Ecology, Biodiversity, Management, and Restoration of Aspen in the Sierra Nevada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecology, Biodiversity, Management, and Restoration of Aspen in the Sierra Nevada Ecology, Biodiversity, Management, and Restoration United States Department of Agriculture of Aspen in the Sierra Nevada Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Wayne D. Shepperd Report RMRS-GTR-178 Paul C. Rogers September 2006 David Burton Dale L. Bartos Shepperd, Wayne D.; Rogers, Paul C.; Burton, David; Bartos, Dale L. 2006. Ecology, biodiversity, management, and restoration of aspen in the Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-178. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station 122 p. Abstract—This report was commissioned by the USDA Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Manage- ment Unit to synthesize existing information on the ecology and management of aspen (Populus tremuloides) in the Sierra Nevada of California and surrounding environs. It summarizes available information on aspen throughout North America from published literature, internal government agency reports, and experienced scientists and managers. The historic distribution, abundance, and ecologic role of aspen in the Sierra Nevada are discussed, along with the reproductive physi- ology of aspen. Issues that affect aspen health and vigor in the Sierra Nevada and elsewhere are covered, along with methodology for assessing the condition of aspen and monitoring the ef- fects of management activities to restore and maintain aspen. Descriptions of the types of aspen that occur in the Sierra Nevada are presented along with alternative techniques to manage and restore aspen that are applicable wherever aspen is found. Key words: aspen, Populus tremuloides, ecology, management, disturbance, Sierra Nevada, Lake Tahoe basin, monitoring, and assessment The Authors Wayne D. Shepperd is a Research Silviculturist at the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station in Ft. Collins, CO. He holds a B.S. in Outdoor Recreation and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Silviculture from Colorado State University. He is a recognized authority on aspen and has published numerous scientific papers on aspen ecology and management during his 37 year career with the U.S. Forest Service. Paul C. Rogers is a Forest Ecology doctoral candidate at Utah State University in Logan, Utah. He previously worked as an analyst for the Forest Health Monitoring and Forest Inventory and Analysis programs in the Rocky Mountain Research Station. Paul holds a B.S. in Geography from Utah State University and an M.S. in Geography from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research interests include biogeography, aspen, lichenology, forest monitoring, and disturbance ecology. David Burton, a full time Bureau of Land Management and United States Forest Service volunteer and recipient of the Chief’s Forest Service Individual Volunteer Award for 2002, is principal co- ordinator of the Aspen Delineation Project, a collaborative effort of the Pacific Southwest Region (R5), California State Office-BLM, and California Department of Fish and Game. The project fo- cuses on how agencies have identified, mapped, treated, monitored, and studied aspen habitats. It also explores challenges, issues, and roadblocks surrounding aspen management. Dale L. Bartos is a Research Ecologist and Project Leader with the Rocky Mountain Research Station, and an Adjunct Assistant Professor at the Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Rocky Mountain Research Station Natural Resources Research Center 2150 Centre Avenue, Building A Fort Collins, CO 80526 Ecology, Biodiversity, Management, and Restoration of Aspen in the Sierra Nevada Wayne D. Shepperd Paul C. Rogers David Burton Dale L. Bartos United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Preface This publication was undertaken through a cooperative work agreement between the USDA Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit. Printing costs were covered by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region. We thank them for their generous support. Much of the information contained in this publication appeared in an internal report submitted to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit in January, 2006. It has since been subjected to additional peer and policy review and has been revised to include additional sources of information and clarify statements made in the earlier report. The purpose of this effort is to assemble the best information available about the ecology, bio- diversity, and management of aspen (Populus tremuloides) within the Sierra Nevada ecosystem and nearby environs. However, we feel that much of the information contained in this docu- ment is applicable outside the Sierra Nevada proper and will be useful to managers elsewhere. To meet our goal, we scoured published literature, internal agency reports, and captured local expertise through personal contacts with the intent of finding the best and most pertinent infor- mation available about aspen. Because aspen is a minor component of landscapes in the Sierra Nevada, the body of published literature is somewhat limited. Therefore, we have interpreted results of research published elsewhere in North America and extrapolated that knowledge to the biophysical setting of the Sierra Nevada within the limits of our accumulated experience and knowledge of aspen ecology. In all instances, we have endeavored to separate fact from opinion, and knowledge from assumption. We feel that what we have presented here is the state of the art of what is currently known about aspen, but remind readers that local knowledge and experience gained from trial and observation through an adaptive approach to management is as valuable as anything we have included in this document. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the many people who contributed their expertise to this General Tech- nical Report. Particular thanks are due to Bobette Jones, Ecologist, Eagle Lake RD, Lassen NF; Coye Robbins, Wildlife Biologist, Almanor RD, Lassen NF; Paul Schmidt, Wildlife Biologist, Alturas Field Of- fice, BLM; Victor Lyon, Wildlife Biologist, LTBMU; and Beth Brenneman, Ecologist, LTBMU who provided us with important aspen assessment data. We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of George Gruell, Carson City, Nevada; David Goin, Reno, Nevada; and Tom Rickman, Wildlife Biologist, Eagle Lake RD, Lassen NF for their repeat photography sets that helped capture some extensive changes that have occurred to aspen habitats in California. We are very grateful for the work of Bruce Davidson, GIS Specialist, LTBMU, Jessica Iles, Wild- life Biologist, Pacific RD, Eldorado NF for their many hours in designing and revising the maps that are found in this General Technical Report, and Kay Glowes, Penryn CA, for her countless hours of editing early drafts of this document. Finally, we would like to thank Ken Tate, Rangeland Watershed Specialist, UC Davis; Walt Mueg- gler, Rocky Mountain Research Station (retired); Hugh Safford, Regional Ecologist, USFS, Pacific Southwest Region; Shane Romsos, Wildlife Biologist, LTBMU; Mollie Hurt, Wildlife Biologist, LTBMU; David Fournier, Vegetation Management Planer, LTBMU; and Linda Joyce, Project Leader, RMRS for their diligent review of this synthesis. iii Contents Preface ..........................................................................................................iii Acknowledgments .........................................................................................iii Chapter 1. Introduction ...............................................................................1 Chapter 2. Natural and Historical Setting ...................................................7 Physical Environment ........................................................................................7 Defining the Area of Concern ....................................................................7 Ecoregion Sections .....................................................................................7 Aspen Distribution .....................................................................................9 Geology and Glaciation ...........................................................................10 Water and Hydrology ..............................................................................12 Climate Effects on Vegetation..........................................................................14 Long-Term Climate Variability ..................................................................14 A 1000-Year Record .................................................................................14 Recent Climates and Future Directions ....................................................15 Historical Disturbance Ecology .......................................................................16 Pre-Settlement .........................................................................................17 Euro-American Settlement .......................................................................18 Modern Era ..............................................................................................20 Chapter 3. Aspen Ecology ..........................................................................23 Physiology of Aspen ........................................................................................23 Aspen’s Ecological Amplitude and Habitat ...............................................23 Clonal Habit and Root Systems ................................................................24 Damaging Agents Affecting Aspen ..................................................................26
Recommended publications
  • Page 5 of the 2020 Antelope, Deer and Elk Regulations
    WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Antelope, 2020 Deer and Elk Hunting Regulations Don't forget your conservation stamp Hunters and anglers must purchase a conservation stamp to hunt and fish in Wyoming. (See page 6) See page 18 for more information. wgfd.wyo.gov Wyoming Hunting Regulations | 1 CONTENTS Access on Lands Enrolled in the Department’s Walk-in Areas Elk or Hunter Management Areas .................................................... 4 Hunt area map ............................................................................. 46 Access Yes Program .......................................................................... 4 Hunting seasons .......................................................................... 47 Age Restrictions ................................................................................. 4 Characteristics ............................................................................. 47 Antelope Special archery seasons.............................................................. 57 Hunt area map ..............................................................................12 Disabled hunter season extension.............................................. 57 Hunting seasons ...........................................................................13 Elk Special Management Permit ................................................. 57 Characteristics ..............................................................................13 Youth elk hunters........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C E N Oz Oi C C Oll a Ps E of T H E E Ast Er N Ui Nt a M O U Nt Ai Ns a N D Dr Ai
