DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Annual Report Dear Friends, Colleagues and Supporters of the Cac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2019 ANNUAL REPORT DEAR FRIENDS, COLLEAGUES AND SUPPORTERS OF THE CAC, The year 2019 was transformational for the Chicago Architecture Center as the organization soared to “new heights” of accomplishment. At the same time, the year’s success laid groundwork for the CAC’s rapid response to the unforeseeable events of 2020. The Center’s enhanced physical presence in the form of its new home at Illinois Center brought greater visibility to the CAC’s growing role as a convener of—and leader within—local, regional and international communities. The centrality of this new location and its increased capacity for facilities and staff allowed the CAC to engage more individuals and families than ever in 2019. Adding to awards it received the previous year from the AIA and Friends of Downtown, the Center was recognized in 2019 with the Magnificent Mile Association’s “Business Impact of the Year” award. CAC President and CEO Lynn Osmond’s influence expanded in 2019 with her appointment to the City of Chicago Landmarks Commission and the start of her term as Vice Chair of Choose Chicago. Membership growth was among the CAC’s great success stories of 2019, with total revenue exceeding $1 million—marking an eight percent increase over blockbuster revenue numbers achieved in 2018. Average annual revenue per member household exceeded $100 for the first time, and the organization closed 2019 with 13,633 members in total. Extraordinary volunteer service and participation continued to provide bedrock support for the CAC, with more than 49,000 hours donated by more than 4,000 generous individuals. The CAC trained 80 new volunteers in 2019, providing them access to a variety of presentations and workshops for skill-building and professional development. In June 2019, the CAC assembled a committee dedicated to IDEA: Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility. Comprising representatives from all departments and various levels of the organization, the IDEA committee continually works to ensure the CAC is a welcoming environment for all people and reflects the dynamic variety of those who live in or visit Chicago. 2 CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE CENTER CONTENTS CONTENTS 4 The Center 6 Tours 8 Programs 01 Education 21 Financials 4 1 Campaign 6 1 Donors & Partners 42 Board of Trustees 25 Tour Partners & Staff 26 Volunteers Fully aligned with IDEA goals, the CAC Education programs for children and families awaken curiosity and advance quality learning in STEM subjects, with a longer-term objective of diversifying careers and leadership in architecture, construction, engineering and design. Educational offerings, both for children and adults, increased in frequency and participation during 2019. Building on strong relationships with the media, CAC disseminated information about the activities outlined above, garnering press coverage that reinforced to the public the key messages and brand identities the CAC launched in 2018. This coverage generated as many as 2.19 billion impressions, the equivalent of approximately $20 million in advertising dollars. Reaching these heights would not have been possible without the hard work and steadfast support of the entire Chicago Architecture Center community. The CAC views with pride the accomplishments of 2019—detailed throughout this report—and looks forward to its continued success. LYNN OSMOND JOHN PINTOZZI Hon. AIA, CAE Chair President and CEO Board of Trustees 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 3 STANDING TALL IN 2019, the CAC completed its first full year in the new space on Wacker Drive near Michigan Avenue. Overall, public response to the Center’s new location, its galleries and exhibits, its stunning window views and the visitor experience has been overwhelmingly positive. 4 CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE CENTER CENTER HIGHLIGHTS Over the course of six weeks in January and February, Center admissions in 2019 totaled 134,771, with nearly the CAC Orientation Hall welcomed a display of the 46% of those visitors also attending a CAFC River Cruise, finalists’ entries in the City of Chicago’s international CAC walking tour or bus tour. We were pleased that the competition to design the new O’Hare Global Terminal. Center was also the chosen venue for a number of high The exhibition featured a public voting component on profile events that brought more than 9,000 guests, schemes created by esteemed firms from across the including dinners, cocktail receptions and corporate parties. world, from Foster + Partners to Santiago Calatrava Notable events included the Economic Club of Chicago’s Architects & Engineers to Chicago teams headed by Fifth Night reception, a VIP reception and symposium SOM and eventual winner Studio ORD (led by Studio hosted during the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Gang). It resulted in significant public attendance and Habitat’s World Congress, and a reception for the media attention. Federation of Women Contractors, attended by Chicago Gallery content was refreshed throughout the year, Mayor Lori Lightfoot. including