Perceptions of Cholera in Nineteenth-Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perceptions of Cholera in Nineteenth-Century “The Just Wrath of Heaven”: Perceptions of Cholera in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia Marina Gonzalez A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in History, University Honors Professor Mary Frances Giandrea, Faculty Advisor, History American University, Spring 2012 Gonzalez 1 “The Just Wrath of Heaven”: Perceptions of Cholera in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia This study investigates the 1832 cholera epidemic and how it was perceived in the city of Philadelphia. I examine the ways in which contemporary medical and popular discourse on the nature of cholera served to enforce social power structures that marginalized the poor, ethnic and racial minorities, and women. Because cholera was a disease few Americans had encountered before 1832, little was understood about its causes or manner of transmission. As a result, medical authorities, city officials, and the public attempted to make sense of cholera by creating a narrative to explain its origin, spread, and effects. The way cholera was represented by the people of Philadelphia exposes cultural beliefs and biases of the time, as well as power relations, reflected by the groups that were determined to have introduced cholera to the city and the kinds of people who were believed to harbor the disease. I use contemporary newspapers, medical texts, sermons, and other documents to determine these how these beliefs evolved during the 1832 epidemic and in the surrounding years. Most theories portrayed cholera as a disease of the dissolute, dirty, and immoral, blaming members of society’s lowest rungs for the spread of the disease. Using the language of individual responsibility, popular media shifted the blame away from the larger structural factors that led to poverty and unsanitary urban conditions, preserving the status quo. Introduction In 1832, Americans waited in fearful anticipation as news of cholera poured in from European cities. Prior to the 1820s, cholera had existed as an endemic disease in India, but the globalization of commerce allowed it to spread through Russia, Eastern and Western Europe, and eventually the Americas by the early 1830s. Cholera seemed unstoppable; it passed through the heavily-guarded cordon sanitaire separating Western Europe from Russia and the strict quarantines of the European ports, leaving a trail of death in its wake. While it was not the greatest killer of the period, the speed and violence with which it killed made it extremely frightening.1 A seemingly healthy person could be seized without notice in the middle of an afternoon walk and be dead by night time.2 Additionally, there was little medical knowledge available to explain how cholera spread or how to cure it. As a result, people had to come up with their own explanations for how the disease behaved. Epidemic diseases like cholera 1 Erin O’Connor, Raw Material: Producing Pathology in Victorian Culture (London: Duke University Press, 2000), 32 2 Charles E Rosenberg, The Cholera Years (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 3. Gonzalez 2 function as good markers of social beliefs because they disrupt everyday life and require a society to come up with accounts that make sense of the chaos.3 In order to make cholera logical, it was essential to assign it a narrative to explain its birth, spread, and effects. Part of the narrative-making process involved the creation and dissemination of medical knowledge on the disease. While these actions may seem value-free, both medical ‘fact’ and public opinion on cholera were molded by the cultural beliefs of American society at the time. Because of the lack of factual knowledge concerning cholera, physicians and the general public interpreted the disease through the lens of the dominant ideologies of the nineteenth century, which shaped the beliefs people held about what cholera was, where and how it originated, and how it was transmitted. These beliefs determined municipal policy intended to combat the spread of cholera, with a concrete effect on people who were considered threats to public health. Therefore it is essential to examine the accepted ideologies in American society in the period leading up to the first cholera epidemic in order to understand how cultural prejudices shaped the public’s beliefs about cholera and how these beliefs upheld dominant power structures. For much of the nineteenth century, American beliefs were based on middle class Protestant moral codes. These codes included negative conceptions of poverty as well as prejudice against African Americans, immigrants, and prostitutes, all of which helped to shape the views that public officials, medical authorities, and the public in general held about cholera. By blaming stigmatized groups for the introduction and spread of cholera, members of more privileged groups were able to reassure themselves that they were in no danger as long as they complied with moral codes. 