DOCSLIB.ORG

Architecture Program Report 2015 NAAB Visit for Continuing Accreditation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Architecture Program Report 2015 NAAB Visit for Continuing Accreditation University at Buffalo, State University of New York Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Planning Architecture Program Report 2015 NAAB Visit for Continuing Accreditation M.Arch Track I (preprofessional degree plus 64 graduate credit hours) Track II (undergraduate degree plus 112 graduate credit hours) Year of the Previous Visit: 2012 Current Term of Accreditation: Three-year term of accreditation Submitted to: The National Architectural Accrediting Board Date: Sept 10, 2014 University at Buffalo Architecture Program Report September 2014 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Program Administrator: Omar Khan (Chair) Chief administrator for the academic unit in which the program is located: Robert G. Shibley (Dean) Chief Academic Officer of the Institution: Charles F. Zukoski (Provost) President of the Institution: Satish K. Tripathi Individual submitting the Architecture Program Report: Omar Khan Name of individual to whom questions should be directed: Omar Khan 1 University at Buffalo Architecture Program Report September 2014 ____________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Part One. Institutional Support and Commitment to Continuous Improvement 1. Identity and Self-Assessment ..................................................................................... 6 1. History and Mission ................................................................................................. 6 A. University at Buffalo- History and Mission ................................................. 6 B. SAP & Department of Architecture- History and Mission .......................... 9 C. Institutional Synergies and Benefits .......................................................... 10 D. Department of Architecture Program ......................................................... 10 2. Learning Culture and Social Equity......................................................................... 12 3. Response to the Five Perspectives ........................................................................ 14 A. Architectural Education and the Academic Context .................................. 14 B. Architectural Education and the Students ................................................. 15 C. Architectural Education and Registration .................................................. 18 D. Architectural Education and the Profession .............................................. 19 E. Architectural Education and the Public Good ............................................ 20 4. Long Range Planning ............................................................................................. 21 A. Enrollment .................................................................................................. 24 B. Facilities ..................................................................................................... 24 C. Faculty ....................................................................................................... 24 D. Curriculum ................................................................................................. 25 E. Student Empowerment .............................................................................. 25 F. External Communication ............................................................................ 26 5. Program Self Assessment ....................................................................................... 26 A. Online Student Curriculum Self-Assessment Surveys .............................. 26 2. Resources ................................................................................................................... 27 1. Human Resources & Human Resource Development ........................................... 27 A. Students ..................................................................................................... 27 B.Student Development ................................................................................. 29 C. Faculty ....................................................................................................... 30 D. Faculty Development ................................................................................. 32 E. Administration ............................................................................................ 33 F. Staff ............................................................................................................ 33 G. Events and Exhibitions .............................................................................. 33 H. Lecturers and Critics ................................................................................. 37 2. Administrative Structure & Governance .................................................................. 40 3. Physical Resources................................................................................................. 40 A. Physical Plant Summary ............................................................................ 40 B. Hayes Annexes .......................................................................................... 41 C. Diefendorf Hall ........................................................................................... 46 D. Crosby Hall ................................................................................................ 47 E. Parker Hall ................................................................................................. 