DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1 – Parish Council Responses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1 – Parish Council Responses Appendix 1 – Parish Council responses Oakley Parish Council Initial Comments Object: “The Planning Committee of the Oakley and Deane Parish Council met last evening and discussed the above application. The members object to the application, for the following reasons: The closure of Roman Road will be a huge mistake. The safety issues at Wellington Terrace are undoubtedly important but to close the access to the A339 will make the Main Street slow and congested, and add time to journeys from Oakley , Overton and Whitchurch to the hospital, to Chineham and Reading etc. Re the traffic control from the closed off Roman Road to Main Street – it is not clear from the application how this will be managed. Traffic flows from Oakley, Overton and Whitchurch do not take into account all the new developments agreed in the Local Plan (a total of 870 new homes). The projected Main Street traffic flows appear to ignore all traffic from Oakley and Overton. If Roman Road is closed, Main Street itself will be a barrier across the development and there is no realistic chance that people will walk or cycle along a road that will have to take all the HGVs (who are following the recommended route from the M3 to the B3400 ) that cannot come under the Worting Road bridge due to height restrictions, plus all the traffic from Oakley and Overton and other points west. The proposed closure of Roman Road will make drivers use the rat run through Wootton St Lawrence to avoid using Main Street. This will create safety issues, because the Wootton Road has poor visibility, is very winding, and has no lighting. Further issues, that while not the subject of this application are fundamental to the development and must be considered before any building commences. Drainage/Sewage Although this is, according to the application, a reserved matter, it cannot be left until building starts – this is a major infrastructure project and Thames Water have said they can accommodate only the first phase of building into the existing facilities. The issue is not only around treatment of waste, it also involves the pumping of the treated water back into the water system. The low water table at Ivy Down Lane, and indeed all around Deane, means that there is risk of flooding and this will only be exacerbated by the increased volume of water being pumped back into the system. To leave this unresolved will result in a piecemeal, suboptimal solution and it needs to be addressed at the outline stage, not left until later. Pipeline The proposed flyover/under is shown within the restricted area around the pipeline.” Oakley Parish Council (Amended Scheme) Object: “The Planning Committee, with input from other members of the Parish Council, have discussed the most recent proposals for road junctions onto and from the new development. The members OBJECT to the application, for the following reasons: Closure of Roman Road The Parish Council continues to object to the closure of Roman Road: whilst we appreciate that there is a problem with Wellington Terrace, the closure of Roman Road to solve it seems totally disproportionate. The idea of some kind of dog-leg to join up Roman Road traffic with traffic on Main Street will cause major delays and the roundabout or whatever is proposed would have to be large enough for Bakers Recover vehicles with trailers. A better solution could be to give Wellington Terrace access to the roundabout on the A339 directly and close off the existing turn onto the Roman Road. Main Street The plans involve ‘pushing’ all through traffic into the development but there are already going to be so many internal movements that there will be huge delays, including for emergency vehicles accessing the hospital. The developments further along the B3400 at Overton, Whitchurch and Andover will all create extra traffic that will be funnelled into the development and this can only add to the problems. Members suggested that there should be one way into and out of the development from the A339, that does not then not allow through access onto the B3400 ( other than for buses and emergency vehicles). B3400 The documents say that the purpose of the cross roads at the brow of Scrapps Hill is to enable traffic to be limited to 40mph but members are not sure what exactly is planned – is it intended to be traffic light controlled? If