DOCSLIB.ORG

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Romantic Liberalism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Romantic Liberalism UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Romantic Liberalism DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in English by Brent Lewis Russo Dissertation Committee: Professor Jerome Christensen, Chair Professor Andrea Henderson Associate Professor Irene Tucker 2014 Chapter 1 © 2013 Trustees of Boston University All other materials © 2014 Brent Lewis Russo TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii CURRICULUM VITAE iv ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION v INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Charles Lamb’s Beloved Liberalism: Eccentricity in the Familiar Essays 9 CHAPTER 2: Liberalism as Plenitude: The Symbolic Leigh Hunt 33 CHAPTER 3: Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s Illiberalism and the Early Reform Movement 58 CHAPTER 4: William Hazlitt’s Fatalism 84 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Charles Rzepka and the Trustees of Boston University for permission to include Chapter One of my dissertation, which was originally published in Studies in Romanticism (Fall 2013). Financial support was provided by the University of California, Irvine Department of English, School of Humanities, and Graduate Division. iii CURRICULUM VITAE Brent Lewis Russo 2005 B.A. in English Pepperdine University 2007 M.A. in English University of California, Irvine 2014 Ph.D. in English with Graduate Emphasis in Critical Theory University of California, Irvine PUBLICATIONS “Charles Lamb’s Beloved Liberalism: Eccentricity in the Familiar Essays.” Studies in Romanticism. Fall 2013. iv ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Romantic Liberalism By Brent Lewis Russo Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Irvine, 2014 Professor Jerome Christensen, Chair This dissertation examines the Romantic beginnings of nineteenth-century British liberalism. It argues that Romantic authors both helped to shape and attempted to resist liberalism while its politics were still inchoate. By shifting the question of Romantic politics away from the traditional radical/revolutionary and conservative/loyalist binary forward into the more ambiguous realm of early liberalism, the dissertation develops new readings of both first- and second-generation Romantic authors, including Charles Lamb, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Leigh Hunt, and William Hazlitt. v INTRODUCTION This is a collection of essays on a group of later Romantic writers who either harnessed or wrestled with nascent liberalism in the early nineteenth century. Liberalism was not, by then, a defined concept, so the writers were responding to a tendency more than a concrete, named program. Part of the interest of this study, then, lies in the insight it gives into the prehistory of liberalism’s formation. Liberalism was developed and critiqued differently by those for whom it was on its way than it would be by those for whom it had already arrived. Nineteenth-century liberalism can be defined in at least three ways: as an ideology, as a method of governance, and as a mode of subjectivity. As ideology, according to Immanuel Wallerstein, liberalism represents one of three competing ways—and ultimately the triumphant one—of responding to the “new political reality” in post-Napoleonic Europe, that “political change had become normal.” Perceived as norm rather than as aberration or crisis, change became the focus of political thought. Substantively, the most important variable, according to Wallerstein, was the fate of “popular sovereignty.”1 Conservatism developed as an ideology, or “political metastrategy,” first, to discount the radical, democratic aspirations of the French Revolution.2 It counseled gradualism and subtlety and decried revolutionary methods as misguided abominations. Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France provided the touchstone British example. Subsequently liberalism availed itself of the antinomy between revolutionary and conservative logic: “its destiny was to assert that it was located in the center,” however abstract or “rhetorical” such a domain was. Under the auspices, first, of “reformism,” liberalism positioned itself as a sensitive, intelligent 1 Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789-1914 (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2011), 1. 2 Ibid., 1-2. 