DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Parties and Elections Bill: Committee Stage Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Parties and Elections Bill: Committee Stage Report RESEARCH PAPER 08/91 Political Parties and 16 DECEMBER 2008 Elections Bill: Committee Stage Report This is a report on the Committee Stage of the Political Parties and Elections Bill 2007-08 produced in response to a recommendation of the Modernisation Committee in its report on The Legislative Process (HC 1097, 2005-06). The Bill has been reintroduced as Bill 4 of 2008-09 and is awaiting a date for report stage in the Commons. Oonagh Gay Isobel White PARLIAMENT AND CONSTITUTION CENTRE HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY RESEARCH PAPER 08/91 Recent Library Research Papers include: 08/75 Economic Indicators, October 2008 06.10.08 08/76 Social Indicators 08.10.08 08/77 Banking Bill [Bill 147 of 2007-08] 10.10.08 08/78 Unemployment by Constituency, September 2008 15.10.08 08/79 Climate Change Bill [HL]: Committee Stage Report 22.10.08 08/80 Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]: Committee 24.10.08 Stage Report 08/81 Employment Bill [HL]: Committee Stage Report 31.10.08 08/82 Economic Indicators, November 2008 04.11.08 08/83 Unemployment by Constituency, October 2008 12.11.08 08/84 US Elections 2008 14.11.08 08/85 Banking Bill: Committee Stage Report 25.11.08 08/86 Interlocking crises in the Horn of Africa 24.11.08 08/87 Small Business, Insolvency and Redundancy 25.11.08 08/88 Parliamentary Approval for Deploying the Armed Forces: An 27.11.08 Introduction to the Issues 08/89 Economic Indicators, December 2008 04.12.08 08/90 Turkey today 08.12.08 Research Papers are available as PDF files: • to members of the general public on the Parliamentary web site, URL: http://www.parliament.uk • within Parliament to users of the Parliamentary Intranet, URL: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We welcome comments on our papers; these should be sent to the Research Publications Officer, Room 407, 1 Derby Gate, London, SW1A 2DG or e-mailed to [email protected] ISSN 1368-8456 2 RESEARCH PAPER 08/91 Summary The Public Bill Committee considered the Bill in 11 sessions but did not complete its scrutiny of Clause 10 which was agreed to at the last sitting. Clauses 11, 14 and 15 were not considered by the Committee and were also agreed to. Four Government new clauses were added to the Bill. The Committee took evidence from the Lord Chancellor, Jack Straw, Ministry of Justice officials, Sir Hayden Phillips, Sir Christopher Kelly, the Electoral Commission, Professor Keith Ewing, Professor Justin Fisher, Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky and representatives of the Labour Party, the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats. The Committee was generally in agreement about the provisions in the Bill to allow politically nominated Electoral Commissioners despite opposition to this from Professor Ewing and Professor Fisher in their evidence. The Electoral Commission also expressed concern about the problems that might arise from having Commissioners who had been politically active only recently. The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats sought, unsuccessfully, to amend the Bill to require the leaders of the three main parties to nominate Commissioners to prevent a situation occurring where one party might fail to make a nomination. The Committee considered the compliance role of the Commission and there was a close division on an amendment from the Conservatives to require the Commission to publish guidance on compliance with PPERA. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and SNP did not accept the Minister’s explanation that the amendment would unnecessarily restrict the Commission’s flexibility. The amendment was defeated by 8 votes to 9. There was concern that the new section 146 and schedule 19A to PPERA inserted by the Bill would give the Commission much wider powers to enter premises and to demand documents from individuals. The Minister acknowledged concerns about the powers and indicated that the Electoral Commission was considering its position on powers to enter premises. The Committee considered several amendments to restrict the Commission’s discretion to use its new powers. The Minister set out the safeguards against arbitrary action by the Commission and moved an amendment to make clear that if the Commission suspects an offence or contravention has occurred, and it wishes to enter premises, the application for a warrant must be authorised by the Chief Executive or designated member of staff of the Commission. There were further Government amendments to require the Electoral Commission to publish guidance on the use of their powers under Schedule 1 and to require the Commission to publish reports on the use of its powers in its annual reports. The Minister also confirmed that the Commission will be required to publish guidance on how it will use the civil sanctions before it is given the power to impose them and that this guidance was expected to be issued at the same time as the guidance on investigatory powers in January 2009. The Committee considered whether the sanctions which would be made available to the