so, this will just cause further delays for traffic from the west trying to get into town or to the hospital and will encourage use of the rat run through Wootton St Lawrence to the A339. Multi User path If the re-routing of the B3400 goes ahead there will be disused road that could easily be adapted into a Multiuser path from the development to Oakley, which the Parish Council and HCC have been requesting. If the B3400 is not rerouted there is still a definite need for this path and it must be included in the plans.” Oakley Parish Council (Amended Scheme) Object: “The Planning Committee of the Oakley and Deane Parish Council met last evening and the above application was discussed. The members object to the application: Closing Roman Road is going to add significantly to journey times to and from Oakley and the towns and villages to the west, The predicted traffic flows appear to be vastly underestimated and do not consider the new developments further along to the west of Oakley, The predicted traffic timings are based on free flowing traffic, but this is unrealistic especially with so many turns off main street which will create waiting traffic, There is mention in the documents about the Hampshire Traffic Modelling scheme but no details are provided, The intention should be to direct traffic away from the B3400 but this does not appear to be achieved in the current plans, Any roundabouts/crossroads have to be negotiable by Baker’s recovery vehicles (the Redrow roundabout at Worting Road is the HCC agreed size and layout), There is an implicit assumption that residents will use public transport but the routes have to get them to where they want to go, and when they need to travel. It is likely that many of the residents will commute so they will need to get to the rail station early in the morning. If public transport is not in place from the onset, residents will get into a routine of driving. With the huge cuts in subsidies for travel, what is the guarantee that such routes will remain functional for any given period? There is much emphasis on cycling but realistically this is for leisure and occasional use – very few people cycle to work or to shop. Even if the development itself offers opportunities for safe cycling, main roads around the town do not. Trenchards Lane will become a rat run as more and more vehicles try to avoid the B3400: there are often problems with vehicles speeding, there are very sharp bends, the road is single carriageway with passing spaces and is not able to deal with the traffic as it is, let alone with a significant increase, Where will traffic from the Oakley Park development egress – on to the B3400 ( if so, will this be by roundabout or by a traffic-light controlled junction?) or be put onto the Main Street so that they have to do a tour of the development to get out?” Oakley Parish Council Final Comments Object: “ The members of Oakley & Deane Parish Council’s Planning Committee met on 2nd January to discuss the above application. Members have multiple objections to the application: Roman Road closure: members continue to strongly object to this. This is an ideal opportunity to make Roman Road a dual carriage way. If the issue is Wellington Terrace then there are alternative solutions, including bringing out Wellington Terrace to join the roundabout on the A339. Alternatively there is a precedent to closing such a route to/from a major road, for example at Kempshott Lane. Similarly, along the A340 near the Childrens’ Cemetery, there is a road that was closed off but still exists, which potentially could be reopened to mitigate some of the traffic around Rooksdown. Closing Roman Road will just push all the traffic onto the Main Street, which if it does have a 20mph speed limit, with all the junctions to and from it feeding the other estate roads, will simply push drivers onto minor roads to avoid the resulting holdups. Creating rat runs using country lanes is not the solution. Also, Bakers of Oakley who operate the recovery service from the M3 and other major local routes use this route to get to and from Oakley and any changes to roundabouts etc must accommodate their specific requirements. Prohibition of right turn into Old Kempshott Lane: this will cause significant extra traffic at the roundabout at the end of Worting Road at the junction with the B3400/Buckskin Lane. At a time when green issues are so high on the list of priorities for most residents, to make people drive up to a mile extra to turn