DOCSLIB.ORG

Supernova Triggers for End-Devonian Extinctions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supernova Triggers for End-Devonian Extinctions Supernova Triggers for End-Devonian Extinctions BRIEF REPORT Brian D. Fieldsa,b,c,1, Adrian L. Melottd, John Ellise,f,g, Adrienne F. Ertela,b, Brian J. Fryh, Bruce S. Liebermani,j, Zhenghai Liua,b, Jesse A. Millera,b, and Brian C. Thomask aIllinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universe; bDepartment of Astronomy, University of Illinois, 1002 W. Green St., Urbana IL 61801, USA; cDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801, USA; dDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS 66045, USA; eDepartment of Physics, Kings College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK; fTheoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland; gLaboratory of High Energy and Computational Physics, National Institute for Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Rävala 10, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia; hPhysics Department, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO 80840, USA; iDepartment of Ecology, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS 66045, USA; jEvolutionary Biology and Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS 66045, USA; kDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Washburn University, Topeka KS 66621, USA This manuscript was compiled on August 26, 2020 .. The Late Devonian was a protracted period of low speciation result- proto-trees, armored fish, trilobites, ammonites, conodonts, ing in biodiversity decline, culminating in extinction events near the chitinozoans and acritarchs, possibly coeval with the Hangen- Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Recent evidence indicates that berg Crisis; this seems to have largely left intact sharks, bony the final extinction event may have coincided with a dramatic drop in fish and tetrapods with five fingers and toes. The fact that stratospheric ozone, possibly due to a global temperature rise. Here these species disappeared over multiple beds indicates that we study an alternative possible cause for the postulated ozone drop: the extinction extended over at least thousands of years. a nearby supernova explosion that could inflict damage by acceler- Refs. (5, 9, 11) also report the discovery of spores from ating cosmic rays that can deliver ionizing radiation for up to ∼ 100 this episode with distinct morphologies including malformed kyr. We therefore propose that the end-Devonian extinctions were spines and dark pigmented walls, features consistent with triggered by supernova explosions at ∼ 20 pc, somewhat beyond severely deteriorating environmental conditions, and UV-B the “kill distance” that would have precipitated a full mass extinction. damage following destruction of the ozone layer (11). How- Such nearby supernovae are likely due to core-collapses of massive ever, more quantitative data are needed to study their varia- stars; these are concentrated in the thin Galactic disk where the Sun tion during quiescent times in the fossil record. resides. Detecting either of the long-lived radioisotopes 146Sm or 244Pu in one or more end-Devonian extinction strata would confirm Heating Mechanism for Ozone Depletion a supernova origin, point to the core-collapse explosion of a mas- sive star, and probe supernova nucleosythesis. Other possible tests Ref. (5) proposes an ozone depletion mechanism involving in- of the supernova hypothesis are discussed. creased water vapor in the lower stratosphere caused by en- hanced convection due to higher surface temperatures. Water Extinction | Supernova | Cosmic rays | Ozone | Isotope geology vapor contributes to a catalytic cycle that converts inorganic chlorine (primarily HCl and ClONO2) to free radical form The late Devonian biodiversity crisis is characterized by a (ClO). The ClO then participates in an ozone-destroying cat- protracted decline in speciation rate occurring over millions alytic cycle. A similar set of cycles involving Br contributes of years (1, 2), punctuated by an extinction pulse (Kellwasser to ozone depletion, but to a lesser extent (12). Increased ClO event) followed ∼ 10 Myr later by a more moderate extinc- and decreased ozone following convective injection of water tion (Hangenberg event) around the Devonian-Carboniferous into the lower stratosphere has been verified by observation boundary (DCB) ∼ 359 Myr ago (3, 4). Marshall et al. (5) and modeling (12, 13). Ref. (5) argues that a period of ex- recently suggested that the Hangenberg event was associated ceptional and sustained warming would lead to the loss of the with ozone depletion (see also (6)), in light of evidence such protective ozone layer via this mechanism. as malformations persisting in palynological assemblages on This mechanism is important for lower stratosphere ozone the order of many