DOCSLIB.ORG

The Nika Riot Author(S): J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Nika Riot Author(S): J The Nika Riot Author(s): J. B. Bury Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 17 (1897), pp. 92-119 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/623820 . Accessed: 31/07/2013 12:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.248.155.225 on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:43:10 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 92 THE NIKA RIOT. THE NIKA RIOT. THE great popular insurrection which shook the throne of Justinian in the fifth year of his reign and laid in ashes the imperial quarter of Constan- tinople has been treated again and again by historians, but never in a com- pletely satisfactory way.' Its import has not been quite clearly grasped, owing to an imperfect apprehension of the meaning of the circus factions; the sources have not been systematically correlated; the chronology has not been finally fixed; and the topographical questions have caused much perplexity. It is not therefore superfluous to submit the material to a new investigation. I do not propose to enter upon the subject of the circus factions, as they have been well treated recently by the Russian scholar, Th. Uspenski;2 but shall confine myself to problems relating to the authorities, the chronology, and the topography. I.-AUTHORITIES. The accounts of several contemporaries,some of whom were eye-witnesses of the event, have come down to us directly; two or three other contemporary notices have been preserved in the works of later writers. ? 1. The Count Marcellinus was an Illyrian by birth, like Justinian him- self. He had been an official3 in the service of Justinian when that Emperor was a Master of Soldiers in the first year of Justin. He retired from public life and embraced the clerical profession, before his patron came to the throne. The first edition of his Chronicle reached the year A.D. 518, but he sub- sequently re-edited it, bringing it down to A.D. 534. His notice of the insurrection of A.D. 532 is brief,4 but highly important, not so much for the 1 Gibbon, Decline and Fall, c. xl. 618 sqq. Lebeau, ed St. Martin, vol. 8, 184-196. J. B. Bury, Later Roman Empire, i. p. 340 W. A. Schmidt, Der Aptfstand in Constan- sqq. tinopel unter Kaiser Justinian, 1854. 2 In the Vizantiski i. p. 1 sqq. 3 VremennikE, P. Kalligas, n pl S ordEa'Ts NIKca, in Cancellarius. Justinian was mag. equitum ,r 'roi, MEA'-ratical hyor (1882), p. 329 sqq. et peditum praesentalis, in A.D. 521. See C. J. Labarte, Le Palais impdrial de Constantinople, L. 5, 8120, 3. Cp. Monmmsen,Chron. Min., 2, etc., p. 13-15. p. 41. A. Paspates, The Great Palace of Constan- 4 Ed. Mommsen, Chron. Min., 2, p. 103. It tinople, (transl. W. Metcalfe), p. 59 sqq. is strange that M. Kalligas, whose study on L. von Ranke, Weltgeschichte, ii. 2, p. 23 the Nika revolt is fuller than any other (except sqq. Schmidt's), should have entirely ignored the T. Hodgkin, Italy and her Invaders, iii. p. notice of Marcellinus. This content downloaded from 128.248.155.225 on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:43:10 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE NIKA RIOT. 93 details as for the colouring it gives to the event. The revolt is represented as a conspiracy organized by the nephews of Anastasius for their own personal ends, and not a hint is breathed of any other causes. This account is at variance with our other sources, in which the part played by Hypatius and his brothers is represented as merely an after-thought and quite unconnected with the origin of the tumult. When we remember the close personal connexion of Marcellinus with Justinian, we are justified in regarding the notice in his Chronicle as a quasi-official account. I do not mean to say that it was directly 'inspired'; I mean only that Marcellinus, in sympathy with the existing regime, gave utterance to that interpretation of the revolt which Justinian and the court wished or feigned to believe,-namely, that it was not a genuine expression of popular feeling, but merely due to the machinations of Hypatius and his friends. At the same time Marcellinus lets out a very significant fact. A large number of the higher classes took part in the insurrection.1 This confirms the statements of other sources.2 ? 2. The narrative of Procopius3 presents a marked contrast to that of Marcellinus; it is full and circumstantial, it sets forth the causes of the revolt, and, though nothing disrespectful is said, we are permitted to read between the lines that the writer's sympathy is not with Justinian, but with the nephews of Anastasius. It is abundantly clear that in the Public History Pro- copius adopted the plan of placing his own hostile criticisms on the government in the mouths of the actors who appear on the stage of his story. He might thus defy censorship. If he were called to account for enumerating the evils which Justinian's administration brought upon Italy,4 he had only to reply: 'But I was only recording the lies uttered by the barbarian Totila.' We are therefore justified in seeing a reflexion of the personal sympathies of Procopius in the last words of Hypatius: 'We are innocent. We could not resist the people. It was from no illwill to the Emperor that we entered the Hippodrome.' This is a blank denial of the view reflected in the notice of Marcellinus. The nephews of Anastasius are represented as innocent victims; the sentence of Justinian as unjust. And there is no doubt that it was the view of Procopius himself. I have said that the narrative of Procopius is circumstantial, but here it contrasts with the other circumstantial narrative which has been preserved, that of John Malalas. The historian leaves out no point essential for the com- of the prehension general course of the revolt and its political significance; but he omits a great many details where the Chronicler is circumstantial, and 1am nobilium 1 plerisque coniuratis. Mommsen, IlHermnes,6, p. 377, and in Theoph- 2 In the account of Procopius, we find the anes, p. 185, 1. 