1 moderator between conservatism and radicalism. It advocated neither slow nor sudden, but timely, guided change, for it believed that, “in order for history to follow its natural course, it was necessary to engage in conscious, continual, intelligent reformism.”3 Liberal politics emerged neither as a defender nor as a skeptic of history, but more charismatically, as an engineer of time, ready to steer history on its progressive course. Rather than rejecting popular sovereignty or embracing it, liberals promised to prepare the way for it by using political power to secure and ensure the proper conditions for popular citizenship. Thus the paradox that liberal ideology insists on both liberty and strong government: Liberalism has always been in the end the ideology of the strong state in the sheep’s clothing of individualism; or to be more precise, the ideology of the strong state as the only sure ultimate guarantor of individualism. Of course, if one defines individualism as egoism and reform as altruism, then the two thrusts are indeed incompatible. But if one defines individualism as maximizing the ability of individuals to achieve self-defined ends, and reform as creating the social conditions within which the strong can temper the discontent of the weak and simultaneously take advantage of the reality that the strong find it easier than the weak to realize their wills, then no inherent incompatibility exists.4 It would not be until 1848 that a new dialectic would produce a third ideology, namely socialism, which would call for accelerated change, and emphasize society as a whole over the individual as the true incarnation of the “sovereignty of the people.”5 Besides as an ideology, liberalism can also be studied as a method of governance. Compared to Wallerstein’s intellectual, dialectical, Germanic account, Jonathan Parry’s work is 3 Ibid., 6. 4 Ibid., 10. 5 Ibid., 13. 2 more English, empiricist, and historiographic—amassing facts, tracking individual changes in liberal politics over time. Although acknowledging the in some ways inherently incoherent nature of liberalism, Parry nevertheless, and in spite of his empiricist methodology, identifies unifying features of liberal leadership in the Victorian period. In particular, he observes that a commitment to disinterestedness informed parliamentary liberalism: Liberals saw government as a matter of integrating and harmonising different classes and interest groups within the political nation. To them, good government involved guiding the people so as to strengthen their attachment to the state and to the firm, fair rule of law, and using policy to shape individual character constructively. … If nineteenth-century Liberalism meant anything, it meant a political system in which a large number of potentially incompatible interests – whether nationalities, classes, or sects – were mature enough to accept an over- arching code of law which guaranteed each a wide variety of liberties.6 This method of governance corresponded, naturally enough, to a distinctively liberal paradigm of subjectivity. Elaine Hadley’s work, employing a more skeptical methodology in the French tradition (Hadley credits Jacques Ranciere in particular as an inspiration), identifies the formal— and thus in some sense paradoxically constraining—features of “liberal cognition” in the period of liberalism’s political ascendancy: “a wide range of strikingly formalized mental attitudes, what the Victorians might call ‘frames of mind,’ such as disinterestedness, objectivity, reticence, conviction, impersonality, and sincerity, all of which carried with them a moral valence.”7 So- 6 Jonathan Parry, The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 3. 7 Elaine Hadley, Living Liberalism: Practical Citizenship in Mid-Victorian Britain (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010), 9. 3 called liberal individuality, according to Hadley, in fact entailed disciplined, willful abstraction from concrete particularities of locality, embodiment, class, and so on: In place of the brutal social body, riven by violent divisions of interest; in place of a vulgar, classed body, burdened by impulses and habits; even in place of the physical body, determined by its biology, mid-Victorian liberalism offers the promise of abstracted individuality, which emancipates the subject from these diverse formulations of bodiliness and their constitutive social spaces through its twin practices of privatization and abstraction.8 Hadley’s study attests to the profound success of the liberal methods of government that Parry’s history recounts. Likewise, her work shows how the liberal ideology of ambiguous progress that Wallerstein highlights also manifest itself at the formal, individual level in the liberal subject’s self-abstraction from time: The individual’s ability to think abstractly in the present and thus to simultaneously be in the moment but think outside it, marked his eligibility for other sorts of abstractions (for instance, the voter in an election, the citizen of the nation), but also, oddly, made him an individual, immune from conventional and majoritarian assumptions.9 So described, Victorian liberal subjectivity seems to have an obvious ancestor in the Romantic imagination, with its well-known,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Realism About Constitutional Liberalism Toni M
