DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report on the Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Birds in the Region of Kaliakra, Bulgaria (Activity 3)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report on the Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Birds in the Region of Kaliakra, Bulgaria (Activity 3) Final Report on the Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Birds in the Region of Kaliakra, Bulgaria (Activity 3) Author: Mag. Dr. Stefan Schindler Hauptstraße 21/3 3013 Tullnerbach, Austria Requester: Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Water (MOEW) Version: 31.07.2020 Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Birds in the Region of Kaliakra Content 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. History of Kaliakra SPA .................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Status of the territory and the process of establishing IBA .................................................... 4 2.2 List of SPAs in Bulgaria and the place of SAC Kaliakra on the list ............................................ 8 2.3. The process of identifying SPA Kaliakra. ............................................................................... 18 3. Description of relevant terms of the assessment ......................................................................... 22 4. Constructed wind turbines in the region of Kaliakra .................................................................... 26 5. The migration route “Via Pontica” in Bulgaria .............................................................................. 27 6. Methods applied at wind farms in the Kaliakra region ................................................................. 29 7. Implemented Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................... 32 7.1 The collision avoidance system at St Nikola Wind Farm, Kaliakra ........................................ 32 7.2 The Integrated System for Protection of Birds ...................................................................... 33 8 Relevant methods for impact assessment at operating wind farms ............................................ 35 8.1. Collision rates ........................................................................................................................ 35 8.2. Population status and trends ................................................................................................ 36 9. Case examples from other EU member states .............................................................................. 37 9.1. Southern Iberia ...................................................................................................................... 38 9.2. Sicily ....................................................................................................................................... 41 9.3. Baltic Sea ............................................................................................................................... 43 10. Methodology of impact assessment ............................................................................................. 47 11. Consultation results ....................................................................................................................... 51 11.1. Assessment of collision mortality impacts ........................................................................ 51 11.1.1. Kaliakra wind farm ......................................................................................................... 52 11.1.2. Sveti Nikola Wind Farm ................................................................................................. 52 11.1.3. Collision mortality at EVN Wind Farm in autumn 2015 ................................................ 53 11.1.4. Collision mortality: summary ........................................................................................ 54 11.2. Assessment of other impact types .................................................................................... 55 11.2.1. Displacement ................................................................................................................. 55 11.2.1.1. Red-breasted Geese in Kaliakra and neighboring regions ........................................ 55 11.2.1.2. Geese and windfarms: Insights from international studies ...................................... 64 11.2.1.3. Displacement: summary ............................................................................................ 65 11.2.2. Barrier effects ................................................................................................................ 66 1 Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Birds in the Region of Kaliakra 11.2.3. Habitat loss .................................................................................................................... 67 11.3. Comparison oft he wind farms in Kaliakra with other European wind farms ................... 69 12. Recommendations to improve impact monitoring and mitigation .............................................. 71 12.1. Homogeneity of the dataset.............................................................................................. 71 12.2. Spatial range of observations ............................................................................................ 72 12.3. Weather conditions ........................................................................................................... 72 12.4. Overview on field work effort per vantage point .............................................................. 72 12.5. Monitoring of breeding birds ............................................................................................ 72 12.6. Optional efforts for potential target species ..................................................................... 