districts and 12 sub-county Response (DRRR) staff have been trained in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Number of district and sub-county local 6 districts Data not available governments and schools with Emergency in Education DRRR Plans

10 UGANDA

Food Security and Agricultural Livelihoods

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED Cluster Lead NATIONS / UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME (FAO / WFP) Karamoja region: Action Against Hunger (ACF), Agency for Cooperation and Technical Development (ACTED), Cooperation and Development (C&D), Caritas-Kotido, Caritas-Moroto, FAO, Karamoja Agro-Pastoral Development Programme (KADP), Karamoja Dioceses Development Services (KDDS), Kotido Central Veterinary Care (KCVC), Dodoth Community Animal Health Workers’ Association (DOCAHWA), Matheniko Community Animal Health Workers’ Association (MACAHWA), Samaritan’s Purse, Save the Children in Uganda (SCiUG), Véterinaires sans Frontières (VsF)-Belgium, WFP

Acholi region: Agricultural Cooperative Development International and Volunteers in Overseas Cooperative Assistance (ACDI/VOCA), ACTED, ACF, Africa 2000 Network, Arbeiter-Samariter-Bund (ASB), Association Member organizations of Uganda Professional Women in Agriculture and Environment (AUPWAE), Canadian Physicians for Aid and Relief (CPAR), CARE International, Caritas-Gulu, Caritas-Kitgum, Caritas-Pader, Catholic Relief Services (CRS), Cooperazione e’ Sviluppo (CESVI), Concern World Wide, Cooperazione Internazionale (COOPI), Danish Refugee Council (DRC), FAO, International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR), Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), Food for the Hungry (FH-U), GOAL, Lutheran World Federation (LWF), International Aid Services (IAS), Mercy Corps, SCiUG, WFP, World Vision (WV), ZOA

Teso region: ASB, CoU-Teso Dioceses, Planning And Development Office, FAO, Holistic Services in Uganda, LWF, Temele Development Organization (TDO), WFP Number of Projects 33 Projects Food: 99,721 EVIs for Acholi; 308,869 EVIs and food-insecure for Beneficiaries Karamoja Funds Requested $65,926,961 changed from $67,911,112 Priority A – $5,465,319 Funds Requested per Priority Priority B – 59,761,642 changed from $61,745,793 Level Priority C – $700,000 Alexis Bonte: [email protected] Contact Information Daniel Molla: [email protected]

ACHOLI REGION Strategic Objective 1: To enhance food and nutritional security to save lives, alleviate suffering and kick-start livelihoods Cluster Objectives Save lives of EVIs in Karamoja, Acholi and Teso regions Protect and improve the food production capacity of returning households and those affected by climatic hazards Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of households supported Food security interventions: 120,365 Food security interventions: 68,677 (food aid and food security households8 households interventions) Food aid interventions Food aid interventions i) EVIs targeted for general food i) 99,570 EVIs were reached with distribution (GFD) – 99,952 5,967 MTs of food aid

ii) Supplementary and therapeutic ii) 20,352 people were reached feeding – 31,851 people with supplementary and therapeutic feeding

8 Computed from Uganda Integrated Food Security Phase Classification September 2009 – January 2010: Population in Acute Food and Livelihood Crisis divided by an average household size of eight members.

11 UGANDA

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Quantity and quality of food, i) 9,715 MTs of food aid planned i) 5,967 MTs of food aid distributed agricultural inputs, etc provided under GFD under GFD per household ii) 491 MTs of food aid planned ii) 96 MTs distributed under under nutrition programme nutrition programme

iii) The quantity and quality of inputs iii) $ 100 worth of assorted seed not specified (depends on types of per Farmer Field School (FFS) of inputs and beneficiaries) 30 households for 80 FFS (2,400 households) Access to household food stocks 500 kg per person per year Beans: 3% of households (HHs) - throughout the year 25.2 kg; Cassava: 7% HHs- 1.3 bags; Groundnuts: 20% HHs - 104.0 kg; Maize: 10% HHs - 80.0 kg; Millet: 10%HHs - 5.0 kg; Pigeon peas: 13%HHs - 26.3 kg; Simsim: 30% HHs- 47.3 kg; Sorghum: 60% HHs - 83.3 kg; Soybeans: 3%HHs - 60.0 kg; Sunflower: 3%HHs - 60.0 kg Consumption per household per At least four out of 12 groups Average household dietary diversity day score (HDDS9) = 3.95 HDDS < 2 = 5.3% of HHs; 3 – 4 = 74%; 5 – 6 = 21% Global acute malnutrition (GAM) <10% No latest Data available. Food Security and Nutrition Assessment in Acholi planned for July/Aug 2010 Number of coordination meetings 12 Four meetings held in each of the held and minutes produced at locations - Kampala, Gulu, Kitgum both the national and district and Pader levels Utilization of 4 acres of land per 4 acres No estimate at this time household per year (under normal rainfall pattern) Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective: Build capacity of communities and District Local Government staff to better prepare for disasters and reduce their effects on communities Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of IPC outcomes/maps 2 National IPC map/analysis released per year templates released in May 2010 Existence of District Contingency 1 per district Process yet to be initiated Plan in each target district Number of district local 5 No training done yet. Still government staff trained on scheduled Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction

9 Each food group mentioned by the household was assigned a value of 1, and the sum for all groups computed to obtain the household dietary diversity score (HDDS). The average HDDS for the sample population was obtained by dividing the sum of the HDDS, and dividing by the number of households in each sample {Average HDDS = Sum(HDDS)/Total Number of households}.

12 UGANDA

TESO REGION Strategic Objective 1: To enhance food and nutritional security to save lives, alleviate suffering and kick-start livelihoods Cluster Objectives Save lives of EVIs in Karamoja, Acholi and Teso regions Protect and improve food production capacity of returning households and those affected by climatic hazards Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of households Food security interventions: 18,892 Food security interventions: 9,670 supported (food aid and food households10 households reached security interventions) No food aid intervention planned for TESO region Utilization of four acres of land 4 acres per HH 11 Average land utilization/cropped per household per year (under per HH = 3.85 acres normal rainfall pattern) < acres = 43% of HHs; >2<4 acres = 29%; >4<6 acres = 10%; >6 acres = 19% Quantity and quality of food, Not specified (depends on types of 52 kg of assorted seeds (cow peas, agricultural inputs, etc provided inputs and beneficiaries) green grams, sorghum and millet) per household and 10 bags of vegetative materials for multiplication equivalent to six 240 kg of seeds and 1,200 bags of vegetative materials to (120 FFS or 3,600HHs) 7.2 MT of NERICA rice seeds Access to household food stocks 500 kg per person per year Sorghum: 40% of HHs – 46.3 kg; throughout the year Rice: 10% - 30.0 kg; Sweet potatoes (chips): 10% - 30.0Kg Millet: 5% - 20.0 kg; Cowpeas: 5% - 5.0 kg Consumption per household per At least 4 out of 12 food groups Average household dietary diversity day score (HDDS12) = 2.91 HDDS 0 2 = 33% of HHs; 3 – 4 = 62%; and 5 – 6 = 5% GAM rate <10% No latest Data available. Food Security and Nutrition Assessment in Teso region is planned for July/August 2010 Number of coordination meetings 12 Four meetings each in Kampala held and minutes produced at and in Soroti both the national and district levels Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Build capacity of communities and District Local Government staff to better prepare for disasters and reduce their effects on communities Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of release of IPC 2 National IPC map/analysis outcomes/maps per year templates released in May 2010 Existence of Contingency plan in 1 per district The planning process yet to start each target district Number of District Local 5 Not yet accomplished, still in plan Government staff trained on Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction

10 Computed from Uganda Integrated Food Security Phase Classification September 2009 – January 2010: Population in Acute Food and Livelihood Crisis divided by an average household size of eight members. 11 Katakwi and Amuria districts. 12 Each food group mentioned by the household was assigned a value of 1, and the sum for all groups computed to obtain the household dietary diversity score (HDDS). The average HDDS for the sample population was obtained by dividing the sum of the HDDS, and dividing by the number of households in each sample {Average HDDS = Sum(HDDS)/Total Number of households}.

13 UGANDA

KARAMOJA REGION Strategic Objective 1: To enhance food and nutritional security to save lives, alleviate suffering and kick-start livelihoods Cluster Objectives Save lives of EVIs in Karamoja, Acholi and Teso regions Protect and improve food production capacity of returning households and those affected by climatic hazards Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of livestock population 80% PPR: 1,500,000 goats & sheep vaccinated against trans-boundary representing 106% of the livestock diseases and provided estimated goat & sheep population with supportive therapeutic care CBPP: 770,000 heads of cattle representing 87% of the estimated cattle population Number of households supported Food security interventions: Food security interventions: 7,882 (food aid and food security 114,211 households13 households reached interventions) Food aid interventions: Food aid interventions i) 56,094 households (32,027 EVIs i) General food distributions began & 24,067 food-insecure) targeted in April 2010 at the start of the for GFD hunger season

ii) A total of 29,738 beneficiaries ii) 24,023 people reached targeted under community based supplementary feeding and therapeutic feeding programmes Utilization of four acres of land per 4 acres per HH Average land utilization/cropped household per year (under normal per HH = 4.47 acres rainfall pattern) < 2 acres = 18% of HHs; >2<4 acres = 40%; >4<6 acres = 38%; >6 acres = 4% Quantity and quality of food, Not specified (depends on types of i) 28,467 MTs of food aid planned agriculture inputs, etc provided per inputs and beneficiaries) for distribution under GFD. household Distributions began in April 2010 at the start of the hunger season

ii) 683 MTs of food aid planned under nutrition programmes (Jan- March) and 343 MTs distributed GAM rate <10% No latest Data available. Food Security and Nutrition Assessment in Karamoja is planned for Sept/Oct 2010 Access to household food stocks 500Kg per person per year Pigeon peas = 20 kg throughout the year Simsim = 10 kg Sorghum = 10 kg *Only 15% of HHs have food stocks Consumption per household per At least four out of 12 food groups Average household dietary diversity day score (HDDS14) = 1.55 HDDS: 1 = 50% of HHs; 2 = 45%; and 3 = 5% Number of food security 3 FFS, cassava multiplication, CAHW assessments conducted training results assessment and Household Economy Analysis are currently ongoing Number of coordination meetings 12 Four meetings each held in held and minutes produced at both Kampala and in Moroto and Kotido the national and district levels districts.