3 Philip Alcabes, Dread: How Fear and Fantasy Have Fueled Epidemics from the Black Death to Avian Flu (New York: PublicAffairs, 2009), 5. Gonzalez 3 In essence, my research question is: how did the beliefs that medical authorities and the public in general held about the poor, immigrants, African Americans, and prostitutes influence their conceptions of cholera, and what effect did this have on public health policy? The Cholera Context Cholera is caused by the Vibrio cholerae bacterium, which is transmitted in humans via the ingestion of food or water contaminated with infected excretions. Infection is most common in countries with poor sanitation systems, because in these places the contaminated substances are more easily able to enter waterways and drinking water supplies. While a majority of people who are exposed to the bacterium remain asymptomatic, the disease has debilitating consequences on those it does affect.4 The cholera bacteria infest the person’s digestive system and give off a toxin that disrupts the normal transport of water and salt in the lumen of the small intestine.5 This is the section of the intestine through which food passes so that nutrients and water may be absorbed, and the disruption caused by the cholera toxin wreaks havoc on the absorption process. The toxin reverses the absorption process, causing the cells lining the intestine to pull water from body tissue and eject it into the lumen, from which it is excreted with great force.6 The massive quantity of watery diarrhea produced combines with near-constant vomiting to dehydrate the patient to fatal levels within a few hours. If left untreated, death occurs in about fifty percent of cases.7 The treatment for cholera, however, is relatively simple and highly effective. Antibiotics may be administered, but oral rehydration therapy is equally 4 Aaron A. King, Edward L. Ionides, Mercedes Pascual, and Menno J. Bouma, “Inapparent Infections and Cholera Dynamics,” Nature 454 (14 August 2008): 877. 5 Alcabes, Dread, 57. 6 Alcabes, Dread, 57. 7 Alcabes, Dread, 57. Gonzalez 4 successful. This method was officially developed in the 1960s, but simple forms of it existed as early as the 1820s.8 Cholera originated in the Indian subcontinent, circulating there for centuries as what was likely a mild form in equilibrium with the human population.9 The entrance of the British into India, with the resulting increase in population density and introduction of faster means of transportation, created an environment that allowed the disease to spread and become more virulent. The first colony-wide outbreak began simultaneously in Jessore and other cities of the Bengal province in 1817.10 From there, cholera followed British troops and trade routes to reach Asia and the Middle East by the mid-1820s. It traveled with the Russian army from Turkey to Moscow in 1829 and then to Poland the following year.11 From Russia and Poland, cholera made its first trip into Western Europe, reaching the United States by 1832. In total three epidemics would reach Philadelphia: one in 1832, a second in 1849, and the last in 1866. Cholera passed through Philadelphia several times between these three epidemic years but did not cause the same level of devastation on those trips. In each case, cholera first visited Europe and then struck the United States in the summer of the following year. As a result, Philadelphians could read about cholera’s path of destruction for months before the disease crossed the Atlantic. The early notice allowed the city to make preparations in order to reduce the number of cases, such as setting up quarantines, performing street cleaning, and establishing temporary hospitals. Physicians used the grace period to communicate with their peers in cholera-stricken countries and to come up with new explanations and cures for the disease. The educated public participated in the medical debate to a large degree, consuming news and writing in to 8 Alcabes, Dread, 58. 9 Alcabes, Dread, 59. 10 The Cholera Gazette (Philadelphia: Carey, Lea, & Blanchard, 1832), 17. 11 Alcabes, Dread, 59. Gonzalez 5 newspapers themselves. Specialized cholera-themed papers, such as Philadelphia’s Cholera Gazette, were printed in several cities throughout 1832 and could barely print enough issues to fulfill public demand.12 . Physicians endlessly debated cholera’s means of transmission and whether it was a contagious or non-contagious disease. At this time, doctors accepted that some diseases, like smallpox, could be communicated between people. Supporters of the contagion model for cholera argued that the disease
Recommended publications
  • Hamilton's Forgotten Epidemics
    Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Ch2olera: Hamilton’s Forgotten Epidemics / D. Ann Herring and Heather T. Battles, editors. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-9782417-4-2 Print catalogue data is available from Library and Archives Canada, at www.collectionscanada.gc.ca Cover Image: Historical City of Hamilton. Published by Rice & Duncan in 1859, drawn by G. Rice. http://map.hamilton.ca/old hamilton.jpg Cover Design: Robert Huang Group Photo: Temara Brown Ch2olera Hamilton’s Forgotten Epidemics D. Ann Herring and Heather T. Battles, editors DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY McMASTER UNIVERSITY Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Contents FIGURES AND TABLES vii Introduction Ch2olera: Hamilton’s Forgotten Epidemics D. Ann Herring and Heather T. Battles 2 2 “From Time Immemorial”: British Imperialism and Cholera in India Diedre Beintema 8 3 Miasma Theory and Medical Paradigms: Shift Happens? Ayla Mykytey 18 4 ‘A Rose by Any Other Name’: Types of Cholera in the 19th Century Thomas Siek 24 5 Doesn’t Anyone Care About the Children? Katlyn Ferrusi 32 6 Changing Waves: The Epidemics of 1832 and 1854 Brianna K. Johns 42 7 Charcoal, Lard, and Maple Sugar: Treating Cholera in the 19th Century S. Lawrence-Nametka 52 iii 8 How Disease Instills Fear into a Population Jacqueline Le 62 9 The Blame Game Andrew Turner 72 10 Virulence Victims in Victorian Hamilton Jodi E. Smillie 80 11 On the Edge of Death: Cholera’s Impact on Surrounding Towns and Hamlets Mackenzie Armstrong 90 12 Avoid Cholera: Practice Cleanliness and Temperance Karolina Grzeszczuk 100 13 New Rules to Battle the Cholera Outbreak Alexandra Saly 108 14 Sanitation in Early Hamilton Nathan G.
