North Yorkshire County Council

Business and Environmental Services

Executive Members

4 February 2016

Highways Capital Programme 2016/17

Report of the Assistant Director – Highways and Transportation

1.0 Purpose of Report

1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek Corporate Director, Business and Environmental Services (BES) in consultation with BES Executive Members agreement for changes to the Highways Capital Programme for Street Lighting, Bridges and Structures, Integrated Transport and Structural Highway Maintenance for 2016/17 and for 2017/18 headline allocations as part of the rolling two year capital programme.

1.2 This report also includes an update on proposed changes to the Highway Maintenance funding formula and our ‘incentive fund’ self-assessment banding.

2.0 Background

2.1 The Highways Capital Programme is made up of four specific elements; these are Street Lighting; Bridges and Structures; Integrated Transport and Structural Highway Maintenance. Each of these elements is subject to prioritisation methods based upon an assessment of the problem that is being addressed.

2.2 A report was considered by the BES Executive Members in July 2015 when alongside carry-forward schemes and proposed allocations of additional funding for 2015/16, the 2016/17 capital works programme was agreed.

2.3 The Department for Transport (DfT) confirmed the LTP block allocations for Integrated Transport and the draft “needs based” Highway Maintenance allocation in July and December 2015 respectively. Members will note from previous reports that the funding formula for both the Integrated Transport Block and Highway Maintenance have changed. These changes took effect from 01 April 2015 for Integrated Transport and will take effect from 01 April 2016 for Highway Maintenance.

2.4 This Report also contains details of essential changes to the 2016/17 Capital Programme, in terms of those schemes that it has been necessary to add or remove from the Programme, since it was agreed by BES Executive Members

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/1

in July 2015. It also sets out details of the proposed headline allocations for 2017/18 as well as further information on the changes to the funding formula for Highway Maintenance.

3.0 Funding Changes

3.1 As set out in paragraph 2.3 above, the DfT has announced the Local Highway Maintenance Block Funding Settlements for 2016/17 to 2020/1. These settlements are based on a new funding formula that the DfT consulted on during the autumn of 2014.

3.2 In broad terms the new funding formula has been amended to remove the perverse incentive of rewarding poor highway condition with extra funding; in a number of cases authorities that have not spent the whole of their highway maintenance allocation on highway maintenance and therefore have highways in poor condition have then received a higher capital settlement as a result of their poor highway condition.

3.3 Rather than taking any account of the highway condition the new ‘needs- based’ formula is based purely on the size of the highway asset (e.g. length of road, number of bridges, number of street lights etc.). The national (England) block of highway maintenance capital funding is distributed in accordance with the size of the highway asset. In broad terms this has benefitted the County Council as previously our highway asset was in a comparatively good condition.

3.4 In addition to the ‘needs-based’ element above, as part of the review of the allocation of highway maintenance capital funding, the DfT has introduced two new initiatives; an ‘incentive’ element and a ‘challenge fund’.

3.5 Incentive element

3.5.1 The DfT is keen to ensure that all authorities get the best value for money from their highway maintenance capital funding allocation. To encourage this they have introduced an ‘incentive’ element to the allocation of the maintenance funding. Whilst in 2015/16 each authority received 100% of its allocation based on the existing needs based formula, for future years this will be reduced if the authority does not meet a number of criteria (set by the DfT) that reflect their efficiencies in highway maintenance and the adoption of asset management. In order to receive the incentive fund, local highways authorities are required to assess themselves annually into a particular banding and provide evidence by way of a questionnaire.

3.5.3 In November 2015 we took part in an external LGA/HMEP review of the highways maintenance service. The overall outcome was that we compared favourably with other councils with strong leadership, good communications

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/2

and customer focus being highlighted. There are further days arranged picking up on areas where improvements were highlighted. This work will continue into 2016/17 and will be used to inform our 2017/18 funding assessment.

3.5.4 Table 1 below contains details of the County Council’s allocations for 2016/17 to 2020/21 together with the implications of the ‘incentive’ element, potentially £14.1M over five years.

Table 1 Extra Sum available through Allocation Year ‘Incentive’ element (£M) Band 3 Band 2 Band 1 2016/17 £27.182 1.645 1.645 1.481 2017/18 £26.359 2.468 2.221 1.481 2018/19 £23.858 4.969 3.478 1.491 2019/20 £23.858 4.969 2.485 0.497 2020/21 £23.858 4.969 1.491 0 Total £125.115 19.02 11.32 4.95

3.6 Challenge fund

3.6.1 As part of the December 2014 announcement the DfT released details of a new Local Highway Maintenance Challenge Fund. For the funding period to 2020/21 this has been split into two tranches; one covers the period 2015/16 to 2017/18 (worth £275M nationally), and the second covering the period 2018/19 to 2020/21 (worth £300M nationally). This funding is provided from top slicing the national funding allocation for highway maintenance.

3.6.2 Bids for tranche 1 were submitted to the DfT by 9th February 2015. The fund is open to all English highway authorities outside London and is available ‘to enable local highway authorities in England to bid for major maintenance projects that are otherwise difficult to fund through the normal needs element allocations’.

3.6.3 Executive Members will recall that in February 2015 the County Council submitted two bids for funding into the Challenge Fund. These bids were for maintenance of the A63 Selby Bypass and for a package of landslip remedial measures in the Yorkshire Dales (primarily in Swaledale and at Kex Gill). Neither of these bids was successful in attracting funding from the Government. Feedback from Government indicated that although the schemes scored relatively well in terms of the Department for Transport’s assessment criteria, the Challenge Fund as a whole was vastly oversubscribed (over 100 bids were submitted with only 31 being funded) and the County Councils bids did not score highly enough to attract the limited funding available.

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/3

3.6.4 It is likely that there will be another opportunity to bid for this Challenge Fund probably in 2017/18. Officers are further developing medium term proposals for landslip stabilisation at Kex Gill as a potential bid for the next round of funding.

4.0 Christmas 2015 Flood Damage

4.1 Members will be aware of the substantial damage caused during the Christmas storm; most significant of which is the damage to Tadcaster Bridge which made national headlines and attracted visits from senior politicians and royalty alike. Although it is very early in the process of assessing the cost of the damage, preliminary estimations have been reported at £5 million to repair the highway infrastructure; this includes around £3.5 million for the repair of Tadcaster Bridge, with the remainder for the repairs of various roads damaged by flood water.

5.0 Proposed Changes to the Agreed 2016/17 Works Programme

5.1 Street Lighting

5.1.1 As a 2016/17 Street Lighting Programme has not yet been agreed by BES Executive Members, it is attached as Appendix 4

5.2 Bridges and Structures

5.2.1 There have been no changes to the 2016/17 Works Programme. Members will be aware of the damage to Tadcaster Bridge, which remains the highest priority for the Service Area. Other structures around the County were affected by the recent flooding event and analysis of the recent survey data is currently on-going. Clearly Tadcaster Bridge and any other urgent bridge works will affect the agreed works on the Capital Programme; however, at this time it is too early to give any further details. Tadcaster Bridge, other affected structures and their influence on the Capital Programme will be reported to a future BES Executive Members meeting.

5.3 Integrated Transport

5.3.1 There are no changes proposed to the Integrated Transport Programme that BES Executive Members approved in February 2015.

5.4 Structural Highway Maintenance

5.4.1 Appendices 2 and 2.1 of this report contain details of essential changes to the 2016/17 Capital Programme for agreement by BES Executive Members, in the form of schemes that are proposed to be added or removed. A short explanation for either their inclusion or exclusion is also provided.

5.4.2 Reasons for schemes removed from the programme include reprioritisation due to works being brought forward into the current year, and other works being in greater need resulting in other works being pushed into future years. Some surface dressing sites have been removed from the programme as they

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/4

have deteriorated to a condition beyond which a preventative treatment is appropriate or have not been prepared to receive a dressing.

