Virginia-Secession.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Virginia-Secession.Pdf EDUCATION NEEDED ABOUT LEE, JACKSON & CONFEDERACY The Invasion On May 23, 1861, the people of Virginia voted on whether or not to secede from the Union after Abraham Lincoln’s issued a proclamation for troops to invade southern states. At about 2am that night, before newspapers could publish the results of their near 4-1 landslide vote, Lincoln sent 14,000 Union troops across the bridges to occupy Alexandria and Arlington. That began a, half-million man, 20 entry point invasion of Virginia destroying many Virginians' homes, families, farms, cattle, property and lives. Generals Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson and many others defended the people of Virginia against the Union Army’s direct attacks on civilians in places like Fredericksburg, Petersburg and the Shenandoah Valley. Art. IV Sec. IV of the U.S. Constitution requires the federal government to protect the states and its people from invasion and domestic violence. Art. I Sec. X, prohibits states to “engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay” The People’s Right to Secede Article VII of the U.S. Constitution explains how only 9 states are needed for the union to exist so participation by additional states is optional. Nowhere does the Constitution say the union is perpetual. If it did it would have never been ratified after the anti-federalist debates. The people of Virginia Tennessee and Texas voted to secede according to the powers reserved for them over the federal government in the 9th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The state legislatures of eight other states voted to secede according to the power reserved to them over the federal government in the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Several states had explicitly reconfirmed their right to leave the Union when they ratified the U.S. Constitution in 1788 to 1790. The 13 free, independent, sovereign states received power when it was transferred from the King of England in the 1783 Treaty of Paris. Representatives of the states negotiated and signed the treaty that maintained their sovereign status as they proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence. Those states had ratified the Articles of Confederation in 1781 to create a subordinate federal government with state controlled military power and no mention of slavery. The states then ratified the U.S. Constitution that was flawed with no Presidential term limits, nationalized slavery and inadequate protections for the people if a President simply ignored the document. Regardless of its flaws, the states created the federal government and ratified its governing documents. The federal government did not create the states. Why the States Seceded Virginians were law abiding members of the Union on April 12th when South Carolina shelled Fort Sumter to get back its property for the defense of Charleston. The Virginia state legislature voted to stay in the Union on April 4th by a 2-1 margin after the South Carolina delegates voted 169-0 to secede on December 20, 1860. South Carolina first considered secession in 1830 when it nullified the 62% Tariff of Abominations claiming the federal government, “has raised and collected un-necessary revenue for objects unauthorized by the Constitution;” Tariff rates were lowered over a 10 year period but the Morrill Tariff Act threaten to increase the rates from about 17% to 30% after passing the U.S. House in May of 1860. The 1860 secession document cited ”…frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States...” as causes of secession. A key concern was an unwillingness to enforce Art IV, Sec 2 of the U.S. Constitution in regards to returning runaway slaves. The document contends that “encroachments have continued to increase” and that some states unconstitutionally elevated persons to citizenship who voted to elect the country’s first sectionalist Presidential and Vice Presidential ticket that would assume power in March, 1861. After seceding, South Carolina sent commissioners to Washington D.C. to negotiate payment for return of the Fort Sumter property but President Buchanan refused to meet. On January 5, Buchanan sent the Star of the West to resupply the fort. On January 9, South Carolina fired at the ship to thwart the resupply effort. News of Buchannan’s decision to resupply the fort rather than return it triggered delegates of six more states to vote to secede from the union after conventions had been called in their states. The votes were not close and they came in rapid fire order. On January 9, Mississippi delegates voted 83-15 to secede. On January 10, Florida delegates voted 62-7 to secede. On January 11, Alabama delegates voted 61-39 to secede. On January 19, Georgia delegates voted 208-89 to secede. On January 26, Louisiana delegates voted 113-17 to secede. On February 1, Texas delegates voted 166-7 to hold a public