Has Governor's Unmarked Grave Been Found?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Has Governor's Unmarked Grave Been Found? Has governor's unmarked grave been found? Posted by Dick Myers On 01/06/2016 Site of presumed location of Gov. George Plater, III's grave at Sotterley Plantation in Hollywood. Hollywood, MD -- On a windswept February morning more than 200 years ago, Maryland’s leaders huddled together outside the State House. Inside, lying in state, was the body of Governor George Plater III, dead as of the night before. Elected in December, 1791, sickness had ended his term only three months in. Now, the final preparations were being made to transport his body back to Sotterley, his ancestral home in St. Mary’s County. As the casket was borne outside into the cold, the assembled mourners took up their positions around it. Then the procession, with the governor in the center, slowly made its way to the Annapolis docks, where a boat was ready to take Plater’s body to its final resting place. As it left the dock, the official record of what happened to Governor Plater’s body ends. In the last 223 years, no definitive evidence until now has ever been put forward that proves where the Governor was buried… until now. In life, George Plater III (shown at left) loomed as one of colonial Maryland’s leading figures before, during, and immediately after the Revolutionary War. George Plater III, only son of George Plater II, was born in 1736 in St. Mary’s County. Educated at his father's estate at Sotterley Plantation, he graduated from the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia in 1752. Six years later he was elected to the colonial House of Delegates. He was afterwards made the king’s naval officer of the Patuxent, a judge of the Provincial Court, and a member of the Governor’s Council. When the Revolutionary War erupted, Plater fell on the side of the pro-independence patriots. The Southern Marylander became, during the war years, a member of Maryland's Council of Safety and a member of the Constitutional Convention of Maryland. Later, after the war, he was a member and, ultimately, president of the Maryland Senate, a delegate to the Continental Congress, a member of Maryland’s convention for the ratification of the Constitution of the United States, and a Presidential Elector when Washington ascended to the office in 1789. The pinnacle of his career came at the end, when finally, almost forty years after serving in his first public office, he was elected Governor of Maryland in 1792. No other contemporary statesman with similar accomplishments has an end as mysterious as Plater’s. As said above, when Governor Plater died on February 10, 1792 his body lay in state for a day, then was carried in a public procession to the Annapolis docks, to be loaded on a ship bound for Sotterley. No direct evidence remains of what happened to the Governor’s body after that ship departed Annapolis, or where he was ultimately buried. Many different theories have been suggested. One theory puts Plater's gravesite at an abandoned church in modern-day Hollywood, Maryland, alongside his father's grave; another at a different church Governor Plater helped build and for which he served as a vestryman; and yet one more places him in another church graveyard, in modern-day Medley's Neck. In none of these locations, though, has a headstone for Governor Plater ever been found, nor was there any mention of his death or burial in the parish records. Many stories and tales suggest instead that Governor Plater’s body never left Sotterley at all after the ship unloaded his body at its dock. As these legends have it, the Governor was buried somewhere on his own land, and more than a little evidence supports the idea. Governor Plater, one of the wealthiest men in Southern Maryland, certainly had the means to afford burial on his own land. Doing so was a common custom at the time, and many estates as large as Sotterley housed graveyards for the families who owned them. Though no headstone for George Plater III has ever been found, an early 1800s deed of sale makes reference to a Plater family graveyard located north of Sotterley; one of the conditions of the sale was that the Platers would be allowed to visit the graves of their ancestors. That sale was completed, but after the estate left the Plater’s hands their family graveyard fell into disuse. Some references to it remain; a few years after the plantation was sold by the Platers it became the property of the Briscoe family. One story has Dr. Walter Hanson Stone Briscoe scolding his kids for playing underneath a cherry tree near the main house; the reason for the doctor’s ban, evidently, was that “the governor was buried underneath.” It stands to reason that Dr. Briscoe, only two decades removed from the Sotterley’s ownership by the Platers, should know who was buried on his property. No cherry tree from the 1840s remains on Sotterley’s grounds today, but a likely location for the governor’s grave stands out nonetheless. The Briscoe family kept ownership of Sotterley until the early 1900s, when they sold the declining farm to a wealthy New York lawyer named Herbert Satterlee, a son-in-law of J.P. Morgan, and a future Assistant Secretary of the Navy. Satterlee, convinced there was a connection between his family’s name and the name of Sotterley, bought the property with the idea of restoring it to its former glory. This he did, completely renovating the main house, modernizing the farm, and putting many acres of the farmland back into production. It was the latter