a new “Current Projects” installation in In August, CAC staff and volunteers conducted the the Chicago Gallery sponsored by Lendlease that Center’s first in-depth visitor survey and “follow-along” highlighted new design-forward developments across observations of guests in CAC galleries. Survey results the city. Two updates to the Chicago City Model, in show that guests are highly satisfied with their Center spring and fall 2019, added six buildings to the more visits, with the Chicago City Model Experience ranking than 4,250 on display. most popular among its exhibits. CENTER VOLUNTEERS EXHIBITS The Center experience was enhanced by 202 exhibit The year began with an opportunity to partner with the hosts and 91 guest services volunteers. Exhibit hosts Chicago Department of Aviation for a pop-up exhibition contributed 5,800 hours and guest services volunteers titled “Arriving at O’Hare: A New Global Terminal.” contributed 1,800 hours in 2019. 20192018 ANNUAL REPORT 5 CHICAGO PANORAMAS A TOTAL OF 411,000 PEOPLE attended CAC tours in 2019, the most ever! We have become the premier navigator for individuals, families and groups eager to learn about Chicago’s past and continuing architectural design heritage. WALKING TOURS Nearly 39,000 people attended CAC walking tours in 2019. The CAC’s two most popular walking tours were Historic Treasures and Chicago Architecture: A Walk Through Time. Union Station saw the highest attendance of any single-building tour, and Frank Lloyd Wright in Oak Park was the most popular neighborhood tour. There was a notable increase in the number of people attending Chicago Pedway tours, likely due to the CAC’s relocation to Illinois Center. Walking tours introduced in 2019 included Elevated Architecture: North Side Art, Louis Sullivan Rediscovered, Magnificent Architecture of the Magnificent Mile and Uptown. 6 CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE CENTER RIVER CRUISES BUS TOURS The Chicago Architecture Foundation Center River The CAC’s annual “special edition” bus tours continued Cruise aboard Chicago’s First Lady continued to be the to be popular with CAC members and Chicagoans, CAC’s most popular tour offering, both in attendance selling out at an 88% rate overall. Like last year, the tour and earned revenue. 2019 marked the 26th anniversary with the largest attendance in this series was Churches of the two organizations’ contractual relationship and by Bus. CAC docents also developed a special bus tour river cruise attendance increased by 4% over 2018. as part of this series to honor the work and legacy of the late architect Stanley Tigerman. Our Neighborhoods by Bus partnership with Big Bus continued to address visitors’ desire to explore our city in a dynamic way— on wheels! CAC bus tour attendance decreased overall, from 8,400 guests in 2018 to 7,500 in 2019. DOCENT VOLUNTEERS All tours are led by the CAC’s docent volunteers, among Chicago’s most highly respected volunteer corps. In 2019, this group included 451 active, emeritus and on-hiatus docents. More than 30 new docents were added to the corps as well, after spending nearly 12 weeks in training. Throughout 2019, 398 docents contributed 14,100 tour hours total. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 7 GAINING PERSPECTIVE IN 2019, the CAC Programs team worked to foster more informed and involved citizens, bolstering its reputation as a trusted source of information about the built environment. Programs for adults, numbering 38 in all, saw a 33% increase in attendees. WHAT’S NEXT BUILDING TALL This invitation-only, twice-annual forum aimed at C-suite Co-hosted with the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban decision-makers addressed issues that necessitate Habitat, these lectures explored key considerations in collaboration and alignment among leaders in business, tall building design, both now and into the future. A total design-related fields and city government. Panelists at of 374 people attended three programs, including one the inaugural What’s Next program in May 2019 included special evening event that celebrated the 50th anniversary SOM urban planner Phil Enquist, former Treasury Secretary of 875 North Michigan Avenue (formerly the John Hancock Hank Paulson, former IBM Fellow Kerrie Holley and Center), with three of the project’s original architects United Nations representative Patricia Holly Purcell. What’s and engineers. Next, a multi-year series generously supported by Sandra L. Helton and Norman Edelson, drew a capacity audience. ARCHITECT TALKS Sponsored by Related Midwest, these lectures invited ADULT EDUCATION CLASSES luminaries from multiple design-related fields to share the The CAC launched the Vincent Scully Masterclass Series evolution of their work throughout their esteemed careers. in April 2019 as a special addition to its Lifelong Learning Visiting presenters included the late Stanley Tigerman and, initiatives and a prime opportunity to introduce a broader in a special 2019 Chicago Architecture Biennial edition, audience to architecture. The CAC sold more than 400 architect Jha D. Williams on MASS Design Group’s Gun tickets to this inaugural three-part series, led by guest Violence Memorial Project.
Recommended publications
  • 4800-24 N. Sheridan Rd