5.4.3 Reasons for schemes added to the programme include the additional funding which was provided through the NYCC match to the Local Growth Fund and to replace schemes which have been removed from the programme through reprioritisation.

5.4.4 Additionally, the surface dressing programme has been adjusted to maximise efficiency by increasing sites adjacent to each other and reducing the number of isolated sites.

5.4.5 Reasons for schemes being removed from the programme include the cost of disposal of tar-bound materials. UK Roads constructed prior to 1980 or Surface Dressed prior to the late 1980s may contain tar. Coal Tar is classed as a carcinogen and depending upon quantity is potentially a hazardous material. At preliminary design stage the presence of tar on a scheme is unknown; however, during detailed design site investigation identifies tar. Unfortunately the disposal of tar-bound material costs significantly more than normal road arising’s.

5.5 Traffic Data Collection

5.5.1 As a result of an on-going review this service is being split into three component parts; this will result in 47% savings to the overall budget year on year (£70k from £130k); however, some of the data collection apparatus is at the end of its service life and requires replacement, therefore for 2016/17 and additional £20k is allocated for essential replacement equipment.

6.0 Proposed Headline Allocation for 2017/18 and 2018/19

6.1 The proposed headline allocations for the 2017/18 and 2018/19 Highways Capital Works Programme for agreement by BES Executive Members are set out in Table 2 below:

Table 2

Proposed 2017/18 Allocation

£000 Street Lighting 800 Bridges and Structures 2,060 Integrated Transport 1,130 Structural Highway 34,688 Maintenance Total 38,678

6.2 BES Executive Members will recall that the County Council sought funding for a number of transport improvements from the Government’s Local Growth Fund (LGF) through the York, North Yorkshire and East Riding Strategic Economic Plan (SEP) which was prepared by the Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP). As part of the Local Growth Fund settlement to the LEP,

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/5

approval for £24M funding over the five year period 2016/17 to 2020/21 was granted for the maintenance of Category 4 roads linking into local growth centres in North Yorkshire. In common with a number of other major schemes nationally, the DfT has decided to manage the allocation of the funding directly rather than devolve it to the LEP. BES Executive Members should also note that 2017/18 includes an incentive element to the highway maintenance allocation, of which further details are contained in Section 3.5 above.

6.3 A breakdown of the funding available for the 2017/18 capital works programme and the corresponding headline allocations are set out in Appendices 1 and 3 of this report respectively.

7.0 Priorities for 2017/18

7.1 Street Lighting

7.1.1 The proposed Street Lighting headline allocation for agreement by BES Executive Members is £0.8M.

7.1.2 Since 2005 North Yorkshire County Council has replaced approximately 24,500 of its 50,000 street lighting columns. The specification used for the new lighting columns is expected to provide a minimum life span of 40 years therefore replacement of these columns should not be required prior to 2047.

7.1.3 On-going inspections continue to identify serious deficiencies in the street lighting stock present in the Scarborough and Harrogate urban areas; these were formerly maintained by the Borough Councils under the Agency Agreements. The existing columns in these locations, and to a lesser extent in other parts of the County, are suffering from a variety of problems including severe internal and external corrosion with perforation around the base which can result in catastrophic failure. The issues primarily relate to Revo, Stewert & Lloyd and Cohen of Manchester columns together with the converted cast iron gas lamps in Harrogate.

7.1.4 The 2016/17 proposal is outlined in the attached appendix however a minimum requirement of £0.2M for Scarborough, £0.3M for Harrogate and Knaresborough and £0.3M for the remainder of the street lighting stock across the County has already been identified for 2017/18 and it is anticipated that further allocations will be required in future years. This will be the subject of further reports to BES Executive Members in due course.

7.2 Bridges and Structures

7.2.1 The proposed Bridges and Structures headline allocation for agreement by BES Executive Members is £2.06M, which is the same as in previous years.

7.2.2 It is proposed that the funding will continue to be targeted at maintaining and strengthening the existing structures stock. The analysis of routine or special inspection reports will identify and prioritise those bridges and structures in need of treatment. In addition, some structural repairs to retaining walls will be required. Information is currently being collected.

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/6

7.3 Integrated Transport

7.3.1 The proposed Integrated Transport headline allocation for agreement by BES Executive Members is £1.13M. The individual budget headings that make up this figure are contained in Appendix 6, with the corresponding rationale set out below:

a) Accident Investigation: It is proposed to retain the block allocation in order to ensure that the Council remains able to identify and treat safety critical sites and routes in line with its statutory duty;

b) Signs, Lines and TROs: This allocation is calculated on a per capita/district basis and it is identified for road markings, regulatory signage together with the costs for legal advertising.

c) Traffic Signal Control: This allocation funds signal timing reviews and appraisals, upgrades and refurbishment of traffic signals and signal controlled crossings, in line with the ‘Manage, Maintain and Improve’ approach.

d) Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) budget: The CIL was introduced by Government in 2010 and is a levy that local planning authorities can charge on new developments in their area. The money can then be used to support development by funding infrastructure such as roads, bridges or a new health centre. This budget is available to allow the County Council, as local highway authority, to carry out any specialist work associated with CIL development.

e) Local Accessibility Funding: This is a budget to help the County Council comply with its Public Sector Equalities Duty under the Public Sector Equality Act (2010). It has been available since 2013/14 and has been used to fund typically small scale, but nevertheless important, schemes such as dropped crossings to improve access for people with certain protected characteristics.

f) Parking Management: The County Council Parking Strategy makes a commitment to review the need and potential for further on-street parking management measures during the lifespan of the third Local Transport Plan (2011/12 to 2015/16). Northallerton was the first phase of the review and there is a need to undertake further phases of the review in other districts within the County.

7.4 Structural Highway Maintenance

7.4.1 Asset Related Capital Projects

a. Network Condition Surveys (SCANNER / SCRIM / CVI): £215K Network Condition Surveys include the annual programmes of SCANNER (a machine based condition survey that identifies carriageway surface condition), SCRIM (measurement of the skid resistance of the carriageway surface) and CVI (Course Visual

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/7

Inspection) surveys that identify carriageway surface defects of the carriageway network. We assess the most heavily used (Category 2, 3a, 3b) roads each year using SCANNER and SCRIM surveys. The lesser used (Category 4a, 4b, 5) roads are assessed 50% per year using CVI surveys. . The analysis of the condition surveys is reported back to DfT as part of the Councils Single Data Set suite of indicators. b. Traffic Data Collection: £90K We maintain traffic count data on a network of permanent traffic data collection sites, approximately 270 in total. The data is available internally and to partner organisations. We also generate some income from developers and consultants who require the data to produce traffic data for residential and industrial developments. c. CIPFA / Whole Government Accounts: £6K The annual (Corporate) return for carriageways / footways and general highway infrastructure assets. The Symology: Insight analysis and outturn report identifies the Gross Replacement Cost/ Depreciated Replacement Cost and annual depreciation of the these broad range of highways assets. The outturns for road lighting, traffic management systems and bridges are calculated separately. d. HMEP Life Cycle Planning Toolkit: £10K The DfT released a number of Life Cycle Planning Toolkits to assist Highway Authorities in the development of Life Cycle Plans for various highway assets. Life Cycle Plans are used to articulate the steady state cost of maintaining assets at a network level. The use of Life Cycle Planning is essential if we are to gain ‘Band 3’ incentive funding in the future. e. North Yorkshire Strategic Traffic Model (NYSTM) Annual Update: £10K The NYSTM outputs assist both policy and strategy review and revision in addition to providing design criteria / standards and network management outputs in order to assist in delivering a consistent service across the County. NYSTM outputs comprise of: i. Review and revision of the categorised carriageway network model by providing estimates of traffic flows on the A, B, C and Unclassified Road networks – this helps determine carriageway design and maintenance standards;

ii. Helps update Street Reinstatement categories and Traffic Sensitive Street designations in line with the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991 criteria which have a direct impact on carriageway reinstatement standards; iii. Assessing the effectiveness and impact of HA Tactical and Strategic diversion routes for HGV’s to help initiatives such as the Freight Quality Partnerships;

iv. To allow the assessment of the strategic impact of major developments and LDF allocations on the categorised carriageway network;