right is not justifiable. Public transport: P9 of the Movement Strategy (MS)states that 70% of all journeys will be made by car: if there is no public transport in at the start of the development this will be much nearer 90%. The Transport Assessment Second Addendum (TASA) states ‘ bus priority can be considered as part of the investment package for later phases of the development as part of the monitor and manage approach’. There is no mention of a direct bus to Kingsclere, yet with the amalgamation of Watership Down Health, many residents from Oakley have to travel to Kingsclere to access services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For England Report No. .513
    For England Report No. .513 Parish Review BOROUGH OF BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE LOCAL GOVERNlfERT BOUNDARY COMMISSION ••.••" FOH ENGLAND BEPORT NO.SI3 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMG MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRICS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr T Brockbank DL Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Mr D Scholes OBE THE RIGHT HON. KENNETH BAKER MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT BACKGROUND 1. In a letter dated 20 December 1984 we were informed of your predecessor's decision not to give effect to "our proposals to transfer part of the parish of Monk Sherborne, at Charter Alley, to the parish of Wootton St. Lawrence. He felt that in the light of representations subsequently made to him this element of our proposals warranted further consideration. Accordingly, in exercise of his powers under section 51(3 ) of the Local Government Act 1972 he directed us to undertake a 'further review of the parishes of Monk Sherborne and Wootton St. Lawrence, and to make such revised proposals as we saw fit before 31 December 1985. CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT PROPOSALS 2. In preparing our draft proposals we considered a number of possible alternative approaches to uniting Charter Alley within one parish, bearing in mind the represent- ations made to the Secretary of State. 3. The first was to create a new parish consisting of the northern parts of the existing parishes of Monk Sherborne and Wootton St. Lawrence and bounded in the south by the A339. One difficulty with this approach was that whilst Monk Sherborne Parish Council would have welcomed the idea, Wootton St.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Arches Court of Canterbury
    IN THE ARCHES COURT OF CANTERBURY Charles George QC, Dean of the Arches Chancellor McClean QC and Chancellor Briden On appeal from the Consistory Court of the Diocese of Winchester In re ST LAWRENCE, OAKLEY WITH WOOTTON ST LAWRENCE Judgment (as approved) Appearances: Alexander McGregor of Counsel, for the Appellant/Party Opponent, instructed by Stephen Slack, The Legal Office, Church House, Westminster SW1P 3AZ Peter Smith of Counsel, for the Respondents/Petitioners, instructed by Brutton & Co, Solicitors, West End House, 288 West Street, Fareham PO16 OAJ 1 . INTRODUCTION 1. This case concerns the Wootton St Lawrence Armet (“the armet”). An armet is a type of helmet, worn by knights and men-at-arms during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and characterised by a rounded skull, with an extended tail-piece at the back and hinged cheek-pieces which opened to accept the wearer‟s head and which when locked closed around the face at the chin. This armet is a good example of a rare type, probably of Flemish origin, and dating from about 1500. There are in England only fourteen other surviving continental armets, all of which at some stage were displayed in English churches. No English armour dating from around 1500 and before survives apart from this group. Apart from its historic interest, it is also an article of intrinsic beauty and fine craftsmanship, unusually retaining its later, seventeenth century painted decoration. 2. Church treasures, as such articles are sometimes described, are rightly prized. As was said in Treasures on Earth (a report by a working party of the Council for Places of Worship, 1973, para 2): “[O]ne of the most excellent ambitions of Christians…has been to express their faith in the language of the arts – in architecture, sculpture, painting, mosaic, music and poetry – and thus to build houses of God which are symbols of that faith, thereafter furnishing them with objects as nearly worthy of the worship of God as human skill can make them.