    4800-24 N. Sheridan Rd

    4800-4824 N. Sheridan Road For Lease Chicago, IL 60640 | Uptown Retail Property ±920 SF, ±1,840 SF and ±8,271 SF available DEMOGRAPHICS Located at the NWC of Sheridan & Lawrence in Chicago’s .25 MILE .5 MILE 1 MILE Uptown neighborhood Estimated Population 11,251 29,869 70,371 Neighborhood convenience center is anchored by Wintrust Bank, H&R Block, KFC and Cricket Wireless Adj. Daytime 9,465 22,979 48,079 Demographics Less than two blocks from the CTA Red Line Lawrence 'L' Station (1M annual riders) Estimated Households 5,183 14,801 38,090 Walking distance to Uptown's notable attractions including Estimated Average $57,285 $60,386 $79,048 The Green Mill, The Riviera Theatre, Uptown Theatre, and the Household Income Aragon Ballroom Dense population surrounding the center Great visibility and parking, pylon signage available MARK FREDERICKS TREVOR JACK DOUG RENNER 312.275.3109 312.275.3128 312.275.3137 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] © 2018 All information supplied is from sources deemed reliable and is furnished subject to errors, omissions, modifications, removal of the listing from sale or lease, and to any listing conditions, including the rates and manner of payment of commissions for particular offerings, the terms of which are available to principals or duly licensed brokers. Any square footage dimensions set forth are approximate. BAUM REALTY GROUP • 1030 W CHICAGO AVE , SUITE 200 • CHICAGO, IL 60642 • 312.666.3000 • BAUMREALTY.COM 4800-4824 N. Sheridan Road For Lease Chicago, IL 60640 | Uptown
  • OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY of HISTORIC RESOURCES

    OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY of HISTORIC RESOURCES

    OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES II. HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT A. Torrance and Garden City Movement: The plan for the original City of Torrance, known as the Olmsted Tract, owes its origins to a movement that begin in England in the late 19th Century. Sir Ebenezer Howard published his manifesto “Garden Cities of To-morrow" in 1898 where he describes a utopian city in which man lives harmoniously together with the rest of nature. The London suburbs of Letchworth Garden City and Welwyn Garden City were the first built examples of garden city planning and became a model for urban planners in America. In 1899 Ebenezer founded the Garden City Association to promote his idea for the Garden City ‘in which all the advantages of the most energetic town life would be secured in perfect combination with all the beauty and delight of the country.” His notions about the integration of nature with town planning had profound influence on the design of cities and the modern suburb in the 20th Century. Examples of Garden City Plans in America include: Forest Hills Gardens, New York (by Fredrick Law Olmsted Jr.); Radburn, New Jersey; Shaker Heights, Ohio; Baldwin Hills Village, in Los Angeles, California and Greenbelt, Maryland. Fredrick Law Olmsted is considered to be the father of the landscape architecture profession in America. He had two sons that inherited his legacy and firm. They practiced as the Olmsted Brothers of Brookline Massachusetts. Fredrick Law Olmsted Junior was a founding member of The National Planning Institute of America and was its President from 1910 to 1919.
  • Journal of the American Institute of ARCH Itecr·S

    Journal of the American Institute of ARCH Itecr·S

    Journal of The American Institute of ARCH ITEcr·s PETEil HARRISON November, 1946 Fellowship Honors in The A.I.A. Examinations in Paris-I Architectural Immunity Honoring Louis Sullivan An Editorial by J. Frazer Smith The Dismal Fate of Christopher Renfrew What and Why Is an Industrial Designer? 3Sc PUBLISHED MONTHLY AT THE OCTAGON, WASHINGTON, D. C. UNiVERSITY OF ILLINOJS SMALL HOM ES COUNCIL MUMFORD ~O U SE "JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS NOVEMBER, 1946 VoL. VI, No. 5 Contents Fellowship Honors in The Ameri- Architectural Immunity 225 can Institute of Architects .... 195 By Daniel Paul Higgins By Edgar I. Williams, F.A.I.A. News of the Chapters and Other Honors . 199 Organizations . 228 Examinations in Paris-I .... 200 The Producers' Council. 231 By Huger Elliott The Dismal Fate of Christopher Architects Read and Write: Renfrew . 206 By Robert W. Schmertz "Organic Architecture" . 232 By William G. Purcell Honoring Louis Sullivan By Charles D. Maginnis, Advertising for Architects. 233 F.A.I.A. 208 By 0. H. Murray By William W. Wurster . 209 A Displaced Architect without Chapters of The A.I.A. 213 Documents . 233 By ]. Frazer Smith By Pian Drimmalen What and Why Is an Industrial News of the Educational Field. 234 Designer?. 217 By Philip McConnell The Editor's Asides . 236 ILLUSTRATIONS Tablet marking birth site of Louis H. Sullivan in Boston .. 211 Fur Shop in the Jay Jacob Store, Seattle, Wash .......... 212 George W. Stoddard and Associates, architects Remodeled Country House of Col. Henry W . Anderson, Dinwiddie Co., Va. 221 Duncan Lee, architect Do you know this building? ......
  • Uptown Theater Nomination