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 2012 Some Realism About Constitutional Liberalism Toni M. Massaro Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Massaro, Toni M., "Some Realism About Constitutional Liberalism" (2012). Constitutional Commentary. 1099. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/1099 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Symposium Ordered Liberty: Three Views and a Response SOME REALISM ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERALISM] ORDERED LIBERTY: RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND VIRTUES. James E. Fleming2 and Linda C. McClain. 3 Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 2013. Pp. 371. $49.95 (Cloth). Toni M. Massaro 4 I. INTRODUCTION Presidential elections often are good barometers of the national mood, though their fullest implications are likely best read in hindsight rather than on the eve of the primaries. Nevertheless, a fair reading of the 2012 national mood, as of this pre-election day writing, is that the American people are divided between a vision of government as ally versus government as antagonist. On the partisan poles are those who may be described as strongly and consistently pro-government in their leanings, on the one end, and those who are strongly and consistently libertarian, on the other end. Although most Americans likely lie in between these statism poles, and selectively invoke the benefits or harms of government power, broad-strokes political rhetoric today increasingly rings 1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PROSE STYLE of CHARLES LAMB. the Ohio State University
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-4958 REECER, George Clay, 1934- THE PROSE STYLE OF CHARLES LAMB. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1968 Language and Literature, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE PROSE STYLE OP Oi ARIES LAMB DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of ftiilosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By George Clay Reecer, A.B., M.A, # -a- * -a -a The Ohio State University 1968 Approved by (i . Adviser Department of English VITA February 18, 1934 Born - Glasgow, Kentucky 1956 . • • A.B., Western Kentucky State College 1959-1961 . • Teaching A s s is ta n t, Depart meat of English, Temple University, Phila­ delphia, Pennsylvania 1961 . • • . M.A., Temple University 1961-1962 . • • Instructor, Temple University 1962-1963 . • • Mershon National Graduate Fellowship, The Ohio S ta te U n iv ersity , Columbus, Ohio 1964-1968 . • • Instructor, American International College, Springfield, Massachusetts FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Englieh Wordsworth Professor James V. Logan Studies in Bomantic Poetry and Poetics. Professor James V. Logan Studies in Nineteenth Century Literature. Professor Bioha rd D. A ltio k i i TAELS OF CONTESTS 2*6® INTRODUCTION......................................... ....................................... 1 Chapter I. D IC T IO N ........................................................................... 13 I I . SYNTAX ................. 61 III. STRUCTURE.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society Free
    FREE THE LIBERAL IMAGINATION: ESSAYS ON LITERATURE AND SOCIETY PDF Lionel Trilling,Louis Menand | 336 pages | 23 Oct 2008 | The New York Review of Books, Inc | 9781590172834 | English | New York, United States The Liberal Imagination - Wikipedia The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society is a collection of sixteen essays by American literary critic Lionel Trillingpublished by Viking in The book was edited by Pascal Covici, who had worked with Trilling when he edited and introduced Viking's Portable Matthew Arnold in The essays, then, represent Trilling's written work and critical thoughts of the s. In the essays, Trilling explores the theme of what he calls "liberalism" by looking closely at the relationship between literature, culture, mind, and the imagination. He offers passionate critiques against literary ideas of reality as material and physical, such as those he ascribes to V. ParringtonTheodore Dreiserand the writers of the Kinsey Reports. He supports writers who engage in "moral realism" through an engaged imagination and a "power of love," which he sees expressed in works by Henry JamesMark TwainTacitusF. Scott Fitzgeraldand William Wordsworth —and in the ideas of human nature in the works of Sigmund Freud. Blackmore, Norman Podhoretzand Delmore Schwartzrepresent the importance of this book to the "Intellectuals. Trilling argues that because his contemporary America is predominantly tending to an intellectually liberal tradition, the lack of a robust conservative intellectual tradition causes the lack of a cultural dialectic, making liberal ideas also weak. Trilling confronts the influence of literary critic V. Trilling argues that Parrington believed in a reality that is "immutable; it is wholly external, it is irreducible," and that Parrington believed the job of a literary writer to be the transmission of this reality by loyal reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Lionel Trilling's Existential State
