DOCSLIB.ORG

ARMOR, November-December 1988 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARMOR, November-December 1988 Edition In 1944, B.H. Liddell Hart wrote in Thouahts on (Avenue of Heroes) near the entrance to Ar- War, "The spirit of discipline, as distinct from its lington Cemetery. Section 2 of Public Law 99- outward and visible guises, is the result of as- 620 states, "The United States shall not pay sociation with martial traditions and their living any expense of establishment of the memorial." embodiment." Sponsoring organizations include the US. Our Armored Force's body of martial tradition Armor and Artillery Associations; World Wars began to take shape 70 years ago in the St. Tank Corps Association: Veterans of the Battle Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne campaigns, when the of the Bulge: 1lth ACR Association; Tank first American tankers traded their horses for Destroyer Association: 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, primitive mechanical mounts on which they 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, loth, llth, 12th, 13th, 14th, would spearhead a new development in ground 16th Armored Division Associations: Council warfare, leading inevitably to the creation of a of Armored Divisions Association; and the Na- new combat arm. tional Association of Uniformed Services. Subsequent generations took that budding The memorial will feature a panoramic evolu- legacy and built on it in Tunisia, Sicily, Bas- tion of Armor and will honor all those "men of togne. Pusan, Inchon, Operations Cedar Falls steel" who served in WWI, WWII, Korea and and Junction City, and at Ben Het. The heritage Vietnam in armored divisions or separate ar- we have received is rich in stories of courage mored battalions; tank destroyer battalions; ar- under fire, comradeship, and audacity. mored mechanized infantry, artillery, engineer Today, our regimental system, with its battalions; cavalry regiments and squadrons: honorary colonels and sergeants major, retells and Marine Corps armored units. those stories to yet another generation of The cost of this memorial is relatively inex- tankers and cavalrymen who aspire to move pensive - $400,000. But time is running out. down the same proud road. This is the associa- Funding must be completed by November tion with martial traditions and their living em- 1989 if the monument is to be completed in bodiment of which Liddell Hart wrote. time for the 50th anniversary of the Armored While we work to see that these martial tradi- Force in 1990. The sponsoring organizations tions and accounts of Americans in battle are have done their part, but appeals to industries handed down to following generations and are that built our tanks and APCs over the years thus not forgotten, perhaps it is appropriate that have netted next to nothing. The Armored For- the American people have a visual reminder of ces Monument Committee needs help to avert the accomplishments of our Armored Forces. falling short on this project. If you are inter- Toward this purpose, the Armored Forces ested in seeing a monument to our Armored Monument Committee formed in 1986 to erect a Forces of the past, which would serve as an in- monument in our nation's capital. Its congres- spiration to armored soldiers of the present sional liaison team successfully met its chal- and future, perhaps you can help. Please con- lenge of securing Congressional approval, and tact on 6 November 1986, the president signed Armored Forces Monument Fund Public Law 99-620 authorizing the monument, P.O. Box 1146 which will be constructed on Memorial Drive Fort Myer, Virginia 2221 1 - PJC By Order of the Secretary of the Army: Official: CARL E. VUONO R. L. DILWORTH General, United States Army Brigadier General, United States Army Chief of Staff The Adjutant General ARMOR I The Professional Development Bulletin of the Armor Branch PB- 17-88-6 (Test) Editor-in-Chief Features MAJOR PATRICK J. COONEY 8 Assault and Tactical Bridging for Armor Units Managing Editor by Brigadier General Philip L. Bolt6 (Ret.) JON T. CLEMENS 13 Red Army Tank Commander Commandant by Lieutenant Colonel Richard Armstrong MG THOMAS H. TAlT 20 Cavalry Scouts at the Joint Readiness Training Center by Captain Alan R. Horn ARMOR (ISSN 0004-2420) is published bimonthly by the U.S. Army Armor Center, 4401 Vine Grove Road, Fort Knox. KY 40121. 22 The Royal Armoured Corps Tank Museum Disclaimer: The information contained in Has Expanded and Improved ARMOR represents the professional opinions of by Richard M. Ogorkiewicz the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official Army or TRADOC position, nor does it 25 The Desert Training Center: Yesterday and Today change or supersede any information presented in other official Army publications. by Francis G. Blake Official distribution is limited to one copy for each heavy brigade headquarters, armored 30 Cavalry Missions and Structure cavalry regiment headquarters. armor battalion by Colonel (P) Jarrett J. Robertson headquarters, armored cavalry squadron head- quarters, reconnaissance squadron head- quarters, armored cavalry troop, armor com- 34 Armor Training 1997 pany, and motorized brigade headquarters of by Major