Commission would be proportionate. The Minister said that the Government had decided to use the sanctions set out in the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008 in 3 RESEARCH PAPER 08/91 the Bill and indicated that the offences under PPERA which would attract civil sanctions in lieu of criminal prosecutions would be set out in secondary legislation. The Conservatives sought clarification about the use of ‘stop notices’ and the Minister said that a very high threshold must be overcome before they were used by the Commission. An amendment to require the Electoral Commission to publish an annual report on the use of its civil sanction powers was debated. Michael Wills said that the Government had been persuaded by the principles behind these amendments but would consult the Electoral Commission before proposing amendments to the Bill. The Government introduced a series of amendments to Clause 8, (declarations as to source of donations). Michael Wills said that after listening to concerns about the burden placed on parties by Clause 8 the Government had decided to raise the threshold for such declarations to be completed from £200 to £5,000 for donations to central parties and £1,000 for local accounting units. The Bill was amended accordingly. Clause 10 on triggering was not reached until 3.15pm on the last sitting day of 20 November 2008. Martin Linton (Labour) introduced amendments to establish a system whereby the candidate expenditure limits should apply from a specific point in the parliamentary cycle. Eleanor Laing (Conservative) expressed some sympathy with this amendment, but concentrated on the uncertainty of the triggering provisions prior to PPERA. David Howarth (Liberal Democrat) argued for a permanent local spending limit. However, the amendment was negatived at 4pm when the committee ran out of time for further debate. The Committee were in agreement about the provisions of Clause 12 for the administration of the electoral register if a general election fell within the annual canvass period. The Minister announced that the provision relating to the administration of the European parliamentary elections would not come into effect until after the elections on 4 June 2009. He also indicated that the Government was exploring whether it was possible for the European elections in Scotland and Wales in 2009 to be run at a local level by local authority returning officers. Three new clauses introduced by the Government were added to the Bill. New clause 17 makes provision for the responsibility for the storage of Parliamentary election documents in Scotland to be transferred to the Parliamentary returning officers. New clause 18 reforms the system for filling vacant European Parliament seats in Northern Ireland and new clause 19 relates to the Co-ordinated Online Record of Electors scheme and aims to ensure that the functions of the CORE scheme to prevent electoral fraud work effectively. The Conservatives introduced a number of new clauses to introduce individual registration of electors; to impose a moratorium on electoral pilot schemes for 5 years; to allow a committee to conduct a review of piloting; to require British citizens living overseas to provide their passport number each year they re-register; to require electors to opt in to the edited version of the electoral register instead of being required to opt out and to require voters to produce an ID document as evidence of identity at the polling station. None of these new clauses were added to the Bill. 4 RESEARCH PAPER 08/91 CONTENTS I Provisions of the Bill 7 II Second Reading 8 III Committee Stage 10 A. Evidence sessions 10 1. Electoral fraud 10 2. Hayden Phillips’s proposals 11 3. ‘Triggering’ 11 4. Donations 12 5. Electoral Commission 13 B. Consideration of the Bill by the Committee 13 1. Electoral Commissioners 13 2. Compliance role of the Commission 15 3. Investigatory powers of the Commission 15 4. Civil sanctions 18 5. Other electoral provisions 22 6. Individual voter registration 24 7. Declarations on donations – Government amendments to Clause 8 25 8. Party funding issues 27 9. Triggering - Clause 10 28 10. Other amendments which were not debated 28 C. Operation of the Committee 29 D. Carry over of the bill to session 2008-09 29 Appendix I Members of the Public Bill Committee 31 Appendix II Stages of the Bill 32 5 RESEARCH PAPER 08/91 6 RESEARCH PAPER 08/91 I Provisions of the Bill The Bill takes forward the proposals for immediate legislation in the white paper, Party finance and expenditure in the UK, published in June 2008, with some modifications.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decarbonising Aid: Why We Must Stop UK Financing for Fossil Fuels Overseas Table 1: CDC’S Direct Investments in Fossil Fuel Infrastructure