13 Computed from Uganda Integrated Food Security Phase Classification September 2009 – January 2010: Population in Acute Food and Livelihood Crisis divided by an average household size of eight members. 14 Each food group mentioned by the household was assigned a value of 1, and the sum for all groups computed to obtain the household dietary diversity score (HDDS). The average HDDS for the sample population was obtained by dividing the sum of the HDDS, and dividing by the number of households in each sample {Average HDDS = Sum(HDDS)/Total Number of households}.

14 UGANDA

Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Build capacity of communities and district local government staff to better prepare for disasters and reduce their effects on vulnerable populations Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of release of IPC outcomes/maps per 2 National IPC map/analysis year templates released in May Existence of contingency plan in each target 1 per district Process yet to start district Number of district local government staff trained 5 No training accomplished on Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction yet

15 UGANDA

Health and HIV/AIDS

Cluster Lead Agency WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) ACTED, CPAR, CARE, Caritas, Catholic Relief Services (CRS), CESVI, Concern, COOPI, DRC, Uganda Red Cross Society (URCS), NRC, FH(U), GOAL, LWF, Mercy Corps, Malaria Consortium, NRC, SCiUG, WFP, WV, Member organizations UNFPA, UNICEF, Visions in Action, WHO, Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI), American Refugee Committee (ARC), International Rescue Committee (IRC), MEDAIR, Trans-cultural Psycho- social Organization (TPO), Doctors with Africa-CUAMM Number of Projects 16 Projects Acholi: 550,000 (270,050 male and 279,950 female) Beneficiaries Karamoja: 1,147,400 (585,000 male and 562,400 female) Teso: 80,000 (38,400 male and 41,600 female) Funds Requested $10,541,093 changed from $12,919,670 Funds Requested per Priority Priority A – $9,236,243 changed from $11,103,345 Level Priority B – $1,304,850 changed from $1,816,325 Contact Information Dr. Solomon Fisseha, [email protected]

ACHOLI AND TESO REGIONS Strategic Objective: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievements of the three durable solutions Cluster Objectives To support and strengthen national and district capacity to timely detect and respond to health emergencies To improve access and coverage of high impact and life-saving child health interventions for all children under-five To increase availability of RH services so as to improve utilization of sexual and reproductive health (RH) services to IDPs and returning population To improve access to HIV/AIDS services to IDPs and returnee population To support districts in the control of the major neglected tropical diseases with emphasis to return areas To support and strengthen national and district capacity for improved coordination Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Completeness and timeliness of IDSR reports 80% 85% DPT3 coverage 90% 70% Case fatality rates of disease outbreaks Hepatitis E virus HEV 1.6% (HEV) < 2% Proportion of pregnant mother tested for HIV 80% 66% Proportion of pregnant mothers positive to HIV receiving 100% Gulu and Amuru districts>70% anti-retroviral therapy (ART) Kitgum and Pader districts <10% Proportion of people with advanced AIDS started on ART 47% Insufficient data Proportion of pregnant mothers receiving IPT2 80% 34% Proportion of institutional deliveries 50% 30% Proportion of planned meetings conducted 80% 60%

16 UGANDA

KARAMOJA REGION Strategic Objective: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievements of the three Durable Solutions Cluster Objectives To support and strengthen national and district capacity to timely detect and respond to health emergencies To improve access and coverage of high impact and life-saving child health interventions for all children under-five To increase availability of RH services so as to improve utilization of sexual and RH services To improve access to HIV/AIDS services To support districts in the control of the major neglected tropical diseases To support and strengthen national and district capacity for improved coordination Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Completeness and timeliness of IDSR reports 80% 90% DPT3 coverage 90% 25% Case fatality rates of disease outbreaks HEV <2% HEV 3.25% (Kabong) Cholera <1% Cholera 4.3% (Moroto) Proportion of pregnant mother tested for HIV 80% 22.8% Proportion of pregnant mothers positive to HIV receiving 100% 88% ART Proportion of people with advanced AIDS started on ART 47% 1.1% Proportion of pregnant mothers receiving IPT2 80% 64% Proportion of institutional deliveries 50% 22% Proportion of planned meetings conducted 80% 50%

17 UGANDA

Nutrition

Cluster Lead Agency UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND (UNICEF) Karamoja region: WFP, WHO, ACF, CONCERN Worldwide, Médecins sans Frontières (MSF), CESVI, Matany Hospital, Kaabong Hospital, Moroto Hospital, Abim Hospital, Kotido HCIV, Kotido CoU HCIV. Member organizations Acholi region: WFP, WHO, AAH, International Medical Corps (IMC), Gulu Hospital, Lacor Hospital, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Kalongo Hospital Teso region: WFP, Soroti Hospital. Health Need Uganda, KOKA, Uganda Women’s Effort to Save Orphans (UWESO) Number of Projects Eight projects Karamoja: 7,500 severely malnourished children, 35,000 moderately malnourished children, 216,767 children and their caregivers (prevention), 1,057,400 (whole population) to benefit from nutrition surveillance Acholi: 3,800 severely malnourished children, 19,000 moderately Beneficiaries malnourished, 314,760 children and their caregivers targeted for prevention. 1,464,000 (whole population) to benefit from nutrition surveillance Teso: 500 severely malnourished children, 3,600 moderately malnourished, 109,048 children and their caregivers targeted for prevention Funds Requested $7,548,523 changed from $7,351,725 Funds Requested per Priority Priority A – $6,023,525 changed from $5,446,672 Level Priority B – $1,524,998 changed from $1,905,053 Tanya Khara, [email protected], Contact Information Claudia Hudspeth, [email protected]

ACHOLI REGION Strategic Objective 1: Provision of basic services for the detection, referral and treatment of acutely malnourished children Cluster Objective Improve nutritional well-being of children in Acholi region Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of severely and moderately 3,800 severely and 1,438 children with SAM have been malnourished children treated 19,000 moderately treated (487 of these children benefited from WFP food rations in phase 2) 12,955 - MAM children with MAM treated NB: data up to April 2010 Percentage of malnourished children who are 60% 38% (1,438) of the 3,800 children identified and treated with SAM targeted 68% (12,955) of the 19,000 children with MAM targeted Percentage of cured, death, and default rates 75% cured, <10% Programme performance: of feeding programmes death, <15% default Therapeutic feeding centres (TFCs): rates of feeding Cure rate 90.2%; Default=6.5%; programmes Death = 6.6% OTC: Cure rate = 86.1%; Default = 16.6% and Death = 0.4%

Supplementary feeding centres (SFCs): 86.3% Cure rate, 0% Death rate, and 12.7% Default rate Percentage of health workers who are in all 50% 43% of health staff are trained in HCIIIs and above trained on the IMAM management of acute malnutrition Percentage of village health teams (VHTs) 80% 45% of VHT are involved in who are involved in community screening screening and nutrition promotion and nutrition promotion Percentage of caregivers who are of 80% Infant and Young Child Feeding adequate nutrition practices at household (IYCF) and IMAM messages passed level on by VHT to household level. However, a KAP survey is recommended to ascertain figure Percentage of GAM emergency threshold % GAM <10% GAM 6.4%, SAM 1.4% and SAM Emergency threshold and 0% SAM

18 UGANDA

Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for nutrition emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Build capacity of communities and district local government staff to effectively monitor the nutrition situation for improved coordination, preparedness and response to nutrition emergencies Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of health workers trained and 50 20 health workers have implementing the nutrition surveillance system knowledge and skill in implementing nutrition surveys Functional nutrition surveillance system in Acholi Minimum of three data Currently, preparations to with regular nutrition data collection rounds in the commence small-scale year population-based nutrition surveillance in progress Percentage of planned monthly coordination 100% 50%. One regional meeting meetings held conducted in last quarter. One Regional Technical working group meeting conducted in last quarter to institute monthly meetings in respective districts

TESO REGION Strategic Objective 1: Provision of basic services for the detection, referral and treatment of acutely malnourished children Cluster Objectives Improve nutritional well-being of children in Teso (Katakwi and Amuria) Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of severely and moderately 500 severely and 3,600 Only ITC data available. (40 malnourished children treated moderately treated for SAM)

Currently there are no outpatient therapeutic care (OTC) data. SFPs supported in these two districts Percentage of malnourished children who are 60% 8% SAM (coverage very low) identified and treated Percentage of cured, death, and default rates of 75% cured, <10% death, ITC: Cure rate 72%, death rate feeding programmes <15% default rates of 18% and defaulter rate 6% feeding programmes Percentage of VHTs who are involved in 40% Not documented community screening and nutrition promotion Percentage of caregivers who are of adequate 40% % cannot be easily established nutrition practices at household level without a KAP SAM 0% GAM 10% (August 2009)

