DOCSLIB.ORG

Highway Rock Cut Inventory and Failure Potential, Allegany County, Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highway Rock Cut Inventory and Failure Potential, Allegany County, Maryland SPR-Part B MD-20-P01837 G-1 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH REPORT Highway Rock Cut Inventory and Failure Potential, Allegany County, Maryland David K. Brezinski Rebecca Kavage Adams Elizabeth R. Sylvia Maryland Geological Survey Maryland Department of Natural Resources FINAL REPORT May 2020 This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under the State Planning and Research program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration or the Maryland Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. MD-20-P01873G-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date May 11, 2020 Highway Rock Cut Inventory and Failure Potential, 6. Performing Organization Code Allegany County, Maryland 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. David K. Brezinski, Ph.D., Rebecca Kavage Adams, Elizabeth Sylvia DNR 12-041720-227 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Maryland Geological Survey 2300 St. Paul Street 11. Contract or Grant No. Baltimore, Maryland 21218 SP809B4F 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Maryland Department of Transportation (SPR) SPR-B Final Report State Highway Administration (May 14, 2018-May 11, 2020) Office of Policy & Research 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore MD 21202 14. Sponsoring Agency Code (7120) STMD - MDOT/SHA 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract One hundred ninety-five, MDOT SHA-maintained, roadway embankments in Allegany County, Maryland, were cataloged as to the effects of climate, vegetation, and geology factors on slope stability. Observations included dimensions, weathering condition, and geologic structure. Recorded data was employed to evaluated the potential for slope failure such as rockfall, rock roll, rockslide, or slumping. Rockfalls were determined to be likely on slopes of greater than 60 degrees, and in massive lithologies on embankments displaying major levels of differential erosion. Rock roll was the most common potential slope failure on slopes that exceed 30 degrees of inclination. Rockslides were considered to be the dominant potential slope failure in outcrops where rock layering is inclined towards the highway. Roadside slumping or rotational dislocations were a prominent type of slope failure in highly weathered, relatively unconsolidated, rock outcrops. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Rockfalls, Translational landslides, Rockslides, This document is available from the Research Rotational landslides, Roadway embankments. Division upon request. 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price None None 36 pages Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized Department of Natural Resources Resource Assessment Service MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard A. Ortt, Jr., Director HIGHWAY ROCKCUT INVENTORY AND SLOPE FAILURE POTENTIAL, ALLEGANY COUNTY, MARYLAND by David K. Brezinski Rebecca Kavage Adams Elizabeth R. Sylvia DNR Publication No. DNR 12-041720-227 May 2020 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Location and Physiography .................................................................................................................. 3 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................................................. 5 Previous Study ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Roadway Embankment Failure Survey ....................................................................................................... 7 Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Survey123 ............................................................................................................................................. 9 General Survey Elements ..................................................................................................................... 9 Slope Information .......................................................................................................................... 9 Benches and Catchment ................................................................................................................. 9 Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Water on Exposure ....................................................................................................................... 13 Slope Vegetation .......................................................................................................................... 14 Type of Hazard ............................................................................................................................ 16 Geology Survey Elements ................................................................................................................. 16 Failure Plane Character ................................................................................................................ 16 Rock Friction ............................................................................................................................... 17 Differential Erosion ..................................................................................................................... 18 Weathering Characteristics .......................................................................................................... 19 Stratification ................................................................................................................................. 20 Lithology ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Site Specific Outcrop Survey Utilizing Areal Drone Imagery ........................................................... 24 Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Advantages ................................................................................................................................... 24 Disadvantages .............................................................................................................................. 24 Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Evaluation of Survey Geology Elements ........................................................................................... 27 Geology Factors Summary ................................................................................................................. 32 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................... 33 References ................................................................................................................................................. 34 List of Figures Figure 1. LiDAR location Map ................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Bedrock stratigraphy and Structure of Allegany County, Maryland ........................................... 5 Figure 3. ESRI Survey123 data collection form ......................................................................................... 8 Figure 4. Embankment Characterization .................................................................................................. 10 Figure 5 Benches and Catchments ............................................................................................................ 11 Figure 6. Maryland Precipitation and Freeze/Thaw Durations ................................................................ 12 Figure 7. Water from Exposure................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 8. North-South-Facing Vegetation ................................................................................................ 14 Figure 9. Types of Vegetation .................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 10. Type of Slope Failure .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin
    DOE/NETL-2011/1478 A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors greatly thank Daniel J. Soeder (U.S. Department of Energy) who kindly reviewed the manuscript. His criticisms, suggestions, and support significantly improved the content, and we are deeply grateful. Cover. Top left: The Barnett Shale exposed on the Llano uplift near San Saba, Texas. Top right: The Marcellus Shale exposed in the Valley and Ridge Province near Keyser, West Virginia. Photographs by Kathy R. Bruner, U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Bottom: Horizontal Marcellus Shale well in Greene County, Pennsylvania producing gas at 10 million cubic feet per day at about 3,000 pounds per square inch.