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/8

v. To derive Million Standard Axles (MSA) on the highway network for use in both carriageway design and maintenance schemes.

f. Site Investigation / Pavement Analysis: £100K This budget is used to support the treatment options assessment and detailed design processes with the intention of ensuring that selected treatments are effective, efficient and minimise life cycle costs and delivering more accurate scheme cost estimates.

g. Inspection of Highway related Drainage Culverts (600 to 900mm ID): £10K In conjunction with the proposed reduction in the frequency of cyclic (routine) gully cleaning it is imperative to ensure that the larger diameter culverts are both structurally sound and free of obstructions. We intend to identify the asset inventory, arrange both general and principal inspections and initiate any consequential repairs via the highways drainage works programme.

h. Highway Drainage Assets: £20K During 2014/15 we initiated an initial inventory and condition survey of additional highway drainage assets (pumps, ponds, swales) that generally have reverted to the County Council as part of the de-trunking process. As a consequence we have identified the need to implement an annual service inspection and repair programme for these highway drainage assets.

i. Structures: £102K In the same way that we undertake annual carriageway condition surveys we carry out similar ‘inspections’ on our structures asset. This funding block covers:  General Inspections  Principal Inspections  Structural Assessments  Special Inspections

The identification of ‘works programmes’ is based upon the results of detailed inspections, structural assessments and data analysis.

7.4.2 Structural Highway Maintenance Capital Programme

7.4.3 The aim of the Structural Highway Maintenance Capital Programme is to maintain the highway network including its supporting assets as effectively as possible within existing financial constraints. In order to achieve this we ‘top slice’ the overall budget in order to maintain ‘supporting and ancillary assets’ which are as follows:

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/9

7.4.4 Footways:

7.4.5 It is intended to continue to fund maintenance of the footway network (approx. 4250km) in line with historical allocations as this level of funding in conjunction with our robust cyclic inspection regime is responsible for the gradual reduction in successful 3rd Party Insurance claims.

7.4.6 The DfT have traditionally monitored the condition of the most heavily used element of the Footway network (cat 1a, 1 and 2), in a similar way to carriageways and as a result the scheme based programme is based upon network condition surveys with schemes prioritised across the whole of the countywide network.

7.4.7 The programme for Cat 3, 4 and 5 Footways is based upon locations initially identified by Local Area Offices which are subsequently condition surveyed, and assessed in the same way as the heavily used footway network with the resulting schemes prioritised across the whole of the countywide network.

7.4.8 The Surface Treatment budget acknowledges that many of the lesser used footways (Categories 3, 4 and 5) benefit in the same way as carriageways with the application of preventative maintenance treatments. The budget allocation is based upon the (estimated) percentage of footway network in each Area; each Area Office is responsible for the identification of their programme which is based upon local knowledge and the cyclic Highway Safety Inspections.

7.4.9 The Footway patching budget is allocated on the percentage of that category of footway network within the Highways Area Office boundary.

7.4.10 Cycleways / Cycle Tracks: £30K and £30K

It is intended to continue to fund maintenance of the Cycling Network in line with last year’s allocations.

7.5 Street Furniture

7.5.1 Vehicle Restraint Systems (VRS): £300K

7.5.2 As a consequence of implementing cyclic condition assessments and service inspections on our Vehicle Restraint Systems (VRS) installed on the more heavily used roads across the County (Cat 2, 3a and 3b) we have identified a substantial backlog of essential replacement and improvement work. The locations will be prioritised in accordance with existing risk mitigation procedures.

7.6 Cattle Grids: £200K

7.6.1 We have introduced an annual programme of targeted cattle grid maintenance and replacement in order to continue to reduce the maintenance back log.

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/10

7.8.1 Unsurfaced Unclassified Roads (UUR) – Category 6 Roads: £20K and £80K (Combined £100K)

7.8.2 A Pilot Project has been planned for management of UURs in the Scarborough District area by Waste and Countryside Services (WACS). This pilot is scheduled to commence in April 2016 for one year. As part of this pilot, management and maintenance activities will be assessed with a view to the WACS taking over the management of all UURs Countywide. During this interim period WACS will be allocated £20k for maintenance with the remaining £80k retained by Highways Area Teams until the results of the pilot have been analysed.

7.9 None Carriageway Pavement Areas (Other Special Engineering Schemes): £600K

7.9.1 The annual programme of ‘Other’ Special Engineering Schemes is based upon locations identified by Area Offices which do not fall ‘objectively’ into other works categories, e.g. areas of cobbles or setts, laybys etc. Area Offices identify the rationale behind their submissions and the countywide programme is determined based upon an assessment of need and network priority.

7.10 Slope Stabilisation (Special Engineering Schemes): £600K

7.10.1 Landslips can and do occur at any time of the year although many are identified as a consequence of routine Highway Safety Inspections. Area Offices submit locations which are subsequently prioritised countywide based upon an assessment of need and network priority.

7.11 Drainage £600K

We acknowledge that we need to continue our capital investment in the highway drainage network in order to reduce water ingress into the roads structural layers (the winter freeze/ thaw cycle is the catalyst for pothole formation) and to prevent localised flooding of the road surface and adjacent properties. This budget allocation is based upon the proportion of the surfaced road network within each Highway Operations area. Each Area Office is subsequently responsible for the identification of their works programme that is based upon local knowledge, Highway Safety Inspections and local priorities.

8.0 Financial Implications

8.1 See Sections 4 to 6 above and Appendices 1 to 6 attached, which set out the financial aspects of this report relative to 2016/17 and 2017/18 capital works programmes.

8.2 More widely, one of the benefits associated with setting a rolling two-year capital works programme is reduced financial risk through greater flexibility of budgetary and programme management across a two year period.

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/11

9.0 Equalities Implications

9.1 Consideration has been given to the potential for any adverse equality impacts arising from the recommendation and an Equality Impact Assessment screening form is attached at Annex 2

9.2 Moreover, the proposed continuation of the Local Accessibility Fund should ensure that the County Council is in a position to fulfil its statutory duty under the Equalities Act (2010).

10.0 Legal Implications

10.1 The County Council, as Local Highway Authority, Lead Local Flood Authority, Street Authority and Traffic Authority has a wide range of statutory duties imposed by a variety of legislation.

10.2 The proposed capital programme allocations and schemes have been developed and prioritised in line with the relevant legislation such as the Highways Act 1980, The Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, The Transport Act 2000, Traffic Management Act 2004 and the Flood and Water Management Act 2010.

10.3 It is the view of officers that there are no legal implications in terms of planning, procurement or highway obligations associated with the content of this report.

11.0 Recommendation

11.1 It is recommended that Executive Members agree the:

(i) Changes to the 2016/17 Capital Allocations and Works Programme as contained in Section 5 and Appendices 2 of this Report; and

(ii) Proposed 2017/18 headline allocations for Street Lighting, Bridges and Structures, Integrated Transport and Highway Maintenance as set out in sections 6 and 7 and Appendices 5, and 6 of this report

BARRIE MASON Assistant Direct Highways and Transportation

Author of Report: Allan McVeigh

Background Documents: None

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/12

Sources of Funding Statement 2015/16 and 2016/17 APPENDIX 1 2016/17 2017/18 SOURCES OF FUNDING £000 £000