    Research Paper T H E M E D I S S U E: C Revolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River Syste m II GEOSPHERE Cenozoic collapse of the eastern Uinta Mountains and drainage evolution of the Uinta Mountains region G E O S P H E R E; v. 1 4, n o. 1 Andres Aslan 1 , Marisa Boraas-Connors 2 , D o u gl a s A. S pri n k el 3 , Tho mas P. Becker 4 , Ranie Lynds 5 , K arl E. K arl str o m 6 , a n d M att H eizl er 7 1 Depart ment of Physical and Environ mental Sciences, Colorado Mesa University, 1100 North Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, U S A doi:10.1130/ G E S01523.1 2 Depart ment of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Natural Resources Building, Roo m 322, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U S A 3 Utah Geological Survey, 1594 W North Te mple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-6100, U S A 1 5 fi g ur e s; 1 t a bl e; 4 s u p pl e m e nt al fil e s 4 Exxon Mobil Exploration Co mpany, 22777 Spring woods Village Park way, Spring, Texas 77389, U S A 5 Wyo ming State Geological Survey, P. O. Box 1347, Lara mie, Wyo ming 82073, U S A 6 Depart ment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Ne w Mexico, Redondo Drive NE, Albuquerque, Ne w Mexico 87131, U S A C O R RESP O N DE N CE: aaslan @colorado mesa .edu 7 Ne w Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Ne w Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, Ne w Mexico 87801, U S A CI T A TI O N: Aslan, A., Boraas- Connors, M., Sprinkel, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains
    United States Department of Agriculture Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-335 November 2016 Bergdahl, Aaron D.; Hill, Alison, tech. coords. 2016. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 229 p. Abstract Hosts, distribution, symptoms and signs, disease cycle, and management strategies are described for 84 hardwood and 32 conifer diseases in 56 chapters. Color illustrations are provided to aid in accurate diagnosis. A glossary of technical terms and indexes to hosts and pathogens also are included. Keywords: Tree diseases, forest pathology, Great Plains, forest and tree health, windbreaks. Cover photos by: James A. Walla (top left), Laurie J. Stepanek (top right), David Leatherman (middle left), Aaron D. Bergdahl (middle right), James T. Blodgett (bottom left) and Laurie J. Stepanek (bottom right). To learn more about RMRS publications or search our online titles: www.fs.fed.us/rm/publications www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/ Background This technical report provides a guide to assist arborists, landowners, woody plant pest management specialists, foresters, and plant pathologists in the diagnosis and control of tree diseases encountered in the Great Plains. It contains 56 chapters on tree diseases prepared by 27 authors, and emphasizes disease situations as observed in the 10 states of the Great Plains: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The need for an updated tree disease guide for the Great Plains has been recog- nized for some time and an account of the history of this publication is provided here.
    [Show full text]
  • Deer Season Subject to the Species Limitation of Their License in the Hunt Area(S) Where Their License Is Valid As Specified in Section 2 of This Chapter
    CHAPTER 6 DEER HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302, § 23-1-703 and § 23-2-104. Section 2. Regular Hunting Seasons. Hunt areas, season dates and limitations. Special Regular Season Hunt License Archery Dates Dates Area Type Opens Closes Opens Closes Quota Limitations 1 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 1 Gen Nov. 21 Nov. 30 Antlered white-tailed deer off private land; any white-tailed deer on private land 1, 2, 7 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 3500 Doe or fawn valid on 3 private land 2 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 3 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 4 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land except the lands of the State of Wyoming's Ranch A property shall be closed 4 7 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 300 Doe or fawn valid on private land 5 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 5 6 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 200 Doe or fawn 6-1 6 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 7 Gen Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts, Posters and Program