thousands of years. Ref. (7) argued that depletion, and may have consequences for ground-level UV-B volcanic eruption and a large igneous province (LIP) triggered exposure (12). More detailed study is warranted. Until then, ozone depletion, whereas (5) instead linked it to an episode it is unclear whether this change would be sufficient to cause arXiv:2007.01887v2 [astro-ph.HE] 25 Aug 2020 of global warming not caused by LIP. an extinction. There are several reasons for this. Previous work has not considered astrophysical sources of First, the vertical extent of this ozone depletion mechanism ionizing radiation, which are known to be possible causes of should be limited to the lower stratosphere (∼ 12 − 18 km ozone depletion and concomitant UV-B increase that could altitude) and does not overlap with the largest concentration trigger elevated extinction levels (see, e.g., (8)), as well as di- of ozone, which occurs around 20-30 km. So, while depletion rect genetic damage. Here we consider whether astrophysical may be significant in the lower stratosphere, the bulk of the sources could account for the data in (5), and whether any ozone layer lies above this region and would not be affected. additional evidence could test for their occurrence. The total column density would be reduced, but not to the extent of a complete loss of the protective ozone layer. The precise patterns prevalent during the DCB are compli- cated by several factors including difficulties in stratigraphic correlation within and between marine and terrestrial settings Author contributions: BDF, JE, and ALM designed the research; BDF, BJF, ZL, and JAM made calculations; ALM, AFE, BSL, and BCT analyzed data; BDF, BJF, JE, BSL, ALM, and BCT wrote and the overall paucity of plant remains (9). However, a the paper. general consensus seems to be emerging that there was first The authors are unaware of any competing interests. a loss of diversity in spores and pollen followed after about 300 kyr (10) by a pulse of extinctions of many plants including 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bdfi[email protected] https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013774117 PNAS | August 26, 2020 | vol.XXX | no.XX | 1–3 Secondly, the duration of the effect should be relatively long-lived nuclear isotopes that could provide distinctive sig- short, . 1 week (12), since the injected water vapor is pho- natures, as we discuss later. tolyzed and ClO is converted back to HCl and ClONO2. Thus, There are two main types of SNe: (1) massive stars > unless convective transport of water vapor to the lower strato- (∼ 8M⊙) that explode as core-collapse SNe (CCSNe), and sphere, e.g., by storms, is continuous (on week timescales) the (2) white dwarfs that accrete from binary companions and ex- ozone reduction will be episodic, not sustained. The effect is plode as Type Ia SNe. These SN types have similar explosion also seasonal, since strongly convective storms tend to be lim- energies, and both produce ionizing radiation able to dam- ited to the spring/summer. While this is likely detrimental age the biosphere. However, their different nucleosynthesis to surface life, most organisms have repair mechanisms that outputs lead to different radioisotope signatures. can cope with some short-duration UV-B exposure. Near-Earth CCSNe are more likely than Type Ia SNe. We Thirdly, the effect is likely to be limited geographically, estimate the nearby CCSN frequency using a Galactic rate −1 since strongly convective storms are not uniformly distributed RCCSN = (30 yr) and placing the Sun at a radius R⊙ = and the enhanced water vapor is likely only to spread over 8.7 kpc in a thin disk of scale radius 2.9 kpc and height 0.1 kpc ∼ −R⊙/R0 3 2 100 km horizontally (12). (23). This gives a CCSN rate RSN = e r /3R0h0 ∼ 3 −1 Finally, there is significant uncertainty as to the ozone de- 4 r20 Gyr within r20 = r/20 pc from Earth. Hence a CCSN pletion level needed to induce aberrations in pollen morphol- at a distance ∼ 2 times the “kill radius” of 10 pc is a plausible ogy and even more critically, large-scale extinction. While origin of the end-Devonian event(s). In contrast, the Type Ia the anthropogenic ozone “hole” over Antarctica has led to SN rate is an order of magnitude smaller, as these events are increased UV-B exposure, no crash in the ecosystem has re- spread over the ∼ 8 times larger volume of the thick disk. sulted. This may partly be due to the seasonal nature of the Massive stars are usually born in clusters (OB associa- change, as would be the case here as well. Recent work (14) tions), and are usually in binaries with other massive stars. has shown that short-term exposure to significant increases Thus, if one CCSN occurred near the DCB, likely there were in UV-B does not result in large negative impacts on the pri- others. This could explain the Kellwasser and other enigmatic mary productivity