Local Transport Plan DfT Grant

Structural Highway Maintenance 27,182 26,359 Integrated Transport 3,023 3023

Sub total 30,205 29,382

Grant other ( EA, Local Growth Fund) 5,000 5000

Highway Maintenance incentive element 1,645 2,468

Revenue Contribution

Countywide CPE 75 -

Funded from NYCC Centre 2,000 2000

Sub Total 2,075 2,000

Other Funding

Re- phasing of Sandsend Slope Stabilisation 814 -

Carry Forward from 2015/16 800 -

Sub Total 1,614 -

Total Budget Available 40,539 38,850

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/13

Proposed New Schemes for Inclusion in 2016/17 Capital Programme APPENDIX 2

Surface Dressing

Road Allocation Category Area Town Address Estimate Comments number Oct 15 Replacement sites for Carriageway 3a Hambleton Boroughbridge Road Northallerton A167 8,142.05 16/17 Otterington House To Replacement sites for Carriageway 3a Hambleton North Otterington A167 Corpse Road 6,491.36 16/17 Corpse Road To Replacement sites for Carriageway 3a Hambleton North Otterington A167 Solberge Lodge 3,549.15 16/17 Solberge Lodge To South Replacement sites for Carriageway 3a Hambleton South Otterington A167 Otterington Crossroads 5,318.75 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 2 Hambleton Sutton Road Thirsk A170 58,091.28 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 3b Hambleton Lime Lane Kirklington B6267 34,005.40 16/17 Ainderby Quernhow To Ainderby Replacement sites for Carriageway 3b Hambleton B6267 Butcher House Bridge Quernow 5,692.89 16/17 Irving House Farm Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Access To Rounton West Rounton C1 3,674.64 16/17 Funding Gates Appleton Wiske To Irving Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Appleton Wiske C1 House Farm Access 4,446.44 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton West Lane Appleton Wiske C1 2,568.91 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Hornby To West Lane Hornby C1 6,980.47 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Hornby Village Street Hornby C1 2,195.88 16/17 Funding Newton On Ouse To Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Newton-On-Ouse C100 York Bridge 9,617.88 16/17 Thornton Le Beans Thorton Le Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton C11 Village Street Beans 5,273.50 16/17 Funding

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/14

Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Moor Lane Crosby C11 13,766.75 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Tickergate Lane Little Holtby C132 4,752.36 16/17 Five Lane Ends To High Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Snape C133 Burton 15,235.00 16/17 Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Birkby Lane Birkby C148 12,204.43 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Cross Rein Bank East Cowton C148 5,048.42 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Birkby Lane East Cowton C148 2,324.36 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Deighton Lane Deighton C148 13,160.28 16/17 Deighton To Welbury Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Welbury C148 Crossing 8,248.71 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Deighton Lane Brompton C150 33,523.56 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Dikes Lane Great Ayton C153 4,214.00 16/17 East Harlsey To Junction LGF Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton For East Rounton East Harlsey C158 Funding 3,834.90 16/17 Brickyard Plantation West Rounton Low Lane LGF To Junction For East Replacement sites for Funding Carriageway 4a Hambleton West Rounton C158 Rounton Brickyard 5,639.13 16/17 Plantation Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton The Avenue Dalby C172 5,219.31 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton High Lane Dalby C172 2,156.25 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Bonnygate Lane Brandsby C172 8,378.05 16/17 Rising Sun House To Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Yearsley C178 Oak Trees 5,512.00 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Race Lane Sessay C179 24,487.50 16/17

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/15

Road From Spring Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Cottages To Jobbing Pilmoor C179 9,356.54 16/17 Cross Brafferton To Eldmire Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Brafferton C179 Moor 5,264.71 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Moor Lane Myton-On-Swale C185 9,349.92 16/17 Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Sinderby Village Street Sinderby C187 1,821.88 16/17 Funding Sinderby To Ainderby Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Sinderby C187 Quernhow 3,268.02 16/17 Funding Welbury Crossing To Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Welbury C2 Low Moor Lane 3,443.99 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Low Moor Lane West Harlsey C2 7,066.39 16/17 Funding East Harlsey To Junction LGF For East Rounton Replacement sites for Funding Carriageway 4a Hambleton East Harlsey C2 Brickyard Plantation 5,273.11 16/17

Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton East Harlsey To Loop East Harlsey C2 9,253.94 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Featherbed Lane Borrowby C2 1,809.11 16/17 Funding Masham Bridge To High Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Masham C31 Burton 5,702.99 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Phlashetts Lane Well C36 3,787.99 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Well Bank Well C36 1,527.61 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Bedale Road Well C36 4,095.62 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Well Lane Snape C36 5,105.54 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Watery Lane Snape C36 1,772.27 16/17 Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Fleetham Lane Scruton C40 8,685.87 16/17 Funding

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/16

Road From Fleetham LGF Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Lane To Common Lane Scruton C40 Funding 813.86 16/17

Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Station Road Scruton C40 5,669.98 16/17 Funding Crossways Wood To Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Thirn C42 Marriforth Bank 12,122.89 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Watlass Lane Snape C52 5,406.54 16/17 Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton Lowfield Lane Kirkby Fleetham C55 2,951.53 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Flawith To Myton Gates Flawith C87 7,219.49 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton East Lane Shipton C92 3,094.57 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Corban Lane Shipton C92 2,437.48 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Lords Lane Exelby U1507 3,422.43 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton New Inn Lane Carthorpe U1521 2,607.18 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Mires Lane Carthorpe U1522 2,374.48 16/17 Oulston Road To Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Easingwold U1580 Thornton Lane 2,234.42 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Thornton Lane Coxwold U1580 11,663.10 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Fawdington Road Fawdington U1597 15,820.00 16/17 Raskelf To Thirsk Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Raskelf U1613 Easingwold Road 3,366.86 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4a Hambleton Raskelf Village Street Raskelf U1613 1,605.51 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton North Moor Road Easingwold U1626 3,170.19 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Greengates Lane Flawith U1673 7,471.50 16/17

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/17

Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Main Street Huby U1687 5,194.00 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Easingwold Road Huby U1687 3,713.38 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Main Street Huby U1687 1,641.15 16/17 Sidings Hotel To Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Shipton U1721 Bennigbrough Bridge 13,427.00 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Islebeck Lane Islebeck/Dalton U1794 7,633.00 16/17 Kildale To Baysdale Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Baysdale U1844 Abbey 37,301.25 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Dikes Lane Great Ayton U1848 8,662.50 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Gribdale Gate To Kildale Kildale U1848 39,033.75 16/17 Ellerbeck To East Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Swainby U1894 Harlsey Loop Road 2,648.74 16/17 Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Long Lane Brompton U1908 10,677.76 16/17 Funding Scholla Lane To Crosby Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Crosby U1969 Track 9,908.50 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Cross Lanes Farm Track Scruton U2195 1,710.00 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Greengate Lane Kirkby Fleetham U2202 4,248.68 16/17 Replacement sites for LGF Carriageway 4b Hambleton Kirkby Lane Kirkby Fleetham U2202 5,442.61 16/17 Funding Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Ness Lane Pickhill U2225 3,159.78 16/17 Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Coulston Road Northallerton U2550 6,161.75 16/17 Long Lane Crossing To Replacement sites for Carriageway 4b Hambleton Ellerbeck U3120 West Harlsey 16,469.37 16/17 Additional site identified Gate Lodge To North Carriageway 3a Harrogate North Stainley A6108 – part of existing Leys 31,469.21 scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/18

Additional site identified

Carriageway 3a Harrogate Oaker Bank Beckwithshaw B6161 – part of existing 47,537.24 scheme Additional site identified Whipley Bank To Pye Carriageway 3a Harrogate Clint B6165 – part of existing Lane 16,988.93 scheme Ripley Northern Additional site identified

Carriageway 3a Harrogate Roundabout To Scarah Ripley B6165 – part of existing 31,024.64 Bank scheme Additional site identified

Carriageway 3b Harrogate Wetherby Road Boroughbridge C267 – part of existing 18,752.58 scheme Additional site identified Triplins Lane To Azerley Carriageway 3b Harrogate Azerley C371 – part of existing Lodge 33,708.15 scheme Additional site identified LGF

Carriageway 4b Harrogate How Hill Road Markington C374 – part of existing Funding 16,008.00 scheme Additional site identified LGF

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Fountains Lane Markington C374 – part of existing Funding 9,972.00 scheme Additional site identified

Carriageway 3b Harrogate Knaresborough Road Littlethorpe C377 – part of existing 18,029.34 scheme Additional site identified

