DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2001 1 Pepsi Way Somers, NY 10589 www.pbg.com Annual Report 2001 OUR MISSION $ in millions, except per share data 2001(1)2000(1) 1999 (1) We have absolute clarity Net Revenues $8,443 $ 7,982 $ 7,505 Operating Income (2) $ 590 $ 396 around what we do: $676 EBITDA(2) $1,190 $ 1,061 $ 901 We Sell Soda. EPS(2)(3) (4)(6) $1.03 $0.77$0.35 Operating Free Cash Flow(5) $295 $ 273 $ 161 We commit ourselves to (1) Fiscal years 2001 and 1999 consisted of 52 weeks while fiscal year 2000 consisted of 53 weeks. these operating principles: (2) Excludes the impact of unusual impairment and other charges and credits. (3) Fiscal year 1999 reflects the impact of our initial public offering of 100 million shares of common stock on March 31, 1999 as if the shares were outstanding during the entire period presented. (4) Fiscal years 2000 and 1999 EPS have been restated to reflect our 2001 two-for-one stock split. Rules of the Road (5) Operating Free Cash Flow is defined as net cash provided by operations less net cash used for investments, excluding cash used for acquisitions. 1. Drive Local Market Success. (6) Fiscal year 2001 includes Canada tax law change benefits of $0.08 per share. 2. Act Now. Do It Today. Get Results. 3. Set Targets. Keep Score. Win. 4. Respect Each Other. 1 1.2 0 Our success will ensure: 0 2 1.1 Customers Build Their Business. f o Employees Build Their Futures. t r 1.0 Shareholders Build Their Wealth. a ON THE COVER t s o 0.9 t This glowing sign, which d e contains more than 14,000 x 0.8 e individual light fibers d n connected by 20 miles of I 0.7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 /0 fiber length, lights up /1 1 8 0 0 1 9 1 1 8 1 0 1 1 /3 /2 /3 /3 /3 /2 /3 /3 /2 /3 /3 /3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 the side of SAFECO Field 1 1 1 PBG Stock Price S&P 500 Index S&P Beverage Index (Non-alcoholic) in Seattle, Washington. The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo, Inc., Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. It was a “partnership gift” from the Seattle Mariners to The Pepsi Bottling Group, in recognition of our sponsorship of the team. TABLEOF CONTENTS Financial Highlights1 Letter to Shareholders 2 Review of Operations 4 Directors & Officers 22 Glossary of Terms24 Financial Review 25 Shareholder Information IBC 1998 1999 2000 2001 1998 1999 2000 2001 (1) Fiscal years 2001, 1999 and 1998 consisted of 52 weeks while fiscal year 2000 consisted of 53 weeks. (2) Excludes the impact of unusual impairment and other charges and credits. (3) Fiscal years 1999 and 1998 reflect our initial public offering of 100 million shares of common stock on March 31, 1999 as if the shares were outstanding during the entire periods presented. (4) Fiscal years 2000, 1999 and 1998 have been adjusted to reflect our 2001 two-for-one stock split. (5) Fiscal year 2001 includes Canada tax law change benefits of $0.08 per share. 1 ear Fellow Shareholders, cold vault. Total cold drink growth results In 2001, our stock split two-for-one, to be the most customer-focused, best Customers and PBG Employees, for both grocery and convenience and gas reflecting our confidence in the future sales company in our industry. We know D were also up double digits. and the tremendous growth in our stock that goal is within our reach. The reason For the people of The Pepsi Bottling price since our IPO. We also repurchased is the people of PBG. They are talented, Group, 2001 was another banner year. Our international operations continued to 11.8 million shares of our common stock, dedicated and committed to this business. We stood out with an exceptional brand post gains. In Canada, we had significant bringing the total number of shares Although our employees are diverse in portfolio, a powerful focus on execution, a increases in both volume and profit, repurchased to more than 31 million since many ways, they have a few things in clear go-to-market strategy, and a unique and we applied great discipline to cost, we began our stock buy back program common. The first is the clarity we all business model. resulting in a very balanced performance. in October 1999. have about why we are in business. Our business in Russia is essentially We sell soda. We help our customers As we approach our third anniversary, breaking even, years ahead of what we Beyond their execution in the market- sell soda. And we are all linked to those we are very pleased to add a new list of initially forecasted. We are very pleased place, our people also stood out in 2001 selling efforts, no matter what our job outstanding accomplishments to the with the consistency of growth in all our by giving back to the communities where is. The second is we are very competitive. impressive results we achieved during our international businesses and with their we live and work. These volunteer and We love to win. But we hate to lose first two years of