Future of

Pierre Binétruy

Memorial Conference

APC-Paris, May 2018

Jean Iliopoulos

ENS Paris

I He was fully active until the last moment

I He was a member of the LISA collaboration

I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death

I Pierre left us in April 2017 I He was a member of the LISA collaboration

I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death

I Pierre left us in April 2017

I He was fully active until the last moment I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death

I Pierre left us in April 2017

I He was fully active until the last moment

I He was a member of the LISA collaboration I Pierre left us in April 2017

I He was fully active until the last moment

I He was a member of the LISA collaboration

I Several articles in which he had collaborated appeared even after his death

I With the discovery of the BEH scalar the Standard Model is complete

I It is no more The Standard Model

I But The Standard Theory

THE STANDARD MODEL

··· and BEYOND I It is no more The Standard Model

I But The Standard Theory

THE STANDARD MODEL

··· and BEYOND

I With the discovery of the BEH scalar boson the Standard Model is complete I But The Standard Theory

THE STANDARD MODEL

··· and BEYOND

I With the discovery of the BEH scalar boson the Standard Model is complete

I It is no more The Standard Model THE STANDARD MODEL

··· and BEYOND

I With the discovery of the BEH scalar boson the Standard Model is complete

I It is no more The Standard Model

I But The Standard Theory I The Standard Theory has been enormously successful

I It contains 17 + ··· arbitrary parameters (masses and coupling constants) and they have all been determined experimentally

I This number is irreducible Any relation of the form λ = f (g) will not be respected by renormalisation

I The Standard Theory is the absolute totalitarian system. Whatever is not forbidden, it is compulsory

THE STANDARD THEORY I It contains 17 + ··· arbitrary parameters (masses and coupling constants) and they have all been determined experimentally

I This number is irreducible Any relation of the form λ = f (g) will not be respected by renormalisation

I The Standard Theory is the absolute totalitarian system. Whatever is not forbidden, it is compulsory

THE STANDARD THEORY

I The Standard Theory has been enormously successful I This number is irreducible Any relation of the form λ = f (g) will not be respected by renormalisation

I The Standard Theory is the absolute totalitarian system. Whatever is not forbidden, it is compulsory

THE STANDARD THEORY

I The Standard Theory has been enormously successful

I It contains 17 + ··· arbitrary parameters (masses and coupling constants) and they have all been determined experimentally I The Standard Theory is the absolute totalitarian system. Whatever is not forbidden, it is compulsory

THE STANDARD THEORY

I The Standard Theory has been enormously successful

I It contains 17 + ··· arbitrary parameters (masses and coupling constants) and they have all been determined experimentally

I This number is irreducible Any relation of the form λ = f (g) will not be respected by renormalisation THE STANDARD THEORY

I The Standard Theory has been enormously successful

I It contains 17 + ··· arbitrary parameters (masses and coupling constants) and they have all been determined experimentally

I This number is irreducible Any relation of the form λ = f (g) will not be respected by renormalisation

I The Standard Theory is the absolute totalitarian system. Whatever is not forbidden, it is compulsory I The discovery of weak neutral currents (CERN 1973)

I The discovery of charmed particles (SLAC-Brookhaven 1974-1976)

I The discovery of QCD and asymptotic freedom (SLAC-··· 1973-··· )

I The discovery of the gauge (CERN 1983)

I The discovery of b and t flavours (FermiLab, LEP)

I The discovery of the BEH boson (CERN 2012)

THE STANDARD THEORY

Our confidence in this theory is fully justified by its successes in predicting new phenomena and its impressive agreement with experiment: I The discovery of charmed particles (SLAC-Brookhaven 1974-1976)

I The discovery of QCD and asymptotic freedom (SLAC-··· 1973-··· )

I The discovery of the gauge bosons (CERN 1983)

I The discovery of b and t flavours (FermiLab, LEP)

I The discovery of the BEH boson (CERN 2012)

THE STANDARD THEORY

Our confidence in this theory is fully justified by its successes in predicting new phenomena and its impressive agreement with experiment:

I The discovery of weak neutral currents (CERN 1973) I The discovery of QCD and asymptotic freedom (SLAC-··· 1973-··· )