52 F. Health Sciences Library (HSL) Architecture and Planning Library ............ 54 2 University at Buffalo Architecture Program Report September 2014 ____________________________________________________________________________________ 4. Financial Resources ............................................................................................... 56 A. Financial Base ........................................................................................... 56 B. Endowments and Scholarship ................................................................... 57 5. Information Resources ............................................................................................ 58 A. Library Collection ....................................................................................... 58 B. Library Services ......................................................................................... 61 C. Library Staff ............................................................................................... 62 D. Library Facilities ........................................................................................ 63 E. Library Expenditures .................................................................................. 64 3. Institutional Characteristics ........................................................................................ 65 1. Statistical Reports ................................................................................................... 65 2. Annual Reports ....................................................................................................... 67 3. Faculty Credentials ................................................................................................. 68 4. Policy Review .............................................................................................................. 68 Part Two. Educational Outcomes and Curriculum 1. Student Performance Criteria ..................................................................................... 69 1. Overview of Program’s Curricular Goals ................................................................. 69 2. Graphic Matrixes ..................................................................................................... 71 2. Curricular Framework.................................................................................................. 74 1. Regional Accreditation ............................................................................................ 74 2. Professional Degrees and Curriculum .................................................................... 74 A. Bachelor of Science in Architecture Degree (B.S.).................................... 74 B. Master of Architecture Degree (M.Arch): 3.5-year program ...................... 77 C. Master of Architecture Degree (M.Arch): 2-year program ......................... 78 D. Areas of Concentration (Graduate Research Groups) .............................. 81 E. Minor in Architecture .................................................................................. 81 F. Distribution of General, Professional, and Elective Coursework ............... 82 3. Curriculum Review and Development..................................................................... 82 3. Evaluation of Preparatory/Pre-Professional Education ............................................... 83 1. Bachelor of Science in Architecture Degree (B.S.) ................................................. 83 2. Master of Architecture Degree (M.Arch): 3.5-year program ................................... 84 3. Master of Architecture Degree (M.Arch): 2-year program ...................................... 84 4. Public Information ....................................................................................................... 85 1. Statement on NAAB-Accredited Degrees ............................................................... 85 2. Access to NAAB Conditions and Procedures ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 50 City Stories Explored 5 0 City Sto Rie S Exp Lo
    50 city stories explored 50 city stories explored city stories “The urbanisation challenge is big, it is real and it is with us now. Future generations will live with how we handle it. At Arup, we have joined the challenge – with interventions large and small – to deliver better cities in our ongoing mission to shape a better world.” Gregory Hodkinson Arup Group Chairman Arup Design Book www.arup.com 50 city stories explored Foreword Gregory Hodkinson The urbanisation challenge is big, it is real and it is with us now. Between 1950 and 2050, the global population is likely to quadruple, from 2.5bn to nearly 10bn. Not so long ago, many commentators believed that such a number would be unsupportable. Yet the inexorable growth continues. The urban population is growing at an even faster rate. In the next 35 years, the number of city dwellers will increase from 4bn today to over 6.5bn. Africa and Asia will accommodate 90% of this growth. The rate, scale and concentration of urbanisation in this century is, of course, unprecedented. To accommodate it, the resources of cities, nations, international institutions, civil society and the private sector are being stretched. If our cities are to be efficient, liveable, resilient and sustainable, the relatively long life-cycle of urban development means we can ill afford to get it wrong. It is a challenge that cities around the world must confront, regardless of their size, wealth or location. Future generations will live with how we handle it. At Arup, we have joined this challenge – with interventions large and small – to deliver better cities in our ongoing mission to shape a better world.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2016 Newsletter
