DISULFOTON Appendix H. ECOTOX Bibliography
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DISULFOTON Appendix H. ECOTOX Bibliography Explanation of OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data Studies located and coded into ECOTOX must meet acceptability criteria, as established in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Studies that do not meet these criteria are designated in the bibliography as “Accepted for ECOTOX but not OPP.” The intent of the acceptability criteria is to ensure data quality and verifiability. The criteria parallel criteria used in evaluating registrant-submitted studies. Specific criteria are listed below, along with the corresponding rejection code. · The paper does not report toxicology information for a chemical of concern to OPP; (Rejection Code: NO COC) · The article is not published in English language; (Rejection Code: NO FOREIGN) · The study is not presented as a full article. Abstracts will not be considered; (Rejection Code: NO ABSTRACT) · The paper is not publicly available document; (Rejection Code: NO NOT PUBLIC (typically not used, as any paper acquired from the ECOTOX holding or through the literature search is considered public) · The paper is not the primary source of the data; (Rejection Code: NO REVIEW) · The paper does not report that treatment(s) were compared to an acceptable control; (Rejection Code: NO CONTROL) · The paper does not report an explicit duration of exposure; (Rejection Code: NO DURATION) · The paper does not report a concurrent environmental chemical concentration/dose or application rate; (Rejection Code: NO CONC) · The paper does not report the location of the study (e.g., laboratory vs. field); (Rejection Code: NO LOCATION) · The paper does not report a biological effect on live, whole organisms; (Rejection Code: NO IN-VITRO) · The paper does not report the species that was tested; and this species can be verified in a reliable source; (Rejection Code: NO SPECIES) · The paper does not report effects associated with exposure to a single chemical. (Rejection Code: NO MIXTURE). It should be noted that all papers including data on pesticide mixtures are considered. Additionally, efficacy studies on target species are excluded and coded as NO TARGET. Data that originated from the OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database is coded as NO EFED. These data are already available to the chemical team. Acceptable for ECOTOX and OPP 1. Abdellatif, M. A. and Reynolds, H. T. (1967). Toxic Effects of Granulated Disulfoton on Soil Arthropods. J.Econ.Entomol. 60: 281-283. EcoReference No.: 63523 Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET(DS). 2. Abdul Kareem, A., Jayaraj, S., Thangavel, P., and Parameswaran, S. (1977). Occurrence of the Tobacco Root Bug Stibaropus tabulatus Schio (Cynidae: Hemiptera) on Cotton and Its Control. Pesticides 11: 50 51. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 3. Abdul Wajid, S. M. and Elias, N. A. (1978). Effect of Nematicides on the Control of Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in Tobacco Nurseries. Tob.Res. 4: 7-9. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 4. Abo-Elghar, M. R., Radwan, H. S. A., and El-Keie, I. A. (1977). Field Application of Soil Granular Insecticides for the Control of the Cotton Leafworm in Egypt. Acta Agron.Acad.Sci.Hung. 26: 144-151. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 5. Abraham, E. V., Natarajan, K., and Jayaraj, S. (1977). Investigations on the Insecticidal Control of the Phyllody Disease of Sesamum. Madras Agric.J. 64: 379-383. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 6. Abraham, V. A., Sathiamma, B., Abraham, K. J., and Kurian, Chandy (1976). Control of Arecanut Spindle Bud (Carvalhoia arecae Miller and China) Using Granular Insecticides. J.Plantation Crops 4: 24-25. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 7. Adlerz, W. C. (1969). Insecticidal Control of Leaf Miner on Watermelon in South Florida. In: Proc.Fla.State Hortic.Soc. 81: 176-180. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 8. Ahuja, S. (1982). Chemical Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Nursery Beds of Tomato and Eggplant and Its Effect on Yield in the Field. Trop.Pest Manag. 28: 313-315. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 9. Akram, M. and Yunus, M. (1973). Chemical Control of Leafhoppers Attacking Maize. J.Agric.Res.(Lahore) 10: 239-245. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 10. Al-Aazwi, A. F. (1966). Seed Treatment with Phorate, Disulfoton, and Other Insecticides to Control Pea Insects in Iraq. J.Econ.Entomol. 59: 859-64. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 11. Alagianagalingam, M. N., Mohan, R., Bhaskaran, R., and Govindaswamy, C. V. (1979). Effect of Granular Insecticides on Chilli Mosaic Disease. Food Farm.Agric. 10: 309-310. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 12. Alam, M. M. (1990). Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes with Organic Amendments and Nematocides in Nurseries of Annual Plants. J.Bangladesh Acad.Sci. 14: 107-113. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 13. Alleyne, E. H. and Morrison, F. O. (1977). The Effects of Insecticides on the Lettuce Root Aphid, Pemphigus bursarius (L.). Ann.Soc.Entomol.Quebec 22: 36-39. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 14. Alyokhin, A., Dively, G., Patterson, M., Mahoney, M., Rogers, D., and Wollam, J. (2006). Susceptibility of Imidacloprid-Resistant Colorado Potato Beetles to Non-neonicotinoid Insecticides in the Laboratory and Field Trials. Am.J.Potato Res. 83: 485-494. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 15. Anderson, T. D. and Zhu, K. Y. (2004). Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects of Atrazine on the Toxicity of Organophosphorodithioate and Organophosphorothioate Insecticides to Chironomus tentans (Diptera: Chironomidae). Pestic.Biochem.Physiol. 80: 54-64. EcoReference No.: 74947 Chemical of Concern: DMT,DS,DEM,ATZ,PPB,OMT; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR,BCM; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(ATZ,PPB,DMT,OMT,DS). 16. Anonymous (2006). Insecticidal Combinations Containing Alkoxylated Amines. Res.Disclosure 501: 18-19. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 17. Appleby, J. E. (1967). Control of the Iris Borer with Systemic Insecticides. J.Econ.Entomol. 60: 1610-1612. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 18. Araya, J. E. and Cambron, S. E. (1992). Control of Aphids on Spring Oats and Winter Wheat with Slow Release Granular Systemic Insecticides. Gt.Lakes Entomol. 25: 223-236. EcoReference No.: 90297 Chemical of Concern: ACP,CBF,DS; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP,MOR,PHY; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(DS),OK(ACP,CBF). 19. Araya, J. E., Foster, J. E., and Roberts, J. J. (1988). Effect of Seed Treatments with Systemic Insecticides on Germination of Selected Wheat and Oat Cultivars. Turrialba 38: 246-249. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: EFFICACY (DS). 20. Archer, T. L. and Bynum, E. D. (1978). Pesticide Resistance by Arthropod Pests on Feed Grains. Southwest.Entomol. 3 : 251-259. Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (DS). 21. Arle, H. F. (1968). Trifluralin-Systemic Insecticide Interactions on Seedling Cotton. Weed Sci. 16: 430-432. EcoReference No.: 96629 Chemical of Concern: PRT,TFN,DS; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: GRO; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(DS,PRT). 22. Armstrong, J. S., Peairs, F. B., Pilcher, S. D., and Russell, C. C. (1993). The Effect of Planting Time Insecticides and Liquid Fertilizer on the Russian Wheat Aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) and the Lesion Nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) on Winter Wheat. J.Kans.Entomol.Soc. 66: 69-74. Chemical of Concern: CBF,DS; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: TARGET (CBF,DS). 23. Arnold, H. and Braunbeck, T. (1994). Disulfoton as a Major Toxicant in the Rhine Chemical Spill at Basle in 1986: Acute and Chronic Studies with Eel and Rainbow Trout. In: R.Muller and R.Lloyd (Eds.), Sublethal and Chronic Effects of Pollutants on Freshwater Fish, Chapter 7, Fishing News Books, London 75-87. EcoReference No.: 18516 Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR,CEL,BCM; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(DS). Study provided more sensitive endpoint than was used in the CRLF risk assessment. Study reported an LC50 of 37 ug/L, which is equivalent to the lowest fish LC50 of 39 ug/L (bluegill) that was used in the risk assessment. The study used flow-through conditions. Basic water chemistry parameters were reported. Negative controls were used. However, the LC50 was reported without any other dose-response information. It was not reported if any control eels died. Use of 37 ug/L in place of the LC50 of 39 ug/L would have no impact on the conclusions of the study. 24. Arnold, H., Pluta, H. J., and Braunbeck, T. (1996). Sublethal Effects of Prolonged Exposure to Disulfoton in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Cytological Alterations in the Liver by a Potent . Ecotoxicol.Environ.Saf. 34: 43-55. EcoReference No.: 17425 Chemical of Concern: DS; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: BCM,CEL; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(DS). Study provided more sensitive endpoint than was used in the CRLF risk assessment. Study endpoints included cytologic effects on the liver. The magnitude of the effect observed in the study has not been shown to affect the assessment endpoints of survival, growth, or reproduction. 25. Atkins, E. L. and Kellum, D. (1986). Comparative Morphogenic and Toxicity Studies on the Effect of Pesticides on Honeybee Brood. J.Apic.Res. 25: 242-255 . EcoReference No.: 70351 Chemical of Concern: AND,DZ,Naled,MVP,MLN,BMY,DS,CYT,DMT,FNV,PPG,PMR,OXD,FTT,MOM,EN,ES,CPY,ACP ,MP,CBL,Captan; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: MOR,GRO,PHY; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(DS,Naled,MLN,DMT,MP,FNV,CPY),OK(DZ,PMR,OXD,MOM,ACP,CBL,Captan).