    Campaign briefing Decarbonising aid Why we must stop UK financing for fossil fuels overseas May 2020 Photo: decoalonize.org CC: BY-NC-SA 2.0 Environmental activists in Kenya are determined to show that coal has no place in the country’s energy future. Why aid for fossil fuels must end • These investments are only one part of UK public financing for fossil fuels overseas which undermine • The world has ten years to decarbonise the global the government’s national commitments on economy and limit global temperature rises to emissions reductions. Since the Paris Agreement O 1.5 C – the target set by the Paris Agreement in was signed, approximately £568 million of UK aid 2015. This is an absolutely crucial demand for has been invested in fossil fuel projects overseas. frontline communities whose lands and livelihoods If we include export credits provided by UK Export will be destroyed by climate breakdown. Finance (UKEF) for fossil fuels, that number rises to • The UK government argues that investing in oil and £3.9 billion. gas is a good medium-term alternative to coal • Despite claims to be supporting a transition to power for countries in the global south. However, cleaner energy, CDC has £213 million of active this argument has been thoroughly debunked as investments in projects using the most polluting it will create fossil fuel dependency and lock in fuels, including diesel and heavy fuel oil.2 In 1 high carbon emissions for generations to come. countries including Ghana, CDC’s projects are also • UK aid is legally required to be spent on poverty contributing to the privatisation of energy systems, reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • FCO Annual Report & Accounts 2016
    Annual Report & Accounts: 2016 - 2017 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 (For the year ended 31 March 2017) Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Annual Report presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 July 2017 HC 15 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Finance Directorate, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH Print ISBN 9781474142991 Web ISBN 9781474143004 ID P002873310 07/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Designed in-house by the FCO Communication Directorate Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2016 - 2017 - Contents Contents Foreword by the Foreign Secretary ......................................................................................... 1 Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 9 November 2020 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:12 P.M., 09 November 2020). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 8 Licensed Premises: BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Coronavirus 20 INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 8 Life Sciences 20 Beer: Small Businesses 8 Low Pay: Coronavirus 21 Bounce Back Loan Scheme: Nuclear Power 22 Sussex 8 Nuclear Power Stations: Business: Coronavirus 9 Finance 22 Carbon Emissions 11 Nuclear Reactors 22 Consumer Goods: Safety 11 Overseas Students: EU Coronavirus: Disease Control 12 Nationals 23 Coronavirus: Remote Working 12 Personal Care Services: Coronavirus 23 Coronavirus: Social Distancing 13 Political Parties: Coronavirus 24 Debenhams: Coronavirus 13 Post Office: Legal Costs 24 Economic Situation: Coronavirus 14 Post Offices: ICT 25 Electronic Commerce: Renewable Energy 25 Regulation 14 Research: Public Consultation 27 Energy Supply 15 Research: Publishing 27 Energy: Meters 15 Retail Trade: Coventry 28 Erasmus+ Programme and Shipping: Tees Valley 28 Horizon Europe 16 Solar power: Faversham 29 Fireworks: Safety 16 Unemployment: Coronavirus 29 Green Homes Grant Scheme 17 Weddings: Coronavirus 30 Horizon Europe 18 Wind Power 31 Housing: Energy 19 Hydrogen 20 CABINET OFFICE 31 Musicians: Coronavirus 44 Ballot Papers: Visual Skateboarding: Coronavirus 44 Impairment 31
    [Show full text]
  • Her Majesty's Government and Her Official Opposition
    Her Majesty’s Government and Her Official Opposition The Prime Minister and Leader of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP || Leader of the Labour Party Jeremy Corbyn MP Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Chief Whip). He will attend Cabinet Rt Hon Mark Spencer MP remains || Nicholas Brown MP Treasurer of HM Household (Deputy Chief Whip) Stuart Andrew MP appointed Vice Chamberlain of HM Household (Government Whip) Marcus Jones MP appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer Rt Hon Rishi Sunak MP appointed || John McDonnell MP Chief Secretary to the Treasury - Cabinet Attendee Rt Hon Stephen Barclay appointed || Peter Dowd MP Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury Kemi Badenoch MP appointed Paymaster General in the Cabinet Office Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt MP appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Minister for the Cabinet Office Rt Hon Michael Gove MP remains Minister of State in the Cabinet Office Chloe Smith MP appointed || Christian Matheson MP Secretary of State for the Home Department Rt Hon Priti Patel MP remains || Diane Abbott MP Minister of State in the Home Office Rt Hon James Brokenshire MP appointed Minister of State in the Home Office Kit Malthouse MP remains Parliamentary Under Secretary of State in the Home Office Chris Philp MP appointed Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, and First Secretary of State Rt Hon Dominic Raab MP remains || Emily Thornberry MP Minister of State in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Rt Hon James Cleverly MP appointed Minister of State in the Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberal Democrat Journey to a LIB-Con Coalition and Where Next?