referendum on secession. On February 23, the people of Texas voted 44,317 to 13,020 to secede. Those states formed the Confederacy, which sent commissioners to Washington D.C. again to negotiate payment for return of the Fort Sumter property. This time the newly sworn in President Lincoln also refused to meet with them. Major Anderson and Commanding Union General Winfield Scott advised against resupplying the previously evacuated, and then reoccupied, fort because it had no military value. Postmaster General Montgomery Blair was the only cabinet member who wanted to resupply the fort. He recommended a mission using his brother-in-law who set sail after Blair and Lincoln convinced cabinet members Chase and Wells that South Carolina could be blamed for an incident to start a war. South Carolina and the new Confederacy were still faced with a dilemma: Prevent resupply of Fort Sumter or give the Union the ability to destroy Charleston by shelling like they eventually did to Petersburg and Vicksburg. To provide for their defense with minimal bloodshed they chose to gain control of the fort before the resupply ships arrived. Confederate Gen. Beauregard warned his mentor Union Major Anderson in advance that they must fire on the fort. The shelling forced Anderson to surrender the fort and there were no deaths or casualties. South Carolina and other seceding states committed no other act of aggression against the Union before Lincoln’s invasion of Virginia. Cause of War Had Lincoln not invaded Virginia there would have been no war. On April 15th, the day after Major Anderson formally surrendered the fort, Lincoln issued his proclamation for 75,000 troops. The governors of Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, Missouri, Kentucky and North Carolina sent scathing refusals explaining to the president that his proclamation was illegal and unconstitutional. Their letters confirmed the opinion Attorney General Jeremiah Black gave to President Buchanan just four months earlier. Black wrote that such action “…would destroy the theory of our Union” On April 19th newly recruited troops from Massachusetts traveled to Washington where they prepared to invade Americans in the south. They crossed Maryland against the will of Maryland Governor Thomas Holliday Hicks and the people of Baltimore rioted. The troops opened fire on a crowd killing 12 Maryland citizens. Some in the crowd had revolvers and returned fire killing four Massachusetts infantrymen. These are considered to be the first casualties of the war. The Confederate states were not involved. Once Lincoln issued the April 15th proclamation for 75,000 troops to invade southern states without Congressional approval, he forced a horrible alternative on the people of Virginia: Kill or be killed. Virginians had to vote to attack their fellow southerners and kill them for seceding or be invaded and killed themselves for seceding. On April 23rd the Virginia legislature scheduled a public referendum on secession for May 23. On that day, Virginians made the only honorable decision that they could under those circumstances: They voted overwhelmingly 132,201 to 37,451 to secede. On May 6, the Tennessee legislature also scheduled a secession referendum and on June 8 the people of Tennessee followed suit by a 108,339 to 47,233 margin. Delegates of North Carolina and Arkansas made the same honorable decision. Maryland would also have seceded however the Union Army, under direct order from Secretary of War Simon Cameron, arrested 30 state legislators to prevent Maryland from seceding. Missouri attempted to remain neutral but the Union Army attacked the state militia to force duly elected governor Claiborne Jackson to vacate his office. Both actions violated Article 1 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution which clearly defines that the states have jurisdiction for conducting elections. Slavery Myths Secession documents show that slavery was a catalyst for secession but it was not the sole cause of secession and it was definitely not the cause of war. Mississippi seceded almost solely over the right to maintain involuntary servitude. Several states echoed South Carolina’s complaint about an unwillingness to return runaway slaves along with other Constitutional issues. Georgia railed against the federal government for collecting tariffs excessive to the need to fulfill its constitutional obligations. Texas cited a failure by the federal government to protect Texans from Indians and outlaw murders as well as the isolation they had with the Union once their neighboring states seceded. The secession documents and chronology of actual events shows that the people who voted by referendum in Virginia, Tennessee and Texas did not vote to secede because of slavery. Numbers vary by state, but on average only 5% of the population and, 25% of families in seceding states had servants. Texans had other issues driving their vote other than just slavery as previously explained.