KARAMOJA REGION Strategic Objective 1: Provision of basic services for the detection, referral and treatment of acutely malnourished children Cluster Objective: Improve nutritional well-being of children in Karamoja region Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of severely and moderately 7,500 severely and 1,053 treated -This data does malnourished children treated 35,000 moderately not include march data for Kotido and Abim districts

Out of these 608 children in the ITC benefited from the WFP food rations in phase 2 of management 27,560 MAM cases treated Percentage of malnourished children who are 60% 29.4% SAM (1,053 out of the identified and treated 7500) and 79% MAM (27,560 out of the 35,000) Percentage of cured, death, and default rates of 75% cured, <10% death, 62% cured, 1.7% death, feeding programmes <15% default rates of 14.4% defaulter rates feeding programmes

19 UGANDA

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of health workers who are in all 50% Average 35% HCIIIs and above trained on the management of acute malnutrition Percentage of VHTs who are involved in 80% Average 50% community screening and nutrition promotion Percentage of caregivers who are of adequate 60% 50% (these were sensitized on nutrition practices at household level key nutrition practices). However, this is difficult to measure without a KAP survey Percentage of GAM emergency threshold and GAM <10% Emergency 10.1% GAM, 2.1% SAM (Dec, SA threshold and 0% SAM 2009) Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for nutrition emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Build capacity of communities and District Local Government staff to effectively monitor the nutrition situation for improved coordination, preparedness and response to nutrition emergencies Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of additional health workers trained and 50 No additional health worker implementing the nutrition surveillance system trained during the quarter. The previous team (100) has been maintained and strengthened to conduct the next round of surveillance in May 2010 Functional nutrition surveillance system in Minimum of three data During the quarter, no round of Karamoja with regular nutrition data (minimum of collection rounds in the surveillance was done. three rounds in the year) year Second round planned in May 2010 Percentage of planned monthly coordination 100% 100%. one quarterly Nutrition meetings held Technical Working Group meeting held in Moroto in Jan 2010, one quarterly Health and Nutrition Coordination held in March 2010 and monthly Health & Nutrition HIV Sectors Groups in each district

20 UGANDA

Protection

OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR Cluster Lead REFUGEES (UNHCR) Acholi Region: ARC, FAO, Northern Uganda Malaria, AIDS and tuberculosis (TB) (NUMAT) UNFPA UNHCR, OHCHR, UNICEF, Gulu Support the Children Organization (GUSCO), Kitgum Concerned Women's Association (KICWA), SCiUG, WCH, WC-UK, Youth Social Work Association (YSA), Concerned Parents’ Association (CPA), Caritas Social Services and Development (SSD) (Catholic Diocese) IRC, DRC, Associazione Volontari per Il Servizio Internationale (AVSI), NRC, Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC), TPO, ASB, German Development Service (DED), Building Resources Across Communities (BRAC), GOAL

Member organizations Teso Region: ARC, ASB, FAO, NUMAT and UNFPA, UNICEF, SCiUG, WCH, War Child-UK, YSA, CPA, Caritas SSD (Catholic Diocese) IRC, UHRC, OHCHR, TPO

Karamoja Region: KADP, Matheniko Development forum (MADEFO), Action for Poverty Reduction & Livestock Modernization in Karamoja (ARELIMOK), Kotido Peace Initiative-Interfaith (KOPEIN), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), UNICEF, OHCHR, C&D, SCiUG, FAO, UHRC

Bunyoro Region: UNHCR; West Nile Region (Adjumani): UNHCR, DED and DRC Number of Projects 16 Projects 1,422,300 in camps, transit sites and in villages of origin who continue to require protection, assistance and support to achieve a sustainable durable Beneficiaries solution, of which child protection = 180,000 children in Acholi, Teso and Karamoja Funds Requested $16,198,875 changed from $16,896,515 Funds Requested per Priority Priority A – $15,577,875 changed from $16,275,515 Level Priority B – $621,000 Contact Information Jeddy Namfua, [email protected]; Carolyne Akello, [email protected]

ACHOLI REGION Strategic Objective 1: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three durable solutions Cluster Objectives To facilitate camp phase-out and support PSN/EVIS to achieve durable solutions Ensure timely identification, adequate support and protection measures for extremely vulnerable children To enhance the protection of populations affected by violence achieve a sustainable culture of respect for and institutional commitment to human rights; contribute to reducing impunity for human rights violations To enhance the protection of populations affected by violence achieve a sustainable culture of respect for and institutional commitment to human rights; contribute to reducing impunity for human rights violations To facilitate access to emergency post-rape care for GBV survivors To reduce vulnerability to SGBV for identified women and children through increased food and livelihoods support Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of PSN/EVIs supported to achieve 4,500 1,606 shelters, 767 of which include durable solution latrines Number of camps closed/ transformed into 102 closed 65 closed (64%) viable communities Percentage of rape survivors who report and are 100% 40% (20% lower than 2009) eligible for PEP accessing post rape services Percentage of vulnerable women and girls who 100% 44% benefit from livelihoods support Number of extremely vulnerable children 100% Response rate = 62% (boys/girls) identified and number of children Identified = 4,792 (2,391 boys & 2,401 supported by child protection community-based girls) interventions at sub-county level Assisted= 2,994 (1,002 boys, 1,992 girls)

21 UGANDA

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Improved capacity of state actors to respect Progress in reduction of case backlog human rights of right holders and effective Ongoing challenges linked to access to response to incidents of human rights violations and effective administration of justice, law and order: Police services face challenges relating to inadequate coverage of outposts, human and material resource constraints and effective undertaking of duties; Prison services face overcrowding, lengthy remand periods, and access to food, water and sanitation; whilst Local Council Courts remain inaccessible to extremely vulnerable parties in land dispute cases Improved human rights awareness by right Human rights training and capacity- holders building support have been provided. Systematic performance monitoring and evaluation needed to assess their impact and to ascertain critical gaps impacting on the ability of rights holders to effectively discharge responsibilities relating to access to and the administration of justice, law & order Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective To strengthen district capacity to address emergency protection concerns and violations Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year District capacity to address emergency Concerns over police coverage, protection concerns and violations is accessibility and effectiveness remain. strengthened Ongoing work is needed to address critical capacity and performance gaps, rebuild confidence in the police among communities, and address cases of mob justice Improved human rights awareness by right Noticeable progress since UHRC holders reinforced regional and mobile operations in some districts. However, concerns remain around intra-regional capacity disparities and future sustainability of operations

TESO REGION Strategic Objective 1: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three durable solutions Cluster Objectives To facilitate camp phase-out and support PSN/EVIS to achieve durable solutions Ensure timely identification, adequate support and protection measures for extremely vulnerable children To enhance the protection of populations affected by violence achieve a sustainable culture of respect for and institutional commitment to human rights; contribute to reducing impunity for human rights violations; and generating a heightened sense of accountability and justice To facilitate access to emergency post-rape care for GBV survivors To reduce vulnerability to SGBV for identified women and children through increased food and livelihoods support Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of PSN/EVIs supported to achieve 831 263 durable solutions Number of camps closed/ transformed into 61 60 camps closed (98%) viable communities Number of extremely vulnerable children (boys Response rate = 31% /girls) identified and supported by child Identified 5,628 (2469 boys, 3,159 girls) protection community-based interventions at Assisted 1,764 (921 boys and 843 girls) sub-county level

22 UGANDA

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of rape survivors who report and are 100% 10% eligible for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) accessing post-rape services Percentage of vulnerable women and girls 100% No data reported - nearly all livelihoods benefiting from livelihoods support interventions not implemented for want of funding Improved capacity of state actors to respect Low to moderate capacity of state actors human rights of right holders and respond to respond to human rights violations, effectively to human rights violations. Improved particularly with respect to the protection human rights awareness by rights holders of land rights of extremely vulnerable people. Concerns remain over arbitrary detention, torture, cruel treatment of suspects as well as detention of juveniles alongside adults in police posts Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective To strengthen district capacity to address emergency protection concerns and violations Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year District capacity to address emergency Sector /district coordination mechanisms protection concerns and violations is (DDMC & Database Coordination strengthened Committee [DCC]) are active in the context of emergencies. Human Rights major gaps in consultation of affected communities to design emergency protection responses

In addition, Internal district capacity, (human resources) is inadequate and requires dedicated capacity to fill in gaps left by UN and NGO humanitarian withdrawal

KARAMOJA REGION Strategic Objective 1: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three durable solutions Cluster Objectives Strengthen capacities at community level to address child protection and gender-based violations and hazardous coping strategies resulting from insecurity and livelihoods shocks To enhance the protection of populations affected by violence achieve a sustainable culture of respect for and institutional commitment to human rights; contribute to reducing impunity for human rights violations; and generating a heightened sense of accountability and justice Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of rape survivors who report and are 100% 10% eligible for PEP accessing post-rape services Percentage of vulnerable women and girls who 100% 20% benefit from livelihoods support Number of extremely vulnerable children (boys Identified 1,904 (827 boys and 1,077 girls) identified and supported by child girls) protection community based interventions at Assisted 1,740 (663 boys, 1,077girls) sub-county level Response rate = 91% Improved capacity of state actors to respect Gradual improvement in human rights human rights of right holders and respond response by police and UPDF. However, effectively to incidents of human rights violations with respect to GBV case response, police investigations are slow, survivors are not given access to PF3 forms, nor are they able to access recognized medical personnel Improved human rights awareness by right Limited knowledge about human rights holders among rights holders. More emphasis to be put on community sensitization and policing to empower and enable communities to assert their rights through reporting of violations and pursuit of appropriate remedies

23 UGANDA

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of reported cases of human rights Noted increased in response rate: of violations related to the disarmament process reported cases of human rights violations with an effective response to victims by the related to the disarmament exercise, 25% UHRC and UPDF (30 cases) received an effective response from UHRC & UPDF Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective To strengthen district capacity to address emergency protection concerns and violations Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year District capacity to address emergency Police capacity (resources and protection concerns and violations is knowledge) in incorporating human rights strengthened based approach to emergencies is weak, needs strengthening; particularly in instances of investigations and interventions to protect community, especially victims of GBV. Referral pathways are non-existent or non- functional for victims /survivors of GBV and others in need of medical emergencies services.

