Francesco MGG Final
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Victor Coelho, "Francesco da Milano," in Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1999-), English translation Francesco Canova da Milano (Francesco training other than Gaurico’s unverified claim Milanese; Francesco da Parigi; Monzino) that he studied with Giovanni Angelo Born Monza, 18 August 1497, died 2 January Testagrossa, the lute teacher to Isabella 1543. “Il Divino,” as he was known during his d’Este. lifetime—a title otherwise bestowed only The bulk of Francesco’s professional upon Michelangelo—Francesco da Milano life was spent in Rome, where he served, with was the most important and influential various interruptions, from 1514 to 1539 in lutenist of the Italian Renaissance. He the successive papal households of Leo X flourished during a period when most Italian Medici, Adrian VI Dedal , Clement VII courts were dominated by oltremontani, and can Medici, and Paul III Farnese. Francesco began thus be considered as the first Italian-born his papal service early on in Leo’s pontificate, musician of the Renaissance to achieve and remained as one of the pope’s private international fame. His compositions musicians (sometimes listed along with his circulated widely and with regularity in father) until the end of the papacy in 1521. Europe, through single-author prints, large Continuing his employment into the ill-fated retrospective anthologies, and manuscripts; pontificate of Clement VII, Francesco they continue to appear in English and performed before such figures as Castiglione Continental sources until the middle of the and Giovio in 1524, and Isabella d’Este in seventeenth century, his works achieving a 1526. He returned to Milan shortly before the “classic” status at a time when dramatic Sack of Rome, becoming a canon in S. changes in musical style and modifications to Nazaro Maggiore in 1528. A period of the instrument itself rendered most of the residence in Piacenza is intimated in a verse sixteenth-century lute repertory obsolete. by the Florentine poet Francesco Berni from 1528, in which the poet calls on Francesco to Life and Patronage: The earliest information leave Piacenza and join his forlorn admirers in about Francesco’s life comes from the Venice. Neither this trip nor Fétis’s claim that horoscopes prepared by Girolamo Cardano Francesco served as organist at the Duomo of (1543) and Luca Gaurico (1552), which laid Milan around 1530 has been confirmed (see the groundwork for the pioneering studies by Slim, 1964). A sojourn in Paris is also a Slim (1964, 1965) and the more recent possibility given the attribution of some of his archival work by Pavan (1991, 1995, 1997). works in the Siena Lute Book (NL - DHgm 28 Francesco was born into a musical family in B 39) to a “Francesco da Parigi,” and the fact Monza, one of three sons fathered by that Francesco’s first published work (a Benedetto Canova (the name of Francesco’s corrupt reading of his Fantasia 24) appeared mother is not known), a clever entrepreneur in a Parisian source licensed by the royal who invested in property, founded a company court, Attaingnant’s Tres breve et familiere that produced gold and silver thread, and introduction of 1529. capitalized on his son’s distinguished musical Upon his return to Rome around career to further his family’s economic and 1531, Francesco entered the service first of social status (Pavan, 1994). No details have Cardinal Ippolito de’Medici, and after 1534, yet emerged about Francesco’s musical that of Pope Paul III, where his duties 2 Victor Coelho, "Francesco da Milano," in Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1999-), English translation included teaching lute to the pope’s grandson Maria della Scala in Milan, a church long since Ottavio Farnese. Francesco’s most famous replaced by the famous opera house of the student, however, was Perino Fiorentino degli same name. Many attempts have been made Organi (1523-52), a Florentine lute virtuoso in to identify Francesco in sixteenth-century his own right who became a member of Paul paintings of lutenists. But it is a seventeenth- III’s household at the age of thirteen and century portrait copy in the Biblioteca whose works were later published alongside Ambrosiana in Milan, portraying a bearded his teacher’s. In 1536, three books devoted “Francesco del liuto” with a music book in exclusively to Francesco’s compositions were front of him open to a page from Arcadelt’s published in Naples and Venice, by Sultzbach madrigal Quand’io penso al martire (a work that and Marcolini, respectively, as well as an was, in fact, intabulated by Francesco), that is important Milanese lute anthology by recognized as the only true likeness of the Casteliono that contained five of Francesco’s lutenist. pieces along with selections by Albert de Rippe, Marco dall’Aquila, and Pietro Paolo Sources, Style, and Reputation: Of the Borrono. A fifth book from that year (Brown, approximately 125 compositions that are 154?