    [Show full text]
  • Burley Denny Lodge Hursley Overton Minstead Binsted Beaulieu Fawley
    Mortimer Newtown West End East Ashford Hill with Headley Stratfield Saye Silchester Bramshill Woodhay Tadley Stratfield TurgisHeckfield Eversley Highclere Pamber Yateley Burghclere Kingsclere Baughurst BramleyHartley Wespall Mattingley Linkenholt Ecchinswell, Sydmonton Blackwater Faccombe Sherfield on Loddon and Hawley Vernhams and Bishops Green Sherborne St. John Hartley Wintney Ashmansworth Monk Sherborne Sherfield Park Rotherwick Dean Elvetham Heath Litchfield and Woodcott Hannington Chineham Wootton St. Lawrence Hook Fleet Hurstbourne Tarrant Rooksdown Newnham Winchfield Old Basing and Lychpit Church Crookham Dogmersfield Crookham Tangley St. Mary Bourne Mapledurwell and Up Nately Oakley Greywell Village Whitchurch Deane Odiham Ewshot Smannell Overton Winslade Appleshaw Enham Alamein Cliddesden Tunworth Penton Grafton Upton Grey Crondall Kimpton Steventon Charlton Hurstbourne Priors Farleigh Wallop Weston Corbett Fyfield Andover Laverstoke North Waltham Long Sutton Penton Mewsey Ellisfield South Warnborough Shipton Bellinger Dummer Herriard Weston Patrick Bentley Thruxton Amport Longparish Nutley Monxton Popham Froyle Upper Clatford Quarley Abbotts Ann Bradley Lasham Bullington Shalden Grateley Goodworth Clatford Preston Candover Wherwell Binsted Barton Stacey Micheldever Bentworth Wonston Candovers Wield Alton Over Wallop Beech Chilbolton Kingsley Longstock Northington Worldham Leckford Chawton Headley Nether Wallop Medstead South Wonston Old Alresford Lindford Stockbridge Crawley Farringdon Grayshott Bighton Little Somborne Kings
    [Show full text]
  • Sherborne St John Neighbourhood Plan 2011-2029
    SHERBORNE ST JOHN NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2011-2029 May 2017 SHERBORNE ST JOHN NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2011-2029 Page Foreword by the Chairman of Sherborne St John Parish Council 2 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 About the neighbourhood plan 5 3.0 Parish profile 13 4.0 Vision and objectives 24 5.0 Statutory planning policies 25 SSJ1 Housing mix (sizes) 25 SSJ2 Rural character 28 SSJ3 Residential development site 32 6.0 Non-statutory community action plan 33 Evidence library 35 Glossary 36 Page 1 SHERBORNE ST JOHN NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2011-2029 Chairman’s foreword Sherborne St John is recorded in the Domesday Book and continues to be a vibrant Parish over 900 years later. Located just to the north of Basingstoke in North Hampshire, it comprises 1200 inhabitants residing predominantly in the village of the same name. In 2013, following active support from Basingstoke & Deane BC, the Parish Council (SSJPC) took the decision to produce a Neighbourhood Plan, in line with the 2011 Localism Act. There is a feeling of external threat to the integrity of Sherborne St John; this initiative by central government provided an opportunity to retake a measure of control for our locality - our Community. The Plan is seen as a natural progression from the Village Design Statement completed in 2004 and relies on and develops many of its conclusions. The SSJ Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, working under the auspices of the Parish Council, has completed an extensive programme of consultation within the local community of Sherborne St John. This underpins the consultation feedback, which forms the central foundation on which this SSJ Neighbourhood Plan is based.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish and Settlement Groupsm
    Q1. Which village, town or part of a town do you consider as your "local area"? East of Basingstoke (generic) Where more than one of the following is mentioned: Old Basing Bramley Chineham Lychpit Mapledurwell Nately Scures Newnham Sherfield on loddon Bramley Chineham Sherfield park Taylor’s farm Lychpit Newnham Old Basing Sherfield on loddon Eastern parishes Mapledurwell Nately Scures Scures hill Up Nately Basingstoke town Basingstoke North East Marnel park Norden Oakridge Popley South View Basingstoke North West Rooksdown Winklebury Basingstoke Central Berg estate Brookvale Cranbourne Down Grange Eastrop Fairfields Kings Furlong Riverdene South Ham Basingstoke West Buckskin Clarke estate Kempshott Manydown Pack Lane Roman road Worting Basingstoke South Black Dam Brighton Hill Viables Basingstoke South West Beggarwood Hatch Warren Oakley and Deane Oakley Harrow Way Deane Newfound Burghclere Highclere Kingsclere Woolton Hill Northern western parishes Ashford Hill and Headley Ashmansworth Ball Hill Bishops Green Burghclere East Woodhay Ecchinswell Headley Hannington Penwood North eastern parishes (exc Bramley/Sherfield on Loddon) Hartley Wespall Stratfield Saye Stratfield Turgis Ellisfield South east parishes (excl. Ellisfield) Axford, Nutley, Preston Candover Bradley Cliddesden Dummer Fairleigh wallop Herriard Nutley Preston Candover Tunworth Upton Grey Weston Patrick Tadley Northern parishes (exc Tadley) Baughurst Silchester Charter Alley Little London Newtown Pamber End Pamber Green Pamber Heath Ramsdell Wolverton common North of Basingstoke Sherborne St John Monk Sherborne Wootton St Lawrence Overton Southern parishes North Waltham Steventon Whitchurch South West parishes Hurstborne Priors Laverstoke St Mary Bourne Stoke Other Other Basingstoke & Deane Andover Burghfield Hook Eversley Fleet Micheldever Newbury Odiham Winchester .