Recommended publications
  • The Confederate Informant
    The Confederate Informant the official newsletter of the Major James Morgan Utz Camp #1815 Sons of Confederate Veterans and the Brigadier General Francis Marion Cockrell Chapter #84 of the Military Order of the Stars and Bars.....March 2015 ************************************************************************************************* Camp Officers Commander...Dave Roper; [email protected] 1st Lt. Commander...Duane Mayer; [email protected] 2nd Lt. Commander, Florida...Rojer Snyder 2nd Lt, Commander, Pilot Knob...Rob Graham; [email protected] Adjutant....Brad Bludsworth; [email protected] Treasurer...Bill Bowden; [email protected] ******************************************************************* In this issue.................................................. Commander's Call...page2 Chaplain's Corner & Liberty Quotes...page3 Camp News..............page4 Lt. Sam Kennard......page5 Capt. Robert McCulloch........page 6 MOSB Report....page7 My Confederate Ancestor...page8 visit our camp website at...www.utzfmc.wordpress.com 1 Commander's Call...... Let me begin by saying that those who were at the February Meeting just raved about our new meeting place. We had a great meeting even though we had to reschedule, we still had great attendance. Everyone liked the discussion we had on why my Confederate Ancestor fought for Southern Independence. The next Camp Meeting will be March 14 at our new home the Committee Commons 427 Spencer Rd. St. Peters MO. If you need directions call Dave Roper at 618-304- 7758 or email [email protected]. I know it will only be 3 weeks since or last meeting but we are trying to keep our meetings on the 2nd Saturday of each month. We are also getting into our busy time of the year. February 28th was the Jefferson Barracks Swap Meet that was held at the Affton White Rodgers Community Center 9801 Mackenzie, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Mrs. General Lee's Attempts to Regain Her Possessions After the Cnil War
    MRS. GENERAL LEE'S ATTEMPTS TO REGAIN HER POSSESSIONS AFTER THE CNIL WAR By RUTH PRESTON ROSE When Mary Custis Lee, the wife of Robert E. Lee, left Arlington House in May of 1861, she removed only a few of her more valuable possessions, not knowing that she would never return to live in the house which had been home to her since her birth in 1808. The Federal Army moved onto Mrs. Lee's Arling­ ton estate on May 25, 1861. The house was used as army headquarters during part of the war and the grounds immediately around the house became a nation­ al cemetery in 1864. Because of strong anti-confederate sentiment after the war, there was no possibility of Mrs. Lee's regaining possession of her home. Restora­ tion of the furnishings of the house was complicated by the fact that some articles had been sent to the Patent Office where they were placed on display. Mary Anna Randolph Custis was the only surviving child of George Washing­ ton Parke Custis and Mary Lee Fitzhugh. Her father was the grandson of Martha Custis Washington and had been adopted by George Washington when his father, John Custis, died during the Revolutionary War. The child was brought up during the glorious days of the new republic, living with his adopted father in New York and Philadelphia during the first President's years in office and remaining with the Washingtons during their last years at Mount Vernon. In 1802, after the death of Martha Washington, young Custis started building Arlington House on a hill overlooking the new city of Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinterpreting Robert E. Lee Through His Life at Arlington House
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2020 The House That Built Lee: Reinterpreting Robert E. Lee Through his Life at Arlington House Cecilia Paquette University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Paquette, Cecilia, "The House That Built Lee: Reinterpreting Robert E. Lee Through his Life at Arlington House" (2020). Master's Theses and Capstones. 1393. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1393 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HOUSE THAT BUILT LEE Reinterpreting Robert E. Lee Through his Life at Arlington House BY CECILIA PAQUETTE BA, University of Massachusetts, Boston, 2017 BFA, Massachusetts College of Art and Design, 2014 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History September, 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2020 Cecilia Paquette ii This thesis was examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in History by: Thesis Director, Jason Sokol, Associate Professor, History Jessica Lepler, Associate Professor, History Kimberly Alexander, Lecturer, History On August 14, 2020 Approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School. !iii to Joseph, for being my home !iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisory committee at the University of New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Women and Their Families in the 19Th Century: Papers