30 ed. de Boor). Cp. Panchenko, senator Origen among the rebels; and the 0 tainoi istorii Prokopiia, in Viz. Vrem., iii. property of the senators who supported Hypa- p. 302. tius is confiscated. 3 Malalas mentioned the Bell. Pers., i. c. 24 ; vol. 1, p. 119 sqq. ed. banishment of 'eighteen illustres and senators' Bonn. (omitted in the of abridgement the Baroccianus, * B. G., iii. 21, p. 340 ed. Comparetti. but preserved in the Escurial fragment ed. by This content downloaded from 128.248.155.225 on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:43:10 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 94 THE NIKA RIOT. on the other hand he is circumstantial where the Chronicler is meagre. Pro- copius summarizes the tumults and conflagrations of the first days of the rebellion, in a few lines; he omits altogether the scene in the Hippodrome on Jan. 13; and he begins his circumstantial story on the evening of Saturday, Jan. 17. The great interest in his relation is that he describes what happened in the palace. Malalas only knows what went on in the city and the Hippodrome, but the secretary of Belisarius knew the doings and the deliberations of the court, nor can there be much doubt that he was in the palace with Belisarius during the last days of the insurrection. We may, I think, safely contrast the story of Procopius with that of Malalas by saying that: Procopiusfollowed the revolt from the Palace, while in the account of Malalas the point of view is that of a spectatorin the town. ? 3. John the Lydian gives a brief account of the revolt in his treatise De Magistratibus (written after A.D. 551).1 He does not relate its course, but enumerates some of the buildings which were burned down, and states that nigh fifty thousand of the populace were killed. The main interest of his notice lies in the fact that he ascribes it mainly to the rapacity and malad- ministration of John of Cappadocia. This is significant, when we remember that the writer, although disappointed, was loyal to Justinian and had still hopes from the court which would have prevented him from saying anything offensive.2 We may infer that, after the disgrace of John of Cappadocia in A.D. 541, Justinian was willing to let fall on that minister's administration part of the blame which, when Marcellinus wrote in A.D. 534, was imputed entirely to Hypatius and his adherents. ? 4. The notice of Victor Tonnennensis, though very brief,3 supplies two points which we find in no other source. (a) Hypatius and Pompeius were slain at night.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Χρονολόγηση Γεωγραφικός Εντοπισμός Great Palace In
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Westbrook Nigel (21/12/2007) Για παραπομπή : Westbrook Nigel , "Great Palace in Constantinople", 2007, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=12205> Great Palace in Constantinople Περίληψη : The Great Palace of the byzantine emperors was the first imperial palace in Constantinople. It was founded as such, supposedly by Constantine the Great, in his newly founded capital. It remained the primary imperial palace in Constantinople up to and beyond the reign of emperor Constantine VII (913-959), in whose Book of Ceremonies its halls are named. Χρονολόγηση 4th-10th c. Γεωγραφικός εντοπισμός Constantinople, Istanbul 1. Introduction The Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors in Constantinople was the ceremonial heart of the Byzantine Empire for a millennium, and occupied a site that is now recognized as a World Heritage precinct [Fig. 1].1 The Great Palace has a high cultural and historical significance, exerting a significant influence on both Western European and Levantine palatine architecture, and forming a link between Imperial Roman and medieval palaces. It is, nonetheless, only partially understood. Its remains are largely buried under later structures, notably the Sultan Ahmet Mosque, and can only be interpreted through texts and old representations. 2. The Upper Palace, including the Daphne Palace The oldest portion of the Great Palace, the Palace of Daphne, built by Constantine the Great and his successors in the 4th and 5th centuries, was a complex that is thought to have occupied the site upon which the Sultan Ahmet, or Blue, Mosque now stands. Its immediate context comprised: the Hippodrome and adjacent palaces; the Baths of Zeuxippos; the Imperial forum or Augustaion, where Justinian I erected his equestrian statue on a monumental column in the 6th century; the churches of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Et Al JRA 2017 Post-Print
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Ward, Kate, Crow, James and Crapper, Martin Water supply infrastructure of Byzantine Constantinople. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 30. pp. 175-195. ISSN 1047-7594 Published by: UNSPECIFIED URL: This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://northumbria-test.eprints- hosting.org/id/eprint/49486/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/pol i cies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be required.) Citation: Ward, Kate, Crow, James and Crapper, Martin (2017) Water supply infrastructure of Byzantine Constantinople. Journal of Roman Archaeology. ISSN 1063-4304 (In Press) Published by: Journal of Roman Archaeology LLC URL: This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/31340/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Months (De Mensibus) (Lewiston, 2013)