    Lionel Trilling’s Existential State Michael Szalay Death is like justice is supposed to be. Ralph Ellison, Three Days Before the Shooting IN 1952, LIONEL TRILLING ANNOUNCED THAT “intellect has associated itself with power, per- haps as never before in history, and is now conceded to be in itself a kind of power.” He was de- scribing what would be his own associations: his personal papers are littered with missives from the stars of postwar politics. Senator James L. Buckley admires his contribution to American let- ters. Jacob J. Javits does the same. Daniel Patrick Moynihan praises him as “the nation’s leading literary critic.” First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy writes from the White House, thanking him for the collection of D. H. Lawrence stories and hoping to see him again soon. Three years later, President Lyndon Johnson sends a telegram asking Trilling to represent him at the funeral of T. S. Eliot. Politicians liked having Trilling around. He confirmed their noble sense of mission as often as they praised him.1 Trilling’s accommodating relation to power alienated many of his peers, like Irving Howe and C. Wright Mills, and later provoked condemnations from historians like Christopher Lasch and MICHAEL SZALAY teaches American literature and culture at UC, Irvine, and is the author of New Deal Modernism and The Hip Figure, forthcoming from Stanford University Press. He is co-editor of Stanford’s “Post*45” Book Series. 1 Trilling thought that the political establishment embraced intellectuals because it was “uneasy with itself” and eager “to apologize for its existence by a show of taste and sensitivity.” Trilling, “The Situation of the American Intellectual at the Present Time,” in The Moral Obligation to Be Intelligent, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • 'What Is Life?' Mathelinda Nabugodi Antae, Vol. 3, No. 2. (Oct., 2016)
    148 166 Answering the Question: ‘What is Life?’ Mathelinda Nabugodi antae, Vol. 3, No. 2. (Oct., 2016), 149-166 Proposed Creative Commons Copyright Notices Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. b. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). antae is an international refereed postgraduate journal aimed at exploring current issues and debates within English Studies, with a particular interest in literature, criticism and their various contemporary interfaces. Set up in 2013 by postgraduate students in the Department of English at the University of Malta, it welcomes submissions situated across the interdisciplinary spaces provided by diverse forms and expressions within narrative, poetry, theatre, literary theory, cultural criticism, media studies, digital cultures, philosophy and language studies. Creative writing and book reviews are also accepted. Nabugodi, ‘Answering the Question: “What is Life”’ 149 Answering the Question: ‘What is Life?’ Mathelinda Nabugodi University College London Percy Bysshe Shelley’s final poem, ‘The Triumph of Life’—cut short by Shelley’s death by drowning on the 8th of July 1822—offers a series of dream visions in which life’s triumphal procession appears.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study Between John Stuart Mill and John Rawls
    American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) 2021 American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) e-ISSN :2378-703X Volume-5, Issue-5, pp-347-356 www.ajhssr.com Research Paper Open Access The Individual and the Society: A Comparative Study between John Stuart Mill and John Rawls Roger MONDOUE1, JUMBAM Gideon2 1(Department of Philosophy, Psychology, Sociology, Professor-University ofDschang, Cameroon) 2(Department of Philosophy, Psychology, Sociology, Doctorate-University ofDschang, Cameroon) ABSTRACT:This research paper seeks to examine the nature of the relationship that exists between John Stuart Mill and John Rawls‟s conceptions of the individual and the society, given that the need for comparing and contrasting their views is of major necessity in the field of philosophy of humanity and persons. Haven acknowledged the fact that both thinkers are being situated within the liberal tradition, we intend to argue that they all have incompatible and compatible conceptions to the question of the individual/society relationship. This will be in opposition to those who only perceive their views in regard to the reflection of individual and the collective from an exclusive or from an inclusive perspective. Mill accords more powers to the individual above the society while Rawls on his own path reconsidered the balance between the two. However, beyond their opposing dimensions, we shall argue that Rawls remains Millian despite his claimed to have rupture from Mill liberalism of autonomy and individuality. Finally we shall equally propose an alternative that goes beyond their liberal ambitions and that can serve as the base for overcoming the tension between the individual and the society in our present liberal and neoliberal context.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handlist to the Charles Lamb Society Collection at Guildhall Library