    [Show full text]
  • Miasma Vs Germ Theory Nina Kokayeff College of Dupage
    ESSAI Volume 10 Article 24 4-1-2012 Dying to be Discovered: Miasma vs Germ Theory Nina Kokayeff College of DuPage Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai Recommended Citation Kokayeff, Nina (2013) "Dying to be Discovered: Miasma vs Germ Theory," ESSAI: Vol. 10, Article 24. Available at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol10/iss1/24 This Selection is brought to you for free and open access by the College Publications at [email protected].. It has been accepted for inclusion in ESSAI by an authorized administrator of [email protected].. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kokayeff: Dying to be Discovered: Miasma vs Germ Theory Dying to be Discovered: Miasma vs Germ Theory by Nina Kokayeff (Chemistry 1551) n 1832, Mozart‘s librettist Lorenzo da Ponte arranged for the visit of an Italian opera troupe to cholera-stricken Manhattan. They arrived to find the streets empty and silent except for ―I the ringing of church bells and the rattle of carts taking corpses to graveyards. Every resident who could had fled…‖ (Karlen, 1995). The cholera outbreak across many countries in the 19th century was the last of the great pandemics in which the miasma theory about the origin of disease was considered. New practices were developed to reduce the spread of the disease and a new picture of disease transmission emerged. The efficacy of these measures inspired other countries to follow suit, and soon encouraged some of the most groundbreaking biomedical research in history. Miasma Theory of disease contagion was popular for centuries in Western cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • V Sir Ronald Ross and the Significance of His Work
    V SIR RONALD ROSS AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HIS WORK T WAS my pleasure in January, 1927, to be present at the I unveiling of a bronze tablet on a gateway in front of the Presidency General Hospital in Calcutta, leading to the un- pretentious little brick building in the hospital compound which Sir Ronald Ross used as a laboratory twenty-nine years earlier. That spot deserves to rank among the first in the world in historic interest, yet I had lived in Calcutta for almost three years and had passed that very gateway hun- dreds of times, without knowing of its existence. In an ad- dress made at the time, Colonel Megaw, then Director of the School of Tropical Medicine in Calcutta, remarked that it was astonishing that so few of the inhabitants of Calcutta knew of the existence of the little laboratory where one of the greatest discoveries in the history of the world was made. He added that although over twenty-eight years had passed, we had only begun to scratch the surface of the vast mine of wealth which that discovery had placed in our hands. “A prophet,” said Col. Megaw, “is not without honor save in his own country. Sir Ronald’s offense did not consist merely in being a prophet; he added to it by being a poet and a scientist, and so trebly earned the indifference with which his great work was received in India.” This same Sir Ronald Ross, at the age of seventy-five, died at his modest home in Putney, England, barely six months ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagar-XIX.Pdf
    Editorial Board Ishan Chakrabarti – Co-Editor-in-Chief, The University of Texas at Austin Matthew D. Milligan – Co-Editor-in-Chief, The University of Texas at Austin Dan Rudmann – Co-Editor-in-Chief, The University of Texas at Austin Kaitlin Althen – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Reed Burman – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Christian Current – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Cary Curtis – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Christopher Holland – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Priya Nelson – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Natasha Raheja – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Keely Sutton – Editor, The University of Texas at Austin Faculty Advisor Syed Akbar Hyder, Department of Asian Studies Editorial Advisory Board Richard Barnett, The University of Virginia Manu Bhagavan, Hunter College-CUNY Nandi Bhatia, The University of Western Ontario Purnima Bose, Indiana University Raza Mir, Monmouth University Gyan Prakash, Princeton