that led to the next clue about Governor Plater’s burial place. An oral history has it that, while plowing land north of the main house which the Briscoes, for unknown reasons, never plowed during their ownership, a tenant farmer walking behind a horse-drawn plough suddenly called for Herbert Satterlee. The plough had struck a coffin lid in the middle of the field. The same oral history claims that Herbert Satterlee believed the coffin was Governor Plater’s. The coffin, its nails, and the black plate on it all bore hallmarks of a style popular at the time of the governor’s death. The location of the gravesite, a few hundred feet from the main house and on the cusp of a hill overlooking the Patuxent, seemed perfect. Immediate plans were made by Satterlee and the Maryland legislature to construct a monument to Governor Plater on the site, but, as the ploughman told it, at the last minute Satterlee changed his mind. Satterlee had bought the farm as an escape from New York City, and as a place he and his family could go for quiet and peace during the summertime. The monument, he feared, might attract crowds of people, and that cars and tourists would bustle past his front gate on their way to visit the resting place of one of Maryland’s great revolutionary leaders. And so with that thought in mind, Satterlee ordered the ploughman to rebury the coffin, to leave the site unmarked, and to keep quiet what he found; so the story goes. Several decades later, after Satterlee’s death, the ploughman eventually revealed his secret discovery, and enough details are there for visitors to follow in his footsteps. To read his full account for yourself, read Chapter 7 of the John Hanson Briscoe Historical Project, “Sotterley - Sites Unseen,” at http://www.baldwinbriscoe.com/sd/pgs/John-Hanson-Briscoe-Historical-Project.aspx John Sterling Houser assisted in research for this article and for the John Hanson Briscoe Historical Project. Page 1 Copyright © 2021 thebaynet.com. All rights reserved. Page 2.
Recommended publications
  • "Fifth" Maryland at Guilford Courthouse: an Exercise in Historical Accuracy - L
    HOME CMTE. SUBMISSIONS THE "FIFTH" MARYLAND AT GUILFORD COURTHOUSE: AN EXERCISE IN HISTORICAL ACCURACY - L. E. Babits, February 1988 Over the years, an error has gradually crept into the history of the Maryland Line. The error involves a case of mistaken regimental identity in which the Fifth Maryland is credited with participation in the battle of Guilford Courthouse at the expense of the Second Maryland.[1] When this error appeared in the Maryland Historical Magazine,[2] it seemed time to set the record straight. The various errors seem to originate with Mark Boatner. In his Encyclopedia of the American Revolution, Boatner, while describing the fight at Guilford Courthouse, states: As the 2/Gds prepared to attack without waiting for the three other regiments to arrive, Otho Williams, "charmed with the late demeanor of the first regiment (I Md), hastened toward the second (5th Md) expecting a similar display...". But the 5th Maryland was virtually a new regiment. "The sight of the scarlet and steel was too much for their nerves," says Ward.[3] In this paragraph Boatner demonstrates an ignorance of the actual command and organizational structure of Greene's Southern Army because he quotes from Ward's l94l work on the Delaware Line and Henry Lee's recollections of the war, both of which correctly identify the unit in question as the Second Maryland Regiment.[4] The writer of the Kerrenhappuch Turner article simply referred to Boatner's general reference on the Revolutionary War for the regimental designation.[5] Other writers have done
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in Maryland
    Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in Maryland Founding the Proprietary Colony The founding and establishment of the propriety government of Maryland was the product of competing factors—political, commercial, social, and religious. It was intertwined with the history of one family, the Calverts, who were well established among the Yorkshire gentry and whose Catholic sympathies were widely known. George Calvert had been a favorite of the Stuart king, James I. In 1625, following a noteworthy career in politics, including periods as clerk of the Privy Council, member of Parliament, special emissary abroad of the king, and a principal secretary of state, Calvert openly declared his Catholicism. This declaration closed any future possibility of public office for him. Shortly thereafter, James elevated Calvert to the Irish peerage as the baron of Baltimore. Calvert’s absence from public office afforded him an opportunity to pursue his interests in overseas colonization. Calvert appealed to Charles I, son of James, for a land grant.1 Calvert’s appeal was honored, but he did not live to see a charter issued. In 1632, Charles granted a proprietary charter to Cecil Calvert, George’s son and the second baron of Baltimore, making him Maryland’s first proprietor. Maryland’s charter was the first long-lasting one of its kind to be issued among the thirteen mainland British American colonies. Proprietorships represented a real share in the king’s authority. They extended unusual power. Maryland’s charter, which constituted Calvert and his heirs as “the true and absolute Lords and Proprietaries of the Region,” might have been “the best example of a sweeping grant of power to a proprietor.” Proprietors could award land grants, confer titles, and establish courts, which included the prerogative of hearing appeals.