    [Show full text]
  • Columnals (PDF)
    2248 22482 2 4 V. INDEX OF COLUMNALS 8 Remarks: In this section the stratigraphic range given under the genus is the compiled range of all named species based solely on columnals assigned to the genus. It should be noted that this range may and often differs considerably from the range given under the same genus in Section I, because that range is based on species identified on cups or crowns. All other abbreviations and format follow that of Section I. Generic names followed by the type species are based on columnals. Genera, not followed by the type species, are based on cups and crowns as given in Section I. There are a number of unlisted columnal taxa from the literature that are indexed as genera recognized on cups and crowns. Bassler and Moodey (1943) did not index columnal taxa that were not new names or identified genera with the species unnamed. I have included some of the omissions of Bassler and Moodey, but have not made a search of the extensive literature specifically for the omitted citations because of time constraints. Many of these unlisted taxa are illustrated in the early state surveys of the eastern and central United States. Many of the columnal species assigned to genera based on cups or crowns are incorrect assignments. An uncertain, but significant, number of the columnal genera are synonyms of other columnal genera as they are based on different parts of the stem of a single taxon. Also a number of the columnal genera are synonyms of genera based on cups and crowns as they come from more distal parts of the stem not currently known to be associated with the cup or crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Spirit Leveling in Maryland 1896 to 1911, Inclusive
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR f . BTJIAETIN 563 t RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING IN MARYLAND 1896 TO 1911, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Work done in cooperation with the State through the Maryland Geological Survey William Bullock Clark, State Geologist WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction. ............................................................... 5 Cooperation.......................................................... 6 Previous publication................... : ...........................".. 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification......................................................... 5 Bench marks......................................................... 6 Datum............................................................... 6 Topographic maps.................................................... 7 Precise.leveling.......................................................... 8 Washington quadrangle (Montgomery County)........................... 8 Primary leveling......................................................... 10 Barclay, Betterton, Cecilton, Chestertown, Choptank (30/), Crapo, Cris- field, Deal Island, Denton, Dover (3(X), Drum Point, Harrington, Hur- lock, Nanticoke, Ocean City, Oxford, Pittsville, Princess Anne, Salis­ bury, Seaford, Snow Hill, St. Michaels, and Tolchester (3(X) quadrangles (Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Annes, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomicp, and Worcester
    [Show full text]
  • Road Log of the Geology of Frederick County, Virginia W
    Vol. 17 MAY, 1971 No. 2 ROAD LOG OF THE GEOLOGY OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA W. E. Nunan The following road log is a guide to geologic The user of this road log should keep in mind features along or near main roads in Frederick that automobile odometers vary in accuracy. Dis- County, Virginia. Distances and cumulative mile- tances between stops and road intersections ages between places where interesting and repre- should be checked frequently, especially at junc- sentative-lithologies, formational contacts, struc- tions or stream crossings immediately preceding tural features, fossils, and geomorphic features stops. The Frederick County road map of the occur are noted. At least one exposure for nearly Virginia Department of Highways, and the U. S. each formation is included in the log. Brief dis- Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic maps cussions of the geological features observable at are recommended for use with this road log. the various stops is included in the text. Topographic maps covering Frederick County include Boyce, Capon Bridge, Capon Springs, A comprehensive report of the geology of the Glengary, Gore, Hayfield, Inwood, Middletown, Mountain Falls, Ridge, Stephens City, Stephen- County is presented in "Geology and Mineral Re- son, Wardensville, White Hall, and Winchester. sources of Frederick County" by Charles Butts The route of the road log (Figure 1) shows U. S. and R. S. Edmundson, Bulletin 80 of the Virginia and State Highways and those State Roads trav- Division of Mineral Resources. The publication eled or needed for reference at intersections. has a 1:62,500 scale geologic map in color, which Pertinent place names, streams, and railroad is available from the Division for $4.00 plus sales crossings are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • AL-III-C-143 Evitts (Evart's) Home Site