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Old Chapel Close Harrogate U1298 – part of existing 708.00 scheme Additional site identified

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Youngs Drive Harrogate U1300 – part of existing 3,925.44 scheme Additional site identified

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Evelyn Court Harrogate U1301 – part of existing 2,526.48 scheme Additional site identified

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Penny Pot Gardens Harrogate U1302 – part of existing 2,651.76 scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/19

Additional site identified

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Birk Crag Court Harrogate U1303 – part of existing 1,670.40 scheme Additional site identified

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Long Crag View Harrogate U1304 – part of existing 2,693.52 scheme

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Hutton Conyers Village Hutton Conyers U1756 New scheme identified 4,975.68 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Cana Lane Marton Le Moor U2670 7,750.80 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Hutts Lane Grewelthorpe U2729 15,446.16 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Triplins Lane Sutton Grange U2747 16,685.40 New scheme identified LGF Carriageway 4b Harrogate Brackenthwaite Lane Pannal U2857 40,740.00 Funding New scheme identified LGF Carriageway 4a Harrogate Moor Lane Coneythorpe U2916 20,555.40 Funding Horsley Gate To Gilman New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Aldfield U2946 Wood 13,875.96 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Wendy Avenue Ripon U3006 1,342.20 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Whitcliffe Grove Ripon U3061 2,299.80 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Whitcliffe Crescent Ripon U3062 3,673.20 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Mallard Walk Boroughbridge U3440 2,253.36 New scheme identified Carriageway 4b Harrogate Ashbourne Close Boroughbridge U3504 792.36

Carriageway 4b Harrogate Breary Flat Lane Knaresborough U931 New scheme identified 12,298.32

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/20

Resurfacing

Road Allocation Category Area Town Address Estimate Comments number Oct 15

Moor Road Knayton Additional scheme Carriageway 4b Hambleton U1824 59,362.50 due to deterioration Replaces New Road Boroughbridge Road Knaresborough Carriageway 2 Harrogate A6055 46,080.00 Allerton Park Sections Additional Scheme Queen Street Scarborough Carriageway 3b Scarborough U746 61,125.00 Due To Deterioration Selby Road Riccall LGF LGF Carriageway 4a Selby Scheme Riccall C441 200,000.00 Extra £5m LGF fund Funding Newlands West Lutton LGF Carriageway 4a Ryedale LGF Scheme West Lutton C359 250,000.00 Extra £5m LGF fund Funding Hornby to Appleton LGF Wiske to East Rounton Funding Carriageway 4a Hambleton LGF Scheme Appleton Wiske C1 250,000.00 Extra £5m LGF fund Brompton/Danby Wiske LGF Carriageway 4a Hambleton LGF Scheme Brompton C4 430,000.00 Extra £5m LGF fund Funding Brodes Lane Arncliffe LGF Carriageway 4b Craven LGF Scheme Arncliffe C394 150,000.00 Extra £5m LGF fund Funding

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/21

Previously Agreed Schemes for Exclusion from 2016/17 Capital Programme APPENDIX 2.1

Surface Dressing Removals

District Road Comment Allocation Category Town Address No Estimate Oct 15 Replaced by higher Hambleton Sutton Road Thirsk Carriageway 2 A170 88,093 priority scheme Staddle Bridge To Replaced by higher Hambleton Ingleby Cross Carr Staddle Bridge priority scheme Carriageway 2 Bridge A172 63,088 Ingleby Cross Carr Replaced by higher Hambleton Bridge To Black Horse Ingleby Cross priority scheme Carriageway 2 Lane A172 119,117 Cricket Field Traffic Replaced by higher Hambleton Circus To Strikes Stokesley priority scheme Carriageway 2 Roundabout A172 37,952 Strikes Roundabout To Replaced by higher Hambleton Great Ayton Carriageway 2 Yarm Lane A172 101,792 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Pannierman Lane Newby Carriageway 2 A172 22,821 priority scheme Angel Cottages To Replaced by higher Hambleton Tollerton Carriageway 2 Demesne Farm A19 85,805 priority scheme Harrogate Harrogate Road Leathley Complete 15/16 Carriageway 2 A658 37,282 Thirsk To Scarborough Replaced by higher Ryedale Sproxton Carriageway 2 Road A170 68,724 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Station Road Topcliffe Carriageway 3a A167 150,415 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Oaktree Hill Brompton Carriageway 3a A167 62,700 priority scheme Cricket Field Traffic Replaced by higher Hambleton Stokesley Carriageway 3a Circus To Levensdale A173 28,546 priority scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/22

Levensdale To Sewage Replaced by higher Hambleton Stokesley Carriageway 3a Works A173 29,836 priority scheme Levenside To Sewage Replaced by higher Hambleton Great Ayton Carriageway 3a Works A173 24,652 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Leeming Lane Burniston Carriageway 3a A6055 213,099 priority scheme Theakston Grange To Replaced by higher Hambleton Londonderry Carriageway 3a Leases Bridge A6055 154,665 priority scheme Howden Bridge To Replaced by higher Hambleton Ainderby Steeple Carriageway 3a Ainderby Steeple A684 68,772 priority scheme Remove - Not Suitable Harrogate Farnley Lane Farnley To Surface Dress Carriageway 3a B6451 25,023 Remove - Not Suitable Harrogate Brame Lane Fewston To Surface Dress Carriageway 3a B6451 46,797 Pannierman Lane To Replaced by higher Hambleton Great Ayton Carriageway 3b County Boundary A172 5,568 priority scheme Chop Gate To Replaced by higher Hambleton Chop Gate Carriageway 3b Fangdale Beck B1257 129,538 priority scheme Seave Green To Chop Replaced by higher Hambleton Chop Gate Carriageway 3b Gate B1257 12,121 priority scheme Clay Bank To Seave Replaced by higher Hambleton Chop Gate Carriageway 3b Green B1257 75,240 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Clay Bank Great Broughton Carriageway 3b B1257 34,756 priority scheme High Entercommon To Replaced by higher Hambleton Hornby Carriageway 3b Dales Farm B1264 48,791 priority scheme Dales Farm To Replaced by higher Hambleton Hornby Carriageway 3b Fardeanside B1264 50,270 priority scheme West Lynn To Replaced by higher Hambleton Hornby Carriageway 3b Fardeanside B1264 29,471 priority scheme Worsall Toll Bar To Replaced by higher Hambleton High Worsall Carriageway 3b West Lynn B1264 23,217 priority scheme Great Ayton To Tree Replaced by higher Hambleton Great Ayton Carriageway 3b Bridge B1292 39,367 priority scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/23

Brandsby Bank To Replaced by higher Hambleton Brandsby Carriageway 3b District Boundary B1363 20,472 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Thirsk Road Stokesley Carriageway 3b B1365 26,005 priority scheme Strikes Roundabout To Replaced by higher Hambleton Stokesley Carriageway 3b Tanton Bridge B1365 30,024 priority scheme Tanton Bridge To Replaced by higher Hambleton Tanton Carriageway 3b County Boundary B1365 50,823 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Masham Road Bedale Carriageway 3b B6268 16,093 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Sussex Street Bedale Carriageway 3b B6268 6,642 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Yafforth Road Northallerton Carriageway 3b B6271 79,093 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Enterpen Hutton Rudby Carriageway 3b C1 14,085 priority scheme Hutton Rudby To Tame Replaced by higher Hambleton Skutterskelfe Carriageway 3b Bridge C1 58,091 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Coxwold Village Street Coxwold Carriageway 3b C88 8,049 priority scheme Shipton By Replaced by higher Hambleton High Moor Lane Carriageway 3b Beningbrough C92 15,942 priority scheme Remove - Not Suitable Carriageway 3b Harrogate Knaresborough Road North Deighton B6164 17,432 To Surface Dress Replaced by higher Harrogate Burn Bridge Lane Burn Bridge Carriageway 3b C258 19,540 priority scheme