of ocean phytoplankton, and other organ- Devonian events, in addition to the Hangenberg event. isms show a wide range of sensitivity (15, 16). The amount of column depletion over a given location in those cases was Possible Radioisotope Signatures of Supernovae ∼ 50%. The depletion caused by the mechanism considered in (5) seems unlikely to be that large. Hence, the convective A CCSN close enough to cause a significant extinction would transport of water vapor to the lower stratosphere may not be also deliver SN debris to the Earth as dust grains–micron or sufficient to induce a substantial extinction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    CHAPTER 2 PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE GRAND CANYON PAIGE KERCHER INTRODUCTION The Paleozoic Era of the Phanerozoic Eon is defined as the time between 542 and 251 million years before the present (ICS 2010). The Paleozoic Era began with the evolution of most major animal phyla present today, sparked by the novel adaptation of skeletal hard parts. Organisms continued to diversify throughout the Paleozoic into increasingly adaptive and complex life forms, including the first vertebrates, terrestrial plants and animals, forests and seed plants, reptiles, and flying insects. Vast coal swamps covered much of mid- to low-latitude continental environments in the late Paleozoic as the supercontinent Pangaea began to amalgamate. The hardiest taxa survived the multiple global glaciations and mass extinctions that have come to define major time boundaries of this era. Paleozoic North America existed primarily at mid to low latitudes and experienced multiple major orogenies and continental collisions. For much of the Paleozoic, North America’s southwestern margin ran through Nevada and Arizona – California did not yet exist (Appendix B). The flat-lying Paleozoic rocks of the Grand Canyon, though incomplete, form a record of a continental margin repeatedly inundated and vacated by shallow seas (Appendix A). IMPORTANT STRATIGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS • Principle of Original Horizontality – In most cases, depositional processes produce flat-lying sedimentary layers. Notable exceptions include blanketing ash sheets, and cross-stratification developed on sloped surfaces. • Principle of Superposition – In an undisturbed sequence, older strata lie below younger strata; a package of sedimentary layers youngs upward. • Principle of Lateral Continuity – A layer of sediment extends laterally in all directions until it naturally pinches out or abuts the walls of its confining basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Instability and Tipping Points in the Late Devonian
    Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository – http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ Sarah K. Carmichael, Johnny A. Waters, Cameron J. Batchelor, Drew M. Coleman, Thomas J. Suttner, Erika Kido, L.M. Moore, and Leona Chadimová, (2015) Climate instability and tipping points in the Late Devonian: Detection of the Hangenberg Event in an open oceanic island arc in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Gondwana Research The copy of record is available from Elsevier (18 March 2015), ISSN 1342-937X, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.02.009. Climate instability and tipping points in the Late Devonian: Detection of the Hangenberg Event in an open oceanic island arc in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt Sarah K. Carmichael a,*, Johnny A. Waters a, Cameron J. Batchelor a, Drew M. Coleman b, Thomas J. Suttner c, Erika Kido c, L. McCain Moore a, and Leona Chadimová d Article history: a Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA Received 31 October 2014 b Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Received in revised form 6 Feb 2015 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3315, USA Accepted 13 February 2015 Handling Editor: W.J. Xiao c Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, Institute for Earth Sciences (Geology & Paleontology), Heinrichstrasse 26, A-8010 Graz, Austria Keywords: d Institute of Geology ASCR, v.v.i., Rozvojova 269, 165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic Devonian–Carboniferous Chemostratigraphy Central Asian Orogenic Belt * Corresponding author at: ASU Box 32067, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA. West Junggar Tel.: +1 828 262 8471. E-mail address: [email protected] (S.K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Time Scale Is the Eon