I The discovery of the gauge bosons (CERN 1983)

I The discovery of b and t flavours (FermiLab, LEP)

I The discovery of the BEH boson (CERN 2012)

THE STANDARD THEORY

Our confidence in this theory is fully justified by its successes in predicting new phenomena and its impressive agreement with experiment:

I The discovery of weak neutral currents (CERN 1973)

I The discovery of charmed particles (SLAC-Brookhaven 1974-1976) I The discovery of the gauge bosons (CERN 1983)

I The discovery of b and t flavours (FermiLab, LEP)

I The discovery of the BEH boson (CERN 2012)

THE STANDARD THEORY

Our confidence in this theory is fully justified by its successes in predicting new phenomena and its impressive agreement with experiment:

I The discovery of weak neutral currents (CERN 1973)

I The discovery of charmed particles (SLAC-Brookhaven 1974-1976)

I The discovery of QCD and asymptotic freedom (SLAC-··· 1973-··· ) I The discovery of b and t flavours (FermiLab, LEP)

I The discovery of the BEH boson (CERN 2012)

THE STANDARD THEORY

Our confidence in this theory is fully justified by its successes in predicting new phenomena and its impressive agreement with experiment:

I The discovery of weak neutral currents (CERN 1973)

I The discovery of charmed particles (SLAC-Brookhaven 1974-1976)

I The discovery of QCD and asymptotic freedom (SLAC-··· 1973-··· )

I The discovery of the gauge bosons (CERN 1983) I The discovery of the BEH boson (CERN 2012)

THE STANDARD THEORY

Our confidence in this theory is fully justified by its successes in predicting new phenomena and its impressive agreement with experiment:

I The discovery of weak neutral currents (CERN 1973)

I The discovery of charmed particles (SLAC-Brookhaven 1974-1976)

I The discovery of QCD and asymptotic freedom (SLAC-··· 1973-··· )

I The discovery of the gauge bosons (CERN 1983)

I The discovery of b and t flavours (FermiLab, LEP) THE STANDARD THEORY

Our confidence in this theory is fully justified by its successes in predicting new phenomena and its impressive agreement with experiment:

I The discovery of weak neutral currents (CERN 1973)

I The discovery of charmed particles (SLAC-Brookhaven 1974-1976)

I The discovery of QCD and asymptotic freedom (SLAC-··· 1973-··· )

I The discovery of the gauge bosons (CERN 1983)

I The discovery of b and t flavours (FermiLab, LEP)

I The discovery of the BEH boson (CERN 2012) THE STANDARD THEORY

In addition, it shows an impressive agreement with experiment in a very large number of detailed measurements.

I For the first time we check weak interactions at the level of radiative corrections

I The Standard Theory has become a high precision theory

THE STANDARD THEORY

I Most of these successes constitute in fact a triumph of renormalised perturbation theory I The Standard Theory has become a high precision theory

THE STANDARD THEORY

I Most of these successes constitute in fact a triumph of renormalised perturbation theory

I For the first time we check weak interactions at the level of radiative corrections THE STANDARD THEORY

I Most of these successes constitute in fact a triumph of renormalised perturbation theory

I For the first time we check weak interactions at the level of radiative corrections

I The Standard Theory has become a high precision theory

For some reason the validity of (improved) perturbation expansion seems to cover most of the gray area I Or, What is wrong with the Standard Theory??

I I. General questions

I II. Specific points

I Given this impressive success... What does Beyond mean? I I. General questions

I II. Specific points

I Given this impressive success... What does Beyond mean?

I Or, What is wrong with the Standard Theory?? I II. Specific points

I Given this impressive success... What does Beyond mean?

I Or, What is wrong with the Standard Theory??

I I. General questions I Given this impressive success... What does Beyond mean?

I Or, What is wrong with the Standard Theory??

I I. General questions

I II. Specific points High precision measurements High precision measurements Heavy flavour decays Heavy flavour decays Flavour changing neutral currents Heavy flavour decays Dark matter masses and oscillations Neutrino masses and oscillations

My conclusion :

• A data-driven subject in which theorists have not played the major role.

