DOCSLIB.ORG

Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Document 15th June 2017 Document Details Reference Description Document Title Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Document Document Ref 70818 019 Issue Issue 1 Date 15 June 2017 Client Name Leeds Bradford Airport Classification Issue Amendment Date Issue 1 Initial Issue June 2017 Approval Level Authority Name Author Osprey CSL Reviewer Leeds Bradford Airport Alan Siddoway Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal | Document Details ii 70818 019 | Issue 1 Table of Contents 1 Foreword by the Chief Executive Officer ......................................................................... 1 2 What is this Consultation About? .................................................................................... 2 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Departure Procedures .......................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Arrival Procedures ................................................................................................................ 2 2.4 Approach Procedures .......................................................................................................... 2 2.5 Airspace ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.6 What is Not Within this Consultation? .................................................................................. 3 2.7 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 3 Why Consult? ..................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Consultation Requirements .................................................................................................. 4 3.3 Consultation Process Concerns ........................................................................................... 5 4 Who is Being Consulted and How Do I Participate? ...................................................... 6 4.1 Who is Being Consulted? ..................................................................................................... 6 4.2 How do I Submit my Response? .......................................................................................... 6 4.3 What Should I Include in my Response? ............................................................................. 7 4.4 What Will Happen to my Response? ................................................................................... 7 4.5 How will I know the Result of the Consultation? .................................................................. 7 4.6 Deadline for Responses ....................................................................................................... 7 5 Why Change? ..................................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 8 5.2 Drivers for Change ............................................................................................................... 8 6 Options Considered ......................................................................................................... 10 6.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 10 6.2 Option 0. Do Nothing ......................................................................................................... 10 6.3 Option 1. Do Minimal ......................................................................................................... 10 6.4 Option 2. Other Airspace Constructs ................................................................................ 11 6.5 Option 3. Initial Concept .................................................................................................... 11 6.6 Option 4. Simplified and Consolidated Arrival and Departure Procedures ....................... 11 6.7 Option 5. Replication of Current Departures and Rationalisation of Airspace Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 12 7 The Proposal .................................................................................................................... 16 7.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 16 7.2 Key Influences on the Design ............................................................................................ 16 7.3 Departure Procedures ........................................................................................................ 16 7.4 Arrival Procedures .............................................................................................................. 17 7.5 Airspace ............................................................................................................................. 23 Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal | Table of Contents iii 70818 019 | Issue 1 8 NATS Link Routes ............................................................................................................ 27 8.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 27 8.2 Departures ......................................................................................................................... 27 8.3 Arrivals ............................................................................................................................... 29 9 How Could the Change Affect Me? ................................................................................ 30 9.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 30 9.2 Effects That May be Experienced by Local Residents ....................................................... 30 9.3 Effects on Other Airspace Users ........................................................................................ 35 10 What Happens Next? ....................................................................................................... 38 10.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 38 10.2 CAA Actions ....................................................................................................................... 