    Exploring Geologic Time Poster Illustrated Teacher's Guide #35-1145 Paper #35-1146 Laminated Background Geologic Time Scale Basics The history of the Earth covers a vast expanse of time, so scientists divide it into smaller sections that are associ- ated with particular events that have occurred in the past.The approximate time range of each time span is shown on the poster.The largest time span of the geologic time scale is the eon. It is an indefinitely long period of time that contains at least two eras. Geologic time is divided into two eons.The more ancient eon is called the Precambrian, and the more recent is the Phanerozoic. Each eon is subdivided into smaller spans called eras.The Precambrian eon is divided from most ancient into the Hadean era, Archean era, and Proterozoic era. See Figure 1. Precambrian Eon Proterozoic Era 2500 - 550 million years ago Archaean Era 3800 - 2500 million years ago Hadean Era 4600 - 3800 million years ago Figure 1. Eras of the Precambrian Eon Single-celled and simple multicelled organisms first developed during the Precambrian eon. There are many fos- sils from this time because the sea-dwelling creatures were trapped in sediments and preserved. The Phanerozoic eon is subdivided into three eras – the Paleozoic era, Mesozoic era, and Cenozoic era. An era is often divided into several smaller time spans called periods. For example, the Paleozoic era is divided into the Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous,and Permian periods. Paleozoic Era Permian Period 300 - 250 million years ago Carboniferous Period 350 - 300 million years ago Devonian Period 400 - 350 million years ago Silurian Period 450 - 400 million years ago Ordovician Period 500 - 450 million years ago Cambrian Period 550 - 500 million years ago Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Devonian and Carboniferous Stratigraphical Correlation and Interpretation in the Central North Sea, Quadrants 25 – 44
    CR/16/032; Final Last modified: 2016/05/29 11:43 Devonian and Carboniferous stratigraphical correlation and interpretation in the Orcadian area, Central North Sea, Quadrants 7 - 22 Energy and Marine Geoscience Programme Commissioned Report CR/16/032 CR/16/032; Final Last modified: 2016/05/29 11:43 CR/16/032; Final Last modified: 2016/05/29 11:43 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ENERGY AND MARINE GEOSCIENCE PROGRAMME COMMERCIAL REPORT CR/16/032 Devonian and Carboniferous stratigraphical correlation and interpretation in the Orcadian area, Central North Sea, Quadrants 7 - 22 K. Whitbread and T. Kearsey The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights Contributor 2016. Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290 EUL. N. Smith Keywords Report; Stratigraphy, Carboniferous, Devonian, Central North Sea. Bibliographical reference WHITBREAD, K AND KEARSEY, T 2016. Devonian and Carboniferous stratigraphical correlation and interpretation in the Orcadian area, Central North Sea, Quadrants 7 - 22. British Geological Survey Commissioned Report, CR/16/032. 74pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico
    Report of Investigations No. 201 Stratigraphic Analysis of the Upper Devonian Woodford Formation, Permian Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico John B. Comer* *Current address Indiana Geological Survey Bloomington, Indiana 47405 1991 Bureau of Economic Geology • W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78713-7508 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................3 Stratigraphy .....................................................................................................................5 Nomenclature ...................................................................................................................5 Age and Correlation ........................................................................................................6 Previous Work .................................................................................................................6 Western Outcrop Belt ......................................................................................................6 Central Texas ...................................................................................................................7 Northeastern Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • Jahrbuch Der Geologischen Bundesanstalt
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt Jahr/Year: 2018 Band/Volume: 158 Autor(en)/Author(s): Schönlaub Hans-Peter Artikel/Article: Review of the Devonian/Carboniferous boundary in the Carnic Alps 29- 47 JAHRBUCH DER GEOLOGISCHEN BUNDESANSTALT Jb. Geol. B.-A. ISSN 0016–7800 Band 158 Heft 1–4 S. 29–47 Wien, Dezember 2018 Review of the Devonian/Carboniferous boundary in the Carnic Alps HANS P. SCHÖNLAUB* 16 Text-Figures Österreichische Karte 1:50.000 Italy BMN / UTM Carnic Alps 197 Kötschach / NL 33-04-09 Oberdrauburg Devonian 197 Kötschach / NL 33-04-10 Kötschach-Mauthen Carboniferous Conodonts Hangenberg Crisis Contents Abstract ................................................................................................ 29 Zusammenfassung ........................................................................................ 30 Current knowledge ........................................................................................ 30 Review of sedimentary and tectonic history ..................................................................... 32 Important stratigraphic markers .............................................................................. 32 Middle and Upper Ordovician ............................................................................. 32 Silurian .............................................................................................. 32 Devonian............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Devonian Fauna of the Ouray Limestone