    A Handlist to the Charles Lamb Society Collection at Guildhall Library A Handlist to the Charles Lamb Society Collection at Guildhall Library DEBORAH K. HEDGECOCK THE CHARLES LAMB SOCIETY 1995 A Handlist to the Charles Lamb Society Collection at Guildhall Library Copyright Deborah Hedgecock 1995 All rights reserved The Charles Lamb Society 1a Royston Road Richmond Surrey TW10 6LT Registered Charity number 803222: a company limited by guarantee ISSN 0308-0951 Printed by the Stanhope Press, London NW5 (071 387 0041) A Handlist to the Charles Lamb Society Collection at Guildhall Library Contents Preface and Acknowledgements 4 Abbreviations 4 Information on Guildhall Library 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Printed Books 6 2.1 Access conditions 6 2.2 Charles Lamb Society Collection: Printed Books 7 2.2.1 The CLS Pamphlet and Large Pamphlet Collection 8 2.2.2 The CLS Lecture Collection 8 2.2.3 Charles Lamb Society Publications 8 2.2.3.1 Charles Lamb Bulletins 8 2.2.3.2 Indexes to Bulletin 9 2.2.3.3 List of supplements to Bulletin 9 2.2.3.4 Charles Lamb Society Annual Reports and Financial Statements 9 3. Manuscripts 9 3.1 Access conditions 9 3.2.1 18th- and 19th-century autograph letters and manuscripts 10 3.2.2 Facsimiles and reproductions of Lamb's letters 18 3.2.3 20th-century Individuals and Collections 20 3.2.4 The Elian (Society) 25 3.2.5 The Charles Lamb Society Archive 26 4. Prints, Maps and drawings 35 4.1 Access Conditions 35 4.2.1 Framed Pictures 36 4.2.2 Pictures and Ephemera Collection 37 4.2.3 Collections of Pictures 58 4.2.4 Ephemera Cuttings Collection 59 4.2.5 Maps 61 4.2.6 Printing Blocks 61 4.2.7 Glass Slides 61 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature, Emotions, and the Possible: Hazlitt and Stendhal
    Literature, Emotions, and the Possible: Hazlitt and Stendhal “A possible experience or a possible truth does not equate to real experience or real truth minus the value ’real’; but at least in the opinion of its devotees, it has in it something out-and- out divine, a fiery, soaring quality, a constructive will, a conscious utopianism that does not shrink from reality but treats it, on the contrary, as a mission and an invention.” (Robert Musil, The Man without Qualities) Since the 1970s, literary criticism has been dominated first by formalist and then by cultural studies approaches with a general attitude of contempt for science, reason, and the truth. Paradoxically, in the last decades, literary critics have avoided confronting what is fundamental in literature: its intrinsic value as literature, and its ability to represent and express human psychology. The ethical and the aesthetic dimensions of literary forms have been neglected in favour of a sometimes vague sociological vision and a repetitive Freudian- Lacanian interpretation; they reduce the immense variety of affective phenomena to a few complexes (Oedipus, castration) or to an empty linguistic game. Fortunately, for the sake of literature, since the 1980s, some analytical philosophers have been interested in the affective dimension, and have been reflecting on the emotions elicited by the arts and on the knowledge value of literature. As evident nowadays, several disciplines are undergoing what can be called the affective turn, and a new vision of literary and artistic phenomena, revisiting some questions debated since Aristotle and very important in the eighteenth century, is shattering the structuralist, poststructuralist, deconstructionist, and postmodern spell.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: 'The Radical Ladder'
    Notes Introduction: ‘The Radical Ladder’ 1. The Loyalist; or, Anti- Radical; Consisting of Three Departments: Satyrical, Miscellaneous, and Historical (W. Wright, 1820), iv. 2. Here, it might also mean (if the artist is being subversive), ‘I Have Suffered’, which Caroline and the radicals certainly had; or, it might stand for ‘In hoc signo vinces’ – ‘with this as your standard you shall have vic- tory’, hinting at the odd relationship between this Queen and republican radicals. 3. See Thompson, The Making, 691–6. 4. See Robert Reid, The Peterloo Massacre (Heinemann, 1989), 117–19. 5. Frederick Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as Symbolically Social Act (London: Routledge, 2002), ix. 6. Jameson, The Political Unconscious, 1. 7. Clifford Siskin, The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700–1830, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), 2. 8. Frank Kermode, The Romantic Image (London: Fontana Press, 1971), 18–19. 9. Anne Janowitz, ‘“A voice from across the Sea”,: Communitarianism at the Limits of Romanticism’, At the Limits of Romanticism: Essays in Cultural, Feminist and Materialist Criticism, ed. Mary A. Favret and Nicola J. Watson (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994), 85. 10. Nigel Leask and Phillip Connell (eds.), Romanticism and Popular Culture in Britain and Ireland, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 7. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 141. 12. Donald Read, Peterloo: the ‘Massacre’ and its Background (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1958), 16. Interestingly, in a letter to The Times newspaper on 26 September 2008 Read wrote: ‘The crowd was certainly gathered to demand democratic reform, but it was in a fes- tive mood.
    [Show full text]
  • A Postliberal Future?