Carriageway 3b Harrogate Copgrove Lane Farnham C264 41,922 Replaced by higher

priority scheme

Replaced by higher Carriageway 3b Harrogate Low Moor Lane Scotton C265 17,222 priority scheme Replaced by higher Harrogate Wath Lane Copgrove Carriageway 3b C377 24,254 priority scheme Undercliffe To Replaced by higher Ryedale Pickering Carriageway 3b Newbridge C66 23,862 priority scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/24

Cow Wath Bank To Scarborough Goathland Complete 15/16 Carriageway 3b Bracken Howe C82 73,505 War Memorial To Cow Addition SD completed Scarborough Goathland Carriageway 3b Wath Bridge C82 19,975 15/16 War Memorial To Hunt Addition SD completed Scarborough Goathland Carriageway 3b House Road C82 18,499 15/16 Replaced by higher Hambleton Gatenby Village Gatenby Carriageway 4a C115 16,973 priority scheme Gatenby To Raf Replaced by higher Hambleton Gatenby Carriageway 4a Leeming C115 7,179 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton The Avenue Snape Carriageway 4a C52 9,047 priority scheme Quarry Top To Belford Harrogate Laverton Complete 12/13 Carriageway 4a Lane C372 19,705 Marton Cum Reprioritise for future Harrogate Thorny Hill Lane Carriageway 4a Grafton U3405 9,857 year Include Surrounding Roads - May Need Carriageway 4a Harrogate Swan Road Harrogate U766 4,258 Delaying Until After

Redevelopment Of Crescent Gardens Dark Lane To Badger Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Westow Carriageway 4a Bank C181 25,157 priority scheme Funding Birdsall To Leavening Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Birdsall Carriageway 4a Brow C351 3,536 priority scheme Funding Replaced by higher Ryedale Gillamoor Road Kirkbymoorside Carriageway 4a C60 18,603 priority scheme Bransdale Road To Replaced by higher Ryedale Cockayne Carriageway 4a Cockayne C60 25,772 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Thorn Wath Lane Church Houses Carriageway 4a C62 13,323 priority scheme Kirby Misperton To Replaced by higher Ryedale Kirby Misperton LGF Carriageway 4a Little Barugh C65 13,022 priority scheme Funding Replaced by higher New Bridge To Blansby Carriageway 4a Ryedale Thornton Le Dale C66 16,228 priority scheme Park Lane

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/25

Replaced by higher Ryedale Yatts Road Pickering Carriageway 4a C66 29,393 priority scheme Thornton Dale To Fox Replaced by higher Ryedale Thornton Le Dale Carriageway 4a And Rabbit Farm C67 33,423 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale High Street Lockton Carriageway 4a C67 5,438 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Mill Bank Road Lockton Carriageway 4a C67 10,775 priority scheme Main Street To Mill Replaced by higher Ryedale Levisham Carriageway 4a Bank Road C67 12,164 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale High Street Lockton Carriageway 4a C67 4,865 priority scheme Butterwick To Fosters Replaced by higher Ryedale Butterwick Carriageway 4a Wold Plantation C72 13,008 priority scheme Oswaldkirk To Replaced by higher Ryedale Oswaldkirk Carriageway 4a Ampleforth C88 52,020 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Main Street Oswaldkirk Carriageway 4a C88 11,644 priority scheme Road From Sheriff Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Hutton To Skegmer Sheriff Hutton priority scheme Funding Carriageway 4a Lane C91 39,750 Road From Holbeck Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Stonegrave Carriageway 4a Bridge To The Avenue C97 15,169 priority scheme Funding Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale The Avenue Nunnington Carriageway 4a C97 17,701 priority scheme Funding Replaced by higher Ryedale Riccal Moor Lane Harome Carriageway 4a C97 15,254 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale High Street Harome Carriageway 4a C97 17,058 priority scheme Helmsley To Harome Replaced by higher Ryedale Helmsley Carriageway 4a Road C97 31,539 priority scheme Craven West Street Gargrave Complete 15/16 Carriageway 4b U1919 5,462 Complete 15/16 Craven North Street Gargrave Carriageway 4b U1922 2,197

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/26

Complete 15/16 Craven Walton Avenue Gargrave Carriageway 4b U1925 1,461 Complete 15/16 Craven Riversway Gargrave Carriageway 4b U1926 2,168 Complete 15/16 Craven Marton Close Gargrave Carriageway 4b U1961 1,022 Complete 15/16 Craven Higherlands Close Gargrave Carriageway 4b U1968 2,448 Complete 15/16 Craven Green Way Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2405 5,956 Complete 15/16 Craven Black Abbey Lane Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2406 2,671 Complete 15/16 Craven Ryecroft Way Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2407 1,503 Complete 15/16 Craven Mayfield Close Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2408 727 Complete 15/16 Craven Hoppss Road Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2415 779 Complete 15/16 Craven Beanlands Place Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2416 965 Complete 15/16 Craven Washburn Drive Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2417 1,190 Complete 15/16 Craven Valley View Glusburn Carriageway 4b U2528 1,426 Complete 15/16 Craven Walton Close Gargrave Carriageway 4b U2647 990 Ingleby Greenhow To Replaced by higher Hambleton Ingleby Greenhow Carriageway 4b Clay Bank C160 25,050 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Lambs Lane Ingleby Greenhow Carriageway 4b C160 17,175 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Back Lane Tholthorpe Carriageway 4b U1618 1,553 priority scheme Replaced by higher Carriageway 4b Hambleton Raisdale Road Chop Gate U1777 16,120 priority scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/27

Carlton-In- Replaced by higher Hambleton Alum House Lane Carriageway 4b Cleveland U1777 11,290 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Percy Cross Rigg Kildale Carriageway 4b U1842 13,890 priority scheme Ingleby Cross Scarth Replaced by higher Hambleton Ingleby Cross Carriageway 4b Lees Diversion U1972 7,884 priority scheme Replaced by higher Hambleton Maunby Village Street Maunby Carriageway 4b U2217 6,638 priority scheme Remove - Surface Harrogate Woodruff Close Harrogate Carriageway 4b U1097 1,170 Dressed In 2015 Busy Industrial And Retail Location Will Harrogate Grimbald Crag Road Knaresborough Not Be Suitable For Carriageway 4b U1104 7,239 SD Busy Industrial And Retail Location Will Harrogate Grimbald Crag Link Knaresborough Not Be Suitable For Carriageway 4b U1104 2,390 SD Busy Industrial And Retail Location Will Harrogate Grimbald Crag Close Knaresborough Not Be Suitable For Carriageway 4b U1314 7,819 SD Harrogate Carline Mead Harrogate Complete 15/16 Carriageway 4b U130 695 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Trefoil Drive Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1390 5,782 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Primrose Close Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1391 1,115 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Orchid Way Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1392 1,162 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Stonecrop Avenue Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1393 2,479 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Coltsfoot Court Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1394 980 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Buttercup Close Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1395 773

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/28

Complete 15/16 Harrogate Penny Royal Close Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1396 547 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Angelica Close Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1398 1,021 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Clover Way Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1400 2,849 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Bramble Close Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1401 813 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Oakridge View Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1402 1,334 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Foxglove Close Harrogate Carriageway 4b U1403 594 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Cornflower Way Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1404 2,021 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Cranesbill Close Killinghall Carriageway 4b U1405 1,124 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Columbine Grove Harrogate Carriageway 4b U171 1,575 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Comfrey Close Harrogate Carriageway 4b U172 1,245 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Cornel Rise Harrogate Carriageway 4b U182 738 Replaced by higher Harrogate Staupes Road High Birstwith Carriageway 4b U2838 9,527 priority scheme Harrogate Gentian Glade Harrogate Complete 15/16 Carriageway 4b U296 1,253 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Juniper Way Harrogate Carriageway 4b U399 1,813 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Barberry Close Harrogate Carriageway 4b U52 1,989 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Saffron Meadow Harrogate Carriageway 4b U669 942 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Sallow Heath Harrogate Carriageway 4b U671 456