    [Show full text]
  • Royall Tyler, the Contrast
    Royall Tyler, The Contrast Tyler, Royall . The Contrast: A Comedy Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library About the electronic version The Contrast: A Comedy Tyler, Royall Creation of machine-readable version: Judy Boss Creation of digital images: Greg Murray, Electronic Text Center Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup: University of Virginia Library Electronic Text Center. ca. 190 kilobytes This version available from the University of Virginia Library Charlottesville, Virginia Publicly-accessible 1998 Note: This electronic text was created from a 1970 reprint (of an edition published in 1887) published by Burt Franklin, New York. However, the electronic text was checked against the 1887 edition published by The Dunlap Society, New York. Digital images accompanying the etext are from this 1887 Dunlap Society edition. The following errors in the print source have been corrected in this electronic version: p.xi, n.1, item 3: Tragedy”] Tragedy’; p.xxxv: Hugh Sherwood Esq.] Hugh Sherwood, Esq.; p.xxxvii: Hamilton Young, Esq., New York.] Hamilton Young, Esq., New-York.; p.57: I for what?] I; for what?; p.64: a happy people] a happy people.; p.74: most be very stupid] must be very stupid About the print version The Contrast: A Comedy Royall Tyler Introduction by Thomas J. McKee Burt Franklin New York 1970 BURT FRANKLIN: RESEARCH & SOURCE WORKS SERIES 573; Theatre & Drama Series 12 Prepared for the University of Virginia Library Electronic Text Center. Some keywords in the header are a local Electronic Text Center scheme to aid in establishing analytical groupings. Published: 1787 English fiction drama masculine LCSH unknown illustration 24- bit, 400 dpi Revisions to the electronic version April 1998 corrector Greg Murray, Electronic Text CenterAdded TEI header and tags.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1911, Volume 6, Issue No. 2
    /V\5A.SC 5^1- i^^ MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Voi,. VI. JUNE, 1911. No. 2. THE MARYLAND GUARD BATTALION, 1860-61.1 ISAAC F. NICHOLSON. (Bead before the Society April 10, 1911.) After an interval of fifty years, it is permitted the writer to avail of the pen to present to a new generation a modest record of a military organization of most brilliant promise— but whose career was brought to a sudden close after a life of but fifteen months. The years 1858 and 1859 were years of very grave import in the history of our city. Local political conditions had become almost unendurable, the oitizens were intensely incensed and outraged, and were one to ask for a reason for the formation of an additional military organization in those days, a simple reference to the prevailing conditions would be ample reply. For several years previous the City had been ruled by the American or Know Nothing Party who dominated it by violence through the medium of a partisan police and disorderly political clubs. No man of opposing politics, however respectable, ever undertook to cast his vote without danger to his life. 'The corporate name of this organization was "The Maryland Guard" of Baltimore City. Its motto, " Decus et Prsesidium." 117 118 MAEYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZIlfE. The situation was intolerable, and the State at large having gone Democratic, some of our best citizens turned to the Legis- lature for relief and drafted and had passed an Election Law which provided for fair elections, and a Police Law, which took the control of that department from the City and placed it in the hands of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • East of Junction of Maryland Route #245 and Vista Road, 3
    SM-7 Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Maryland COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES St. Mary's INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NFS ENTRY NUMBER \ -~~\ EWVfelC (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) Sotterley AND/OR H.STORIC: Sotterley)Manor, Sotterley Plantation, Resurrection Manor, {Bowles' SeparationX Bowles"1 Plantation____________ liilliliii^ STREET AND NUMBER: Eas t of j unction of Maryland Route #245 and Vista Road, 3 miles east of Maryland Route #235______ CITY OR TOWN: Hollywood COUNTY: Maryland 24 st 037 CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC District (2J Building Public Public Acquisition: J2JJ Occupied Yes: O Restricted Site Q Structure Private || In Process II Unoccupied JX) Unrestricted D Object Both [ | Being Considered Q Preservation work in progress D No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) 52 Agricultural O Government |~1 Park I I Transportation I | Comments | | Commercial I I Industrial ££] Private Residence n Other (Specify) Q Educational l~) Military | | Religious 28 Entertainment S Museum llOUSe d Scientific Sotterley Mansion Foundation, Inc. President: (Mrs.) Mabel Satterlee Ingalls STREET AND NUMBER: Sotterley Cl TY OR TOWN: Hollywood Maryland. 