73 12.7. Overview of parameters .................................................................................................... 73 12.8. Transparency, data availability, and stakeholder involvement ......................................... 74 13. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 74 14. References ..................................................................................................................................... 75 ANNEX ................................................................................................................................................... 89 2 Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Birds in the Region of Kaliakra 1. Introduction Climate change and biodiversity loss, if not averted immediately, may inflict severe impacts on ecosystem processes, functions and services that are crucial for human welfare. Increasing renewable energy deployment and expanding the current protected area network represent key solutions to these challenges, but conflicts may arise over the use of limited land for renewable energies as opposed to biodiversity conservation (Pogson et al. 2013; Pouzols et al. 2014; Meller et al. 2015). Development of wind power, one major type of renewable energy, is strongly increasing in Europe and elsewhere (AWEA 2014; EWEA 2015; Wang et al. 2015). Impacts on biodiversity by wind power are strongly contingent on the location of the wind turbines. Consequently, conflicts between nature conservation, local communities and wind energy companies are frequent, in terms of biodiversity conservation, in particular with regard to the impact of wind energy on birds and bats (Loss et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2015). Different kinds of impacts can occur and some of them are difficult to assess, particularly for rare and for endangered species (Stewart et al. 2007; BirdLife International 2013). The lack of comprehensive empirical data and of evidence-based knowledge syntheses of biodiversity impacts and the effectiveness of mitigation measures might hamper the long-term development of the wind power industry by reaffirming negative stereotypes and public opposition (Masden et al. 2010; BirdLife International 2013; May et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2015). The Ministry of Environment and Water commissioned the preparation of a “Full-scale independent impact assessment of the exploitation of wind parks in the region of Kaliakra, pursuant to Recommendation 200 (2018) of the Standing Committee of the Bern Convention”. Herewith, the final report (“Activity 3”) with the results from this analysis, containing an assessment, recommendations, and conclusion is delivered. 2. History of Kaliakra SPA In this section the historical information about the process of determining the Important Bird Area (IBA) and Special Protection Area (SPA) “Kaliakra” is developed. This includes (i) the state of the territory and the process of establishing IBA, (ii) a list of SPAs in Bulgaria and the place of SAC Kaliakra on the list, and (iii) the process of identifying SPA Kaliakra. 3 Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Birds in the Region of Kaliakra 2.1 Status of the territory and the process of establishing IBA The Kaliakra wind farms are situated close to the Black Sea coast in northeastern Bulgaria. According to the databases of the official webpages of the European Union1, the “quality” of IBA Kaliakra is describe as follows: “Kaliakra IBA is the only site in Bulgaria, which keeps the remaining Eastern Dobrudzha steppe, as well as the biggest cliffs along the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. It supports 310 bird species, 71 of which are listed in the Red Data Book for Bulgaria (1985). Of the birds occurring there 106 species are of European conservation concern (SPEC) (BirdLife International,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company
    BULGARIAN PORTS INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY www.bgports.bg BULGARIAN PORTS INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company (BPI Co.) manages the port infrastructure of the public transport ports of national importance and provides traffic management and shipping information services. Head office of the BPI Co. is located in Sofia. BPI Co. has four territorial and three specialized divisions situated in Burgas, Varna, Lom and Ruse. Strategic objective of BPI Co. is to ensure optimum efficiency of port infrastructure and services provided by the company, taking into account the balance of interests in the development of the national port system. BULGARIAN PORTS INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY VTS AUTHORITY - BLACK SEA SPECIAL DIRECTORATE OF BULGARIAN PORTS INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY COVERAGE: SEA PORTS AND TERRITORIAL WATERS Danube River Balchik Varna The operational area of the Directorate covers the sea ports of Republic of Nesebar Black Bulgaria, the territorial and Burgas internal waters. Sea VTS Authority - Black Sea is made responsible for the provision of the full range of Vessel Traffic Services, including the IOS (information Service), TOS (Traffic Organization Service) and NAS (Navigational Assistance service) for the vessel traffic. The Directorate also provides vessel electronic documentation environment, port movements planning and organization and assistance in SAR, MAS and anti-pollution response. BULGARIAN PORTS INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY THE MAIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE RESPONSIBILITY AREA: . Development of Vessel Traffic Management Information System – VTMIS; . Development and providing electronic data exchange environment for the governmental bodies and business stakeholders in the area of maritime transport: • Developing and providing Maritime Single Windows (MSW) for B2G vessel’s electronic documentation; • Developing and providing a Port Management System; • Developing a Port Community system for B2G and B2B electronic data exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • The Climate of Northeastern Bulgaria As a Prerequisite for the Occurrence of Adverse and Hazardous (Risk) Phenomena
