DOCSLIB.ORG

George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4 George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4 To GOVERNOR WILLIAM LIVINGSTON October 20, 1780. [See Circular to the States, October 18, 1780] To GOVERNOR GEORGE CLINTON Head Quarters near Passaic, October 21, 1780. Dear Sir: I do myself the honor to inclose Your Excellency the Copy of a Letter which has just come to hand from Mr Duer. 39 Although the testimony contained in it does not seem to be so direct as to make Mr. Smith obnoxious to a Military process, Yet, agreeable to Mr. Duer's request, I thought it necessary you should be apprized of it, that the State may be enabled to take the proper measures for the public safety. How far this information ought to co-operate with other circumstances to have Mr Smith removed from the vicinity of our Posts at Kings Ferry, Your Excellency, from a full knowledge of his character 40 and connections, will be better able to determine than I am. I have the honor etc. To WILLIAM DUER Head Quarters, Prekaness, October 21, 1780. Sir: I have transmitted a Copy of your letter of the 11th., which only reached me last evening, to Governor Clinton, as I did not 39. Thomas Smith. He was a brother of Joshua Hett Smith, and was reported to have been seen in New York City. 40. The draft is in the writing of David Humphreys. George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4 http://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw3c.004 think it contained evidence sufficient to support a military trial. It may however, added to other circumstances of a very suspicious nature, furnish the Legislature with good reasons for removing the Gentleman in question from Hayerstraw, which, from its vicinity to our posts, affords him an opportunity of gaining and giving intelligence very material to the enemy and injurious to us. Of his 41 dispositions to do this there is little doubt. I am &c. To GOVERNOR THOMAS SIM LEE Head Quarters, Preckaness, October 23, 1780. Sir: Major General Greene, who goes to take command of the Southern Army, will have the honor of presenting this to Your Excellency. I have advised him to take the several States in his way, which are immediately concerned in furnishing Men and supplies for the department committed to his direction, that he may gain a more accurate knowledge of the forwardness they are in, a tolerable Idea of what may be his future expectations, and endeavour to settle some plans for the regular support and subsistence of the Army in provisions, Forage and transportation. I am well aware of the embarrassments under which the Southern States labor, and of the many difficulties which are to be 41. The draft is in the writing of Tench Tilghman. surmounted. But I have a very full dependance that the most vigorous exertions will be made by them upon the present occasion; and the entire confidence I have in the abilities, fortitude and integrity of General Greene, founded on a long and intimate experience of them, assures me that he will do every thing his means will enable him to do; and I doubt not, candid allowances will be made for the peculiar difficulties he has to encounter. I recommend him to your State as worthy of its utmost confidence and support, and to your Excellency, personally, as one whom I rank among the number of my Friends. With the greatest 74 Respect and Esteem etc. [MD.H.S.] To GOVERNOR JONATHAN TRUMBULL George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4 http://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw3c.004 Head Quarters near Passaic Falls, October 28, 1780. Dear Sir: I am to request your Excellency to direct the salt Beef mentioned in your letter of the 31st: of August, and concerning which 74. In the writing of Tench Tilghman. The same letter was sent to Govs. Thomas Jefferson and Abner Nash. It is printed by Sparks under date of Oct. 22, 1780. I wrote to you from Harford, to be forwarded with as much expedition as possible to Fishkill landing, by the upper route, as that by Crumpond has become dangerous, from the incursions of the Enemy's Refugee Corps. I am the more anxious to have this parcel of salt provision brought speedily to the North River, as I see no other, on which I can depend, for furnishing a Winter supply for the important Garrison of Fort schuyler, and if it is not got up to that post in the month of November, it will be extremely difficult afterwards, from the badness of the Road. Although the season is already arrived when the Magazines of salt Meat, for the ensuing Winter and Campaign, should be laid in, I cannot learn that the Commissary General has been enabled to put up a single Barrel; so far from it, it is with difficulty the troops, in any quarter, are subsisted upon fresh 11 Meat from day to day. I have the honor &c. To GOVERNOR GEORGE CLINTON OR IN HIS ABSENCE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR VAN 13 CORTLANDT Head Quarters, Prackness, October 29, 1780. Sir: I have the honor to transmit your Excellency the proceedings of the Court Martial upon Joshua 14 Smith; by which you will perceive out of four charges exhibited against him the Jurisdiction of the Court was only found competent to one, of which they 11. In the writing of Tench Tilghman. 13. Lieut. Gov. Pierre Van Cortlandt. 