    Fall 2016 CHI College Dean’s welcome CHI Theatre & Music 2016/17 theatre season LA Art & Art History Marientina Gotsis and the art of solving problems CHI, DXB, Architecture JED Adrian SmithCHI comes to Projecting the Forum CHI College Projecting the future: a UIC legacy the future: a DET Design Industrial Design at IDSA conference UIC legacy LIS, VCE Architecture City views: School of Architecture represented in Lisbon and Venice CHI College In memoriam CHI Architecture Legos Brick by Brick at the Museum of Science and Industry DET Industrial CHI Design High in the Modern Wing: Amir Berbic’s installation at the Art Institute of Chicago Design at IDSA CHI College Alumni step out at Steppenwolf NYC Design conference The future, now ACC Art & Art History Congratulations, Daniel Dunson CHI College Sides to our story: east side/ west side collaborationsLIS School of University of Illinois at Chicago College of Architecture, Design, and the Arts Architecture to Lisbon and Venice CHI East side/ west side collaborations Dean’s UIC College of Architecture, Design, and the Arts 2 Fall 2016 has arrived at the University of an arts center for UIC and the city of Geissler, Beate, Oliver Sann, and Brian Illinois at Chicago College of Architecture, Chicago. You can also read descriptions and Recent faculty publications Holmes. Volatile Smile. Nuremberg: Moderne welcomeDesign, and the Arts (CADA), and the see images of luminous design concepts Kunst Nurnberg, 2014. learning environment here is as vibrant as for a new visual and performing arts facility The faculty of UIC's College of Harmansah, Omur.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Heatherwick, Architecture's Showman
    Thomas Heatherwick, Architecture’s Showman His giant new structure aims to be an Eiffel Tower for New York. Is it genius or folly? February 26, 2018 | By IAN PARKER Stephen Ross, the seventy-seven-year-old billionaire property developer and the owner of the Miami Dolphins, has a winningly informal, old-school conversational style. On a recent morning in Manhattan, he spoke of the moment, several years ago, when he decided that the plaza of one of his projects, Hudson Yards—a Doha-like cluster of towers on Manhattan’s West Side—needed a magnificent object at its center. He recalled telling him- self, “It has to be big. It has to be monumental.” He went on, “Then I said, ‘O.K. Who are the great sculptors?’ ” (Ross pronounced the word “sculptures.”) Before long, he met with Thomas Heatherwick, the acclaimed British designer of ingenious, if sometimes unworkable, things. Ross told me that there was a presentation, and that he was very impressed by Heatherwick’s “what do you call it—Television? Internet?” An adviser softly said, “PowerPoint?” Ross was in a meeting room at the Time Warner Center, which his company, Related, built and partly owns, and where he lives and works. We had a view of Columbus Circle and Central Park. The room was filled with models of Hudson Yards, which is a mile and a half southwest, between Thirtieth and Thirty-third Streets, and between Tenth Avenue and the West Side Highway. There, Related and its partner, Oxford Properties Group, are partway through erecting the complex, which includes residential space, office space, and a mall—with such stores as Neiman Marcus, Cartier, and Urban Decay, and a Thomas Keller restaurant designed to evoke “Mad Men”—most of it on a platform built over active rail lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Research Quarterly Volume 2, Issue 3
    Design Research Society DRS Digital Library Design Research Quarterly DRS Archive 1-7-2007 Design Research Quarterly Volume 2, Issue 3 Peter Storkerson Follow this and additional works at: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/design-research-quarterly Recommended Citation Storkerson, Peter, "Design Research Quarterly Volume 2, Issue 3" (2007). Design Research Quarterly. 4. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/design-research-quarterly/4 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the DRS Archive at DRS Digital Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Design Research Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DRS Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. V.2:3 July 2007 www.designresearchsociety.org Design Research Society ISSN 1752-8445 Designing the Interface Between Research, Learning and Teaching Linda drew University of the Arts, London Abstract Introduction Table of Contents: This paper’s central argument is that ‘Universities need to set as a mission teaching and research need to be re- goal the improvement of the nexus Articles: shaped so that they connect in a pro- between research and teaching.... The 1 Designing the Interface Between ductive way. This will require actions aim is to increase the circumstanc- Research, Learning and Teaching at a whole range of levels, from the es in which teaching and research Linda Drew individual teacher to the national have occasion to meet, and to provide system and include the international rewards not only for better teaching or 4 DRS 2008 Conference: communities of design scholars. To do for better research but also for demon- Undisciplined! this, we need to start at the level of the strations of the integration between individual teacher and course team.