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/29

Complete 15/16 Harrogate Saltergate Drive Harrogate Carriageway 4b U672 8,869 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Sorrel Grove Harrogate Carriageway 4b U685 717 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Speedwell Glade Harrogate Carriageway 4b U695 1,134 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Stone Bramble Harrogate Carriageway 4b U750 912 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Sundew Heath Harrogate Carriageway 4b U764 421 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Sweet Briar Harrogate Carriageway 4b U768 1,785 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Teasel Grove Harrogate Carriageway 4b U775 1,216 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Winter Green Harrogate Carriageway 4b U863 421 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Bluebell Meadow Harrogate Carriageway 4b U89 1,912 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Yarrow Drive Harrogate Carriageway 4b U891 5,892 Complete 15/16 Harrogate Borage Road Harrogate Carriageway 4b U92 1,616 Replaced by higher Harrogate Byards Park Knaresborough Carriageway 4b U935 1,838 priority scheme Sand Hutton To Bossall Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Buttercrambe Carriageway 4b Road C176 5,231 priority scheme Funding Nunnington To East Replaced by higher Ryedale Nunnington Carriageway 4b Ness C180 6,946 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Marton Road Sinnington Carriageway 4b C195 23,411 priority scheme Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Butterwick Road Barton Le Street Carriageway 4b C230 12,924 priority scheme Funding Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Green Lane Butterwick Carriageway 4b C230 8,640 priority scheme Funding

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/30

Newstead House To Replaced by higher Ryedale Settrington LGF Carriageway 4b Back Lane C350 34,524 priority scheme Funding Replaced by higher Ryedale Stape Road Stape Carriageway 4b C66 13,788 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Back Side Duggleby Carriageway 4b U1795 4,212 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Rectory Lane Nunnington Carriageway 4b U18 4,098 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Foston Lane Foston Carriageway 4b U1845 11,725 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Heygate Bank Rosedale Abbey Carriageway 4b U2265 13,824 priority scheme Terrington To Bulmer Replaced by higher LGF Ryedale Ganthorpe Carriageway 4b Road U253 12,240 priority scheme Funding Replaced by higher Ryedale Daleside Road Cockayne Carriageway 4b U29 43,692 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Village Street Cockayne Carriageway 4b U30 1,128 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Thorn Wath Lane Church Houses Carriageway 4b U34 360 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Daleside Road Farndale West Carriageway 4b U34 39,696 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Mill Street Rosedale Abbey Carriageway 4b U3451 2,544 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Back Lane Rosedale Abbey Carriageway 4b U3452 2,928 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Daleside Road Church Houses Carriageway 4b U35 38,532 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Back Lane Lockton Carriageway 4b U3548 3,708 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Daleside Road Farndale East Carriageway 4b U38 38,172 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Waste Lane Low Mill Carriageway 4b U39 5,088 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Salents Lane Duggleby Carriageway 4b U468 21,710 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Baxtons Road Helmsley Carriageway 4b U47 35,388 priority scheme NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/31

Replaced by higher Ryedale Fother Dale Thixendale Carriageway 4b U502 25,956 priority scheme Replaced by higher Ryedale Thixendale Road Thixendale Carriageway 4b U504 24,804 priority scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/32

R & R Removals

District Road Comment Allocation Category Town Address No Estimate Oct 15 Replaced by higher Harrogate New Road Allerton Park Carriageway 2 A59 46,080 priority scheme Landslip area - Richmond To Richmondshire Richmond surfacing scheme not Downholme Carriageway 3a A6108 18,750 suitable A1 upgrade, review Richmondshire Barracks Bank Scotch Corner after completion Carriageway 3a A6108 72,848 Ruswarp Scarborough Sandsend Complete 15/16 Carriageway 3a Roundabout A171 72,215 Carriageway 3a Scarborough Guisborough Road Whitby A171 72,215 Complete 15/16 Masham Bridge To Replaced by higher Hambleton Masham Carriageway 4a High Burton C31 5,625 priority scheme Richmond To Marske Replaced by higher Richmondshire Marske priority scheme Carriageway 4a Road U943 11,250 East Moor To Ryedale Helmsley Complete 15/16 Carriageway 4a Cockayne U28 36,000 Potters Side Lane To Replaced by higher Scarborough Commondale Carriageway 4a Sleddale Bridge C1 13,050 priority scheme Replaced by higher Scarborough Dibble Bridge Bank Castleton Carriageway 4a C155 11,250 priority scheme Harlow Bush To Replaced by higher Scarborough Danby Carriageway 4a White Cross C21 11,250 priority scheme Replaced by higher Scarborough Broom House Lane Ugthorpe Carriageway 4a C80 31,500 priority scheme Egton Lane To Replaced by higher Scarborough Guisborough Road Egton priority scheme Carriageway 4a C82 13,500 Carriageway 4a Selby Went Edge Road Kirk Smeaton C344 27,000 Complete 15/16 Girsby To Over Hambleton Over Dinsdale Complete 15/16 Carriageway 4b Dinsdale C254 21,000

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/33

Nutwith Lane To Replaced by higher Harrogate Grewelthorpe Carriageway 4b Mousecarr U2182 21,000 priority scheme Fountains Earth Replaced by higher Harrogate Fountains Earth Carriageway 4b Road U2964 19,000 priority scheme Replaced by higher Richmondshire Gandale Camp Catterick Garrison Carriageway 4b U1170 51,600 priority scheme

Catterick Airfield A1 upgrade, review Richmondshire Catterick Village Roundabout after completion Carriageway 4b U1405 23,625 Lane To High Richmondshire Widdale Complete 15/16 Carriageway 4b Houses U196 4,500 No surfacing required - Newbiggin To Flow Richmondshire Newbiggin SD only - culvert Edge Carriageway 4b U241 1,800 repairs only This is an unsurfaced Northallerton Road Richmondshire Worton layby - scheme not To Kendal Road Carriageway 4b U2804 6,000 required. Complete 15/16 Ryedale Martin Holme Thixendale Carriageway 4b U500 16,800

Footway Removals

District Road Comment Type Category Town Address No Estimate Ryedale Castle Howard Road Malton Complete 13/14 R&R 5 C172 5,840

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/34

Cattle grid, Special, Drainage, Landslip Removals

District Road Comment Type Category Town Address No Estimate Cancelled due to a Ryedale Pasture Lane Malton Development realigning Special 3b U341 73,500 the road Cattle Selby Whitecoates Lane South Milford Complete 15/16 Grid 4a C320 35,000 Ordered in 2015/16 as Carlton-In- Hambleton Alum House Lane collapsed during R & R Cattle Cleveland Grid 4b U1777 6,500 scheme Eller Stang Bridge Scarborough Castleton Complete 15/16 Drainage 4a To Winsley Hill C1 10,000 Drainage 4b Ryedale Thorpe Lane Ampleforth C174 60,000 Complete 15/16 Landslip 4b Ryedale Daleside Road Rosedale East U3448 20,000 Complete 15/16 Replaced by higher Scarborough Westerdaleside Westerdale Landslip 4b U2241 40,000 priority scheme

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/35

Applications of Funding Statement 2016/17 and 2017/18 APPENDIX 3

2016/17 2017/18 APPLICATION OF FUNDING £ £ Total Budget Available 40,539 38,850 Integrated Transport 1,130 1,130

Structural Highway Maintenance 29,904 27,454 Street-lighting 800 800

Bridges and Structures 2,060 2,060

Sub-total 33,894 31,444

Residual Budget to be Allocated 6,645 7,406

Highway Maintenance Top Slice (inc Fees, Prelims and Asset 7,585 7,373 Management) 814 - A174 Sandsend EA Project Expenditure Pre-planning application advice contribution 34 34