    Uptown Theater Nomination

    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION New Designation __X___ Amendment of a previous designation _____ Please summarize any amendment(s) _______________________________________________ Property Name: Uptown Theater______________________________________ If any part of the interior is being nominated, it must be specifically identified and described in the narrative statements. Address 3426 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC 20008 Square and lot number(s) Square 2069, Lot 0816 Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commission 3C Date of Construction: 1936 Date of major alteration(s) _______ Architect(s) _John J. Zink Architectural style(s): Moderne Original use Theater Present use Vacant/Not in Use Property owner Circle Management Company_____________________ ____________________ Legal address of property owner 4018 Brandywine Street NW Washington, DC 20016-1844 NAME OF APPLICANT(S) DC Preservation League and Cleveland Park Historical Society ___ If the applicant is an organization, it must submit evidence that among its purposes is the promotion of historic preservation in the District of Columbia. A copy of its charter, articles of incorporation, or by-laws, setting forth such purpose, will satisfy this requirement. Address/Telephone of applicant(s) 1221 Connecticut Avenue. NW Suite 5A, Washington, DC 200036; 202-783-5144 and P.O. Box 4862 Washington, DC 20008 Name and title of authorized representative: Rebecca Miller, Executive Director, DCPL and Rick Nash, President, Board of Directors, Cleveland Park Historical Society___________________ Signature of applicant representative: ______________________________ Date: 10/29/20 Signature of applicant representative: Date: 10/29/20 Name and telephone of author of application DC Preservation League 202-783-5144; Cleveland Park Historical Society 202-237-5241 Date received ___________ H.P.O.
  • Faith Reforming

    Faith Reforming

    Reforming Faith by Design Frank Furness’ Architecture and Spiritual Pluralism among Philadelphia’s Jews and Unitarians Matthew F. Singer Philadelphia never saw anything like it. The strange structure took shape between 1868 and 1871 on the southeast corner of North Broad and Mount Vernon streets, in the middle of a developing residential neighborhood for a newly rising upper middle class. With it came a rather alien addition to the city’s skyline: a boldly striped onion dome capping an octagonal Moorish-style minaret that flared outward as it rose skyward. Moorish horseshoe arches crowned three front entrances. The massive central At North Broad and Mount Vernon streets, Rodeph Shalom’s first purpose-built temple—de- doorway was topped with a steep gable signed by Frank Furness—announced the growing presence and aspirations of the newly developed neighborhood’s prospering German Jewish community. beneath a Gothic rose window that, in HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA turn, sat within another Moorish horse- shoe. Composed of alternating bands of phia. In a city of red-brick rowhouses built full Jewish emancipation and equality and yellow and red sandstone, the arches’ halo- primarily in neoclassical styles, Rodeph sparked new spasms of anti-Semitism. like tops appeared to radiate from central Shalom’s new temple mixed Islamic, Pedestrians gazing upon Rodeph disks incised with abstracted floral shapes. Byzantine and Gothic elements. Shalom may have wondered whether their Buttresses shored the sides of the building, Founded in 1795 as the first Ashkenazi wandering minds conjured an appari- which stood tall and vertical like a Gothic (Central and Eastern European) Jewish tion from a faraway time and place.
  • Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project Area

    Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project Area

    TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION PROJECT AREA Purpose • Create a community-led vision for redevelopment in the neighborhood • Test specific concepts for CTA owned parcels • Expedite development post-construction Timing • Outgrowth of the community engagement process that began in 2009 • Planning Grant award from Federal Transit Administration • Coordination between transit project and development sites Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area Community Engagement 12 month process 22 stakeholder meetings including 3 open house meetings: • May 2017 – idea gathering • November 2017 – vision & goals; initial ideas • May 2018 – review of recommendations; next steps Aldermanic dialogue Website updates Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area TOD Planning Process TODAY Discovery Visioning Development Recommendations Implementation 2018 2020’s • Existing • Engagement • Concept • Public meeting • Select Conditions development developers • Vision • Final report • Market • Market testing • Zoning / Analysis • Principles and public review Goals • Engagement • Transit project • Construction coordination • Concept refinement • Aldermanic reviews Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area A Multi-Modal District Pedestrians • Enhanced pedestrian environment • Widened sidewalk on Hollywood Boulevard Transit • CTA Bryn Mawr, Berwyn, Argyle, and Lawrence stations • Increased transit service • #36, #81, #84,
  • Architectural Styles/Types

    Architectural Styles/Types

    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
  • To Center City: the Evolution of the Neighborhood of the Historicalsociety of Pennsylvania

    To Center City: the Evolution of the Neighborhood of the Historicalsociety of Pennsylvania

    From "Frontier"to Center City: The Evolution of the Neighborhood of the HistoricalSociety of Pennsylvania THE HISToRICAL SOcIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA found its permanent home at 13th and Locust Streets in Philadelphia nearly 120 years ago. Prior to that time it had found temporary asylum in neighborhoods to the east, most in close proximity to the homes of its members, near landmarks such as the Old State House, and often within the bosom of such venerable organizations as the American Philosophical Society and the Athenaeum of Philadelphia. As its collections grew, however, HSP sought ever larger quarters and, inevitably, moved westward.' Its last temporary home was the so-called Picture House on the grounds of the Pennsylvania Hospital in the 800 block of Spruce Street. Constructed in 1816-17 to exhibit Benjamin West's large painting, Christ Healing the Sick, the building was leased to the Society for ten years. The Society needed not only to renovate the building for its own purposes but was required by a city ordinance to modify the existing structure to permit the widening of the street. Research by Jeffrey A. Cohen concludes that the Picture House's Gothic facade was the work of Philadelphia carpenter Samuel Webb. Its pointed windows and crenellations might have seemed appropriate to the Gothic darkness of the West painting, but West himself characterized the building as a "misapplication of Gothic Architecture to a Place where the Refinement of Science is to be inculcated, and which, in my humble opinion ought to have been founded on those dear and self-evident Principles adopted by the Greeks." Though West went so far as to make plans for 'The early history of the Historical Soiety of Pennsylvania is summarized in J.Thomas Scharf and Thompson Westcott, Hisiory ofPhiladelphia; 1609-1884 (2vols., Philadelphia, 1884), 2:1219-22.
  • General Executive Board Meetings Book 1 James J

    General Executive Board Meetings Book 1 James J

    REPORT OF THE GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETINGS BOOK 1 JAMES J. CLAFFEY, JR., Thirteenth Vice REPORT OF THE President GENERAL EXECUTIVE In addition to the members of the Board, those BOARD MEETING present included: International Trustees Patricia A. White, Carlos Cota and Andrew C. Oyaas; CLC HELD AT THE Delegate Siobhan Vipond; Assistant to the President SHERATON GRAND Sean McGuire; Director of Communications Matthew Cain; Director of Broadcast Sandra England; LOS ANGELES, CA Political Director J. Walter Cahill, Assistant Political JANUARY 29 – FEBRUARY 2, 2018 Director Erika Dinkel-Smith; Assistant Directors of Motion Picture and Television Production Daniel CALL TO ORDER Mahoney and Vanessa Holtgrewe; Co-Director of The regular Mid-Winter meeting of the General Stagecraft Anthony DePaulo, Assistant Director of Executive Board of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stagecraft D. Joseph Hartnett; Assistant Director Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists of Education and Training Robyn Cavanagh; and Allied Crafts of the United States, Its Territories and International Representatives Ben Adams, Steve Canada convened at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, January 29, Aredas, Christopher “Radar” Bateman, Steve Belsky, 2018 in the California BCEF Ballrooms of the Sheraton Jim Brett, Peter DaPrato, Don Gandolini, Jr., Ron Grand, Los Angeles, California. Garcia, John Gorey, Scott Harbinson, Krista Hurdon, Kent Jorgensen, Steve Kaplan, Mark Kiracofe, Peter Marley, Fran O’Hern, Joanne Sanders, Stasia Savage, ROLL CALL Lyle Trachtenberg, and Jason Vergnano; Staff General Secretary-Treasurer James B. Wood called members Leslie DePree, Asha Nandlal, Alejandra the roll and recorded the following members present: Tomais, Marcia Lewis and MaryAnn Kelly. MATTHEW D.
  • LUCAS CULTURAL ARTS MUSEUM MAYOR’S TASK FORCE REPORT | CHICAGO May 16, 2014