Sector /district coordination mechanisms (DDMC & DCC) are existent but preparedness is weak

BUNYORO REGION Strategic Objective: Supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three Durable Solutions Cluster Objective To support PSN/EVI to achieve sustainable durable solutions Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of PSN/EVIs supported to achieve Eight community outreaches on land durable solutions matters and durable solution were jointly undertaken with the local authorities. Mapping of basic services illustrate gaps in service provision. Advocacy is ongoing to support local integration of the formerly displaced. The challenges in Bunyoro exist in the absence of humanitarian and development actors

ADJUMANI- WEST NILE REGION Strategic Objective: Supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three durable solutions Cluster Objective To facilitate camp phase-out and support PSN/EVIs to achieve sustainable durable solutions Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of PSN/EVIs supported to achieve 82 Identification of PSN/EVIs was durable solutions undertaken. So far, 82 PSN/EVIs have been identified for support with shelter. Community mobilization and procurement of building materials are on going. Number of camps closed/ transformed into 8 UNHCR-DRC propose to empower the viable communities district on camp phase out activities targeting the eight camps

24 UGANDA

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)

Cluster Lead UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND (UNICEF) COOPI, AVSI, ACF, ZOA, WV, UNICEF, CW, CESVI, SP, C&D, GOAL, Member Organizations OXFAM & OCHA Number of Projects 17 Projects Acholi: 550,000 (270,050 male and 279,950 female) Beneficiaries Karamoja: 1,147,400 (585,000 male and 562,400 female) Teso: Total 80,000 (243,500 male and 263,700 female) Funds Requested $9,617,284 changed from $13,966,350 Funds Requested per Priority Priority A – $9,167,806 changed from $13,067,395 Level Priority B – 449,478 changed from $898,955 Chander Badloe: [email protected] and Stephen Wandera: Contact Information [email protected]

ACHOLI REGION Strategic Objective 1: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions fro achievements of the three Durable Solutions Cluster Objectives To improve the access to WASH services in IDP camps and areas of return To provide emergency WASH assistance to the extremely vulnerable population Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Average access to safe water in IDP camps and 15 l/p/d 15 l/p/d transit sites Percentage of population with access to safe water 65% Amuru 27%, Gulu 53%, Kitgum within 1.5 km in areas of return 61%, Pader 48% Percentage of population with access to household 10% increase Insufficient Data latrines in areas of return over 2009 level Pupil-to-latrine-stance ratio in primary schools 10% reduction Between 94:1 and 50:1 from 2009 Percentage of water facilities with functional water and 10% increase 95% water points with constituted sanitation committees from 2009 committees, but their functionality is at only 50% Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Strengthen local capacity for WASH emergency preparedness and response, and O&M by various actors Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of districts with functional District Water and 4 4. Poor functionality Sanitation Coordination Committee (DWSCCs) Number of districts with emergency preparedness 4 4 plans with completed WASH components Number of districts with functional systems for O&M of 4 4. Supply chain poor water facilities Percentage of sub-counties with fully trained, 100% 100% equipped and functional hand pump mechanics

TESO REGION Strategic Objective: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three Durable Solutions Cluster Objectives Improve access to and management of water, sanitation and hygiene services in IDP camps and areas of return Provide emergency assistance to the extremely vulnerable population Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of population with access to safe water 65% More than 75%. There are equity within 1.5 km in areas of return problems within the districts. Percentage of population with access to household 10% increase Amuria 62% (target achieved), latrine in areas of return of return over 2009 level Katakwi 48% (target not achieved) Pupil to latrine stance ratio in primary schools 10% reduction Amuria 79:1, Katakwi 65:1. Under from 2009 achieved Percentage of water facilities with functional water and 10% increase Data not available sanitation committees from 2009

25 UGANDA

Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Strengthen local capacity for WASH emergency preparedness and response, and O&M by various actors Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of districts with functional DWSCCs – target 2 2 all (2) Number of districts with Emergency Preparedness 2 1 (for Amuria) Plans with completed WASH components Number of districts with Emergency Preparedness 2 O&M institutional frame work Plans with completed WASH components established, but poor Number of districts with functional systems for O&M of 2 100% water facilities Percentage of sub-counties with fully trained, 100% 2 equipped and functional hand pump mechanics

KARAMOJA REGION Strategic Objective 1: To supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, respect and promote human rights and plan appropriate development strategies Cluster Objective Improve access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene among the extremely vulnerable communities Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of population with access to safe water 65% 26.4% Kaabong, 45% Kotido, 74% within 1.5 km Abim, 69% Moroto Percentage of population with access to household 10% increase Only 10% with access. Target not latrine over 2009 level yet achieved Pupil to latrine stance ratio in primary schools 10% reduction 69:1 Kaabong, 47:1 Kotido, 49:1 from 2009 Abim, 54:1 Moroto, 61:1 Nakapiripirit. Mixed achievement Percentage of water facilities with functional water and 10% increase Functionality below 70% sanitation committees from 2009 Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective Strengthen local capacity for WASH emergency preparedness and response, and O&M by various actors Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of districts with functional DWSCCs 5 Five, but with weak functionality Number of districts with Emergency Preparedness 5 Five. All in draft form Plans with completed WASH components Number of districts with functional systems for O&M of 5 Five. Poor supply chain water facilities Percentage of sub-counties with fully trained, 100% 100% - well trained, equipped and equipped and functional hand pump mechanics functional

26 UGANDA

Refugees

Lead Agency OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) Member Organizations Aktion Africa Hilfe (AAH), DED, OPM Kampala, Adjumani, Arua, Adjumani (OPM), District Local Government (AJDLG), African Humanitarian Action (AHA), African Development and Emergency Organization (ADEO), African Initiative for Relief & Development (AIRD), Youth Anti Aids Service Association (YAASA), Arua District Local Government (ADLG), Yumbe District Local Government (YDLG), Windle Trust Uganda (WTU), Masindi District Local Government (MASDLG), Ministry of Works and Transport (MoWT), German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) Number of Projects Six Projects Beneficiaries 143,352 refugees and asylum-seekers* Funds Requested $65,910,683 changed from $66,598,667 Funds Requested per Priority Priority A – $45,875,763 changed from $46,563,747 Level Priority B – $20,034,920 Contact Information Iftikar Majumder: [email protected] *Population of Concern to UNHCR.

WEST NILE AND OTHER REFUGEE-HOSTING DISTRICTS Strategic Objective 1: Supplement government efforts to provide basic services that save lives and alleviate suffering, as the basis for creating the conditions for achievement of the three durable solutions Cluster Objectives To ensure protection for all refugees and asylum-seekers, facilitate and promote durable solutions To monitor socio-economic rights of refugees with focus on health education, water and sanitation and gender issues To mitigate the effects of economic hardship and lack of social amenities to the urban refugee population Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of refugees are registered and 100% 100% updated Government supported in provision of protection 100% 80% and assistance in accordance with international and national laws Percentage of PSNs, older people, women, 100% 60% children and disabled people provided with required specialized services for improved independence Number of refugees that have successfully been 100% Voluntary repatriation= 1798 (1,689 provided with durable solutions Sudanese, 109 Kenyans) Resettlement= 350 Percentage of refugees have access to sufficient 100% 70% basic and social services (health, security, sanitation, education, shelter, etc) as well as livelihood requirements Number of refugees with access to at least nine 100% 100% litres of safe clean water per person per day Number of unaccompanied minors (UAMs) 100% Identified= 341 identified, supported and reunified with family Reunified= 9 members Strategic Objective 2: To contribute to the strengthening of district capacity for emergency preparedness and response Cluster Objective: To respond to new influx of refugees and asylum-seekers timely and effectively Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Percentage of asylum seekers accepted as 100% 85% refugees are registered and receive protection/ material assistance in a coordinated and timely manner Percentage of cases of refoulement 0% 0% Percentage of refugee arrivals have and are 100% 80% provided with access to basic services - health, nutrition, education, sanitation, clean water supplies

27 UGANDA

Indicator Target Achieved as of mid-year Number of PSNs, elderly, disabled people etc 100% 70% (108 PSNs identified) identified and have access to protection and other specialized services Number of local communities sensitized and 100% 80% supported on the presence and community support to the arrivals Number of facilities and related infrastructure 100% In Kisoro: One primary school, two constructed, maintained and equipped to address communal centres, four latrines & the refugee influx - temporary shelters, reception two bath stalls maintained. One centres, office blocks, schools, health facilities, 10,000 lt water tank renovated. water sources etc Nyakabande Health Centre II: provided with fridge for vaccine storage and an assortment of drugs. One Bridge (point of entry for asylum-seekers from eastern DRC) constructed and handed over to the district. Coordinate the development of an inter-agency 100% UNHCR closely monitoring regional contingency plan to respond to refugee influxes developments in the event of a refugee influx. UNHCR Uganda finalizing a draft Contingency Plan for South Sudan in consultation and coordination with the Government of Uganda and other UN humanitarian agencies

28 UGANDA

4. FORWARD VIEW

At the time of the Mid-Year Review, the humanitarian community – UN, NGOs, donors and the government of Uganda – are considering if a CAP is required for 2011. As all who have watched the humanitarian operations in Uganda are aware, CAPs in recent years have been steadily decreasing in an effort to 'right-size' the humanitarian endeavour in a clear environment of transition from humanitarian to recovery and development.