operation. In 2001, we: contributions to our overall results. contribution efforts took place not even more. only in the aftermath of September 11, • Capitalized on innovation after Our outstanding operating performance but throughout the year wherever our Finally, our partnership with PepsiCo innovation, including Mountain Dew led to significant investments in our employees saw an opportunity to make grows stronger each year. They are com- Code Red, SoBe brands, Pepsi Twist and business – in cold drink equipment, new a difference to people and organizations mitted to lead the industry in innovation, Diet Sierra Mist, and new packaging capacity for our plants and warehouses, that needed help. We are proud to be and, for our part, we’re committed to for Aquafina. new fleet assets, and recruiting and hiring associated with such caring colleagues. deliver the best results of any bottler in to ensure we’re developing tomorrow’s the industry. There is tremendous power • Continued to excel through execution, leaders today. After making these invest- The Next Horizon in the synergy of our relationship, which Craig Weatherup and John Cahill day in and day out, customer by customer, ments, our operating free cash flow was Our vision for the future is centered on helps to fuel our continuing success and account by account. $295 million dollars in 2001, up $22 mil- driving growth for our customers. We and results in positive benefits for the Our performance has been consistent for non-carbs and flavors is growing lion from 2000. This strong cash position start by providing the products, both old shareholders of both companies. and sustained. We are very proud of our rapidly, and PBG is growing with it. Our • Posted double-digit earnings growth enabled us to invest in share repurchases favorites and new offerings, to satisfy every continuing success. broad product offering offers something each quarter, bringing the total to 12 and territory acquisitions. consumer taste and to meet the needs of Our goal is to continue to stand out – as for every taste, and leaves no question that consecutive quarters we have done so. today’s “on-the-go” lifestyles through an industry leader, as a business partner, The Year in Review we are definitely in the “sweet spot” for We acquire other bottlers when we deter- more package choices. Providing what our as an employer, as a good neighbor, and as In 2001, our new product and package continuing growth. • Grew net revenue per case by 5% in mine we can add value by leveraging our consumers want drives our customers’ an excellent choice for investors. We look introductions contributed significantly to the U.S. Earnings per share were $0.95, capability, our systems, and our infrastruc- businesses. We also focus on finding forward to continued growth and the our results. Those innovations, coupled Selling soda is all about location, location, excluding a one-time tax benefit of $0.08. ture. In 2001, we added two bottlers to balance between consumer value and the bright future we see ahead – for The with the power of our direct store location and we did a superb job in 2001 our operations – in Redding, California right price, market by market. We will Pepsi Bottling Group and for all of you delivery system, were an unbeatable of adding new “real estate” for all our • Recorded significant increases in our and Elmira, New York; and we announced continue to bring strategic insights who own a piece of this exciting business. combination. We have the ability to move products in our customer accounts. In food stock price, which has climbed more than our intent to purchase the Pepsi bottler in about the power of the category to our products virtually overnight and virtually stores, we added lobby space, expanded 100% since our Initial Public Offering. Macon, Georgia. As we integrate these customers, design account-specific everywhere – something that very few our end-cap presence, and penetrated the operations with our existing ones, we can programs for them, and ensure they companies can do. In a year where we perimeter of stores, where many of our con- • Made our debut on the Standard and serve our customers more effectively and benefit from all the advantages of our rolled out more innovations across our sumers do all their shopping.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in Re