    LUCAS CULTURAL ARTS MUSEUM MAYOR’S TASK FORCE REPORT | CHICAGO May 16, 2014

    THE LUCAS CULTURAL ARTS MUSEUM MAYOR’S TASK FORCE REPORT | CHICAGO May 16, 2014 Mayor Rahm Emanuel City Hall - 121 N LaSalle St. Chicago, IL 60602 Dear Mayor Emanuel, As co-chairs of the Lucas Cultural Arts Museum Site Selection Task Force, we are delighted to provide you with our report and recommendation for a site for the Lucas Cultural Arts Museum. The response from Chicagoans to this opportunity has been tremendous. After considering more than 50 sites, discussing comments from our public forum and website, reviewing input from more than 300 students, and examining data from myriad sources, we are thrilled to recommend a site we believe not only meets the criteria you set out but also goes beyond to position the Museum as a new jewel in Chicago’s crown of iconic sites. Our recommendation offers to transform existing parking lots into a place where students, families, residents, and visitors from around our region and across the globe can learn together, enjoy nature, and be inspired. Speaking for all Task Force members, we were both honored to be asked to serve on this Task Force and a bit awed by your charge to us. The vision set forth by George Lucas is bold, and the stakes for Chicago are equally high. Chicago has a unique combination of attributes that sets it apart from other cities—a history of cultural vitality and groundbreaking arts, a tradition of achieving goals that once seemed impossible, a legacy of coming together around grand opportunities, and not least of all, a setting unrivaled in its natural and man-made beauty.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NFS Form 10-900 __ OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties dnd^Tt^^^j^ul^RtfcfiSinl^fl'itli iw li iT*i nn| ill h the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each itarr ry r^itftfft'Tii 111 ' Hl'iTp'rht" h™ or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for TOl1 applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property__________________________________________________________ historic name Foord & Massev Furniture Company Building___________________________________________ other names/site number CRS# N-7590____________________________ 2. Location street & number 701 N. Shiolev Street_______________________ not for publication N/A city or town Wilmington_________________ vicinity N/A state Delaware________ code DE county New Castle____ code 003 zip code 19801 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this \X^ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property y meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
  • UPTOWN and ANDERSONVILLE Bike Tour, Sunday June Twentynine, Two Thousand Eight

    UPTOWN and ANDERSONVILLE Bike Tour, Sunday June Twentynine, Two Thousand Eight

    UPTOWN AND ANDERSONVILLE bike tour, sunday june twentynine, two thousand eight. All Content Copyright © 2007-2008 Big Shoulders Realty, LLC. All Rights Reserved. uptown and andersonville bike tour Our Route, Part One uptown and andersonville bike tour Tour Part One – turn by turn instructions 1. Start at Graceland Cemetery, 4001 N Clark 22. Turn right heading north on Racine 2. Proceed east on Irving Park 23. Take a SHARP right, heading southeast on Broadway 3. Turn left heading north on Sheridan 24. Turn right heading west on Montrose 4. Take a SHARP right heading south on Broadway 25. Turn right heading north on Clifton, which curves to the left 5. Turn left, heading east on Irving Park 26. Turn left heading south on Racine 6. Turn left, heading north on Marine Dr. 27. Turn right heading west on Montrose 7. Turn left, heading west on Hutchinson 28. Turn right heading north on Beacon 8. Turn left, heading south on Hazel 29. Turn left, heading west on Leland 9. Turn left, heading east on Buena 30. Turn left, heading south on Dover 10. Turn left, heading north on Clarendon 31. Turn right, heading west on Wilson 11. Turn right heading east on Montrose 32. Turn right, heading north on Ashland 12. Stay on Montrose until after you cross under Lake Shore Drive. 33. Turn left, heading west on Lawrence 13. Then veer left onto the bike path. 34. Turn left, heading south on Paulina 14. The path will veer northeast up to the Lake 35. Turn right, heading west on Sunnyside 15.