    [Show full text]
  • RELIGIOUS HISTORY Parochial Organisation Early References to the Parochial Organisation for Nately Scures Are Obscure. in the 12
    RELIGIOUS HISTORY Parochial Organisation Early references to the parochial organisation for Nately Scures are obscure. In the 12th century the first identifiable holder of ecclesiastical office in the parish was simply denoted as a cleric.1 From the 14th century Nately Scures is known to have been served by a rector. From the 17th century onwards the rector of Nately Scures was frequently assisted by a curate. Many rectors of Nately Scures combined their living with other ecclesiastical offices. During the 1920s the church’s financial position was becoming increasingly untenable and a possible amalgamation with several neighbouring parishes was mooted. Despite opposition to the proposal, in 1935 Nately Scures lost its independence.2 Although this lasted 21 years, further reorganisations or amalgamations occurred in 1956 and culminated in June 2008 in the formation of the North Downs benefice, with its eight parishes and 12 churches. Glebe and Tithes The size of the glebe is not known but in 1662 the rector, the Revd John Palmer, cultivated 1 ½ a. of wheat and 1 ¼ a. of oats on it.3 In the early 19th century curates of Nately Scures were permitted to reside on the glebe.4 It was probably not the most extravagant of settings as Richard Carleton cited the unfitness of the glebe house as the reason for his non residency in the parish in 18365, 18386 and 1845.7 The reason for this may have been the fact that Nately Scures is a relatively small parish with small population. In 1841 £128 was due to the church in rent from the parish.8 The Religious Census of 1851 recorded that net worth of the tithes was £170 and the glebe was worth £15.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Commission for England A0 CUST POR with the Permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright
    D A O R N O Monk Sherborne Wood IX CALLEVAD WARD E Monk SHERFIELD ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSIONAN FOR ENGLAND L LN Sherborne BRAMLEY CP KI LODDON CP Kiln Green Monk Sherborne A House 3 4 Lower Farm 0 SHERBORNE ST JOHN WARD TAYLORS FARM PARISH WARD D D Queen's A A O O R House R E N Cowdry Fieldgate Y E V House R O Razor's Farm M N A H Collett's Copse PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE Long Swains Row Petty's Copse E CL YM Rookery Weybrook TH Sherfield Hall Farm Farm W F e E y N Br N oo E k Hampshire International L A J Business Park C A D C u X Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in Basingstoke f L N a E C u L T d S e E Thames Dale L T W a H n O Little R July 2000 e NH Baker's IL SAFFRON CL L All Saints' Sherborne St John Kestrel Court Martin's Bushes Copse Church Grub Close Plantation W Manor AY Farm The Grange WAY Crane's D A (Nursing Home) O Farm R M N PE A TT W Y'S B R ROOK E O RD D N L N L Y ' IE V S Marl's Copse E F R C S SHERBORNEBob's ST Farm JOHN CP L RA NE A NE A N B S R E O Chapel R C W D M S A P Cemetery Chute N R R I Recreation Ground O N A Guinea Copse G C D R Church A Chalk Pit OOK P N MAYBR Spier's Copse Four Acre Piece e E t C Russell's ty L S Five Acre Piece 's O Copse B S r E School Y o A R o R k D D D W A E W O Five Acre E E R I 3 R Plantation V 3 T N Upper Parrott's Copse Seven A O E M T D Acre Piece M R S I A L A A R Basing Forest F C K M RA R NE Allot E S Gdns L D Chineham School A L N A R Inner Maynard's Maynard's and MONK SHERBORNE CP O E Business AD Copse Piece Community Centre Allot Park
    [Show full text]
  • Herriard Religious History