    The LiberaL Democrat Journey To a LIB-CoN CoaLITIoN aNd where NexT? Southbank house, Black Prince road, London Se1 7SJ T: +44 (0) 20 7463 0632 | [email protected] www.compassonline.org.uk richard S Grayson The LiberaL Democrat Journey To a LIB-CoN CoaLITIoN – aNd where NexT? richard S Grayson 2 about the author Dr Richard Grayson is Head of Politics at Goldsmiths, University of London, and is one of three vice-chairs of the Liberal Democrat Federal Policy Committee, but writes here in a personal capacity. He was the party’s Director of Policy in 1999–2004 and stood for Parliament in Hemel Hempstead in 2005 and 2010, adding over 10% to the party’s vote. He was one of the founders of the Social Liberal Forum and was the first chair of its Executive. In September 2010 he takes up the post of Professor of Twentieth Century History at Goldsmiths. Published by Compass − Direction for the Democratic Left Ltd Southbank House, Black Prince Road, London SE1 7SJ T: +44 (0) 207 463 0632 [email protected] www.compassonline.org.uk Designed by SoapBox, www.soapboxcommunications.co.uk 3 The Liberal democrat ning both needs to be understood. Doing so begins with a story about how it is possible that a journey to a Lib–Con party which has often over the past decade been seen as ‘left of Labour’ on civil liberties, demo - coalition – and where cratic reform, taxation and public services is engaged quite so enthusiastically in reducing the next? size of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary
    Thursday Volume 664 26 September 2019 No. 343 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 26 September 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 843 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 Speaker’s Statement 844 there will be an urgent question later today on the House of Commons matter to which I have just referred, and that will be an opportunity for colleagues to say what they think. This is something of concern across the House. It is Thursday 26 September 2019 not a party political matter and, certainly as far as I am concerned, it should not be in any way, at any time, to any degree a matter for partisan point scoring. It is The House met at half-past Nine o’clock about something bigger than an individual, an individual party or an individual political or ideological viewpoint. Let us treat of it on that basis. In the meantime, may I just ask colleagues—that is all I am doing and all I can PRAYERS do as your representative in the Chair—please to lower the decibel level and to try to treat each other as opponents, not as enemies? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con): On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Speaker’s Statement Mr Speaker: Order. I genuinely am not convinced, but I will take one point of order if the hon. Gentleman Mr Speaker: Before we get under way with today’s insists.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Justice New Approaches to the Criminal Justice System
    Criminal Justice Alliance Transforming Justice New approaches to the criminal justice system Edited by Jon Collins and Susanna Siddiqui December 2009 This collection of essays is published by the Criminal Justice Alliance. However, the views contained in the essays are those of the authors alone, and not necessarily those of the Criminal Justice Alliance or its member organisations. About the Criminal Justice Alliance The Criminal Justice Alliance (formerly the Penal Affairs Consortium) is a coalition of organisations committed to improving the criminal justice system. It has 46 members - including campaigning charities, voluntary sector service providers, research institutions, staff associations and trade unions - bringing together a wide range of organisations involved in policy and practice across the criminal justice system. For more information on the Criminal Justice Alliance and our work visit www.criminaljusticealliance.org Criminal Justice Alliance Park Place 10-12 Lawn Lane London, sw8 1ud Tel 020 7840 1207 Email [email protected] The Criminal Justice Alliance is a company limited by guarantee. Registered company number: 6331413, incorporated in England and Wales. The Criminal Justice Alliance is extremely grateful to our funders, the Barrow Cadbury Trust, the City Parochial Foundation, the Monument Trust and the Tudor Trust, for their support. Criminal Justice Alliance Transforming Justice New approaches to the criminal justice system Edited by Jon Collins and Susanna Siddiqui Contents 5 CONTRIBUTORS’ BIOGRAPHIES
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Process
    House of Commons Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1097 House of Commons Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 25 July 2006 HC 1097 Published on 7 September 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons is appointed by the House of Commons to consider how the House operates and to make recommendations for modernisation. Current membership Mr Jack Straw (Labour, Blackburn) (Chairman) Mr Paul Burstow, (Liberal Democrat, Sutton & Cheam) Ms Dawn Butler (Labour, Brent South) Ann Coffey (Labour, Stockport) Mr George Howarth (Labour, Knowsley North & Sefton East) Mr Greg Knight (Conservative, Yorkshire East) Mark Lazarowicz (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Mrs Theresa May (Conservative, Maidenhead) Mr Adrian Sanders, (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Richard Shepherd (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Paddy Tipping (Labour, Sherwood) Mr Edward Vaizey (Conservative, Wantage) Lynda Waltho (Labour, Stourbridge) Sir Nicholas Winterton (Conservative, Macclesfield) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Liz Blackman (Labour, Erewash) Chris Grayling (Conservative, Epsom and Ewell) Mr David Heath (Liberal Democrat, Somerton and Frome) Mr Geoffrey Hoon (Labour, Ashfield) (Chairman) Jessica Morden (Labour, Newport East) Andrew Stunell (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in an Appendix to the House of Commons Standing Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Reform Put on Hold in This Issue