    Gold and Silver Deposits in Colorado Symposium Abstracts, posters And program Berthoud Hall, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado July 20-24, 2017 GOLD AND SILVER DEPOSITS IN COLORADO SYMPOSIUM July 20-24, 2017 ABSTRACTS, POSTERS AND PROGRAM Principle Editors: Lewis C. Kleinhans Mary L. Little Peter J. Modreski Sponsors: Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum Denver Regional Geologists’ Society Friends of the Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum Friends of Mineralogy – Colorado Chapter Front Cover: Breckenridge wire gold specimen (photo credit Jeff Scovil). Cripple Creek Open Pit Mine panorama, March 10, 2017 (photo credit Mary Little). Design by Lew Kleinhans. Back Cover: The Mineral Industry Timeline – Exploration (old gold panner); Discovery (Cresson "Vug" from Cresson Mine, Cripple Creek); Development (Cripple Creek Open Pit Mine); Production (gold bullion refined from AngloGold Ashanti Cripple Creek dore and used to produce the gold leaf that was applied to the top of the Colorado Capital Building. Design by Lew Kleinhans and Jim Paschis. Berthoud Hall, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado July 20-24, 2017 Symposium Planning Committee Members: Peter J. Modreski Michael L. Smith Steve Zahony Lewis C. Kleinhans Mary L. Little Bruce Geller Jim Paschis Amber Brenzikofer Ken Kucera L.J.Karr Additional thanks to: Bill Rehrig and Jim Piper. Acknowledgements: Far too many contributors participated in the making of this symposium than can be mentioned here. Notwithstanding, the Planning Committee would like to acknowledge and express appreciation for endorsements from the Colorado Geological Survey, the Colorado Mining Association, the Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Colorado Division of Mine Safety and Reclamation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Winter/Spring 3
    GLENBROOKLIFE Nature’s paradise on your doorstep. WINTER/SPRING 2019 NEWSLETTER in this issue Letters to the Members .............1-4 LETTER TO THE MEMBERS FROM THE Ascent to Capt. Pomin Rock .....4-5 GHOA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meadows/Forest Health ............6-7 & Fire Safety Update The following is a summary of our 2018 accomplishments and the major GHOA activities which are currently underway at Glenbrook. Slaughterhouse Meadow .......... 8-9 Restoration Project 4FISCAL YEAR 2018 GHOA completed Fiscal Year 2018 with a cash Sierra Storm King Returns .....10-11 surplus of $32,910 which continues GHOA’s excellent financial health. At the start of Fiscal Year 2019, the Association had $2,177,887 in its Reserve NASA Sierra Nevada Snowpack ..11 Fund for use on future capital assets’ upgrades and maintenance. Glenbrook’s Big Snow..................12 Birth & Fate of Natl Treasure ........13 4WINTER/SNOW REMOVAL The GHOA Board awarded the 2018-2019 snow removal contract to Nevada Environmental Consulting NV Boater Req’d Equipment .......14 (NVENV). The objective of the snow removal program is to have GHOA Near Shore Monitoring Update ....15 owned roads open and passable at all times during winter. Residents know only too well how the snow stacked up in February with back to Lake Tahoe Interesting Facts .......16 back to back storms that really put the snow removal crews to the test. Activities Around Lake Tahoe ......17 After the first multi-day storm NVENV evaluated their shortfalls, added equipment, and revised plowing schedules to ensure that the GHOA Glenbrook Historical ....................17 roads remained clear at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • SWEETWATER COUNTY WYOMING Rock Springs & Green River
    SWEETWATER COUNTY WYOMING Rock Springs & Green River Explore 100s of miles The of trails and shoreline. Flaming Soak up the sunshine Gorge and catch the “Big One.” tourwyoming.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 2-3 SWEETWATER COUNTY MAP 23-24 EVENTS CALENDAR 25-27 FLAMING GORGE COUNTRY 4-9 TOWNS 28 SEEDSKADEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 5 ROCK SPRINGS 29 PILOT BUTTE WILD HORSES 6 GREEN RIVER 7 SUPERIOR 30-37 INDOOR/OUTDOOR RECREATION & PARKS 7 WAMSUTTER 31 KILLPECKER SAND DUNES 8 HISTORIC SOUTH PASS 32 ATV/OHV 9 EDEN VALLEY 33 MOUNTAIN BIKING 9 INDUSTRY IN SWEETWATER COUNTY 34-35 ADVENTURES ON THE GREEN RIVER 35 GREEN RIVER RECREATION CENTER 10-16 HISTORY, MUSEUMS & TRAILS 36 ROLLING GREEN RIVER COUNTRY CLUB 11 ROCK SPRINGS HISTORICAL MUSEUM 36 WHITE MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE 12 WWCC NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM 37 ROCK SPRINGS FAMILY RECREATION CENTER 13 SWEETWATER COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM 37 ROCK SPRINGS CIVIC CENTER 14-15 HISTORIC PIONEER TRAILS 38 SWEETWATER COUNTY PARKS 16 COMMUNITY FINE ARTS CENTER 39 SCENIC DRIVES 17-29 SIGHTSEEING 40-42 ITINERARIES 18 ROCK FORMATIONS 43 GUIDED TOURS 19 WHITE MOUNTAIN PETROGLYPHS 44-45 NATIONAL PARKS 20 FOSSILS OF LAKE GOSIUTE 46-47 ACCOMMODATIONS 20 THE RELIANCE TIPPLE 48-52 DINING & NIGHTLIFE 21-22 SWEETWATER EVENTS COMPLEX ACTIVITY ICONS KEY SIGHTSEEING CAMPING FISHING HIKING BIKING GOLF WATER SPORTS TourWyoming.com create adventure The Best Vacations Don’t Just Happen When You Get There. They Happen Along the Way. Whether Sweetwater County is your final Wyoming destination or you’re visiting on the way to the National Parks, there are countless ways to create an adventure of your own.