    International Journal of Physical and Social Science Vol. 8 Issue 1, January 2018 ISSN: 2249-5894 Impact Factor: 6.644 Journal Homepage: http://www.ijmra.us, Email: [email protected] Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A The climate of Northeastern Bulgaria as a prerequisite for the occurrence of adverse and hazardous (risk) phenomena Nina Chenkova* Abstract: The geographical area of Northeastern Bulgaria boasts a specific climate conditions. They are a prerequisite for the expression of adverse and hazardous natural phenomena. This report analyses the genesis and location of the adverse and dangerous meteorological, climate and hydrological phenomena within the Northeastern Bulgaria, which determined by climate conditions. Keywords: Northeastern Bulgaria, climate conditions, adverse and hazardous meteorological, climate and hydrological phenomena * Assoc. Prof. Dimitar Vladev, PhD, “Konstantin Preslavsky” University of Shumen, Faculty of Natural Science, Department of Geogpaphy, Bulgaria 20 International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences http://www.ijmra.us, Email: [email protected] ISSN: 2249-5894 Impact Factor: 6.644 Introduction Adverse and hazardous natural phenomena are subject to greater interest in the last few decades, not only scientifically but also by practical application point of view. The reason is their negative impact on other branches of the economy: agriculture, transport, tourism and others. Phenomena with a similar effect, which run a small or negligible speed, defined as adverse. Under the influence of certain factors such phenomena may acquire extreme values in space and time and can cause substantial damage to natural complex and society, and to cause casualties.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Social Values of Antiquities in Bulgaria: Anthropological Perspectives
    Center for Open Access in Science ▪ https://www.centerprode.com/ojas.html Open Journal for Anthropological Studies, 2018, 2(1), 1-12. ISSN (Online) 2560-5348 ▪ https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojas.0201.01001l _________________________________________________________________________ Social Values of Antiquities in Bulgaria: Anthropological Perspectives Tsvete Petrova Lazova New Bulgarian University, Department of Anthropology Received 30 March 2018 ▪ Revised 29 June 2018 ▪ Accepted 18 July 2018 Abstract This article analyses some aspects of the processes constructing values of the remote past and their role in the formation of national identity. The useful debate on “identity” provides a space to look at it not only as an analytical category but also as a practical one. As a category of practice it is concerned to be used by “lay” actors in some everyday settings to make sense of themselves and how they differ from others (Brubaker & Cooper, 2000). I focus therefore on antiquities – material and non-material artifacts – which play active role in everyday life as identity marker. They are seen as anthropological terrain where the “eye of anthropology” makes possible to evaluate the nature of discourses on antiquities as cultural products in the context of the imagined nation. This supposes to look not only at the rhetoric of the national(ist) discourse but also at its content. In a “longue durée” perspective it becomes possible to be traced the uses of antiquities in Bulgaria with its complexities and beyond the dynamics of transformations within the academic fields and their research agenda. This perspective is useful as it introduces the needed sensitivity to different intensities of nationalism across time and space as well as within the same space (Todorova, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and List of Rural Municipalities in Bulgaria
    I. ANNEXES 1 Annex 6. Map and list of rural municipalities in Bulgaria (according to statistical definition). 1 List of rural municipalities in Bulgaria District District District District District District /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality /Municipality Blagoevgrad Vidin Lovech Plovdiv Smolyan Targovishte Bansko Belogradchik Apriltsi Brezovo Banite Antonovo Belitsa Boynitsa Letnitsa Kaloyanovo Borino Omurtag Gotse Delchev Bregovo Lukovit Karlovo Devin Opaka Garmen Gramada Teteven Krichim Dospat Popovo Kresna Dimovo Troyan Kuklen Zlatograd Haskovo Petrich Kula Ugarchin Laki Madan Ivaylovgrad Razlog Makresh Yablanitsa Maritsa Nedelino Lyubimets Sandanski Novo Selo Montana Perushtitsa Rudozem Madzharovo Satovcha Ruzhintsi Berkovitsa Parvomay Chepelare Mineralni bani Simitli Chuprene Boychinovtsi Rakovski Sofia - district Svilengrad Strumyani Vratsa Brusartsi Rodopi Anton Simeonovgrad Hadzhidimovo Borovan Varshets Sadovo Bozhurishte Stambolovo Yakoruda Byala Slatina Valchedram Sopot Botevgrad Topolovgrad Burgas Knezha Georgi Damyanovo Stamboliyski Godech Harmanli Aitos Kozloduy Lom Saedinenie Gorna Malina Shumen Kameno Krivodol Medkovets Hisarya Dolna banya Veliki Preslav Karnobat Mezdra Chiprovtsi Razgrad Dragoman Venets Malko Tarnovo Mizia Yakimovo Zavet Elin Pelin Varbitsa Nesebar Oryahovo Pazardzhik Isperih Etropole Kaolinovo Pomorie Roman Batak Kubrat Zlatitsa Kaspichan Primorsko Hayredin Belovo Loznitsa Ihtiman Nikola Kozlevo Ruen Gabrovo Bratsigovo Samuil Koprivshtitsa Novi Pazar Sozopol Dryanovo
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Engagement Plan for the Eia Report on a Facility for Treatment and Conditioning of Radioactive Waste with High Volume Reduction Factor at Kozloduy Npp
    STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EIA REPORT ON A FACILITY FOR TREATMENT AND CONDITIONING OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE WITH HIGH VOLUME REDUCTION FACTOR AT KOZLODUY NPP August 2013 CONTENTS І. Introduction 2 ............................................................................................................ II. Project Location and Areas Subject to Impact 2 ............................................................................................................ ІІІ. Stakeholders 2 ............................................................................................................ ІV. Providing access to documentation 3 ............................................................................................................ V. Informing 4 ............................................................................................................ VІ. Consultation 5 ............................................................................................................ VІІ. Grievance mechanism 5 ............................................................................................................ Page 1/6 I. Introduction The present Stakeholders Engagement Plan was developed in support of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) procedure for an Investment Proposal for a Facility for treatment and conditioning of radioactive waste with high volume reduction factor at Kozloduy NPP. All the activities described below are based on Kozloduy NPP Plc.'s experience as regards corporate communication and communication
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria: Winter Birding Wonderland
    BULGARIA: WINTER BIRDING WONDERLAND 4 - 11 FEBRUARY 2020 Red-breasted Goose is the chief target on this trip. www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | ITINERARY Bulgaria: Winter Birding Wonderland 2020 This tour encompasses the best of Bulgaria, and indeed eastern European birding, during the winter months. While winter birding lacks the sheer diversity of the spring tour, it brings with it the vast numbers of geese and other waterfowl that make use of this small area in Eastern Europe to overwinter. High among these are large numbers of Red-breasted Geese, a globally threatened bird, along with the likes of Smew, White-headed Duck, and both Tundra and Whooper Swans. Aside from the truly impressive numbers of waterfowl, the key specials of Bulgaria and indeed, most of Europe are still on the cards and should still be seen. These are Grey-headed, Black, Syrian, and Middle-spotted Woodpeckers, Short-toed Treecreeper, Dalmatian Pelican, Pygmy Cormorant, Rough-legged and Long-legged Buzzards, Calandra Lark, Sombre Tit, Ring Ouzel, Spotted Nutcracker, and White-tailed Eagle. Other key advantages of this tour are: - Short traveling and a high diversity and numbers of birds. - All of the important observation points (lakes) are relatively small and easily accessible in winter conditions. - The highest concentration of waterbirds - around Lake Burgas (up to 230 000 Geese) and Durankulak Lake (up to 250 000 Geese), compared to their area. - The brackish and freshwater lakes situated near the Black Sea Coast attract a high diversity of birds – up to 150 species for the tour. Itinerary (8 days/7 nights) Day 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Projects Without Project Ecologies: Experiments in Regional Governance from the Netherlands to Bulgaria and Back
    Projects without Project Ecologies: Experiments in Regional Governance from the Netherlands to Bulgaria and Back Elena Boyanova Krumova Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Elena Krumova All rights reserved ABSTRACT Projects without Project Ecologies: Experiments in Regional Governance from the Netherlands to Bulgaria and Back Elena Boyanova Krumova This dissertation investigates the efforts of a temporary organization, or a project, to assemble a set of diverse stakeholders to deliberate and chart a territorial plan for the Black Sea coastal region in Bulgaria. The project lasted two years and tried to apply the integrated method of regional planning developed in the area around the port of Rotterdam. It was led by a Dutch consultant and a team of Dutch and Bulgarian environmental experts. The main question the dissertation addresses is how a temporary organization operates in an environment that provides little support for its actions. All new organizations, but temporary ones in particular, have a high risk of failure due to limited time to set roles for their members, establish trust among them, and build a common identity. Temporary organizations have been shown to rely on role structures, identities, and sources of trust outside of the organization itself. Project ecologies comprised of personal and organizational ties built around industries and geographical areas facilitate their work. Usually the existence of such ecologies is assumed in research on organizations. There are few studies addressing the question how such ecologies might come into being or how an organization that lacks the support of ecologies might try to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Identification of Microcystin