• Substantial improvement in precision could be expected during the coming years.

• The significance of such improvements is not easy to judge.

• So far no real illumination came from to be combined with the sector for a more complete theory of flavour (see P. Ramond’s talk)

The trouble is that I do not see how this could change! I Why three families

I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3)

I Why so many mass scales

I Hierarchy and fine tuning

I Unification

I Quantum gravity

I Many others you can add

More general questions I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3)

I Why so many mass scales

I Hierarchy and fine tuning

I Unification

I Quantum gravity

I Many others you can add

More general questions

I Why three families I Why so many mass scales

I Hierarchy and fine tuning

I Unification

I Quantum gravity

I Many others you can add

More general questions

I Why three families

I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3) I Hierarchy and fine tuning

I Unification

I Quantum gravity

I Many others you can add

More general questions

I Why three families

I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3)

I Why so many mass scales I Unification

I Quantum gravity

I Many others you can add

More general questions

I Why three families

I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3)

I Why so many mass scales

I Hierarchy and fine tuning I Quantum gravity

I Many others you can add

More general questions

I Why three families

I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3)

I Why so many mass scales

I Hierarchy and fine tuning

I Unification I Many others you can add

More general questions

I Why three families

I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3)

I Why so many mass scales

I Hierarchy and fine tuning

I Unification

I Quantum gravity More general questions

I Why three families

I Why U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3)

I Why so many mass scales

I Hierarchy and fine tuning

I Unification

I Quantum gravity

I Many others you can add I No coherent picture emerges

I We were expecting new physics to be around the corner..... But we see no corner

I The easy answer: We need more data

I Two problems: (i) We do not know what kind of data (ii) They will not come for quite a long time

I A rather frustrating problem!

Conclusions I We were expecting new physics to be around the corner..... But we see no corner

I The easy answer: We need more data

I Two problems: (i) We do not know what kind of data (ii) They will not come for quite a long time

I A rather frustrating problem!

Conclusions

I No coherent picture emerges I The easy answer: We need more data

I Two problems: (i) We do not know what kind of data (ii) They will not come for quite a long time

I A rather frustrating problem!

Conclusions

I No coherent picture emerges

I We were expecting new physics to be around the corner..... But we see no corner I Two problems: (i) We do not know what kind of data (ii) They will not come for quite a long time

I A rather frustrating problem!

Conclusions

I No coherent picture emerges

I We were expecting new physics to be around the corner..... But we see no corner

I The easy answer: We need more data I A rather frustrating problem!

Conclusions

I No coherent picture emerges

I We were expecting new physics to be around the corner..... But we see no corner

I The easy answer: We need more data

I Two problems: (i) We do not know what kind of data (ii) They will not come for quite a long time Conclusions

I No coherent picture emerges

I We were expecting new physics to be around the corner..... But we see no corner

I The easy answer: We need more data

I Two problems: (i) We do not know what kind of data (ii) They will not come for quite a long time

I A rather frustrating problem! I The Future of Particle Physics will undoubtedly be bright, but....

I I will not learn the answer

I We have a very successful Standard Theory and we will leave the problem of its completion to the younger generation.....

I But now, they must do it without Pierre

My Conclusions I I will not learn the answer

I We have a very successful Standard Theory and we will leave the problem of its completion to the younger generation.....

I But now, they must do it without Pierre

My Conclusions

I The Future of Particle Physics will undoubtedly be bright, but.... I We have a very successful Standard Theory and we will leave the problem of its completion to the younger generation.....

I But now, they must do it without Pierre

My Conclusions

I The Future of Particle Physics will undoubtedly be bright, but....

I I will not learn the answer I But now, they must do it without Pierre

My Conclusions

I The Future of Particle Physics will undoubtedly be bright, but....

I I will not learn the answer

I We have a very successful Standard Theory and we will leave the problem of its completion to the younger generation..... My Conclusions

I The Future of Particle Physics will undoubtedly be bright, but....

I I will not learn the answer

I We have a very successful Standard Theory and we will leave the problem of its completion to the younger generation.....

I But now, they must do it without Pierre