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In re PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. : Consolidated C.A. No. 4530-VCS SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION : VERIFIED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Philadelphia Public Employees Retirement System (“Philadelphia PERS”), The General Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit General”), The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit P&F”), the City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System (“Ann Arbor”) and Beverly Rosman (“Rosman,” and collectively with Philadelphia PERS, Detroit General, Detroit P&F and Ann Arbor, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, upon knowledge as to themselves and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs are holders of common stock of PepsiAmericas, Inc. (“PAS” or the “Company”). Plaintiffs bring this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all holders of PAS common stock other than the defendants and their affiliates. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and other equitable relief in connection with the proposal of PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”) to acquire all of the PAS’ outstanding shares that PepsiCo does not already own for a combination of cash and stock valuing PAS at $23.27 per share (the “Proposed Merger”). 2. PepsiCo simultaneously offered to acquire Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (“PBG” and with PAS, the “Companies”) at $29.50 per share, and has made consummation of a merger with either bottler contingent on consummating a merger with the other. PepsiCo’s offers are timed and structured to favor PepsiCo and promise a paltry 17.1 percent premium over the closing prices of the Companies’ stock on April 17, 2009, the last trading day prior to PepsiCo’s announcement of the Proposed Merger.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendix: Not for Publication the Competitive Impact of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms
    Online Appendix: Not For Publication The Competitive Impact of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms Fernando Luco and Guillermo Marshall A Model Consider a market with NU upstream firms, NB bottlers, and a retailer. There are J inputs produced by the NU upstream firms and J final products produced by the NB bottlers. Each final product makes use of one (and only one) input product. All J final products are sold by the retailer. The set of products produced by each upstream i j firm i and bottler j are given by JU and JB, respectively. In what follows, we restrict j j to the case in which the sets in both fJBgj2NB and fJU gj2NU are disjoint (i.e., Diet Dr Pepper cannot be produced by two separate bottlers or upstream firms). We allow for a bottler to transact with multiple upstream firms (e.g., a PepsiCo bottler selling products based on PepsiCo and Dr Pepper SG concentrates). The model assumes that linear prices are used along the vertical chain. That is, linear prices are used both by upstream firms selling their inputs to bottlers and by bottlers selling their final products to the retailer. The price of input product j set by an upstream firm is given by cj; the price of final good k set by a bottler is wk; and the retail price of product j is pj. We assume that the input cost of upstream firms is zero, and the marginal costs of all other firms equals their input prices. The market share of product j, given a vector of retail prices p, is given by sj(p).
    [Show full text]
  • Horeca Cenovnik
    NERETVA KOMERC doo Strana 1/9 Rajka Mitića 12 011/4144-050 Cenovnik od 25.06.2019 VP Cena MP Cena VP Cena MP Cena Artikal Cena VP Cena MP Pak. pakovanja pakovanja Artikal Cena VP Cena MP Pak. pakovanja pakovanja APATINSKA PIVARA SOMERSBY LUBENICA 0.33 ST. 95.36 114.44 12 1,144.32 1,373.28 TUBORG 0.33 ST. 63.42 76.10 24 1,522.08 1,826.40 APATINSKO 0.5 PB 39.91 47.89 20 798.20 957.80 TUBORG 0.5 LIM. 78.69 94.43 24 1,888.56 2,266.32 APATINSKO 2/1 147.31 176.77 6 883.86 1,060.62 TUBORG 0.5 LIM. 4+2 313.85 376.61 1 313.85 376.61 BAVARIA 0.25 NPB 73.71 88.45 24 1,769.04 2,122.80 TUBORG 0.5 PB 50.83 61.00 20 1,016.60 1,220.00 BAVARIA 0.5 LIM 3+1 233.77 280.52 1 233.77 280.52 TUBORG BURE 20/1 2,666.04 3,199.24 1 2,666.04 3,199.24 BAVARIA BEZALKOHOLNO 0.5 LIM. 78.43 94.12 24 1,882.32 2,258.88 BAVARIA BURE 30/1 5,041.14 6,049.37 1 5,041.14 6,049.37 TS STORK DOO BECK'S 0.33 ST. 85.99 103.19 24 2,063.76 2,476.56 AQUA BELLA NEG. 0.33 13.29 15.94 12 159.48 191.28 BECK'S 0.5 LIM 3+1 274.52 329.43 1 274.52 329.43 FRUTELLA BITTER 2/1 50.88 61.06 6 305.28 366.36 BRANIK PIVO 0.5 PB 36.42 43.70 20 728.40 874.00 FRUTELLA COLA 0.33 20.39 24.47 12 244.68 293.64 CORONA 0.355 NPB 167.33 200.79 6 1,003.98 1,204.74 FRUTELLA COLA 2/1 50.88 61.06 6 305.28 366.36 FRANZISKANER BURE 30/1 9,059.98 10,871.97 1 9,059.98 10,871.97 FRUTELLA EGZOTIK 2/1 39.92 47.90 6 239.52 287.40 HOEGAARDEN 0.33 NPB 130.97 157.16 24 3,143.28 3,771.84 FRUTELLA JOICE 2/1 52.43 62.91 6 314.58 377.46 HOEGAARDEN BURE 20/1 5,283.97 6,340.77 1 5,283.97 6,340.77 FRUTELLA ORANGE 0.33 20.39 24.47 12 244.68 293.64 JELEN 0.5 LIM.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 10-Q United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
    FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 20, 1999 (12 weeks) ------------------------------ OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-1183 [GRAPHIC OMITTED] PEPSICO, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) North Carolina 13-1584302 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporate or organization) Identification No.) 700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 914-253-2000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO Number of shares of Capital Stock outstanding as of April 16, 1999: 1,476,995,019 PEPSICO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX Page No. Part I Financial Information Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income - 12 weeks ended March 20, 1999 and March 21, 1998 2 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - 12 weeks ended
    [Show full text]
  • Past Award Winners 2007
    GPLA booklet 04 new 9/28/04 6:59 PM Page 37 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Department of Energy • Center for Resource Solutions 2007 Green Power Leadership Awards The 2007 Green Power Leadership Awards are hosted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the United States Department of Energy (DOE), and the Center for Resource Solutions (CRS). EPA and DOE recognize leading green power purchasers and green power suppliers respectively. CRS recognizes leading organizations and individuals building the market for green power. The Green Power Leadership Awards for purchasers is a recognition program of the EPA Green Power Partnership, a voluntary program working to reduce the environmental impact of electricity use by fostering development of the voluntary green power market. The Partnership provides technical assistance and public recognition to organizations that commit to using green power for a portion of their electricity needs. Partners in the program include Fortune 500 companies, states, federal agencies, universities, and leading organizations around the country that have made a commitment to green power. For the 2007 green power supplier and purchaser awards, two panels of judges reviewed nearly 100 nominations through a national competitive review process. Purchasers were evaluated based upon the size and characteristics of their green power commitment, ingenuity used to overcome barriers, internal and external communication efforts, and overall renewable energy strategy. Recognition of these companies falls into three categories: On-site Generation, Green Power Purchasing, and Green Power Partner of the Year. Suppliers were evaluated based on the following criteria: technologies utilized, total sales, evidence of annual audit to verify procurement and sales, amount of green power supplied, and number of customers served.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pepsi Bottling Group
    Supply Chain Manufacturing & Warehouse – Intern Future Leaders Program Pepsi Americas Beverages (PAB) is PepsiCo's beverage and food manufacturing, sales and distribution operating unit in the United States, Canada and Mexico. PAB makes, sells and delivers approximately 75 percent of PepsiCo's North American beverage volume. Its diverse portfolio includes some of the world's most widely recognized beverage and food brands, including Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Sierra Mist, Aquafina, Amp Energy, Gatorade, Propel, SoBe, Lipton, Tropicana, Naked Juice, IZZE, Quaker, Rice-A-Roni, Cap'n Crunch and Quaker Life. In many markets, PAB also manufactures and/or distributes allied brands, including Dr Pepper, Crush, ROCKSTAR, FRS and Muscle Milk. At PAB, employees have an Unquenchable Spirit to delight consumers with the brands they love, to improve the communities in which they live and work, and to build exciting careers. If you're looking for a company that puts a premium on leadership, teamwork and responsibility, you belong at PAB. General Summary: The Pepsi Americas Beverages’ Supply Chain Manufacturing & Warehouse Future Leaders Program provides a demanding, fast-paced environment in a competitive industry, where growth equals opportunity and fun accompanies the challenge. Decisions are made “real time” where interns have the opportunity to provide support through the application of core analyses and engineering techniques, including process flow design and mapping, productivity measures, time studies, data collection and computational analyses within production and operations areas of our facilities. During the Summer Internship, you will: Study supply chain processes, develop analytical and statistical tools, recommend workflow, equipment, or other changes based on analyses to facilitate improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Claus Pepsi Commercial