    HERRIARD RELIGIOUS HISTORY Herriard was served by a vicar from at least the late 13th century, as the earliest known vicar was recorded in 1284.1 A parson2, a chaplain3 and a former rector of Herriard4 were also recorded in the 13th century. Thereafter Herriard was always served by a vicar, who from the 16th century onwards was often assisted by a curate. In the 18th and 19th centuries the vicars of Herriard were often non-resident and many vicars and curates held other church offices in conjunction with their posts in Herriard. In the 20th and 21st centuries there were a series of amalgamations with neighbouring benefices from the merger with Lasham (St Mary) in 1929,5 to the combination in 2008 into the North Hampshire Downs benefice comprising eight parishes and 12 churches.6 PAROCHIAL ORGANISATION Glebe and Tithes Payments to the church were included as rents in grants during the 13th century. In the 1260s William Buntes was granted a messuage in Herriard for which the rent was one gillyflower and 2s. paid to the church.7 When Henry, son of Henry Faber leased the same messuage from Bunte his rent was one rose to Bunte and 2s. to the church.8 The benefice was assessed at £21 13s. 4d. in 1291, the church valued at £16 13s. 4d. and the vicarage valued at £5.9 In July 1305 the parsonage of the church was valued at £1 13s. 4d. for the purposes of crown dues, a sum that was presumably paid before Michaelmas.10 On 17 March 1334, Thomas de Coudray granted the church, lands, tithes and advowson of Herriard to the nunnery of Hartley Wintney.11 This grant formed the basis of a new manor of Herriard Witney.12 In 1597 the quarterly rent due to the vicar of Herriard was 50s.13 When John Wynne, vicar of Herriard, leased the vicarage to 1 Registrum Johannis de Pontissara, 293.
    [Show full text]
  • Named Paupers, 1835 to 1872
    Basingstoke Union, Pauper names 1835 to 1872 See end for Keys and Sources (Sorted by date) Year Day Name Age Parish Occupation Reason for entry Additional comment Source 1835 11-Jul Carter, John Weston Patrick Lab, turnip hoeing RB 1835 11-Jul Harwood, James Basing Lab. RB 1835 11-Jul Smith, Elizabeth Basing RB 1835 11-Jul Wallis, John Basing Lab, railway RB 1835 11-Jul Wareham, David Basing Lab, railway RB 1835 25-Jul Clarke, Benjamin Herriard Lab, agricultural RB 1835 25-Jul Rice, Mary Basing RB 1835 31-Jul Mansbridge, Charles Basing Lab. RB 1835 1-Aug Morris, William Newnham Lab. RB 1835 3-Aug May, William Basing RB 1835 10-Aug Byde, John Newnham RB 1835 10-Aug Duckett, Martha Newnham RB 1835 10-Aug Hidcoop (?), John Newnham RB 1835 10-Aug Upton, William Mappledurwell RB 1835 21-Aug Aldy, Henry Weston Patrick Carter RB 1835 21-Aug Arnolds, Thomas Weston Patrick Lab. RB 1835 21-Aug Baker, Elizabeth Newnham RB 1835 21-Aug Benwall, Daniel Basing Lab. RB 1835 21-Aug Byde, Mary Newnham Widow RB 1835 21-Aug Hall, John Upton Grey RB 1835 21-Aug Head, Thomas Basing Traveller RB 1835 21-Aug Hidcoop (?), Jane Newnham Widow RB 1835 21-Aug Hopkins, Christopher Newnham RB 1835 21-Aug Masters, Thomas Newnham Lab. RB 1835 21-Aug Piper, James Tunworth Lab. RB 1835 21-Aug White, Robert Basing Lab. RB 1835 4-Sep Baker, Benjamin Herriard Lab. RB 1835 4-Sep Banner, Daniel Herriard Lab. RB 1835 4-Sep Budd, William Newnham RB 1835 4-Sep Buston, Thomas Mappledurwell Lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Area Appraisal
    Conservation Area Appraisal Conservation Area Appraisal Monk Sherborne …makingMonk a difference Sherborne Conservation Area Appraisal Introduction The Monk Sherborne Conservation Area was designated in 1992 by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council in recognition of the special architectural and historic interest of the village. Having designated the Conservation Area, the Local Authority has a statutory duty to ensure that those elements that form its particular character or appearance should be preserved or enhanced, especially when considering planning applications. It is therefore necessary to define, and analyse, those qualities or elements that The War Memorial contribute to, or