To a great extent, the need of a CAP in 2011 will be measured against the accomplishment of CAP goals in 2010. Of particular concern is that the approximately 200,000 EVIs within camps find opportunity for 'durable solutions'. But in one sense the greater concern is that those 1.4 million IDPs who have left camps have indeed opportunity of durable solutions as well. Herein, the level of basic service provision in water, health and education is yet to achieve a level that constitutes a peace dividend, subsequent to the Juba Peace Process and the absence of the LRA in Uganda. Funding for the priority A projects in the CAP at least is crucial to have any chance of decent accomplishment of the CAP goals in 2010.

The humanitarian community in the third quarter of 2010 will undertake a two-step Durable Solutions assessment of IDPs against the eight measurements outlined in the Durable Solutions Framework. The first step will be to take measure of what is the status of durable solutions of the IDPs and what remains to be accomplished. The second step shall be undertaken some 6-9 months later whereupon the actions found necessary in the first step will be measured for accomplishment. It is important to note that while IDP camps maybe closed and the humanitarian effort may formally conclude in broad terms, the completion and consolidation of durable solutions occurs under the auspices of the Government of Uganda and development donors who seek to remove lingering impacts of having been an IDP among those 1.6 million who have suffered over such a long period of time.

The dynamics of South Sudan in the coming 12 months present Uganda with prudent questions of preparation for possible humanitarian consequences which may affect Uganda. Under the Humanitarian Coordinator and led by UNHCR, the humanitarian community in Uganda will soon conduct a contingency planning exercise which will be based upon an analysis and forecast provided by colleagues in South Sudan. The result will be a clear contingency plan that outlines the need of a series of contingency plan preparation projects which shall be inserted into this Uganda CAP in 2010.

The Humanitarian Coordinator and HCT will make a final decision on whether or not there shall be a CAP in 2011 in their July 2010 meeting. A formal note on the decision will be communicated to donors in Kampala, Geneva and New York in due course.

Looking forward – early planning for the 2011 CAP: Nothing planned

29 UGANDA

ANNEX I: LIST OF PROJECTS AND FUNDING TABLES

Table IV: List of Appeal projects (grouped by cluster), with funding status of each Table IV: List of Appeal projects (grouped by cluster), with funding status of each Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.

Project code (click on Title Appealing Original Revised Funding Unmet % Uncommitted Priority Location hyperlinked project code to agency requirements requirements requirements Covered pledges open full project details) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)

COORDINATION

MULTI UGA-10/CSS/28903/R/119 Humanitarian Coordination and Advocacy in Uganda OCHA 2,678,159 2,370,305 2,496,002 - 125,697 105% - Priority A REGION

Sub total for COORDINATION 2,678,159 2,370,305 2,496,002 - 125,697 105% -

EDUCATION

UGA-10/E/29298/R/124 Restoration of Primary Education in North Eastern Uganda UNICEF 1,911,645 955,822 - 955,822 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA

Sub total for EDUCATION 1,911,645 955,822 - 955,822 0% -

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE

Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) UGA-10/CSS/26825/R/122 WHO 725,032 725,032 - 725,032 0% - Priority C ACHOLI and epidemic disease surveillance in Acholi sub-region Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) UGA-10/CSS/26825/R/124 UNICEF 387,100 139,100 - 139,100 0% - Priority C ACHOLI and epidemic disease surveillance in Acholi sub-region Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) UGA-10/CSS/26838/R/122 WHO 506,110 506,110 - 506,110 0% - Priority C TESO and epidemic disease surveillance in Teso sub-region Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) UGA-10/CSS/26838/R/124 UNICEF 80,645 53,500 - 53,500 0% - Priority C TESO and epidemic disease surveillance in Teso sub-region Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) UGA-10/CSS/26851/R/122 WHO 612,000 612,000 - 612,000 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA and epidemic disease surveillance In Karamoja sub-region Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) UGA-10/CSS/26851/R/124 UNICEF 462,365 288,900 - 288,900 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA and epidemic disease surveillance In Karamoja sub-region Mitigating impact of floods for vulnerable Agro-Pastoral UGA-10/CSS/27910/R/13056 MADEFO 590,000 590,000 - 590,000 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA communities in Matheniko County. Enhancing Community Managed Disaster Risk Reduction UGA-10/CSS/27915/13056 for the agro-pastoral communities in Moroto, Nakapiriprit, MADEFO 887,000 887,000 - 887,000 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA and Amudat Disttricts

30 UGANDA

Strengthening disaster preparedness capacity for local UGA-10/CSS/29276/5120 OXFAM GB 350,000 350,000 - 350,000 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA authorities and communities in Karamoja region

UGA-10/CSS/29592/R/124 Establishing Rapid Life Saving Responses UNICEF 1,605,000 1,177,000 - 1,177,000 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA

Withdrawn - Equipping communities to save lives as first UGA-10/CSS/29619/R/124 UNICEF 845,300 - - - 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA responders

Sub total for EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE 7,050,552 5,328,642 - 5,328,642 0% -

FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURAL LIVELIHOODS

Community based Livelihood Support to Return Areas in UGA-10/A/26301/5181 DRC 996,000 996,000 - 996,000 0% - Priority B ACHOLI Northern Uganda (Gulu and Amuru districts) Community based Livelihood Support to Return Areas in UGA-10/A/26339/5181 DRC 775,250 775,250 - 775,250 0% - Priority A TESO Teso Region (Katakwi) Improving Food Security and Agricultural Livelihoods for UGA-10/A/26623/5144 Vulnerable Returnee Households in Gulu and Amuru CPAR 576,500 576,500 - 576,500 0% - Priority B ACHOLI Districst Food Security Intervention in Pader District, Northern UGA-10/A/26721/5167 COOPI 339,300 339,300 - 339,300 0% - Priority B ACHOLI Uganda Integrated food security and agricultural livelihoods project UGA-10/A/27312/5582 IAS 122,700 122,700 - 122,700 0% - Priority B ACHOLI for returning communities in Pader Enhancing Nutritional Security and Income Among 9,000 UGA-10/A/27686/5144 CPAR 1,575,437 1,575,437 - 1,575,437 0% - Priority B ACHOLI Vulnerable Households in Pader District Enabling self-reliance through improved food security, UGA-10/A/27723/5061 increased productivity, livelihood enhancement and ASB 285,000 285,000 - 285,000 0% - Priority B ACHOLI development of skills in Pader District Food Security and Agriculture livelihood intervention, UGA-10/A/27724/5582 IAS 121,100 121,100 - 121,100 0% - Priority A TESO Katakwi and Amuriia districts Enabling self-reliance through improved food security, UGA-10/A/27737/5061 increased productivity, livelihood enhancement and ASB 900,000 900,000 - 900,000 0% - Priority A TESO development of skills in Teso Region Emergency support for Basic Food Crop Production UGA-10/A/27796/5328 among Conflict, Drought and Flood affected households in Danchurchaid 402,264 402,264 - 402,264 0% - Priority A TESO Teso Region, Uganda Stimulating food production and basic economic livelihood UGA-10/A/27855/123 FAO 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0% - Priority B ACHOLI opportunities in resettlement areas of Acholi Emergency response contingency for farming communities UGA-10/A/27856/123 FAO 500,000 500,000 - 500,000 0% - Priority C ACHOLI in Acholi Food Security and Agricultural Livelihood cluster MULTI UGA-10/A/27857/123 FAO 350,000 350,000 - 350,000 0% - Priority B coordination REGION

31 UGANDA

UGA-10/A/27858/123 Stimulation of agropastoralist livelihoods in Karamoja FAO 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA

UGA-10/A/27860/123 Urgent response action to food insecurity in Karamoja FAO 2,500,000 2,500,000 280,112 2,219,888 11% - Priority B KARAMOJA

Increasing and enhancing food production and livelihood UGA-10/A/27879/8836 Restore Hope 289,500 289,500 - 289,500 0% - Priority A TESO to returning people in Katakwi and Amuria ZOA Refugee UGA-10/A/27979/5150 Promotion of food production in parishes of Pader 410,000 410,000 - 410,000 0% - Priority B ACHOLI Care ZOA Refugee UGA-10/A/28009/5150 Alleviation of Food Insecurity in Nakapiripirit District 955,510 955,510 - 955,510 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA Care Food security support for drought affected households in UGA-10/A/28024/5128 CESVI 421,000 421,000 - 421,000 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA Abim District (Karamoja region) Enhanced Livestock Productivity in Moroto and Samaritan's UGA-10/A/28055/6116 154,175 154,175 - 154,175 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA Nakapiripirit Districts Purse Enhanced Food Security and Agricultural Production Samaritan's UGA-10/A/28060/6116 173,571 173,571 - 173,571 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA Capacity in Moroto and Nakapiripirit Districts Purse

UGA-10/A/28068/6458 Develop farmer groups in Northern Uganda ACTED 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 0% - Priority B ACHOLI

UGA-10/A/28070/6458 Consolidation of the Drought EWS in Karamoja. ACTED 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 0% - Priority C KARAMOJA

Livelihood and Crop Diversification for Increased Food UGA-10/A/28071/6458 ACTED 400,000 400,000 - 400,000 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA Security in Nakapiripirit District Enhancement of sustainable livelihoods in Karamoja UGA-10/A/28139/7987 C&D 720,000 720,000 - 720,000 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA region Promotion of Nutrition in Farmer Field schools and UGA-10/A/28425/13096 JEEP 189,000 189,000 - 189,000 0% - Priority A TESO conventional schools. Stimulating food production and basic economic livelihood UGA-10/A/28869/123 opportunities in resettlement areas, and emergency FAO 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 0% - Priority A TESO response capacity in Teso.