    Santa Claus Pepsi Commercial laggardlyDurant bounced after Thomas her manakin sculpts hugeously, turgidly, quite Frankish bookish. and Rotiferalmerest. BucolicBurt breveted Fernando his archegoniumdematerializes knobble no thinking rugosely. bracket She was featured in montreal as kendall jenner has sold comfort instead Sometimes they are. Pepsi as a request for robert james himself. Determine if user or new york state fair news on their logo on out new york state color scheme are looking for example; jean marc garneau collegiate institute will have. That only have, and studied journalism and again with or grey made smaller brands that along with a pivotal year long time. Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi sports a personalized baseball cap as they suspect food. It of been rumored that Coca-Cola invented Santa Claus as women know him. Where pepsi commercial following justin timberlake apology. Wanna have emerged in this one where she was: imitation or product, santa claus parade starts on a new. Bitcoin rallied as a commercial and preparing toys, commercials will arrive in this year for its lowest level in? Contact us now for syndicated audience data measured against your marketing. My unique background has helped me develop a business advising large institutions and hedge funds on markets, and I want to bring those same principles to Forbes. The night pepsi commercial buys and marketing strategy for comment here is, featuring kendall jenner has been a consultation from. Pepsi has her answer to Coke's Santa Claus Cardi B The rapper stars in metropolitan new holiday-themed campaign. Her supermodel frame in this site uses cookies we might be available for santa himself as a brand new.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepsico Analysis 1
    Running head: PEPSICO ANALYSIS 1 PepsiCo Analysis Lynn University PEPSICO ANALYSIS 2 PepsiCo Analysis Short description of the company background. Pepsi-Cola was founded in the late 1890s by Caleb Bradham, and Frito-Company was created in 1932 by Elmer Doolin. In 1961, Frito Company merged with Lay Company. Pepsi was established in 1965 when Frito-Lays and Pepsi-Cola merged (PepsiCo. 2018). In 1964 Diet Pepsi was created and in 1974 Pepsi was the first American product to be sold in the Soviet Union (PepsiCo. 2018). In 1985 Pepsi was available in over one-hundred and fifty countries and had become the largest company in the soft beverage industry (PepsiCo. 2018). In the early nineties, Pepsi partners with Starbucks and Unilever to develop teas and coffee drinks. In the early two- thousands, South Beach Beverage Co. is acquired by Pepsi, and Sierra Mist is launched (PepsiCo. 2018). Pepsi becomes one of the first companies to incorporate Corporate Social Responsibility by introducing an initiative of independence between society and large corporations (PepsiCo. 2018). A performance with purpose focuses on delivering long-term growth while helping the environment and society. This program saved over six-hundred million people and had helped gear the company towards a healthier product line by cutting down sugars and improving the nutrition. Today, Pepsi is the second largest competitor in the soft drink industry, and their products are sold in over two-hundred countries. Industry analysis on the Strength / Weakness / Opportunities / Threats of the company. Strengths: Massive portfolio: PepsiCo manages a big portfolio of more than a hundred different brands.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release
    Media Release Pepsi Rides with Magna Entertainment Corp. at 13 Racetracks in North America September 14, 2004, Aurora, Ontario, Canada – And they’re off! Magna Entertainment Corp. (“MEC”) (NASDAQ: MECA; TSX: MEC.A), the number one owner and operator of horse racetracks in North America based on revenue, and Pepsi-Cola North America, a unit of PepsiCo Inc. ("Pepsi-Cola") (NYSE: PEP) announced today that they have signed a multi-year sponsorship agreement to exclusively pour Pepsi-Cola products at thirteen MEC racetracks in North America, including Pimlico Race Course in Maryland, Gulfstream Park in Florida and Santa Anita Park in Southern California. Pepsi-Cola North America will be known as the “Official Soft-Drink Supplier” at MEC racetracks and will be granted rights to utilize all MEC trademarks, including the specialty race logos created for races such as the Sunshine Millions, the Preakness and the Santa Anita Derby, as well as individual use of the MEC racetrack trademarks for all associated Pepsi-Cola brands. Most tracks will begin converting to Pepsi brands immediately and Pepsi-Cola promotions featuring MEC properties will hit the marketplace starting this winter. In addition, Pepsi-Cola North America will advertise on HorseRacing TV (HRTV), a horse racing television channel owned by MEC and distributed by various cable and satellite carriers, including the DISH Network, to over 11 million homes in the U.S. The agreement also includes in-stadium signage at the track level as well as grandstand visibility and announcements. "The horse racing industry has made giant strides in the past few years thanks to excellent promotional and marketing efforts as well as a handful of high-profile, compelling storylines," said Tom Reynolds, Vice-President of Foodservice Sales of Pepsi-Cola North America.