14. Joshua Hett Smith. George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4 http://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw3c.004 15 have acquitted him for want of sufficient evidence. As he was brought out of Your State into this for trial, I have thought proper to send him back to West Point. I think it necessary to inform you, that he will be shortly released from confinement unless the Civil Authority should interpose to 16 demand him. I have the honor etc. 17 P.S. When you have considered the Proceedings you will please to return them. To GOVERNOR JOHN HANCOCK Head Quarters, October 31, 1780. Sir: Upon the representation of Mr. Morey that two Negro Men belonging to him, were detained as Soldiers in the Massachusetts Line contrary to his inclination, I gave directions to Brigadier General Glover to appoint a Board of Officers to enquire into the Justice of his claim and to report the facts with their opinion thereon. A Copy of this Report I now do Myself the honor to inclose to you. As Mr Morey is a subject of your State, and the question appears to be how far the several circumstances stated in the Report ought to affect his property I have thought proper to refer the matter to Your opinion; having no object in view but 15. New Jersey. 16. Smith was imprisoned by the civil authority of New York, but escaped before he was brought to trial and succeeded in getting into New York City. 17. In the writing of David Humphreys. From a photostat in the Washington Papers. a desire that equal justice may be done to the public and the individual concerned. I have the honor 37 etc. To GOVERNOR JONATHAN TRUMBULL Head Quarters near Passaic Falls, November 1, 1780. George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4 http://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw3c.004 Dear Sir: I was yesterday honored with your Excellency's favor of the 27th. ulto. The letters inclosed for the president of Congress were immediately forwarded by Express. I am happy in believing that the dispatches for which you are apprehensive were not in the Mail lately lost at Stratford as the new Regulations for the Army were not compleated when that post left Philadelphia. They were finished the 21st ulto. and I hope will reach most of the Legislatures during their Fall Session. I have the honor etc. P.S. I transmitted Your Excellency some very important dispatches on the 18th: ulto. I hope they have 64 got safe to hand. 37. The draft is in the writing of David Humphreys. 64. In the writing of Tench Tilghman. From the original in the Connecticut State Library. 74 To REVEREND DIRCK ROMEYN Head Quarters, Colo. Dey's, November 3, 1780. Sir: His Excellency General Washington has been informed, within two days past, that another embarkation, under the command of Sir Henry Clinton in person, is preparing at New York. Should this be so, it is more than probable that you will have heard something of it, as the Communication between Hackensack and Bergen is frequent. You will be good enough to let me know, by return of the Bearer, whether any thing of the kind has come to your knowledge, with any particulars which you may have collected. Should you at any time in future gain any intelligence, which you may think material, you will oblige His Excellency and render essential public service by communicating it to 75 him. I am etc. To PRESIDENT JOSEPH REED Head Quarters, Prekaness, November 4, 1780. 78 Dear Sir: I have received information from New York that a person who is called George Fustner, 79 and who is Brother in law to Rankin formerly of York County, comes frequently out as a Spy by George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3C, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 4 http://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw3c.004 74. Of the Dutch Reformed Church, Hackensack, N. J. 75. The draft is in the writing of and is signed “T. Tilghman, A. D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Fifth" Maryland at Guilford Courthouse: an Exercise in Historical Accuracy - L
    HOME CMTE. SUBMISSIONS THE "FIFTH" MARYLAND AT GUILFORD COURTHOUSE: AN EXERCISE IN HISTORICAL ACCURACY - L. E. Babits, February 1988 Over the years, an error has gradually crept into the history of the Maryland Line. The error involves a case of mistaken regimental identity in which the Fifth Maryland is credited with participation in the battle of Guilford Courthouse at the expense of the Second Maryland.[1] When this error appeared in the Maryland Historical Magazine,[2] it seemed time to set the record straight. The various errors seem to originate with Mark Boatner. In his Encyclopedia of the American Revolution, Boatner, while describing the fight at Guilford Courthouse, states: As the 2/Gds prepared to attack without waiting for the three other regiments to arrive, Otho Williams, "charmed with the late demeanor of the first regiment (I Md), hastened toward the second (5th Md) expecting a similar display...". But the 5th Maryland was virtually a new regiment. "The sight of the scarlet and steel was too much for their nerves," says Ward.[3] In this paragraph Boatner demonstrates an ignorance of the actual command and organizational structure of Greene's Southern Army because he quotes from Ward's l94l work on the Delaware Line and Henry Lee's recollections of the war, both of which correctly identify the unit in question as the Second Maryland Regiment.[4] The writer of the Kerrenhappuch Turner article simply referred to Boatner's general reference on the Revolutionary War for the regimental designation.[5] Other writers have done