    [Show full text]
  • Neri Oxman Material Ecology
    ANTONELLI THE NERI OXMAN CALLS HER DESIGN APPROACH MATERIAL ECOLOGY— A PROCESS THAT DRAWS ON THE STRUCTURAL, SYSTEMIC, AND AESTHETIC WISDOM OF NATURE, DISTILLED AND DEPLOYED THROUGH COMPUTATION AND DIGITAL FABRICATION. THROUGHOUT HER TWENTY- ECOLOGY MATERIAL NERI OXMAN NERI OXMAN YEAR CAREER, SHE HAS BEEN A PIONEER OF NEW MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES, AND A CATALYST FOR DYNAMIC INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONS. WITH THE MEDIATED MATTER MATERIAL GROUP, HER RESEARCH TEAM AT THE MIT MEDIA LAB, OXMAN HAS PURSUED RIGOROUS AND DARING EXPERIMENTATION THAT IS GROUNDED IN SCIENCE, PROPELLED BY VISIONARY THINKING, AND DISTINGUISHED BY FORMAL ELEGANCE. ECOLOGY PUBLISHED TO ACCOMPANY A MONOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION OF OXMAN’S WORK AT THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK, NERI OXMAN: MATERIAL ECOLOGY FEATURES ESSAYS BY PAOLA ANTONELLI AND CATALOGUE HADAS A. STEINER. ITS DESIGN, BY IRMA BOOM, PAYS HOMAGE TO STEWART BRAND’S LEGENDARY WHOLE EARTH CATALOG, WHICH CELEBRATED AND PROVIDED RESOURCES FOR A NEW ERA OF AWARENESS IN THE LATE 1960S. THIS VOLUME, IN TURN, HERALDS A NEW ERA OF ECOLOGICAL AWARENESS—ONE IN WHICH THE GENIUS OF NATURE CAN BE HARNESSED, AS OXMAN IS DOING, TO CREATE TOOLS FOR A BETTER FUTURE. Moma Neri Oxman Cover.indd 1-3 9.01.2020 14:24 THE NERI OXMAN MATERIAL ECOLOGY CATALOGUE PAOLA ANTONELLI WITH ANNA BURCKHARDT THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK × Silk Pavilion I Imaginary Beings: Doppelgänger Published in conjunction with the exhibition Published by Neri Oxman: Material Ecology, at The Museum of The Museum of Modern Art, New York Modern Art, New York, February 22–May 25, 2020. 11 West 53 Street CONTENTS Organized by Paola Antonelli, Senior Curator, New York, New York 10019 Department of Architecture and Design, www.moma.org and Director, Research and Development; and Anna Burckhardt, Curatorial Assistant, © 2020 The Museum of Modern Art, New York 9 FOREWORD Department of Architecture and Design Certain illustrations are covered by claims to copyright cited on page 177.
    [Show full text]
  • The Londons New Routemaster Free
    FREE THE LONDONS NEW ROUTEMASTER PDF Tony Lewin,Thomas Heatherwick | 160 pages | 12 May 2014 | Merrell Publishers Ltd | 9781858946245 | English | London, United Kingdom Heatherwick Studio | Design & Architecture | New Routemaster Looks like The Londons New Routemaster article is a bit old. Be aware that information may have changed since it was published. Earlier this year, as he was stepping off the back of a New Routemaster, a friend of mine had his knee twatted by a door mechanism that was channeling the till from Open All Hours. Reeling from the pain, he wondered whether it was the The Londons New Routemaster or the bus that was to blame. Actually, it was Boris Johnson's fault. According to a promise Johnson had made to Londoners, that door was never going to be there in the first place. In his former guise as Mayor of London back inJohnson had pledged — as a flagship part of his manifesto, mind — that every New Routemaster would have a 'hop on, hop off' option, each vehicle manned by a conductor. It was going to be just like in the good old days. If that sounded too good financially reckless to be true, it was. Bythe open platform, and accompanying The Londons New Routemaster, were consigned The Londons New Routemaster the scrapheap. The conductors' job, by the way, had never been to sell tickets, which they couldn't. It was, presumably, to ensure that the mayor's encouragement for Londoners to leap at moving vehicles with Flynn-esque derring-do, didn't end up in a flurry of law suits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Garden Bridge Design Procurement
    GLA Oversight Committee The Garden Bridge Design Procurement March 2016 ©Greater London Authority March 2016 GLA Oversight Committee Members Len Duvall (Chair) Labour Tony Arbour (Deputy Chair) Conservative Jennette Arnold OBE Labour Gareth Bacon Conservative Roger Evans Conservative Darren Johnson Green Joanne McCartney Labour Caroline Pidgeon MBE Liberal Democrat Navin Shah Labour Role of the GLA Oversight Committee The GLA Oversight Committee is responsible for a range of matters, including responding on the Assembly’s behalf to formal staffing consultations from the GLA’s Head of Paid Service, monitoring scrutiny expenditure and approving the expenditure over a certain level, approving rapporteurship proposals, overseeing the programming of the Assembly’s business and recommending to the Mayor a budget proposal for the Assembly for the financial year and then allocating that budget. In addition, the GLA Oversight Committee now has responsibility for scrutinising any actions or decisions taken by the Mayor on matters relating to education. The Committee usually meets ten times a year. Contact Alison Bell, External Relations Manager Email: [email protected] Contact: 020 7983 4228 2 Contents Chair’s foreword ................................................................................................. 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Design in the First Digital