    [Show full text]
  • Polypore Fungi As a Flagship Group to Indicate Changes in Biodiversity – a Test Case from Estonia Kadri Runnel1* , Otto Miettinen2 and Asko Lõhmus1
    Runnel et al. IMA Fungus (2021) 12:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-00050-y IMA Fungus RESEARCH Open Access Polypore fungi as a flagship group to indicate changes in biodiversity – a test case from Estonia Kadri Runnel1* , Otto Miettinen2 and Asko Lõhmus1 Abstract Polyporous fungi, a morphologically delineated group of Agaricomycetes (Basidiomycota), are considered well studied in Europe and used as model group in ecological studies and for conservation. Such broad interest, including widespread sampling and DNA based taxonomic revisions, is rapidly transforming our basic understanding of polypore diversity and natural history. We integrated over 40,000 historical and modern records of polypores in Estonia (hemiboreal Europe), revealing 227 species, and including Polyporus submelanopus and P. ulleungus as novelties for Europe. Taxonomic and conservation problems were distinguished for 13 unresolved subgroups. The estimated species pool exceeds 260 species in Estonia, including at least 20 likely undescribed species (here documented as distinct DNA lineages related to accepted species in, e.g., Ceriporia, Coltricia, Physisporinus, Sidera and Sistotrema). Four broad ecological patterns are described: (1) polypore assemblage organization in natural forests follows major soil and tree-composition gradients; (2) landscape-scale polypore diversity homogenizes due to draining of peatland forests and reduction of nemoral broad-leaved trees (wooded meadows and parks buffer the latter); (3) species having parasitic or brown-rot life-strategies are more substrate- specific; and (4) assemblage differences among woody substrates reveal habitat management priorities. Our update reveals extensive overlap of polypore biota throughout North Europe. We estimate that in Estonia, the biota experienced ca. 3–5% species turnover during the twentieth century, but exotic species remain rare and have not attained key functions in natural ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • MUSHROOMS of the OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST Compiled By
    MUSHROOMS OF THE OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST Compiled by Dana L. Richter, School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI for Ottawa National Forest, Ironwood, MI March, 2011 Introduction There are many thousands of fungi in the Ottawa National Forest filling every possible niche imaginable. A remarkable feature of the fungi is that they are ubiquitous! The mushroom is the large spore-producing structure made by certain fungi. Only a relatively small number of all the fungi in the Ottawa forest ecosystem make mushrooms. Some are distinctive and easily identifiable, while others are cryptic and require microscopic and chemical analyses to accurately name. This is a list of some of the most common and obvious mushrooms that can be found in the Ottawa National Forest, including a few that are uncommon or relatively rare. The mushrooms considered here are within the phyla Ascomycetes – the morel and cup fungi, and Basidiomycetes – the toadstool and shelf-like fungi. There are perhaps 2000 to 3000 mushrooms in the Ottawa, and this is simply a guess, since many species have yet to be discovered or named. This number is based on lists of fungi compiled in areas such as the Huron Mountains of northern Michigan (Richter 2008) and in the state of Wisconsin (Parker 2006). The list contains 227 species from several authoritative sources and from the author’s experience teaching, studying and collecting mushrooms in the northern Great Lakes States for the past thirty years. Although comments on edibility of certain species are given, the author neither endorses nor encourages the eating of wild mushrooms except with extreme caution and with the awareness that some mushrooms may cause life-threatening illness or even death.