    [Show full text]
  • The Mutinies of 1781
    THE MUTINIES OF 1781 Two mutinies of Continental Line troops occurred in January 1781 as a consequence of a lack of food, spirits, clothing, and pay for at least a year. While these harsh conditions were not unique for that time, the first mutiny led to but only a second that was dramatically quelled in short order. Six reGiments of the Pennsylvania Line were winter-quartered south of Morristown, New Jersey, under the command of General Anthony Wayne. On New Year’s Day, January 1, 1781, soldiers from the regiments of the Line mutinied to seek redress for their sufferinG state. DurinG the initial uprisinG, two officers, a Lieutenant White and Captain Samuel Tolbert, were seriously wounded, with a third, Captain Alan BittinG/Bettin of the 4th Regiment, killed. After taking a cannon, the mutineers marched directly to Princeton to air their grievances. There, a board of sergeants was selected, headed by Sergeant William Bouzar, which then met with the President of the Supreme Executive Council of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Joseph Reed. Following the initial meeting, Reed met with delegates of the Continental Congress at Trenton. Reed seems to have found their demands compellinG. Subsequently, the troop marched to Trenton for a continuation of the neGotiations. There, a Commission was created to consider mainly their one complaint concerning bounties paid out to enlistees in 1776 and 1777. Following the Commission’s review, immediate discharges were Granted to those three-year men whose enlistments were over. Each was promised partial payment of back pay in addition to items of need.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Deprived of Their Liberty'
    'DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY': ENEMY PRISONERS AND THE CULTURE OF WAR IN REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA, 1775-1783 by Trenton Cole Jones A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June, 2014 © 2014 Trenton Cole Jones All Rights Reserved Abstract Deprived of Their Liberty explores Americans' changing conceptions of legitimate wartime violence by analyzing how the revolutionaries treated their captured enemies, and by asking what their treatment can tell us about the American Revolution more broadly. I suggest that at the commencement of conflict, the revolutionary leadership sought to contain the violence of war according to the prevailing customs of warfare in Europe. These rules of war—or to phrase it differently, the cultural norms of war— emphasized restricting the violence of war to the battlefield and treating enemy prisoners humanely. Only six years later, however, captured British soldiers and seamen, as well as civilian loyalists, languished on board noisome prison ships in Massachusetts and New York, in the lead mines of Connecticut, the jails of Pennsylvania, and the camps of Virginia and Maryland, where they were deprived of their liberty and often their lives by the very government purporting to defend those inalienable rights. My dissertation explores this curious, and heretofore largely unrecognized, transformation in the revolutionaries' conduct of war by looking at the experience of captivity in American hands. Throughout the dissertation, I suggest three principal factors to account for the escalation of violence during the war. From the onset of hostilities, the revolutionaries encountered an obstinate enemy that denied them the status of legitimate combatants, labeling them as rebels and traitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in Maryland
    Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in Maryland Founding the Proprietary Colony The founding and establishment of the propriety government of Maryland was the product of competing factors—political, commercial, social, and religious. It was intertwined with the history of one family, the Calverts, who were well established among the Yorkshire gentry and whose Catholic sympathies were widely known. George Calvert had been a favorite of the Stuart king, James I. In 1625, following a noteworthy career in politics, including periods as clerk of the Privy Council, member of Parliament, special emissary abroad of the king, and a principal secretary of state, Calvert openly declared his Catholicism. This declaration closed any future possibility of public office for him. Shortly thereafter, James elevated Calvert to the Irish peerage as the baron of Baltimore. Calvert’s absence from public office afforded him an opportunity to pursue his interests in overseas colonization. Calvert appealed to Charles I, son of James, for a land grant.1 Calvert’s appeal was honored, but he did not live to see a charter issued. In 1632, Charles granted a proprietary charter to Cecil Calvert, George’s son and the second baron of Baltimore, making him Maryland’s first proprietor. Maryland’s charter was the first long-lasting one of its kind to be issued among the thirteen mainland British American colonies. Proprietorships represented a real share in the king’s authority. They extended unusual power. Maryland’s charter, which constituted Calvert and his heirs as “the true and absolute Lords and Proprietaries of the Region,” might have been “the best example of a sweeping grant of power to a proprietor.” Proprietors could award land grants, confer titles, and establish courts, which included the prerogative of hearing appeals.
