Download Document
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS ACF GOAL MACCA TEARFUND ACTED GTZ Malteser Terre des Hommes ADRA Handicap International Medair UNAIDS Afghanaid HELP Mercy Corps UNDP AVSI HelpAge International MERLIN UNDSS CARE Humedica NPA UNESCO CARITAS IMC NRC UNFPA CONCERN INTERSOS OCHA UN-HABITAT COOPI IOM OHCHR UNHCR CRS IRC OXFAM UNICEF CWS IRIN Première Urgence WFP DRC Islamic Relief Worldwide Save the Children WHO FAO LWF Solidarités World Vision International TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1 Table I: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by cluster) ................................................... 3 Table II: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by appealing organization).......................... 4 Table III: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by priority)................................................... 5 2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT, HUMANITARIAN NEEDS, AND RESPONSE.............................. 6 3. PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND SECTORAL TARGETS ... 8 3.1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES.............................................................................................................. 8 3.2 SECTOR RESPONSE PLANS.......................................................................................................... 9 Education ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Food Security and Agricultural Livelihoods.................................................................................... 11 Health and HIV/AIDS...................................................................................................................... 16 Nutrition .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Protection ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) ........................................................................................ 25 Refugees ........................................................................................................................................ 27 4. FORWARD VIEW .......................................................................................................................... 29 ANNEX I: LIST OF PROJECTS AND FUNDING TABLES............................................................. 30 Table IV: List of Appeal projects (grouped by cluster), with funding status of each ................................... 30 Table V: Summary of requirements and funding (grouped by location)..................................................... 39 Table VI: Total funding per donor (to projects listed in the Appeal) ........................................................... 40 Table VII: Total humanitarian assistance per donor (Appeal plus other) ................................................... 41 Table VIII: Summary of funding to projects not listed in the Appeal........................................................... 42 ANNEX II: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................ 43 Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://www.humanitarianappeal.net. Full project details can be viewed, downloaded and printed from www.reliefweb.int/fts. ii i SUDAN 0 50 100 150 200 km KOBOKO KAABONG YUMBE Moyo MOYO KITGUM Kaabong Koboko Yumbe Kitgum Adjumani P Arua ADJUMANI age ARUA Kotido Kib PA DE R ali Gulu Pader KOTIDO GULU To wn O MOROTO k o k Moroto Nebbi NEBBI A cu r APAC wa ke DEMOCRATIC Lira O Nile Apac LIRA Amuria REPUBLIC Victoria OF THE CONGO UGANDA AMURIA Katakwi MASINDI Nakapiripirit Lake Kaberamaido Lake Kwania KATAKWI Albert Masindi Soroti i NAKAPIRIPIRIT r a Amolatar h Bunia Lake S Hoima Kyoga NAKASONGOLA Kumi Kapchorwa HOIMA KUMI 14 Nakasongola 13 KAMULI Sironko Pallisa 12 Bukwa si KIBOGA NAKASEKE Kayunga Nku KALIRO PA LL I SA L Mbale BUNDIBUGYO u Kamuli Kibaale Kiboga g V Butaleja 10 11 i Kaliro o c Luweero t 7 o Manafwa KIBAALE r 8 i Bundibugyo Nakaseke 6 a IGANGA TORORO Fort Portal N i Iganga Kyenjojo l e Tororo i Mubende JINJA a lik KABAROLE KYENJOJO MITYANA ol m Wakiso Jinja z e MUBENDE Bugiri 9 N S Mukono Mayuge Busia Kakamega Kasese Kamwenge Masaka Mityana MUKONO KAMPALA MAYUGE MPIGI Mpigi KENYA KASESE Katonga WA KI S O BUGIRI Sembabule Ibanda KIRUHURA Kisumu MASAKA Lake Kalangala Winam Gulf Edward BUSHENYI Kiruhura Masaka Bushenyi KALANGALA Lake 4 Mbarara Victora Rakai 2 Rukungiri Kanungu ISINGIRO RAKAI Ntungamo Kasese 5 1 Kabale UNITED Kisoro 3 REPUBLIC OF RWANDA TANZANIA Legend Elevation (meters) 5,000 and above National capital 4,000 - 5,000 First administrative level capital 3,000 - 4,000 Populated place 2,500 - 3,000 2,000 - 2,500 International boundary 1,500 - 2,000 First administrative level boundary 1,000 - 1,500 800 - 1,000 Districts 600 - 800 400 - 600 1. Kisoro, 2. Kanungu. 