UGA-10/A/29259/5120 Responding to Food Insecurity in Northern Uganda OXFAM GB 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,190,500 109,500 92% - Priority B ACHOLI

Improved livelihoods and economic base of the UGA-10/A/29280/5120 OXFAM GB 650,000 650,000 142,727 507,273 22% - Priority B KARAMOJA pastoralists in Karamoja Emergency livestock Supportive treatments, Vaccination UGA-10/A/29291/5654 VSF (Belgium) 788,205 788,205 - 788,205 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA and Feed supplementation Targeted Food Assistance for Food-Insecure Communities UGA-10/F/28335/R/561 WFP 33,329,614 31,345,463 12,016,791 19,328,672 38% - Priority B KARAMOJA in Karamoja Sub-region (EMOP)

32 UGANDA

Karamoja Emergency Food/Distribution for EVIs and Food UGA-10/F/28367/5328 Danchurchaid 780,000 780,000 - 780,000 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA Production Project Targeted Food Assistance for Relief of Extremely UGA-10/F/28426/561 Vulnerable Individuals in some areas of Acholi Sub-region WFP 11,456,986 11,456,986 5,611,874 5,845,112 49% - Priority B ACHOLI (PRRO 101213)

Sub total for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURAL LIVELIHOODS 67,911,112 65,926,961 19,242,004 46,684,957 29% -

HEALTH AND HIV/AIDS

Voluntary Counseling & Testing and Outreach services in UGA-10/H/26321/7529 VIA 268,000 268,000 - 268,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Gulu and Kitgum Districts, Consolidating and strengthening Sexual and Reproductive UGA-10/H/26405/R/1171 Health and PMTCT services for IDPs and returning UNFPA 588,500 588,500 - 588,500 0% - Priority B ACHOLI populations in Acholi sub region Consolidating and strengthening Sexual and Reproductive UGA-10/H/26405/R/122 Health and PMTCT services for IDPs and returning WHO 609,900 304,500 - 304,500 0% - Priority B ACHOLI populations in Acholi sub region Consolidating and strengthening Sexual and Reproductive UGA-10/H/26405/R/124 Health and PMTCT services for IDPs and returning UNICEF 529,650 353,000 - 353,000 0% - Priority B ACHOLI populations in Acholi sub region Strengthening Sexual and Reproductive Health and UGA-10/H/26406/R/1171 PMTCT services for conflict affected populations in UNFPA 535,000 535,000 - 535,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Karamoja region Strengthening Sexual and Reproductive Health and UGA-10/H/26406/R/122 PMTCT services for conflict affected populations in WHO 909,500 454,750 - 454,750 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Karamoja region Strengthening Sexual and Reproductive Health and UGA-10/H/26406/R/124 PMTCT services for conflict affected populations in UNICEF 998,000 530,000 - 530,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Karamoja region Provision of Mental Health, Neurological and Substance UGA-10/H/26822/R/122 WHO 306,020 306,020 - 306,020 0% - Priority A ACHOLI abuse services and Psychosocial Support Health and HIV/AIDS Response Coordination in Acholi UGA-10/H/26870/R/122 WHO 1,071,070 1,071,070 - 1,071,070 0% - Priority A ACHOLI sub-region

UGA-10/H/26878/R/122 Health and HIV/AIDS Response Coordination in Karamoja WHO 647,350 647,350 - 647,350 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA

UGA-10/H/27425/6458 Health Infrastructure Enhancement for the Acholi Region. ACTED 420,000 420,000 - 420,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI

Improving safe motherhood and Reproductive Health UGA-10/H/28035/5128 CESVI 380,292 380,292 - 380,292 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Services in Abim District HIV Community Empowerment Project in Moroto and Samaritan's UGA-10/H/28062/6116 480,841 480,841 - 480,841 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Nakapiripirit Districts Purse

33 UGANDA

Strengthening tuberculosis (TB) services at the community Malaria UGA-10/H/28195/7607 and health facility levels in 3 Karamoja districts (Kotido, 739,450 739,450 - 739,450 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Consortium Kaabong, Abim)

UGA-10/H/28248/R/122 Child and New Born Health ( NE Uganda) WHO 554,260 328,300 - 328,300 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA

UGA-10/H/28248/R/124 Child and New Born Health ( NE Uganda) UNICEF 1,569,892 1,326,800 1,094,671 232,129 83% - Priority A KARAMOJA

Support to the control of Neglected tropical diseases UGA-10/H/28253/R/122 WHO 418,370 418,370 - 418,370 0% - Priority A ACHOLI (NTDs) Child and New Born Health ( North Uganda– population in UGA-10/H/28505/R/124 UNICEF 845,300 428,000 - 428,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI IDP camps) Child and New Born Health ( Two districts in Eastern UGA-10/H/28512/R/124 UNICEF 88,275 58,850 - 58,850 0% - Priority B TESO Uganda - Katakwi and Amuria) Increasing access to HIV care and treatment for adults and UGA-10/H/29669/R/122 WHO 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA children in Karamoja region Increasing access to HIV care and treatment for adults and UGA-10/H/29669/R/124 UNICEF 235,000 177,000 - 177,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA children in Karamoja region Increasing access to HIV care and treatment for adults and UGA-10/H/29670/R/122 WHO 240,000 240,000 - 240,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI children in Acholi region Increasing access to HIV care and treatment for adults and UGA-10/H/29670/R/124 UNICEF 235,000 235,000 - 235,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI children in Acholi region

Sub total for HEALTH AND HIV/AIDS 12,919,670 10,541,093 1,094,671 9,446,422 10% -

NUTRITION

Capacity Building of Health Systems in Karamoja Region UGA-10/H/26348/R/5186 ACF 851,550 1,203,350 562,852 640,498 47% - Priority A KARAMOJA on Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) Capacity Building of District Health Offices (DHOS in UGA-10/H/26369/R/5186 Karamoja on Sustainable Community-based Nutrition ACF 253,436 253,436 - 253,436 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Surveillance System

UGA-10/H/27509/8498 Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition in Karamoja CW 350,000 350,000 - 350,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA

Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) in UGA-10/H/28472/R/122 WHO 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Northern Eastern Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) in UGA-10/H/28472/R/124 UNICEF 1,578,250 1,421,989 1,421,989 - 100% - Priority A KARAMOJA Northern Eastern Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) in UGA-10/H/28472/R/561 WFP 300,000 1,070,000 524,108 545,892 49% - Priority A KARAMOJA Northern Eastern Uganda Nutrition Surveillance and Risk Reduction in North Eastern UGA-10/H/28490/R/124 UNICEF 477,748 477,748 535,631 - 57,883 112% - Priority B KARAMOJA Uganda

34 UGANDA

Nutrition Surveillance and Risk Reduction in North Eastern UGA-10/H/28490/R/561 WFP 280,000 280,000 137,150 142,850 49% - Priority B KARAMOJA Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) UGA-10/H/28493/R/122 WHO 100,000 - - - 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Northern Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) UGA-10/H/28493/R/124 UNICEF 796,936 508,250 645,172 - 136,922 127% - Priority A ACHOLI Northern Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) UGA-10/H/28493/R/561 WFP 1,116,500 1,116,500 546,885 569,615 49% - Priority A ACHOLI Northern Uganda Nutrition Surveillance and Risk Reduction in Northern UGA-10/H/28495/R/124 UNICEF 348,285 267,500 240,000 27,500 90% - Priority B ACHOLI Uganda Nutrition Surveillance and Risk Reduction in Northern UGA-10/H/28495/R/561 WFP 300,000 300,000 271,627 28,373 91% - Priority B ACHOLI Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) in UGA-10/H/28499/R/122 WHO - - - - 0% - Priority B TESO Eastern Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) in UGA-10/H/28499/R/124 UNICEF 199,020 133,750 - 133,750 0% - Priority B TESO Eastern Uganda Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition (IMAM) in UGA-10/H/28499/R/561 WFP 300,000 66,000 18,870 47,130 29% - Priority B TESO Eastern Uganda

Sub total for NUTRITION 7,351,725 7,548,523 4,904,284 2,644,239 65% -

PROTECTION

UGA-10/P-HR-RL/26097/R/120 Uganda IDPs’ Protection, Assistance & Durable Solutions UNHCR 9,702,896 9,702,896 10,123,812 - 420,916 104% - Priority A ACHOLI