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Roadless Name GIS Acres 1 Beaverhead-Deerlodge
    These acres were calculated from GIS data Available on the Forest Service Roadless website for the 2001 Roadless EIS. The data was downloaded on 8/24/2011 by Suzanne Johnson WO Minerals & Geology‐ GIS/Database Specialist. It was discovered that the Santa Fe NF in NM has errors. This spreadsheet holds the corrected data from the Santa Fe NF. The GIS data was downloaded from the eGIS data center SDE instance on 8/25/2011 Region Forest Roadless Name GIS Acres 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Anderson Mountain 31,500.98 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Basin Creek 9,499.51 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Bear Creek 8,122.88 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Beaver Lake 11,862.81 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Big Horn Mountain 50,845.85 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Black Butte 39,160.06 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Call Mountain 8,795.54 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Cattle Gulch 19,390.45 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Cherry Lakes 19,945.49 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Dixon Mountain 3,674.46 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge East Pioneer 145,082.05 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Electric Peak 17,997.26 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Emerine 14,282.26 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Fleecer 31,585.50 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Flint Range / Dolus Lakes 59,213.30 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Four Eyes Canyon 7,029.38 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Fred Burr 5,814.01 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Freezeout Mountain 97,304.68 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Garfield Mountain 41,891.22 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Goat Mountain 9,347.87 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Granulated Mountain 14,950.11 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Highlands 20,043.87 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Italian Peak 90,401.31 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Lone Butte 13,725.16 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Mckenzie Canyon 33,350.48 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Middle Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Polypores from Northern and Central Yunnan Province, Southwestern China
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sydowia Jahr/Year: 2008 Band/Volume: 60 Autor(en)/Author(s): Yuan Hai-Sheng, Dai Yu-Cheng Artikel/Article: Polypores from northern and central Yunnun Province, Southwestern China. 147-159 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., Horn, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Polypores from northern and central Yunnan Province, Southwestern China H.S Yuan & Y.C. Dai* Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China Yuan H.S. & Dai Y.C. (2008) Polypores from northern and central Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. ± Sydowia 60(1): pp±pp. 126 species of polypore were identified based on approximately 350collec- tions from four forest parks or nature reserves in northern and central Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Most species are new to this area. A checklist of these polypores with substrate and collecting data is supplied. Junghuhnia sub- nitida H.S. Yuan & Y.C. Dai is described and illustrated as new to science. Keywords: Basidiomycota, checklist, Junghuhnia, taxonomy, wood-rotting fungi Intensive studies on the wood-rotting fungi in China were car- ried out in recent years, especially on polypore diversity in the tem- perate and boreal forests in the country (Dai 2000, Dai et al. 2004b, Dai & PenttilaÈ 2006, Yuan et al. 2006, Li et al. 2007). Southwestern China, including Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan Provinces, is an area of high biodiversity. Some reports on wood-inhabiting fungi from the area were published (Ryvarden 1983, Maekawa & Zang 1995, Mae- kawa et al. 2002, Dai & Wu, 2003, Dai et al.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Rock Springs County of Sweetwater State of Wyoming City
    r­ '. -~~--'--~~~- ---- -.~---~ ,/----~---- .----.~- -_. ---­ I. 370 City of Rock Springs County of Sweetwater State of Wyoming City council met in regular session on July 6, 1999. Mayor Oblock called the meeting to order at 7: 00 p. m. Members present included Councilmen Horn, Gilbert, Thompson, Porenta, Vase, Cheese, Shea, Knight and Mayor Oblock. Department heads present included Neil' Kourbelas, Vince Crow, Mike Rickabaugh, Brad Sarff, George McJunkin, Dave Silovich, and Colleen Peterson. Councilman Vase moved to approve the June 15 minutes and the June 29 special council minutes. Seconded by Councilman Knight. Motion carried. PRESENTATIOH The local and state chapters of the American Red Cross recognized firefighters George Pryich, Ross Condie and Shawn Wells for their actions in saving the life of Dan Putnam after he was struck by lightning at the municipal golf course. The commendation noted that in the local chapter's 82-year history this is the first life-saving award ever granted. During the presentation, the Red Cross urged every citizen to take a life saving course. Mayor Oblock noted that automatic defibrillators recently bought by the Fire Department have already proven to be a worthwhile purchase. APPOINTMENTS President Horn presented mayoral appointments of Cheryl Confer to the Planning & Zoning Commission, Todd Fales to the Board of Adjustment and council member Gilbert to replace councilman Martin on all standing council committees previously held by him; namely, Parks & Recreation, Water/Sewer, Ad Hoc Dispatch Committee, Garbage Committee, and Ward III Streets & Alleys. Councilman Thompson moved to approve the appointment of Cheryl Confer to Planning & Zoning. Seconded by Councilman Shea.
    [Show full text]