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR 391 THE DEVONIAN FAUNA OF THE OURAY LIMESTONE BY E. M. KINDLE ' WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction,.............................................................. 5 Nomenclature and stratigraphic relations. ..................................... 6 Comparison of the two faunas in the Ouray limestone........................... 11 Distribution of the fauna..........................................:......... 13 Description of fauna....................................................... 15 Ccelenterata............................................................ 15 Vermes............................................................... 15 Brachipoda........................................................... 15 Pelecypoda........................................................... 30 Gastropoda............................................................ 33 Cephalopoda.......................................................... 36 Index.................................................................... 59 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. Quray fauna. 40 II. Ouray fauna. 42 III. Ouray fauna. 44 IV. Ouray fauna. 46 V. Ouray fauna. 48 VI. Ouray fauna. 50 VII. Ouray fauna. 52 VIII. Ouray fauna. 54 IX. Ouray fauna. 56 X.- Ouray fauna. 58 THE DEVONIAN FAUNA OF THE OURAY LIMESTONE, By E. M. KINDLE. INTRODUCTION. The first discovery of a Devonian fauna in Colorado was made by F. M. Endlich in 1875, during his survey of the San Juan district.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lungfish Survivor of the End-Devonian Extinction and an Early Carboniferous Dipnoan
    1 A Lungfish survivor of the end-Devonian extinction and an Early Carboniferous dipnoan 2 radiation. 3 4 Tom J. Challands1*, Timothy R. Smithson,2 Jennifer A. Clack2, Carys E. Bennett3, John E. A. 5 Marshall4, Sarah M. Wallace-Johnson5, Henrietta Hill2 6 7 1School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh, 8 EH9 3FE, UK. email: [email protected]; tel: +44 (0) 131 650 4849 9 10 2University Museum of Zoology Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. 11 12 3Department of Geology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK. 13 14 4School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, 15 European Way, University Road, Southampton, SO14 3ZH , UK. 16 17 5Sedgwick Museum, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing St., 18 Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK 1 19 Abstract 20 21 Until recently the immediate aftermath of the Hangenberg event of the Famennian Stage (Upper 22 Devonian) was considered to have decimated sarcopterygian groups, including lungfish, with only 23 two taxa, Occludus romeri and Sagenodus spp., being unequivocally recorded from rocks of 24 Tournaisian age (Mississippian, Early Carboniferous). Recent discoveries of numerous 25 morphologically diverse lungfish tooth plates from southern Scotland and northern England indicate 26 that at least ten dipnoan taxa existed during the earliest Carboniferous. Of these taxa, only two, 27 Xylognathus and Ballgadus, preserve cranial and post-cranial skeletal elements that are yet to be 28 described. Here we present a description of the skull of a new genus and species of lungfish, 29 Limanichthys fraseri gen.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2014/02 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
    [Show full text]
  • A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 A Hiatus Obscures the Early Evolution of Modern Lineages of Bony Fishes Romano, Carlo Abstract: About half of all vertebrate species today are ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii), and nearly all of them belong to the Neopterygii (modern ray-fins). The oldest unequivocal neopterygian fossils are known from the Early Triassic. They appear during a time when global fish faunas consisted of mostly cosmopolitan taxa, and contemporary bony fishes belonged mainly to non-neopterygian (“pale- opterygian”) lineages. In the Middle Triassic (Pelsonian substage and later), less than 10 myrs (million years) after the Permian-Triassic boundary mass extinction event (PTBME), neopterygians were already species-rich and trophically diverse, and bony fish faunas