    Theory and design in the first digital age Rivka Oxman, Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel Digital design and its growing impact on design and production practices have resulted in the need for a re-examination of current design theories and methodologies in order to explain and guide future research and development. The present research postulates the requirements for a conceptual framework and theoretical basis of digital design; reviews the recent theoretical and historical background; and defines a generic schema of design characteristics through which the paradigmatic classes of digital design are formulated. The implication of this research for the formulation of ‘digital design thinking’ is presented and discussed. Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: digital design, design theory, design methodology, design thinking he evolution of digital design as a unique field of design endeavor, motivated by its own body of theoretical sources, promulgated by Ta culture of discourse, supported by new technologies, and pro- ducing unique classes of designs is a phenomenon that has been rapidly crystallizing in the past decade. Among the significances of digital design for the design theoretical community is the way that this form of highly mediated design is beginning to evolve unique design methodologies, unique forms of design interaction and unique formal content. Due to the large body of diverse publication that has accompanied these devel- opments the problem of encompassing the intellectual domain of digital design culture is, in itself, a difficult mandate. Beyond this problem of diversity, there are other, more theoretical, challenges to our interpreta- tion and understanding of digital design.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Heatherwick Presentation March 2021
    Thomas Heatherwick Designing the Extraordinary Hazel Frith March 2021 UK Pavilion Shanghai 2010 • Born 17 February 1970, now 51 • Attended Sevenoaks School • Studied what was then ‘Wood, Metal, Glass and Ceramics’, now Three-Dimensional Design, at Manchester Polytechnic • Followed by MA Royal College of Art • Mother jeweller, grandmother textile designer, great grandfather owned Jaeger Heatherwick Studio philosophy ‘The discipline of ideas’ Please note all images copyright Heatherwick Studio unless stated Three dimensional design - not multidisciplinary architecture, sculpture, furniture, metalwork, fashion Early Work Kiosk/Pavilion 1991-2 • Now owned by Cass Foundation Goodwood Sculpture Park Early Work Gazebo 1994 • RCA final project • Sponsored by Terence Conran, built in his garden • Tilting stacks of birch ply support each other structurally • 18 feet high Heatherwick Studio Founded 1994 Harvey Nichols Facade 1997 London Fashion Week • First major public design project • Ribbon of laminated birch ply winding in and out of shop frontage • ‘Playful urban surrealism’ - The Architectural Review • Won a D&AD Gold Award Materials House 1998-9 Materials Gallery, Science Museum, London • Lottery funded commission • Combines 213 different materials built up in undulating layers • Intended to be exploratory and tactile • Library describing the materials adjacent Photographs Science Museum Chandelier - Bleigiessen 2002 Wellcome Trust • 42,000 droplets of glass suspended on 27,000 high tensile wires • Hanging down through 8 floors Photography Wellcome
    [Show full text]
  • MARY PAT MCGUIRE EDUCATION ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS BOOKS BOOK CHAPTERS and CONTRIBUTIONS
    MARY PAT MCGUIRE Associate Professor Department of Landscape Architecture College of Fine and Applied Arts University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign 611 Lorado Taft Drive, Champaign Illinois 61820 e: [email protected] Professional Landscape Architect (PLA) Virginia #0406001207, Illinois #157001458 EDUCATION 2015 Leadership in Sustainability Management, Certificate University of Chicago 2003 Master of Landscape Architecture University of Virginia 2000 Woody Plants, Certificate George Washington University 1994 B.A. International Relations, International Political Theory College of William & Mary ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2020- Associate Professor, Landscape Architecture Affiliate Faculty, The Unit for Criticism and Interpretive Theory (since 2018) Director, Water