detract from, the special interest of the area and to assess how they combine to justify its designation as a Conservation Area. Such factors can include: • its historic development; • the contribution of individual or groups of buildings to the streetscene and the spaces that surround them; and • the relationship of the built environment with the landscape. They can also include the less tangible senses and experiences, such as noise or smells, which can play a key part in forming the distinctive character of an area. The Appraisal takes the form of written text and an Appraisal plan. In both respects every effort has been made to include, or analyse, those elements key to the special character of the area. Where buildings, structures or features have not been specifically highlighted it does not necessarily follow that they are of no visual or historic value to the Conservation Area. The document is intended to be an overall framework and guide within which decisions can be made on a site- specific basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Notices of Poll and Situation of Polling Stations
    NOTICE OF POLL Basingstoke & Deane Election of Councillors for Basing & Upton Grey Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of Councillors to be elected is three. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) CUBITT Kolkinnon House, Conservative Party Hugo Cubitt (+) William M Cubitt (++) Onnalee Virginia Blaegrove Lane, Up Candidate Nately, Hook, RG27 9PD GODESEN 71 The Street, Old Conservative Party Trixie J Godesen (+) Catherine B Tuck (++) Sven Howard Basing, Basingstoke, Candidate RG24 7BY KENNAN (Address in Liberal Democrat Mary Kennan (+) Catherine S F Bell (++) James Anthony Basingstoke and Deane) LILLEKER (Address in Liberal Democrat Raymond D Ripton (+) Jane E Ripton (++) Richard Mark Basingstoke and Deane) LOWE (Address in Labour Party Gillian Noble (+) David Noble (++) Beth Basingstoke and Deane) MOYNIHAN (Address in Hampshire Adam C T Lippitt (+) Kathleen M Williams Anna Basingstoke and Independents (++) Deane) RUFFELL (Address in Conservative Party John W Guy (+) James R Whitcombe Mark Beresford Basingstoke and Candidate (++) Deane) 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Station Ranges of electoral register numbers of Situation
    [Show full text]
  • WW1 Centenary Memorial Names Booklet
    1914 t o 2014 2014 18 FIRST WORLD WAR CENTENARY WE WILL REMEMBER THEM “Commemorating those named on war memorials in Basingstoke” and Deane www.basingstoke.gov.uk/go/WW1 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 Basingstoke War Memorial ................................................................... 2 Basingstoke - St Michael’s Church ....................................................... 6 Ashmansworth .......................................................................................... 9 Baughurst - Heath End ............................................................................ 9 Baughurst .................................................................................................... 9 Bramley ....................................................................................................... 10 Burghclere .................................................................................................. 10 St Mary’s Churchyard, Goat Lane, Eastrop ..................................... 11 Dummer ..................................................................................................... 11 East Woodhay - East End ...................................................................... 11 East Woodhay - Woolton Hill .............................................................. 12 Ecchinswell, Sydmonton and Bishops Green ...................................... 12 Ellisfield ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]