    [Show full text]
  • Royall Tyler, the Contrast
    Royall Tyler, The Contrast Tyler, Royall . The Contrast: A Comedy Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library About the electronic version The Contrast: A Comedy Tyler, Royall Creation of machine-readable version: Judy Boss Creation of digital images: Greg Murray, Electronic Text Center Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup: University of Virginia Library Electronic Text Center. ca. 190 kilobytes This version available from the University of Virginia Library Charlottesville, Virginia Publicly-accessible 1998 Note: This electronic text was created from a 1970 reprint (of an edition published in 1887) published by Burt Franklin, New York. However, the electronic text was checked against the 1887 edition published by The Dunlap Society, New York. Digital images accompanying the etext are from this 1887 Dunlap Society edition. The following errors in the print source have been corrected in this electronic version: p.xi, n.1, item 3: Tragedy”] Tragedy’; p.xxxv: Hugh Sherwood Esq.] Hugh Sherwood, Esq.; p.xxxvii: Hamilton Young, Esq., New York.] Hamilton Young, Esq., New-York.; p.57: I for what?] I; for what?; p.64: a happy people] a happy people.; p.74: most be very stupid] must be very stupid About the print version The Contrast: A Comedy Royall Tyler Introduction by Thomas J. McKee Burt Franklin New York 1970 BURT FRANKLIN: RESEARCH & SOURCE WORKS SERIES 573; Theatre & Drama Series 12 Prepared for the University of Virginia Library Electronic Text Center. Some keywords in the header are a local Electronic Text Center scheme to aid in establishing analytical groupings. Published: 1787 English fiction drama masculine LCSH unknown illustration 24- bit, 400 dpi Revisions to the electronic version April 1998 corrector Greg Murray, Electronic Text CenterAdded TEI header and tags.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Registration in Medicine
    PUBLIC DOCUMENT . No. 56. NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ¡ova, Board of Registration in Medicine. J a n u a r y , 1903. BOSTON : WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS, 18 P ost Offic e Square. 1903. APPBÎ>VjM> BY BÓARft’ Of/ P iTb t rt\iT j&n (ÌGmmnntomllf} of litas saxjjtisitls B o a r d o f R egistration in M e d ic in e , S t a t e H o u s e , D ec. 31, 1902. To His Excellency W. M u r r a y C r a n e , Governor. Sir : — The number of persons applying for registration this year is 390, all of whom except 6 have been examined. The number of applicants on the rejected lists of this and previous years who have been re-examined this year is 96, a small per­ centage of whom have been registered. The whole number of individual examinations given during the year is 480. The result of the several examinations is shown in tabular form, as follows : — Examined. Registered. Rejected. P ercentage rejected. March examination,.............................................. 96 54 42 44 May e x a m i n a t i o n , ............................................... 52 35 17 32 Ju ly exam ination...................................................... 178 133 45 25 September exam ination,..................................... 75 50 25 32 November exam ination,..................................... 79 49 30 38 T o ta ls ,................................................................. 480 321 159 33 In the following tabulated statement a few applicants who failed in their original examination this year, but who were successful in a re-examination, are included : — Y ear of N um ber N um ber Graduation of Name of Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3A, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 6
    George Washington Papers, Series 3, Subseries 3A, Varick Transcripts, Letterbook 6 To THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS Head Quarters, New Windsor, March 1, 1781. Sir: The inclosed memorial of Colo. Hazen was this day put into my hands. Many of the matters mentioned in it are better known to Congress than to myself. The whole are so fully stated, as to speak for themselves, and require only the determination of Congress. The case of the Canadian Officers and Soldiers I know to be peculiarly distressing and truly entitled to redress, if the means are to be obtained. The Regiment, not being appropriated to any State, must soon dwindle into nothing, unless some effectual mode can be devised for recruiting it. Colo. Hazens pretensions to promotion seems to me to have weight, but how far they ought to be admitted, the general principles which Congress mean to adopt for the regulation of this important point will best decide. In justice to Colo. Hazen, I must testify, that he has always appeared to me a sensible, 83 spirited and attentive Officer. I have the honor etc. To THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS Head Quarters, New Windsor, March 1, 1781. Sir: On opening the inclosed, I found it intended for 83. In the writing of Tench Tilghman. The letter was read in Congress on March 23 and referred to Artemas Ward, John Sullivan, and Isaac Motte. your Excellency, though addressed to me. I intend setting out in the morning for Newport to confer with the French General and Admiral upon the operations of the ensuing Campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Mail Bag Governor Thomas Sim Lee's Correspondence 1779 -1782 from Original Pencil Drawing Hy Robert S