were more regionally differentiated compared to the Early Triassic. Still little is known about the early evolution of neopterygians leading up to this first diversity peak. A major factor limiting our understanding of this “Triassic revolution” isaninter- val marked by a very poor fossil record, overlapping with the Spathian (late Olenekian, Early Triassic), Aegean (Early Anisian, Middle Triassic), and Bithynian (early Middle Anisian) substages. Here, I review the fossil record of Early and Middle Triassic marine bony fishes (Actinistia and Actinopterygii) at the substage-level in order to evaluate the impact of this hiatus–named herein the Spathian–Bithynian gap (SBG)–on our understanding of their diversification after the largest mass extinction event of the past. I propose three hypotheses: 1) the SSBE hypothesis, suggesting that most of the Middle Triassic diver- sity appeared in the aftermath of the Smithian-Spathian boundary extinction (SSBE; ฀2 myrs after the PTBME), 2) the Pelsonian explosion hypothesis, which states that most of the Middle Triassic ichthyo- diversity is the result of a radiation event in the Pelsonian, and 3) the gradual replacement hypothesis, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogeographic Maps Earth History
    History of the Earth Age AGE Eon Era Period Period Epoch Stage Paleogeographic Maps Earth History (Ma) Era (Ma) Holocene Neogene Quaternary* Pleistocene Calabrian/Gelasian Piacenzian 2.6 Cenozoic Pliocene Zanclean Paleogene Messinian 5.3 L Tortonian 100 Cretaceous Serravallian Miocene M Langhian E Burdigalian Jurassic Neogene Aquitanian 200 23 L Chattian Triassic Oligocene E Rupelian Permian 34 Early Neogene 300 L Priabonian Bartonian Carboniferous Cenozoic M Eocene Lutetian 400 Phanerozoic Devonian E Ypresian Silurian Paleogene L Thanetian 56 PaleozoicOrdovician Mesozoic Paleocene M Selandian 500 E Danian Cambrian 66 Maastrichtian Ediacaran 600 Campanian Late Santonian 700 Coniacian Turonian Cenomanian Late Cretaceous 100 800 Cryogenian Albian 900 Neoproterozoic Tonian Cretaceous Aptian Early 1000 Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian 1100 Stenian Berriasian 146 Tithonian Early Cretaceous 1200 Late Kimmeridgian Oxfordian 161 Callovian Mesozoic 1300 Ectasian Bathonian Middle Bajocian Aalenian 176 1400 Toarcian Jurassic Mesoproterozoic Early Pliensbachian 1500 Sinemurian Hettangian Calymmian 200 Rhaetian 1600 Proterozoic Norian Late 1700 Statherian Carnian 228 1800 Ladinian Late Triassic Triassic Middle Anisian 1900 245 Olenekian Orosirian Early Induan Changhsingian 251 2000 Lopingian Wuchiapingian 260 Capitanian Guadalupian Wordian/Roadian 2100 271 Kungurian Paleoproterozoic Rhyacian Artinskian 2200 Permian Cisuralian Sakmarian Middle Permian 2300 Asselian 299 Late Gzhelian Kasimovian 2400 Siderian Middle Moscovian Penn- sylvanian Early Bashkirian
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification of Insects Since the Devonian
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Diversifcation of insects since the Devonian: a new approach based on morphological disparity of Received: 18 September 2017 Accepted: 12 February 2018 mouthparts Published: xx xx xxxx Patricia Nel1,2, Sylvain Bertrand2 & André Nel1 The majority of the analyses of the evolutionary history of the megadiverse class Insecta are based on the documented taxonomic palaeobiodiversity. A diferent approach, poorly investigated, is to focus on morphological disparity, linked to changes in the organisms’ functioning. Here we establish a hierarchy of the great geological epochs based on a new method using Wagner parsimony and a ‘presence/ absence of a morphological type of mouthpart of Hexapoda’ dataset. We showed the absence of major rupture in the evolution of the mouthparts, but six epochs during which numerous innovations and few extinctions happened, i.e., Late Carboniferous, Middle and Late Triassic, ‘Callovian-Oxfordian’, ‘Early’ Cretaceous, and ‘Albian-Cenomanian’. The three crises Permian-Triassic, Triassic-Jurassic, and Cretaceous-Cenozoic had no strong, visible impact on mouthparts types. We particularly emphasize the origination of mouthparts linked to nectarivory during the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. We also underline the origination of mouthparts linked to phytophagy during the Middle and the Late Triassic, correlated to the diversifcation of the gymnosperms, especially in relation to the complex ‘fowers’ producing nectar of the Bennettitales and Gnetales. During their ca. 410 Ma history, hexapods have evolved morphologically to adapt in a continuously changing world, thereby resulting in a unique mega-biodiversity1. Age-old questions2–4 about insects’ macroevolution now- adays receive renewed interest thanks to the remarkable recent improvements in data and methods that allow incorporating full data, phylogenomic trees besides fossil record5–9.
    [Show full text]