H. Critz Hardy the United States Army. In addition, Army libraries, Army and DOD schools, HQ DA and 37 Soldier Training Publications: MACOM staff agencies with responsibility for ar- Supporting Training in the 1990s mored, direct fire, ground combat systems, or- ganizations. and the training of personnel for by Major Albert E. Bailey such organizations may request two copies by sending a military letter to the editor-in-chief. Departments Authorized Content: ARMOR will print only those materials for which the US. Army Armor 2 Letters Center has proponency. That proponency in- cludes: all armored, direct-fire ground combat 2 Contacts systems that do not serve primarily as infantry 6 Commander’s Hatch carriers; all weapons used exclusively in these 7 Recognition Quiz systems or by CMF 19-series enlisted soldiers; 40 Professional Thoughts any miscellaneous items of equipment which 49 armor and armored cavalry organizations use Recognition Quiz Answers exclusively; training for all SC 12A, 128, and 50 Bustle Rack 12C officers and for all CMF-1Pseries enlisted 51 Armor Branch Notes soldiers: and information concerning the train- 52 Books ing, logistics, history, and leadership of armor and armored cavalry units at the brigadelregi- ment level and below, to include Threat units at those levels. Secondclass official mail postage paid al Fort Knox. KY. and additional mailing offices. Material may be reprinted, provided credit is Postmaster: Send address changes to Editor. ARMOR, AlTN ATSB-MAG. Fott Knox. KY given to ARMOR and to the author, except 40121. where copyright is indicated. Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release: distribution is unlimited USPS 467-970 November-December 1988, Vol XCVlI No. 6 The Lessons of Vietnam ly, ignoring of history and hard lessons Tung. It was clear at that time (1964), that learned, have gotten our military estab- LIC demands thorough analysis and Dear Sir, lishment into situations for which they doctrinal study on the part of every were not prepared. More important, these branch and element involved. This is par- Major Michael R. Matheny ("Armor in were situations for which the troops in the ticularly applicable to those arms in Low Intensity Conflict," July-August 1988 tanks were not prepared. mutually supporting roles. ARMOR) is to be commended for address- This is a fact, despite the vast resources ing this sticky topic of Armor doctrine. His and documentation of LIC around the Vivid lessons in the application of statement, "There is still little written world available for command and staff Armor/lnfantry teams to LlCs were avail- doctrine on armor operations in Low Inten- utilization at the time of troop commit- able to us prior to our commitment of sity Conflict," is not profound, but all too ment. And today, stacks of staff studies, armor and armored cavalry to the Viet- factual, and references the post-WW11 fixa- combat journals and official lessons nam conflict. French use of limited armor tion of our strategic and tactical planners learned appear to be gathering dust. resources in Indochina should have with the great European land battle. provided glaring examples of how NOT to Two deadly "non-wars" since the 1 spent nearly two years researching commit tankfinfantry elements. Bernard B. Japanese surrender in Tokyo Bay clearly il- Low Intensity Conflict in its 1960s guise - Fall in his masterful work, Street Without lustrate that ignorance, or more realistical- revolutionary war as defined by Mao Tse &, described the destruction in detail of (Note: Fort Knox AUTOVON prefix is 464. DIRECTORY - Points of Contact Commercial prefix is Area Code 5o2-624-x~~~). ARMOR Editorial Offices U.S. ARMY ARMOR SCHOOL Editor-in-Chief Commandant (ATZK-CG) Major Patrick J. Cooney 2249 MG Thomas H. Tait 2121 Managing Editor Assistant Commandant (ATSB-AC) Jon T. Clemens 2249 BG Dennis V. Crumley 7555 Assistant Editor Deputy Assistant Commandant (ATSB-DAC) Robert E. Rome 2610 COL Claude L. Clark 1050 Production Assistant Command Sergeant Major Vivian Thompson 2610 CSM John M. Stcphens 4952 Contributing Artist Maintenance Dept. (ATSB-MA) SFC Robert Torsrud 2610 COL Garry P. Hixson 8346 Command and Staff Dept. (ATSB-CS) MAILING ADDRESS: ARMOR, ATTN ATSB- COL A. W. Kremer 5855 MAG, Fort box, KY 40121-5210. Weapons Dept. (ATSB-WP) LTC(P) George R. Wallace 111 1055 ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS: To improve speed and Directorate of Training & Doctrine (ATSB-DOTD) accuracy in editing. manuscripts should be originals or COL Donald E. Appler 7250 clear copies, either typed or printed out in near-lettcr- Directorate of Combat Developments (ATSB-CD) quality printer mode. Stories can also be accepted on COL Donald L. Smart 5050 5-1/4" floppy disks in Microsoft WORD, MuhiMate, Dir. of Eval. & Standardization (ATSB-DOES) Wordperfect, Wordstar, or Xerox Writer (please in- Mr. Clayton E. Shannon 3440 clude a printout). Please tape captions to any illustra- Training Group (ATZK-TC-TBF) tions submitted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Evolution of British Tactical and Operational Tank Doctrine and Training in the First World War