38 11 References ........................................................................................................................ 39 A1 Stakeholders ..................................................................................................................... 40 A1.1 Aviation Consultees ............................................................................................................ 40 A1.2 Non-Aviation Consultees .................................................................................................... 42 A1.3 Information Organisations .................................................................................................. 47 A2 Reportable Safety Events ................................................................................................ 49 A3 Initial Conceptual Designs .............................................................................................. 57 A4 Interim Designs ................................................................................................................ 59 A5 Proposed Procedure Models .......................................................................................... 61 A6 Airspace Co-ordinates ..................................................................................................... 63 A6.1 CTR 1 ................................................................................................................................. 63 A6.2 CTR 2 ................................................................................................................................. 63 A6.3 CTR 3 ................................................................................................................................. 63 A6.4 CTA 1 ................................................................................................................................. 64 A6.5 CTA 2 ................................................................................................................................. 64 A6.6 CTA 3 ................................................................................................................................. 64 A6.7 CTA 4 ................................................................................................................................. 65 A6.8 CTA 5 ................................................................................................................................. 65 A6.9 CTA 6 ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNISON Active Magazine – Summer 2020
    SUMMER 2020 UNISON ACTIVE! 1 ACTIVE!MAGAZINE FOR MEMBERS IN YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE SUMMER 2020 | ISSUE 33 | £3 WWW.UNISON-YORKS.ORG.UK THE FUTURE STARTS HERE P20 UNISON’s impressive new Leeds HQ P3,5,6&10 CORONAVIRUS: YOUR UNION IS WITH YOU All the pictures in this issue were taken before strict rules on social isolation were introduced because of the coronavirus pandemic. The emergency also means that this edition of Active! is digital only. 2 UNISON ACTIVE! SUMMER 2020 COVID-19 Your rights at work & more... The situation is changing quickly - so visit the UNISON Yorkshire & Humberside website for links to the latest guidance As is the case across the country, UNISON branches in our region are advising, supporting and representing members as the nation adjusts to the challenge of COVID-19. These are diffi cult times for everyone, and our members are amongst those on the frontline, doing the critical work they always do in unprecedented circumstances. UNISON is here to help you and your families. Members needing advice relating to the impact of COVID-19 on their employment may fi nd the Y&H regional website useful in answering basic queries. www.unison-yorks.org.uk Links include... • UNISON – Coronavirus: Your rights at work • Public Health England guidance • Local Government Association guidance • NHS Staff Council guidance • ACAS guidance for employers and employees • UNISON: school closures guidance • There for You: Financial help for UNISON members Get in touch Email: [email protected] Tel: 0113 218 2627 SUMMER 2020 UNISON ACTIVE! 3 OUR UNION SO INCREDIBLY PROUD GENERAL SECRETARY Dave Prentis t is hard to continue to fi nd this national emergency, REGIONAL SECRETARY the words to express what or practically supporting John Cafferty Ian extraordinary time this members like you on the REGIONAL CONVENOR is.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachel Reeves MP
    Rachel Reeves MP Monthly Report September 2014 Labour Member of Parliament for Leeds West, Shadow Secretary of State for Work & Pensions SUPPORT OUR LEEDS WEST LIBRARIES Constituency, following a number of 1000 signatures. closures in the past few years, and Leeds West now has the lowest Rachel has also hosted a public number of libraries in Leeds. For meetings at Bramley and Armley comparison, Elmet and Rothwell Library and a ‘read in’ event at Constituency has 7 Libraries. Bramley Library. A further read-in will be taking place at Armley Library on As part of the campaign, Rachel has Saturday 20th September from visited schools across Leeds West and 10am. There will be storytellers and Full crowd at Bramley Library chatted with pupils and teachers fun activities for kids. Public Meeting about their love of libraries. Armley writers, Alan Bennett and Barbara Rachel is spearheading a campaign Taylor-Bradford have sent messages against the proposed reduction of of support to the campaign, with Alan opening hours at Armley and Bennett writing, “...Every child in Bramley Libraries. Leeds today deserves these facilities and the support that I had Armley and Bramley are the only fifty years ago”. A petition against the libraries left in the Leeds West proposed cuts has received almost BRAMLEY VETERAN SECURES MEDAL Bramley war veteran Peter Paylor, Defence and was able to secure Mr age 91, has finally received his Paylor his medal after a 66 year wait. campaign medal for service in Palestine between 1945—1948, Rachel, who first met Mr Paylor at following intervention from Rachel the Bramley War Memorial and Bramley & Stanningley Councillor dedication ceremony, said, “After Kevin Ritchie.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Nursery Infant/Primary Junior