    | THE CONSTITUTION UNIT NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 41 | JANUARY 2009 | MONITOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM PUT ON HOLD IN THIS ISSUE Amidst the gathering economic gloom the be considered against the ‘backdrop’ of declining government’s constitutional reform plans are voter turn-out. The Conference’s mandate to PARLIAMENT 2 being quietly shelved. After the fanfare for The discover ways to make parliament’s membership Governance of Britain in summer 2007, the mirror the diversity in the UK population at large draft Constitutional Renewal Bill was greeted by is as urgent as ever: since 1918 a total of 4,659 PARTIES AND ELECTIONS 2-3 parliamentarians as a bit of a disappointment when Members have been elected to Parliament. Of they scrutinised its detailed proposals a year later. these, just 291 (6%) have been women. Of 646 That might be why the Constitutional Renewal current Members, only 15 are black or Asian. WATCHDOGS 3 Bill did not feature in the legislative programme announced in the Queen’s Speech in November. Speaker’s Conferences are rare: this will be only the sixth ever. Five were formed in the It may yet be included; but more likely is that CHURCH AND STATE 3 some proposals (eg the Civil Service bill) will be 20th century to consider reforms to the electoral introduced separately, in the summer. system, such as seat distribution and minimum voting age. They embody a parliamentary HUMAN RIGHTS 3 A similar sense of slippage afflicts plans for convention that controversial changes to electoral a British Bill of Rights. The government first law should be agreed on an all-party basis, promised to publish a consultation paper by the although this convention has not always been DEVOLUTION 4-5 spring of 2008; then the summer; then the autumn.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Liberalism: a Local Approach to the Low Carbon Economy
    Rt Hon Nick Clegg MP Martin Garratt Deputy prime minister Chief executive, Cambridge Cleantech Duncan Brack Vice chair, Liberal Democrats Dr Julian Huppert Federal Policy Committee MP for Cambridge Duncan Hames Christoph Harwood MP for Chippenham Partner, Marksman Consulting Simon Roberts OBE Lord Shipley OBE Chief executive, Centre for Adviser to Rt Hon Greg Clark Sustainable Energy MP, minister for cities Cllr Keith House Colin Skellett OBE Leader, Eastleigh Borough Chairman, West of England Council Local Enterprise Partnership Merlin Hyman Juliet Davenport OBE Chief executive, Regen SW CEO & founder, Good Energy Green liberalism: a local approach to the low carbon economy Green liberalism: © Green Alliance 2013 Green Alliance’s work is licensed a local approach to the low carbon economy under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 3.0 unported Published by Green Alliance, September 2013 licence. This does not replace ISBN 978-1-905869-98-5 copyright but gives certain rights without having to ask Green Alliance for permission. Designed by Howdy and printed by Park Lane Press Under this licence, our work may Edited by Matthew Spencer, Hannah Kyrke-Smith and Karen Crane be shared freely. This provides the freedom to copy, distribute and transmit this work on to others, provided Green Alliance is credited This has been published under Green Alliance’s Green Roots as the author and text is unaltered. programme which aims to stimulate green thinking within the This work must not be resold or three dominant political traditions in the UK. Similar collections used for commercial purposes. These conditions can be waived are being published under ‘Green social democracy’ and ‘Green under certain circumstances with conservatism’ projects.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2015 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Prime Minister 3 Attorney General’s Office 5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6 Cabinet Office 8 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 12 Ministry of Defence 14 Department for Education 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 18 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20 Department of Health 22 Home Office 24 Department for International Development 26 Ministry of Justice 27 Northern Ireland Office 30 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 31 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 32 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 33 Scotland Office 34 Department for Transport 35 HM Treasury 37 Wales Office 39 Department for Work and Pensions 40 Government Whips – Commons 42 Government Whips – Lords 46 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list in writing of all relevant interests known to them which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
    [Show full text]