    AL-III-C-143 Evitts (Evart's) Home Site Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 12-11-2003 ,A1.--111-c....-14'3 Rocky Gap State Park MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST Evitts Home Site Evitts Creek Quad INVENTORY FORM FOR STATE HISTORIC SITES SURVEY HISTORIC Evitts Home Site AND/OR COMMON fJLOCATION STREET & NUMBER Rocky Gap State Park CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT VICINITY OF Sixth STATE COUNTY Maryland Allegany DcLAsSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT x_PUBLIC _OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE _MUSEUM -BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE --.XJNOCCUPIED _COMMERCIAL )LPARK -- _STRUCTURE -BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS _EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _XSITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE J{ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS _J(YES RESTRICTED _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC -BEING CONSIDERED _YES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION _NO _MILITARY _OTHER DOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Maryland Department of Natural Resources Telephone #: STREET & NUMBER Taylor Avenue CITY.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Achievements 2008
    Profess Achieve Cover 08:Layout 1 8/11/09 1:59 PM Page 1 F R O S T B U R G S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y In March 2008, Dr. Karen Soderberg-Sarnaker, culminating an administrative effort of nearly a year and a dream of many years, led the Frostburg State University Chamber Choir on a journey to China. There they presented a number of both planned and impromptu performances, including the one shown on the front cover on the Great Wall. Soderberg- Sarnaker was assisted on the journey by Dr. Mark Gallagher and accompanist Betty Jane Phillips, and in preparation for the trip by Yanling Fan, who ensured that the group’s pronunciation was perfect in the traditional “Usuli Boat Song.” The Chamber Choir’s trip to China, as well as a previous trip by education and geography students in January 2008 led by Dr. Ken Witmer and Dr. Hank Bullamore, helped lay the groundwork for FSU’s growing international initiatives in China. DIVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS & MEDIA RELATIONS FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY 101 BRADDOCK ROAD FROSTBURG, MD 21532-2303 COVER DESIGN: ANN TOWNSELL Professional achievements 2008 ~ ~ Frostburg State University2008 Professional Achievements This booklet highlights the many professional achievements during the past year of Frostburg State University’s diverse and talented faculty and staff. As you will see in the following pages, Frostburg’s faculty members and professional staff contribute to their fields by producing original research, creative works and performances, and scholarship in teaching and learning. Faculty and staff also engage in widespread service to their fields and in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • A2 and B2: Upper Devonian Kellwasser Extinction Events in New York and Pennsylvania: Offshore to Onshore Transect Across the F
    A2 AND B2: UPPER DEVONIAN KELLWASSER EXTINCTION EVENTS IN NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA: OFFSHORE TO ONSHORE TRANSECT ACROSS THE FRASNIAN-FAMENNIAN BOUNDARY ON THE EASTERN MARGIN OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN ANDREW M. BUSH AND J. ANDREW BEARD Geosciences & Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 GORDON BAIRD Department of Geosciences, SUNY Fredonia, Fredonia, NY 14063 D. JEFFREY OVER Department of Geological Sciences, SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454 with contributions by KATHERINE TUSKES Department of Geological Sciences, Atmospheric, Ocean, and Earth Science, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110 SARAH K. BRISSON AND JALEIGH Q. PIER Geosciences & Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 INTRODUCTION Earth-system perturbations caused a series of mass extinction events during the Devonian Period, including the Taghanic event in the Givetian, the Lower and Upper Kellwasser events in the Frasnian, and the Hangenberg event in the Famennian (House, 2002; Bambach, 2006). These extinctions occurred against the backdrop of orbitally forced sea-level fluctuations, the Acadian Orogeny (Averbuch et al., 2005), the expansion of plants and animals on land (Algeo et al., 1995), and ecological changes in the marine biosphere (Signor and Brett, 1984; Bambach, 1999). The Frasnian-Famennian boundary in particular represents a significant global crisis, considered one of the “big five” mass extinctions (Raup and Sepkoski, 1982) that led to the demise of the widespread and diverse Devonian
    [Show full text]
  • (Late Devonian) Boundary Within the Foreknobs Formation, Maryland and West Virginia