    STREET NURSERY INFANT/PRIMARY JUNIOR SECONDARY ABBEY DRIVE Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy Academy Academy ABBEY GARDENS Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy Academy Academy ABBEY GREEN Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy Academy Academy ABBEY GROVE Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy Academy Academy ABBEY ROAD Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy Academy Academy ABBEY WALK Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy Academy Academy ABBEY WALK Scawsby Saltersgate Infant Scawsby Saltersgate Infant Scawsby Ridgewood School School School Saltersgate Junior School ABBEY WALK Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy CARAVAN SITE Academy Academy ABBEY WAY Crookesbroom Primary Crookesbroom Primary Ash Hill Academy Academy Academy ABBEYFIELD St Oswald's C of E St Oswald's C of E The Hayfield School Academy Academy ABBEYFIELD ROAD Hatfield Sheep Dip Lane Hatfield Sheep Dip Lane Ash Hill Academy Primary School Primary School ABBOTT STREET Hexthorpe Primary School Hexthorpe Primary School Balby Carr Community Academy ABERCONWAY Rossington Tornedale Rossington Tornedale Infant Pheasant Rossington All Saints CRESCENT Infant School School Bank Academy Academy ABERCORN ROAD Plover Primary School Plover Primary School Danum Academy ABINGDON ROAD Sandringham Primary Sandringham Primary Danum Academy School School ACACIA COURT Bentley New Village Bentley New Village Primary Don Valley Academy Primary School
    [Show full text]
  • ACCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: ) Sche Be
    AAIB Bulletin: 1/2008 HGM and GDP EW/C2006/10/02 ACCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: ) Schebe SF27 glder, HGM 2) Schlecher ASW 9 glder, GDP No & Type of Engines: ) None 2) None Year of Manufacture: ) 1965 2) 1979 Date & Time (UTC): 2 October 2006 at 55 hrs Location: Sutton Bank, North Yorkshre Type of Flight: ) Prvate 2) Prvate Persons on Board: ) Crew - Passengers - None 2) Crew - Passengers - None Injuries: ) Crew - (Mnor) Passengers - N/A 2) Crew - (Fatal) Passengers - N/A Nature of Damage: ) Arcraft destroyed 2) Arcraft destroyed Commander’s Licence: 1) British Gliding Association (BGA) Gliding Certificate 2) British Gliding Association (BGA) Gliding Certificate Commander’s Age: ) 50 years 2) 48 years Commander’s Flying Experience: ) 733 hours Last 90 days - 20 hours Last 28 days - 5 hours 2) 280 hours Last 90 days - 0 hours Last 28 days - hour Information Source: AAIB Feld Investgaton wth assstance from the Brtsh Gldng Assocaton (BGA) Synopsis Two glders, a Schebe SF27 and a Schlecher ASW 9B, able to escape from hs arcraft and parachute to the were flying close to Sutton Bank, North Yorkshire, when ground: the plot of the ASW 9 was not able to release they were n collson close to a bank of cloud. Both hs cockpt canopy and was klled. The engneerng glders lost portons of wng n the mpact and were nvestgaton ndcated that both arcraft were servceable rendered incapable of flight. The pilot of the SF27 was untl the moment of collson. © Crown copyrght 2008 90 AAIB Bulletin: 1/2008 HGM and GDP EW/C2006/10/02 Two Safety Recommendatons were made shortly after 920 ft amsl and ts geographcal stuaton provdes the the event and a further two are made n ths report.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2011 / Yorkshire and the Humber
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2011 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 7 Publications and guidance 10 THE REGISTER 12 Content and assessment criteria 12 Key to the entries 15 Yorkshire and the Humber heritage assets at risk 17 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 18 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 40 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 41 North Lincolnshire (UA) 42 North Yorkshire 45 South Yorkshire 100 West Yorkshire 113 York (UA) 131 AW_YH_Regional_Sep26_Layout 1 03/10/2011 14:27 Page 1 PRIORITY SITES COVER IMAGE: Keld Heads lead smeltmill • Barden Church, Barden, Yorkshire Dales National Park and mine complex, Wensley, Richmondshire, Scheduled • Battle of Towton, Lead / Saxton with Scarthingwell / Towton, Selby, North Yorkshire Monument at Risk and • Birdsall Estate (incl.16 scheduled monuments at risk), Birdsall Wold, Ryedale, North Yorkshire Priority Site • First Leeds White Cloth Hall, 98-101 (consec) Kirkgate, Leeds, West Yorkshire • Haworth Conservation Area, Bradford, West Yorkshire • Keld Heads lead smeltmill and mine complex, Wensley, Richmondshire, North Yorkshire • Kirklees Park Farm buildings (incl. Double aisled barn to north west of Kirklees Priory Gatehouse, Home Farm (Building No. 6), Kirklees Priory Gatehouse, L-shaped Aisled Barn, and the Malthouse) Brighouse, Calderdale , West Yorkshire • Leah’s Yard, 20-22 Cambridge Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire • Grassington Moor (multi-period lead mines and processing works and 20th century barytes mill), Grassington, Yorkshire Dales National Park • Whortlon Castle (gatehouse and ruins of undercroft), Castle Bank, Whorlton, North York Moors National Park CONTACT: Susan Daniels, Business Manager, English Heritage, Yorkshire and the Humber, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP.