    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of Research Collections in Women’s Studies General Editors: Anne Firor Scott and William H. Chafe Southern Women and Their Families in the 19th Century: Papers and Diaries Consulting Editor: Anne Firor Scott Series A, Holdings of the Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Parts 4–6: Nicholas Philip Trist Papers; Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida Collections; Virginia Collections Associate Editor and Guide Compiled by Martin P. Schipper A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Southern women and their families in the 19th century, papers, and diaries. Series A, Holdings of the Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill [microform] / consulting editor, Anne Firor Scott. microfilm reels. -- (Research collections in women’s studies) Accompanied by printed reel guide compiled by Martin P. Schipper. Contents: pt. 1. Mary Susan Ker Papers, 1785–1923 -- [etc.] -- pt. 5. Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida collections -- pt. 6. Virginia collections. ISBN 1-55655-417-6 (pt. 4 : microfilm) ISBN 1-55655-418-4 (pt. 5 : microfilm) ISBN 1-55655-419-2 (pt. 6 : microfilm) 1. Women--Southern States--History--19th century. 2. Family-- Southern States--History 19th century. I. Scott, Anne Firor, 1921– . II. Schipper, Martin Paul. III. Ker, Mary Susan, 1839–1923. IV. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Library. Southern Historical Collection. V. University Publications of America (Firm). VI. Series. [HQ1458] 305.4′0975--dc20 91-45750 CIP Copyright © 1991 by University Publications of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford's Theatre, Lincoln's Assassination and Its Aftermath
    Narrative Section of a Successful Proposal The attached document contains the narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful proposal may be crafted. Every successful proposal is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the program guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/education/landmarks-american-history- and-culture-workshops-school-teachers for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Education Programs staff well before a grant deadline. The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Seat of War and Peace: The Lincoln Assassination and Its Legacy in the Nation’s Capital Institution: Ford’s Theatre Project Directors: Sarah Jencks and David McKenzie Grant Program: Landmarks of American History and Culture Workshops 400 7th Street, S.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8500 F 202.606.8394 E [email protected] www.neh.gov 2. Narrative Description 2015 will mark the 150th anniversary of the first assassination of a president—that of President Abraham Lincoln as he watched the play Our American Cousin at Ford’s Theatre, six blocks from the White House in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Women's Lives
    Documenting Women’s Lives A Users Guide to Manuscripts at the Virginia Historical Society A Acree, Sallie Ann, Scrapbook, 1868–1885. 1 volume. Mss5:7Ac764:1. Sallie Anne Acree (1837–1873) kept this scrapbook while living at Forest Home in Bedford County; it contains newspaper clippings on religion, female decorum, poetry, and a few Civil War stories. Adams Family Papers, 1672–1792. 222 items. Mss1Ad198a. Microfilm reel C321. This collection of consists primarily of correspondence, 1762–1788, of Thomas Adams (1730–1788), a merchant in Richmond, Va., and London, Eng., who served in the U.S. Continental Congress during the American Revolution and later settled in Augusta County. Letters chiefly concern politics and mercantile affairs, including one, 1788, from Martha Miller of Rockbridge County discussing horses and the payment Adams's debt to her (section 6). Additional information on the debt appears in a letter, 1787, from Miller to Adams (Mss2M6163a1). There is also an undated letter from the wife of Adams's brother, Elizabeth (Griffin) Adams (1736–1800) of Richmond, regarding Thomas Adams's marriage to the widow Elizabeth (Fauntleroy) Turner Cocke (1736–1792) of Bremo in Henrico County (section 6). Papers of Elizabeth Cocke Adams, include a letter, 1791, to her son, William Cocke (1758–1835), about finances; a personal account, 1789– 1790, with her husband's executor, Thomas Massie; and inventories, 1792, of her estate in Amherst and Cumberland counties (section 11). Other legal and economic papers that feature women appear scattered throughout the collection; they include the wills, 1743 and 1744, of Sarah (Adams) Atkinson of London (section 3) and Ann Adams of Westham, Eng.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Commander's Corner Upcoming
    Vol. 6 No. 10 Copyright 2020 October 2020 Winner of the Texas Division Best Newsletter Award, 2017, 2018 & 2020 Winner of the SCV National Best Newsletter Award, 2016, 2017 & 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS interested. Also look at your friends on Facebook. Those that submit or share items that Commander’s Corner ......................................... 1 is favorable to our cause may be prime Upcoming Events ............................................... 1 candidates. For those that belong to other DavidRReynolds.org .......................................... 2 organization, your members there are more likely Our Charge ......................................................... 2 to join than individuals who do not belong to any A Blast from the Past ......................................... 2 organization. Last Camp Meeting ............................................ 3 Battles Fought During the Month ...................... 3 If you do not feel comfortable in approaching The Shame of Bentonville .................................. 4 anyone you know then simply give me their name The History of Arlington Cemetery ................... 6 and contact number and I’ll make the contact. Birthdays & Anniversaries ................................. 