University Paula Richman, Oberlin College Eleanor Zelliot, Carleton College The University of Texas Editorial Advisory Board Kamran Ali, Department of Anthropology James Brow, Department of Anthropology Barbara Harlow, Department of English Janice Leoshko, Department of Art and Art History W. Roger Louis, Department of History Gail Minault, Department of History Veena Naregal, Department of Radio-Television-Film Sharmila Rudrappa, Department of Sociology Martha Selby, Department of Asian Studies Kamala Visweswaran, Department of Anthropology SAGAR A SOUTH ASIA GRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNAL Sponsored by South Asia Institute Itty Abraham, Director The University of Texas at Austin Volume 19, Spring 2010 Sagar is published biannually in the fall and spring of each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Medicine and Imperial Authority in JG Farrell's the Siege
    J Med Humanit DOI 10.1007/s10912-014-9313-5 ‘AGreatBeneficialDisease’: Colonial Medicine and Imperial Authority in J.G. Farrell’s The Siege of Krishnapur Sam Goodman # The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract This article examines J. G. Farrell’s depictions of colonial medicine as a means of analysing the historical reception of the further past and argues that the end-of-Empire context of the 1970s in which Farrell was writing informed his reappraisal of Imperial authority with particular regard to the limits of medical knowledge and treatment. The article illustrates how in The Siege of Krishnapur (1973), Farrell repeatedly sought to challenge the authority of medical and colonial history by making direct use of period material in the construction of his fictional narrative; by using these sources with deliberate critical intent, Farrell directly engages with the received historical narrative of colonial India, that the British presence brought progress and development, particularly in matters relating to medicine and health. To support these assertions the paper examines how Farrell employed primary sources and period medical practices such as the nineteenth-century debate between miasma and water- borne Cholera transmission and the popularity of phrenology within his novels in order to cast doubt over and interrogate the British right to rule. Overall the paper will argue that Farrell’s critique of colonial medical practices, apparently based on science and reason, was shaped by the political context of the 1970s and used to question the wider moral position of Empire throughout his fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Medicine Medical Renaissance
    Medieval England 1250-1500 1500-1700 Medical 18th and 19th Century Religion not Science Renaissance Britain Supernatural Ideas Enquiring Attitudes Science and Tech God sends disease as a punishment Continuity: Supernatural explanations - God Continuity: Although the same rational The position of the planets had an impact and Planets - became less popular. Rational explanations for disease were around the Theory on health explanations were more favoured - New - of the Four Humours had much less support. Rational Explanations diagnosis using urine analysis. Miasma and ‘Spontaneous Generation’ blamed for i)The Theory of the Four Humours - an New Scientific Approach disease by most doctors. imbalance in either blood, phlegm, black i) English doctor - Thomas Sydenham - Major Turning Point Alert!!!! bile, yellow bile causes illness encourages a return to diagnosis based on i)In 1861 Louis Pasteur of France proved the the 2) Miasma - (Bad smells) observation - not all illnesses are the same - microbes (germs) were the cause not the result of An invisible poisonous gas emerges rest and good food better than decay and disease - killing off 4 Humours, the wherever there is foul smelling waste and bleeding/purging Miasma theory and the theory Spontaneous this gas causes illness, especially ii) King Charles II sets up the Royal Society in Generation. contagious illness like the plague. London to encourage doctors to look for a ii)Surgeon Joseph Lister used Pasteur’s knowledge more scientific cause of illness and to try The continuing influence of Galen and to greatly reduced the rate of post-surgical experimenting with new techniques infection by using carbolic bandages and sprays to Hippocrates: iii) The invention of the printing press in the keep the surgery sterile.