Lab 2014-2020 Assistant Professor, Landscape Architecture University of Illinois, College of Fine & Applied Arts, Urbana-Champaign 2011-2014 Studio Assistant Professor, Landscape Architecture, 2011-2014 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Landscape Architecture, Spring 2011 Illinois Institute of Technology, College of Architecture, Chicago, IL 2006 Thesis Advisor [Master of Architecture Thesis] University of Maryland, School of Architecture, Planning & Preservation, College Park, MD 2005 Adjunct Assistant Professor [Spring Studio] University of Maryland, Department of Plant Science & Landscape Architecture, College Park, MD 2004 Lecturer in Landscape Architecture [Fall Studio] Morgan State University, School of Architecture & Planning, Baltimore, MD BOOKS 2021 McGuire, Mary Pat. Surface Design
    [Show full text]
  • Theories and Models of Parametric Design Thinking
    Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking Rivka Oxman, Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel The paper examines the uniqueness of seminal parametric design concepts, and their impact on models of parametric design thinking (PDT). The continuity and change within the evolution of design thinking is explored through review of key texts and theoretical concepts from early cognitive models up to current models of parametric design thinking. It is proposed that the seminal role for parametric schema, as a strategic medium of parametric design thinking, is formulated at the intersection of three bodies of knowledge: cognitive models of typological and topological design in architecture; process models of digital design; and tectonic order of material fabrication design (MFD). Differentiation is introduced as a key design strategy of PDT and is demonstrated through classification of prominent case studies. Ó 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: computational models, parametric design, design cognition, design knowledge, parametric design thinking eyond being another tool for modeling complex forms, parametric design is emerging as a unique and distinctive model of design. BBoth research and praxis in parametric design are influencing the emergence of parametric design theories that are currently undergoing a re- formulation and an epistemological shift. In parallel, the development of cur- rent tools and practices of parametric design are beginning to impact forms of parametric design thinking (PDT). Current parametric design systems are adapting to changing context under the impact of a new generation of script- ing languages and techniques (Burry, 2011), relational topological schema, associative geometries, and re-editing processes (Woodbury, 2010; Jabi, 2015) and computational process models of digital design (Oxman, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Untitled (Forever), 2017
    PUBLISHERS DISTRIBUTED BY D.A.P. SP21 CATALOG CAPTIONS PAGE 6: Georgia O’Keeffe, Series I—No. 3, 1918. Oil on Actes Sud | Archive of Modern Conflict | Arquine | Art / Books | Art Gallery of York board, 20 × 16”. Milwaukee Art Museum. Gift of Jane University | Art Insights | Art Issues Press | Artspace Books | Aspen Art Museum | Atelier Bradley Pettit Foundation and the Georgia O’Keeffe Foundation. PAGE 7: Georgia O’Keeffe, Black Mesa Éditions | Atlas Press | August Editions | Badlands Unlimited | Berkeley Art Museum | Landscape, New Mexico / Out Back of Marie’s II, 1930. Oil on canvas. 24.5 x 36”. Georgia O’Keeffe Museum, Gift Blank Forms | Bokförlaget Stolpe | Bywater Bros. Editions | Cabinet | Cahiers d’Art of the Burnett Foundation. PAGE 8: (Upper) Emil Bisttram, | Canada | Candela Books | Carnegie Museum Of Art | Carpenter Center | Center For Creative Forces, 1936. Oil on canvas, 36 x 27”. Private collection, Courtesy Aaron Payne Fine Art, Santa Fe. Art, Design and Visual Culture, UMBC | Chris Boot | Circle Books | Contemporary Art (Lower) Raymond Jonson, Casein Tempera No. 1, 1939. Casein on canvas, 22 x 35”. Albuquerque Museum, gift Museum, Houston | Contemporary Art Museum, St Louis | Cooper-Hewitt | Corraini of Rose Silva and Evelyn Gutierrez. PAGE 9: (Upper) The Editions | DABA Press | Damiani | Dancing Foxes Press | Deitch Projects Archive | Sun, c. 1955. Oil on board, 6.2 × 5.5”. Private collection. © Estate of Leonora Carrington. PAGE 10: (Upper left) DelMonico Books | Design Museum | Deste Foundation for Contemporary Art | Dia Hayao Miyazaki, [Woman] imageboard, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984). © Studio Ghibli. (Upper right) Center For The Arts | Dis Voir, Editions | Drawing Center | Dumont | Dung Beetle | Hayao Miyazaki, [Castle in the Sky] imageboard, Castle Dust to Digital | Eakins Press | Ediciones Poligrafa | Edition Patrick Frey | Editions in the Sky (1986).
    [Show full text]