    The evolution of British tactical and operational tank doctrine and training in the First World War PHILIP RICHARD VENTHAM TD BA (Hons.) MA. Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy by the University of Wolverhampton October 2016 ©Copyright P R Ventham 1 ABSTRACT Tanks were first used in action in September 1916. There had been no previous combat experience on which to base tactical and operational doctrine for the employment of this novel weapon of war. Training of crews and commanders was hampered by lack of vehicles and weapons. Time was short in which to train novice crews. Training facilities were limited. Despite mechanical limitations of the early machines and their vulnerability to adverse ground conditions, the tanks achieved moderate success in their initial actions. Advocates of the tanks, such as Fuller and Elles, worked hard to convince the sceptical of the value of the tank. Two years later, tanks had gained the support of most senior commanders. Doctrine, based on practical combat experience, had evolved both within the Tank Corps and at GHQ and higher command. Despite dramatic improvements in the design, functionality and reliability of the later marks of heavy and medium tanks, they still remained slow and vulnerable to ground conditions and enemy counter-measures. Competing demands for materiel meant there were never enough tanks to replace casualties and meet the demands of formation commanders. This thesis will argue that the somewhat patchy performance of the armoured vehicles in the final months of the war was less a product of poor doctrinal guidance and inadequate training than of an insufficiency of tanks and the difficulties of providing enough tanks in the right locations at the right time to meet the requirements of the manoeuvre battles of the ‘Hundred Days’.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Procurement Politics, Technology Transfer and the Challenges of Collaborative MBT Projects in the NATO Alliance Since 1945
    A Standard European Tank? Procurement Politics, Technology Transfer and the Challenges of Collaborative MBT Projects in the NATO Alliance since 1945 Mike Cubbin School of Arts and Media Salford University Submitted to the University of Salford in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 Abstract International cooperation in weapons technology projects has long been a feature of alliance politics; and, there are many advantages to both international technology transfer and standardisation within military alliances. International collaboration between national defence industries has produced successful weapon systems from technologically advanced fighter aircraft to anti-tank missiles. Given the success of many joint defence projects, one unresolved question is why there have been no successful collaborative international main battle tank (MBT) projects since 1945. This thesis seeks to answer this question by considering four case studies of failed attempts to produce an MBT through an international collaborative tank project: first and second, the Franco-German efforts to produce a standard European tank, or Euro-Panzer (represented by two separate projects in 1957-63 and 1977- 83); third, the US-German MBT-70 project (1963-70); and, fourth, the Anglo-German Future Main Battle Tank, or KPz3 (1971-77). In order to provide an explanation of the causes of failure on four separate occasions, the analysis includes reference to other high-technology civilian and military joint projects which either succeeded,
    [Show full text]
  • Armor Museum Trifecta
    Armor Museum Trifecta by Richard Nicoletti During 2010, I was lucky enough to be able to visit three world class armor museums. While on family vacation to England and France last June, I was able to visit The Tank Museum in Bovington, UK and the Musee des Blindes in Saumur, France. On an October business trip to the San Francisco Bay Area, I took some extra time to visit the Military Vehicle Technology Foundation (MVTF) (better known as the Jacques Littlefield collection) in Portola Valley, California. There are four things I hope to accomplish with this article. Share my experience visiting each of the three museums. Provide a representative sampling of photos from the three facilities. Supply information that may be helpful to others planning visits of their own. Inspire readers to take their own virtual tours using the URLs provided. The Tank Museum Web: http://www.tankmuseum.org The Tank Museum is the museum of the Royal Armored Corps. and Royal Tank Regiment. It is housed in a 50,000' sq. exhibit hall located in Bovington Camp in Dorset in South West England. In 1916, during the Great War, the camp was established by the British War Office as a training facility for tank crews. In 1919, a small number of the tanks returning from France were put aside so tank crews and designers could understand the tank's early heritage. When Rudyard Kipling visited the site in 1923, he recommended a museum be created. In 1947, the facility was opened to the general public. Since the camp is still an active training facility, you will most likely see modern British Army vehicles parked, traveling on its roads, or in its workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • Does War Belong in Museums?