    toxins Article Morphological and Molecular Identification of Microcystin-Producing Cyanobacteria in Nine Shallow Bulgarian Water Bodies Mariana Radkova 1, Katerina Stefanova 1, Blagoy Uzunov 2,* , Georg Gärtner 3 and Maya Stoyneva-Gärtner 2 1 AgroBio Institute, Bulgarian Agricultural Academy, BG-1164 Sofia, Bulgaria; [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (K.S.) 2 Faculty of Biology, Department of Botany, Sofia University, BG-1164 Sofia, Bulgaria; [email protected] 3 Institute of Botany, Innsbruck University, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: buzunov@uni-sofia.bg Received: 6 November 2019; Accepted: 6 January 2020; Published: 8 January 2020 Abstract: The paper presents results from the first application of polyphasic approach in studies of field samples from Bulgaria. This approach, which combined the conventional light microscopy (LM) and molecular-genetic methods (based on PCR amplified fragments of microcystin synthetase gene mcyE), revealed that almost all microcystin-producers in the studied eutrophic waterbodies belong to the genus Microcystis. During the molecular identification of toxin-producing strains by use of HEPF × HEPR pair of primers, we obtained 57 sequences, 56 of which formed 28 strains of Microcystis, spread in six clusters of the phylogenetic tree. By LM, seven Microcystis morphospecies were identified (M. aeruginosa, M. botrys, M. flos-aquae, M. natans, M. novacekii, M. smithii, and M. wesenbergii). They showed significant morphological variability and contributed from <1% to 98% to the total biomass. All data support the earlier opinions that taxonomic revision of Microcystis is needed, proved the presence of toxigenic strains in M. aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii, and suppose their existence in M.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L129
    Official Journal L 129 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 62 English edition Legislation 17 May 2019 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/791 of 16 May 2019 amending for the 302nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations ..................................................................................................... 1 DECISIONS ★ Council Decision (EU) 2019/792 of 13 May 2019 entrusting to the European Commission — the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) — the exercise of certain powers conferred on the appointing authority and the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment ............................................................... 3 ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/793 of 16 May 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2019) 3797) (1) ............... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ★ Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/794 of 15 May 2019 on a coordinated control plan with a view to establishing the prevalence of certain substances migrating from materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (notified under document C(2019) 3519) (1) .......... 37 (1) Text with EEA relevance. (Continued overleaf)
    [Show full text]
  • Network Program Democracy
    Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria Final Report Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria 1998-2002 FINAL REPORT TO THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Cooperative Agreement No. 181-A-00-98-00320-00 Institute for Sustainable Communities 535 Stone Cutters Way, Montpelier, VT 05602 USA Phone 802-229-2900 | Fax 802-229-2919 [email protected] | www.iscvt.org April 2003 Photos, front and back inside covers: Bulgarian landscapes; next page: DemNet-supported activities of SO partners and NGOs working for positive change in Bulgaria. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary • 6 II. The Context • 8 III. Program Design & Goals • 9 IV. Strengthening the Capacity of SO Partners • 11 • SELECTING SUPPORT ORGANIZATION PARTNERS • ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING • DEEPENING PROGRAM IMPACT • KEY OUTCOMES IN DEMNET’S FUNCTIONAL AREAS V. SO Partner Performance Stories • 22 VI. Supporting a Vibrant NGO Sector & Strengthening Civil Society in Bulgaria • 24 • TARGETING UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS & IMPROVING SOCIAL SAFETY NETS • CREATING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY • NETWORKING & COALITION BUILDING FOR SUPPORT & SUSTAINABILITY • STRENGTHENING OUTREACH & PUBLIC RELATIONS • INCREASING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN POLICY DIALOGUE VII. Lessons Learned • 27 VIII. Conclusion • 29 IX. Attachments A: DEMNET SO PARTNER PUBLICATION B: SO PARTNER SUMMARIES C: ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING & PERFORMANCE MONITORING COMPONENTS D: SERVICE QUALITY REVIEW REPORT E: DONOR SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY F: ENGAGE INITIATIVE REPORT G: TRAVEL NOTES PUBLICATION (ENGAGE INITIATIVE) H: VOICES FOR CHANGE PUBLICATION I: ADVOCACY INITIATIVE REPORT J: LEADING LIGHTS PUBLICATION K: SUMMARY OF NGO GRANTEES L: SENSE OF EMPOWERMENT VIDEO Acknowledgements The success of any project is in the hands of many people—the SO partners, the capable and dedicated ISC staff in Bulgaria, many excellent consultants who supported the program, and the Bulgaria USAID mission that provided sound support and counsel at critical junctures.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Biking Tour
    PIRT Mountain Biking Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Itinerary 2. Bulgaria-Turkey ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Additional Sites Included in the Itinerary Nr. 2 ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 Introduction For a ticket to adventure, bring your mountain bike to the Black Sea Region. The four countries around the Black Sea- Bulgaria, Turkey, Georgia and Armenia, are a paradise for mountain biking with innumerable cycle routes on gravel roads, in the mountains and along rough cart roads. Their dramatic natural landscapes offer challenging and rewarding slick rock trails, lush green single track, ruins of ancient civilizations, canyons and secret paths to explore. The mountain biking in and around Black Sea is some of the best trail riding in Europe. There are no restrictions on using bikes on the routes. Most of the routes are suitable for energetic mountain biking. Mountain biking is best between May and June or September and October. Itinerary 2- The “Black Sea Discovery”
    [Show full text]