    A POSTLIBERAL FUTURE? By David Goodhart 1 INTRODUCTION Britain is a good country. One of the best places in the world to live. But it also, of course, has many failings. Some of these are deeply embedded in our history and institutions. Others are of more recent parentage and easier—or at least possible—to rectify through political action. In this essay I want to argue that this task of changing the country for the better would be made easier if a certain cluster of ideas—what is sometimes called postliberalism—held greater sway in the political nation. The word/phrase is a clunky one and there may be better alternatives: ‘one nation liberalism’ is one candidate or, more polemically, ‘liberalism for actually existing people’. But postliberalism seeks to acknowledge the achievements and ascendancy of liberalism in recent decades while also capturing a sense of moving beyond it, of maturing into something more robust that can address concerns that are neglected by, indeed sometimes exacerbated by, mainstream liberalism. Postliberalism is not a policy or political programme, it is more like an ideology or worldview—it tells a story about what Britain looks like today, where it has gone wrong and the attitudes, assumptions and principles that should guide reformers. It also has a view of human nature that aims to capture people in their messy reality rather than reduce them to a single, dominant drive such as self-interest or a desire for autonomy. People are competitive and co-operative, selfish and altruistic. They are in the main neither strivers nor shirkers and generally flourish in secure, settled lives surrounded by love and recognition and with useful, purposeful activity to occupy them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Works of Charles Lamb
    DATE DUE Cornell University Library yysj The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924064980240 Edition de Luxe The Life and Works of Charles Lamb IN TWELVE VOLUMES VOLUME X The Letters OF Charles Lamb Newly Arranged, with Additions EDITED, WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY ALFRED AINGER VOLUME II LONDON MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited 1900 All rights reserved This Edition consists of Six Hundred and Seventy-five Copies s 1 CONTENTS CHAPTER II—(Continued) 1800—1809 LETTERS TO COLERIDGE, MANNING, AND OTHERS PAGE LXXX. To Thomas Manning Dec. 13, 1800 i LXXXI. To William Godwin Dec. 14, 1800 4 LXXXII. To Thomas Manning Dec. 16, 1800 6 LXXXIII. „ „ Dec. 27, 1800 9 LXXXIV. To Samuel Taylor Coleridge [No date—end of 1800] 12 LXXXV. To William Words- worth . Jan. 30, 1801 17 LXXXVI. „ „ Jan. 1801 19 LXXXVII. To Robert Lloyd . Feb. 7, 1801 22 LXXXVIII. To Thomas Manning Feb. 15, 180 25 LXXXIX. „ „ [Feb. or Mar. J 1801 30 L. X V b 1 LETTERS OF CHARLES LAMB LETTIR DATE PAGE XC. To Robert Lloyd . April 6, i8or 34 XCI. To Thomas Manning April 1801 38 XCII. To Robert Lloyd , April 1801 40 XCin. To William Godwin June 29, 1801 42 XCIV. To Robert Lloyd . July 26, 1801 43 XCV. To Mr. Walter Wilson Aug. 14, 1801 46 XCVL To Thomas Manning [Aug.] 1801 47 XCVIL „ „ Aug. 31, 1 80 49 XCVin. To William Godwin Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hazlitt Review
    THE HAZLITT REVIEW The Hazlitt Review is an annual peer-reviewed journal, the first internationally to be devoted to Hazlitt studies. The Review aims to promote and maintain Hazlitt’s standing, both in the academy and to a wider readership, by providing a forum for new writing on Hazlitt, by established scholars as well as more recent entrants in the field. Editor Uttara Natarajan Assistant Editors Helen Hodgson, Phillip Hunnekuhl Editorial Board Geoffrey Bindman James Mulvihill David Bromwich Tom Paulin Jon Cook Seamus Perry Gregory Dart Michael Simpson Philip Davis Fiona Stafford A.C. Grayling Graeme Stones Paul Hamilton John Whale Ian Mayes Duncan Wu Tim Milnes Scholarly essays (4000–7000 words) and reviews should follow the MHRA style. The Board is also happy to consider more informal submissions from Hazlitt’s lay readership. Email [email protected] or post to Uttara Natarajan, c/o Department of English & Comparative Literature, Goldsmiths College, New Cross, London SE14 6NW. We regret that we cannot publish material already published or submitted elsewhere. Subscriptions, including membership of the Hazlitt Society: £10 (individual); £15 (corporate). Overseas subscriptions: $24 (individual) or $35 (corporate). Cheques/postal orders, made payable to the Hazlitt Society, to be sent to Helen Hodgson, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9AG Enquiries to [email protected] or by post to Helen Hodgson. www.williamhazlitt.org ISSN 1757-8299 Published 2012 by The Hazlitt Society c/o Dept of English & Comparative
    [Show full text]