    Wolfgang Muchitsch (ed.) Does War Belong in Museums? Volume 4 Editorial Das Museum, eine vor über zweihundert Jahren entstandene Institution, ist gegenwärtig ein weltweit expandierendes Erfolgsmodell. Gleichzeitig hat sich ein differenziertes Wissen vom Museum als Schlüsselphänomen der Moderne entwickelt, das sich aus unterschiedlichen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen und aus den Erfahrungen der Museumspraxis speist. Diesem Wissen ist die Edition gewidmet, die die Museumsakademie Joanneum – als Einrichtung eines der ältesten und größten Museen Europas, des Universalmuseum Joanneum in Graz – herausgibt. Die Reihe wird herausgegeben von Peter Pakesch, Wolfgang Muchitsch und Bettina Habsburg-Lothringen. Wolfgang Muchitsch (ed.) Does War Belong in Museums? The Representation of Violence in Exhibitions An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative ini- tiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 (BY-NC-ND). which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Natio- nalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or uti- lized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any infor- mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • CURSO DE CIÊNCIAS MILITARES Arthur Lazzari Royes a UTILIZAÇÃ
    ACADEMIA MILITAR DAS AGULHAS NEGRAS ACADEMIA REAL MILITAR (1811) CURSO DE CIÊNCIAS MILITARES Arthur Lazzari Royes A UTILIZAÇÃO E A EVOLUÇÃO DOS CARROS DE COMBATE DURANTE A SEGUNDA GUERRA MUNDIAL (1939-1945) Resende 2020 Arthur Lazzari Royes A UTILIZAÇÃO E A EVOLUÇÃO DOS CARROS DE COMBATE DURANTE A SEGUNDA GUERRA MUNDIAL (1939-1945) Monografia apresentada ao Curso de Graduação em Ciências Militares da Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras (AMAN), como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Bacharel em Ciências Militares. Orientador: Major Marcio Sousa Pinho Resende 2020 Arthur Lazzari Royes A UTILIZAÇÃO E A EVOLÇÃO DOS CARROS DE COMBATE DURANTE A SEGUNDA GUERRA MUNDIAL (1939-1945) Monografia apresentada ao Curso de Graduação em Ciências Militares da Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras (AMAN), como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Bacharel em Ciências Militares. Aprovado em _____ de ____________________ de 2020: Banca examinadora: Marcio Sousa Pinho, Major (Presidente/Orientador) Pablo Saidelles Machado, 1° Tenente - Avaliador Vinicius Venturini Silva, 1° Tenente - Avaliador Resende 2020 Arthur Lazzari Royes Dedico este trabalho principalmente à minha irmã Isabele, minha mãe Míriam e minha tia Mauren. Sem o apoio, incentivo, orações e dedicação de vocês não seria possível a conquista deste objetivo nem este caminho profissional escolhido. AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço primeiramente à Deus, pela força, paciência, persistência, sorte, sabedoria e a proteção necessárias ao longo desses anos possibilitando a conclusão deste trabalho e a formação neste instituição. Agradeço também a meus pais, família e amigos que apoiaram nos mais diversos momentos para que conseguisse alcançar o objetivo final de tornar-me oficial de cavalaria. Ao Capitão Médico César Augusto Bertini Torres pelo auxilio na confecção deste trabalho muito antes de seu início.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery
    THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery Robert S. Cameron, Ph.D. About the Cover The cover shows the special logo developed for the Canadian Army Trophy, indicating the com- petition range and year. The six national flags represent the participating nations. The inner circle includes the insignia for HQ AFCENT flanked by CENTAG on the left and NORTHAG on the right, all superimposed over a maple leaf symbolizing the competition’s Canadian origins. (Ron Mihalko) THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery Robert S. Cameron, Ph.D. U.S. Army Armor Branch Historian U.S. Army Armor School Fort Benning, Georgia 31905 iii iii iv iv Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward iii Introduction xi Chapter 1: The Early Years of the Canadian Army Trophy, 1963-1968 1 Evolving U.S. and NATO Policy 1 Competition Origins 3 CAT in the 1960s 5 Belgium’s American Cast-off 6 The German Armored Force Comes of Age 8 British Centurions 13 The Canadian Experience 15 The Netherlands 16 Whither the Americans? 17 Changing CAT 20 Chapter 2: Improving the Canadian Army Trophy, 1970-1979 25 NATO Developments 25 Updating CAT 28 Rule Britannia in 1970 29 The Doldrums of 1973 and 1975 33 Upping the Ante 37 O Canada in 1977 37 CAT 1979 44 The American Thunderbolt in Disarray 48 Reforging the Thunderbolt 53 Chapter 3: The Canadian Army Trophy in the Spotlight, 1981-1985 67 Cold War Background 67 Rules and Conditions 69 National Preparations 71 CAT 1981 75 Preparing for CAT 1983 79 CAT 1983 81 The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiger Tank, to Be Ready for Production in February 1943