    [Show full text]
  • West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority
    WEST YORKSHIRE FIRE AND RESCUE AUTHORITY MEETING TO BE HELD ON FRIDAY 16 DECEMBER 2011 AT 10.30 A.M. IN THE TRAINING AND CONFERENCE SUITE, BIRKENSHAW AGENDA 1. CHAIRMAN’S ANNOUNCEMENTS 2. ADMISSION OF THE PUBLIC The Committee is asked to consider whether, by resolution, to exclude the public from the meeting during the items of business marked with an ‘E’ reference, because of the possibility of the disclosure of exempt information. 3. URGENT ITEMS To determine whether there are any additional items of business which, by reason of special circumstances, the Chair believes should be considered at the meeting. 4. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To consider any Declaration of Interest in relation to any item of business on the agenda. 5. MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING HELD ON 9 SEPTEMBER 2011 (pp 3 - 8) (Enclosed) 6. MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 30 SEPTEMBER 2011 (pp 9 - 11) (Enclosed) 7. MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 31 OCTOBER 2011 (pp 12 - 14) (Enclosed) 8. MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY SAFETY COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 4 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 15 - 21) (Enclosed) 9. MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 11 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 22 - 24) (Enclosed) 10. MINUTES OF THE FINANCE AND RESOURCES COMMITTEE AT A MEETING HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2011 (pp 25 - 28) (Enclosed) 11. LOCAL GOVERNMENT GROUP MINUTES (pp 29 - 51) a) Fire Commission - 14 October 2011 (p 29) b) Safer and Stronger Communities Programme Board - 13 September 2011 (p 36) c) Fire Services Management Committee - 16 September 2011 (p 45) - 17 November 2011 (Enclosed where available) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Frank Cooper on Air Force Policy in the 1950S & 1960S
    The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society Copyright © Royal Air Force Historical Society, 1993 All rights reserved. 1 Copyright © 1993 by Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 1993 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Printed by Hastings Printing Company Limited Royal Air Force Historical Society 2 THE PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY Issue No 11 President: Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Committee Chairman: Air Marshal Sir Frederick B Sowrey KCB CBE AFC General Secretary: Group Captain J C Ainsworth CEng MRAeS Membership Secretary: Commander P O Montgomery VRD RNR Treasurer: D Goch Esq FCCA Programme Air Vice-Marshal G P Black CB OBE AFC Sub-Committee: Air Vice-Marshal F D G Clark CBE BA Air Commodore J G Greenhill FBIM T C G James CMG MA *Group Captain I Madelin Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA Group Captain A R Thompson MBE MPhil BA FBIM MIPM Members: A S Bennell Esq MA BLitt *Dr M A Fopp MA PhD FMA FBIM A E Richardson *Group Captain N E Taylor BSc D H Wood Comp RAeS * Ex-officio The General Secretary Regrettably our General Secretary of five years standing, Mr B R Jutsum, has found it necessary to resign from the post and the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic UN Vote to Ban Nuclear Weapons
    Yorkshire CND Issue 90 Action for Peace Winter 2016/7 he Yorkshire CND Newsletter Historic UN Vote to Ban Nuclear Weapons It was relatively easy to miss in the UK press, the The main body of opposition to the proposal came from exciting news that on 27 October, the UN General Russia, NATO states, and those heavily inluenced by Assembly's Disarmament and Security Committee voted NATO states. While India and Pakistan abstained, North for negotiations in 2017 on a treaty to prohibit nuclear Korea voted for the ban treaty negotiations, highlighting weapons. This clearly has momentous consequences very clearly, the countries that pose the greatest nuclear for Trident renewal, and ofers the best hope for threat to the world! disarmament campaigners for many years. The following analysis from an article by Rebecca 123 UN Member states (a huge majority) voted to Johnson of ICANuk underlines the importance of this convene a multilateral UN conference in 2017 "to vote. negotiate a legally binding treaty to prohibit nuclear ‘Building on the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), weapons, leading towards their total elimination". the new multilateral treaty will for the irst time provide a comprehensive approach to prohibiting activities such as the use, deployment, production, transporting, stockpiling and inancing of nuclear weapons. It will also extend the NPT's nuclear disarmament obligation by creating a clear, unequivocal legal obligation to eliminate existing arsenals that will apply to non-NPT as well as all NPT states. If the UN First Committee vote is conirmed by the UN General Assembly in December, as is likely, the negotiations will go ahead, with sessions timetabled for March, June and July 2017 in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds East Airport
    Leeds East Airport AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL IN SUPPORT OF A GNSS BASED APPROACH Introduction Leeds East Airport (LEA) is seeking to introduce a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) based approach to two of its runways. These changes are compatible with CAA policies regarding Performance Based Navigation (PBN) the design of Instrument Flight Procedures and the management of the airspace surrounding LEA. As we are proposing a change to the way that the airspace around us is currently used we have to follow a laid down procedure as mandated by the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority It is also to support the development of the airport into a Business and Executive Aviation hub for North Yorkshire as we continue to transition the airport from military to civil operation. What this is not about… So, this consultation is not about: • The future growth of Leeds East Airport • Restricting the use of airspace for other users by the establishment of more controlled airspace • Increasing the number of flights into Leeds East • Turning Leeds East into a new Leeds Bradford or Doncaster Sheffield type of airport. Update on progress We originally consulted stakeholders about this proposal in 2017 following which we made changes to the original design. Because of this we have decided to repeat the consultation in-order to update stakeholders regarding those changes. How you can express your views You can respond to the consultation by email or by traditional post. To respond by email :- The dedicated email address for responses is [email protected] or follow the links from www.leedseastairport.co.uk and the ‘Pilot Information’ drop down menu.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 153 December 2016 Web Edition