8 Guardian News ................................................... 8 It is also approaching the time to start thinking The Conquered Banner ...................................... 9 about our camp and Division Leaders for next year. I’m asking anyone who wants to hold an office in the 1st Lt David Richard Reynolds Camp to please let me know. COMMANDER’S CORNER by Larry “Joe” Reynolds UPCOMING EVENTS With the Fall season and cooler weather arriving, I look forward to getting back to normal. Which means we can Monday, October 19th, 7:00 p.m. start holding memorial services again for our Refreshments at 6:30 p.m. honored ancestors. It also means that next month Old Union Community Center we can hold our regular meeting in our Hwy 67E, Mount Pleasant, Texas designated room.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sins of the Father: “Light Horse” Harry Lee and Robert E. Lee
    The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of Civil War Institute History 5-23-2018 The insS of the Father: “Light Horse” Harry Lee and Robert E. Lee Savannah Labbe Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler Part of the Military History Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Labbe, Savannah, "The inS s of the Father: “Light Horse” Harry Lee and Robert E. Lee" (2018). The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of History. 308. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/308 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/308 This open access blog post is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The insS of the Father: “Light Horse” Harry Lee and Robert E. Lee Abstract In early 1862, Robert E. Lee was not yet in command of the Army of Northern Virginia. Instead, he was sent by Confederate President Jefferson Davis to inspect and improve the South’s coastal defenses. This job brought him to Cumberland Island, a barrier island off the oc ast of Georgia, and while there, he visited the ancestral home of Nathanael Greene, where his father was buried in the family plot.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandria Library, Special Collections Subject Index to Northern Virginia History Magazines
    Alexandria Library, Special Collections Subject Index to Northern Virginia History Magazines SUBJECT TITLE MAG DATE VOL ABBEY MAUSOLEUM LAND OF MARIA SYPHAX & ABBEY MAUSOLEUM AHM OCT 1984 VOL 7 #4 ABINGDON ABINDGON MANOR RUINS: FIGHT TO SAVE AHM OCT 1996 V 10 #4 ABINGDON OF ALEXANDER HUNTER, ET. AL. AHM OCT 1999 V 11 #3 AMONG OUR ARCHIVES AHM OCT 1979 VOL 6 #3 ARLINGTON'S LOCAL & NATIONAL HERITAGE AHM OCT 1957 VOL 1 #1 LOST HERITAGE: EARLY HOMES THAT HAVE DISAPPEARED NVH FEB 1987 VOL 9 #1 VIVIAN THOMAS FORD, ABINGDON'S LAST LIVING RESIDENT AHM OCT 2003 V 12 #3 ABOLITION SAMUEL M. JANNEY: QUAKER CRUSADER NVH FEB 1981 VOL 3 #3 ADAMS FAMILY SOME 18TH CENTURY PROFILES, PT. 1 AHM OCT 1977 VOL 6 #1 AESCULAPIAN HOTEL HISTORY OF SUNSET HILLS FARM FHM 1958-59 VOL 6 AFRICAN-AMERICANS BLACK HISTORY IN FAIRFAX COUNTY FXC SUM 1977 VOL 1 #3 BRIEF HISTORY & RECOLLECTIONS OF GLENCARLYN AHM OCT 1970 VOL 4 #2 DIRECTOR'S CHAIR (GUM SPRINGS) AAVN JAN 1988 VOL 6 #1 GUM SPRINGS COMMUNITY FXC SPR 1980 VOL 4 #2 GUM SPRINGS: TRIUMPH OF BLACK COMMUNITY FXC 1989 V 12 #4 NEW MT. VERNON MEMORIAL: MORE THAN GW'S SLAVES FXC NOV 1983 VOL 7 #4 SOME ARL. AREA PEOPLE: THEIR MOMENTS & INFLUENCE AHM OCT 1970 VOL 4 #1 SOME BLACK HISTORY IN ARLINGTON COUNTY AHM OCT 1973 VOL 5 #1 UNDERGROUND RAILROAD ADVISORY COM. MEETING AAVN FEB 1995 V 13 #2 AFRICAN-AMERICANS-ALEXANDRIA ARCHAEOLOGY OF ALEXANDRIA'S QUAKER COMMUNITY AAVN MAR 2003 V 21 #2 AFRICAN-AMERICANS-ARCHAEOLOGY BLACK BAPTIST CEMETERY ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVEST AAVN AUG 1991 VOL 9 #8 CEMETERY DISCOVERIES AAVN FEB 1992 V 10 #2
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Family Member Faqs
    HOME ABOUT FAMILY PAPERS REFERENCES RESOURCES PRESS ROOM Lee Family Member FAQs Richard Lee, the Immigrant The Lee Family Digital Archive is the largest online source for Who was RL? primary source materials concerning the Lee family of Richard Lee was the ancestor of the Lee Family of Virginia, many of whom played prominent roles in the Virginia. It contains published political and military affairs of the colony and state. Known as Richard Lee the Immigrant, his ancestry is not and unpublished items, some known with certainty. Since he became one of Virginia's most prominent tobacco growers and traders he well known to historians, probably was a younger son of a substantial family involved in the mercantile and commercial affairs of others that are rare or have England. Coming to the New World, he could exploit his connections and capital in ways that would have been never before been put online. impossible back in England. We are always looking for new When was RL Born? letters, diaries, and books to add to our website. Do you Richard Lee was born about 1613. have a rare item that you Where was RL Born? would like to donate or share with us? If so, please contact Richard Lee was born in England, but no on knows for sure exactly where. Some think his ancestors came our editor, Colin Woodward, at from Shropshire while others think Worcester. (Indeed, a close friend of Richard Lee said Lee's family lived in (804) 493-1940, about how Shropshire, as did a descendent in the eighteenth century.) Attempts to tie his ancestry to one of the dozen or you can contribute to this so Lee familes in England (spelled variously as Lee, Lea, Leight, or Lega) that appeared around the time of the historic project.