    CONTENTS Introduction Chronology Design and Development Technical Specifications Crew Training and Organisation Tigers vs Allied Armour Conclusion Glossary and Abbreviations INTRODUCTION Tigers on the Eastern Front, between Bielgorod and Orel, July 1943. (Photo by Roger Viollet/Getty Images) The Tiger I and II are arguably the most famous tanks of World War II, if not the most famous tanks in the entire history of armoured warfare. The Tiger I was, perhaps surprisingly for a tank which achieved such a reputation, quickly designed utilising components that had been partially tested in previous heavy Panzers. The need for a new and better-armoured heavy tank that would be successful in combating British tanks and anti-tank guns had become increasingly evident to the Germans in the first years of the war. Underlining the need for an improved tank, the Soviet T-34 medium tank, encountered after the Nazi invasion of Russia on 22 June 1941, shocked the Germans with its thick, sloped skin, excellent mobility, and powerful armament. Following the appearance of the T-34 and the heavy Soviet KV-1, the design and production of an effective heavy Panzer was pursued with increased urgency. By the time the first models rolled off the production line in August 1942, the Tiger I featured extremely thick armour, providing it with what was at that time a formidable level of battlefield survivability. It also mounted a powerful long-barrelled 8.8cm gun that could at normal combat ranges defeat virtually every enemy tank then in existence. The launch of Tiger II production in January 1944 allowed the deployment of the most powerful combat tank during the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué De Presse Janvier 2019 Le Passé a Toujours Un Futur
    COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE JANVIER 2019 LE PASSÉ A TOUJOURS UN FUTUR LE MUSÉE DES BLINDÉS ET L’ASSOCIATION UNIVEM PRÉSENTENT LES DEUX CHARS LES PLUS EMBLÉMATIQUES DE LA SECONDE GUERRE MONDIALE Le Musée des Blindés de Saumur constitue l’une des plus importantes collections mondiales de véhicules blindés de la Première Guerre mondiale à nos jours. Cette institution représente non seulement un très important patrimoine technique mais elle remplit parfaitement sa mission de mémoire de la France au combat qui fait partie de notre histoire. A l’occasion de la 44ème édition de Rétromobile, le Musée des Blindés de Saumur fera son retour au Salon. En partenariat avec l’association Univem, ils mettront en avant deux modèles emblématiques de chars allemand et américain. LE PANZER IV ET LE SHERMAN SE SONT AFFRONTÉS DANS DE NOMBREUX COMBATS Le Panzer IV Robustesse, fiabilité et performance caractérisent le Panzer IV. Engagé par l’armée allemande, ce char est considéré comme l’un des meilleurs engins blindés présents durant la seconde guerre mondiale. Sa silhouette basse et son canon de 75 mm en faisait une arme redoutable. Il pouvait détruire un autre blindé en perforant les 10 cm de blindage avec précision. Son poids de moins de 30 tonnes en faisait un char très mobile. De plus, il a pour particularité, un blindage double de la tourelle et des flancs. Le Panzer IV a survécu à la guerre ! 20 ans plus tard, il était encore au service de plusieurs armées. Le Sherman C’est le char le plus célèbre de la seconde guerre mondiale.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Panzer IV