/4) that is devoid of both a publisher’s assumed to be by Francesco, less than half of name and date, is identical to the Marcolini them were published during his lifetime, and volume and predates it; Pavan’s elaborate many new and unique works attributed to him hypothesis about its political background is continued to appear almost fifty years after his inconclusive; see Pavan, 2000.) Some of death. Not surprisingly, the Francesco Francesco’s travels as a member of the papal catalogue as it stands now reveals a stylistic musica during this second Roman sojourn have and technical inconsistency that cries out for been documented: in 1533 he accompanied serious analytical scrutiny, a topic that Clement VII to Bologna for his meeting with Francesco scholars have shown a puzzling Charles V; and in 1538 Francesco was the reluctance to broach. It is fairly clear that only musician brought to Nice by Paul III for many attributions to Francesco cannot be his meeting with Charles V and Francis I. accepted uncritically, and in seeking to Thus, Francesco’s music was requested at ascertain what exactly Francesco did and did functions in which diplomatic honor was at not write, recent studies have confronted this stake, suggesting a connection among papal issue from a range of musicological taste, ceremony, and compositional style (see perspectives, including 1) how the economics Coelho, 2002). In 1538 Francesco appears as and occasional unscrupulousness of print one of the “gentilhomini e camerieri” of culture might influence attribution; 2) how the Cardinal Alessandro Farnese (Dorez, 1932), veracity of manuscript attributions can be and he is also documented back in Milan judged on stylistic grounds; and 3) through an following his marriage to the noble Milanese examination of the broad patterns of Chiara Tizzoni in the same year. We know reception and revival that shaped Francesco’s little either of Francesco’s activities after this posthumous reputation (see Coelho, 1996). time, or of the cause and place of his death. A Francesco’s publications of 1536 show tombstone was erected by his father at Santa a dramatic evolution from the more rhapsodic 3 Victor Coelho, "Francesco da Milano," in Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1999-), English translation and formulaic styles contained in the Petrucci generation prior to Francesco, but it reflects a lute books of 1507-1508, revealing instead a composer who was probably in Rome around new contrapuntal artistry that is derived from 1495—just before Francesco’s birth—and his adaptation of polyphonic vocal techniques whose music remained in the chapel to the lute. It is logical to assume that the repertory, reflecting the antiquarian taste of music in these prints (and possibly later ones, the papal chapel that persists through the first too) had their compositional origins during half of the sixteenth century. As for the more the composer’s service to the Medici popes in numerous secular settings, Francesco’s prefer- the 1510s, ‘20s and ‘30s, and, by extension, ence for the French chanson as a model for fundamentally conceived within, and intabulation provides the clearest example of informed by, the literary and humanistic the noble Florentine taste that was adopted in culture around Leo X and Clement VII (see Rome during Medici papacies (see Coelho, Coelho, 2005). His fantasias and ricercars 2002). Many of these chansons were copied draw on traditional lute idioms, to be sure, but into Florentine manuscripts during this his main influences are the formal, motivic, period, or they represent composers whose and contrapuntal features of the frottola (as works were known by the Medici, such as seen in Ricercar 2—numberings refer to Ness, Févin and, of course, Richafort, whose music 1970), motet (Fantasia 21), French chanson was sung in the papal court and who received (Ricercar 3, 16), and the new Italian madrigal a benefice from Pope Leo X in 1516. (Ricercar 6), which Francesco amalgamated Due to the exclusive ten-year privilege into a broad-based instrumental style. Some granted to Marcolini to print lute tablatures in works even contain programmatic elements 1536, which he did not exercise again prior to similar to the Parisian chanson—the climax of its expiration, the publication of Francesco’s trumpet calls at the end of Fantasia 1, for lute music did not resume until 1546, three example. Many if not most of his fantasias are years after the composer’s death. The based on subjects borrowed from vocal music Venetian prints of that year introduce mostly (see Mengozzi, 1990), similar to the way a new intabulations, all of them chansons, based Bembo text was indebted to Petrarch. One on models by Garnier, Sermisy, Certon, can say that Francesco helped develop the Layolle, Gombert and Janequin, including a fantasia from a purely preludial genre of brilliant arrangement of the latter’s famous music to an artistic creation that is informed by Chant des oyseaux.