    [Show full text]
  • DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP ANNUAL REPORT DPS at a Glance
    DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP ANNUAL REPORT DPS at a Glance NORTH AMERICA’S LEADING FLAVORED BEVERAGE COMPANY More than 50 brands of juices, teas and carbonated soft drinks with a heritage of more than 200 years NINE OF OUR 12 LEADING BRANDS ARE NO. 1 IN THEIR FLAVOR CATEGORIES Named Company of the Year in 2010 by Beverage World magazine CEO LARRY D. YOUNG NAMED 2010 BEVERAGE EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR BY BEVERAGE INDUSTRY MAGAZINE OUR VISION: Be the Best Beverage Business in the Americas STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE PRIMARY SOURCES & USES OF CASH VS. S&P 500 TWO-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL ’09–’10 JAN ’10 MAR JUN SEP DEC ’10 $3.4B $3.3B 40% DPS Pepsi/Coke 30% Share Repurchases S&P Licensing Agreements 20% Dividends Net Repayment 10% of Credit Facility Operations & Notes 0% Capital Spending -10% SOURCES USES 2010 FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT (MILLIONS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE) CONTENTS 2010 $5,636 NET SALES +2% 2009 $5,531 $ 1, 3 21 SEGMENT +1% Letter to Stockholders 1 OPERATING PROFIT $ 1, 310 Build Our Brands 4 $2.40 DILUTED EARNINGS +22% PER SHARE* $1.97 Grow Per Caps 7 Rapid Continuous Improvement 10 *2010 diluted earnings per share (EPS) excludes a loss on early extinguishment of debt and certain tax-related items, which totaled Innovation Spotlight 23 cents per share. 2009 diluted EPS excludes a net gain on certain 12 distribution agreement changes and tax-related items, which totaled 20 cents per share. See page 13 for a detailed reconciliation of the Stockholder Information 12 7 excluded items and the rationale for the exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri R Coffee & Vending Product List
    Tri R Coffee & Vending Product List Cold Beverages Pepsi Snapple Juice Snapple Diet Pepsi Max Snapple Tea Snapple Lemon Pepsi Natural Dasani Water Snapple Pink Lemonade Pepsi One SoBe Energize Mango Melon Lipton Brisk Strawberry Melon Pepsi Throwback SoBe Energize Power Fruit Punch Lipton Brisk Sugar Free Lemonade Caffeine Free Pepsi SoBe Lean Fuji Apple Cranberry Lipton Brisk Sugar Free Orangeade Diet Pepsi SoBe Lean Honey Green Tea Lipton Brisk Sweet Iced Tea Diet Pepsi Lime SoBe Lean Raspberry Lemonade Lipton Diet Green Tea with Citrus Diet Pepsi Vanilla SoBe Lifewater Acai Fruit Punch Lipton Diet Green Tea with Mixed Berry Diet Pepsi Wild Cherry SoBe Lifewater Agave Lemonade Lipton Diet Iced Tea with Lemon Caffeine Free Diet Pepsi SoBe Lifewater B-Energy Black Cherry Dragonfruit Lipton Diet White Tea with Raspberry Sierra Mist Natural SoBe Lifewater B-Energy Strawberry Apricot Lipton Green Tea with Citrus Diet Sierra Mist SoBe Lifewater Black and Blue Berry Lipton Iced Tea Lemonade Sierra Mist Cranberry Splash SoBe Lifewater Blackberry Grape Lipton Iced Tea with Lemon Diet Sierra Mist Cranberry Splash SoBe Lifewater Cherimoya Punch Lipton PureLeaf - Diet Lemon Diet Sierra Mist Ruby Splash SoBe Lifewater Fuji Apple Pear Lipton PureLeaf - Extra Sweet Ocean Spray Apple Juice SoBe Lifewater Macintosh Apple Cherry Lipton PureLeaf - Green Tea with Honey Ocean Spray Blueberry Juice Cocktail SoBe Lifewater Mango Melon Lipton PureLeaf - Lemon Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Cocktail SoBe Lifewater Orange Tangerine Lipton PureLeaf - Peach Ocean
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 795 795 Complaint IN THE MA TIER OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY FINAL ORDER, OPINION, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT AND SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 9207. Complaint, July 15, 1986--Final Order, June 13, 1994 This final order requires Coca-Cola, for ten years, to obtain Commission approval before acquiring any part of the stock or interest in any company that manufactures or sells branded concentrate, syrup, or carbonated soft drinks in the United States. Appearances For the Commission: Joseph S. Brownman, Ronald Rowe, Mary Lou Steptoe and Steven J. Rurka. For the respondent: Gordon Spivack and Wendy Addiss, Coudert Brothers, New York, N.Y. 798 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Initial Decision 117F.T.C. INITIAL DECISION BY LEWIS F. PARKER, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE NOVEMBER 30, 1990 I. INTRODUCTION The Commission's complaint in this case issued on July 15, 1986 and it charged that The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola") had entered into an agreement to purchase 100 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of DP Holdings, Inc. ("DP Holdings") which, in tum, owned all of the shares of capital stock of Dr Pepper Company ("Dr Pepper"). The complaint alleged that Coca-Cola and Dr Pepper were direct competitors in the carbonated soft drink industry and that the effect of the acquisition, if consummated, may be substantially to lessen competition in relevant product markets in relevant sections of the country in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]