24 COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: en 8 Hall of Records z STREET AND NUMBER: S < St. John's College Campus, College Avenue Cl TY OR TOWN: Annapolis Maryland 24 en TITLE OF SURVEY: Historic American Building Survey DATE OF SURVEY: 1969 Fedc State | | County | | Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: Library of Congress M'a STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: Washington Dist.of Columbia 11 '$> SM-7 (Check One) Excellent D Good Fair | | Deteriorated G Ruins [I Unexposed ^•v PONDITIOFTO| (Check One) (Check One) *> V Altered Q Unaltered Moved[% Original Site PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (if known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE .,--\^/Sotterley is located northeast of Maryland Route 245, ^LLQ*tt£ee miles northeast of the intersection of Maryland 245 and Maryland Route 235 at Hollywood, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Letters of George Plater
    (front cover) The Letters of George Plater David G. Brown The Letters of George Plater Compiled and Annotated by David G. Brown Copyright: Historic Sotterley, 2013 This book may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. Preface This collection of George Plater’s letters is a companion publication to the book, George Plater of Sotterley, published in 2014 by the Chesapeake Book Company. Like all gentlemen of his age, Plater relied on letters as his primary connection with distant family, friends and acquaintances. As strange as it may seem in the interconnected twenty-first century, letters were the only way to stay connected other than word-of-mouth news conveyed by traveling friends. Letters are also a primary source for historians trying to understand an individual’s character and thinking. Fortunately, some of George Plater’s letters have survived the two centuries since his death. These fall into two categories: letters he wrote in various official capacities, for example, as Continental Congress delegate, senate president or governor, and his personal letters. Many of his official letters are available in original records and collections of documents. But even in this group many no longer exist. Some of those missing are historically significant. An example would be the report he sent to the governor and Assembly in his capacity as president of the Maryland Convention that ratified the U.S. Constitution. When this report was received, the Maryland Senate instructed the governor and council to preserve it. Nevertheless, it has been lost. Other lost official letters reported on important developments with which Plater was involved at the Continental Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1920, Volume 15, Issue No. 1
    {m-i-sy MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHOEITy OP THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME XV BALTIMORE 1920 ARCHIVES OF MARYLAND IPioblislied. toy authority of the State VOLUME XXXIX This volume is now ready for distribution, and contains the Acts and Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Province, during the Sessions held from 1732/3 to 1736. During this period, Samuel Ogle was Governor, and he met difficult situations with tact and firmness. In 1733, a very important act was passed for emitting bills of credit, under which a considerable amount of paper money was issued, with such wise measures for the establishment of a sinking fund, that the bills were finally redeemed. An important militia act was passed, as also was one for the improvement of the navigation of the Patuxent River. Towns were erected at Elkridge Landing, on the site of Princess Anne, etc. A general law for the relief of insolvent debtors completes the important legislation of the Session. The Session of 1733/4 lasted only six days, when the Governor dissolved the Assembly, because the Lower House expelled four members, who had accepted office from the Proprietary. A year later, a new Assembly was convened without great change in the membership. It did the surprising act of electing Daniel Dulany, one of the expelled members, as its speaker, and, when he declined, chose James Harris, a new member, though Colonel John Mackall, the old speaker had been re-elected to the Assembly. A general naturalization law was then passed, and the importa- tion of negroes, "Irish Papists," and liquors was restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 SOTTERLEY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: SOTTERLEY Other Name/Site Number: Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties SM-7 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 44300 Sotterley Lane; P. O. Box 67 Not for publication: n/a City/Town: Hollywood Vicinity: x State: MD County: St. Mary's Code: 037 Zip Code: 20636 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: x Building(s): _ Public-Local: __ District: x Public-State: __ Site: _ Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object: _ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 15 11 buildings __ sites __ structures __ objects 23 11 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 20 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: n/a Designated a NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK on FEB 1 6 2000 by the Sscratary of the Interior NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 SOTTERLEY Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_____________________________________National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1976, Volume 71, Issue No. 2
    ARYLAND AZIN N Published Quarterly by the Maryland Historical Society SUMMER 1976 Vol. 71, No. 2 BOARD OF EDITORS JOSEPH L. ARNOLD, University of Maryland, Baltimore County JEAN BAKER, Goucher College GARY BROWNE, Wayne State University JOSEPH W. COX, Towson State College CURTIS CARROLL DAVIS, Baltimore RICHARD R. DUNCAN. Georgetown University RONALD HOFFMAN, University of Maryland, College Park H. H. WALKER LEWIS, Baltimore EDWARD C. PAPENFUSE, Hall of Records BENJAMIN QUARLES, Morgan State College JOHN B. BOLES. Editor, Towson State College NANCY G. BOLES, Assistant Editor RICHARD J. COX, Manuscripts MARY K. MEYER, Genealogy MARY KATHLEEN THOMSEN, Graphics FORMER EDITORS WILLIAM HAND BROWNE, 1906-1909 LOUIS H, DIELMAN, 1910-1937 JAMES W. FOSTER, 1938-1949, 1950-1951 HARRY AMMON, 1950 FRED SHELLEY, 1951-1955 FRANCIS C. HABER, 1955-1958 RICHARD WALSH, 1958-1967 RICHARD R. DUNCAN, 1967-1974 P. WILLIAM FILBY, Director ROMAINE S. SOMERVILLE, Assistant Director The Maryland Historical Magazine is published quarterly by the Maryland Historical Society, 201 W. Monument Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. Contributions and correspondence relating to articles, book reviews, and any other editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor in care of the Society. All contributions should be submitted in duplicate, double-spaced, and consistent with the form out- lined in A Manual of Style (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969). The Maryland Historical Society disclaims responsibility for statements made by contributors. Composed and printed at Waverly Press. Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21202. Second-class postage paid at Baltimore, Maryland. © 1976, Maryland Historical Society. K^A ^ 5^'l-2tSZ. I HALL OF RECORDS LIBRARY MARYLAND "^ TSTOBTr/^frQUS, MARYLAND No.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1918, Volume 13, Issue No. 1
    rV boo MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE PnBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHOKITY OP THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME XIII BALTIMORE 1918 CONTENTS OF VOLUME XIII PAGE THE RETBEAT FEOM PETEESBTJBG TO APPOMATOX. Joseph Packard, 1 HON. DANIEI, DULANY, 1685-1753 (The Elder). Richard Henry Spencer, 20 COMMITTEE OF OBSEBVATION FOE ELIZABETH TOWN DISTBICT. From MSS. in possession of the Society, .... 28, 227 THE CAREOIX PAPEBS. From MSS. im possession of tfte Society, 54, 171, 24ft PBOCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, 77, 183 LIST OF MEMBEBS OF THE SOCIETY, 84 KILTY'S MANUSCRIPT TBAVESTY OF THE Iliad. H. L. Koopman, 103 CHIEF JUSTICE ROQEE B. TANEY; HIS CAREER AT THE FREDERICK BAR. Edward S. Delaplaine, 109 HON. DANIEL DULANY, 1722-1797 (The Younger). Richard Henry Spencer, 143 TANEY LETTERS. Frow MSS. in possession of the Society, - - 160 THE WASHINGTON MONUMENT AND SQUARES. McHenry Howard, 179 EARLY SETTLERS OF THE SITE OF HAVRE DE GRACE. William B. Marye, 197 PULASKI'S LEGION. Richard Henry Spencer, .... 214 THE SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES IN 1833, AS SEEN BY A NEW ENG- LANDER. Henry Barnard. Edited by Bernard C. Steiner, 267, 29 THE CROMWELL FAMILY. Francis B. Culver, .... 386 MAKYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE VOL. XIII. MARCH, 1918. No. 1. THE EETEEAT PROM PETEESBUKG TO APPOMATTOX —PEESONAL EECOLLECTIONS.* JOSEPH PACKARD, ESQ. I assure you, gentlemen, that it wasn't without reluctance that I accepted the invitation which Dr. Welch and Mr. Haman gave me to say something about my recollections of some of the military incidents of the Civil War. This stupendous war which is being waged now all over the world is so different in scale and in methods from our war, that it is almost, as I said to Dr.
    [Show full text]