    [Show full text]
  • Sawbones 275: the First Pharmacist Published on May 18Th, 2019 Listen Here on Themcelroy.Family
    Sawbones 275: The First Pharmacist Published on May 18th, 2019 Listen here on themcelroy.family Clint: Sawbones is a show about medical history, and nothing the hosts say should be taken as medical advice or opinion. It's for fun. Can't you just have fun for an hour, and not try to diagnose your mystery boil? We think you've earned it. Just sit back, relax, and enjoy a moment of distraction from that weird growth. You're worth it. [theme music plays] [applause] Justin: Hello, everybody, and welcome to Sawbones, a marital tour of misguided medicine. I'm your cohost, Justin McElroy. [audience cheers] Sydnee: And I'm Sydnee McElroy. [audience cheers] Justin: Yes. Yes. We all know. We have something more important to discuss. My brother, not three minutes ago... Sydnee: [laughs] Justin: Let me take you back. Sydnee: We were right there. We saw the whole thing from right there. Justin: Wait. We saw the whole thing. Let me back up. Today, my family went to The Ruby Slipper Cafe. [audience cheers] Justin: I did not. I went and took my daughter, my baby, back for a nap. Because I'm a hero. I ate a lamp-heated sandwich that I bought at a store. That's not important. I come downstairs and I ask— we're going to the aquarium. I don't want to. But we have to, because we go to the aquarium every time. Because we have— Sydnee: We go anywhere. Not 'cause it's not great. He was just [whispers] kind of tired.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Nursing Practices Used in the Management of Infection in Hospitals, 1929- 1948
    A Study of Nursing Practices Used in the Management of Infection in Hospitals, 1929- 1948 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences 2014 David Justham School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work 2 LIST OF CONTENTS Page List of Contents 2 Abstract 6 Declaration 7 Copyright Statement 8 List of Abbreviations 9 Acknowledgements 10 Preface 11 Chapter 1 Introduction and Method 12 1.1 The Context of the Study 12 1.2 Rationale for the Study 14 1.3 Research Question 20 1.4 Methods Used and Methodological Considerations 21 1.4.1 Oral History Method 22 1.4.2 Oral History and Memory 25 1.4.3 Sampling Strategy 30 1.4.4 Ethical Considerations 32 1.4.5 Recording Oral History 33 1.4.6 Transcribing Data 34 1.4.7 Analysis of Oral History Data 38 1.4.8 Archival Research 39 1.4.9 Use of Memoirs 41 1.5 Historiographical Considerations 41 1.5.1 Nursing History as a Separate Field of History 41 1.5.2 The Interpretation of Data to Inform History 43 1.6 Summary of Method 47 1.7 Structure of the Thesis 47 Chapter 2 Underpinning Concepts of Relevance to Infection in the 50 1930s and 1940s 2.1 Introduction 50 3 2.2 Miasma and Germ Theory 50 2.3 Ideas of Sanitation 54 2.4 Removing Dirt 58 2.5 Fear of Infection 61 2.6 Immunology 64 2.7 The Impact of Sulphonamides and Antibiotics 67 2.8 Development of Infection Control 72 2.9 Summary 75 Chapter 3 Issues in the History of Nursing 77 3.1 Introduction 77 3.2 The Hiddenness of Nursing Work 77 3.3 Status Issues in Nursing 82 3.4
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health and Sanitation in Colonial Lahore, 1849-1910 by Maysoon Sheikh a Thesis Presented to the University of Waterloo In
    Public Health and Sanitation in Colonial Lahore, 1849-1910 by Maysoon Sheikh A thesis presented to the University Of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2018 © Maysoon Sheikh 2018 Examining Committee Membership The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. External Examiner Rachel Berger Associate Professor, History Concordia University Supervisor Douglas Peers Professor, History and Dean of Arts University of Waterloo Internal Member Dan Gorman Professor, History University of Waterloo Internal Member Jesse Palsetia Associate Professor, History University of Guelph Internal-external Member Heather Smyth Associate Professor, English Language and Literature University of Waterloo ii Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract The British annexation of the Punjab in 1849 had important consequences for the city of Lahore. Indeed, the British occupation prompted Lahore’s transformation into a “modern” colonial city. New designs for urbanization, environmental reform, and sanitary improvement were implemented by the city’s new administrators, resulting in important changes in Lahore’s physical and social environment. At first, the impulse to redevelop the city stemmed largely from colonial anxieties about threats to the health of the army and Lahore’s British residents; however, by the late nineteenth century, this “enclavist” approach was replaced by a more extensive public health scheme that was geared towards managing and safeguarding the city’s entire population.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicable Diseases and Germ Theory in Colonial India – an Assessment*