3. Kabale, 4. Rukungiri, 5. Ntungamo, 200 - 400 6. Luweero, 7. Kuyunga, 8. Butajela, 9. Busia, 10. Mbale, 0-200 11. Manafwa, 12. Sironko, 13. Kapchorwa, 14. Bukwa Below sea level Disclaimers: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Map data sources: CGIAR, United Nations Cartographic Section, ESRI, Europa Technologies, UN OCHA. i v UGANDA 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Midway through the 2010 Consolidated Appeal (CAP), the humanitarian context in Uganda remains largely unchanged. While confidence in the sustainability of the current peace has resulted in significant homeward movements by internally displaced people (IDPs) and the closure of three- quarters of the camps, the dearth of basic social services continues to be a fundamental concern in northern Uganda and in Teso. Without significant improvement in their access to such essential services as safe water, sanitation, healthcare, and protection, IDPs returning to villages of origin cannot be said to have found durable solutions to their plight. Meaningful investment in such basic services is not only an effective approach to reducing, for instance, acute vulnerabilities to diseases like hepatitis E, but also represents a concrete peace dividend without which an effective transition from conflict to recovery and development is impossible. Similarly for Karamoja – where the livelihoods of close to a million people remain chronically fragile amid insecurity, climate change and historical marginalization – priority humanitarian action for the remainder of 2010 must address basic service needs within a wider development paradigm. Occasional excesses associated with the ongoing disarmament programme by the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) highlight the urgent need to support the expansion of civilian rule-of-law structures. The outbreak of cholera and the persistence of hepatitis E, which combined have infected over 1,000 people, signify unmitigated vulnerabilities amongst the population, acute deficiencies in safe water and sanitation coverage, and the inadequate availability of essential drugs and human resources. Across Uganda, natural disasters continue to pose serious threats to life and livelihoods, as illustrated by the landslides and floods in eastern and western Uganda at the beginning of March 2010 that left an estimated 300 people dead and several thousand displaced. Disaster preparedness and response, therefore, remain central to humanitarian concerns in 2010. Thus, the strategic objectives for the Uganda CAP 2010 are unchanged at the Mid-Year Review. Through the projects in the Appeal, humanitarian actors have committed to support the Government in basic service provision, food security, and emergency preparedness and response. Some two million vulnerable people, including residual and returning IDPs in Acholi and Teso regions, food-insecure populations in Karamoja region, and 143,000 refugees in the West Nile and south-western regions of the country will be targeted through projects worth a revised US$184,398,188. 1 But the success of this humanitarian plan is contingent on robust donor response to these projects. Unfortunately, at only 31% funding by June, the Uganda CAP 2010 – despite being the smallest in four years and representing a substantial reduction from the preceding Appeal – has realized the lowest funding of all previous Uganda CAPs at a corresponding stage in the last six years. Since 2000, nearly $1.5 billion has been invested in humanitarian actions in Uganda through the CAP. This largesse has helped to save lives, alleviate suffering, and protect the dignity of vulnerable and needy populations in Uganda. The Uganda CAP 2010, which aims to address unique humanitarian needs during a fragile transition from emergency to recovery and development, provides the opportunity to consolidate this substantial investment. 1 All dollar signs in this document denote United States dollars. Funding for this appeal should be reported to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS, [email protected]), which will display its requirements and