    REVOLUTIONARY MAIL BAG GOVERNOR THOMAS SIM LEE'S CORRESPONDENCE 1779 -1782 FROM ORIGINAL PENCIL DRAWING HY ROBERT S. PEABODY, IN POSSESSION OE AUTHOR. REVOLUTIONARY MAIL BAG: GOVERNOR THOMAS SIM LEE'S CORRESPONDENCE, 1779-1782 Edited by HELEN LEE PEABODY HE contents of a chest of several hundred unpublished letters T and papers, belonging to Thomas Sim Lee, Governor of Maryland during the American Revolution, form the basis of the following pages.1 The chest, containing these letters and private papers, together with the rest of his personal possessions, was inherited by his youngest son, John Lee, the only unmarried child still living with his father at the time of his death. John Lee, my grandfather, left his inheritance, the old family mansion, " Needwood," in Frederick County, and all it contained, to my father, Charles Carroll Lee. In this manner the chest of letters descended to the present generation. 1 There is no life of Lee. Standard accounts are to be found in the Dictionary of American Biography, XI, 132, and H.E. Buchholz, Governors of Maryland (Baltimore, 1908), pp. 9-13. 1 2 MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE The papers—designated hereafter as the T. S. Lee Collection— when found, comprised over a thousand items. The papers were arranged in packages, tied with tape, and tabulated, which facili­ tated the onerous task of sorting and reading. Many had to be laid aside, as totally unsuited to a compilation of this kind. These comprised invoices, bills of lading, acknowledgements by London firms of hogsheads of tobacco received, orders for furniture, clothing, household utensils—all, in short, that made up the inter­ change of life between our Colonial ancestors and British mer­ chants.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY Quarterly Bulletin
    THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY Quarterly Bulletin VOLUME XXIII JULY, 1939 NUMBER THREE POOL IN THE SOCIETY'S GARDEN WITH ANNA HYATT HUNTINGTON'S "DIANA OF THE CHASE" Gift of a Member of the Society, 1939 UBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY AND ISSUED TO MEMBERS Mew York: iyo Central Park West HOURS 0 THE ART GALLERIES AND MUSEUM Open free to the public daily except Monday. Weekdays: from 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and holidays from 1 to 5 P.M. THE LIBRARY Open daily except Sunday from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. Holidays: from 1 to 5 P.M. HOLIDAYS The Art Galleries, Museum, and Library are open on holidays from* 1 to 5 P.M., except on New Year's Day, July Fourth, Thanksgiving, and Christmas, when the building is closed. EGYPTIAN COLLECTIONS The Egyptian Collections of The New-York Historical Society are on exhibition daily in the Brooklyn Museum, Eastern Parkway and Washington Avenue, Brooklyn, N. Y. Open weekdays, from 10 to 5; Sundays, from 2 to 6. Free, except Mondays and Fridays. THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY, 170 CENTRAL PARK WEST John Jfted OJtekes 1856-1959 T is with profound sorrow that the Society records the death in New York City on May 4, 1939, of Mr. John I Abeel Weekes, President of the Society from 1913 to April, 1939. Mr. Weekes was born at Oyster Bay, Long Island, July 24, 1856, son of John Abeel Weekes and Alice Howland Delano, his wife, and grandson of Robert Doughty Weekes, first president of the New York Stock Exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Has Governor's Unmarked Grave Been Found?
    Has governor's unmarked grave been found? Posted by Dick Myers On 01/06/2016 Site of presumed location of Gov. George Plater, III's grave at Sotterley Plantation in Hollywood. Hollywood, MD -- On a windswept February morning more than 200 years ago, Maryland’s leaders huddled together outside the State House. Inside, lying in state, was the body of Governor George Plater III, dead as of the night before. Elected in December, 1791, sickness had ended his term only three months in. Now, the final preparations were being made to transport his body back to Sotterley, his ancestral home in St. Mary’s County. As the casket was borne outside into the cold, the assembled mourners took up their positions around it. Then the procession, with the governor in the center, slowly made its way to the Annapolis docks, where a boat was ready to take Plater’s body to its final resting place. As it left the dock, the official record of what happened to Governor Plater’s body ends. In the last 223 years, no definitive evidence until now has ever been put forward that proves where the Governor was buried… until now. In life, George Plater III (shown at left) loomed as one of colonial Maryland’s leading figures before, during, and immediately after the Revolutionary War. George Plater III, only son of George Plater II, was born in 1736 in St. Mary’s County. Educated at his father's estate at Sotterley Plantation, he graduated from the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia in 1752.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
    [Show full text]