    John Lydus On the Months (De mensibus) Translated with introduction and annotations by Mischa Hooker 2nd edition (2017) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .......................................................................................... iv Introduction .............................................................................................. v On the Months: Book 1 ............................................................................... 1 On the Months: Book 2 ............................................................................ 17 On the Months: Book 3 ............................................................................ 33 On the Months: Book 4 January ......................................................................................... 55 February ....................................................................................... 76 March ............................................................................................. 85 April ............................................................................................ 109 May ............................................................................................. 123 June ............................................................................................ 134 July ............................................................................................. 140 August ........................................................................................ 147 September ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Houses, Streets and Shops in Byzantine Constantinople from the fifth to the Twelfth Centuries K.R
    Journal of Medieval History 30 (2004) 83–107 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmedhist Houses, streets and shops in Byzantine Constantinople from the fifth to the twelfth centuries K.R. Dark à Research Centre for Late Antique and Byzantine Studies, The University of Reading, Humanities and Social Sciences Building, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AA, UK Abstract This paper presents an analysis and reinterpretation of current evidence for houses, streets and shops in fifth- to twelfth-century Byzantine Constantinople, focussing on archaeological evidence. Previously unidentified townhouses and residential blocks are located. These show greater similarities to Roman-period domestic architecture than might be expected. Changes in the architectural style may be related to social change in the seventh century. Berger’s reconstruction of the early Byzantine street plan is shown to be archaeologically untenable. This has implications for the identification of formal planning and the boundaries of urban districts in the Byzantine capital. The limited archaeological evidence for streets and shops is also discussed. # 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Byzantine; Constantinople; Houses; Shops; Streets; Archaeology; Cultural change 1. Introduction This paper aims to ask what archaeology can tell us about the houses, streets and shops of Byzantine Constantinople between the fifth and 12th centuries. Abundant textual sources exist for the political, ecclesiastical and intellectual history of the city, but these provide much less information about the everyday life of its inhabitants. One would suppose that archaeology ought to play a central role in elucidating these aspects of urban history, but this has not been the à E-mail address: [email protected] (K.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Infrastructure of Byzantine Constantinople
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Ward, Kate, Crow, James and Crapper, Martin (2017) Water supply infrastructure of Byzantine Constantinople. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 30. pp. 175-195. ISSN 1063- 4304 Published by: Journal of Roman Archaeology URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400074079 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400074079> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/31340/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be required.) Water supply infrastructure of Byzantine Constantinople Kate Ward, James Crow and Martin Crapper1 Introduction Modern water supply systems – hidden beneath the ground, constructed, expanded, adapted and repaired intermittently by multiple groups of people – are often messy and difficult to comprehend.
    [Show full text]
  • Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 101 (1994) 96–98 © Dr
    ROGER S. BAGNALL & KLAAS A. WORP THREE NOTES ON BYZANTINE DOCUMENTS aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 101 (1994) 96–98 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 96 THREE NOTES ON BYZANTINE DOCUMENTS 1. The Consular Date of P.Oxy. LIX 3987 This interesting nomination of a prvtodhmÒthw by the guild of leukanta¤ began with a consular date, unsurprisingly for a document of the late fifth or early sixth century, the period to which the editor, Herwig Maehler, assigns it. Only the ending of the date, ]mprotãtvn, actually survives, but the presence of a date to Phamenoth 25 (21 March) of a 10th indiction narrows the possibilities considerably. The editor argues as follows (note to line 1): “As the handwriting suggests a date in the later fifth or the earlier sixth century, Phamenoth 25 of a tenth indiction year could be 21 March 457, 472, 487, 502, 517, or 532. Of these years 532 is the only one where two clarissimi (lam- prÒtatoi) appear as consuls at the right time of year; hence the restoration given in the text, which seems to fit the space. The consuls of 502, Probus and Avienus, appear in the papyri as a pair only towards the end of the year. Earlier Probus, the eastern consul, is mentioned alone, see R. S. Bagnall,1 APF 29 (1983) 30, id. et al., The Consuls of the Later Roman Empire 539.” The reader might reasonably expect to find on the basis of this note a restoration of the post- consulate in use in early 532, p.c. Orestis et Lampadii (metå tØn Ípate¤an Flaou¤vn ÉOr°stou ka‹ Lampad¤ou t«n lamprotãtvn).