    Indian Journal of History of Science, 48.3 (2013) 513-530 COMMUNICABLE DISEASES AND GERM THEORY IN COLONIAL INDIA – AN ASSESSMENT* Srabani Sen** The transition from miasma to germ theory in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century has been widely documented in narratives about the discovery of microbes, the evidence of contamination, or the procedures for sterilizations. This was a radical change in the history of understanding disease, treating and preventing it, and that shift marked a new era in medicine. However, it is important to find out how did that shift happen, what was it actually like to live through the transition while dealing with the disease, contagion, infection, transmission, treatment or prevention? This project was aimed to investigate the establishment of germ theory as the central paradigm in tropical medicine and the impact of germ theory on the indigenous physicians in colonial India. The study consists of the five following chapters: I. The Indo-Portuguese exchange of medical knowledge in colonial Goa. II. Bacteriological Investigations by Europeans in British India. III. The Debates on the Contagion as the origin of diseases. IV. The Impact of Germ Theory of Disease on Indigenous Practitioners. V. Bacteriology in the Service of Communicable diseases in Colonial India. First chapter presents the Indo-Portuguese exchange of medical knowledge in colonial Goa. By 1510 the Portuguese established themselves on the west coast of India with their capital at Goa and became regular visitors to India as traders, soldiers, sailors, adventurers, missionaries, naturalists, physicians and surgeons. Though, all the trading companies sent out physicians and surgeons with their expeditions, they had little experience of tropical diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Miasmic Theory
    A Brief History of Miasmic Theory Carl S. Sterner1 While the idea that bad or corrupt air is the cause of illness and disease dates at least to ancient Greece, the use of the term “miasma” to describe this concept appears to date from the seventeenth or eighteenth centuries. The Ancients: The Origin of the Theory The Encyclopedia of Public Health states that miasmic theory “dates at least from classical Greece in the fourth or fifth century B.C.E.”2 The Greek physician Hippocrates (c. 460- 377 B.C.E.) believed bad air to be the cause of pestilence—or, more accurately, believed bad air was equivalent to pestilence.3 Vitruvius, in his Ten Books on Architecture, warns of the dangers of various kinds of bad air—exhalations from marshes, pestilential air, and unhealthy vapors—but does not use the term “miasma”.4 Greco-Roman physician Galen (c. 130-201 C.E.) expanded upon the theory of bad air, tracing individual susceptibility to the balance of humors in the body.5 This idea was influential during the Middle Ages as an explanation for contagion—why some contracted plague while others did not.6 1 This paper was written in August 2007 in the capacity of a graduate research assistant to Assistant Professor Rebecca Williamson at the University of Cincinnati. 2 Last, John M. 2001. “Miasma Theory.” Encyclopedia of Public Health. Ed. Lester Breslow. New York: Macmillan Reference: 765. 3 Byrne, Joseph P. 2004. The Black Death. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press: 42 4 Vitruvius. 1960. The Ten Books on Architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Defense
    Containment Narratives: Legal and Literary Treatments of Pollution During the Victorian Fin de Siècle Kamila Maria Lis Arlington, Virginia B.A., Harvard University, 2005 M.A., University of Virginia, 2008 J.D., Yale Law School, 2011 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Virginia May, 2014 © 2014 by Kamila Lis All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT “Containment Narratives: Legal and Literary Treatments of Pollution During the Victorian Fin de Siècle” argues that smoke for the late Victorians was a proxy for an unarticulated anxiety about entropic degeneracy; this underlying unease, and not any direct reaction to the phenomenon as it was actually experienced by the senses, was what shaped legal and literary reactions to airborne pollution. In replacing miasma theory, which attributed disease to vapors emanating from discrete and ultimately containable sources of organic decay, the idea of pollution disrupted the longstanding view that airborne waste could be controlled with the suggestion that it was indefatigably expansive. This shift, and the disruption it occasioned, happened at a time rife with such analogous disruptions as advances in industry and biology, as well as the sudden emergence of new areas of inquiry within the social and natural sciences, which collectively destabilized numerous conceptual categories that had previously been relied upon for their immutability. The longing for permanence that resulted surfaced in both legal and literary discussions of smoke as a move toward narrative containment. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to the many whose wise counsel guided me in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]