    [Show full text]
  • Information About Washington DC Preface: I Hope Each of You Are Looking Forward to the Washington, D. C. Trip As Much As I
    Information about Washington DC Preface: I hope each of you are looking forward to the Washington, D. C. trip as much as I am. Mr. Fifer and I have prepared this pamphlet in order you may get the most of your trip. The preparation prior to the trip is what sets your trip apart from many other so that you may reflect, enjoy, and experience our nation's capital. The City Today: The city of Washington takes up the entire District of Columbia, so they are essentially the same thing. DC is not state so it does not to send any Representatives or Senators to Congress, but it is worth three Electoral votes in the Presidential election. Washington, DC has a population of approximately 560,000 people, making it smaller than Columbus, Ohio. This is very misleading however. Counting the suburbs in Maryland and Virginia, DC has a metropolitan area of over 5 Million, fifth largest in the country, compared to 1.5 million for Columbus. You won't see any skyscrapers in DC, although you will see them across the Potomac River in Virginia. There is a height restriction in DC so that the Capitol Building and the Washington Monument are never overshadowed by other buildings. You will see statues; hundreds of statues of famous people are all over the city. History of DC: A site on the Potomac River for a new capital city was selected in 1788 as a compromise between the Northern and Southern states. The site was picked because it was on the "fall line" of the Potomac.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ravensworth Farmer Issue 7
    The Official Publication of the Ravensworth Farm Civic Association, Inc. Springfield, Virginia May 2016 The Ravensworth Farmer Issue 7 SERVE IN YOUR COMMUNITY! GENERAL MEMBERSHIP CIVIC ASSOC. ELECTIONS MEETING, MAY 26 Elections for the Fall 2016-Summer 2017 Ravensworth Farm Civic Association board will be held Thursday, Thursday, May 26 @ 7:30PM May 26 during the General Meeting of the Civic Associ- Community of Christ Church on Inverchapel ation. While some members of the Board are able to serve again, there are several vacancies. Please consider Tyler Small, resident of Ravensworth Farm and serving on your Civic Associa- tion’s board. If you are interested professional home inspector, will talk about in serving, contact Kevin Joyce or maintenance and repair issues for our homes any other member of the current here in Ravensworth. Board for more information on the positions. Homeowners and renters in Ravensworth Farm are eligible IN THIS ISSUE to serve on the Board. Nominate an Environmental Hero, pg. 4 President - VACANT - Kevin Joyce stepping down as they prepare for the arrival of a little Joyce this summer Ravensworth Farms’ Own Farmers Market, pg. 8 1st Vice President - VACANT 2nd Vice President - Scott Houghton - willing to Pool News, pg. 8 serve again Treasurer - Heather Scott - willing to serve again History of Ravensworth PlantaƟon, pg. 9 Corresponding Secretary - VACANT Recording Secretary - Ginger Rogers - willing to Upcoming Events, pg. 17 serve again Coyote Awareness Tips, pg. 22 Article I, Section 3, of the Civic Association's By-Laws provides that the Association shall be strictly non-partisan, non-political, and non- sectarian.
    [Show full text]