    [Show full text]
  • Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae
    The Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online Two Romes: Rome and Constantinople in Late Antiquity Lucy Grig and Gavin Kelly Print publication date: 2012 Print ISBN-13: 9780199739400 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2012 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199739400.001.0001 The Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae John Matthews DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199739400.003.0004 Abstract and Keywords The first English translation of the Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae, a crucial source for understanding the topography and urban development of early Constantinople, is presented here. This translation is accompanied, first, by an introduction to the text, and then by detailed discussion of the fourteen Regions, and finally by a conclusion, assessing the value of the evidence provided by this unique source. The discussion deals with a number of problems presented by the Notitia, including its discrepancies and omissions. The Notitia gives a vivid picture of the state of the city and its population just after its hundredth year: still showing many physical traces of old Byzantium, blessed with every civic amenity, but not particularly advanced in church building. The title Urbs Constantinopolitana nova Roma did not appear overstated at around the hundredth year since its foundation. Keywords: Byzantium, Constantinople, topography, Notitia, urban development, regions, Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae Page 1 of 50 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).
    [Show full text]
  • 25011016 Justinian
    "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 Author(s): Charles Pazdernik Source: Classical Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Oct., 1994), pp. 256-281 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016 Accessed: 12-01-2017 22:58 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Antiquity This content downloaded from 128.228.173.41 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:58:39 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms CHARLES PAZDERNIK "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 T E VIVIDNESS with which the reign of Justinian I and his empress Theodora holds our imagination emerges no less from the coloring given the period in the writings of contemporary figures than from the events themselves, however momentous they were.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Coins Elementary Manual
    ^1 If5*« ^IP _\i * K -- ' t| Wk '^ ^. 1 Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google PROTAT BROTHERS, PRINTBRS, MACON (PRANCi) Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL COMPILED BY CAV. FRANCESCO gNECCHI VICE-PRBSIDENT OF THE ITALIAN NUMISMATIC SOaETT, HONORARY MEMBER OF THE LONDON, BELGIAN AND SWISS NUMISMATIC SOCIBTIES. 2"^ EDITION RKVISRD, CORRECTED AND AMPLIFIED Translated by the Rev<> Alfred Watson HANDS MEMBF,R OP THE LONDON NUMISMATIC SOCIETT LONDON SPINK & SON 17 & l8 PICCADILLY W. — I & 2 GRACECHURCH ST. B.C. 1903 (ALL RIGHTS RF^ERVED) Digitized by Google Arc //-/7^. K.^ Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL AUTHOR S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION In the month of July 1898 the Rev. A. W. Hands, with whom I had become acquainted through our common interests and stud- ieSy wrote to me asking whether it would be agreeable to me and reasonable to translate and publish in English my little manual of the Roman Coinage, and most kindly offering to assist me, if my knowledge of the English language was not sufficient. Feeling honoured by the request, and happy indeed to give any assistance I could in rendering this science popular in other coun- tries as well as my own, I suggested that it would he probably less trouble ii he would undertake the translation himselt; and it was with much pleasure and thankfulness that I found this proposal was accepted. It happened that the first edition of my Manual was then nearly exhausted, and by waiting a short time I should be able to offer to the English reader the translation of the second edition, which was being rapidly prepared with additions and improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Justinian I the Great of Macedonia
    Basil Chulev JUSTINIAN I THE GREAT - MACEDONIAN IMPERATOR OF KONSTANTINOPOLITANA NOVA ROMA Skopje, Macedonia 2016 2 The intention of this essay is to provide simple and easy to understand retrospective of periods from medieval Macedonian and Eastern Romeian Empires history and culture. It avoids substantial and detailed explanations that consider wider historical background of the events and persons described below, and is written primarily for those approaching the topic for the first time. It also avoids complex explanatory comments or insightful footnotes on the citations from the sources. The explanatory notes are prevalently etymological. The time-frame of this essay ranges from the rule of Justin I until the end of the rule of Justinian I the Great. The interpretations given here are meant to enhance our understanding and appreciation of the Macedonian and Romeian empires that were a superpowers of the medieval world. They are focused mainly on the Macedonian aspect of the story disregarding the wider historical or socio-political perspective. All the dates and references to centuries are „AD “ except where indicated otherwise. Throughout this essay, Macedonia/Macedonians refer to the area of the mainland north of Mount Olymp. Macedonian peninsula refers to so-called 'Balkans.' Latinized/Anglicized or Macedonic names are given in parenthesis, some names and technical terms are transliterated and these will be obvious when they appear. Other technical terms and titles (e.g. Romeo, drougarrios, etc.) have been transliterated directly from their original forms with as few changes as possible: thus drouggarios rather than ' droungarios , which is neither “ Greek ” nor Latin. The terminology and concepts that are post factum inventions (like 'Balkans ' or 'Byzantium ') are largelly ignored, if not altogether avoided.
    [Show full text]