    Spanish Panzer IV By Catalan 15 January 2008; Revised Category: 20th Century: Military History The end of the Spanish Civil War in 1939 saw a drastic ‘modernization’ of Spain’s armored forces. Of course, the word ‘modernization’ can only be used when comparing Spain’s armor prior to the war with what it was left at the war’s end. Spain purchased her first tank on 19 May 1919 from the French Renault factory. This tank was the French FT-17, designed during the First World War, and the tank represented a fairly important step in the mechanization of the Spanish Army. Despite Spanish interests in acquiring at least another ten vehicles, the French government was unwilling to complete further orders. It wasn’t until the Spanish colonial disaster at the Battle of Annual that the French government finally conceded to the sale of another eleven FT-17s, including one command tank. These twelve tanks served in the Spanish Protectorate of Northern Morocco between 1922 and 1926, partaking in the amphibious landing at Alhucemas in September 1925. When the Spanish Civil War began in July 1936, two small regiments were outfitted with a total of ten FT-17 tanks – both the Republic and the Nationalist uprising were able to gain control of one of these regiments a piece[1]. For all intents and purposes, the Spanish Civil War began with ten obsolete FT-17s and six CA1 Schneider tanks of the same era. The CA1s had been sold by the French government to Spain in the same deal as the FT-17s, and also served during the Rif War in Morocco[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Armoured Vehicles Market Report 2014 FOREWORD
    Defence IQ ARMOURED VEHICLES MARKET REPORT 2014 FOREWORD In 1914, the British War Office placed an order for a Holt tractor – one of the most famous forebears of the military battle tank – and began trials at Aldershot in the hopes of delivering a solution to the stalemate of trench warfare through the use of an armoured ‘land ship’. One hundred years on and Aldershot will again be host to the world’s largest conference dedicated to armoured vehicles, the very descendants of that Holt tractor. Modern armoured vehicles will take to the Long Valley Test Track as part of the International Armoured Vehicles 2014 exhibition and conference. Ahead of this key event, Defence IQ has published this report to provide a broad overview of how the international industry looks today. Two overriding trends struck me while reading this report: First, there is a discernible shift – a far more palpable one than I’ve seen in previous iterations of this annual report – of armoured vehicle demand in the growing economies of the Middle East, Africa and Latin America while the more established markets of North America and Europe suffer the effects of the economic downturn. And second, it is clear that, despite protestations to the contrary over recent years, the era of the tank is certainly not dead. While new technologies and ‘smart’ platforms continue to roll off the production line, the survey data and analysis in this report demonstrate that there will always be a requirement for armoured vehicles, be it for expeditionary missions or peacekeeping operations. Despite the tough economic context, nations continue to spend considerable sums on maintaining capable armoured and protected mobility forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Bovington Garrison & the Armour Centre: a History
    Bovington Garrison & The Armour Centre: A History XXXX Bovington Garrison & The Armour Centre: A History Front Cover Image by the Tank Museum Contents From Rifle Range to Garrison: An Essay 5 Bovington: The Early Years 75 History of the Armour Centre 95 FROM RIFLE RANGE TO GARRISON AN ESSAY ON BOVINGTON CAMP (1899-1925) BY G. E. LANNING SUMMER 1970 1 INTRODUCTION This essay was written as an exercise in producing a piece of local history from primary sources. As such, it formed part of the course of the Southampton University Diploma in Education. When the work began, I had no idea of what period in time I should be covering. Having discovered, however, that the land on which the camp is built was sold to the War Office in 1899, this particular year became the obvious starting point. I later decided to make 1925 the finishing date because by then Bovington Camp, after many years of uncertainty, had become firmly established as the Tank Corps Centre with its own flourishing community of servicemen and civilians. The aim of the essay, then, is to trace the development of Bovington during the first quarter of the twentieth century. I began my research at the beginning of 1969 and quickly discovered that I had started two or three years too late. All the old records which I had hoped to find in the offices of the Ministry of Public Building and Works, for instance, has recently been destroyed. Then again, a number of old men who had known Bovington before the First World War had recently died.
    [Show full text]