UGA-10/P-HR-RL/26168/5768 Return Monitoring and EVIs Support in Gulu Districts AVSI - - - - 0% - Priority A ACHOLI

Responding to gender based violence in Teso subregion UGA-10/P-HR-RL/26966/1171 UNFPA 107,000 107,000 - 107,000 0% - Priority B TESO of Uganda Responding to gender based violence in Teso subregion UGA-10/P-HR-RL/26966/123 FAO 214,000 214,000 - 214,000 0% - Priority B TESO of Uganda Responding to gender-based violence in Karamoja - GBV UGA-10/P-HR-RL/27011/1171 UNFPA 214,000 214,000 - 214,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA subcluster Responding to gender-based violence in Karamoja - GBV UGA-10/P-HR-RL/27011/123 FAO 321,000 321,000 - 321,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA subcluster Protection of IDPs by supporting PSN/EVIs in achieving UGA-10/P-HR-RL/27742/5061 durable solutions and transforming former camps into ASB 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI viable communities in Pader District Protection of vulnerable women and children from UGA-10/P-HR-RL/27745/5061 Karamoja region (including Child Protection and Gender- ASB 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA based Violence)

35 UGANDA

Supporting PSN/EVIs in achieving durable solutions, transforming former camps into viable communities and UGA-10/P-HR-RL/27746/5061 ASB 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 0% - Priority B TESO ensuring protection of the most vulnerable (including Child Protection & Gender-based Violence) in Teso Region Safe Return and Reintegration of Children Associated with UGA-10/P-HR-RL/28445/R/124 UNICEF 888,100 532,860 - 532,860 0% - Priority A ACHOLI the Lord’s Resistance Army Care, Reintegration, Protection of Children forced to UGA-10/P-HR-RL/28449/R/124 UNICEF 856,000 513,600 - 513,600 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA migrate and live on streets Sustainable Returns through Protection, Referral UGA-10/P-HR-RL/28486/5181 DRC 200,000 200,000 - 200,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Pathways, and Basic Service Provision Prevention and Response to Sexual Gender Based UGA-10/P-HR-RL/28496/5160 Violence and Substance abuse in Acholi region. (GBV IMC 581,600 581,600 - 581,600 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Protection Cluster) Human Rights and Rule of Law: Assistance to north- UGA-10/P-HR-RL/28873/5025 eastern Uganda in the monitoring and reporting of human OHCHR 437,557 437,557 437,557 - 100% - Priority A KARAMOJA rights Responding to gender-based violence in Acholi sub region UGA-10/P-HR-RL/29196/1171 UNFPA 214,000 214,000 - 214,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI - GBV subcluster Responding to gender-based violence in Acholi sub region UGA-10/P-HR-RL/29196/123 FAO 321,000 321,000 - 321,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI - GBV subcluster Protection Monitoring of IDPs, Support to PSNs and Camp UGA-10/P-HR-RL/29258/7790 GOAL - - - - 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Phase Out in Pader District Direct Assistance to Stranded Congolese Irregular Migrant UGA-10/P-HR-RL/30757/298 Women and Children through Voluntary Repatriation & IOM 1,334,025 1,334,025 313,862 1,020,163 24% - Priority A ACHOLI Reintegration Support Direct Assistance to Stranded Congolese Irregular Migrant UGA-10/P-HR-RL/30758/298 Women and Children through Voluntary Repatriation & IOM 705,337 705,337 - 705,337 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA Reintegration Support

Sub total for PROTECTION 16,896,515 16,198,875 10,875,231 5,323,644 67% -

REFUGEES

Provision of Education Services to Refugee and host MULTI UGA-10/E/29300/R/124 UNICEF 583,150 306,902 - 306,902 0% - Priority A communities REGION Targeted Food Assistance for Food-Insecure Refugees in MULTI UGA-10/F/28330/561 WFP 20,034,920 20,034,920 10,063,527 9,971,393 50% - Priority B West Nile and South-western Uganda (PRRO 101213) REGION MULTI UGA-10/MS/26115/R/120 Protection of and Mixed Solutions for Refugees in Uganda UNHCR 39,669,757 39,669,757 1,880,267 37,789,490 5% - Priority A REGION MULTI UGA-10/MS/26118/120 Post repatriation, rehabilitation programme in Uganda UNHCR 5,121,000 5,121,000 241,874 4,879,126 5% - Priority A REGION

36 UGANDA

Emergency Child Protection Response to refugees influx MULTI UGA-10/P-HR-RL/28440/R/124 UNICEF 535,000 385,200 - 385,200 0% - Priority A in Uganda REGION Provision of Emergency Safe Water, Sanitation and MULTI UGA-10/WS/28465/R/124 UNICEF 654,840 392,904 - 392,904 0% - Priority A Hygiene Access During Refugee Influx in Uganda REGION

Sub total for REFUGEES 66,598,667 65,910,683 12,185,668 53,725,015 18% -

WATER AND SANITATION

UGA-10/WS/26352/R/5186 Response to and Mitigation of hepatitis E in Pader District ACF 925,392 462,696 - 462,696 0% - Priority A ACHOLI

WASH Support to Health/Nutritional Centers and UGA-10/WS/26376/R/5186 ACF 898,955 449,478 - 449,478 0% - Priority B KARAMOJA communities in Moroto and Kaabong Districts

Water and Sanitation Intervention in Pader District, UGA-10/WS/26757/5167 COOPI 239,500 239,500 - 239,500 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Northern Uganda

UGA-10/WS/26937/R/8502 Pader District Improved Health Project WVI 363,772 210,018 - 210,018 0% - Priority A ACHOLI

Environmental Health for Returning Communities in Pader UGA-10/WS/27492/8498 CW 425,000 425,000 418,437 6,563 98% - Priority A ACHOLI District Lifesaving water and sanitation in Schools and at Home in ZOA Refugee UGA-10/WS/27968/R/5150 263,755 158,253 - 158,253 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Pader Care

UGA-10/WS/28028/R/5128 Improving access to WATSAN facilities in Abim district CESVI 326,578 130,630 - 130,630 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA

Improved Access to Safe Water and Sanitation in Moroto Samaritan's UGA-10/WS/28066/R/6116 937,731 560,081 - 560,081 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA and Nakapiripirit Districts Purse Increasing vital access to water for human and livestock in UGA-10/WS/28158/R/7987 C&D 1,200,000 670,000 - 670,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA the most water-stricken areas in Karamoja Region Provision of Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Access in UGA-10/WS/28453/R/124 UNICEF 1,547,220 928,323 - 928,323 0% - Priority A ACHOLI Northern Region Providing Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Access in UGA-10/WS/28457/R/124 UNICEF 1,506,025 903,615 719,088 184,527 80% - Priority A KARAMOJA North Eastern Uganda Provision of Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Access in UGA-10/WS/28463/R/124 UNICEF 501,830 301,098 - 301,098 0% - Priority A TESO Eastern Region Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Project, Abim District, UGA-10/WS/29252/7790 GOAL 812,000 812,000 404,551 407,449 50% - Priority A KARAMOJA Karamoja Region Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Project, Pader District, UGA-10/WS/29253/7790 GOAL 1,182,992 1,182,992 925,009 257,983 78% - Priority A ACHOLI Northern Uganda Improved access to water and sanitation services in return UGA-10/WS/29254/R/5768 AVSI 1,000,000 600,000 - 600,000 0% - Priority A ACHOLI areas and schools in northern Uganda Integrated Public Health assistance for conflict affected UGA-10/WS/29256/5120 OXFAM GB 1,205,600 1,205,600 870,000 335,600 72% - Priority A ACHOLI populations in Kitgum District, Northern Uganda

37 UGANDA

Supporting access to clean water, basic hygiene practices UGA-10/WS/29278/R/5120 and water for production as a strategy to improving OXFAM GB 630,000 378,000 - 378,000 0% - Priority A KARAMOJA people’s health and hygiene in North Karamoja

Sub total for WATER AND SANITATION 13,966,350 9,617,284 3,337,085 6,280,199 35% -

CLUSTER NOT SPECIFIED

Uganda Emergency Response Fund (projected needs MULTI UGA-10/SNYS/28994/8487 ERF (OCHA) - - 865,725 n/a n/a - Priority C $1,070,000) REGION PRIORITY Not UGA-10/SNYS/32330/R/120 Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector UNHCR - - 530,504 n/a n/a - NOT Specified SPECIFIED PRIORITY Not UGA-10/SNYS/32438/R/122 Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector WHO - - 1,475,948 n/a n/a - NOT Specified SPECIFIED PRIORITY Not UGA-10/SNYS/32474/R/1171 Awaiting allocation to specific project/sector UNFPA - - 536,641 n/a n/a - NOT Specified SPECIFIED

Sub total for CLUSTER NOT SPECIFIED - - 3,408,818 n/a n/a -

Grand Total 197,284,395 184,398,188 57,543,763 126,854,425 31% -

NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments

38 UGANDA

Table V: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by location)

Table V: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by location) Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.