Carry – forward schemes from 2015/16 800

Remaining to be Allocated -2,588 -1

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/36

APPENDIX 4

2016/17 Street Lighting Programme

Area Location Cost

Area 2 Easingwold £24,000

Scarborough £200,000 Area 3

Whitby £40,000

Area 5 Skipton £150,000 Harrogate & Area 6 Knaresborough £300,000

All Areas Miscellaneous £86,000

TOTAL £800,000

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/37

Structural Highway Maintenance – Capital Allocations 2017/18 Appendix 5

Funding 17/18 LTP Block Allocations £M Estimated IT Funding 1.130 Estimated IT LTP Block Allocation (Transferred to Structural 1.893 Highway Maintenance) Indicative Maintenance ‘Needs based’ LTP Block Allocation 26.359 Indicative ‘Incentive Element’ LTP Block Allocation (assume 2.468 Band 3) Challenge Fund 0 Additional Government Funding Dft Winter Damage Fund 0 Dft Severe Weather Recovery Fund 0 Dft Pothole Fund 0 Local Growth Fund 5.000 Additional NYCC Funding NYCC LGF Match Funding 2.000 Transfer and capitalisation of Flood Risk Management works 0 budget

Total 38.850

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/38

Structural Highway Maintenance – Capital Allocations 2017/18

Budget Available 38,850,000 Asset Related Capital Projects Carriageway Network Condition Surveys 215,000 Traffic Data Collection 70,000 Carriageway & Footway Whole of Govt Accounts Report 6,000 HMEP Lifecycle Planning Toolkit 10,000 North Yorkshire Strategic Traffic Model 10,000 Pre-Design Site Investigation 100,000 Highway Culvert Inspections (600-900mm dia) 10,000 Highway Drainage Infrastructure Inspections 20,000 Bridges & Structures Inspections (General, Principal and Dived) 260,000 Pre-Planning Application Advice 33,600 Sub-Total for Asset Related Capital Projects 734,600

Remaining Budget 38,115,400

Management Budgets NYCC Recharge 3,632,000 Consultants Design and Supervision Fees 1,000,000 Bridges & Structures 2,060,000

Remaining Budget 31,423,400

Contract Related Budgets HMC 2012 Preliminaries (assumed 7%) 2,055,737

Works Budget 29,367,663

Asset Related Works Programmes Road Lighting 800,000 Integrated Transport 1,130,000 Structural Highway Maintenance 27,206,822

Structural Highway Maintenance – Headline Allocations 27,437,663

Additional Cat 4 Carriageway 7,000,000 Standard Scheme Identification Methodology 20,437,663

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/39

Standard Scheme Identification Methodology cont. 20,437,663

Footway Programmes Cat 1a, 1, 2 Footway Schemes 400,000 Patching Cat 1a, 1, 2 Footways 100,000 Cat 3, 4, 5 Footway Schemes 1,000,000 Surface Treatment of Cat 3, 4, 5 Footways 520,000 Patching Cat 3, 4, 5 Footways 125,000

Cycleways and Cycletracks Schemes 60,000

Street Furniture Vehicle Restraint Systems 300,000 Cattle Grids 200,000

Sub-total 2,705,000

Works Budget available for Carriageways 17,732,663

Cat 6 (UURs) 100,000

Special Engineering Schemes – Drainage 600,000 Special Engineering Schemes – Slope Stabilisation 600,000 Special Engineering Schemes – Lay-bys, Block paved areas etc. 600,000

Carriageway sub-total 1,900,000

Budget Available for Carriageway Pavement Works (Schemes, 15,832,663 Surface Treatment and Patching).

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/40

APPENDIX 6 £000s Proposed Integrated Transport Capital Programme 2017/18

Countywide Accident Investigation 400

Area 1 Signs Lines and TRO’s 36

Area 2 Signs Lines and TRO’s 44

Area 3 Signs Lines and TRO’s 66 Area 4 Signs Lines and TRO’s 36

Area 5 Signs Lines and TRO’s 31 Area 6 Signs Lines and TRO’s 71 Area 7 Signs Lines and TRO’s 36

Countywide Traffic Signal Control 250

Countywide Community Infrastructure Levy 25

Countywide Local Accessibility Funding 35 Countywide Parking Management 100

Subtotal 1,130

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/41

Annex 1

Estimated Highway Maintenance Capital Allocations

2016/17 to 2020/21

Funding 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 Total LTP Block Allocations Estimated IT LTP Block Allocation Transferred to Maintenance 1.893 1.893 1.893 1.893 1.893 £9.465

Indicative Maintenance 'Needs' LTP Block Allocation 27.182 26.359 23.858 23.858 23.858 £125.115 Incentive Block Allocation* 1.645 2.468 4.969 4.969 4.969 £19.020 Challenge Fund** 0 0 Unknown Unknown Unknown - Additional Government Funding DfT Winter Damage Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 DfT Severe Weather Recovery Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 DfT Pothole Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 Provisional Local Growth Fund 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 4.000 £24.000 Additional NYCC Funding Proposed NYCC LGF Match Funding 2.000 2.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 £8.000

Total £37.720 £37.720 £37.720 £36.720 £35.720 £185.600 All Figures £M *Assumes Band 3 **Challenge Fund 18/19 – 20/21 is likely to be allocated by Dft in year 17/18

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/42

Annex 2 Initial equality impact assessment screening form (As of October 2015 this form replaces ‘Record of decision not to carry out an EIA’)

This form records an equality screening process to determine the relevance of equality to a proposal, and a decision whether or not a full EIA would be appropriate or proportionate. Directorate BES Service area H&T Proposal being screened BES Executive Member Report – Highways Capital Programme 2016/17.

Officer(s) carrying out screening Neil Leighton What are you proposing to do? Seek BES Executive Members agreement for changes to the Highways Capital Programme for Street Lighting, Bridges and Structures, Integrated Transport and Structural Highway Maintenance for 2016/17 and for 2017/18 headline allocations Why are you proposing this? What are the Approval to spend the Highways Capital Budget on desired outcomes? identified schemes.

Does the proposal involve a significant Yes- IRO £40million of Capital funding. commitment or removal of resources? Please give details. Is there likely to be an adverse impact on people with any of the following protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYCC’s additional agreed characteristics? As part of this assessment, please consider the following questions:  To what extent is this service used by particular groups of people with protected characteristics?  Does the proposal relate to functions that previous consultation has identified as important?  Do different groups have different needs or experiences in the area the proposal relates to?

If for any characteristic it is considered that there is likely to be a significant adverse impact or you have ticked ‘Don’t know/no info available’, then a full EIA should be carried out where this is proportionate. You are advised to speak to your Equality rep for advice if you are in any doubt.

Protected characteristic Yes No Don’t know/No info available Age  Disability  Sex (Gender)  Race  Sexual orientation  Gender reassignment  Religion or belief  Pregnancy or maternity  Marriage or civil partnership  NYCC additional characteristic People in rural areas  People on a low income  Carer (unpaid family or friend)  NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/43

Does the proposal relate to an area where there are known inequalities/probable No impacts (e.g. disabled people’s access to public transport)? Please give details. Will the proposal have a significant effect The report is for approval to spend the on how other organisations operate? (e.g. overarching capital maintenance funding, not partners, funding criteria, etc.). Do any of individual scheme funding. these organisations support people with protected characteristics? Please explain why you have reached this conclusion. Decision (Please tick one option) EIA not  Continue to full relevant or EIA: proportionate: Reason for decision The allocation of funding is based on the “manage, maintain and improve” (MMI) hierarchy set out in Local Transport Plan 3, which has been the subject of an Equality Impact Assessment (EIA). This concluded that the introduction of fewer improvement schemes may have a greater impact on people with mobility difficulties or without access to a private vehicle as there will be fewer new facilities provided e.g. pedestrian crossings, dropped kerbs, bus stop accessibility improvements; however, it is also considered that prioritising maintenance, particularly for footways, through the MMI hierarchy is likely to produce a net benefit for people with the same protected characteristics; particularly in terms of age and disability.

Signed (Assistant Director or equivalent) David Bowe

Date 21 January 2016

NYCC – 4 February 2016 – Executive Members Highways Capital Programme 2016/17/44