    No. 153 December 2016 Web Edition Airfield Research Group Ltd Registered in England and Wales | Company Registration Number: 08931493 | Registered Charity Number: 1157924 Registered Office: 6 Renhold Road, Wilden, Bedford, MK44 2QA To advance the education of the general public by carrying out research into, and maintaining records of, military and civilian airfields and related infrastructure, both current and historic, anywhere in the world All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the author and copyright holder. Any information subsequently used must credit both the author and Airfield Review / ARG Ltd. T HE ARG MA N ag E M EN T TE am Directors Chairman Paul Francis [email protected] 07972 474368 Finance Director Norman Brice [email protected] Director Peter Howarth [email protected] 01234 771452 Director Noel Ryan [email protected] Company Secretary Peter Howarth [email protected] 01234 771452 Officers Membership Secretary & Roadshow Coordinator Jayne Wright [email protected] 0114 283 8049 Archive & Collections Manager Paul Bellamy [email protected] Visits Manager Laurie Kennard [email protected] 07970 160946 Health & Safety Officer Jeff Hawley [email protected] Media and PR Jeff Hawley [email protected] Airfield Review Editor Graham Crisp [email protected] 07970 745571 Roundup & Memorials Coordinator Peter Kirk [email protected] C ON T EN T S I NFO rmati ON A ND RE G UL ar S F E at U R ES Information and Notices .................................................1 AW Hawksley Ltd and the Factory at Brockworth .....
    [Show full text]
  • Statues Review Report Appendix 1A 091020 , Item 63. PDF 567 KB
    Appendix 1 – Statue Review Report and Recommendations Statues Review Report and Recommendations Written by Alison Lowe Introduction On 10th June 2020, Cllr Judith Blake issued a statement on Black Lives Matter and statues, which strongly condemned the killing of George Floyd whilst also acknowledging the scourge of racism which still exists across the world; leading to injustice, discrimination and harm to the diverse communities of Leeds. In the same statement, referring to the recent toppling of Edward Colston’s statue in Bristol, Cllr Blake said “We also understand the anguish caused by statues of some historical figures. There will therefore be a city wide review of statues in Leeds to understand their history and context, as well as to ensure our city’s rich multi-cultural history is appropriately celebrated and represented and also to identify any gaps that exist. It is important the review works closely with communities and cultural partners from across the city. We are delighted to announce that Alderwoman Alison Lowe has agreed to lead the review and her vast experience in this area is very much welcome”. The day before on 9th June, the statue of Queen Victoria on Woodhouse Moor was vandalised with graffiti and the words “educate”, “colonise” and “slave owner” were sprayed over the statue. A petition to remove Sir Robert Peel from Woodhouse Moor, also began to circulate. The Local Government Association announced a review of statues and developed an advice note for Labour-led authorities, which recommended “community dialogue” as the best way to hear all sides of the debate with an objective group of people – preferably academics and historians – to undertake the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Vindication, Virtue, and Vitriol
    Journal of Computational Social Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00090-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Vindication, virtue, and vitriol A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 pandemic Tracie Farrell1 · Genevieve Gorrell1 · Kalina Bontcheva1 Received: 21 July 2020 / Accepted: 11 October 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract COVID-19 has given rise to a lot of malicious content online, including hate speech, online abuse, and misinformation. British MPs have also received abuse and hate on social media during this time. To understand and contextualise the level of abuse MPs receive, we consider how ministers use social media to communicate about the pandemic, and the citizen engagement that this generates. The focus of the paper is on a large-scale, mixed-methods study of abusive and antagonistic responses to UK politicians on Twitter, during the pandemic from early February to late May 2020. We fnd that pressing subjects such as fnancial concerns attract high levels of engagement, but not necessarily abusive dialogue. Rather, criticising authorities appears to attract higher levels of abuse during this period of the pandemic. In addi- tion, communicating about subjects like racism and inequality may result in accusa- tions of virtue signalling or pandering by some users. This work contributes to the wider understanding of abusive language online, in particular that which is directed at public ofcials. Keywords Online hate · Abusive speech · Natural language processing · Politics · COVID-19 · Twitter * Tracie Farrell [email protected] Genevieve Gorrell [email protected] Kalina Bontcheva [email protected] 1 University of Shefeld, Shefeld, UK Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Journal of Computational Social Science Introduction Social media can ofer a “temperature check” on which topics and issues are trend- ing for certain cross-sections of the public, and how they feel about them [21].
    [Show full text]