Uncom- Original Revised Unmet % Location Funding mitted requirements requirements requirements Covered pledges ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) A B C B-C C/B D ACHOLI 49,712,438 45,999,52821,157,178 24,842,350 46% -

KARAMOJA 70,971,137 63,350,250 18,277,227 45,073,023 29% -

MULTI REGION 69,626,826 68,630,988 15,547,395 53,083,593 23% -

TESO 6,973,994 6,417,42218,870 6,398,552 0% -

Not Specified - - 2,543,093 n/a n/a -

Grand Total 197,284,395 184,398,188 57,543,763 126,854,425 31% -

NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments

39 UGANDA

Table VI: Total funding per donor (to projects listed in the Appeal)

Table VI: Total funding per donor (to projects listed in the Appeal) Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. % of Grand Uncommitted Donor Funding Total pledges ($) ($) Carry-over (donors not specified) 23,871,844 41% - European Commission (ECHO) 11,157,066 19% - Spain 7,867,812 14% - United Kingdom 5,952,000 10% - Japan 2,500,000 4% - Sweden 1,819,468 3% - Norway 986,071 2% - Finland 944,669 2% - Ireland 744,551 1% - Canada 675,422 1% - Austria 530,504 1% - Private (individuals & organisations) 250,000 0% - Netherlands 237,762 0% - Allocations of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 6,594 0% - Grand Total 57,543,763 100 % -

NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments

40 UGANDA

Table VII: Total humanitarian assistance per donor (Appeal plus other*)

Table VII: Total humanitarian assistance per donor (Appeal plus other*) Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. % of Grand Uncommitted Donor Funding Total pledges ($) ($) Carry-over (donors not specified) 23,871,844 38% - European Commission (ECHO) 15,332,389 25% 6,105,006 Spain 7,867,812 13% - United Kingdom 5,952,000 10% - Japan 2,500,000 4% - Sweden 1,924,975 3% - Norway 986,071 2% - Finland 944,669 2% - Ireland 744,551 1% - Canada 675,422 1% - Austria 530,504 1% - Private (individuals & organisations) 250,000 0% - Netherlands 237,762 0% - Australia 179,212 0% - Italy 119,973 0% - Czech Republic 97,166 0% - United States 15,000 0% - Allocations of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 6,594 0% - Grand Total: 62,235,944 100 % 6,105,006

NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments

* Includes contributions to the Consolidated Appeal and additional contributions outside of the Consolidated Appeal Process (bilateral, Red Cross, etc.)

41 UGANDA

Table VIII: Summary of funding to projects not listed in the Appeal

Table VIII: Summary of funding to projects not listed in the Appeal Other humanitarian funding to Uganda 2010 as of 25 June 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. % of Grand Uncommitted Recipient Funding Total pledges ($) ($) NRC 1,326,260 28% - ACF - Spain 1,223,389 26% - Netherlands RC 928,623 20% - IRC 697,051 15% - UNICEF 179,212 4% - IFRC 119,973 3% - MSB 105,507 2% - NGOs 97,166 2% - Global H20 15,000 0% - UN Agencies, NGOs and Red Cross - 0% 6,105,006 Grand Total 4,692,181 100% 6,105,006

NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments

42 UGANDA

ANNEX II: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AAH Aktion Africa Hilfe ACDI/VOCA Agricultural Cooperative Development International / Volunteers in Overseas Cooperative Assistance ACF Action Contre la Faim ACTED Agency for Cooperation and Technical Development ADEO African Development and Emergency Organization ADLG Arua District Local Government ADRA Adventist Development and Relief Agency AHA African Humanitarian Action AIDS acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome AIRD African Initiative for Relief and Development AJDLG District Local Government ARC American Refugee Committee ARELIMOK Action for Poverty Reduction and Livestock Modernization in Karamoja ART anti-retroviral therapy ARV anti-retrovirus ASB Arbeiter-Samariter-Bund AUPWAE Association of Uganda Professional Women in Agriculture and Environment AVSI Associazione Volontari per il Servizio Internazionale

BRAC Building Resources Across Communities

C&D Cooperation and Development CAP Consolidated Appeal or Consolidated Appeal Process CBPP contagious bovine pleuropneumonia CCO Certificate of Customary Ownership C&D Cooperation and Development CESVI Cooperazione e Sviluppo COOPI Cooperazione Internazionale CoU Church of Uganda CPA Concerned Parents’ Association CPAR Canadian Physicians for Aid and Relief CRS Catholic Relief Services CSCD Community Support for Capacity Development CUAMM (Italian acronym for University College for Aspiring Missionary Doctors) CW Concern Worldwide

DCC Database Coordination Committee DDMC District Disaster Management Committee DED German Development Service DOCAHWA Dodoth Community Animal Health Workers’ Association DPT diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus DRC Danish Refugee Council DRR disaster risk reduction DRRR disaster risk reduction and response DWSCC District Water and Sanitation Coordination Committee

ECD early childhood development ECHO European Commission Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection ERF Emergency Response Fund (OCHA) EVI extremely vulnerable individual

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FENU Forum for Education NGOs in Uganda FFS Farmer Field School FH Food for the Hungry FTS Financial Tracking Service

GAM global acute malnutrition GBV gender-based violence GEM Girls’ Education Movement GFD general food distribution GOAL (Irish NGO – not an acronym) GTZ German Technical Cooperation Agency GUSCO Gulu Support the Children Organization

43 UGANDA

HDR Human Development Report HDDS household dietary diversity score HEV hepatitis E virus HIV human immuno-deficiency virus HC (i) Health Centre (ii) Humanitarian Coordinator HCT (i) Humanitarian Country Team (ii) HIV Counselling and Testing

IAS International Aid Services IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP internally displaced person/people IDSR Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute IIRR International Institute of Rural Reconstruction IMC International Medical Corps IMCI integrated management of childhood illness IOM International Organization for Migration IPC Integrated (Food Security) Phase Classification IRC International Rescue Committee ITC inpatient therapeutic care IYCF infant and young child feeding

JEEP Joint Energy and Environment Projects

KADP Karamoja Agro-Pastoral Development Programme KAP knowledge, attitudes and practices KCVC Kotido Central Veterinary Care KDDS Karamoja Diocesan Development Services KICWA Kitgum Concerned Women’s Association KIDDP Karamoja Integrated Disarmament and Development Programme KOPEIN Kotido Peace Initiative-Interfaith

LWF Lutheran World Federation

MADEFO Matheniko Development Forum MAM moderate acute malnutrition MASDLG Masindi District Local Government MCHN mother and child health and nutrition MDG millennium development goals MGLSD Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development MoES Ministry of Education and Sports MoH Ministry of Health MoWT Ministry of Works and Transport MSF Médecins sans frontières MYR Mid-Year Review

NDP National Development Plan NFE non-formal education NFI non-food item NGO non-governmental organization NRC Norwegian Refugee Council NUMAT Northern Uganda Malaria AIDS and TB Programme NUSAF Northern Uganda Social Action Fund

OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights OPM Office of the Prime Minister OXFAM-GB Oxfam-Great Britain

PEP post-exposure prophylaxis PPR peste de petits ruminants (goat plague) PRDP Peace, Recovery and Development Plan PSN person with special needs

RH reproductive health

SAM severe acute malnutrition SCiUG Save the Children in Uganda SFC supplementary feeding centre

44 UGANDA

SFP supplementary feeding programme SGBV sexual and gender-based violence SP Samaritan’s Purse SSD Caritas Social Services and Development STF Straight Talk Foundation

TB tuberculosis TDO Temele Development Organization TFC therapeutic feeding centre TPO Transcultural Psycho-social Organization

UAM unaccompanied minor UBOS Uganda Bureau of Statistics UDHS Uganda Demographic and Health Survey UHRC Uganda Human Rights Commission UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNGEI United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative UNHCR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UHRC Uganda Human Rights Commission UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UPDF Uganda People’s Defence Forces URCS Uganda Red Cross Society UWESO Uganda Women’s Effort to Save Orphans UXO unexploded ordnance

VAM vulnerability analysis and mapping VHT village health team VIA Visions in Action VSF Véterinaires sans Frontières (Veterinarians without Borders)

WASH water, sanitation and hygiene WC-UK War Child – United Kingdom WCH War Child Holland WFP United Nations World Food Programme WHO World Health Organization WTU Windle Trust Uganda WV World Vision

YAASA Youth Anti-Aids Service Association YSA Youth Social Work Association

ZOA (Dutch NGO – not an acronym)

Consolidated Appeal Process (CAP)

The CAP is a tool for aid organizations to jointly plan, coordinate, implement and monitor their response to disasters and emergencies, and to appeal for funds together instead of competitively.

It is the forum for developing a strategic approach to humanitarian action, focusing on close cooperation between host governments, donors, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, International Organization for Migration (IOM) and, United Nations agencies. As such, it presents a snapshot of the situation and response plans, and is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of:

strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); resource mobilization leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal; coordinated programme implementation; joint monitoring and evaluation; revision, if necessary; reporting on results.

The CHAP is the core of the CAP – a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region, including the following elements:

A common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; An assessment of needs; Best, worst, and most likely scenarios; A clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; Prioritized response plans, including a detailed mapping of projects to cover all needs; A framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary.

The CHAP is the core of a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break out or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, and in consultation with host Governments and donors, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Humanitarian Country Team. This team includes Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) members and standing invitees (UN agencies, the International Organization for Migration, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR), but non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can also be included.

The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally near the end of each year to enhance advocacy and resource mobilization. An update, known as the Mid-Year Review, is presented to donors the following July.

Donors generally fund appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals listed in appeals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of appeal funding needs and worldwide donor contributions, and can be found on www.reliefweb.int/fts.

In sum, the CAP is how aid agencies join forces to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time.

OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA)

UNITED NATIONS PALAIS DES NATIONS NEW YORK, NY 10017 1211 GENEVA 10 USA SWITZERLAND