    The Frasnian-Famennian (Late Devonian) boundary within the Foreknobs Formation, Maryland and West Virginia GEORGE R. McGHEE, JR. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627 ABSTRACT The approximate position of the Frasnian-Famennian (Late De- vonian) boundary is determined within the Foreknobs Formation along the Allegheny Front in Maryland and West Virginia by utiliz- ing the time ranges of the articulate brachiopods Athryis angelica Hall, Cyrtospirifer sulcifer (Hall), and members of the Atrypidae. INTRODUCTION The age of strata previously called the "Chemung Formation" along the Allegheny Front in Maryland and West Virginia (Fig. 1) has been of interest to Devonian wokers for some time. Recent at- tempts to resolve this problem include the works of Dennison (1970, 1971) and Curry (1975). New paleontological contribu- tions to the resolution of time relations within the Greenland Gap Group ("Chemung Formation") are the object of this paper, which is an outgrowth of a much larger ecological analysis of Late Devo- nian benthic marine fauna as preserved in the central Appalachians (McGhee, 1975, 1976). STRATIGRAPHIC SETTING The following is a condensation and summary of the evolution of Upper Devonian stratigraphic nomenclatural usage in the study Figure 1. Location map of study area, showing positions of the mea- area; for a more complete and thorough discussion, the reader is sured sections used in this study (after Dennison, 1970). referred to Dennison (1970) and Kirchgessner (1973). The Chemung Formation was originally designated by James lower Cohocton Stage." Elsewhere, concerning the upper limit of Hall (1839) from Chemung Narrows in south-central New York.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKET AREA ANALYSIS* Cumberland Overview
    MARKET AREA ANALYSIS* Cumberland Overview Cumberland, officially “the City of Cumberland,” is a western gateway city and seat of Allegany County, Maryland, and the primary city of the Cumberland, MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical Area. At the 2010 census, the city had a population of 20,859 and the metropolitan area had a population of 103,299. Cumberland is a regional business and commercial center for Western Maryland and the Potomac Highlands of West Virginia. It is equidistant from Baltimore, Washington D.C. and Pittsburg, approximately 130 miles from each city. ______________ *The majority of the material, charts, and tables contained in this section was supplied by the Cities of Frostburg and Cumberland, Maryland, or was supplied by numerous pertinent websites and interviews with key government and industry leaders. Hampton Inn & Suites • Cumberland, Maryland • Feasibility Study Page C-1 History Cumberland is named after the son of King George II, Prince William, the Duke of Cumberland. It is built on the site of the old Fort Cumberland, the starting point for British General Edward Braddock's ill-fated attack on the French stronghold of Fort Duquesne (located on the site of present-day Pittsburgh) during the French and Indian War. Cumberland was also an outpost of Colonel George Washington during the French and Indian War and his first military headquarters was built here. Washington later returned to Cumberland as President in 1794 to review troops that had been assembled to thwart the Whiskey Rebellion. Cumberland was a key road, railroad and canal junction during the 19th century and at one time the second largest city in Maryland (second to the port city of Baltimore — hence its nickname "The Queen City").
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I-68/I-70: a WINDOW to the APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J
    I-68/I-70: A WINDOW TO THE APPALACHIANS by Dr. John J. Renton Dept. of Geology & Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Introduction The Appalachian Mountains are probably the most studied mountains on Earth. Many of our modern ideas as to the origin of major mountain systems evolved from early investigations of the Appalachian region. The Appalachians offer a unique opportunity to experience the various components of an entire mountain system within a relatively short distance and period of time. Compared to the extensive areas occupied by other mountain systems such as the Rockies and the Alps, the Appalachians are relatively narrow and can be easily crossed within a few hours driving time. Following I-68 and I-70 between Morgantown, WV, and Frederick, Maryland, for example, one can visit all of the major structural components within the Appalachians within a distance of about 160 miles. Before I continue, I would like to clarify references to the Allegheny and Appalachian mountains. The Allegheny Mountains were created about 250 million years ago when continents collided during the Alleghenian Orogeny to form the super-continent of Pangea (Figure 1). As the continents collided, a range of mountains were created in much the same fashion that the Himalaya Mountains are now being formed by the collision of India and Asia. About 50 million years after its Figure 1 1 creation, Pangea began to break up with the break occurring parallel to the axis of the original mountains. As the pieces that were to become our present continents moved away from each other, the Indian, Atlantic, and Arctic oceans were created (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]